Sample Complaints Lori Fleming

-.
........
Memorial Hall
120 SW 10111AVE., 2nd Floor

Topeka, Ks 66612
THIS COMPLAINT IS AGAINST 11THDISTRICT JUDGe LORI BOLTON FL~ING FOR

USURPATION OF OFFICE UNDER K.S.A. 60-1201, K.S.A. 60-1202(1)(2)(4)(5). K.S.A. 601205. K.S.A. 60-1206(a)(b), K.S.A. 60-1207 and for violations of RULES RELATING TO
JUDICIAL CONDUCT CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT Rule 601A.
I recently heard a grand jury petition that was gOing around to oust all
judicial district j4-dges due to

conflicts of interest between them. During the petition drive to try to get the signatures a rac;tioad was ran
on 100.7 ESPN My Town Media which is owned by attorney Bill Wachter. I head the radio ad and didn't
have a pen with me to write down who to contact to sign the petiion. After just 2 days of running on the air
Judge Lori Fleming took it upon herself to use her power inappropriately as a judge and to usurplintrude
into a private business contract between Summary Judgment Group and My Town Media. !was wanting to
sign the "Grand Jury Petition" but never ran into anyone who was getting signatures for the petition
because the radio ad was only ran for 2 days instead of 30 like I was informed by The Summary Judgment
Group which was the original contract that was breached by Lori Fleming and Bill Wachter.
11111
J win be signing a class-action lawsuit now against Lori Fleming in her private capacity si~
she was not
performing her public ministerial duties or job descriptions by interfering in a radio ad and d~maging myself
the opportunity to sign a grand jury petition and she also damaged the summary jUdgment group and they
did not get the required voters due to her interference in a private business matter and constitutional grand
jury petition.
Very truly: yours,
CC Kansas Commission on Judicial Qualifications and State Insurance Commissioner
1- ,~
(,YI-fr
f'p~
e('
I
Ii;;",,~
vI." j ,1
I,
th
(J, "''''oM,
~r I ''':;1 ~'.f\
Office Of The Attorney General

Memorial Hail
120 SW 10th AVE., 2nd Floor

Topeka, Ks 66612
THIS COMPLAINT
USURPATION
IS AGAINST 11TH DISTRICT JUDGE LORI BOLTON
FLE~ING
OF OFFICE UNDER K.S.A. 60-1201. K5.A. 60-1202(1)(2)-(4)(5}.
FOR
K.5.A. 60-
1205. K.S.A. 60-1206(a)(b). K.S.A. 60-1207 and for violations of RULESRl:LATING TO

JUDICIAL CONDUCT
CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT
Rule 601A.
I recently heard a grand jury petition that was going around to oust a1l11 th judicial district }ij~ges due to
conflicts of interest between them. Ouring the petition drive to try to get the signatures a raqio ad was ran
on 100.7 ESPN My Town Media which is owned by attorney Bill Wachter. I headihe radio ad and didn't
into a private business contract between Summary Judgment Group and My Town Media. t was wanting to
sign the "Grand Jury Petinon" but never ran into anyone who was getting signatures for the petition
because the radio ad was only ran for 2 days instead of 30 llke I was informed by The Summary Judgment
Iwill be signing a class-action lawsuit now against Lori Fleming in her private capacity sin~~ she was not
the opportunity to sign a grand jury petition and she also damaged the summary judgment group and they
jury petition.
Very truly YQurs,
CC Kansas Commission on Judicial Qualific ./ions and State Insurance Commissioner
1)/
Office Of The Attomey General

Memorial Hall
120 SW 1()th AVE., 2nd Floor
Topeka, Ks 66612
THIS COMPLAlNT
USURPATION
FLE~ING
OF OFFICE UNDER K.S.A. 60-1201. K.S.A. 60-1202(1)(2)(4)(5).
1205, K.S.A. 60-1206(a)(b),

JUDICIAL CONDUCT
K.S.A. 60-1207 and for violations
FOR
K.S.A. 60-
of RULES RELATING TO
Rule 601A.
I recently heard a grand jury petition that was going around to oust all 11III judicial district jU(:fgesdue to
conflicts of interest between them. During the petition drive to try to get the signatures a ra~io ad was ran
Judge Lori Fleming took it upon herself to use her power inappropriately as a judge and to usurpJintrude
into a private business contract between Summary Judgment Group and My Town Media. t was wanting to
because the radio ad was only ran for 2 days instead of 30 like J was informed by The Summary Judgment
I will be signing a class-action lawsuit now against Lori Fleming in her private capacity sin~ she was not
performing her public ministerial duties or job descriptions by interfering in a radio ad and ~maging myself
jury petition.
Very truty yours,
==--",,.......,m=i:.:::::ssion
on Judicial Qualifications and State Insurance Commissioner
0)
-o
i-{,t}tan '
\~Q\
'0 r
~
d.
~qt)fh
5f-
/vudb~f~ rKf
MYX{

Memorial Hall

Topeka, Ks 66612
THIS COMPLAINT
USURPATION
1205.
IS AGAINST 11TH D1STRICT)UDGE
LORI BOLTON
FL~ING
OF OFFICE UNDER K5.A. 60-1201. K.S.A. 60-1202(1)(2)(4)f5).
K.S.A. 60-1206{a)(b).
JUDICIAL CONDUCT
FOR
K.S.A. 60-
K.S.A. 60-1207 and for violations of RULES RELATING TO
Rule 601A.
I recently heard a grand jury petition that was going around to oust all 11III judicial district lU9ges due to
conflicts of interest between them. During the petition drive to try to get the signatures a raqio ad was ran
into a private business contract between Summary Judgment Group and My Town Media. l was wanting to
because the radio ad was only ran for 2 days instead of 30 like I was informed by The -Summary Judgment
performing her public ministerial duties or job descriptions by interfering in a radio ad and damaging myself
jury petition.
.
Very truf1 yours,
~~
0lJS---V- G(:~hcu~ 5
I
fuf\l~\oy\
f-
YtS ?'C?34
q -6 -It;
Kansas Commission on Judici~l Qualifications
301 SW 10th
Topeka Ks 66612
THIS COMPLAINT ISAGAINST 11TH DISTRICTJUDGE LORI BOLTON FL~ING

I recently signed a grand jury petition that was going around to impeach all.1-1111 4udicialili~ct judges due
to conflicts of interest between them which was filed in case number'2015MR2P. During the petition drive
to try to get the signatures a radio ad was ran on 100.7 ESPN My Town Media which is owned by attorney
Bill Wachter who is Chief Judge A.J. Wachter's brother. There seems to be an e-mailthat came from
Judge Lori Fleming's public computer that seems to be inappropriate conduct. Please ~estigate this
m~~
I will be signing a class-action lawsuit now against Lori Fleming in her private capacity since she was not
performing her public ministerial duties or job descriptions by interfering in a radio ad and damaging the
summary jUdgment group by not getting the required 315 voters due to her interf~fence in a private
business matter and constitutional grand jury petition.
Very truly yours,
6r\<'v\chn
()(Y\; v-tV'
~s
Kansas Commission on Judicial Qualifications

301 SW 10lh
Topeka Ks 66612
THIS COMPLAINT IS AGAINST 1FH DISTRICT JUDGE LORI BOLTON Fl~MING. KURT
LOY. AND CHIEF JUDGE A.J. WACHTER OF CRAWFORD COUNTY KAI)ISAS
I would have signed a grand jury petition that was going around to impeach all11lh judicial district judges
due to conflicts of interest between them which was filed in case number 2015MR2P but I never heard
about the petition advertised on the radio. During the petition drive to try to get the signatijJes a radio ad
was ran on 100.7 ESPN My Town Media which is owned by attorney Bill Wachter who is C~ief Judge A.J.
Wachter's brother. There seems to be an e-rnail that came from Judge Lori t:-leming's-:pubtic computer that
seems to be inappropriate conduct which shut down the radio ad. Please investigate this matter.
performing her public ministerial duties or job descriptions by interfering in a radio ad anq, damaging the
summary judgment group by not getting the required 315 voters and only 121 \lue to heri,nterference in a
private business matter and constitutional grand jury petition.
\JJ
Kansas Commission on Judici~1 Qualifications

301 SW 10th
Topeka Ks 66612
THIS COMPLAINT ISAGAINST 11TH DISTRICTJUDGE LORI BOLTON Ft~{\'lING, KURT

lOY. AND CHIEF JUDGE A.J. WACHTER OF CRAWFORD COUNTY ~SAS
I would have signed a grand jury petition that was going around to impeach all111h judicial district judges
about the petition advertised on the radio. During the petition drive to try to get the signat~fes a radio ad
was ran on 100.7 ESPN. My Town Media which is owned by attorney Bill Wachter who is C~ief
Judge AJ.
I
Wachter's brother. There seems to be an e-mail that came from Judge Lori F/eming's-l'ublic computer that
performing her public ministerial duties or job descriptions by interfering in a radio ad a~ damaging the
summary judgment group by not getting the required 315 voters and only 121 due tofter interference in a

301 SW 10th
Topeka Ks 66612
THIS COMPLAINT
IS AGAINST
l]TH
DISTRICT JUDGE LORI BOLTON FL~fvUNG, KURT
LOY, AND CHIEF JUDGE AJ. WACHTER OF CRAWFORD COUNTY
KA~SAS
I would have signed a grand jury petition that was going around to impeach all 11th judicial district judges
about the petition advertised on the radio. During the petition drive to try to get the signatures a radio ad
I
Wachter's brother. There seems to be an e-mail that came from Judge Lori Fleming's pubtic computer that
summary judgment group by not getting the required 315 voters and only 121 due to her 1terference in a

301 SW 10th
Topeka Ks 66612
THIS COMPLAINT
LOY, AND CHIEF JUDGE A.J. WACHTER OF CRAWFORD
COUNTY
FL~fV1ING. KURT
KAt)lSAS
was ran on 100.7 ESPN My Town Media which is owned by attorney Bill Wachter who is Chief Judge A.J.
Wachter's brother. There seems to be an e-mail that came from Judge Lori Fleming'spubUc computer that
performing her public ministerial duties or job descriptions by interfering in a radio ad anQ damaging the
summary judgment group by not getting the required 315 voters and only 121 due to her interference in a
Very truly yours,
8{e*ctn'j &q.J!fY'
1JP(j}(xu~ufLf
50 ; CJ
c
~ .(~~
"
U
b <:;7 cs
'fj\j \ ~'v
}-roj;lk!lCtC

301 SW 10th
Topeka Ks 66612
THIS COMPLAINT
IS AGAINST 11TH DISTRICT JUDGE LORI BOLTON FL~ING.
LOY, AND CHIEF JUDGE A.J. WACHTER OF CRAWFORD
COUNTY
KURT
KA1)ISAS
Wachter's brother. There seems to be an e-mail that came from Judge Lori Ffeming's .f*IbIic computer that
performing her public ministerial duties or job descriptions by interfering in a radio ad an~ damaging the
summary judgment group by not getting the required 315 voters and only 121 due to-her Interference in a

Memorial Hall

Topeka, Ks 66612
THIS COMPLAINT IS AGAINST 11TH DISTRICT JUDGE LORI BOLTON FLEING FOR
USURPATION OF OFFICE UNDER K.s.A. 60-1201, K.S.A. 60-1202(1)(2)(4)(5). K.S.A. 601205, K.S.A. 60-1206(a}(b}. K.S.A. 60-1207 and for violations of RULES RELATING TO
JUDICIAL CONDUCT
Rule 601A.
I recently heard a grand jury petition that was going around to oust all 11th judicial district Ndges due to
Judge Lon Fleming took it upon herself to use her power inappropriately as a judge and to usurplintrude
into a private business contract between Summary Judgment Group and My Town Media. ~was wanting to
jury petition.
Very truly yours,
lh!
~()r~
September 15, 2015

301 SW 10th
Topeka Ks 66612
THIS COMPLAINT ISAGAINST 11TH DfITft1CT JUDGE LORI BOLTON flEMING

I recently signed a grand jury petition that was goin~ around to impeach all11~ct
judges due
to conflicts of interest between them which was filed in case number 2015MR2P. During the petition drive
to try to_getthe signatures a radio ad was ran on-1DO.7J:SPN My Town.Mectta:which.iS-Qwned by attorney 6i1!Wachter who is Chief Judge A.J. Wachter's brother. There seems to be an e-mail"tftat..came from
Judge Lori Fleming's public computer that seems to be inappropriate conduct because she calls anyone
that signs the petition "Posse Comitatus" which is a demeaning nickname Ulldef~2.~-of Rules Relating
To Judicial Conduct. Please investigate this matter.
I will be signing a class-action lawsuit now against Lori Fleming in her private~~jnce
she was not
performing her public ministerial duties or job descriptions by interfering in a radio ad a", damaging the
summary judgment group by not getting the required 315 voters and only 12111ueio J~~:~JPterferencein a
Very truly yours
September ,5, 2015

301 SW;OII1
Topeka Ks 66612
THIS COMPLAINT
flEMING
I recently signed a grand jury petition that was going around to impeach aIl11tl]~~ct
judges due
to conflicts of interest between therl'1Which was filed in case number 2015MR2P. During the petition drive
to try to get the signatures a radio ad *as ran on 100.7 ESPN My Town Media-which-is,owned by attorney
Bill Wachter who is Chief Judge-A.J. Wachter's brother. There seems to be an e-mail that came from
Judge Lori Fleming's public computer that seems to be inappropriate conduct because she ,calls anyone
that signs the petition "Posse Cornitanls" which is a demeaning nickname und~a~
Rules Relating
To Judicial Conduct. Please investigat~this. matter.
I will be signing a class-action lawsuit now against Lori Fleming in her privata capacity since she was not
performing her public ministerial duties or job descriptions by interfering in a radio ad arnt:,damaging the
summary judgment group by not getting the required 315 voters and only 121 due toi:re~=rterference in a
September 15, 2015

301 SW 10th
Topeka Ks 66612
THIS COMPLAINT
IS AGAINST 11TH DISTRICT JUDGE LORI BOLTON FlEMlNG
I recently signed a grand jury petition that was going around to impeach all 11th~ct
judges due
to try to get the signatures a radio ad was ran on 100.7 ESPN My Town Medra which-isowned by attorney
8i11Wachter who is Chief Judge A.J. Wachter's brother. There seems to be an e-mail tnat.came from
that signs the petition "Posse Comitatus" which is a demeaning nickname under~L;3-d
Rules Relating
performing her public ministerial duties or job descriptions by interfering in a radio ad aiM( damaging the
summary judgment group by not getting the required 315 voters and only 121 duetoilerJ}1terference
in a
~ ef+'
I J ;2 0/5
Kansas Commission on Judici~1 Qualifications

301 SW 10th
Topeka Ks 66612
THIS COMPLAINT ISAGAINST 11TH DISTRICTJUDGE LORI BOLTON FL~ING

I recently signed a grand jury petition that was going around to impeach all t1tb Judicia\,district judges due
Bill Wachter who is Chief Judge A.J. Wachter's brother. There seems to be an e-mailthat came from
Judge. Lori Fleming's public computer that seems to be..inappropriate conduct. -Please I~estigate this
matter.
\
summary judgment group by not getting the required 315 voters due to her interf~rence in a private
A s'h Jet Pi. oc: \

t
) L[ l t! tv,
p~+)bUYs
<):fIe
l+--r.:'(\
/(~ fo~7foQ...

301 SW 10th
Topeka Ks 66612
THIS COMPLAINT IS AGAINST 11TH DISTRtCT JUDGE LORI BOLTON FlEMING

I recently signed a grand jury petition that was going around to impeach all11~judicial distrlctjudges due
Bill Wachter who is Chief Judge A.J. Wachter's brother. There seems to be an e-mail ~h.atcame from
Judge Lori"Fleming's public computer that seems To De inappropriate"conduct. Please i~estigate ffiis
~~~
summary jUdgment group by not getting the required 315 voters due to her interf~.rence in a private
Very truly yours, ~
[0 { ::;
~tl.lr
0{JC
Kansas Commission on Judici,,1 Qualifications
301 SW 10th
Topeka Ks 66612
THIS COMPLAINT
IS AGAINST lFH DISTRICT JUDGE LORI BOLTON
FLEMING
I recently signed a grand jury petition that was going around to impeach all ~1~.judicial-district judges due
Bill Wachter who is Chief Judge A.J. Wachter's brother. There seems to bean e-mailthat came from
Judge Lori Fleming's public computer that seems to be inappropriate conduct. Please i~estigate this
~br.
summary judgment group by not getting the required 315 voters due to her interf~rence in a private
nber5,2015
-
-~---

301 SW 10th
Topeka Ks 66612
THIS COMPLAINT ISAGAINST 11TH DISTRICTJUDGE LORI BOLT~{!:.MING

REGARDING DOCKET NUMBER 1270 IN THE MATTER OF LO&tA~"TON
FLEMING IN CRAWFORD COUNTY KANSAS.
I was writing back to your committee in-regards to Docket number 12VB whiclI-1 r6reiv-ed from your office
dated August 28,2015. I would like to know if Lori A. Bolton Fleming went ahead and "ADMITTED" that
she sent the ernail that ruined the radio contract advertisement with My TowA-MeGiaiMJfJ~led Eric Muathe
and the "Posse Comitatus" or if she lied about the email being sent and this docket nun1tJer 1270 has been
assigned an "INVESTIGATOR" like when I previously complained on attorney Eric Bruce in Docket Number
DA11,812 and he lied to the investigator and his computer was "CONFISCATBX during the investigation
to check the computers for the email that was sent.
I need to know because I was allowed to meet with the attorney investigator Mr~jaGk::Soo.tlMclnteer in
Wichita to look at what attorney Eric Bruce "wrote and responded" and to go over all the information the
investigator had to show us and to ask us if we had any more information avai~ablefor the investigation to
be completed.
The reason I need to know if she admitted that she sent the email is because 1have.a "VERY CLEAR"
picture of the email that Lori Fleming sent from the 11th district computers on February 19, 2015. The
picture gets lighter and harder to read once it's copied.
I DO NOT TRUST THAT YOUR COMMITTEE WILL ACTUALLY ADMIT THAT YOU GE'P;"'FHECLEAR
PICTURE OF THE EMAIL IF I SEND IT IN SINCE YOUR COMMITJEE IS FAMOU-S-F0RACTING LIKE
THEY DON'T GET COMPLAINTS AND DON'T RECEIVE MAIL!
~.
- .~---"
I sent in a complaint on Timothy Fielder that was heard on August 7, 2015 but 'NO RESPONSE" from your
committee about the complaint. I don't have the money to have to pay for certified mai~e.\t~rytime I send
something to your office just to make sure you get it. I do take pictures with my-Phog~~ time I send
something in the mail to your office just so if your office lies and wants to act like1hey~ave
it I do
have the pictures to prove I sent it.
However, this is an "EXTREMELY IMPORTANT" investigation In The Matter otLori A. BOlton Number 1270
and if for some reason Lori A. Bolton Fleming "LIED AND DENIED" to your office that she sent the email
that breached our radio contract advertisement then I do want to meet with the investigator just like I did
with Mr. Mclnteer and then I will bring the picture o! the "VERY CLE~R" emai~so your inv~.uti~ator can see
in person and I can still keep-my "VERY CLEAR" picture of theemail that Lon-A. i3eltoo H~lng sent that
usurped her power. Lori A. Bolton can not call up a grocery store manager or any sports team coach for
example and say "I'm Lori Fleming and I'm d11th district judge and you need to quit doing business and
selling groceries to Eric Muathe and Posse Comitatus"! That would be usur~~r
just like if she
said to a coach "I'm a judge and my kid is better so play him or else"!! That would be usurPrtion of power
just like she did when she called up Bill Wachter and informed him "You need to.-get -tlle~il
off or else"!!
She is out of control and in my opinion is acting like "Adolph Hitler" and her father-in-law Robert Fleming
ex-chairperson of The Kansas Commission-on Judicial Qualfflcations should bfi dooketed
and investigated
<:
to because he "INTERFERED" in this investigation because he informed itATTORNE"f--BU;.LWACHTER"
who is part of the docketed complaint and the attorney that the email was sent to from Lori}. Bolton
Fleming at Crowell's Ash in Pittsburg where they have coffee together at 10:OJlam.:. etaene.ek where he
was UOVERHEARD" telling Bill Wachter that "hey we might have to go in front of the committee on that
complaint on you and Lori. because I called a friend of mine on Panel B to see if-I cotJifJpull
any strings and
<- .
he wouldn't even talk to me because they are mad at me right now because there has [jeen to many
complaints sent in"!!
0-
This is the type of stuff that goes on in Pittsburg Kansas and this is why Ido think that Panel A and Panel B
should have been recused from this investigation under Rule 2.11(A) considering that both Lori Fleming,
Robert Fleming, Kurtis Loy, and A.J. Wachter are all co-defendants in case numbel:.2015CV79P
along with
,;...
Panel A and Panel B and all are using the same attorney to defend the case'~:le
all been
complained on and investigated by your committee over the email that was s e 11th district
computer.
It would seem to me that the only reason your committee did not disqualify yourseltisJ)(~cause Lori A.
Bolton Fleming "ALREADY ADMITIED" she sent the email andthattherewillbe ..FO~L
PROCEEDINGS" against her in docket number 1270 otherwise would just seem-to~nflict
of interest
and reasons to complain on your committee as well.
.- Please contact me and let me know if there is an investigator assigned to this case. and if the investigator
needs a "MORE CLEAR" copy of the email or if the one I sent in previously was good9qQugh and Lori A.
Bolton Fleming "BEGGED FORGIVENESS" to the committee instead of just flat out ilLYI~G AND SAYING
SHE DID NOT SEND IT"!
I
,
Very truly yours

Kasey King
P.O. Box 101
September 1, 2015
301 SW 10m
Topeka Ks 66612
THIS COMPLAINT
IS AGAINST 1FH DISTRICT JUDGE LORI BOLTON
FLEMING
I recently signed a grand jury petition that was going around to impeach aIl111h-4~ct
judges due
to conflicts of interest between them which was filed in case number 2015MR2P, During the petition drive
to try to get the signatures a radio ad was ran on 100.7 ESPN My-town'Medicrwhich is owned by attorney
Bill Wachter who is Chief Judge A,J, Wachter's brother. There seems to be an e-mail tIlat... yame from
that signs the petition "Posse Comitatus' which is a demeaning nickname under~
Rules Relating
performing her public ministerial duties or job descriptions by interfering in a radio ad anl:.damagingthe
summary judgment group by not getting the required 315 voters and only 121-dl1e.to-hpr.jnterference in a
Very truly yours

Patrick Dickerson
1210 S, Broadwaf
Franklin, Ks 66735
0IrCl ~
~
September 6,2015
301 SW 10th
Topeka Ks66612
Re: Case Number 2015CV38P and the Inappropriate email
THIS COMPLAINT
IS AGAINST 11TH DISTRICT JUDGE LORI BOLT0N-IMING
AND
ROBERT FLEMING REGARDING DOCKET NUMBER 1273 IN THE MATTER OF LORI A.

BOLTON
FLEMING IN CRAWFORD
COUNTY
KANSAS.
J. was writing back to.your committee.inreqards to Docket number. 12Z3.wbich I (e~eive~~om-,youI office
dated August 28,2015. Robert Fleming is1he judge in my case in case number-t5C~~
Community
National Bank
VS.
James A. Beckley etc, and I have filed an affidavit for motion lor change of judge where
Judge Kurtis Lay of the 11thdistrict should not have been assigned the case because of a conflict of
interest under Rule K.SA 20-311d(b) and it should have been assigned to D~
Justice #4 Lee
Johnson. I have.a telephone conference on September 8, 2015 where Judge Robert Fleming is the judge
and his daughter-in-law Lori A. Bolton Fleming just got docketed in case number t2tS.iJ1--tqe Matter of Lori
A. Bolton Fleming and her father-in-law thinks it is not a conflict of interest underRuJe2. f/{A) for him to
hear my case. He will retatiate against me which is not allowed under Rule 2.16(B) since he is definitely
interested in this docketed complaint because I was at Crowell's Ash on August-2S;.Qat5 at 10:00 a.m.
where Iheard Robert Fleming informed Bill Wachter and said that "hey we might have to go in front of the
committee on that complaint on you and Lori, because I called -a friend of mine-on."Panel::Bip see if I could
pull any strings and he wouldn't even talk to me because they are mad at me right now because there has
been to many complaints sent in"!!
This is extremely unethical and Robert Fleming needs a "PRIVATE OR PUBLIC CEASE'~D DESIST'
from case number 2015CV38P to avoid even more complaints. and more civil--lawsuit~gainst
the 11th
judicial district and Lori Fleming needs to be "FIRED"!!-
.
--
Sincerely,.
A /J ~
7~~1'~r
James Beckley Jr.

302 W. McKay
Frontenac, Ks 66763
~h
/J
09/08/2015
To Whom It May Concern
In response to your letter dated August 28,2015 docket number 12681 am a little confused.
Isn't the email evidence enough to reprimand Judge Lori Fleming?
First and foremost the question we the people would like to know is whether Judge Lori
Fleming already admitted to sending the email or whether she denied sending the email?
Also, did attorney William (Bill) Wachter admit to receiving the email or not?
If she admitted she sent the email and/or other related emails then let's start formal
proceedings against her as soon as possible.
If she claims she did not send this subject matter email then proof of additional emails
contradicting her position might be necessary.
For now, if you seriously want to investigate Judge Lori Fleming then all you have to do is
confiscate the court emailing depository or server, her computer(s) and/or the recipient(s)
computer(s) and/or recipient(s) email server.
Has this commission not previously relied on forensic computer analysis to gather evidence
as seen in the Matter of Robertson, 120 P.3d 790, 795 (Kansas 2005)?
Why not do the same here?
One great starting point is to do a thorough investigation as to yet another email Judge Lori
Fleming sent in early 2014 knowingly, maliciously, intentionally and with bad faith intent to
imprison, and basically retaliate against a pro se litigant who had sued her.
Inexperienced Judge Lori Fleming is the same judge who allegedly lied to a federal
prospector Alan G. Metzger (or conspired with Metzger?????) in a Wichita Federal case that
she and another female court staff were being stalked by James Donald Russian.
Where is the police indecent report on this (unless they can now manufacture one out of
thin air) and/or where is the video evidence of this since the court building has cameras
surrounding the entire building? Of course, there is no such evidence of any stalking and none
will ever be produced.
Lori Fleming is an out of control young and very inexperienced Judge!
Unethical Judge Lori Bolton Fleming's blatant lie is the only reason James Donald Russian
was denied bail and has been held in federal prison since February 2014 until his sentence
hearing yesterday September 3rd, 2015.
Listen to the Feb 24, 2014 detention/bond hearing where it is alleged Judge Lori Fleming
sent yet another email - this time with an alleged obvious stalking lie! You can jump to the
21:42 minute mark onwards to hear for yourself how the blatant lie and misuse of office led to
Mr. James Russian eventually being denied bail:
u.s. VS. James
Russian Feb 24, 2014 Hearing ( Wichita, Kansas]
Case Number 14-10018 U.S. Distinct Court

https:/lwww.youtube.comfwatch?v=jOx38H6rEGk
or use this shortened URL for the video/audio:
https:!lgoo.gl/SrhXlc
The general public is very aware of judge Lori Fleming's numerous ethic violations as seen
on www.conflictgate.com
and discussed on dinner tables and ball parks across the area. We
remind the commission that the most serious aggravating factor here is a severe erosion of
public confidence in the judiciary.
The summary Judgment group has already publicly censored Judge Lori Bolton Fleming. We
don't need the commission for that.
The public has no confidence in a judiciary where judges call self represented litigants
terrorists!
Judge Lori Fleming's record breaking docketed complaints and several prior cautions or/and
informal advice from the commission itself reflects not mere lapses or errors in judgment but a
wholesale failure of inexperienced Judge Lori Fleming's duty, reflecting an indifference if not
cynicism toward her judicial office and since the public has also expressed its choice to have a
system of discipline which can result in a judge's removal from office she needs to be fired!
There is also a question of whether or not this commission can be impartial given that we
have a pending injunctive lawsuit against the commission for what we believe is the
commission's own unethical actions, and disturbing conflict of interest with judges.
Since there is not even the appearance of a fake separation between the commission and
state employees given that you all use the same law firm (the attorney general's office) then it
appears all the commission does therefore is to protect state employees, and not hold them
accountable.
Isn't the hidden agenda of the commission to give the illusion is that the commission is
actively looking to reprimand unethical judges for their misdeeds while the truth is that you
promote and encourage unethical judicial misconduct by protecting them from valid
complaints.
It is now a proven fact that the commission has a grotesque history of telling complainants
that their complaints "contained no facts evidencing judicial misconduct as defined in the Code
of Judicial Conduct and was dismissed" while at the very same time doing two things
unbeknown to the complainant/litigant:
(1) proudly putting the real disciplinary action the
commission took against the judge(s) in their annual report, (2) sending a completely different
'disciplinary' letter cautioning, or reprimanding the Judge(s) and squarely telling the Judge(s)
that it is for their eyes only.
The public has no confidence in a commission that has resulted to such low levels of
unethical behavior.
Sincerely,
By: IslEric M. Muathe
Eric M. Muathe
Commission on Judicial Qualifications

Kansas Judicial Center
301 5W 10th Avenue, Room 374
Topeka Kansas 66612-1507
THIS COMPLAINT
USURPATION
IS AGAINST 11TH DISTRICT JUDGE LORI BOLTON FLEMING FOR
OF OFFICE UNDER K.S.A. 60-1201, K.S.A. 60-1202(1)(2)(4)(5),
1205, K.S.A. 60-1206(a)(b),

JUDICIAL CONDUCT
K.S.A. 60-
Rule 601A.
I recently heard a grand jury petition that was going around to oust all 11th judicial district judges due to
conflicts of interest between them. During the petition drive to try to get the signatures a radio ad was ran
have a pen with me to write down who to-contact to sign the petition. After just 2 days of running on the air
into a private business contract between Summary Judgment Group and My Town Media. I was wanting to
jury petition.

-Lf.-I('~
301 S'\iJ 10th Avenue, Room 374
Topeka Kansas 66612-1S07
THIS COMPLAINT
USURPATION
IS AGAINST 11TH DISTRICT JUDGE LORI BOLTON FLEMING FOR
OF OFFICE UNDER K.5.A. 60-1201, KS.A. 60-1202(1)(2)(4)(5),
1205, K.S.A 60-1206(a)(0),

JUDICIAL CONDUCT
K.S.A. 60-
Rule 601A.
have a pen with me to write down who to contact to sign the petition. After just 2 days of runoing on the air
jury petition.

301 WJ 10th Avenue. Room 374
THIS COMPLAINT
USURPATION
IS AGAINST 11THDISTRICT JUDGE LORI BOLTON FLEMING FOR
1205, K.S.A. 60-1206(a)(b),

JUDICIAL CONDUCT
KS.A. 60-1207 and for violations
K.s.A. 60-
Rule 601A.
I recently heard a grand jury petition that was going around to oust all 1111'1 judicial district judges due to
have a pen with me to write down who to contact to sign the petition. After just 2 days of running on the air
Judge Lori Fleming took it upon herself to use her power inappropriately as a judge and to usurp/intrude
jury petition.
Very truly yours,
D vLOrl
.{ft)i;b5
?cJ>5 ea.-~-77)
Pittsburg, Kansas, 66762

301 SW 10th Avenue. Room 374
THIS COMPLAINT
USURPATION
IS AGAINST 11THDISTRICT JUDGE LORI BOLTON FLEMING FOR
OF OFFICE UNDER K.5.A. 60-1201. K.S.A. 60-1202(1)(2)(4)(5).
1205. K.S.A. 60-1206(a)(b).

JUDICIAL CONDUCT
K.S.A. 60-
Rule 601A.
on 100.7 ESPN My Town Media which is owned by attorney Bill Wachter. 1 head the radio ad and didn't
have a pen with me to write down who to contact to sign the petition. After just 2 days of runoing on the air
jury petition.
Very truly yours,
~,,\~
~~~
~',\s:J1
July 24, 2015

301 SW 10th
Topeka Ks 66612
RE: THIS IS A JOINT COMPLAINT BETWEEN Andrew Moore. Travis Moore and Jenn~r Moore as we
are tired of seeing our brother Matt suffer damages when he should have been released-off corrections in
case number2011 CR279G.
THIS COMPLAINT IS AGA!N~T 11TH DISTRICT JUDGES lOR! BOLTON FLEMING AND
CHIEF JUDGE AJ. WACHTER
Our brother Matt Moore should have been off corrections after he already served his jail
time but he is still on because of a "conflict of interest" and lack of due process because
A.J. Wachter signed not one (l) but two (2) "ORDERS" against our brother Matt Moore
to retaliate against him under Rule 2.16 of Code of Judicial Conduct because my father
Lester Moore made a docketed ethic complaint against him.
My father made a complaint and it was docketed in docket number 1179 In The Matter
of A.J. Wachter and it was actually used as an "ADVISORY EXAMPLE" in 2.Ql1 and Judge
Wachter received an informal letter of advice in the divorce case between my parents
Lester and Jenitta Moore. Judge Wachter did tell both my parents -theyilad to get an
attorney even though he lied and stated he never said that. Please reprimand Judge
Wachter under Rule 2.16 Retaliation from the complaint my father sent on Judge
Wachter and he has made our brother Matt suffer because of my father's complaint.
Judge Wachter signed "ORDERS" on October 18.2013 from the date of revpcetton
hearing on October 8.2013 and on February 5.2015 from the hearing on February 4.
2015. Our brother was supposed to be off probation already and then Judge Wachter
signed an order and he should not have subject-matter jurisdiction because of my father's
docketed complaint against him.
We recently signed a grand jury petition that was going around to impeach all 11th judicial district judges
due to conflicts of interest between them which was filed in case number 2015MR2P. During the petition
drive to try to get the signatures a radio ad was ran on 100.7ESPN My Town Media which is owned by
attorney Bill Wachter who is Chief Judge AJ. Wachter's brother. There seems to be an e-mail that came
from Judge Lori F!eming's public computer that seems to be inappropriate conduct. Please. investigate this
matter.
We will be signing a class-action lawsuit now against Lori Fleming in her private capacity since she was not
summary judgment group by not getting the required 315 voters and only 121 due to her; interference in a
Very truly yours

Andrew Moore 1012 West 3m, Pittsburg Ks 66762
Travis Moore 203 E. Oak, Mulberry Ks
Jennifer Moore
6 6~ 6
g,tate
If
1kan~a~
QCommiggion on j/ubictal ~uaHfication~

301 S.W. Tenth Avenue
Topeka, Kansas 66612-1507
judicialqual@kscourts.org
Telephone 785-296-2913
Facsimile 785-296-1028
MEMBERS OF
PANELB
CHAIR:
Jeffery A. Mason
Lawyer Member
VICE-CHAIR:
March 11,2013
Lester Moore
P. O. Box 1861
Pittsburg, Kansas 66762
Dr. Mary Davidson Cohen

Lay Member
Re:
Bruce Buchanan
Lay Member
Dear Mr. Moore:
Robert J. Fleming
Judge Member
David J. King
Judge Member
Docket No.
1179, In the Matter of A. 1. Wachter
The Commission met March 1, 2013, at which time the above-captioned

complaint was considered. It was the decision of the Commission to docket your
complaint and make further inquiry. The matter will be placed on the Commission's
May 3, 2013, meeting agenda.
Nicholas St. Peter

Judge Member
Cordially,
Diane S. Worth
Lawyer Member
Secretary
SECRETARY:
Carol G. Green
Topeka, KS 66612-1507
mm
Judge Fleming recused.
ADVISORY
No violation was found when it was alleged judge advised parties in a divorce matter
they were required to have attorneys at the next hearing. While the judge denied the allegation,
the judge could not provide a corroborating transcript because a heariagwas aot made. The
judge was informally advised on the importance of preserving a record of all court proceedings.
No violation was found for delay when it was alleged a judge failed to r~e on a motion
taken under advisement. The judge indicated there was not a mechanism inplace to help
monitor case loads, acknowledged the delay, and took remedial steps-toeeselve future issues.
The judge was informally advised on the importance of monitoring matters taken under
advisement.
A Notice of Formal Proceedings was filed alleging a judicial candidate, violated Rule
4.l(A)(4) by posting false or misleading campaign statements and/or endorsements on the
candidate's campaign website. The candidate denied knowingly or recklessly::making any false
or misleading statements but, in an abundance of caution, removed the misleading information
and clarified the endorsement. A stipulation was entered that there was insufficient, clear, and
convincing evidence to establish a violation of Rule 4.1(A)(4), but the Respondent was advised
to be more careful in restating endorsements, should the decision be made to. run again for
elected office.
No violation was found when it was alleged a judge appe-ared late

recess, never returned, and instructed a deputy to clear the courtroom
mailed. The judge was informally advised to review hearing procedures.
was directed to K.S.A. 38-2243(b) and (d), K.S.A. 38-2232, and 38-2233
of children in DCF Custody.
for a hearing, called a

as a ruling would be
The judge's attention
authorizing placement
'
No violation was found when it was alleged a judge made a female litigant feel
humiliated and traumatized by ordering the removal of her hat which was worn to cover baldness
due to a medical condition. While the judge acknowledged ordering the removal of the hat, in
compliance with courtroom rules, the judge denied that the comments were: intended to
humiliate.
The judge was informally advised to refrain from commenting pn personal
appearance in accordance with Ruie 2.8(B) and Comment [1].
i
.
----------2013AN"NuALREpORT. PAGE 22:--------
.....

Memorial Hall
Topeka, Ks 66612
THIS COMPLAINT
USURPATION
FLEING
,
OF OFFICE UNDER K.S.A. 60-1201, K.S.A. 60-1202{1)(2)(4H5).
1205, KS.A. 60-1206(a){b).

JUDICIAL CONDUCT
FOR
K.S.A. 60-
KS.A. 60-1207 and for violations of RULES RElATING TO
Rule 601A.
I recently heard a grand jury petition that was gojng~around to oust all 11th judicial districl:~dges due to
on 100.7 ESPN My Town Media which is owned by attorney Bill Wachter. J head the radio ad and didn't
into a private business contract between Summary Judgment Group and My Town Media. ~was wanting to
I will be signing a class-action lawsuit now against Lori Fleming in her private capacity si~ she was not
jury petition.
Very truly-yours,
C~." nsas Com~ssi.on on J i.a-:1QUalification. s and State Insurance. commissione~~
jtr
W1.~
Jol
~~#1C4
R()(IJ Uj~JS(Jf1
30 ~ 5~tq5cJiq
~ilk\;f\
/(5
foCo
7 <5
'3
_....l.J ... ,
~I'"""i>yf .

Memorial Hall
Topeka, Ks 66612
THIS COMPLAINT
IS AGAINST 11TH DISTRICT JUDGE lORI BOLTON FLEI\(\ING FOR
USURPATION OF OFFICE UNDER K.S.A. 60-1201, K.S.A. 60-1202(1)(2){4){5),

1205, K.S.A. 60-1206(a){b).
JUDICIAL CONDUCT
K.S.A. 60-
K.S.A. 60-1207 and for violations of RULES R1:LATING TO
Rule 601A.
Irecently heard a grand jury petition ttl~tw~sgoing around to oust ~1l111l1j~dicial districtNd9~S due to
conflicts of interest between them. During the petition drive to try to get the signatures a ,agio ad was ran
on 100.7 ESPN My Town Media which is owned by attorney am Wachter. J head the radio ad and didn't
into a private business contract between Summary Judgment Group and My Town Media. l was wanting to
sign the "Grand Jury Petition" but never ran into anyone who was getting signatures for the ,petition
Iwill be signing a class-action lawsuit now against Lori Fleming in her private capacity sin~ she was not
performing her public ministerial duties or job descriptions by interfering in a radio ad and ~maging myself
jury petition.
Very truly-yours,

301 SW 10th
Topeka Ks 66612
THIS COMPLAINT
IS AGAINST 11TH DISTRICT JUDGE LORI BOLTON FLEMING
I recently signed a grand jury petition that was going around to impeach all 11th judiciah:tistrict judges due
Bill Wachter who is Chief Judge A.J. Wachter's brother. There seems to be an e-mail that came from
Judge lon-Fleming's public computer lffat seems to be lnapproprtate cotiduct, Please i~estigate thiS
matter.
Iwill be signing a class-action lawsuit now against Lori Fleming in her private capacity since she was not
performIng her public ministerial duties or job descriptions by interfering in a radio ad and damaging the
very truly yours

Drew Christianson
806 W. 3rd
Pittsburg Ks 66762
Commission on Judidal Qualifications

Kansas Judidal Center
301 SW 10th Avenue, Room 374
THIS COMPLAINT
USURPATION
IS AGAINST lFH DISTRICT JUDGE LORI BOLTON
FLEMING FOR
OF OFFICE UNDER K.S.A. 60-1201, K.S.A. 60-1202(1)(2){4){5),
1205. K.S.A. 60-1206(a)(b).

JUDICIAL CONDUCT
K.S.A. 60-
Rule 601A.
have a pen with me to write down who to contact to sign the petition. After just 2 days of running on the air
into a private business contract between Summary Judgment Group and My Town Media. Iwas wanting to
because the radio ad was only ran for 2 days instead of 30 like I was infonned by The Summary Judgment
Group which was the original contract that was breached by Lori Reming and Bill Wachter.
Iwill be signing a class-action lawsuit now against Lori Fleming in her private capacity since she was not
jury petition.
Very truly yours,
_<tJ~~
Mr. Dale Rice
401 Walnut,
Opolis, Kansas, 66760
Office Of The Attorney Genera!

Memorial Hall, 120, SW 10th AVE., 2nd Floor
Topeka Ks 66612
THIS COMPLAINT IS AGAINST 11TH DISTRICT JUDGE LORI BOLTON FLEMING FOR
USURPATION OF OFFICE UNDER K.S.A. 60-1201. K.S.A. 60-1202(1)(2)(4}{5).
K.S.A. 601205.
K.s.A. 60-1206(a)(b),
JUDICIAL CONDUCT CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT Rule 60lA.

I recently signed a grand jury petition that was going around to oust all 11th judicial district judges due to
conflicts of interest between them which was filed in case number 2015MR2P. During the-petition drive to
try to get the signatures a radio ad was-ran on 100;-7 ESRN My Town Media whiGJ'.}isOWI1e9 by- attorney- Bill
W~c:ht~r. Aft~rjy~t2 d~y~of running on the 'air Judge Lori Fleming took it upon herself to use her power
inappropriately as a judge and to usurplintrude into a private business contract between Summary
Judgment Group and My Town Media. She wrote a private emaH on her regular job time as a public
servant judge and she then had the nerve to profile the Summary Judgment Group and Iqake slanderous,
demeaning nicknames by calling anyone who signed it including "myself' "possee~ut"
my political views to simply sign a constitutional grand jury petition.
because of
What Lori Fleming called anyone that signed the grand jury petition is really "posse comitatus". The fact
that Lori Fleming made typos in her slanderous insulting remarks or the fact that she can't ~imply spell the
word "posse comitatus" doesn't change the fact she insulted anyone who signed fhe petition and labeled us
in a political box now! Who is Kurt in the email? Is it Judge Kurt Lay was he in on this too?? Ithink since
the copy of the message sent to 100.7 ESPN was from the email address of <Ifleming @11thjd.org> is from
a public judicial courthouse email address that the computer this was sent from needs to be taken during
the investigation and see how many other messages and emaits were sent ex parte and ~out private
matters as well. I have included a copy of the picture going around the 11th judicial district ~hich shows Lori
Fleming contacting 100.7 ESPN at 1:43 P.M. on February 19, 2015. Is this why the stats has to have
furloughs is because o~J!.uplic servants are conducting private business on taxpayers time. I will be
signing a class-action lawsuit now against Lori Fleminglnher-private capacity since she was not
performing her public ministerial duties or job descriptions by interfering in a radio ad anq damaging the
summary judgment group and not getting the required voters due to her interference in aprivate business
matter and constitutional grand jury petition.
Very truly yours,
M'I f(e.. 8I,)YC)~r
f.J: [);
Box;J ~ L.-j
(J; -HSb or j k~ f.o to71.0 'J...
CC Kansas Commission On Judicial Qualifications and State Insurance Commissioner
\.
\.
July 20, 2015

Topeka Ks 66612
TIllS COMPLAINT IS AGAINST 11m DiSTRICT JUDGES LORI BOLTON FLEMING,

KURTIS LOY, AND A.J. WACHTER FOR USURPATION OF OFFICE UNDER K.S.A. 601201, K.S.A. 60-1202(1)(2)(4)(5), KS.A. 60-1205, K.S.A. 6O-1206(a)(b), K.S.A, 60-1207 and
for violations of RULES RELATING TO JUDICIAL CONDUCT COD.EOF JUQICIAL
CONDUCT Rule 601A which are the following: Rule 1.1, Rule 1.2, Rule 1.3, Rule 2.1, Rule
2.2, Rule 2.3, Rule 2.4, Rule 2.6, Rule 2.9, Rule 2.10, Ru1e 2.12, Ru1e 2.13, Rule 2.15, Rule
2.16, Rule 3.1, Rule 3.5, Rule 3.6, Rule 4.1, Rule 4.2 for improperly influencing, a BAR
attorney who was the 11thjudicial chief judge's brother to end his private onqmic
radio
contract and ruin a Grand Jury Petition, and Rule 5.4 of The Uniform Bonding Code (UBC).
I recently signed a "GRAND JURY PETITION" that was filed in Crawford County under case
number 2015MR2P on May 19, 2015 to impeach all 11thdistrict court judges fot conflicts of
interest. During the ninety (90) days we had to get the required register :voter~ignatures to
empanel a "GRAND JURY' so we attempted to run an ad on a radio station to help advertise
our "GRAND JURY PETITION". We had a paid contract with "MY TOWN MEDIA WHICH
IS OWNED BY ATTORNEY BILL WACHTER" which was paid $300 to run the ad for (30)
days on "Mike and Mike" in the morning starting on February 18th,26t5.at1::j5 a.m. when
everyone is on their way to work so they could hear the advertisement.
The advertisement
ran for only two (2) days before Lori Bolton Fleming violated our constitutional right to
unlimited contracting under Article 1 Section 10 of The United States Constitution and
"USURPED" her judicial office and "INTRUDED" into a "GRAND JURY PET~TION" and a
"ECONOMIC CONTRAClUAL RADIO AGREEMENT" by sending an e-mail to attorney
Bill Wachter at 1:43 P.M. on 02119/2015 (WHICH IS PRIVATE BUSINESSNOT A
JUDICIAL FUNCTION NOR A MINISTERIAL ACT ON OUR TAXPAYERS TIME) and
having an ex-parte conversation which violates Rule 2.9 Ex Parte Communication, Rule 1.3
avoiding inappropriate use of the prestige of judicial office, Rule 2.1 Giv.ing~retedence
to
the Duties of Judicial Office, Rule 2.2 Impartiality and Fairness, Rule 2.3 Bias, Prejudice, and
Harassment, and Rule 2.4 External Influences on Judicial Conduct and "INSTRUCTED HIM
TO GET OUR RADIO AD OFF IDS RADIO STATION'!!!!!!! Joe Mans ofMJ. Town Media
\
called me right after that and instructed me that their FCC attorney Jmd:Said!t was a FCC
violation for them to run the ad and it bad to be taken off the air and would not be ran
anymore.
The exact emait message was sent at 02119/2015 at 1:43 P to 100.7
ESPN from Lori Fleming <lfIeming@11thjd.org> an4it~,~
station?
Kurt is saying Eric Muathe and posse cometaut have an ad on
this station to oust all the judges.
this your
I would just like. know since my kids
which is signed LF for the inititials LF and unde".,ath
it
says Hon. Lori A. Bolton Fleming, Crawford County~Distdct~urt, 602

N. Locust, Pittsburg, Ks 66762,620.231-3570,
Ifleming @11thjd.org and
it has been included with this complaint for evidence.

Lori Fleming definitely violated Rule 1.3 Avoiding Inappropriate use of the P~ge
of
Judicial Office because COMMENT[l J says "It is improper for a judge re.ase-orattempt
to use
his or her position to gain personal advantage or deferential treatment of any kind. For
example, it would be improper for a judge to allude to his or her judicial status to gain
favorable treatment in encounters with traffic officials. Similarly, a judge ~
not use
judicial letterhead in conducting his or her personal -business. COMMENTi21SfYS A judge

may provide a reference or recommendation
personalknowledge.
for an individual based upon the judge's
However, the use-ofjudicialletterhead
for anything other than official
court business should be exercised with the utmost caution. A judge should only use judicial
letterhead when its use could not reasonably be perceived as an attempt ro ~propriately
use the prestige of judicial office to influence others," She also violated'Rlde2.
i Giving
Precedence to the Duties of Judicial Office as it says "The duties of judicial office, as
prescribed by law. shall take precedence over all of a judge's personal and extrajudicial
activities." COMMENT[l] says "To ensure that judges are available to fulfill ~
duties, judges must conduct their personal and extrajudicial activities to~e
conflicts that would result in frequent disqualification."
judicial
the risk of
COMMENT[2] says "Although it is
not a duty of judicial office unless prescribed by law, judges are encouraged to participate in
activities that promote public understanding of and confidence in the justice ~~tem.)I I don't
think calling people names like "posse comitatus" on her public job duty time.~ 1:43 P.M.
promotes any confidence in the justice system. She allowed external1nfluences
to influence
her judicial conduct which violated Rule 2.4 External Influences on Judicial
Conduct(A)(B)(C). She also violated Rule 2.3 by making a "demeaning nickname" and
negative stereotyping anyone that signed the "GRAND JURY PE1TI10N" as "'BpSSE
COMITATUS"!Hl By making a demeaning nickname like "POSSECOMffATI.J't)" shows that
Lori Fleming violated R1,1le 3.6 Affiliation with Discriminatory Organizations as she is
discriminating against the peoples "CONSTITIITIONAL RIGHT TO SIGN A PETITION'!!!
It also shows Judge Kurt Loy also knew about this and chose to conspire to umqp and
interfere into a private business contract to ruin a grand jury petition.as wdl-as\ Lori Fleming.
It shows that Kurt LoylLori Fleming both violated Rule 2.5 Competence, Diligence, and
Cooperation (A) since they are not performing their judicial and administrative duties,
competently and diligently because they are worried about a radio ad at 1:43 P.M. on
February 19, 2015 when they are both supposed to be focusing on rheirjudiciakand
i
ministerial duties. Chief Judge A.J. Wachter has now violated Rule 2.12 Supervisory Duties
(A) which says "A judge shall require court staff, court officials, and others subject to the
judge's direction and control to act in a manner consistent with the judge's obligations under
this code."
Since the "GRAND JURY PETITON" was for the purpose to impeach meH-th-district judges
I feel she violated Rule 4.1 since she is making speeches in her email to attorney
sut
Wachter about the possibility of losing her political job and she should not be calling people
"POSSE COMITATUS" 'WHICH IS A RACIAL NAZI SLUR" which the co~
of Crawford
County has been known to do in the past according to attorney Mark Fer:n:mJ:he public
court case number 14CV14P where attorney Mark Fern who filed a "MOTION TO STRIKE
THIRD-PARTY PETITION AGAINST DEFENDANTS FERN & ANGERMA YER LLC AND
STEPHEN B. ANGERMA YER AND FOR SANCTIONS" and he says on state~t
5 p~ge 2
comparing the Pro Se client to something called "Kansas Militia Members" .aad Ion statement
14 of page 6 says that the Pro Se clients tactics are what "THIS COURT' meaning
"CRAWFORD COUNTY" that this court commonly associates with the "KANSAS
MILITIA"!!!! The statement of people representing themselves being "MIliTIA" by the 11th
judicial district court is just one of the bias and prejudices and due process vio~tions that led
to the "GRAND JURY PETITION" to impeach all 11thdistrict court judges. -Maybe attorney
Mark Fern had spoken with Lori Fleming since she was one of 3 district judge members of
"the court" in the 11thjudicial district in Crawford County in 2014.when that statement was
made public when it was filed. Lori Fleming's "Posse Comitatus" statement>_~2/19/2015
against everyone who signed the grand jury petition shows an extrem~'pattem:,pf, bias,
prejudice, and slanderous demeaning nicknames of "KANSAS MILITIA" and "POSSE
COMMATATUS" for anyone who wants to represent themselves in court and possibly wants
to save themselves a lot of money from paying an attorney anywhere from $200 to $400 an
hour for nothing more than calling their old law buddy and working out~"conflict
of
interest dear which should be a violation of Rule 2.11(A).

The definition of Posse Comitatus says is also the named taken by a right wing) anti-tax
extremist group founded in 1969 by Henry L. Beach a retired dry cleaner and one time
member of the silver shirt, nazi inspired organization that was established int1te United
States after Adolph Hitler came to power in Germany. The group-openm:d'Oll.fhe belief that
the true intent of the rounders of The United States was to establish a Christian Republic
where the individual was sovereign.
Lori Fleming also failed to report Bill Wachter for lawyer misconduct for his-~parte
conversation with her on her email to him which is a violation ofRuie,.1.-tS;~ponding
to
Judicial and Lawyer Misconduct. The business contract between Summary Judgment Group
and My Town Media 100.7 ESPN was non public information that Judge Lori Fleming was
writing about with a private attorney who she previously was employed with Which violates
Rule 3.5 Use of Nonpublic Information.
The fact that both Kurtis Loy=.and-Lori:Fleming
already knew that a "GRAND JURY PETITION' was in progress by c/o EiiCMuathe and
Noah Day The Summary Judgment Group since Eric Muathe had previously sent in
complaints and showed them copies of signatures while the petition was in p;togress. The
fact that Lori Fleming even stated anything about a "radio ad to oust judges" l1,olated Rule
-!
2.10 Judicial Statements on Pending and Impending Cases. Statement-{A)-urider Rule 2.10
says "A judge shall not make any public statement that might reasonably be expected to
affect the outcome or impair the fairness of a matter pending or impending in any court, or
make any nonpublic statement that might substantially interfere with a fair ~
or hearing.
Statement (B) under Rule 2.10 says "A judge shall nor. in COnl1ection:with -C~t
controversies, or issues that are likely to come before the court, make pledges, promises, or
commitments that are inconsistent with the impartial performance of the adjudicative duties
of judicial office.
I also think it is "EXTREMELY VNETIIlCAL" for Lori Bolton Fleming~ct
Judge to
actually write a letter to attorney Bill Wachter who is a private member of Crestwood
Country Club with her, a Private member of the Catholic Church with her, he is the exrtlana~g partner ~f a law firm tha~ she was previously employ:d at and her ~band and
father-m-law previously owned at 'WILBERT AND TOWNER . 'fo make m~ers worse the
attorney Bill Wachter's brother is A.J. Wachter who is the chief 11th judicial district judge
and the one that Lori Fleming refers to on a "FIRST NAME BASIS" when she wrote "Dear
A.J." instead of Dear "Honorable A.J. Wachter" in a letter where she r~
from case
l
number 15CV04G Travis Carlton vs. Kansas Department of Revenue.
These were the exact reasons there was a grand jury petition filed on May 19,2015 to oust
the 11thdistrict judges under K.S.A. 60-1205 and K.S.A. 60-1206. The 11thdistrict court
judges all know each other personally and have economic ties together such a&}<>riBolton
Fleming used to work with A.T.Wachter and his brother Bill Wachterer ~rt
and
Towner and Judge Kurt Loy rents his building to her father-in-law- Mark Bolton's CPA firm.
I can't believe a judge actually took it upon herself to write an email to a local attorney
because Bill Wachter is the president of "100.7 ESPN MY TOWN MEDIA ~
interfere in
his economic $300 radio contract with "Summary Judgment Group"JlOt~meaning

nickname and demeaning stereotyping of being called and categorized as "POSSE
COMMA rus" which clearly violates Rule 2.4 External Influences on Judicial Conduct(A)
which says "A judge shall not be swayed by public clamor or fear of criticism," Rule 2.4(B}
"
says "A judge shall not permit family, social, political, financial, or othedme1'Fts
or
relationships to influence the judge's judicial conduct or judgment. "RUle 2.4(C) says "A
judge shall not conveyor permit others to convey the impression that any person or
organization is in a position to influence the judge.
Please have the "Disciplinary Administrator Oversight Committee~
matter
due to the conflicts of interest with the Kansas Commission on Judicial Oualifications Panel
A and Panel B have with Robert Fleming because he was the former chair on the Kansas
Commission on Judicial Qpalifications and former member of Panel B and I n~d an unbiased
committee to investigate the blatant "USURPATION OF OFFICE" by La!i~n
Fleming
who is his daughter-in-law!!
Attorney Bill Wachter also needs investigated for violations of
KRPC Rule 1.7 Conflict of Interest, KRPC Rule 1.8 Conflict of Interest Prohibited, KRPC
8.3(b) Reporting Professional Misconduct by failing to report Lori Fleming for 'Furpation of
power, and KRPC Rule 8.4(a)(b)(c)(d)(f)(g). He also lied to 'Joe Mans" of "My ]'own Media"
who called me personally "Kasey King" since I was the one who personally handed "Joe
Mans" the $300 for the contract at ''My Town Media" and informed Joe Mans to lie to me
and tell me "their FCC lawyer said the ad was a violation and it needed to be-taken off the air
immediately"! This message is recorded and is waiting to be used for "evidenci" in a possible
future civil lawsuit against "My Town Media" for damages from brearih-.of~ct,
and
deprivation of rights under Title 42 USC 1983. Their was no FCC lawyer the lawyers were
"Judge Lori Fleming", "Judge Kurt Loy", and "Attorney Bill Wachter" who usurped and help
"BREACH THE CONTRACT" between "My Town Media" and "Summary Judgment Group".
This complaint will be forwarded to the "OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY ADM~STRATOR)J,

"ATIORNEY GENERAL", AND "KANSAS INSURANCE COMMISSIDNElt~fqr a complaint
on Attorney Bill Wachter, Judge Kurt Loy, Judge A..J. Wachter, and Judge Lori Fleming's
BOND under K.S.A. 60-1205 and K.S.A. 60-1206 for conspiring and collaborating to
intentionally usurp/ intrude and interfere into a "constitutional grand jury ~tion;'
"economic contract" which should make them "UNBONDABLE" under 5.~The
and an
Uniform
Bonding Code - (UBC) which says "A judge shall lose his bonding, shall not be bonded, and
shall be deemed unbondable if he fails to protect the U.S, national constitutionally
guaranteed remedies of due process and the equal protection of the laws of the citizen
appearing in his court of law, or any citizen appearing in any court of the counv in which he
works whose case may come to his attention". I think intruding andinterrering
into a
"GRAND JURY PETITION" and "ECONOMIC RADIO ADVERTISEMENT' clearly violates

due process, clearly shows Lori Fleming engaged in willfull misconduct while on a judicial
county computer, and clearly violates any moral turpitude of a penal statute.
In re Robertson, 280 Kan. 226, 120 P.3d (2005). A district court judge -adm.itteil'violation of
the judicial districts administrative order regarding computer and internet usage when, over
an extended period of time, he used the county owned computer located in his office at the
courthouse to access and display sexually explicit images, messages, and matenrs.
The
Supreme Court found violations of Canonl, Canon 2, and Canon 4{A}(.2) .. 1lli.e ~ourt ordered
removal from office.
Lori Fleming has also violated examples of Ethic Advisory Opinions for all of her above
mentioned actions and they are the following:
In 2005 JE-128 Ajudge may not write a letter to a nominating committee ~f'djflg<the'qualifications of
a candidate since a judge shall not publicly endorse or publicly oppose a candidate for public office.
Canon SA(l). How does Lori Fleming not violate this with her e-mail to BillWachter talking about Lori
Fleming, Kurt Loy, and A.J.Wachter's position in public office which a radio ad is advert/sing to impeach.
Lori Fleming also has violated Examples of conduct To Be Improper from =:a~:~
Report of
Commission on Judicial Qualifications example number 1 which says f1A j._.
. . mily, social,
political or other relationships to influence the judge's judicial conduct or judgment and failed to
respect and comply with the taw. The juctge entered into a stipulation to ~ign, not accept a position
or serve as a judge at any future time, and submit a letter of apology to the residents..of the judicial
district. She also violated example 2 which says "Ajudge's letter to the cou.ntv attorn.eey's office could
have construed as an attempt to dictate how that office should operatell.~~"'s
cautioned
about future correspondence. This is exactly what she did in James Russians Federal Case of 14~10018~FM United States vs. James Russian by sending an email to the prosecuting attorney in that case to
keep Mr. Russian from getting ((BOND"and she also dictat~d how ((MyTo\Al~Media" should be allowed
to contract. She also violated example 7 which says "A judge was informally advised th~ it is
inappropriate to engage in ex-parte communications and further inappropriate to~
in a home rather than in a courtroom.
court matters
Ajudge should not be involved in the execution of orders in that
fashion and Lori Fleming should not have been executing orders at 01:43 P.M. on 2/19/2015 to end
Summary Judgment Groups contract with My Town Media. She also violated example number 9 on the
2003 Annual Report for Examples of Conduct Found To Be Improper which says "Ajudg6\was cautioned
to follow Canon 2C, which sets forth speech, gestures or other conduct that ootdd*~eived
by a
reasonable person as harassment. A judge is to be cautious in making comments;avOltfirig
any conduct
which may be perceived as unwelcome. I think calling us "Posse Commitatus" and ruining our radio
contract Ad with My Town Media is a violation of Canon 2C also especially since Honorable Lori Fleming
is cu~rentlY ~earing attorn~y William wachte~s cases of uWilbe~, Tow.ner, Lassman: w~~~er, and
Fleming" which her father-In-law Robert Fleming owned and L-onFleming workedwfib'1'''ham
Wachter
who is the brother of Chief Judge AJ. Wachter at "Wilbert and Towner".
Lori Fleming has also shown a behavior of conduct that past Annual yearly reports from the Kansas
Commission on Judicial Qualifications have shown as examples which are:
On the 2012 annual report examples for conduct that is improper it statestbataJudge~asfound
to
have violated Rule 1.2 by making an inappropriate joke while appearing on a radio program. The judge
was cautioned about future word choices and the importance of public perception.
If public perception
is important how inappropriate is it to have-an email floating around with slanderous names like "posse
comitatus" being said about the public people just because they wanted to sign a ~ition
FLEMING EXAMPLE".
"LORI
-,)
Another "LORI FLEMING EXAMPLE"under "IMPROPER" for 2013 says "Ajud~e was found to have
violated Rule 4.1(A}(4) anctComment {7} by running an untrue radio advertisement referencing the
judge's opponent.
statements".
The judge was cautioned to be scrupulously fair and accurate in future campaign
"SAME AS LORIINTERFERINGIN OUR RADIO AD AND CALLINGUS POSSEC?MITATUS
INSTEADOF SUMMARY JUDGMENT GROUPWHICH HERSTATEMENTWAS-WlfRl::JJ\N8-lTO THE OWNER

OF A RADIO STATION.
P.5. this is also a "KORA" request for the judicial computer to see the rest of the emaft..,c;f what Lori
Fleming sent to Bill Wachter the President of "My Town Media" accordingtotheir-~
Incorporation.
of
In case any of you have trouble reading the e-mail a more leglbte-e'-mall will be on the
computer of Lori Fleming and attorney Bill Wachter and that is why there is a need for a {'KORA" request
for the public computer it was sent from at the 11th judicial district. I was-previously involved in
complaint number DA 11, 812 "In The Matter of Eric Bruce" with The Office Of Disci~ary
and attorney "Mr. Jack Scott McInteer" ef"DEPEW GILLENM~UN &
McINTEER, L.L.C." 8301 E. 21st Street North Suite 450 Wichita, Kansas-612U6 investigated
Administrator
the matter
and "TOOK THE COMPUTER FROM ATIORNEY ERIC BRUCE TO INVESTIGATE
THE COMPLAINT"!
Kasey King, Julie Stover, and Michael King all got Judge Robert Fleming's forme~}aw partner,
AJ. Wachter, reprimanded with a "LETTEROF CAUTION" in docket numberii1"
1115, and
1116 for his inappropriate use of the term "peanut gallerv" made on June 7, 2011 and AJ.
Wachter and Lori Fleming retaliated under Rule 2.16 against all 3 of us since we all signed the
Grand Jury Petition by usurping the radio ad on his brother's radio station. Judge Wachter
should have been sent an "informed consent policy" for ongoing cases which the judge did not
recuse like the case of In re, 269 Kan. 509, 8 P.3d 686 (2000).
The complaint from the "PEANUT GALLERY"docket number 1114, 1115, and 1116 was used in
the annual 2011 example from the Kansas Commission On Judicial Qualifications in the
tlEXAMPlES OF CONDUCTFOUNDTO BE IMPROPER"when it says "Ajudge, w~ made
disparaging comment about courtroom spectators during a hearing which was--fknowledged.

by the judge and reflected in the transcript, was cautioned about
future worth:tioices"
If the computer was taken during an investigation that was for a "BAR ATTORNEYERIC
BRUCE"in DA11,812 then the 11th judicial county computer of LOri Bolton.Fleming needs
to be taken and investigated just like Mr. Jack Scott McInteer did in his thorough
investigation ofNIN THE MATTEROF ERIC BRUCE".
.j
Please conduct a thorough investigation on this complaint 'WITH THE COUNTY
COMPUTERBEING CONFISCATED"just like case number DA11,8l2 In The Matter Of Eric
Bruce.
Very truly yours,

Kasey King
r.o. Box 101

Opolis Kansas 66760
:.'
'\'1+1";IJ(l-' ..,-..l,1-":..
i!
"
,"
. .....
,'"
,/.:.~,. :~.':::'i
<,~t;:lthn? Kurt is :;C:";ii,,.gEm; MUilthe ano pc;:~',! ~olr: ..":;nt': I':'i~' ,,;: h(l ,';,
,",:"':'
.',
'.
.1.,' .~:'.
,','
,.-::-
.' ",
..
i hi-.
,"" !O'~to
U\I"\
dll thp [udges. liW011lrl just like to kl'\o'.'1 sin~e,IT",,'~ldj'.;\oI
" r.
z . ~.' .:",
;:'
\".
.s=
.....
____
"
_.
__
_~
__
-_.
..... -.
---------_.--
-'-- - .-
..
---- ,- ------"-
-~------
-" .....
'
----'
~tate of 1!ansas
~([ommission on jf umnal <laualifit~tion1l

Telephone

Topeka, Kansas 66612-1507
785-296-2913
MEMBERS
PANEL A
Facsimile 785-296-1028
OF
April 8, 2011
CHAIR:
William B. Swearer
Lawyer Member
VICE-CHAIR:
Carolyn Tillotson
Lay Member
Nancy S. Anstaen
Lawyer Member
J. Patrick Brazil
Judge Member
Theodore B. Ice
Judge Member
Kasey McCoy King

P. O. Box 101
Opolis, Kansas 66760
Re:'
Dear Mr. King:

The Commission met April 1, 2011, at which time the above-captioned
complaint
was considered. The Commission
is making further inquiry, and the matter remains
under consideration.
The matter will be placed on the Commission's
June 3, 2011,
meeting agenda.
Jennifer L. Jones
Judge Member
Cordially,
Christina Pannbacker
Lay Member
CcvuL8'~
Carol G. Green,
Secretary
SECRETARY:
Carol G. Green
Topeka, KS 66612-1507
Docket No. 1114, In the Matter of A.J. Wachter
rom
~tateOf 1!an~a~'
,~:-
Q]:ommission on gI-ubitial <mualifications

Kansas judici~LCenter
. 30] S.W. Tenth Avenue
. Telephone 785-296-2913
Topeka, Kansas
66612"-1507 .
Facsimile 785-296-) 028

-,
. .',.
MEMBERSQF.
PANEL A
June 7, 2011
CHAIR:
William B. Swearer
Lawyer Member
VICE-CHAIR:
Carolyn Tillotson
.Lay Member
Nancy S. Anstaett
. Lawyer Member
J. Patrick Brazil'
Judge Member
Theodore B. .Ice
. _ Judge Member'
Jennifer L. Jones -
Judge Member
Christina Pannbacker
- Lay Member
SECRETARY:
Carol G. Green
sor S.W. Tenth Avenue
Topeka,KS 6661i-1507
Julie Stover
303 S. Jefferson Street
Frontenac, Kansas 66763'
Re:
Docket No. 1115, In the Matter of A. J .' Wachter
Dear Ms. Stover:

The Commission
was considered.
met June 3;2011, at which time the above-captioned

.
complaint.
Judge Wachter acknowledged

and expressed regret forms
use of the term
"peanut .gallery." It was the consensus of the Commission that the judge'S use of that
term was inappropriate, and it was the decision of the Commission to caution Judge
Wachter regardingfuture
word choices.
: It was. further the decision of the Commission that the remaining allegations
contained in your complaint contained no facts evidencing judicial misconductas defined
in t):1eCode of Judlcial Conduct.
.
Thank you for bringing your concerns to the attention of the Commission.
matter is now closed.
Sincerely,
44~ . - ~ /
~~-~
William B. Swearer,
Chair
mm
. '.
This
EXAMPLES OF OONDUCT
FOUND TO BE IMPROPER
A judge was found to have violated. Rule 2.5(A) by failing to rule on a motion for
appointment of counsel for approximately one year. The judge was cautioned regarding
the importance of disposing of issues promptly and efficiently. The departmental justice
and chief judge were advised of the Commission's concern regarding delay.
A judge was found to have violated Rules 1.2 and 1.3 by throwing a cell phone not
belonging to the judge into the street and/or attempting to use the judge's position to gain
deferential treatment to prevent the filing of charges. The judge was privately ordered to
cease and desist from activities which lead to impropriety and the lnappropsiate use of the
prestige of judicial office.
A judge, who incarcerated a respondent for contempt without the respondent having
representation, was cautioned that counsel must be appointed before incarceration for
~-.1....
irect contempt. Johnson v, Johnson. 11 Kan. App. 2d 317. Syl, U (1986) was cited.
/) ~~\\)
11~,v...
A judge, who made a disparaging comment about courtroom spectators.during a hearing

K>
which was acknowledged by the judge and reflected in the transcript, was cautioned
oe~()ct1 about future word choices.
c to.\ i"'-"->6.f\ }Q -0,xe, 11 }L
/J;\
fdJt).1
A judge, who consulted with law enforcement and diScusse su

ocunwntsin a case
with one of the attorneys involved in the case, was cautioned regarding; independent
investigations and ex parte communications. Rules 2.9(A) and (C) were citer.
A judge, who failed to rule on a 60-1507 motion for approximately 15 months, was
cautioned regarding delay.
A judge, who admitted to using language occasionally which socie~ might find
offensi~e, was cautioned on the use ef offensive or inappropriate language:{U1dreminded
of the Importance of considering the public's perception of the system. 'Rule 1.2 and
Comment [3] were cited.
2011 Annual Report
~::JI~~~_
1013
f
~'r{\
/?
.D- ~'
"v--~.e"f.
f\ . f ~
vJ
().v
LLOv
i}
e....
c'
71'.~
yt
{)!VI 30'6
'-'"
In re Platt, WI Kan. 509,8 P.3d 686 (2000),

A judge of the district court followed a disqualification policy with respect to several
attorneys which involved not hearing newly tiled cases and implementation of an "informed
consent policy" for ongoing cases in which the judge did not recuse.
--' -
The Supreme ~~~~~~~SOrcmwlnS~~~~~~1J~~~~~

Court found violations 0
~}
(\c
J'{~~
E(l). The court ordered public censure.
In re Groneman,
272 Kan.1345,
38 P.3d 735 (2001}.
A district court judge allowed his administrative assistant to maintain dual employment
during courthouse hours and falsely reported time and leave information.
The respondent stipulated to violations of Canons 1, 2A, 2B, 3C(-lt,(z), and (4). The
Supreme Court ordered public censure and other conditions. including repayment to the State of
Kansas for hours not worked.
In re Robertson, 280 Kan. 266, 120 P.3d 790 (2005).
to(} e.f "'"~

{ 1r.
A district court judge admitted violation of the judicial district's ..~strative

order
regarding computer and internet usage when, over an extended period of time, he used the
coun'!y-{)wn~ computer located in bis office at the courthouse to access and display sexually
ex~s,
messages, and materials.
---....
..;;..,t- (\.
The Supreme Court found violations of Canon 1, Canon 2, and Canon 4(A)f2). The court
ordered removal from office.
';
...
In re Pilshaw, 286 Kan. 574,186 P.3d 708 (2008).

A judge of the district court was found to have lost her temper and engaged in emotional
outbursts.
The Supreme Court found violations of Canons 2A and 3B(3) afici.{4).. ; The Supreme
Court ordered public censure.
.
----------'2013
ANNuAL
REpORT.
PAGE
28a----
..
EXAMPLES OF CONDUCT
FOUND TO BE IMPROPER
Several judges were found to have violated Ru1e 1.3 by providing a statement of
endorsement which appeared in an annual report of an organization that provides medical
and behavioral healthcare, social services, and education to children and families. While
the judges did not give permission for their statements to appear in the annual report, the
judges were cautioned to be mindful and vigilant in the future to avoid statements that
may be used in unintended ways to advance the interests of others.
A judge was found to have violated Rule 2.S(A) by failing to enforce a court order which
resulted in several months' delay in settling an estate. The judge was priva~ly ordered to
cease and desist from dilatory practices which result in unnecessary rlelay~ :
to""rT'",flJ
~
?1e
if' 0:..
e:
A judge was found to have violated Rule 1.2 by making an inapQtopriate joke while
appearing o~ a radio program, The judge was cautioned about future word choices and
the importance of public perception.
'1)0 55<:: l-o TV" k v;,
A judge was found to have violated Ru1e 2.9(A) by participating in ex parte
communications regarding child visitation and Rules 1.1 and 1.2 by threatening to have a
litigant arrested. The judge was cautioned regarding ex parte communications and for
threatening the litigant with arrest without a legal basis.
A judge was found to have violated Ru1e 1.2, the appearance of impropriety, after
admitting a romantic relationship with a court employee. In cautioning. ~e judge, the
Commission emphasized the importance of maintaining a professienal relationship at the
office and the need to consider the public's perception of a judge's personal relationship
with an employee.
A judge, who was found to have violated Rule 2.S(A) by failing to rule oa,a motion for
approximately 10 months, was cautioned regarding delay.
j
A judge, who made inappropriate comments which offended a litigant during a physical
abuse hearing, was found to have violated Rule 2.8(B). The comments were reflected in
the transcript, and the judge was cautioned regarding word choices.
A judge was found to have violated Rules l.3 and 4.1(B)(2) by endorsing a political
candidate for office on the candidate's Facebook page by "liking" a comment. The judge
was privately ordered to cease and desist from publicly endorsing a candidate for any
public office.
2012 Annual Report
IMPROPER
A judge was found to have violated Rule 2.4 b?, dismissing, o~t of. p~fessional
courtesy, a traffic ticket for a known attorney appeanng before tae J~
Without the
district attorney's consent or knowledge. The judge" was cautioned-not {()permit external
influences to affect the judge's judicial conduct or judgments.
A judge was found to have violated Rule 2.3(B) by making impropeqcomments of

a sexual nature to a female attorney appearing before the judge, \V.hiJethtfjudge sent a
letter of apology to the female attorney and opposing counsel present at the time, the
judge was privately ordered to cease and desist from making inappropriate comments.
A judge, who was found to have violated Ru1e 2.5(A) by failing, to rule on a
motion for approximately thirty-one months, was cautioned regarding delay.!
A judge; who was found to have violated Rule 1.2 by making an inappropriate
gesture and comment during a court hearing that could have been construed as a religious
reference, was privately ordered to cease and desist from improper conduct which creates
the appearance of impropriety.
'\ Lle~~I1-~
C"
A judge was found to have violated Rule 4.I(A)(4) and Comment [7J by running
VU \ \ ;f: an ~true radio ~rtisement
referencing the judge's opponent.
The judge was
(f'd--A
cautioned to be scrupulously fair and accurate in future campaign statements.
1 A'("
e.
A judge, who was found to have violated Rule 1.2 by miling "inappropriate
comments in court regarding the Kansas Appellate Courts, was privately ordered to cease
and desist from improper conduct which creates the appearance of impropriety.
----------20I3A.NNuALREpORT.
PAGE 23;-----
-..
,"
F'L~En
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF CRAWFORD
Community National Bank & Trust,
Plaintiff,
COUN
I t;f<ANSAS
14 HAR 14 P2:04
) 1'/ ri)~( (':,-:D" -,'

.. ' .
) ';'.~.-)._A'W.~I":!""~"
\'~
'-h' ',I>t
'(
bY _..__
Case No. 14 CV 14 P
)
..
---- -
v.
--
James A. Beckley, Jr., and the unknown

heirs, executors, administrators, devisees,
trustees, creditors and assigns of such of
the defendant as may be deceased and
the unknown spouses of the defendant;
)
}
)
)
)
the unknown officers, successors, trustees,)
creditors and assigns of such defendant

)
as are existing, dissolved or dormant
}
corporations; the unknown executors,
}
administrators, devisees, trustees,
)
creditors, successors and assigns of such )
defendant as are or were partners or in
)
partnership; and the unknown guardians,
}
conservators, and trustees of such of the
)
defendant as are minors or are in
)
anywise under legal disability; and the
)
unknown heirs, executors, administrators,
)
devisees, trustees, creditors, and assigns of)
any person alleged to be deceased.
J
)
Defendants.
~~--~~~~~~--=--------)
PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 60 OF
KANSAS STATUTES
ANNOTATED
MOTION TO STRIKE THIRD-PARTY PETITION AGAINST DEFENDANTS

FERN & ANGERMAYER
LLC AND STEPHEN 8. ANGERMA YER
AND FOR SANCTIONS
Come now third-party
Angerrnayer
defendants
Fern & Angermayer.
LLC and Stephen B,
by and through their attorney Mark E. Fern and for their motion to strike
the third-party petition against them and for sanctions state:

1. Plaintiff, Community
National Bank & Trust, a financial institution,

1
organized
existing. and doing business under and

against the defendant
foreclose
by virtue of law. filed a petition in this action
James A. Beckley Jr. for defaulting on a promissory
note and to
security interest.
2. The defendant,
James A. Beckley, Jr., was properly served and filed a pro-se
answer to the plaintiff's petition.

3. Defendant Beckley filed apro-se,
third-party complaint
believed were involved in the suit. He made third-party allegations

for the plaintiff bank, Stephen 8. Angermayer
Tony Stonerock,
against all parties he

against the attorney
and his firm. the president of the bank,
and the sheriff's deputy, Robert Peters, who served the defendant
with
the summons and petition.
4. The third-party defendant alsofiled complaints against all third-party

defendants with various regUlatory authorities.
He filed a complaint against bank's
counsel with the Kansas Office of Disciplinary Administrator,

with the Comptroller
against the Bank President
"a c\
of Currency, and against the sheriff's deputy with the crawtoro
u) {\
County Sheriff's Department.
C\
5. Third-party
defendant
tactics. as set out above, mirror what this court has
received in prior cases from Kansas Militia members.
,,0....~
.,,\ eS I:.
~{~t'N
6. The statute on third-party
practice states as follows:
Statute 60-214: Third-party
practice.
(a) When defendant may bring in third
petty. At any time after commencement of the action a defending party, as a

third-party plaintiff, may cause a summons and petition to be served upon a
person not a party to the action who is or may be liable to the third-party plaintiff
for all or part of the plaintiff's claim against the third-party plaintiff. The third-party
plaintiff need not obtain leave to make the service if the third-party plaintiff files
the thir~-party p~tition not la~er.than 10 day~ after serving t~e original answer.
Otherwise the third-party plaintiff must obtain leave on motion upon notice to all
parties to the action. The person served with the summons and third-party
)0 ',l \~
o; '{ ~
'\p'"
~R.. 'li"
,,{'
0..,,0---
1\o,
~~e...'
petition, hereinafter called the third-party defendant, shall make any defenses to
the third-party plaintiffs claim as provided in K.SA 60-212 and amendments
thereto and any counterclaims against the third-party plaintiff and cross-claims
against other third-party defendants as provided in K.S.A. 60-213 and
amendments thereto. The third-party defendant may assert against the plaintiff
any defenses which the third-party plaintiff has to the plaintiffs claim. The third~
party defendant may also assert any claim against the plaintiff arising out of the
transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of the plaintiifs claim against
the third-party plaintiff. The plaintiff may assert any claim against the third-party
defendant arising out of the transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter
of the plaintiff's claim against the third-party plaintiff, and the third-party
defendant thereupon shalf assert any defenses as provided in K.S.A. 60-212 and
amendments thereto and any counterctakns and cross-claims as provided in
K.S.A. 60-213 and amendments thereto. Any party may move to strike the thirdparty claim, or for its severance or separate trial. A third-party defendant may
proceed under this section against any person not a party to the action who is or
may be liable to the third-party defendant for all or part of the claim made in the
action against the third-party defendant.
7. It should be noted that the defendant Beckley has not served either of the
movarvts with a summons and third-party
petition.
8. Alseike v. Miller, 196 Kan. 547 549-50, 412 P.2d 1007 (1966) is an early and
oft-cited case in area of third party practice. The Miller court held as follows:
It may first be noted that this statute pertains to procedure only and does not
create any substantive rights. The statute relates generally to the subject of
reimbursement!
indemnity or contribution,
but it creates no substantive right
to the same. There must be some substantive basis for the third-party claim
before one can utilize the procedure of 214 (a). Third-party practice is simply
a permissive procedural device whereby a party to an action may bring in an
additional party and claim against such party, because of a claim that is being
asserted against the original party. It has been said that the general purpose of
the practice is to avoid circuity of action and to dispose of the entire subject
matter arising from one set of facts in one action, thus administering complete
and even-handed justice expeditiously and economically (see 1A Barron and
Holtzoff, Third-Party Practice, 422, p. 644)(emphasis added) {d.
9. The Miller court went on to further hold:

In order to come under 214 (a) the defendant's claim against the third-party
defendant must be such that the latter "is or may be liable to him for all or part of
,~
the plaintiff's claim against him." The advisory committee for our present code of
civil procedure had this to say with respect to the section:
"Although it is the purpose of the provision to permit the entire controversy in a

single proceeaing to be determined, it is only the liability of the third-party
defendant to the original defendant for the original defendant's liability to the
pJaintiffthat;s
to be determined." (Gard's Kansas Code of Civil Procedure,

Notes, p. 74.)
Advisory Committee
Id. @550.
10. The Kansas Supreme Court interpreted
this statute in a following
case. In
Russell v, Community Hospital Association, tnc., 199 Kan. 251,428 P.2d 783 (1967)
the court held:
"In order to come within the provisions of 60-214 (a), supra, the third-party
plaintiffs' claim against the third-party
may be liable to the third-party
11. The third-party
defendants
must be such that the latter are or
plaintiffs for all or part of plaintiff's claim against them."
plaintiff has made claims against the movants
answer to the petition which he labels "Counter-Claim."

bringing a claim against Fern & Angermayer,
He clearly states that he is
LLC in accordance
with KSA 60-214 (a).
He appears to make a claim under what is labeled "Count 4 Wrongful

wherein he claims that Stephen B. Angermayer
in his pro-se
Credit Reporting"
allegedly lied to him over signing a quit-
cfaim deed on real estate and alleges a notary was not present. He also claims that Mr.
Angermayer
informed
In "Count6
him that his credit would not be "hurt" by such signing.
Conflict of Interest" third-party plaintiff alleges that a conflict of
interest is created by his complaint
against the Comptroller
allegedly waiting for the outcome of the complaint.

claim in "Count 4" again making allegations
of Currency and he is
He then expounds
on the earlier
regarding his signing a deed and his
negative credit history.
12, It is clear that third-party plaintiff Beckley has made claims which; in addition
to bearing no basis in fact, are not related in any way to the main claim the plaintiff bank
has against Beckley. His claim must in some way show that the "third-party plaintiffs'
claim against the third-party
the third-party plaintiffs
defendants are such that the latter are or may be liable to
for af{
or part of plaintiffs claim against them."
The case in chief was brought by the plaintiff bank for payment default on a
promissory note and security agreement. In addition to suing on the note, the bank
seeks to recover its collateral.
It cannot be demonstrated
Mr. Beckley's payment default
is somehow related to his alleged claims that he signed a deed without a
notary
present. Further, his recent default is the sole reason for his damaged credit history.
The statue does not create a substantive right where one does not exist at law,
13. Third-party
plaintiff must comply KSA 60-211.
The statute states in relevant
part:
(b) The signature of a person constitutes a certificate by the person that the
person has read the pleading, motion or other paper and that to the best of the
person's knowledge, information and belief formed after an inquiry reasonable
under the circumstances:
(1) It is not being presented for any improper purpose, such as to harass or
to cause unnecessary delay or needless increase in the cost of litigation;
(2)
the claims, defenses and other legal contentions
therein are warranted
by existing law or by a nonfrivolous argument for the extension, modifica1ion or

reversal of existing law or the establishment
of new law;
(3) the allegations and other factual contentions have evidentiary support
or, if specifically so identffied, are likely to have evidentiary support after a
reasonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery; and
(4)
the denials of factual contentions are warranted on the evidence or, if
specifically so identified
are reasonably based on a lack of information or belief.
~~r
(VI Uoi'K r;ff' '5\;0 w5 A,,-,s c~r.(e<.hu~~1-:;$')~
{I d W#<t i.
?t>('; (-Ie"" ~ oJ., k tlrt
14. The Third-party

of harassment
plaintiff has interposed the third-party
--
~"lkoI V $r, f>.55e-14.w:14 s 1,
.I> ';
claim for the purpose
and delay. His tactics are what this court commonly associates
Kansas Militia. Their pleadings
...
are typically filed pro-se with a convoluted
reference to
Kansas statutes. Often the alleged facts are untrue, and the Militiq's hallmark
.extreme anti-government
-~
ideology along with elaborate conspiracy
with the
'
is an
theories.
'.
15. In Wood v. Groh, 269 Kan. 420, 431, 7 P.3d 1163 (2000) the court listed the
following factors to be considered
by the court when awarding sanctions
against a party
who violates KSA 60-211 :
(1) whether the improper conduct was willfu! or negligent;

(2) whether it was part of a pattern of activity or an isolated event;
(3) whether it infected the entire pleading or only one particular count or
defense;
(4) whether the person has engaged in similar conduct in other litigation;
(5) whether it was intended to injure;
(6) what effect it had on the litigation process in time or expense;
(7) whether the responsible person is trained in the law;
(8) what amount. given the financial resources of the responsible person, is
needed to deter that person from repetition in the same case; and
(9) what amount is needed to deter similar activity by other litigants.
Id.
16. The movants
request that the court find the Third-party
plaintiff has filed his
third-party claim in violation
of KSA 60-211, and awards them attorney's
this response and attending
any subsequent
WHEREFORE,
Third-Party
fees forfiling
hearings in this matter.
Defendants,
by reason of the matters above set forth
above. are entitled to have the third-party claims against them dismissed with prejudice.
The movants are entitled to an award of attorney's fees for defending
any subsequent
hearings.
this action and for
and for such other relief that the court deems proper.
#13812
Ma
FER &1\
MAYER, l.L.C.
107 West
Street
P.O. Box 6
Pittsburg, K s s 66762-0686
(620) 231-730
FAX (620) 231-1033
Attorneys for Third-Party
CERTIFICATE
Defendants.
OF SERVICE
This is to certify that on this 14th day of March, 2014, a true and correct copy of the
above and foregoing Motion To Strike Third-Party Petition Against Defendants Fern &
Angermayer LLC And Stephen B. Angermayer and for Sanctions was deposited in the
United States Mail, postage prepaid and properly addressed to the following:
James Beckley, Jr.
302 West McKay

Frontenac, KS 66763
#13812
ProseCl.tOr:Jujicial recusals fran cases don't happen often ICJOnIinacom
7/1S.2015
Join Now Activate Sign In
Posted: July 27, =1014 3:59pm

By Ann Marie Bush
ann.bush@cjonline.com
While the Kansas Office of Judicial Administration doesn't keep statistics on how often judges
recuse themselves from cases, Shawnee County chief deputy district attorney Jacqie Spradling
said it doesn't happen often.
Shawnee County District Judge Mark Braun recused hjmseJf Friday from the capital murder
trial of phillip D. Cheatham Jr., who was originally sentenced to death for the 2003 shooting
deaths of two Topeka women. Police say the shootings were drug-related.
The Kansa,s Supreme Court overturned the sentence jn 2013; citing ineffective assistance of
counsel Cheatham is to have a new trial on the charges.
There have been 82 motions filed in the case - Spradling had six three-ring binders filled with
them and responses in court with her Friday. All motions, including 37 of whicll haveaIready
been argued, will have to be argued again in front of a new judge.
"Both parties want the same thing - to make sure the defendant gets ,a fair trial," Spradling
said.
While the state and the defense want the defendant to get a fair trial, Spradling said a recusal
does pose problems, such as a waiting for a new judge to be appointed, motions having to be
argued again and court dates having to be rescheduled.
In February 2009, then-Shawnee County District ,Judge Charles Andrews Jr. recused himself
from hearing the county's lawsuit against former District Attorney Robert Hecht. In that case,
Andrews told attorneys for both sides he had information that posed a conflict of interest and
created a basis for him to recuse himself.
Andrews, who died in 2012, also recused himself in, March 2010 from hearing a lawsuit filed
against the city of Topeka by Jim and Sharon Suwa1slci.The Suwalskis were asking a judge to
overturn a ruling made earlier that found Jim Suwalski violated the city's clean air ordinance.
In a March 2010 article about Andrews recusing himself, Andrews, who became a district judge
in 1990, said he had "probably recused himself from 10 or 15 cases in which he was close
enough to someone involved that he didn't think it would be fair for him to bear the case.
In June 2013, Shawnee County District Couft Jut!ge Ma:ty Mattivi denied a motion. to recuse
herself from the trial of William Mal'Otta, a Topeka man who answered a Craigslist ad in which
two Topeka ","Omenwere seeking a sperm donor.
In Cheatham's case, he filed a judicial eomplaint against Bt/nm. Cheatham's complaint stems
from the judge in May promising a fair trial before be had ruled on motions. Cheatham
contends defense motions, which include a challenge to the state's death penalty, require the
trial to be dismissed.
Braun in court said he hadn't received official word of the complaint. However, he went ahead
and recused himself so there would be no question later.
Braun said because it is a death penalty case, he wants there to be an "orderly and fair
resolution.
Chief Judge Evelyn Wilson will have to appoint a new judge to the case.
"T"
Proseator: Judicial recusals from cases don't happen oIten ICJOriine.com
7/19r.2015
Lisa Taylor, spokeswoman for the Kansas judiciary, said the state doesn't track recusals. She
also noted there wasn't a public file available on Cheatham's complaint against Braun.
Complaints don't become public until after a particular point in the process, she said.
There were a total of 183 complaints filed last year, according to the ~013 Commission of
Judicial QualificationS' annual report. The complaints become undoeketed or docketed.
Undocketed complaints are dismissed with a letter to the complainant and to the judge. Of the
183 complaints filed last year, 30 were officially docketed, which means a panel thought
further investigation was warranted.
The most common complaint filed in
2013
was the defendant was denied a fair hearing.
Between 2009 and 2013, the highest number of complaints received was 217 in 2011, the
report stated. Twenty-two were docketed. The highest number of docketed complaints occurred
in 2012, when there were 44 docketed.
Ann Marie Bush can be reached at (785) 295-1207 or ann.bush@cjonline.com.
Follow Ann Marie on Twitter @AnnieScribe.
The Topeka CapiW,JO\lI:nal
@Z015. All Righw Resen'tXl.
User Agreement and Privacy Policy
CLOSE}(
About Our Ads
Terms of Service
Copyright Notice
Contact Us
-e "
W'-"'~
&;0
~~
':"""'"7""g':'
",~
IN THE DIS~Rlt~"'dotJRf
Travis Carlton, Scott COff"aI)\UG
and Bekah Harlan,
-
OF CRAWFORD
29 A10:12
Plaintiffs;
Ci ERK Of DIS T. COU2 i

CRAWFeRD COliN f'r'
8Y
.
vs.
COUNTY, KAl"ISAS
Toby Miller,
Case No. 2014 CV 7 P

Defendant.
ORDER
The judge assigned to the above captioned case, Kurtis 1. Loy, presented the attached
letter to me August 21st, 2014. The letter of Travis Carlton to the Commission on Judicial
"Qualifications referenced in Judge Ley's letter to me is also attached.
Judge Loy construed Mr. Carlton's letter as a motion to disqualify Judge Loy as the judge
assigned to the above litigation, and as such forwarded it to me as Chief Judge.
The procedure to disqualify ajudge is set forth in K.S.A. 20-311d. To the extent that Mr.
Carlton intended his letter to be amotion to disqualify Judge Loy, I find that it does not comply
with the requirements of K.S.A. 20-311 d for various reasons, one of which is that it does not
contain any averments of the author.
If Mr. Carlton's letter did comply with the requirements ofK.S.A. 20-311d, I would be
required to determine the legal sufficiency of the allegations (K.S.A. 20-311d (c)). However, the
allegations of the Carltonletter do not-suggest that Judge Loy served a prior counsel for any
party to the litigation (K.S.A. 20-311d (c)(1)); that Judge Lay is related to any party (K.S.A. 20311d (c)(3)); or, that Judge Loy is a material witness in the action (K.S.A. 20-311d (c)(4)). The
remaining allegations of the Carlton letter furnish no basis for concluding that Judge Loyhas an
interest in the litigation (K.S.A. 20-311 d (G)(2 or that Judge Loy has a personal bias or
prejudice or interest in the action that would prevent any ofthe parties from obtaining a fair and
impartial trial (K.S.A. 20-311d (c)(5)).
Accordingly, to the extent that Mr. Carlton's letter constitutes a motion to recuse Judge
Loy from the above captioned litigation, such motion is denied for the reasons set forth herein.
It is so Ordered.
AJ. Wachter
District Judge
Copy to:
Hon. Kurtis 1. Loy
District Judge
602 N. Locust'
Pittsburg. KS 66762
Travis Carlton
1410 N. Smelter
Pittsburg, KS 66762
Bekah Harlan
P.O. Box 84
Opolis, KS 66760
Toby Miller
Vapor Stop LLC
2530 Main
Parsons, KS 67357
Scott Cochran
th
709 W. 8
Pittsburg, KS 66762
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing document was
deposited in the United States Mail, postage prepaid and properly addressed to the above party or
parties on the Qlq day of
~(j
, 2014.
KAl~SASDISTRICT COURT
Eleventh Judicial District
Chambers of
KURTIS I. LOY
District Judge
Administrative Assistants
Mary Ann Forsythe
Elaine Bradshaw
Crawford County Judicial Center

602 North Locust
(620) 231-3570
(620) 231-0584 FAX
Clerk of the Court

Pamela Hicks
(620) 231-0380
Court Administrator
Mac Young
(620) 231-0310
August 21,2014
The Hon. AJ. Wachter
Chief Judge, ~Ith Judicial District
602 N. Locust
Pittsburg, KS 66762
Re: Travis Carlton, et.al. v. Toby Miller Case No. 2014CV7P
Dear Judge Wachter:
I am forwarding to you a letter from The Commission on Judicial Qualifications dated
August 18, 2014, with an enclosed complaint filed July 18, 2014 from Travis Carlton, a pro se
litigant in the above referenced case.
Although this was filed as a complaint after reading the complaint filed by Mr. Carlton, it
appears this is actually more in the form of a Motion to Disqualify Judge.
Ido not believe that Ihave any bias or prejudice against Mr. Carlton, but Iwould like to
present this complaint or motion to you for consideration.
I do not necessarily agree with the statements of Mr. Carlton where Mr. Carlton states:
"Honorable Loy stated at our case management conference that usually in cases like this if both
parties had an attorney this case would already be settled. Judge Loy said that he could set up a
mediation between myself and Toby Miller and Vapor Stop with Honorable AJ Wachter and
Honorable Lori Fleming." While Iregularly encourage settlement of cases, mediation would
have been on a voluntary basis with a mediator that was agreeable to all parties concerned. Ido
agree to facilitate or make arrangements with one of the local judges for mediation if all parties
agree. That was apparently a miscommunication or misunderstanding between Mr. Carlton and
myself.
Washington's
Cigar Store, Inc., was in operation from June 1987 until August 1990, and
the corporate charter was kept alive through December 1996. Washington's Cigar Store, Inc.,
was located at 114 W. 4th St., Pittsburg, KS, an address which no longer exists. The case that
Mr. Carlton has filed has been filed as a breach of contract action and has nothing to do with the
use or nonuse of vapor cigars or vapor cigarettes. For the record I am not opposed to the use or
sale of vapor cigars or vapor cigarettes.
I was sworn in as a District Court Judge in October, 2013. I am aware that there remain a
few instances where my name is still listed as resident agent for various corporations Iformerly
assisted while in the private practice of law. Those are all being wound down and as the new
annual reports are filed the new resident agent is listed on the records of the Kansas-Secretary of
State. I am not involved with my wife in a partnership located at 112 W. 4th St. in Pittsburg. My
wife and I hold ownership of the commercial building located at 112 W. 4th St. in Pittsburg
within a Kansas partnership. I do not accept assignment of cases involving my former law
partner.
While I do believe I am neither biased nor prejudiced concerning the parties to this
litigation or any attorneys which may become involved in the future I am forwarding this letter
and complaint to your attention for proper handling.
Kurtis 1. Loy
District Judge
KIL:maf
Enc.
"
Q[ommission on J/ubitial ~ualifttations

KANSAS JUDICIAL CENTER
301 SW TENTH AVE., ROOM 374
TOPEKA, KANSAS 66612
785.2962913
judicialqual@l.scourts.org
August 18,2014
MEMBERS OF
PANEL A
Honorable Kurtis 1. Loy
Crawford County Judicial Center
602 N. Locust
CHAIR:
WJliam B. Swearer
La-wyer Member
VICE CHAIR:
Christina M. Pann1acl~er
Lay Member
Complaint filed 'by Travis Carlton
Re:
Dear Judge Loy:

Nancy S. Anstaett
La-wyer Member
The Commission met August 1, 2014 at which time the above-captioned

complaint was considered. See attached. It was the decision of the Commission that,
based on present showing, the complaint contained no facts evidencing judicial
misconduct as defined in the Code of Judicial Conduct.
J. Patricl~ Bra~il
Judge Member
Brenda Cameron
Judg~ Member
while this complaint is sent for your information only, the Commission
thought it may be helpful for you to review the Judicial Ethics AdvisoryOpinions
at
www.kscourts.org
arid the articles which related to situations a new judge may
encounter, including. how to wind up a .law practice, which were sent to you on
September 23, 2013; .
.Mary Thrower
Judge Memher
Valdenia C. Winn
Lay Member
Sincerely,
SECRETARY:
Heather L. Smith
--
--
- ---
- -.
--
----
--
---wiHiarrrB:--Swearer;Chair
mm
Enclosure
--
--
-.-
-_'
._.
RECEIVED
COP
.JUL 1 8 2014
THIS COMPLAINT IS AGAINST HONORABLE Kurt Loy crawMfIEfL!U.

QCAL!FIC.'.:-l~;:;:;
County 11th Judicial District Judge. Case number 2014CV7P Travis
Carlton et al, vs. Toby Miller and Vapor Stop.
Iwould like to make a complaint against Crawford County District Judge

Honorable Kurt Lay. He has been assigned to be the judge in case number
2014CV7P. Ihad a hearing in this case where Iam Pro Se and the attorney
for Mr. Toby Miller is Troy Unruh from Wilbert & Towner in Pittsburg
Kansas.
Honorable Loy stated at our case management conference that usually in
cases like this if both parties had an attorney this case would already by
settled. Judge Loy said that he could set up a mediation between myself
and Toby Miller and Vapor Stop with Honorable A.J. Wachter and
Honorable Lori Fleming.
Both Honorable Wachter and Honorable Fleming were previously
employed at Wilbert & Towner. Icould never get a fair mediator when the
mediators used to be employed by the Law Firm that-is representing Mr.
Miller and Vapor Stop.
It also shows on the Secretary of States websites for resident agents that
Honorable Kurtis Loy was the resident agent for "WASHINGTQN'S
CIGAR STORB, INC.". The GlSe that 1filed has to do with vapor cigarettes
and that isa conflict of.interest because he was the resident agent.fora
cigar store. There have been numerous issues about the goveIT\1Ilent trying
to legislate vapor shops out of business and anya...rtewoo has previously or
is currently in business and or has been a resident agent for cigar or
cigarette store would- definitely have a biased and a prejudiced against
anyone who opened a vapor shop.
I also think it is wrong and a conflict of interest for Honorable Kurtis Loy to
be the resident agent of LOY & SAGEHORN, LLC. And L & T Partnership
where both addresses are 112 W. 4th in Pittsburg Kansas 66762.
It shows on Honorable Loy's Judicial Financial Disclosure Report that he
and his spouse have a partnership at 112 W. 4th in Pittsburg Kansas and the
commercial loan is with Commerce Bank.
Judge Wachter and Judge Fleming would never rule against Loy&
Sagehom & Harding when the address for that law firm is 114 W. 4th in
Pittsburg Kansas where Judge Loy has the building in a partnership and
this is a conflict of interest. Judge Loy and Judge Wachter would never
rule against Kyle Fleming of If THE FLEMING LAW FIRM!! since he is the
husband of Honorable Lori Fleming.
HOW IS ANYONE
IN CRAWFORD
COUNTY SUPPOSE TO GET A FAIR
HEARING UNLESS YOU HAVE WILBERT AND TOWNER! LaY &

SAGEHORN
& HARDING,
OR THE FLEMING LAW FIRM AS YOUR
ATIORNj3Y?
Iwould greatly appreciate an out of county judge who is unbiased and
does not have conflicts of interests with other judges like Judge Wacther ..
Judge Loy, and Judge Fleming have between them and their previous law
firms. Please send all correspondence to Travis Carlton, 1410 N .. Smelter,
Pittsburg, Kansas 66762. Please disqualify Honorable Loy from this case in
accordance to Rule 2.11(A) of the RULES RELATING TO JUDICIAL
CONDUCT.
Sincerely,
Travis Carlton
Travis Carlton
1410 N. Smelter
Pittsburg Kansas 66i62
JUDICIAL FINj\.i~CIAL
DISCLOSURE REpORT
...
::::::i
A TIN:
'"f..
&
.
DlSCLOS{JRE
REPORTING
30151\' 10m AVE., R.OOM 374

TOPEK. ., Kll.!'1SAS 66612
785-296-29!3
.~
FINANCIAL
judicialqual@kscoi.rrts.Mg
CALENDAR YEAR 2013.

REpORT REQUlRED BY SUPREME COURT RULE 60 lB REL. ..
TING TO
JuDICIAL CO:-<DUCT CA1'iO~ 3. Rls'lE 3..151B,(2013 KAI'. cr. R. A\lNOT.74S1
n.e.
...
The instructions accompanying this form are a guide to be followed in preparing your annual
financial disclosure report. Please read the instructions and review Supreme Court Rule 601B,
Rules 3.12, 3.13, 3.14. and 3.15 and their Comments (2013 Kan. Ct, R. Annot. 754-758) before
completing this form.
Complete all parts, checking "NONE" wherever you bavc no reportable information, This. report
must be typed, and an on-line fillable form is available at www.kscourts.org,
Completed and
signed reports may be submitted by U.S. mail tothe .address reflected above or may be scanned
and subrniucd by e-mail to jl.ldicialqua1@kscourts.org,
ON OR BEFORE ApRIL
15.2014.
Kurtis I; Lay
Crawford
Q'UlltyxCity
. Crawford County District COIl[{, Div, 5. Eleventh Judicial District

602 N. Locust, Pittsbu.rg, KS. 66762
620-231-3570
Girl'. Sute, Zip Co:!e
Type ofJudge
Telephone Number
(ci>cl:>"J:
__
Supreme Court
District
__
__
Court of Apoeals
District Magistrate
Senior
__
Pro Tempore
__
Municipal:
0 Full-Time 0 Part-Time
LCOMPENSATION
[reporting individual (1:); and spouse (S) or domestic partner (DP); for
Hoooraria, reporting individual (l) only; see Section I of Instructions and Rule 3.J5(A)(l).]
___
NONE (No reportable Compensation)
Date
Name of Pavor
Jan-Dec., 2013
Jan-Dec., 2013
Nov-Dec., 2013
....;
Pavee n.S.Df'}
Loy & Sagehorn, LLC

Coldwell Banker
Lay. Sagehom
Hardlng.LLC
s:
'i-
C () l\)- it c.: / Lo'1

\. \ ?.-
CJ~,,~
4. '\J"J\.
eCtf)1~rG-
s
I
Nature ofActivi.tv
Former Law Practice
Realtor
Fonner Law Practice
~~ b ",~t~~~",
~~~{~st
FDR + CY20l3
I P"ge
11. FEES AND COM1\USSIONS

see Section
n of Instructions
[reporting individual (I) and spouse (S) or domestic partner (DP);

and Rule 3.15(A)(2).]
.x;
NONE (No reportable Fees and Commissionst

Pavce (L S. DP)
Name ofClit:rtt or Customer
Ill. OWNERSHIP
INTERESTS
[reporting individual (1), spouse (S) or domestic partner (DP),
dependent child or dependent step child (DC); see Section Ill of Instructions and Rule 3.15{A){3).J
__
A
~
NONE (No reportable Ownership Interests
Business Name and Address
Tvpe of Business
(List address only-if not publicly traded)
L & TPartnership
Commercial
Held by Whom
Description of
Intc(csts Held
(L S. DP.DO
C~
Bldg. Rental
112 W. 4th
Pinsburg, KS. 66762
Farm - Crawford Cry, Ks,
Farm Rental
Owner
i.s
T.D. Ameritrade
Brokerage
IRA
IV. GIFTS. LOA.'liS,
BEQUESTS. BENEFITS. OR OTHER THL~GS OF VALUE [reporting

individual CQ, spouse (S) or domestic partner (DP), dependent child or dependent step child (DC);
see Section 1V of Instructions and. Rules 3.13. and 3.15(4).]
~NON"E:
(No reportable Gifts, Loans, Bequests. Benefits, or Other Things of Value;

Recipient (LS,DP.DC)
Description
FOR. CY2013
I Pai"
,I'::
v.
[reporting individual (I) only; see Section V ofInstruetions
POSITIONS
___
NONE (Nothing to report)

Position Held
Name ofBusiness/OrganizalionlEntity
Loy
and Rule 3. I5 (A)(6).]
&. Sagehorn,
LLC
C,_-=- & T Partnership
112 W. 4th. P,O, Box 8, Pittsburg, KS.

112 W. 4th, Pittsburg, KS.
------.'l
'P'-.
---.. .
Partner
~~~
306 W. Euclid, Pittsburg, KS.
Clerk.Vestry
7th & Broadway, Pittsburg, KS.
Chairman of foundation
Kansns Bar Foundation
120D SW Harrison, Topeka, KS.
Trustee
Kansas Bar Assoc.
1200 SW Harrison, Topeka, KS.
Chairman Fee Dispute
St.Peter's Episcopal Church
Member
Stilwell Heritage & Educational
Foundation
Bd,
Resolution Committee
Vi. LIABILITIES (reporting individual (1), spouse (S) or domestic partner (DP), dependent child or
dependent step child (DC); see Section VI of Instructions and Rule 3.15(A)(7).]
__
NO~'E(No reportable Liabilities)
Creditor
Description
G;:r~,
/ Commercial
loans
University Bank
1,S
Unsecured Loan
Amerian Express
T,S
Revolving charge
FDR,. CY2013! Pa~e3
VH. ADDITIONAL
~.I
'!I
o.a.rv"b
<..,/ 2/
.
Date
JNFORt"[-\TION OR EXPLANATlONS
J-O
(1l1dicatesectioll o/Report)
t",IV--:
Signature ofReporting
Jud~
Judge DooaId R Ndam receives retirement gifts Gate House
712412015
TIm MOlU\lKG
~r~,..!CNIhowt~""'1Rl<i
Snx
By NIKKI PATRICK
March
31. 2012 12:01AM
Judge Donald R. Noland receives retirement gifts

.----------- -- --- ------ ---- -- - -- - -------------_ .. _------ ------------ -------- -- ... -------If the Honorable Donald R. Noland wants to rock, he can do it in the new rocldng chair presented to him Friday by representatives from the Crawford County
Bar Association.
If the Honorable Donald R. Noland wants to rock, he can do it in the new rocking chair presented to him Friday by representatives
from the Crawford County Bar Association.

The gift was made during a reception in recognition of his retirement as district court judge, llthJudicia1 District.
The retiring judge also received a framed certificate from the Kansas Supreme Court. pr~ted
by Justice lee A. Johnson.
A Pittsburg State University graduate who obtained his juris doctor from Washburn University, Noland practiced law from 1976
until he was appointed as ajudge in 1991.
The Hon. AJ. Waclrter noted that, in "The Godfather" movie, the heads of the various crime families attended the funeral of Mafia
don Vito Corleone not so much out of respect but to be sure that he was dead.
"We are here bemuse we have come to respect our Don as a jurist, citizen and consummate gentleman," Wachter said. "He can
explain to us how many bass or other species of fish he's going to catch in his retirement or whether his wife and his Harley will be
able to withstand it."
PHOTOi
COURTESY PHOTO
Attorneys Steve Angermaye:rand Mark Fern represented the Crawford County Bar Association.
"1have referred to Judge Noland as 'Judge Search Engine, = Fern said. "We \\-"Quldsay, 'Judge, Lhave tlrls case,' and he would say, 'Come on in,' and he'd have
that case. What we will miss iStlilitpreparedness. JudgeNoland isalways just a little bit better prepared than yon are. For the past'three
since he's talked
about retiring, fve tried to talk him out of it."
years;-
wk ~
'1 ,
Angermayer has appreciated Noland's approachability, and credited the judge with playing a big part in shaping his career.
J.')}\ 0 vJ
"Iwas introduced to Judge Noland, and two days later I was at his house watching pro wrestling," he said.
When it was his turn to speak. Noland handed out praise of1riSown. ""- .-::0
~ C,
-",~T
't'S
~c~(
~
()(\'l ,\ '(\<2,;;
t\". -,hr7-\O<\~O\(I'l
_.\-\
c~\
'v
"This part of the state has been blessed with judges so good to work with, good hard-working, fair judges," he said. "I also want to thank the clerl<sin Girard.
The attorneys know that the clerks run the court. 1have truly enjoyed working with the attorneys. Our attorneys here stack up against the best attorneys in the
state."
The retiringjudge was most gratified by his work with the Juvenile Court, which worl<sto reunite families wbenappropriate.
"That's where you have the chance to do the most good," Noland said. "Kansas has a fundamentally good system and we have a good team with the guardian ad
litem, SRS, TFI and _thePSU Truancy Council. I will miss the glow you get, the sense of satisfaction you get at putting a family backtogether."
He also asked if there were any foster parents present at the reception.
"1want to single out my heroes, Noland said. "Foster parents are the bedrock of the child care program in Kansas."
He also decided to step up on his soap box one more time to speak on an issue that troubles him deeply. Noland said that an independent judicial system is
crudalto a functioning democracy.
W
"We must strive against attempts to compromise judicial independence and attempts to introduce politics into the selection process," Noland said. "I don't
mean this to be a downer, but it is so important. We will all pay for it, lf notm our lifetime, in ourchiJdren'slifetime."
Commission
July 25, 2015
on Judicial Qualifications

301 SW 10th Avenue, Room 374
THIS COMPLAINT IS AGAINST 11TH DISTRICT JUDGE LORI BOLTON FLEMING FOR USURPATION
OF OFFICE UNDER K.S.A. 60-1201, K.S.A. 60-1202(1)(2){4)(5),
1206(a}(b),
K.5.A. 60-1205, K.5.A. 60-
of RULES RELATING TO JUDICIAL CONDUCT CODE
OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT Rule 601A.
Why is this judge calling peaceful people terrorists, and other anti-government, or unpatriotic
names? On the Contrary
my ex-husband
and father of my children
"Eric Muathe"
is a very
peaceful person and it bothers us, as a family, that someone would actually attempt
to falsely
associate him with a militia group!!!

Is this what actually goes on between judges and lawyers? How can anyone respect such a
dysfu nctional judiciary???
Are judges allowed to retaliate
unethical
all those involved and especially Judge Lori B. Fleming for this unbelievable
email.
Sincerely,
McCann
411 West 7th Street

Pittsburg,
for their
actions?
Please reprimand
Michelle
just because the people are holding them accountable
Kansas, 66762
DATE OF COMPLAINTI~ JUNE 24, 2015

301 SW 10th AVE.
Topeka, Ks 66612
Case Number 13DM245P
THIS COMPLAINTIS AGAINST11THDISTRICT JUDGESLORI BOLTON FLEMING. AJ. WACHTER,
AND KURTIS LOYFOR USURPATIONOF OFFICEUNDER K.S.A.60-1201, K.S.A.60-1202(1)(2)(4)(5),
K.S.A.60-1205, K.S.A.60-1206(a)(b), K.S.A.60-1207 and for violations of RULESRELATINGTO
JUDICIALCONDUCTCODEOF JUDICIALCONDUCTRule 601A, and Rule 5.4 of the Uniform Bonding
Code for outright termination of their INSURANCEBOND.
On February 19th, 2015 at approximately 7:55 a.m, I heard an ad on the radio on 100.7 ESPN where
a grand jury petition was going around to impeach all 11 thjudicial district judges due to conflicts of
interest between them. I heard the radio ad and didn't have a pen with me to write down who to
contact to sign the petition. It wasn't until the month of June 2015 that I heard about
"CONFLICTGATE.COM"and went to read up about area conflicts of interest with 11th Judicial district
judges and attorneys.
I saw there was an "e-mail" from Lori Fleming to 100.7 ESPN at February 19, 2015 at 1:43 P.M. after
just 2 days of running on the air and Judge Lori Fleming took it upon herself to use her power
inappropriately as a judge and to usurp/intrude into a private business contract between Summary
Judgment Group and My Town Media. I was wanting to sign the "Grand Jury Petition" but never ran
into anyone who was getting signatures for the petition because the radio aQ.qnly~ for 2 days
instead of 30 like 1was informed by The Summary Judgment Group which was the original contract
that was breached by Lori Fleming and attorney Bill Wachter of "Wilbert and Towner" who is the
President of "My Town Media". Judge Kurt Loy is mentioned in this ernail as well and needs to be
questioned for his involvement of the breach of contract as well.
What really disturbs me is the fact that I was cheated in case number "13DMZ4SP"..:because of
"CONFLICTSOF INTERST UNDER RULE 2.11 (A)(1) (2) (b) (c) (3)(5) (a) and Rule 2.4(B) due to the fact
that attorney Lori Fleming of Wilbert and Towner in 20l2,became an 11th district court judge in
the summer of 2012 and signed orders in case number 13DM245P where the attorneys are Steve
Stockard of Wilbert and Towner and her husband attorney Kyle Fleming of The Fleming Law Firm
at 100 S. Broadway where Lori Fleming advertises her attorney address-ia.Names-and Numbers in
2013 and 2014 phone book"!! How can both judge Lori Bolton-Fleming and A.J.Wachter sign a
"TEMPORARYORDER"on September 26. 2013 at 2:40 P.M. after the petition was filed in the case
and the attorney who filed the petition against me was none other than judge Lori-Bolten Fleming's
husband "ATTORNEYKYLEM. FLEMINGOF THE FLEMINGLAW FIRM"!!! Lori FI~ing definitely
had an economic interest in the proceeding because her husband Kyle Fleming was the plaintiffs
attorney. I mean if her husband doesn't get paid they might not have money to pay their mortgage
payment that month. This is also a violation of Rule 2.9 Ex Parte because there is no wayan order
can be signed 3 minutes later except for "EX-PARTE"which neither judge Lori Fle~g
nor Judge
A.J.Wachter had subject-matter jurisdiction to sign against me since Wilbert and T01.f1lerand The
Fleming Law Firm were the attorneys in the case which is a conflict of interest How did they sign
the order in this case so fast? Was it sent ex-parte like Lori Fleming sent to 100.7 ESPN on February
19,2015 at 1:43 P.M.? Or did Lori Fleming sign the "MANDATORYORDER FOR PARENTINGIN
DIVORCECLASSATTENDANCE"over lunch with her husband, the plaintiff's attorney in this case
Kyle Fleming? Perhaps she signed the "ORDER"at home during dinner or maybe outside in her
backyard with her husband while their children played outside. Did attorney Kyle Fleming and
Judge Lori Fleming go home and discuss this case ex-parte over dinner at home? How can she sign
an order in a case where my attorney Steve Stockard worked with her less than a year ago at
Wilbert and Towner? I had an order from protection of abuse issued against me and signed by
judge A.J.Wachter on December 2,2013 and his brother Bill Wachter owns Wilbert and Towner
how is that not a conflict of interest?
i
Another order was prepared by attorney Kyle Fleming and the "ORIGINALSIGNEDBYAJ.
WACHTER"!! How can this be when both A.J.Wachter and Kyle Fleming's father Robert Fleming
previously owned 'Wilbert, Towner. Lassman. Toburen, Fleming, and Wachter"? Isn't this a conflict
of interest under Rule 2.11( A)???? Kyle Fleming went on to be employed at Wilbert ,nd Towner
himself and then became a partner lowner of the firm himself. In the 2012 Names-a..rd Numbers
phone book Lori Fleming is employed at "Wilbert and Towner" along with the attorney who was
suppose to represent me in the case "STEVE STOCKARD"who worked with Lori Fleming previously
when he was a prosecuting attorney with Lori Bolton-Fleming for Crawford County in 2002. Lori
Fleming and Steve Stockard are also members of team Jesus at the catholic church intown. This
violates Rule 2.11(A) of Rules Relating To Judicial conduct by judge Fleming and judge Wachter and
numerous KRPC Rules by attorney Steve Stockard and attorney Kyle Fleming under KRPc Rule 1.7
conflicts of interest I feel their have been several violation of the code of judicial conduct and they
are the following: Rule 1.1, Rule 1.2, Rule 1.3, Rule 2.2, Rule 2.3, Rule 2.4(B), Rule 2.6(8), Rule 2.7,
Rule 2.9, Rule 2.11, and Rule 2.12(1)(2) for Chief ludge A.J.Wachter for violations o(his Supervisory
Duties. Lori Fleming and A.J.Wachter also failed to turn the other judge in for misconduct since
both judges knew they should not be signing any orders where the attorney's in the-ease is "Kyle
Fleming" or Steve Stockard which also violates Rule 2.15(A)(B).
I have been damaged "SEVERELY"in this case because of the lack of due process under the 5th
amendment that I have received from Crawford County District Court and both attorpeys in the
case Steve Sockard and Kyle Fleming. I would like an investigation into this matter because I paid
Steve Stockard $3.000 and did not realize he previously worked with the plaintiff'S attorney's wife
Judge Lori Fleming and that plaintiffs attorney Kyle Fleming used to own Wilbert and Towner and
Judge Lori Fleming and Judge AJ.Wachter have ties there as well since Bill Wachter still owns the
firm and it seems according to the email from the 11th district computer at 1:43 P.M..pn February
19,2015 from Lori Fleming to the owner of ESPN 100.7 which is "attorney Bill Wachter".
I would like to see what attorney BiII Wachter stated back in his response to the emaiJ at 01:43 P.M.
on February 19. 2015 from Lori Fleming when she wrote to him and breached the radio contract
and I think attorney Bill Wachter's computer needs to be checked to see what his re~ponse was to
Lori Fleming and possibly his brother Chief 11th Judge A.J.Wachter.
'
I am looking into suing "STEVE STOCKARDAND WILBERT AND TOWNER" in Small Claims Court
where] can sue for under $4,000 for the violation of KRPC Rule 1.7 that Steve Stockard and Kyle
Fleming collaborated against me. I had ineffective assistance of counsel and paid $3,000 for it and I
had supervised visits with my children and a protection ordered against me by judges "WHO DID
NOT HAVE SUBJECT-MATTERJURISDICTION" to sign any "ORDER" against me under 11th district
rule no. 2 Assignment of Cases(1)(5)(6)(a) (b) (c) (d) and I am looking into filing "MOTIONSTO
VACATETHE ORDERS" for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction in this case.
I will be signing a class-action lawsuit now against Lori Fleming in her private capa~ty since she
was not performing her public ministerial duties or job descriptions by interfering i~ a radio ad and
damaging myself the opportunity to sign a grand jury petition and she also-damaged'the summary
judgment group because they did not get the required voters due to her interference in a private
business matter and constitutional grand jury petition which violates Article 1 Section 10 of
unlimited right to contracting under the United State Constitution.
Please investigate this matter so no-one else has to endure the family damages I did ~ec<luse a
husband is the attorney in the case and his wife/and ex-law partner of "WILBERTAND TOWNER"
and ex-college roommate of his father Robert Fleming "A.J.Wachter" signed an "ORDER" against me
where my attorney was Steve Stockard and that is a conflict of interest. It is also a conflict of
interest for Judge Loy to hear this case since plaintiffs attorney Kyle Fleming's f~er-in-law
Mark
Bolton rents his CPA firm from Kurt Loy on 4th street and that is an economic conflict of interest as
well and Judge Loy should be disqualified from this case as well and a new judge'from out of the
11 th district be assigned to this case so I can receive some due process.
1
Very truly yours,

Zachary Walden
'l~
2800 N. Michigan
Pittsburg, Ks 66762
CCAttorney General's Office and State Insurance Commissioner
Date: "'7/10/2015
. Time: 12:58 PM
Page 3 of 3
User: PAH
Crawford County District Court (Pittsburg)

ROAReport
Case: 2014-CR-000332-P
Current Judge: Kurtis I Loy
Defendant: Simmons, Charles Edward

State of Kansas vs. Charles Edward Simmons
Felony
Judge
Date
7/6/2015
Motion for Return of Seized Property

Document ID Number: 285020
Kurtis I Loy
Date:
,Time:
~t
7/1012015
V~vl.
ROAReDOPr----~_~
12:31 PM
~ ,.~
Case: 2014-CR-000088-P
Page 1 of 2
Current Judge: Kurtis I Lay
Defendant: Hall, Andrew

State of Kansas vs. Andrew Hall
Misdemeanor
Judge
Date
4/16/2014
Kurtis I Lay
Information
Document 10 Number: 236487
Affidavit
Hearing Scheduled (First Appearance
Kurtis I Loy
Document sealed
07/10/201409:00
AM)
Kurtis I Lay
Summons Issued to Crawford Co.So. for servcie
Kurtis I Loy
5/1612014
Summons ReturnedlNo Service, certified mail unclaimed 5/15/14

Kurtis I Loy
7/15/2014
Warrant Issued
Kurtis I Loy
Document sealed
7130/2014
Bond Received by fax

Kurtis I Loy
Arrest Warrant ServedlReturned Defendant: Hall, Andrew

Kurtis I Lay
Kurtis I Loy
09:00 AM)
09/04/2014
7/31/2014
Bond Received
Kurtis I Lay
9/4/2014
Notice Of Hearing
Kurtis I Lay
9/5/2014
Hearing Rescheduled (Court Trial 10/16/201401
10/11/2014
Notice Of Hearing
Kurtis I Lay
10/1512014
Entry of Appearance by Andrew Bolton

Kurtis I Loy
Motion For Continuance

Kurtis 1 Lay
:00 PM)
Kurtis I Loy
10/17/2014
Hearing Rescheduled (Status Conference
10/23/2014
Order granting motion to continue

Kurtis I Lay
11/4/2014
Motion Requesting Discovery

Kurtis I Loy
11/1312014
Notice Of Hearing 12 -11-14 at 2:00 pm

Kurtis I Loy
11/14/2014
Hearing Rescheduled (Court Trial 12/11/201402:00
11/19/2014
Order For Discovery

Kurtis I Lay
12/11/2014
Motion For Continuance

Kurtis I Loy
12/16/2014
Order granting motion to continue

Kurtis 1 Lay
11/13/2014
Hearing Rescheduled (Court Trial 01/08/201501

1/8/2015
Amended Information
01 :00 PM)
PM)
:00 PM)
Kurtis I Loy
Kurtis I Lay
Kurtis I Loy
Kurtis I Ley
Dare: 7/10/2015
. Time:
User: POLLY
12:31 PM
ROAReport
Page'2 of 2
Case: 2014-CR-000088-P
Current Judge: Kurtis
Loy
Defendant: Hall, Andrew

State of Kansas
VS.
Andrew Hall
Misdemeanor
Judge
Date
1/8/2015
Journal Entry of Sentencing

Kurtis I Lay
Plea Entered - NC (21.5709.b.2 Use/possess w/intent to use drug

paraphernalia into human body)
Kurtis I Ley
Guilty Plea (21.S709.b.2 Use/possess wlintent to use drug paraphernalia

into human body)
Kurtis I Ley
1/9/2015
Charge Amended to (21.5709.b.2 Use/possess w/intent to use drug

paraphernalia into human body)
Kurtis I Loy
1/13/2015
Conditions Of Probation
Kurtis I Lay
7Je/2015
Motion / Journal Entry To Extend Probation

Kurtis I Lay
Date:
7/10/2015
Crawford
Time:
12:29 PM
Count
. tric Court (Pittsburg)
User: POLLY
-;;-;Re~is +0 F~-A-.t'r
ROAReport
Case: 2012-PR-000101-P
Page 1 of 1
Current Judge: Kurtis I Loy

In the Matter of the Estate of Alexander KonopeeTKiJ----
/'
{f\ti/'.
bc 11-6Jf\
~
Decedent Estate
Judge
Date
12/18/2012
12/21/2012
2/12/2013
Petition Filed
John C Gariglietti
Oath of Special Administrator

John C Gariglietti
Order appointing special administrator

John C Gariglietti
Letters of special adrnfnlstratlon

John C Gariglietti
3 Statement of creditors claims from AscensionPoint for: Walmart Credit

Care $268.06, GE Capital $789.23, Sam's Club $2016.08
John C Gariglietti
Dare:
7/10/2015
.: Tirrre: 12:30 PM
ROAReport
Page 1 of2
Case: 2014-CR000132-P
Curre
User: POLLY
~
Judge: A J Wachter
Defendant: Stewart, Kimberly N

State of Kansas vs. Kimberly N Stewart
Felony
Date
5/28/2014
Judge
Information
AJWachter
Summons Issued to Cr Co So for srvc by cert mail
A J Wachter

6/12/2014
06/18/201409:00
AM)
Summons Returned/No Service, certified mail returned not deliverable
AJ Wachter
A J Wachter
6/6/14

6/25/2014
Arrest Warrant Issued Bond amount: 5000.00 cash surety / Defendant:

Stewart, Kimberly N
A J Wachter
7/16/2014
Amended information
A J Wachter
7/18/2014
Amended warrant issued
A J Wachter
7/24/2014
Original warrant returned
11/12/2014
Document sealed
Arrest Warrant Quashed Defendant: Stewart, Kimberly N
Document sealed
A J Wachter
Arrest Warrant Issued Bond amount: 1575.86

Kimberly N Cash only bail
11/13/2014
Defendant: Stewart,
A J Wachter
A J Wachter
Arrest Warrant ServedlReturned Defendant Stewart, Kimberly N Cash

only bail
A J Wachter
First Appearance Journal Entry - Status December 17, 2014 At 9:00 am

Kurtis I Lay
Application For Appointed Defense Services --Approved

Kurtis 1 Loy
Order Appointing Counsel - Andy Bolton

Kurtis l Loy
Notice Of Hearing And Appointment Of Attorney

.
A J Wachter
Commitment: $1,575.86 Cash Only Bond. Status Conference December

17,2014 At 9:00 am
Kurtis I Loy
Hearing Scheduled (Status Conference
A J Wachter
12/17/201409:00
AM)
Amended Warrant Returned, Picked Up 11/112014 By Vernon Co Mo.

11/10/2014 Brought CR SO By Corrections
A J Wachter
Packet To Bolton
A J Wachter
Cash Bond Posted (Receipt 363629 Dated 11-/26/2014 for 1575.86). To

Appear December 17,2014 At 9:00 am
Oocument ID Number: 259712
A J Wachter
Order Releasing Bond Money

A J Wachter
12/17/2014
Notice Of Hearing for Plea

A J Wachter
12/18/2014
Hearing Scheduled (Plea 02/04/2015
11/26/2014
10:30 AM)
A J Wachter
Date:
. Tima:
7110/2015
12:30 PM
ROA Report
Case: 2014-CR-000132-P
Page 2 of2
User: POLLY
Current Judge: AJ Wachter
Defendant: Stewart, Kimberly N

State of Kansas
vs. Kimberly N Stewart
Felony
Date
Judge
1/8/2015
Motion Requesting Discovery

A J Wachter
1/26/2015
Order for discovery

A J Wachter
21412015
Plea Entered - NC (21.5821.b.2.B Giving a worthless check 7 day total

$1000 to $25,000)
A J Wachter
Dismissal (CR and JV) (21.5821.b.2.B Giving a worthless check; 7 day total A J Wachter
$1000 to $25,000)
Petition To Enter Plea
A J Wachter
ORder for presentence investigation report

A J Wachter
Notice Of Hearing
A J Wachter
Preliminary Hearing Waived

A J Wachter
Notice of Supreme Court Rule #354 of waiver of prelim (janet Vanleeuwen)

A J Wachter
2/9/2015
Hearing Rescheduled
A J Wachter
3/5/2015
Presentence Investigation report

(Sentencing 03/18/2015
10:30 AM)
A J Wachter
Victim Impact Statement
A J Wachter
Document sealed
04:00 PM)
3/20/2015
Hearing Rescheduled
4/812015
Assignment Order
A J Wachter
4/10/2015
Bond Converted to Fines, Penalties and Forfeitures (Receipt number

365452 dated 4/10/2015 amount 1,575.86)
A J Wachter
Notice of Supreme Court Rule #354 of sentencing (Shaun Higgins)

A J Wachter
4120/2015
Conditions Of Probation
A J Wachter
4/28/2015
Journal Entry of sentencing

AJ Wachter
4/30/2015
Email Sent Date: 04/30/2015 11:28 am To: Chris

(chrisc@sentencing.ks.gov) File Attached:
PRESENTENCEINVESTIGATIONREPORT.pdf
Name of Document:
Presentence Investigation Report
A J Wachter
Email Sent Date: 04/30/201511:28

am To: Chris
File Attached:
JOURNALENTRYOFSENTENCING.pdf
Name of Document journal entry
of sentencing
A J Wachter
(Sentencing 04/08/2015
(chrisc@sentencing.ks.gov)
A J Wachter
G}te:
"Time:
User: PAH
Crawford County District Court.{Pittsburg)
7/10/2015
ROA Report
12:59 PM
Page 1 of 1
Cas'
014-DM-000278-P
Current Judge: A J Wachter

Oliver Turner, et ai, Petitioner vs. Carlin E Turner, Respon
Marriage Dissolution/Divorce
Judge
Date
Petition Filed
A J Wachter
Domestic Relations Affidavit

A J Wachter
Child Support Worksheet

A J Wachter
Proposed Parenting Plan

A J Wachter
Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Enforcement Act

A J Wachter
Parenting Class Order

A J Wachter
Motion For Ex-Parte Temporary Orders

A J Wachter
Ex-Parte Orders
A J Wachter
8/8/2014
Summons Issued Back to Attny for Service

A J Wachter
8/11/2014
Summons Returned, Personal Service 8-10-14

A J Wachter
8/12/2014
Email Sent Date: 08/12/2014 10:51 am To:

kfleming@fleming-Iawfirm.com File Attached:
SUMMONSRETURNED,PERSONALSERVICE.pdf
Summons Returned, Personal Service
A J Wachter
8/7/2014
Name of Document:
8/26/2014
Answer of responsent
AJ Wachter
9/16/2014
Certificate of Attendance for Emmaly Farr

AJ Wachter
10/712014
Hearing Rescheduled (Check Status
12/2/2014
Hearing Rescheduled (Notice of Intent to Dismiss 12/30/201409:00
12/5/2014
Hearing Rescheduled
AM)
11/07/201405:00
PM)
AJ Wachter
AM)
(Case Management Conference 01126/201510:30
A J Wachter
A J Wachter
Notice of Case Management Conference

A J Wachter
11712015
Motion to dismiss
A J Wachter
119/2015
Order to dismiss
A J Wachter
Dcfte:
711012015
Time: 01:00 PM
Page 1 of 1
User: PAH
ROAReport
Case: 2014-CV-000070-P
Lacie Reed vs. Assurant, Inc
Other
Judge
Date
7/2/2014
Request and Service Instruction Form

A J Wachter
Subpoena To Appear At Videotaped Deposition Issued to Process Server

A J Wachter
Date:
. Time;
7/10/2015
01:02
PM
ROA Report
Case: 2014-DM-000404-P
Page 1 of 2
User: PAH
Ktle. (.(e-N\ CI\, ~.rl\~

David
Barnes.Respondent
Tara Barnes, Petitioner vs.
~ ~e ~
A:J. wtlvh1er
Dwne.~ w,lloerfi Tot,.) I\f'Y

Marriage DissolutionlDivorce
Date
Judge
Petition Filed
A J Wachter

A J Wachter
Motion For Issuance of Temporary Orders

A JWachter
Temporary Orders
A J Wachter
Temporary Parenting Plan

A J Wachter
Parenting Class Order

A J Wachter
Summons Issued Back to Attny for Service

A J Wachter
11/25/2014
Summons Returned, Personal Service 11-24-14

A J Wachter
12/12/2014
Answer of respondent
A J Wachter
12/18/2014

A J Wachter
12/29/2014
Certificate of Attendance for David Barnes

A J Wachter
Certificate of Attendance for Tara Barres

A J Wachter
Permanent Parenting Plan

A J Wachter
Property Settlement Agreement

A J Wachter
2/11/2015
Divorce Decree
A J Wachter
3/30/2015
Income Withholding Order $2,655 per month

A J Wachter
4/1/2015
Amended Income Withholding Order $2645 per month

A J Wachter
11/18/2014
219/2015
4/8/2015
)(
Email Sent Date: 04/08/201509:57

am To: mary@spigarelli-Iaw.com
Attached: AMENDEDINCOMEWITHHOLDINGORDERpdf
Name of
Document: Amended Income Withholding Order
.;t' Email Sent
File A J Wachter
Date: 04/08/2015 09:58 am To: mary@spirgarelli-Iaw.com

Attached: INCOMEWITHHOLDINGORDERpdf
Name of Document:
Income Withholding Order
File A J Wachter
Email Sent Date: 04/08/2015 11:36 am To: mary@spigarelli-law.com

Attached: INCOMEWITHHOLDINGORDER.pdf
Name of Document:
Income Withholding Order
File A J Wachter
Date:
7/10/2015
r>
User: PAH
-Time: "01 :02 PM
ROAReport
Case: 2014-DM-000404-P
Page 2 of2

Tara Barnes, Petitioner vs. David Barnes, Respondent
Marriage Dissolution/Divorce
Date
Judge
4/8/2015
Email Sent Date: 04/08/2015 11:37 am To: mary@spigarelli-Iaw.com File A J Wachter

Attached: AMENDEDINCOMEWITHHOLDINGORDER.pdf
Name of
Document: Amended Income Withholding Order
4/10/2015
Vital stat sht mailed to Topeka
A J Wachter
6/212015
Income Withholding Order $1538 per month child support & $1112 per
month maint.
A J Wachter
...,

301 SW 10th
Topeka Ks 66612
THIS COMPLAINT IS AGAINST 11TH DISTRICT JUDGE LORI BOLTON FLEMING

I recently signed a grand jury petition that was going around to impeach all 11III judicial district judges due
to try to get the signatures a radio ad was ran on 100] ESPN My Town Media which is owned by attorney
Bill Wachter who is Chief Judge A.J. Wachter;s brother. There seems to be an e-mail that came from
Judge Lori Fleming's public computer that seems to be inappropriate conduct Please in'festigate this
matter.
perfonning her public ministerial duties or job descriptions by interfering in a radio ad and damaging the
Very truly yours,

Fred Grablas
P.O. Box 47
Opolis, Ks 66760
~tate of lRansas
KANSAS JlJDICIAL CENTER
301 SWTENTH AVE., ROOM 374

785-296-2913
judicialqual@l.scourts.org
CHAIR:
Mary Thrower
Judge Member
VICE-CHAIR:
Nicholas St. Peter
Judge Member
June 19,2015
Nancy S. Ansl-aetl
Lawyer Member
). Patricl. Brazil
Judge Member
Lester Moore
508 E. Viener, Lot Al
Frontenac, Kansas 66763
Brenda Call1eron
Judge Member
Re:
Dr. Mary Davidson

Non-Lawyer Member
Dear Mr. Moore:
Allen G. Glendenning
Lawyer Member
Larry D. HendricI.s
Judge Member
This office is in receipt of your above-referenced complaint.

The above-captioned complaint will be referred to the Commission and will
be placed on the Commission's August 7, 2015, meeting agenda.
David J. King
Judge Member
Sincerely,
/h~/alf
Susan Lynn
Non-La.wyer M.ember
Heather L. Smith,
Secretary
Christina Pannbacl.er
Non-Lawyer Member
Wi!liaxn H. Swearer
Lawyer Member
Valdenia C. Winn
Non-Lawyerfl.1em ber
Diane S . Worth
Lawyer MeIIl],ec
SECRETARY:
Heather 1. Smith
Your complaint against District Judge Lori A. Bolton Fleming
mm
":)(.,> /l ~ ;2?-,?-
IS

Memorial Hall
Topeka, Ks 66612
USURPATION OF OFFICE UNDER K.5.A. 60-1201. K.S.A. 60-1202(1)(2)(4)(5). K.5.A. 601205, K.S.A. 60-1206 (a) (b), K.S.A. 60-1207 and for violations
JUDICIAL CONDUCT
Rule 601A.
I recently heard a grand jury petition that was going around to oust all 11th judicial district N(iges due to
into a private business contract between Summary Judgment Group and My Town Media. twas wanting to
performing her public ministerial duties or job descriptions
by interfering in a radio ad and :d~maging myself
jury petition.
Very truly yours,
GV5 P'(y oy
#;:JY
ljt"'.-,iu"tc;,d<
f? HShu(Cj!<'S
~
!\
v-
(!i?~
lotoilo)
CC Kansas Commission on Judicial Qualifications and State Insurance Commissioner'

Topeka Ks 66612
USURPATION OF OFFICE UNDER K.S.A. 60-1201. K.S.A. 60-1202(1)(2)(4)~5). K.S.A. 601205. K.S,A. 60-1206(a)(b),
JUDICIAL CONDUCT
of RUtES Rfl{\TING
TO
Rule 601A.
I recently signed a grand jury petition that was going around to oust all 11111 judicial district judges due to
conflicts of interest between them which was filed in case number 2015MR2P. During the-.,petitiondrive to
try to get the signatures a radio ad was ran on 100.7 ESPN My Town Media which is own~ by attorney Bill
Wachter. After just 2 days of running on the air Judge Lori Fleming took it upon herseltto use her power
Judgment Group and My Town Media. She wrote a private emait on her regular job time as a public
servant judge and she then had the nerve to profile the Summary Judgment Group ana ~ake slanderous,
demeaning nicknames by calling anyone who signed it including "myself' "posse cometa,ut" because of
that Lori Fleming made typos in her slanderous insulting remarks or the fact that she can't s,imply spell the
word "posse cornltatus' doesn't change the fact she insulted anyone who signed:the petition and labeled us
in a political box now! Who is Kurt in the email? Is it Judge Kurt Loy was he in on this too?'? Ithink since
the copy of the message sent to 100.7 ESPN was from the email address of <!fleming @11thjd.org> is from
the investigation and see how many other messages and emails were sent ex parte and ~ut private
matters as well. I have included a copy of the picture going around the 11th judicial district Which shows Lori
Fleming contacting 100.7 ESPN at 1:43 P.M. on February 19, 2015. Is this why1he state has to have
furloughs is because our public servants are conducting private business on taxpayers time. Iwill be
signing a class-action lawsuit now against Lori fleming in her private capacity since she was not
Very
u \.U,'/.....iI!-~r--....,--
/11M{
/t1cU"c
.A'"?I.~_~ ~
lJoher+y
j 60 ~
19:)6
--1+ o I~Ije
CC Kansas Commission On Judicial Qualification$ and State Insurance Commissioner
p~-4sIoJ,Kc ~(,,7(/)

Topeka Ks 66612
THIS COMPLAINT IS AGAINST llTI-i DISTRICT JUDGE LORI BOLTON FLEMING FOR
USURPATION OF OFFICE UNDER K.S.A. 60-1201, K.S.A. 60-1202(1)(2){4}(5), K.S.A. 60-
1205. K.S.A. 60-1206(a)(b). K.S.A. 60-1207 and for violations of RULESRE.J.t.TING TO

JUDICIAL CONDUCT
Rule 601A.
. I recently signed a grand jury petition that was going around to oust all 11th judicial district judges due to
conflicts of int~rest between t~em which was filed in case num~e~~O~ 5~~2~. ?ur~~~ thEjetition d~i~e to.
try to get the signatures a radio ad was ran on 100.7 ESPN My Town Media whlcnls owne~1>Yattorney Bill
Wachter. After just 2 days of running on the air Judge Lori Fleming took it upon nerseff to use her power
Judgment Group and My Town Media. She wrote a private email on her regular job time as a public
servant judge and she then had the nerve to profile the Summary Judgment Group anctQakeslanderous,
demeaning nicknames by calling anyone who signed it including "myself "posse contetiut" because of
word 'posse comitatus" doesn't change the fact she insulted anyone who signed the petition and labeled us
in a political box now! Who is Kurt in the email? Is it Judge Kurt Loy was he in on this too?? I think since
the copy of the message sent to 100.7 ESPN was from the emait address of <Ifleming @11thjd.org> is from
matters as well. Ihave included a copy of the picture going around the 11th judicial district ,hich shows Lori
Fleming contacting 100.7 ESPN at 1:43 P.M. on February 19, 2015Aslliis why the-state has to have
furloughs is because our public servants are conducting private business on taxpayers time. I will be
signing a class-action lawsuit now against Lori Fleming in her private capacity since she was not
Very truly;:gu
/~~
.P/~~
N
I-
/~/[../
r,
0y P/,,)lltP5
R.ob
5)0 . 5& u~
"')-fr~e..+
Wm~ I(~ b67/~
"
301 SW. Tenth Avenue
Topeka Ks 66612
THIS COMPLAINT IS AGAINST 11TH DtSTRICT JUDGE LORI BOLTON FLEMING FOR
USURPATION
OF OFFICE UNDER K.S.A. 60-1201. K.S.A. 60-1202(1){2)(4)(5).
1205, K.S.A. 60-1206(a)(b),

JUDICIAL CONDUCT
Uniform
K.S.A. 60-
of RULES RRATING
TO
Rule 601A and Rule 5.4 of The
Bonding Code.
I recently signed a grand jury petition that was going around to oust all 11th judiciat district j4dges due to
conflicts of interest between them which was filed in case number 2015MR2P. During the petition drive to
try to get the signatures a radio ad was ran on 100] ESPN My Town Media which is owned by attorney Bill
Wachter. After just 2 days of running on the air Judge Lori Fleming took it upon herself to use her power
inappropriately as a judge and to usurp/intrude into a private business contract between ~ummary
Judgment Group and My Town Media. She wrote a private em ail at her regular job as a flublic servant
judge and she then had the nerve to profile the Summary Judgment Group and make slanderous,
demeaning nicknames by calling anyone who signed it including "myselF "posse cometaut" because of
What Lori Heming called anyone that signed the grand jury petition is really "posse comitatus", The
definition of "posse comitatus" is the named taken by a right wing, anti-tax extremist group
founded in 1969 by Henry L. Beach a retired dry cleaner and one time member of the silver
shirt, nazi inspired organization that was established in the United States after Adolph Hitler
came to power in Germany. The group operated on the belief that the true in\ent of the
founders of The United States was to establish a Christian Republic where the ~dividual was
sovereign".
The last thing I would ever be associated with is a "WHITE NAZI HATE GROUP WHEN I PLAYED HIGH
SCHOOL AND COLLEGE FOOTBALL WITH ALL MINORITIES AND MY GIRLFRIEND',~ CHILDREN
ARE BIRACIAL". I find that highly derogatory and a very racist comment. I think sinceth copy of the
message sent to 100.7 ESPN was from the em ail address of <Ifleming @11thjd.org> is from a public
judicial courthouse email address that the computer this was sent from needs to be taken during the
investigation and see how many other messages and emsis were sent ex parte and about private maners
as well. I have included a copy of the picture going around the 11th judicial district which shows Lori
Fleming contacting 100.7 ESPN at 1:43 P.M. on February 19, 2015.
I will be signing a class-action lawsuit now against Lori Fleming in her private capacity for qeprivation of
federally protected rights42-USC 1983 since she was not performing her public ministerial puties or job
descriptions by interfering in a radio advertisement and stopping the summary judgment group from getting
the required voters due to her interference in a private business matter and constitutional grand jury petition
which violates Article 1 Section 10 of The United States Constitution.

Very truly yours,
Matt Schwob ,
16 0 I ~' E I ff/
P ;+t s b u'("3
i( '5 ~ ~
CC Attorney General's Office and State Insurance Commissioner
7~~
-:5v t1~ ;t?-,?-
IS

Memorial Hall
Topeka, Ks 66612
THIS COMPLAINT IS AGAINST 11THDISTRICT JUDGE LORI BOLTON FLEMING FOR
USURPATION OF OFFICE UNDER K.S.A. 60-1201. K.5.A. 60-1202(1)(2)(4)(5).
K.5.A. 601205, K.S.A. 60-1206(a)(b),
JUDICIAL CONDUCT
Rule 601A.
I recently heard a grand jury petition that was going around to oust all 11th judicial district NQges due to
into a private business contract between Summary Judgment Group and My Town Media. twas wanting to
because the radio ad was only ran for 2 days instead of 30 like J was informed by The Summary Judgment
performing her public ministerial duties or job descriptions by interfering in a radio ad and .dmaging myself
the opportunity to sign a grand jury petition and she also damaged the summary judgmentgroup and they
Jury petition.
Very truly' yours,
Gl{eS py-y
0,'
#]'1 y-i-V,,,k'ctc;,de
p; H')h
<j/l5
LJr
i..olD(b;l
~
c-
tf?~

Topeka Ks 66612
USURPATION OF OFFICE UNDER K.S.A. 60-1201, K.S.A. 60-1202(1)(2)(4){5).
K.s.A. 60-
1205, K5.A. 60-1206(a)(b). K.S.A. 60-1207 and for violations of RUlfS Rf1f.TING TO
JUDICIAL CONDUCT
CODe OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT
Rule 601A.
I recently signed a grand jury petition that was going around to oust all 11th iudicial district judges due to
conflicts of interest between them which was filed in case number 2015MR2P. During th9\~etition drive to
try to get the signatures a radio ad was ran on 100.7 ESPN My Town Media which is own~ by attorney Bill
Wachter. After just 2 days of running on the air Judge Lori Fleming took it upon hersellto use her power
inappropriately as a judge and to usurpllntrude into a private business contract between Summary
servant judge and she then had the nerve to profile the Summary Judgment Group ancf,,!ake slanderous,
demeaning nicknames by calling anyone who signed it including "myself' "posseco~ut"
because of
word "posse comitatus" doesn't change the fact she insulted anyone who signed lhe petiliOfl and labeled us
in a political box now! Who is Kurt in the emaH? Is it Judge Kurt L-oywas he in OR this too?? f think since
the copy of the message sent to 100.7 ESPN was from the em ail address of <!fleming @11thjd.org> is from
matters as well. I have included a copy of the picture going around the 11th judicial district Which shows Lori
Fleming contacting 100.7 ESPN at 1:43 P.M. on February 19,2015. Is this whyihe state has to have
summary judgment group and not getting the required voters due to her interference in aJ>rivate business
Very truJuou~~
111/;()/;(~
j1;1aY'c
..
Uoher-fy J 66 ~ YQ 7iH.l+h o t,
\Ie
. ~. . ('\
p:+lslovr, K" bL7')"

Topeka Ks 66612
THIS COMPLAINT IS AGAlNST 1FH DISTRICT JUDGE LORI BOLTON FLEMING FOR
USURPATION OF OFFICE UNDER K.S.A. 60~120l. K.S.A. 60-1202(1)(2)(4)(5),
K.S.A. 601205. K.S.A. 60-1206(a)(b),
JUD1ClAL CONDUCT
of RULES ~TING
TO
Rule 601A.
conflicts of int~rest between t~em which was filed in case nurnbe~_~O~
5M~2~. _~~~~~ th~~etition d~veto.
try to get the signatures a radio ad was ran on 100.7 ESPN MfTown Machawtucn ISownel1"bV attOrney BIll
Wachter. After just 2 days of running on the air Judge Lori Fleming took it uponherseffto use her power
servant judge and she then had the nerve to profile the Summary Judgment Group and~ake slanderous,
demeaning nicknames by calling anyone who signed it including "myself "possecomet~ut'J because of
word "posse comitatus" doesn't change the fact she insulted anyone who signed the petition and labeled us
the copy of the message sent to 100.7 ESPN was from the emaH address of <lfleming @11thjd.org> is from
the investigation and see how many other messages and emails were sent ex parte and a;out private
matters as well. I have included a copy of the picture going around the 11th judicial district ,hich shows Lori
Fleming contacting 100] ESPN at 1:43 P.M. on February 19, 2015As-tms-why me state nas to have
periorming her public ministerial duties or job descriptions by interiering in a radio ad a~ damaging the
summary judgment group and not getting the required voters due to her interference inaprivate business
VerytrUIY~
///~'J
. ~~
r> ,
/~//C/
r:
'
f'.
Robloy. p(:ltI'5
'5)0
e 5.:1 u~
I+t m'\
/(<{
"5-fr~e+
~~
71{).

301 SW. Tenth Avenue
Topeka Ks 66612
THIS COMPLAINT ISAGAINST 11TH DISTRICT JUDGE LORI BOLTON FLEMING FOR
USURPATION OF OFFICE UNDER K.S.A. 60-1201. K.S.A. 60-1202(1){2)(4}(5). K.5.A. 601205. K.S.A. 60-1206(a)(b).
JUDICIAL CONDUCT
Uniform
Rule 601A and Rule 5.4 of The
Bonding Code.
I recently signed a grand jury petition that was going around to oust all 11th judicia! districtj4dges due to
try to get the signatures a radio ad was ran on 100.7 ESPN My Town Media which is owned by attorney Bill
inappropriately as a judge and to usurp/intrude into a private business contract between~ummary
Judgment Group and My Town Media. She wrote a private email at her regular job as 8 Qublic servant
judge and she then had the nerve to profile the Summary Judgment Group and make slanderous,
demeaning nicknames by calling anyone who signed it including "myselF "posse cometaut" because of
What Lori Fteming called anyone that signed the grand jury petition is really "posse comitatus'. The
definition of "posse comitatus;' is the named taken by a right wing, anti-tax extremist group
founded in 1969 by Henry L. Beach a retired dry cleaner and one time member of the silver
shirt, nazi inspired organization that was established in the United States after Adolph Hitler
came to power in Germany. The group operated on the belief that the true in\ent of the
founders of The United States was to establish a Christian Republic wherethe [ndividual was
sovereign".
The last thing I would ever be associated with is a "WHITE NAZI HATE GROUP WHEN I PLAYED HIGH
SCHOOL AND COLLEGE FOOTBALL WITH ALL MINORITIES AND MY GIRLFRIENDr,~ CHILDREN
ARE SIRACIAL". I find that highly derogatory and a very racist comment. I think sincefhp copy of the
message sent to 100.7 ESPN was from the email address of <Ifleming @11thjd;org> is from a public
judicial courthouse email address that the computer this was sent from needs to be taken during the
investigation and see how many other messages and emails were sent ex parte and about private matters
as well. I have included a copy of the picture going around the 11th judicial district which shows Lori
Fleming contacting 100.7 ESPN at 1:43 P.M. on February 19, 2015.
I will be signing a class-action lawsuit now against Lori Fleming in her private capacity for qeprivation of
federally protected rights42-USC 1983 since she was not performing her public ministerial~uties or job
descriptions by interfering in a radio advertisement and stopping the summary judgment group from getting
the required voters due to her interference in a private business matter and constitutional grand jury petition
which violates Article 1 Section 10 of The United States Constitution.
Very truly yours,
Matt Schwob J
J 5 0 I ~, E I ffI I
p; +t s b u'Cj
i( sip ~ 710 ')
Kansas Commission on.Judicial Qualifications

301 S.w. Tenth Avenue
Topeka Ks 66612
Re: 2015CV04G
THIS COMPLAINT IS AGAINST nTH DISTRICT JUDGE AJ. Wachter FOR USURPATION
K.S.A. 60-1205, K.S.A.
60-1206(a)(b),
CONDUCT
Law, Rule 1.2 Promoting
of RULES RELATING TO JUDICIAL
Rule 601A. Rule 1.1 Compliance With The
Confidence in The Judiciary. Rule 1.3 Avoldlng Inappropriate
Use of the Prestige of Judicial Office Rule 2.2 Impartiality
and Fairness, ~ule 2.3 Bias,
Prejudice, and Harassment. Rule 2.4 External Influences on Judicial Conduct, Rule 2.7
Responsibility To Decide, Rule 2.11 Disqualification.
Rule 2.16 Cooperation
Rule 2.12 Supervisory Duties. and
with Disciplinary Authorities.
I recently signed a grand jury petition that was going around to oust all 11th judicial district j~dges due to
Wachter who is A.J. WaChter's brother. After just 2 days of running on the air Judge Lori Fleming took it
upon herself to use her power inappropriately as a judge and to usurp/intrude into a private business
contract between Summary Judgment Group and My Town Media. She wrote a privat~ email on her
regular job time as a public servant judge and she then had the nerve to profile the Summary Judgment
Group and make slanderous, demeaning nicknames by calling anyone who signed it including "myself'
"posse cometaut" because of my political views to simpty signa constitutional grand jury petition.
What Lori Fleming called anyone that signed the grand jury petition is really "posse comitatl;ls". The fact
word "posse comitatus" doesn't Change the fact she insulted anyone who signed the petition and labeled us
in a political box now! Who is Kurt in the email? Is it Judge Kurt Lay was he in on this too?? I think since
a public judicial courthouse email address that the computer this was sent from needs to ~ taken during
the investigation and see how many other messages and emaiJs were sent ex parte and abput private
matters as welJ. I have included a copy of the picture going around the 11th judicial district which shows Lori
Fleming contacting 100.7 ESPN at 1:43 P.M. on February 19,2015. Is this why the state has to have
furloughs is because our public servants are conducting private business on taxpayers time. The state
should now have a permanent furlough and decrease about 70% of these government jo~ since the public
servants don't want to perform their public job duties. I will be signing a class-action laWSUItnow against
Lori Fleming;n her private capacity since she was not performing her public ministerial duties or job
descriptions by interfering in a radio ad and damaging the summary judgment group and not getting the
required voters due to her interference in a private business matter and constitutional granc,liury petition.
She recused herself from case number 2015CV04G RE: Travis Carlton vs. Kansas Department of Revenue
on March 23, 2015 due to an ethic complaint that was filed against her by myself which the Kansas
Commission on Judicial Qualifications heard on February 14,2015. Lori Fleming had previously violated
Rule 2.16(8) on 2119. 2015 at 1:43 P.M. when she called me "Posse Cometauf and slandered me with a
demeaning nickname and showed bias and prejudice against anyone Pro Se or who si!fs a grand jury
petition,
A.J. Wachter has violated Rule 2.12 because he has allowed two of his 11th district judges Kurt Lay and
Lori Fleming to usurp and intrude into a constitutional grand jury by Lori Fleming sending a private email
from the 11th judicial office which violates Rule 1.3 Avoiding Inappropriate Use of the P(estige of Judicial
Office. He has also violated Rule 2.7 and Rule 2.11 (A) because he should have never had any subiectmatter jurisdiction to hear my hearing on June 8,2015 and I have now had a hearing for my OUI appeal
with a judge who had "NO SUBJECT -MA TIER JURISDICTION" to be there and should have previously
recused just like Lori Fleming did back on March 23,2015. That was almost 3 months ago that Chief
Judge A.J. Wachter had to find out why Lori Fleming recused from my case.
Please investigate and find out why Judge Wachter did not properly recuse from case number 2015CV04G
like Lori Fleming did. Please also find out why when Lori Fleming recuses she just writes to Chief Judge
A.J. Wachter and addresses him as "A.J.". I think I have the answer to that question since Lori Fleming can
personally send A,J. Wachter's brother, attorney Bill Wachter private emails during company time and tell
Bill who and who not can run an advertisement on Bill Wachter's private radio station. I have included the
motion for change of judge with affidavit for your committee to view to see if you think Judge Wachter
should privately cease and desist this case under Rule 2.11 (A).
Very truly yours,
Travis Carlton 1410 N. Smelter Pittsburg Ks 66762
!
/:;t:::...,/~
~.~-~-
CC Attomey General's Office

State Insurance Commissioner
,----
.. ,,~.".
...

Re: 15CV38P
Topeka Ks 66612
THIS COMPLAINT
FOR USURPATION
IS AGAINST 11TH DISTRICT JUDGES A.J. WACHTER AND KURT lOY

K.S.A. 60-1205, K.S.A. 60-1206(a)(b).
K.s.A. 60-1207 and for violations
of RULES
RELATING TO JUDICIAL CONDUCT
Rule 60lA. and
Rule 5.4 of The Uniform
Bonding Code.
I recently signed a grand jury petition that was going around to oust a1l11!h judicial district j4dges due to
conflicts of interest between them which was filed in case number 2015MR2P. During the J)etition drive to
try to 'get the signatures a radio ad was ran on 100.7 ESPN My Town Media which is owned by attorney Bill
Judgment Group and My Town Media. She wrote a private email on her regular job time- as a public
servant judge and she then had the nerve to profile the Summary Judgment Group and make standerous,
demeaning nicknames by calling anyone who signed it including "myself' "posse cometaut" because of
that Lori Fleming made typos in her slanderous insulting remarks or the fact that she can't simply spell the
word "posse comitatus' doesn't change the fact she insulted anyone who signed the petition and labeled us
in a political box now! Who is Kurt in the email? Is it Judge Kurt Loy was he in on this too?? Ithink since
the copy of the message sent to 100.7 ESPN was from the email address of <!fleming @11thjd.org> is from
a public judicial courthouse email address that the computer this was sent from needs to ~ taken during
the investigation and see how many other messages and emails were sent ex parte and about private
matters as well, I have included a copy of the picture going around the 11th judicial district which shows Lori
Fleming contacting 100.7 ESPN at 1:43 P.M. on February 19, 2015. Is this why the state has to have
should now have a permanent furlough and decrease about 70% of these government job~ since the public
servants don't want to perform their public job duties. I will be signing a class-action lawsuit now against
Lori Fleming in her private capacity since she was not performing her public ministerial duties or job
required voters due to her interference in a private business matter and constitutional grand jury petition.
Since the "GRAND JURY PETITON" was for the purpose to impeach the 11th district judges
I feel Lori Fleming violated Rule 4.1 since she is making speeches in her email to attorney
Bill Wachter about the possibility of losing her political job and she should not be calling
people "POSSE COMITATUS" 'WHICH IS A RACLt\L NAZI SLUR" WIDe-it Lite court of
Crawford County has been known to do in the past according to attorney Mark Fern in my
public court case number 14CV14P where attorney Mark Fern:filed a "MOTION TO STRIKE
THIRD-PARTY PETmON AGAINST DEFENDANTS FERN & ANGERMAYER LLC AND
STEPHEN B. ANGERMA YER AND FOR SANCTIONS" and he says on statement 5 page 2
comparing the Pro Se client to something called "Kansas Militia Members" ant\ on statement
MIllTIA"!!!! The statement of people representing themselves being "MILITIA" by the
11th
judicial district court is just one of the bias and prejudices under Rule 2.3, and due process
violations that led to the "GRAND JURY PETITION" to impeach all 11th district court judges.
Maybe attorney Mark Fern had spoken with Judge Lori Fleming since she was one of three
(3) district judge members of the court" in the 11thjudicial district in Crawford County in
2014 when that statement was made public when it was filed.
I don't feel confident going in front of Judge A.J. Wachter in case number ISCY38P since his
brother is the attorney that Lori Fleming was making "NAZI RACIAL SLURS" with and
calling me "posse comeataut". All judges in the 11thdistrict have now showed proof of bias
and prejudice against Pro Se litigants and Judge Wachter is the chief judge which should
violate Rule 2.12 for not properly supervising his employees. I also don't feel A], Wachter
should hear this case because Steve Stockard ofWilben
and Towner is an attorney in this
case and A.J. Wachter used to own Wilbert and Towner and Wilbert and Towner is the law
firm that is owned by My Town Media owner, attorney Bill Wachter who receives e-mails
from Lori Fleming which is unethical.
Please investigate this matter and assign a judge from
out of the 11th judicial district to hear this case under Rule 2.11 (A) Disqualification.
Very truly yours,
f~
James Beckley Jr.
t'-<;1e~ '1/-
'30 ~
CC Attorney General's Office

State Insurance Commissioner
tv.
w'l c.-K~'1
..cr tlldel'\4 C
1<<; to ~
7 (0 .3
MINTER & POLLAK

545 N. Woodlawn
Wichita, Kansas 67208
(316) 265-0797
DISTRICT COURT, CRAWFORD
COUNTY, KANSAS
CIVIL DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY
NATIONAL
BANK & TRUST,
)
Plaintiff,
V.
JAMES A. BECKLEY, SR., deceased,
JAMES A BECKLEY, JR.,
MICHAEL ANDREW EDWARDS,
UNKNOWN SPOUSE OF MICHAEL ANDREW
EDWARDS, UNKNOWN TENANT(S),
JESUS PIEDRA-SEGOVIA A/KIA JESUS PIEDRA,
MARIA LOPEZ, JUAN LOPEZ,
KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
FOR
CRAWFORD COUNTY et al.
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 15 CV 38-P
TITLE iNVOLVING
REAL ESTATE
Oeo
~y
FILE BY FAX
---------------------------------)
Pursuant to K.S.A. Chapter 60
(REAL ESTATE FORECLOSURE
ACTION)
MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS

COMES NOW, the Plaintiff, Community
dismiss the counterclaims
AGAINST
PLAINTIFF
National Bank & Trust for its Motion to
asserted by the Defendant James A. Beckley, Jr. pursuant to
K.S.A. 60-212(b) and in support of said request states as follows:

1) Plaintiff is entitled to judgment on all counterclaims and defenses
In this matter the Defendant James Beckley, Jr. has asserted numerous
defenses and counterclaims
dismissed pursuant
to
which have no basis under Kansas law and should be
K.S.A. 60-212(b )(1) for lack of subject-matter
jurisdiction
or 60-
212(b )(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Given the nature
CERTIFICATE
The undersigned
above and foregoing
OF MAILING
hereby certifies that on this 20th day of May, 2015 the original
Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims
Against Plaintiff was deposited in
the United States Mail, postage prepaid and properly addressed to:
James A. Beckley, Jr.
302 W. McKay
Frontenac, KS 66763
Kip Sagehorn
Loy & Sagehorn, LLC
P.O. Box B
Pittsburg, KS 66762
Steve Stockard
Wilbert & Towner, PA
506 N. Pine
Pittsburg, KS 66762
COil ~):
ct
1< u \~ ~
\ \ tf\
bl.
6.iI:
r,z""TI'!'$f?
*.
~'
.~
~j);
~er:.d31
Jurlg'!filing d.t.:
Case sub::.'PS:
Commem
Prs.iotis
cass:
Plaintiff
Community
Attorney:
Pollak,
1 oIl
Bank & Trust
National
Creath
bC
Send notices:
Utigant Options
lAitOm"y!AI'~
1)B~DchWa.':.'ants
Post-actve:
C.,.mment:
OBondslAliQ)
:(j
Gamisnme:ms
o Orders
Counter claim3nt:
Counter dei&ndanl:
CiOSS claimant
Cross def&ndani.
C
,_l
Third porty defendant:
r_1
Imer ....
rancr
Third party ~~3jntiff:
Amicus
---.r
!"":-.
curiae:
Journal entry require-d:

JOtJma~ ~Tltr'l dele:
Created by: KV on 04iOE ,,015 10:15 ft}~1
Party
lnterpleador:
,,-
Hen party:
f)
Other ""rty:
o Supervisions
Amount claimed.
0010010000
U-pdate,{by: f<:..t on 04!W2015
.00
Oocumcut
Service
o TIme limits
o Trusis
lG:16NIJ
Costs
No costs' assessed
,--y-.--w------1r------;
I b.S~elJ... E:n(l~-~t ~sef',,1a!1 :M Cl)aoge-~ase Type f
C~t\
k'd"
-'--_.
t...JG\c...~ \--ey
h r.:-rT--h@ v:
__
: Images_;
0-e.
f!:/, f I
)LJ))j~
lt1 C\~
wk~;I'
~,-1-eY'
<
., ---
-J
--!
I
---1
--'1
(Z)
FILED
COUNir,KANSAS
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF CRAWFORD
Community
National
i4
Bank & Trust,

Plaintiff.
MAR14 P 2 :04
14 CV 14 P
vs.
James A. Beckley, Jr., and the unknown
heirs, executors, administrators,
devisees,
trustees, creditors and assigns of such of
the defendant as may be deceased and
the unknown spouses of the defendant;
)
the unknown officers, successors,
trustees.)
creditors and assigns of such defendant
)
as are existing, dissolved or dormant
)
corporations;
the unknown executors,
)
administrators,
devisees, trustees,
}
creditors, successors
and assigns of such }
defendant as are or were partners or in
}
partnership;
and the unknown guardians,
}
conservators,
and trustees of such of the
)
defendant as are minors or are in
)
anywise under legal disability; and the
)
unknown heirs. executors,
administrators,
)
devisees, trustees, creditors, and assigns of)
any person alleged to be deceased.
)
)
}
Defendants.
~-=~~~~~==~~--------)
PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 60 OF
KANSAS 5T A rUTES
ANNOTATED
MOTION TO STRIKE THIRD-PARTY PETITION AGAINST DEFENDANTS

FERN & ANGERMAYE~
LLC AND STEPHEN B. ANGERMAYER
AND FOR SANCTIONS
Come now third-party defendants
Fern & Angermayer,
LtC and Stephen B.
Angermayer by and through their attorney Mark E. Fern and for their motion to strike
the third-party petition against them and for sanctions state:
1. Plaintiff, Community
National Bank & Trust, a financial institution, organized

1
existing, and doing business under and by virtue of law, filed a petition in this action
against the defendant James A. Beckley Jr. for defaulting on a promissory
note and to
foreclose a security interest

2. The defendant,
answer
to the
James A. Beckley, Jr., was properly served and filed a pro-58
plaintiff's petition.
3. Defendant Beckley filed a pro-se, third-party complaint against all parties he

believed were involved in the suit. He made third-party allegations
for the plaintiff bank, Stephen B. Anqerrnayer
against the attorney
and his firm. the president of the bank,
Tony Stonerock, and the sheriff's deputy, Robert Peters, who served the defendant with
the summons and petition.
4. The third-party defendant also filed complaints against all third-party
defendants with various regulatory authorities. He filed a complaint against bank's
counsel with the Kansas Office of Disciplinary Administrator,
against the Bank President
with the Comptroller of Currency, and against the sheriff's deputy with the Crawford
'J
County Sheriff's Department.
,--1
-i-
7.
5. Third-party defendant tactics, as set out above mirror what this court has
'.~
received in prior cases from Kansas Militia members.
-----------~
6. The statute on third-party practice states as follows:

Statute 60-214: Third-party practice. (a) When defendant may bring in third
party At any time after commencement of the action a defending party, as a
third-party plaintiff, may cause a summons and petition 10 be served upon a
person not a party to the action who is Of may be liable to the third-party plaintiff
for all or part of the plaintiff's claim against the third-party plaintiff. The third-party
plaintiff need not obtain leave to make the service if the third-party plaintiff files
the third-party petition not later than 10 days after serving the original answer.
Otherwise the third-party plaintiff must obtain leave on motion upon notice to all
parties to the action. The person served with the summons and third-party
. .f lJ2)li~..s'iL'
.-0 l ,
-.
v+(; J.
/
Wcvt4R1
t;(vr T-
&6 (
l\ ~-;e.
~~
CD .) f' "
14. The Third-party
~~f
harassment
plaintiff has interposed the third-party
claim for the purpose
and delay. His tactics are what this court commonly
associates
with the
Kansas Militia. Their pleadings are typically !~Iedp;o-se ~ith a convoluted 'reference to
'----Kansas statutes. Often the alleged facts are untrue, and the Militia's hallmark is an
------
extreme anti-government
------
ideology along with elaborate conspiracy
theories.
15. In Wood v. Groh, 269 Kan. 420, 431, 7 P.3d 1163 (2000) the court listed the
following factors to be considered
by the court when awarding sanctions
against a party
who violates KSA 60-211:
(1) whether the improper conduct was willful or negligent;

(2) whether it was part of a pattern of activity or an isolated event;
(3) whether it infected the entire pleading or only one particular count or
defense;
(4) whether the person has engaged in similar conduct in other litigation;
(5) whether it was intended to injure;
(6) what effect it had on the litigation process in. time or expense;
(7) whether the responsible person is trained in the law;
(8) what amount, given the financial resources of the responsible person, is
needed to deter that person from repetition in the same case; and
(9) what amount is needed to deter similar activity by other litigants.
Id.
16. The movants request that the court find the Third-party
plaintiff has filed his
fhird-party claim in violation of KSA 60-211, and awards them attorney's

this response and attending
WHEREFORE,
any subsequent
Third-Party
hearings in this matter,
Defendants,
by reason of the matters above set forth
above, are entitled to have the third-party claims against them dismissed
The movants are entitled to an award of attorney's fees for defending
any subsequent
hearings, and for such other.relief
fees for filing
with prejudice.
this action and for
that the court deems proper.

Topeka Ks 66612
THIS COMPLAINT
USURPATION
IS AGAINST lFH DISTRICT JUDGE LORI BOLTON FLEMING FOR
OF OFFICE UNDER K.s.A. 60-1201, K.5.A. 60-1202(1)(2)(4)(5),
1205, K.S.A. 60-1206(a)(b),

JUDICIAL CONDUCT
Uniform
KS.A. 60-
of RULE5 RELATING TO
Rule 601A, and Rule 5.4 of The
Bonding Code.
I recently signed a grand jury petition that was going around to oust all 11thjudicial district Ndges due to
conflicts of interest between them which was filed in case number 2015MR2P. During the p'etition drive to
Judgment Group and My Town Media. She wrote a private em ail on her regular job tim&'fs a public
servant judge and she then had the nerve to profile the Summary Judgment Group and make slanderous,
What Lori Fleming called anyone that signed the grand jury petition is really "possecomital.\Js". The fact
that Lori Fleming made typos in her slanderous insulting remarks or the fact that she .can't~imply spell the
in a political box now! Who is Kurt in the email? Is it Judge Kurt Lay was he in on this too?? I think since
the copy of the message sent to 100.7 ESPN was from the email address of </fleming @11thjd.org> is from
a public judicial CO.urthouseemail address that the computer.this was sent from needs to ~ taken during
the investigation and see how many other messages and emails were sent ex parte and aQPut private
matters as well. I have included a copy of the picture going around the 11thjudicial district which shows Lori
should now have a permanent furlough and decrease about 70% of these government job, since the public
servants don't want to perform their public job duties. I will be signing a class-act1onlawsuit now against
Lori Fleming in her private capacity since she was not performing her public ministerial duties or job
descriptions by interfering ina radio ad and damaging the summary judgment group and not getting the
Since the "GRAND JURY PETITON" was for the purpose to impeach the 11th district judges
I feel Lori Fleming violated Rule 4.1 since she is making speeches in her e mail
to
attorney
Bill Wachter about the possibility of losing her political job and she should not be calling
people "POSSE COMITATUS" "WHICH IS A RACIAL NAZI SLUR" which the court of
Crawford County has been known to do in the past according to attorney Mar~ Fern in my
public court case number 14CV14P where attorney Mark Fern filed a "MOTION TO STRIKE
THIRD-PARTY PETITION AGAINST DEFENDANTS FERN & ANGERMAYER LLC AND
STEPHEN B. ANGERMAYER AND FOR SANCTIONS" and he says on statement 5 page 2
comparing the Pro Se client to something called "Kansas Militia Members" am;\on statement
MILITIA"!!!! The statement of people representing themselves being "MILITIA" by the 11th
judicial district court is just one of the bias and prejudices under Rule 2.3, and due process
violations that led to the "GRAND JURY PETITION" to impeach all l l= district court judges.
Maybe attorney Mark Fern had spoken with Judge Lori Berning since she was one of three
(3) district judge members of "the court" in the 11th judicial district in Crawford County in
2014 when that statement was made public when it was filed.
Very truly yours,
-/~a./~~'f"
James Beckley Jr.
36 ~ tv.
<7-<',
Wlc...1<' CI. -r fY", v\ieVI~c, l{ S
~~7 b '3
06/17/2015
Memorial Hall
120 SW 10th AVE.,2nd Floor
Topeka, Ks 66612
Dear D. Depew,
RE: Ouster Complaint and Bond Complaint under 5.4 Uniform Bonding Code
that was not mentioned
Please reconsider the June 10, 2015 letter that was sent from your office to Mr. Eric Muathe
and Mr. Noah Day and the Summary Judgment Group. The Summary Judgment Group
recently had a grand jury petition that was going around to oust all 11th judicial district
judges due to conflicts of interest between them and local 11th judicial district attorneys.
During the petition drive to try to get the signatures a radio ad was ran on 100.7 ESPN of
My Town Media which is owned by attorney Bill Wachter, Judge Andrew J. Wachter's
brother. After just 2 days of running the advertisement on the air Judge Lori Fleming took
it upon herself to use her power inappropriately as a judge and to usurp/intrude into a
private business contract between Summary Judgment Group and My Town Media and
have our ad breached on 2/19.2015 at 1:43 P.M. from her own judicial office with an email
of <lt1eming @l1thjd.org> where she "WILLFULLY ENGAGEDIN MISCONDUCT WHILE
IN OFFICE, AND SHE IS COMMITTED AN ACT THAT CONSTITUTES A VIOLATION OF A
PENAL STUATUTE INVOLVING MORAL TURPITUDE" just like you said in your letter
dated June 10,2015" which is set out in KS.A. 60-1205 where a public official must
engage in one of the following acts to forfeit his/her office and be ousted".
Please reconsider the Ouster Complaint that was dismissed since I have now included the
email from Lori Bolton's Judicial Office which shows her engaging in 1. Willfull
misconduct while in office and 4. She violated a penal statute by committing an act
which involved moral turpitude by usurping into a private contract and calling us
demeaning names like "posse comeat", I appreciate you taking the time to explain what
an ouster complaint needs to be investigated and I am looking forward to Lori Fleming
being investigated for moral turpitude and willful misconduct. I would also like for you to
clarify on the "BONDTERMINATION OF LORI FLEMING"which your office failed to
mention anything about. Does your office hold the Insurance Bond on the judges in the
State of Kansas or does the Kansas State Insurance Commissioner? Can the Kansas State
Insurance Commissioner oust a judge itself by simply refusing to give a judge any insurance
and making him unable to work because the judge would be unbondable under Rule 5.4 of
The Uniform Bonding Code? I was under the impression that there was no more public law
and it was just public policy which is insurance and I just assumed that The Kansas State
Insurance Commissioner could basically oust a judge themselves and was just curious if I
was correct in my assumption or not. Thank you for your time and I would really
appreciate you looking into this matter since I have included proof and evidence of moral
turpitude and willful misconduct while not only in office but "USURPINGINTO PRIVATE
CONTRACTS"which is a constitutional violation of Article 1 Section 10 "unlimited
right to contract" and not performing ministerial and judicial task while clocked in
on 2/19/2015 at 1:43 P.M.and talking inappropriately to the 11thdistrict ChiefJudge
A.J.Wachter's brother attorney Bill Wachter who should be investigated as well for
moral turpitude and willful misconduct.
Lori Fleming and Kurtis Loy received an informal letter for "supposedly" not knowing
about illegally running a phone book ad as an attorney on February 23,2015 that I have
included with this complaint. It shows Lori Fleming and Kurtis Loy both retaliated against
me/us from previous complaints which violates Rule 2.16 Cooperation with Disciplinary
Authorities(B) which says "Ajudge shall not retaliate, directly or indirectly, against a
person known or suspected to have assisted or cooperated with an investigation of a judge
or a lawyer. There should be some kind of"FORMAL PROCEEDING"if the Kansas
Commission on Judicial Qualifications plans to show any kind of consistency from previous
complaints because an email from a judicial computer at the 11thdistrict on company time
to breach a private contract is way worse than "NAMESAND NUMBERS"running the ad for
Lori Fleming and Kurtis Loy as attorneys and they both "SUPPOSEDLY"knew nothing about
it!! Well Lori Fleming and Kurtis Loy did know about this emaiI because Lori Fleming sent
it and Judge Kurt Loy collaborated just like he did in my previous cases with ex law partner,
attorney Mark Werner. What I also find to be either willful misconduct is the fact that Lori
Fleming faxes warrants from her own private fax number which she also uses for Lady of
Lourdes Church to conduct her judicial business on but she uses the computer from the
11tit judicial district with her addressed as Honorable Lori Fleming to usurp/intrude and
breach a private radio advertisement and willfully slandered me and The Summary
Judgment Group by calling us "Posse Comeat" which is a spelling error for Posse Comitatus
The definition of Posse Comitatus says it is also the name taken by a right wing, antitax extremist group founded in 1969 by Henry L. Beach a retired dry cleaner and one
time member of the silver shirt, nazi inspired organization that was established in
the United States after Adolph Hitler came to power in Germany. The group
operated on the belief that the true intent of the founders of The United States was to
establish a Christian Republic where the individual was sovereign.
Please investigate this matter and check the computers of all three 11tit district judges to
see just how many other demeaning and dirty nicknames they have called me because I
filed a "Motion for Quo Warranto" against them. There are other pictures from the 11th
judicial district computers which shows they have slandered me and talked ex-parte to
local area attorneys. Please investigate this matter as I intend to produce these emails at a
later date to see if you actually do your job like Idid previously form my complaints back in
November and December of 2014 on Crestwood and Lady of Lourdes Conflicts ofInterest
which everyone acted like Iwas crazy and then "WE SEE THE EMAILFROM LORI FLEMING
TO ATTORNEYBILL WACHTER"just like I was saying the whole time!! Good ole boy
network, Go Colgan and Go Crestwood enjoy hogging 95% of the areas money while the
rest of us enjoy being the poorest county yet were the biggest town in the SEK!!!l!!!
Please investigate this matter and take the computer( s) from the 11th judicial district this
email came from or where this and other communications were sent to could have been
sent to!!!!
Sincerely yours,
Eric Muathe
,/ CCKansas Commission on judicial Qualifications
,/ State Insurance Commissioner
,/ Office of Disciplinary Administrator
._-----------_._-
~tate of 1San~a~
~
~
QCommi~~ion on Jlubitial @ualificationg

KANSAS JUDICIAL CENTER
301 SWTE.l\rrHAVE., ROOM 374
785-296-2913
judicialquaI@kscourts.org
MEMBERS OF
PANEL A
CHAm:
WiUiam B. Swearer
Lawyer Member
VICE-CHAIR:
February 23,2015
Eric M. Muathe
muathedotcom@gmail.com
Your complaint dated January 26, 2015, against District Judges
Lori Bolton Fleming and Kurtis L Loy
Christina M. Pannbacker
Lay Member
Re:
Nancy S. Anstaett
La.,ryerMe:mber
Dear Mr. Muathe:
J. Pa1.ricl~Bra-.;il
The Commission met February 13, 2015, at which time the above-captioned
complaint was considered.
Judge Me:mber
Brenda CiUlleron
Judge Memher
It was the decision of the Commission, regarding both Judge Fleming and
Judge Loy, to fmd no violation but to offer informal advice to both judges to take
affirmative action to rectify the appearance that they have an active law practice.
Mary Thrower
Judge Member
Thank you for bringing your concerns to the attention of the Commission.
VaId.enia C. Winn
Lay Member
Sincerely,
SECRETARY:
Heather L. Smith
William B. Swearer,
Chair .
nun
Kansas Insurance Departrnent

Ken Selzer[ CPA Comnlissioner of Insurance
1
June 11,2015
LESTER MOORE
508 E. VIENER LOT Al
FRONTENAC KS 66763
Re:
Inquiry Case No. 57690
Dear Mr. Moore:

This office received the enclosed complaint addressed to the Kansas Commission on Judicial
Qualifications. It appears that you mailed the letter to the incorrect office. This office has no
regulatory control over the issues involved in your complaint.
Sincerely,
Scott A. Smith
Attorney
Property and Casualty Unit
Consumer Assistance Division
Enclosure:
420 SW
sm Street
Topeka,Kansas 666r2-1678
785-2%-7829 Phone
Consumer Hotline
785-296-5806 Fax
800-432-2484
Website
wwwksinsurance.org
~\Z\~~151~
~\:j
.\(~
Juoeg"2015
Kansas Commission on Judicial Qualifi~tions
301 S.w. Tentil Avenue

Topeka Ks 6.6612msuHtu!~~~li~E~~\;f7
i;lEHT
THIS COMPLAINT 1S AGAINST 11TH DISTRlCT JUf)GE lQRI'SQlTONftEMtNG .fOR.

USURPATION Of OFFlC UNDERK.S.A. 60~t201.KS.A.60"l2Q2(1}(2}(4)(t)}. K.s:.~~.501205. K.j.A.60~12n6(al{bJ~KS.A..604~f}i,an~Jgl"\liQlpfiOllsofRULES.~rINvt(D '"
. .JU&llCONl'I.)CT (01)EO~~U~I'C~L~aND~Gl''J~,ttre.60JA.
.'
. '~~gtaM4UiJs4etitiOO lh(ltwasgtiil1garounlito~~tan 1111l iucfreialdi~~
. .,
. .'wlllctlwas1i~.ln~case.nuritller20t5MR2P; OUIjrng,~
ad wastranqn10~.7~eSPNMy!nwnMedia'VihiCllisow'
Wacb~r.:A1terjl1st2daysof running QJ,ltheairJ~fP,!'i'fremmfl;tookitupon'~elfJti.
~~~~.~
.....
,.,
.z: ".;,
....
$a,
'Bnd,Shelhenhad1htln~top~.thaSutmnafYJudQment,GrouP~~k,~sf~~~~
dem~lf1griiCknamesby.Q8Ujngal1yarte:Whosigned itinctuding #myselr ftposse~lW~eof
myPQ1ltIcai'v1ewS t6:s1mPtyslgn aconstitutibnm grand jury petitkm,
-.
"
What toriAemjngcan~anyone that signed the grand jury petition is really "posse comatatus". The fact
that loriFtemin~J:'made typos in her slanderous insulting remarkS or thefacHhatshe cant~iJJl,plyspelHhe
word "posSe comitatus" doesn't chang~thefaotshe insulted anyone whosignedthepefitioA,andtabeled 'us
in a pollticaLbox noWl Who is Kurt in ~ smail? Is it JudgeKurtLoywasneinonthisloo?? t thinkSinee:
theCQPyoffue messagesenHo 1{X}] ESPN wasframthe efIlailaddressfJf<ffiemmg-@11thjd.0fi>isfmm
';apub1ic judiCialcoortbouseemaiiaddl'e8Sthat theOOnl,PtAt)rthis.cYl$ssentfrOm
. .'
thefnvestig~tlolli~~.see.ho'lll,tll~nyoUlef:m~~ag.~~!pl"ldem~llsWer~sent
..e
1tl~~rsias~W$n;lllavejrJcluded
aoopy:Ofthepjctu~cgQingaround
the 11tllud~' .'...
,'..................
' .,.'... '.,'100.7 SSPNat1:43;P.h.tQnF~brvaryl~,2Q15.:1stb~;~~"
bu$tr1essontiJ~fS~'
abom70%.Ofthesegovenuneotiqbssin~the
.."~"mdOiijhsiS~~oUrpubficSef\lantSa~conduttingprivate
should noW have a~anehtJurlough'and'decrease
.eublic
, . .".~an~4o~tV!~~H(}perf0EmJlJejrpU~icj9bdUties.lwifH'~.$igll~acf~ti.'.
..
. .t
,..."
..
c;;;c>
...
'. ....tlfl,j!lheLpl'1vatecapacilY~i~,sflewasootperfmmilJg~~f,pubilelTllni$t~~;':C'F~/\';~
i;t<',; .;\J.Ci
, .,.'.'",/,,:~c~iPJiQ~byjnterfen1)gifHHa~waq;i~ddamaginstheSUJnf1l8IJj~~tIt~~and~,Q~...
. ' r~,{2)"ji~l;;~~);,
.reqtlIredvotelSdueto.berinterfetenOOtnaprivatebqS~ma~ta~:~$titUttpnaJg~d';lUlYpeijll~;,...
._'.
. '>",_
--...
<",.~:::-:_"."
--,'i",.:,;':.>"
VerytrulyVOUlS,
Lester Moore 508 E. Viener, lot A1, FrontenacKs 66763
dr.~
o/7t-M-~
CC Attorney Generafs Office and StateJnsurance Commissioner
...,:
'--::_',"-"'-'''-''.'..:",:"

Topeka Ks 66612
USURPAT10N OF-OFFICE UNDER K.S.A. 60-1201. K.S.A. 60-1202(1)(2)(4}~5), KS.A. 601205. K.S.A. 60-1206(a}(b). K.S.A. 60-1207 and for violations of RULESRElATING TO
JUDICIAL CONDUCT CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT Rule 601A
conflicts of interest between them which was filed in case number 2015MR2P. During the-petition drive to
try to get the signatures a radio ad was ran on 100.7 ESPN My Town Media which is
by attorney Bill
Judgment Group and My Town Media. She wrote a private emBiI on her regular job time as a public
servant judge and she then had the nerve to profile the Summary Judgment Group and l1)ake slanderous,
demeaning nicknames by calling anyone who signed it including "myselF ('posse
~ur
because of
my politiCal views to simply sign a constitutional grand jury petition.
0_
What Lori Fleming called anyone that signed the grand jury petition is really 'posse comatatus The fact
that Lori Fleming made typos in her slanderous insulting remarks or the fact that she can't "mply spell the
word "posse comitatus doesn't change the fact she insulted anyone who signed the,petition and labeled us
in a political box now! Who is Kurt in the email? Is it Judge Kurt Loy was he in on this too?? Ithink since
the investigation and see how many other messages and emails were sent ex parte and abput private
matters as well. I have included a copy of the picture going around the 11th judicial district ~ich shows Lori
Fleming contacting 100] ESPN at 1:43 P.M. on FehruaJy 19,2015. Is this why the state has to have
should now have a permanent furlough and decrease about 70% of these government jobs since the public
servants don't want to perform their public job duties. Iwill be signing a class-action la~uit now against
Lori Fleming in her private capacity since she was not performing her public ministerial dyties or job
D
Very truly yours,

Karen Cariton 606 W. 2nd
1(a;UftJ
fadlrl//L)
June 11,2015
CHETSTOVER
303 S. JEFFERSON
FRONTENAC KS 66763
Re:
Dear Mr. Stover:

Enclosure:
420 sw 9th Street

Topeka,Kansas 66612-
785-296-7829
1678
Phone
785-29~-5806 Fax
Consumer Hotline
800-432-2484
Website
wwwksinserance.org
b'-'1,-/6
Kansas Commission on Judicial Qualfflcations .

Topeka Ks 66612
THISCOMPtA1NT IS AGAINST 11TH DISTRICT JUDGE LOR1.BOtTON flEMINC.FOR
USURPATiON Of OFfiCE UNqER K.S.A.60~12Ql. K.S.A. 60-12(J20}I21{4J~5)~KS.A. 601205" K.S~A.60~l206(arfbJ.K.5.A.. 60~1207andfor viOiationsofRUlES
JUDICJAL.CONDtJCTCQDE. OFJY~}~lld ..-COM"'VCT1<ule.6().lA.:,,
:..
,',"'
',-c';c
-"j'"_.'
~TI~IO:
.;j"i,."",<?
....,,~,."'";..
......
/:.':~~{:~\~'~"
..' ,.!;recen.Uy,signe<.ls.graIlG jury petition ~twa$ g~Ulgar0un4looust all 11#1 iudiefatal~t~~~;"

tenfftctso.Unlemstbetweenthemwnicb
w~file41rrc~IlUrtlber2P15MR2P.. D~!irig";~.
try to get the signatures a radio ad was ran on 100.7 ESPN MyTaWl'! Megia~ieh ts oWn~:byattom:ySill
Wachter. Alter just 2 days-of nmningqfiibe air JI149.e.iJmfJe.rningfG9k-it
'er
:"~,",
lnapprqpriately as a juageana to usurppntrude infag'R~ate:.~Ii~fn.esS:contr
JudglllenlSroup;and My TOwn Media.;'She.Wrofeaprivaie: emaildtl.fi~rJ~9
.servantjudye:ood sheiheflhadtMnerve~toprofileth~SUmrrtafy
JllO~meRtGrouFl". .....
.... . ....." , ................
demeaning nicknames by camng anyo4t:.wnosigneditincludillQ
ItmyselrU~~futll~~US'e:df
my political views to simply sign acooStitutional grand jury pention.
uponlle: ."-
What Lori Fleming ~Ied anyone that sIgned the grand jury petition is really 'posse eomatalus", The fact
that Lori Fleming made typos in herslarderous insulting remarks or the fact that she-canft~implyspeU the
word posseoomitatusl' doesrft cn(1ngethe fact she insulted anyone whosignedthe'pefitio(land.fabeled
us
.in a political box noWl Who is Kurt in Hieemail? Is it Judge Kurt toy was he inon1ttisfOOf?t think since
.. ~~ C9,py-:~ttfle-tl1essagesentto 100.7 ESPNwas fromtl1e~mail
aqdress of<lfleming@11thjd;tlrg>isfmm
;~,:p:Ubji~~!1aiC1~t'~rJhouseemaifaddress
thqt the
ute(:fuisYmsent-fro~n~s, ....
.
:1hein~i:stlgatiQn.a!ld~SeeAOWmanY oillerm . '..
.' .ai!~were:senteX'{fafte:
;T"/"ina.tfef:S-~\iJen;ihav~-incfuded a coPYJJfthe picfurcgoingaroundthe
11U1jUaici~l.... .
,',' '. Flemmg,wiitactj~g'100J7'ESPN
at 1:4atP:M.onFebmmy. 4~,~n1t>~
ls tbj!?~Wh~J!he,~~,r~~v'e.i+;r~;{:,\,
furloughs is because eer pabtie servan~ are comIDctlngpr:ivae busm-ess on faxpayeis
The'stat~ .
sl1ouldJlOWhaV&'fj pennanentfuAOLrgb:andde~
about7Q%pf1hese,govemment1Qb,s
sinQf1tn6 Pllblic
' .
5etYa~~:#On~wa?t10performtheir:pu~licjobGuies;1
Willbe~i9niflg~~d~S:o~'m1.
,. .
"'~J~L "., r~".:}";~:';;
, ..'/14o,~ fl~m,i!1gintlerprjvateGapacity since.shawas not perforffljngheJ'i)UPltcfflIn~t~~
'''. .
.;":':\!~:',~-i';'\:];0
'
aeseripfionsby iilterleringillifraai& ~~nddamaglnythesummarylqqgmentgro -,. . ........
....) ,'..: . '....'7.'''t,~',)y,:c.::"~,
mn~:
required.wOtersd~to.herio~renqe:tfiaprivate1!usinessmatter
Very truLy-yours,
Chet Stover 303 S, Jefferson F. on-te:oes Ks66'763
~SOfficemmsmmm_noo~
~!;!dCGnstitu1ion~l'g~djurY'~titien:
.C
C'h.~
. ')
C)
st61)Q
'3 S. xf./elS6
r:{t>n~.q{.)(5
JI'\
fc4, 7~3
5~ic 1. ns uf ~.'f)(e UMr.rS5~~ (
4)~54; 1f~
r~~G;!;fa i:e.l.
1
2,a'lj,IlI' ,11" '"",'II.Ilil",, ,Ii,' "1',,1,,./.11/ 1,,1
Kansas Insurance Department

Ken Selzer: CPA,Commissioner
ofInsurance
June 11,2015
JOE STOVER
303 S. JEFFERSON
FRONTENAC KS 66763
Re:
Dear Mr. Stover:

Scott A. Smith
Attorney
Property and Casualty Unit
Consumer Assistance Division
Enclosure:
420 SW 9th Street
Topeka,Kansas
66612-1678
785-296-7829 phone
785-2%-5806
Fax
Consumer Hotline
800-432-2484
website
wwwkstnsurance.org
lG'8'1
-x-V\\~ cr(B
~f4e-
--::)PYI e
61) ;to 15
Kansas Commission on Judicial Qua!iflcat.ions

301 S,w. Tenth Avenue
THlS COMPLAINT is AGAINST tiTH DfSTR1CT JUDGE LORl BOLTON FLEMING FOR
USURPATION OF OffICE UNDR K..S.A., 60-1201. K.5.A. 6t;:12{}2(1)(2}(4j(5). KS.A. 601205.,KS.A.,60-1206(a)(b)~K}.A.
60-1207 8.wfof'vioiauom,ofRULES
RELATING to
""'::!~~;~~~~~~~~
:cJtJW6t~t,:COMDUcr CODE 'OF JUD1(]At CONI.>U(J,.Rute

''''!''''':i,,'':';j\''''~i.'C''
60lA.
'
tty trJgeftheosignafures a t.adioaIfwas!ran{mfOO:1:E$PN~M9~'fownMeaia'Which:rs,~w'_

,',','"ij~t
WaGhter. After just 2 days ofrunnmg.
ti'ieairJud.ge ton,F~emtngtook.ituponber$elf fouse-oer POVN;F
"
- _ -,
mappropriateJY as a-judge and 10 ll$UIpl!ntmde.into a f1riJ.ate~riescontract-between
SUmmalj' :-.
,,",:.',
,-, , ' ,_' ". "Judg~~up-ancf
My'TOWl) Media.,~bewrotefap'~ate~mail~herregafarj()btime"asg,-pubt~t-~',',.~:: ::,",,,,;,',,
,.,"'....
.':';+ '~MiQtjidge:anCtshe,tfletl had the-netNe topr{lfjl~lhe:S((mpJaIYJ~tnerttGroup.an(f1.I.l~~~~Ji: ';':"~:'c.".,,',,,',,"-,'
demeani~~:nicknam~bYcalling,anYOlW WhO signed it including, Qm~posse,eornef%~,'
-'~"my polifiGal views.to"-simplysign cim$~:~tiQnafgrand.jwypelition~ ,
,','
on
Wilat Lo!'tFlamin~calted anYOfl~that signed-thegrandjuIY petitionistealiy vposse-comat~tos,~: Thefaet

that Lmi fleming ri'iade typos inher ~ero.us
insulting renlaJks-ar'iheJact that ~hecan~f~rmpiy:p\Mhe
worct'posss comitatUs dOO.Sfllchange1he tagt she insulte(lan)'OneB1tJ signed:tne peti!ion~d labeled'U$
in a poUlital box nnwJ Who is Kurt in tb~erriail? Is it Judge Kurt (oJ was he in on trus too?? I think since
the cof}Y:Qfthe message sent to,100.7 ~.sPNwas from 1he emait-addr$s of <ffieming,@11thjd.oJ'> is from
._~~pupl~t~3JCoorthouS.eemai!
addt$sthatthecorrtpt!terthis
was.senffrom needs to ,be ~akenqqrigg
" ttleinwstigaJion:~d'see-hOW many other messagesanQema~swere~lltexppne
d ',.u'
m~rterS-as~Il.},halle}!1CIUded,a,oopy~f
, : ,:.,
thePictfJ~:,gOi~9,~roundthe:t1?!~d~!lgi~(,;;',,:,.~_;',r,',{~,~,'".'t"_~,;,!ii;:fJ'~(4,E,~,:,~_:.,,;,',.,::;,h,
)~fjD~pOIl7
ESPNar1:43iP.M~oj} FeWuary':19,2{)15.ls'fhisWfit~:
:,
_<
<'"
I1g. s'iSbeCal1liuutpubncserval'l~areoondueting,priV~~fbUSinf;Ss'ol't~~~rs-tim$;,,~~t~; ,~,

".,'
.:,
shouldnow have a permanent 4ur-loughand decrease aboutZ~%ofthe~gol/emment jobs ~inc~ lOOPl1oft;
~~~nts;40Jl'twan~.t~
petforoHheir public jobdoties: I willresigningacrass-actiOlll?WiUW~Q"'.~aitlst
,:;,b.oliFIMlin~in.her:Priyate ~apasjty~sinre she was not,perfomlirig her puolib 1l1in~teriaf4.~~~,f)f;i~lf.".'
, EJescriptioos by inteifering in a radio ad andrklmaging the' summary judgmentgroup andnQt.geftjjigfuFJ "
requited voters due to ,her interfer-enceif} a private business matter~rlij.congtifutiona{giand jury:~fion.
Very truiy yours,
lOver ~ronle!lac
ks 60,63
, ,Attomey General's 'Office and State}bsuranee CommiSSioner
,
:
..
Jb'~ s~Vl'e('
? 6 ''9
Ft'dvt~'1~(
S. -Se(lft~(j n
t5
,(p
t b '3
S tctk.
y)O
1J1SU{qIJ6e (..f) #llrd5Sfclt'let
<S' Lv q'A,
E'f::.Tti?~4~sk<;b 6fmt%,~I",J{lIlJltltll1hmll'lllllll'lfl)lllllljlhlt
June 11,2015
Office Of Tbe Attorney Gen~ral
Memorial Hall,120 SW 10TH AVE., 2ndFloor
Topeka Ks 66612
THIS COMPLAINT
USURPATION
FLEING,
FOR
K.S.A. 60-
1205, K.S.A. 60-1206(a)(b). K.S.A. 60-1207 and for violations of RULES RELATING TO
JUDICIAL CONDUCT
Rule 601A.
I recently signed a grand jury petition that was going around to oust a1l11lh judicial districij~dges due to
conflicts of interest between them which was filed in case number 2015MR2P. During the [}ention drive to
Judgment Group and My Town Media. She wrote a private email on her regular job time ~ a public judge
and she then had the nerve to profile the Summary Judgment Group and make slanderousj demeaning
nicknames by calling anyone who signed it including "myself' "posse cometaut" because of my political
views to simply sign a constitutional grand jury petition which Ihave a constitutional right to do.
I think since the copy of the message sent to 100.7 ESPN was from the emaHaddress of ~~Ieming
@11thjd.org> is from a public judicial courthouse email address that the computer thi, was sent from
needs to be taken during the investigation and see how many other messages and emails were sent ex
parte and about private matters as well. I have included a copy of the picture going around the 11th judicial
district which shows Lori Fleming contacting 100.7 ESPN at 1:43 P.M. on February 19, 2015 which is
extremely unethical.
Please investigate this-matter since I used to work for the City of Pittsburg and was a city employer and I
know that if I would have sent a private email on company time and it was proved I would have been
reprimanded or fir~ "ESPECIALLY IF IT W~RFERE
IN A PRIVATE CONTRACT"!
SiocerelyYOurs,Oanocf.
<J~
Dan Stevens 1051 S. 190 Pittsburg Ks 66762

AGf+j~S7
(OfY\plC{;I\f-
,r. S. A. k o ~
-:J
J~
f1dU
IDt~ fle"Y'~t'l3
j v~5,.p5.
I
C\ ppr~c~ o..+-eh
Plt?q~-e
K S.J4. 0b-i~()~/
6~j
Jic,'o.\ Co
e+ !?o le:
~/)+-erft"r-e'cA
'7;9j')~c\
~ ~ 1)3
look
cq \\ e 6
p. 0 , Box' JQ Li
(fli)-tu
J( ),1/. be>
~D \
~I'\
IJo
)(~.14.0i>-I?oj/
Uf)4tY
l '3 ;:"Y'
\);6
lo...1lalJ5
A,
C\
+-t~-e.. bVtlVld
CG.J~o jAJ...
+6oLJsf
JU'('Y
(J.Q.4-).-.f-!/);/l
jA-l' )
~(\~
\-l-""
cl.Dn
r I Po S~-eCO V1\.et-q Q t ))I.
; ~\i--b \..J~y tkjl<) w~s sel'\.+
0\; Sir ~c...+.
P;#<sbur
16/).1- .f/emiI)3
t-(O'N'
+h~ Ili1lrx iUJ.:C;4\

Topeka Ks 66612
THIS COMPLAINT IS AGAINST 11THDISTRICT JUDGE LORI BOLTON FLEMING FOR

USURPATION OF OFFICE UNDER K.S.A. 60-1201. K.S.A. 60-1202(1)(2)(4)(5). K.S.A. 601205. K.S.A. 60-1206(a)(b). K.S.A. 60-1207 and for violations of RULES RELATING TO
JUDICIAL CONDUCT CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT Rule 601A.
Irecently signed a grand jury petition that was going around to oust all 11111 judicial district judges due to
try to get the signatures a radio ad was ran on 100.7 ESPN My Town Media which is ownec;Jby attorney Bill
inappropriately as a judge and to usurpJintrude into a private business contract between Summary
servant judge and she then had the nerve to profile the Summary Judgment Group and make slanderous,
that Lori Fleming made typos in her slanderous insulting remarks or the fact that she can't &imply spe\lfue
the investigation and see how many other messages and emails were sent ex parte and about private
matters as well. I have included a copy of the picture going around the 11t1l judicial district which shows Lori
should now have a permanent furlough and decrease about 70% of these government jobs since the public
servants don't want to perform their public job duties. I will be signing a class-action lawsuit now against
Lori Fleming in her private capacity since she was not performing her public ministerial ~yties or job
required voters due to her interferenc~ in a
teejuJUs~tter
and constitutional grand jury petition.
Very truly yours, ~~
z
11
waf--l?/
Thomas Walters 213 E. Carlton PiHsburg Ks 6~762
CC Attorney General's Offlce and State Insurance Commissioner

Sample Complaints Lori Fleming

Cargado por

Información del documento

Derechos de autor

Formatos disponibles

Compartir este documento

Compartir o incrustar documentos

Opciones para compartir

¿Le pareció útil este documento?

¿Este contenido es inapropiado?

Copyright:

Formatos disponibles

Sample Complaints Lori Fleming

Cargado por

Copyright:

Formatos disponibles

-.

120 SW 10111AVE., 2nd Floor

THIS COMPLAINT IS AGAINST 11THDISTRICT JUDGe LORI BOLTON FL~ING FOR

judicial district j4-dges due to

Very truly: yours,

CC Kansas Commission on Judicial Qualifications and State Insurance Commissioner

Office Of The Attorney General

120 SW 10th AVE., 2nd Floor

IS AGAINST 11TH DISTRICT JUDGE LORI BOLTON

OF OFFICE UNDER K.S.A. 60-1201. K5.A. 60-1202(1)(2)-(4)(5}.

1205. K.S.A. 60-1206(a)(b). K.S.A. 60-1207 and for violations of RULESRl:LATING TO

CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

CC Kansas Commission on Judicial Qualific ./ions and State Insurance Commissioner

Office Of The Attomey General

IS AGAINST 11TH DISTRICT JUDGE LORI BOLTON

OF OFFICE UNDER K.S.A. 60-1201. K.S.A. 60-1202(1)(2)(4)(5).

1205, K.S.A. 60-1206(a)(b),

K.S.A. 60-1207 and for violations

CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

Office Of The Attorney General

120 SW 10th AVE., 2nd Floor

IS AGAINST 11TH D1STRICT)UDGE

OF OFFICE UNDER K5.A. 60-1201. K.S.A. 60-1202(1)(2)(4)f5).

K.S.A. 60-1207 and for violations of RULES RELATING TO

CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

Very truf1 yours,

CC Kansas Commission on Judicial Qualifications and State Insurance Commissioner

THIS COMPLAINT ISAGAINST 11TH DISTRICTJUDGE LORI BOLTON FL~ING

Very truly yours,

Kansas Commission on Judicial Qualifications

Kansas Commission on Judici~1 Qualifications

THIS COMPLAINT ISAGAINST 11TH DISTRICTJUDGE LORI BOLTON Ft~{\'lING, KURT

Kansas Commission on Judicial Qualifications

DISTRICT JUDGE LORI BOLTON FL~fvUNG, KURT

LOY, AND CHIEF JUDGE AJ. WACHTER OF CRAWFORD COUNTY

Kansas Commission on Judicial Qualifications

IS AGAINST 11TH DISTRICT JUDGE LORI BOLTON

LOY, AND CHIEF JUDGE A.J. WACHTER OF CRAWFORD

Very truly yours,

Kansas Commission on Judicial Qualifications

IS AGAINST 11TH DISTRICT JUDGE LORI BOLTON FL~ING.

LOY, AND CHIEF JUDGE A.J. WACHTER OF CRAWFORD

Office Of The Attorney General

120 SW 10111AVE., 2nd Floor

CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

CC Kansas Commission on Judicial Qualifications and State Insurance Commissioner

September 15, 2015

THIS COMPLAINT ISAGAINST 11TH DfITft1CT JUDGE LORI BOLTON flEMING

Very truly yours

September ,5, 2015

IS AGAINST 11TH DISTRICT JUDGE LORI BOLTON

September 15, 2015

IS AGAINST 11TH DISTRICT JUDGE LORI BOLTON FlEMlNG

Kansas Commission on Judici~1 Qualifications

THIS COMPLAINT ISAGAINST 11TH DISTRICTJUDGE LORI BOLTON FL~ING

A s'h Jet Pi. oc: \

Kansas Commission on Judicial Qualifications

THIS COMPLAINT IS AGAINST 11TH DISTRtCT JUDGE LORI BOLTON FlEMING

Very truly yours, ~

IS AGAINST lFH DISTRICT JUDGE LORI BOLTON

Kansas Commission on Judicial Qualifications

THIS COMPLAINT ISAGAINST 11TH DISTRICTJUDGE LORI BOLT~{!:.MING

Very truly yours

IS AGAINST 1FH DISTRICT JUDGE LORI BOLTON