Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Organic Electronics
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/orgel
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 28 November 2013
Received in revised form 10 February 2014
Accepted 18 March 2014
Available online 1 April 2014
Keywords:
Organic dyes
DFT/TDDFT
Dual band
Donoracceptor
Absorption spectra
a b s t r a c t
A series of metal free organic sensitizers have been designed and their optoelectronic properties for DSSC applications have been systematically investigated using density functional
theory (DFT) and time dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) methods. The role of
donor/acceptor monomers on the electron donating/withdrawing abilities has been discussed and promising donoracceptor combinations are screened. Based on this screening,
some of novel metal free sensitizers have been designed and their electronic and spectral
properties have been investigated using DFT/TDDFT methods. Our results show that the
designed molecules are promising candidates to provide good performances as sensitizers
in the DSSC applications.
2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Considering the environmental issues and renewable
resources, more and more attentions have been paid on
the solar energy utilizations. The dye sensitized solar cells
(DSSCs) have attracted considerable interest after the report of ORegan and Gratzel [1] due to the high photonto-current conversion efciency, easy production and
cost-effective properties. In recent years, number of sensitizer molecules have been developed, which includes metal-free organic dyes [25], non-ruthenium metal dyes
[69] and ruthenium (II)-polypyridly complexes [1012]
and reported their performances in the DSSC applications.
At present, the state-of-the-art DSSCs are based on the
ruthenium metal complexes, such as N3/N719 and black
dye, which hold the record of the overall efciencies up
to 11.5% under standard (Global AM 1.5) irradiation [13
15]. However, there are some snags of ruthenium(II)-based
Corresponding authors. Tel.: +886 2 27376653; fax: +886 2 27376644.
E-mail addresses: santhanamoorthi@gmail.com (S. Nachimuthu),
jcjiang@mail.ntust.edu.tw (J.-C. Jiang).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.orgel.2014.03.022
1566-1199/ 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1206
the suitable dyes, which have reasonable optical properties. This could be possible if we design the sensitizer with
the absorption spectrum covers visible-to-near-infrared
range, have signicant intra-molecular charge separation
after absorbing sun light, and it should stably bind to the
semiconductor surface so that electrons can inject to surface continuously [16,21,22].
Herein, we aimed to design a potential metal-free sensitizer which overcomes the aws of existing dyes and to
nd an efcient way to tune optoelectronic properties.
Nowadays, there are two ways in which the spectral properties of DA or DpA molecules can be improved: changing the conjugation length of the sensitizer, and
substituting different electron -rich and -decient units
to modify the spectrum. Previously it is reported that,
some DA oligomers have dual-band optical absorption
spectra which provide broad absorption characteristics
[23,24]. In general, dual-band absorption spectrum arises
from two separate transitions, which lead to either charge
transfer between the donor and acceptor units along with a
pp* transition (so-called intra-molecular charge transfer,
ICT) [25,26], or reorganization of molecular orbitals to produce accessible low- and high-lying energy levels spread
across both donor and acceptor units (usually named as
pp* transition to make a distinction from ICT) [2729].
In the present study, we selected 12 monomers which
are systematically varied by both in the donor and acceptor-units, to form the different p-conjugated DA oligomers and evaluated their optoelectronic properties. The
selected 12 monomers are thiophene (T), thienopyrazine
(TP), dithienopyrazine (DTP), thiadiazolothienopyrazine
(TDTP), 1,4-dihydro-1-phenylpyrazine (PPP), cyclopentadithiophene (CDT), dicyanomethylidene-cyclopentadithiophene (CDM), 9-phenylcyclopentadithiophene (TPAT),
N,N-bis (4-methoxy-phenyl)-thiophene-2-amine (MPTA),
10-phenyl-10H-phenothiazine (PTAZ), triphenylamine
(TPA), 4-methoxy-N-(4-methoxyphenyl)-N-phenyl- benzeneamine (MPBA), and 9-phenyl-9H-carbazole (PC).
These monomers are derived from the several compounds
[30], which are universally used in the design of DA oligomers, namely thienopyrazine, thiophene, thiazine, carbazole, and phenylamine compounds, thus the resulting 66
DA oligomers could be applied as a model system to represent the general classes of DA oligomers.
2. Computational details
All the calculations in this study were performed with
Gaussian 09 package [31]. The geometries of neutral
monomers and metal-free sensitizers were optimized
using B3LYP exchange correlation functional [32] combined with the standard double-f plus polarization basis
set, 6-31G(d) [33]. Different basis sets and functionals in
gas phase did not affect the structural parameters much,
but it inuences the optoelectronic properties such as excitation energies and intensities. Hence, we have performed
a benchmark calculation in order to nd the most suitable
method for simulating UVVis absorption. For this, we
considered four DFT methods such as, PBE0, B3LYP,
BHandHLYP and CAM-B3LYP to calculate the UVVis
absorption spectra for TC-1 [34], T2-1 [2] and I-1 [35] molecules of DA type and L1 [36], TAStCA [3] and MK2 [19]
molecules of DpA type. We used 6-31G (d) basis set for
all the benchmark calculations and the calculated excitation energies of DA type and DpA type molecules are
shown in Table 1.
Compared with the experimental values of DA and D
pA types of molecules, the calculated results show that
the absorption energy from B3LYP was more accurate for
DA system and BHandHLYP method show perfect agreements for DpA system which contains longer conjugated
length. Considering that DpA backbone molecules are
main structures in real DSSCs, therefore, we choose
BHandHLYP functional to calculate the optoelectronic
properties of DpA molecules including 20-lowest excitation energies and intensities of all the metal-free sensitizers considered here.
The optoelectronic properties were transformed, using
the SWizard program [37,38], into simulated spectra as described before, using Gauss functions with half-widths of
4000 cm1, as shown in following equation:
X fI
x x1 2
ex c1
exp 2:773
D
1=2;I
D21=2;I
1
!
1
Table 1
The calculated UVVis absorption energies (in nm) for DA and DpA
sensitizers using different DFT methods.
Sensitizers
PBE0
B3LYP
BHandHLYP
CAM-B3LYP
Exptl.a
TC-1
T2-1
I-1
451.7
441.6
435.9
401.7
461.7
453.3
354.3
367.2
374.4
359.0
370.2
381.6
400
452
483
L1
TAStCA
MK2
482.4
504.5
575.2
506.9
534.2
612.8
405.8
409.3
481.5
404.3
403.0
472.6
405
410
480
1207
Fig. 1. Sketch of molecular structures of thienopyrazine, thiophene, thiazine, carbazole, and phenylamine-based derivative monomers.
the correlations between IPv vs. HOMO and EAv vs. LUMO,
which are shown in Fig. S1. From Fig. S1, we found a linear
relationship between the calculated IPv and HOMO and EAv
with LUMO. From this relationship, we are able to identify
the order of donor- and acceptor-monomers strengths.
The strength of donor from strong to weak is:
PPP > MPBA > MPTA > PTAZ > TPA > PC > CDT > DTP > TPAT >
CDM > TDTP > TP > T and the order of acceptor strength is
TDTP > CDM > DTP > TP > CDT > TPAT > PC > PTAZ > TPA >
MPTA > MPBA > PPP > T.
3.2. Roles of donor and acceptor monomers in optoelectronic
properties
Next, we designed a series of p-conjugated DA oligomers based on the order of electron donating- and electron
withdrawing-abilities. One way to design these DA oligomers is to distinguish what combination of donor and
acceptor could have suitable UVVis absorption for the
practical applications. Accordingly, the present study care-
1208
Fig. 2. The roles of (a) donor and (b) acceptor in governing the energy gap preferences of the selected p-conjugated DA oligomers. In gures (a) and (b), the
strength of donor- and acceptor-units, is varied from strong (left) to weak (right).
Fig. 3. The roles of (a) donor and (b) acceptor-units in governing the UVVis absorption spectra of the selected p-conjugated DA oligomers. In gures (a)
and (b), the strength of donor and acceptor -units, is varied from strong (top) to weak (bottom).
1209
Table 2
The calculated absorption energies (k), oscillator strengths (f), light harvesting efciency (LHE) and transition characters of ve representative DA oligomers:
CDMTDTP, TPATDTP, PPPTDTP, PPPCDT and PPPMPBA molecules. The states with f > 0.1 are shown.
DA molecule
Electronic transition
k (nm)
f (a.u)
LHE
Transition assignment
CDMTDTP
S0 ? S1
S0 ? S7
S0 ? S8
1011.7
388.5
377
0.13
0.48
0.11
0.259
0.669
0.224
S0 ? S12
S0 ? S13
341.7
336.1
0.33
0.33
0.532
0.532
H?L (+100%)a
H ? L + 2(+75%)b
H-4 ? L (+64%)a
H ? L + 2(+13%)b
H-2 ? L + 1(+74%)b
H-5 ? L (+49%)a
TPATDTP
PPPTDTP
H-4 ? L (18%)a
H-5 ? L (+20%)a
H-4 ? L + 1(12%)b
S0 ? S1
S0 ? S6
S0 ? S11
S0 ? S13
1058.7
388.4
332
317.2
0.15
0.58
0.29
0.27
0.292
0.737
0.487
0.463
H ? L (+100%)
H ? L + 1(+92%)a
H-8 ? L (+47%)b
H ? L + 3(+94%)b
S0 ? S1
S0 ? S4
S0 ? S9
S0 ? S11
1205.6
412.3
333.6
321.9
0.19
0.47
0.27
0.25
0.354
0.661
0.463
0.438
H ? L (+100%)a
H ? L + 1(+92%)a
H-5 ? L (+67%)b
H ? L + 4(+57%)b
H-7 ? L (37%)a
H ? L + 3(38%)b
PPPCDT
S0 ? S1
S0 ? S3
435.9
339.4
0.81
0.44
0.845
0.637
H ? L (+100%)
H-1 ? L (+86%)b
PPPMPBA
S0 ? S2
S0 ? S7
370.6
321.6
1.05
0.11
0.911
0.224
H ? L (+92%)b
H ? L + 3(+75%)a
Fig. 4. UVVis absorption spectra of (a) MPBACDM based and (b) MPBATP based oligomers. The black solid line represents donor and acceptor system
with anchoring group (DA*CN), blue dash one is for donor and acceptor system with p-linker (DpA), and the red dash line is DpA*CN system.
1210
Table 3
Absorption energy (k), oscillator strength (f), light harvesting efciency (LHE) and transition character of the singlet excited states of MPBACDM series
calculated by BHandHLYP/6-31G(d) level of theory. The states with k > 300 nm and f > 0.1 are shown.
Molecule
Electronic transition
k (nm)
f (a.u)
LHE
Transition assignment
MPBACDM*CN
S0 ? S1
S0 ? S2
S0 ? S3
S0 ? S5
733.3
472.9
405
323.6
0.22
0.12
1.25
0.20
0.397
0.241
0.944
0.369
S0 ? S6
312.6
0.64
0.771
H-1 ? L (+28%)a
H ? L (30%)a
H-1 ? L+1(+17%)a
H-3 ? L (+25%)a
H-1 ? L+1(10%)a
H-6 ? L (+20%)a
H ? L+2(+13%)b
H-2 ? L (+17%)a
S0 ? S7
305.3
0.22
0.397
H ? L (+68%)a
H-1 ? L (+58%)a
H ? L+1(+71%)a
H-6 ? L (+32%)a
H-5 ? L (11%)a
H-1 ? L+1(+21%)a
H-3 ? L (20%)a
H ? L+2(+45%)b
MPBATCDM
S0 ? S1
S0 ? S3
S0 ? S5
729.3
374
309.2
0.09
1.52
0.54
0.187
0.970
0.712
H ? L (+46%)a
H ? L+1(+79%)a
H-6 ? L (+87%)a
H-1 ? L (+45%)a
MPBATCDM*CN
S0 ? S1
S0 ? S3
S0 ? S6
760.7
429.2
340.9
0.29
1.65
0.42
0.487
0.978
0.620
H-1 ? L (+39%)a
H-1 ? L+1(+20%)a
H-1 ? L+1(30%)a
S0 ? S7
313.9
0.45
0.645
H ? L (+55%)a
H ? L+1(+60%)a
H ? L+1(+33%)a
H ? L+2(20%)b
H-8 ? L (+45%)a
H-7 ? L (+18%)a
LHE 110f
1211
Table 4
Absorption energy (k), oscillator strength (f), light harvesting efciency (LHE) and transition character of the singlet excited states of MPBATP series calculated
by BHandHLYP/6-31G(d) level of theory. The states with k > 300 nm and f > 0.1are shown.
Molecule
Electronic transition
k (nm)
f (a.u)
LHE
Transition assignment
MPBATP*CN
S0 ? S1
S0 ? S4
514.2
326
0.99
0.36
0.898
0.563
H ? L (+92%)a
H ? L+1(+72%)a
a
MPBATTP
S0 ? S1
S0 ? S2
S0 ? S4
472.6
349
319.3
0.63
0.12
0.65
0.766
0.241
0.776
H ? L (+77%)
H-1 ? L (+64%)a
H ? L+1(+73%)b
MPBATTP*CN
S0 ? S1
S0 ? S4
563.6
335
1.24
0.54
0.942
0.712
S0 ? S5
320.4
0.21
0.383
H ? L (+84%)a
H ? L+1(+46%)a
H ? L+2(+16%)b
H ? L+2(+69%)b
H-1 ? L+1(+18%)a
H-1 ? L (+20%)a
H ? L (17%)a
H-1 ? L+1(+27%)a
H ? L+1(14%)a
where f is the oscillator strength of the designed dyes corresponds to the wavelength and the calculated values are
given in the respective tables. As can be seen from those
values, the LHE of the designed dyes are large, which is required to enhance the photocurrent response of the DSSCs.
Figs. 5 and 6 show the high-lying and low-lying molecular orbitals of the most important excitations, which illustrate the either charge transfer or pp* character, of
MPBACDM and MPBATP based systems, respectively.
For both the cases, the main assignment of Band 1 is due
the transition from HOMO to LUMO, whereas for Band 2
is HOMO to LUMO+1. It can be seen from Fig. 5, all the
transitions of MPBACDM series show the ICT character,
which is required for the highly efcient sensitizers. However, in the HOMO to LUMO transition, the electrons are
transferred from donor (MPBA) to acceptor counterpart
(CDM) whereas, in the HOMO to LUMO+1 transition, the
electrons are transferred to both acceptor and anchoring
Fig. 5. Representations of HOMO, LUMO and LUMO+1 corresponding to the important excitations of MPBACDM series shown in Table 3. Both HOMO to
LUMO and HOMO to LUMO+1 reveal ICT character in all the cases.
1212
Fig. 6. Representations of HOMO, LUMO and LUMO+1 corresponding to the important excitations of MPBATP series shown in Table 4. Both HOMO to
LUMO and HOMO to LUMO+1 reveal ICT character in all the cases.
long wavelength absorption band is due to the ICT character and importantly excited electrons not only localized on
the acceptor, but also on the anchoring group: hence it is
easy to inject the excited electrons into the TiO2 surface.
In summary, we suggested some potential sensitizers
which have suitable optoelectronic properties and we believe that these molecules can be used as an efcient sensitizes for the new generation of DSSCs.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the nancial support from the National Science Council of Taiwan (NSC 101-2113-M-011004-MY3). We are also thankful to the National Center of
High-Performance Computing (NCHC) for donating computer time and facilities.
Appendix A. Supplementary material
Supplementary material: the plots of vertical ionization
potential (IPv), electron afnity (EAv), schematic illustrations of selected fragments and optoelectronic properties
of MPBACDT based series are shown. Supplementary data
associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.orgel.2014.03.022.
References
[1] B. ORegan, M. Gratzel, A low-cost, high-efciency solar cell based on
dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 lms, Nature 353 (1991) 737739.
[2] H.N. Tian, X.C. Yang, R.K. Chen, Y.Z. Pan, L. Li, A. Hagfeldt, L.C. Sun,
Phenothiazine derivatives for efcient organic dye-sensitized solar
cells, Chem. Commun. (2007) 37413743.
[3] S. Hwang, J.H. Lee, C. Park, H. Lee, C. Kim, C. Park, M.H. Lee, W. Lee, J.
Park, K. Kim, N.G. Park, C. Kim, A highly efcient organic sensitizer
for dye-sensitized solar cells, Chem. Commun. (2007) 48874889.
[4] Z.S. Wang, Y. Cui, Y. Dan-Oh, C. Kasada, A. Shinpo, K. Hara,
Thiophene-functionalized coumarin dye for efcient dye-sensitized
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
1213
[26] S.A. Jenekhe, L.D. Lu, M.M. Alam, New conjugated polymers with
donoracceptor architectures: synthesis and photophysics of
carbazolequinoline and phenothiazinequinoline copolymers and
oligomers exhibiting large intramolecular charge transfer,
Macromolecules 34 (2001) 73157324.
[27] U. Salzner, Does the donor-acceptor concept work for designing
synthetic metals? 1. Theoretical investigation of poly(3-cyano-30 hydroxybithiophene), J. Phys. Chem. B 106 (2002) 92149220.
[28] U. Salzner, M.E. Kose, Does the donor-acceptor concept work for
designing synthetic metals? 2. Theoretical investigation of
copolymers of 4-(dicyanomethylene)-4H-cyclopenta[2,1-b: 3,4-b
]dithiophene and 3,4-(ethylenedioxy)thiophene, J. Phys. Chem. B
106 (2002) 92219226.
[29] U. Salzner, O. Karalti, S. Durdagi, Does the donoracceptor concept
work for designing synthetic metals? III. Theoretical investigation of
copolymers between quinoid acceptors and aromatic donors, J. Mol.
Model. 12 (2006) 687701.
[30] H.A.M. van Mullekom, J.A.J.M. Vekemans, E.E. Havinga, E.W. Meijer,
Developments in the chemistry and band gap engineering of donoracceptor substituted conjugated polymers, Mater. Sci. Eng. R 32
(2001) 140.
[31] M.J. Frisch, G.W. Trucks, H.B. Schlegel, G.E. Scuseria, M.A. Robb, J.R.
Cheeseman, G. Scalmani, V. Barone, B. Mennucci, G.A. Petersson, H.
Nakatsuji, M. Caricato, X. Li, H.P. Hratchian, A.F. Izmaylov, J. Bloino,
G. Zheng, J.L. Sonnenberg, M. Hada, M. Ehara, K. Toyota, R. Fukuda, J.
Hasegawa, M. Ishida, T. Nakajima, Y. Honda, O. Kitao, H. Nakai, T.
Vreven, J.A. Montgomery, Jr.; J.E. Peralta, F. Ogliaro, M. Bearpark, J.J.
Heyd, E. Brothers, K.N. Kudin, V.N. Staroverov, R. Kobayashi, J.
Normand, K. Raghavachari, A. Rendell, J.C. Burant, S.S. Iyengar, J.
Tomasi, M. Cossi, N. Rega, N.J. Millam, M. Klene, J.E. Knox, J.B. Cross,
V. Bakken, C. Adamo, J. Jaramillo, R. Gomperts, R.E. Stratmann, O.
Yazyev, A.J. Austin, R. Cammi, C. Pomelli, J.W. Ochterski, R.L. Martin,
K. Morokuma, V.G. Zakrzewski, G.A. Voth, P. Salvador, J.J.
Dannenberg, S. Dapprich, A.D. Daniels, O. Farkas, J.B. Foresman, J.V.
Ortiz, J. Cioslowski, D.J. Fox, Gaussian 09, Revision A.1, in: Gaussian
Inc., Wallingford, CT, 2009.
[32] A.D. Becke, Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of
exact exchange, J. Chem. Phys. 98 (1993) 56485652.
[33] V.A. Rassolov, M.A. Ratner, J.A. Pople, P.C. Redfern, L.A. Curtiss, 6
31G*basis set for third-row atoms, J. Comput. Chem. 22 (2001) 976
984.
[34] W. Xu, B. Peng, J. Chen, M. Liang, F. Cai, New triphenylamine-based
dyes for dye-sensitized solar cells, J. Phys. Chem. C 112 (2008) 874
880.
[35] T. Horiuchi, H. Miura, S. Uchida, Highly efcient metal-free organic
dyes for dye-sensitized solar cells, J. Photochem. Photobiol., A 164
(2004) 2932.
[36] D.P. Hagberg, T. Marinado, K.M. Karlsson, K. Nonomura, P. Qin, G.
Boschloo, T. Brinck, A. Hagfeldt, L. Sun, Tuning the HOMO and LUMO
energy levels of organic chromophores for dye sensitized solar cells,
J. Org. Chem. 72 (2007) 95509556.
[37] S.I. Gorelsky, A.B.P. Lever, Electronic structure and spectral, of
ruthenium diimine complexes by density functional theory and
INDO/S. Comparison of the two methods, J. Organomet. Chem. 635
(2001) 187196.
[38] S.I. Gorelsky, SWizard program, in: <http://www.sg-chem.net/>,
University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada, 2013.
[39] C.G. Zhan, J.A. Nichols, D.A. Dixon, Ionization potential, electron
afnity, electronegativity, hardness, and electron excitation energy:
molecular properties from density functional theory orbital
energies, J. Phys. Chem. A 107 (2003) 41844195.
[40] K. Hara, T. Sato, R. Katoh, A. Furube, T. Yoshihara, M. Murai, M.
Kurashige, S. Ito, A. Shinpo, S. Suga, H. Arakawa, Novel conjugated
organic dyes for efcient dye-sensitized solar cells, Adv. Funct.
Mater. 15 (2005) 246252.
[41] H. Choi, C. Baik, S.O. Kang, J. Ko, M.S. Kang, M.K. Nazeeruddin, M.
Gratzel, Highly efcient and thermally stable organic sensitizers for
solvent-free dye-sensitized solar cells, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 47
(2008) 327330.
[42] S. Jungsuttiwong, T. Yakhanthip, Y. Surakhot, J. Khunchalee, T.
Sudyoadsuk, V. Promarak, N. Kungwan, S. Namuangruk, The effect of
conjugated spacer on novel carbazole derivatives for dye-sensitized
solar cells: density functional theory/time-dependent density
functional theory study, J. Comput. Chem. 33 (2012) 15171523.
[43] K. Srinivas, C.R. Kumar, M.A. Reddy, K. Bhanuprakash, V.J. Rao, L.
Giribabu, D-pi-A organic dyes with carbazole as donor for dyesensitized solar cells, Synth. Met. 161 (2011) 96105.
1214
[44] K.F. Chen, Y.C. Hsu, Q.Y. Wu, M.C.P. Yeh, S.S. Sun, Structurally simple
dipolar organic dyes featuring 1,3-cyclohexadiene conjugated unit
for dye-sensitized solar cells, Org. Lett. 11 (2009) 377380.
[45] K. Srinivas, K. Yesudas, K. Bhanuprakash, V.J. Rao, L. Giribabu, A
combined experimental and computational investigation of
anthracene based sensitizers for DSSC: comparison of cyanoacrylic
and malonic acid electron withdrawing groups binding onto the TiO2
anatase (1 0 1) surface, J. Phys. Chem. C 113 (2009) 2011720126.
[46] R.Z. Li, J.Y. Liu, N. Cai, M. Zhang, P. Wang, Synchronously reduced
surface states, charge recombination, and light absorption length for
high-performance organic dye-sensitized solar cells, J. Phys. Chem. B
114 (2010) 44614464.
[47] Z.S. Wang, N. Koumura, Y. Cui, M. Takahashi, H. Sekiguchi, A. Mori, T.
Kubo, A. Furube, K. Hara, Hexylthiophene-functionalized carbazole
dyes for efcient molecular photovoltaics: tuning of solar-cell
performance by structural modication, Chem. Mater. 20 (2008)
39934003.
[48] K.R.J. Thomas, Y.C. Hsu, J.T. Lin, K.M. Lee, K.C. Ho, C.H. Lai, Y.M.
Cheng, P.T. Chou, 2,3-disubstituted thiophene-based organic dyes
for solar cells, Chem. Mater. 20 (2008) 18301840.