Vargas Llosa goes from the sublime to the ridiculous

The awarded Nobel Prizes sometimes disappoint. Vargas Llosa is

great when he analyzes the Venezuelan dictatorship, but quite the
opposite when he told to Gabriel Garca Mrquez his judgments
about him. He is a great statesman when analyzing socialism, but
quite the opposite when he analyzes capitalism and democracy;
he has not been able to see that capitalism is regressing and
moving towards self-destruction; Vargas Llosa does not contribute
the only feasible way: " capitalism perfecting", but the opposite.
Neither Cubans nor Vargas Llosa can ask the Pope Francisco to
denounce the tyranny of the Castros in the territory of Cuba. Nor
will you ask to Cardinal Ortega, who, like Garcia Marquez, has
been subjected to states terrorism, terrorism against families and
individual people; what would have to be established in
international courts as crimes against humanity.
On September 29, 2014 was posted on Facebook:
"Misunderstanding between Silvio and Pablito
Secrets of public figures arouse the curiosity of people for to
know what happened. This could be the cases of Silvio-Pablito
and Gabriel Garca- Vargas Llosa. But no, it's not about
"morbid feelings" at all; the audience by their wit sensed
what happened, because they know the psychology of the
"protectors", created by "great benefactor" for himself. They
know that the first couple and Gabriel Garcia Maques
received benevolence and/or blackmail from the Tyrant. What
people want is that the protagonists present the facts to they
serve as a complaint, a small drop more about the crimes
committed.
The disagreements in the first case may have occurred as
follows: Silvio, feeling himself in low with the regime for his
creation, for example, a song like "The Ladder," which could
have disturbed the "protectors".Then, later, at a meeting of
the Nueva Trova, he was asked: "what does he believed about
the political ravings of Pablito? Silvio instead of saying "is not
that; he probably said: Pablito is in the feverish restlessness
of creation", "We have different opinions, but he will
reconsider" or "Pablito knows what suits him; he will return to

the lane " or " he just needs time" Possibly any of these
phrases infuriated Pablito, may be that's why he has not
allowed to touch the issue of his relations with Silvio.
Pablito really should reconsider: the tolerance is one more
force for the necessary unity to fight against "protectors".
Vargas Llosa knows much about tyranny, but apparently he
did not think of one of its characteristics: the proximity to the
tyrant is like to the sun, scorching. Garcia-M possibly felt
himself enough clean to approach the tyrant without been
burned and enrich his literary heritage further. But he did not
know that "the great benefactor" as unscrupulous gangster,
has a team of psychologists and psychiatrists able to find in
Garcia-M the weaknesses hidden in his subconscious, which
he did not know from himself, which tyrant would exploit
properly for to blackmail him. Yes, Vargas Llosa was certainly
hard with Garcia-M, who would not have dared to speak its
possible embarrassment".
Neither Cubans nor Vargas Llosa should ask to USA win the rights
and freedoms which Cubans we lost playing to a bad card.