Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
Title
Abstract
Introduction
Aims
Theory
Apparatus
Procedure
Results
Calculations
Discussions
Conclusions
Recommendations
Reference
Appendix
Page
2
3
4
5
9
10
11
12
22
24
25
26
27
1.0 ABSTRACT
The experiment was conducted to evaluate and study the overall heat transfer
coefficient, LMTD, heat transfer and heat loss for energy balance and to evaluate and
study the performance of shell and tube heat exchanger at various operating
condition. Heat exchanger is a device that are design to transfer or exchange heat
from one matter to another in efficiently. There are several types of heat exchanger
and one of it that are mostly use in industrial applications is a shell and tube heat
exchanger. Fluids that flow in this device are in counter-current flow where two fluids
flow against each other, maintaining a maximum temperature difference between the
hot and cold streams which allows for maximum heat transfer. We assumed that
internal, potential and kinetic energy was negligible in this process, so Q H must be
equal to QC. In experiment 1, FT1 was constant at 10LPM. The highest efficiency of
heat transfer was 94.07% at FT1=10 and FT2=10. It means that heat transfer occur
efficiently at equal volumetric flowrates of hot and cold water. In experiment 2, FT2
was constant at 10LPM. The highest efficiency of heat transfer was 2062.91% at
FT1=2LPM and FT2=10LPM. In both experiment, the results was different than the
basic theory where the amount of heat release by hot water was not equal to the
amount of heat absorb by cold water, Q H QC due to some errors and the
recommendation and precautions were made to improve this experiment.
2.0 INTRODUCTION
Heat exchanger is a device that are design to transfer or exchange heat from
one matter to another in efficiently. It means that matter that release heat will
decrease in temperature while the other matter that gain heat will increase in
temperature. In the process of transfering heat, the fluid can be liquid such as water
and oil, or can be a moving air. However, this device are not only use for heating
applications, but it is also can be use for cooling application[1].
Heat exchangers can be in cross-flow, parallel-flow or countercurrent. Cross
flow is the flow where the the cold and the hot fluid flow axis is at an angle to each
other. Hence, the fluids will cross each other in this arrangement. Mostly, this type of
flow has the angle between axes as 90 degree[2]. Parallel flow or co-current flow is
the flow where the hot and the cold fluid is flow in the same direction. The most
effective flow in the heat exchanger is a countercurrent flow where the fluid paths
flow in opposite directions, with exiting and the other enters. This results in faster
heat exchange.
Heat exchangers are classified according to transfer process, number of fluids,
degree of surface contact, design features, flow arrangments and heat transfer
mechanism. There are several types of heat exchanger and one of it that are mostly
use in industrial applications is a shell and tube heat exchanger. It consists of large
number of tubes that are packed in a shell with their axes parallel to that of the
shell[3]. Heat transfer occur as one fluid flows through the tubes while the other flows
outside the tubes through the shell.
Each of device must have advantages and disadvantages, so do this shell and
tube heat exchanger. Some of its advantages are it can be use in a system with
higher temperatures and pressures and have less pressure drop acoss a tube cooler.
There is substantial flexibility regarding materials of construction to accommodate
corrosion and other concerns. The shell and the tubes can be made of different
materials. Disadvantages for this type of device are heat transfer efficiency is less
compared to plate type cooler, cleaning and maintainance is difficult since a tube
cooler requires enough clearance at one end to remove the tube nest and capacity of
tube cooler is limited[4].
3.0 OBJECTIVES
1) To evaluate and study the overall heat transfer coefficient, LMTD, heat transfer
and heat loss for energy balance.
2) To evaluate and study the performance of shell and tube heat exchanger at
various operating condition.
3) To study the working principle of counter flow heat exchanger.
4) To study the function and the working of shell and tube heat exchanger.
5) To study the effect of fluid flow rated on heat exchanger performance.
4.0 THEORY
4
Figure 5 : Parallel and counter flow in Shell & Tube Heat Exchanger
The way that a heat exchanger works is hot water and cold water enter the
exchanger, where the process of cold water gaining some heat and the hot water
losing some takes place, before they both exit the exchanger. What is actually
happening is, the hot water is heating either the inside or the outside of the tubes in
the exchanger, depending on where it is flowing, by what is known as convection.
Then the heat is conducted through the tubes to the other side, either the
outside or the inside, where it is then convection back into the cold water raising its
temperature. Convection is a mode of heat transfer that involves motion of some fluid
that either absorbs heat from a source or gives heat to some surrounding.
For a heat exchanger that flows parallel or countercurrent then the coefficient
of heat transfer is called the overall coefficient of heat transfer. It is calculated using
the log mean temperature difference, which is found two different ways, depending
on whether the flow is parallel or counter. A heat exchanger is a device by which
thermal energy is transferred from one fluid to another. The types of heat exchangers
to be tested in this experiment is counter-flow cheat exchanger.
Heat exchangers transfer heat from one working fluid to another. For instance,
steam generators, feed water heaters, re heaters and condensers are all examples of
heat exchangers found in nuclear power systems. The important quantity in heat
exchanger analysis is the total rate of heat transfer between the hot and cold fluid.
Several different expressions for this heat transfer rate can be developed, relating the
heat transfer rate to quantities such as the inlet and outlet fluid temperatures and the
overall heat transfer coefficient. When these expressions are developed, care must
be taken to ensure that the appropriate mean temperature expressions are used.
Several assumptions can be made to simplify these expressions.
We assume negligible heat transfer between the system and its surroundings,
negligible potential or kinetic energy changes, constant specific heats, and that the
fluids are not undergoing any phase change. The basic theory in this experiment is
QH = QC, which the amount of heat transfer is equal to the amount of heat absorb. In
this case, the heat transfer rate across a heat exchanger is usually expressed in the
form Q = mCp T.
Where:
QH = Heat load for hot water flow rate
QC= Heat load for cold water flow rate
mH=Hot water mass flow rate
mC=Cold water mass flow rate
t1=Hot water inlet temperature
t2=Hot water outlet temperature
T1=Cold water inlet temperature
T2=Cold water outlet temperature
LMTD
Calculations of log mean temperature difference (LMTD).
LMTD
(t1 T 2) (t 2 T1 )
(t T2 )
ln 1
(t 2 T1 )
QH - QC
Dirt factor, Q =
0.5 (QH + QC )
UD
equation below. In this case, the value of total heat transfer area
Q
A LMTD
Where:
Q
Heat rate with respect to the average head load
5.0 APPARATUS
6.0 PROCEDURE
6.1 General Start-up Procedures
A quick inspection was performed to make sure that the equipment is in a
proper working condition. Initially, all valves were surely closed, except V1 and V12.
Hot water tank was filled up via a water supply hose connected to valve V27. The
valve was closed once the tank was full. The cold water tank was filled up by opening
valve V28 and the valve had been leaved in opened condition for continuous water
supply. A drain hose was connected to the cold water drain point. The main power
and the heater for the hot water tank were switch on and the temperature controller
was set to 500C.
6.2 Experiment Counter-Current Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger
The general start-up procedure was performed. The valves were switched to
counter-current shell and tube heat exchanger arrangement. Pumps P1 and P2 were
switched on. Valves V3 and V14 were open and adjusted to obtain the desired
flowrates for hot water and cold water streams. The system was allowed to reach
steady state for 10 minutes. FT1, FT2, TT1, TT2, TT3 and TT4 were recorded.
Pressure drop measurements for shell-side and tube-side were recorded
for
10
7.0 RESULTS
Experiment 1
Table 1: Counter-current Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger at constant FT1
FT 1
FT 2
TT 1
TT 2
TT 3
TT 4
DPT 1
DPT 2
(LPM)
(LPM)
(0C)
(0C)
(0C)
(0C)
(mmH2O)
(mmH2O)
10
43.6
29.2
47.8
49.6
100
11
10
38.9
29.1
46.5
49.5
100
10
35.4
28.5
45.5
48.9
100
57
10
34.3
28.6
44.7
48.4
101
119
10
10
33.4
29.0
44.6
48.7
100
227
Experiment 2
Table 2: Counter-current and Tube Heat Exchanger at constant FT2
FT 1
FT 2
TT 1
TT 2
TT 3
TT 4
DPT 1
DPT 1
(LPM)
(LPM)
(0C)
(0C)
(0C)
(0C)
(mmH2O)
(mmH2O)
10
31.2
28.9
39.1
48.5
197
10
31.8
28.8
43.3
49.0
197
10
32.6
29.1
44.0
49.4
27
197
10
33.2
29.3
43.8
48.2
49
198
10
10
38.7
29.3
44.8
49.0
82
197
11
8.0 CALCULATIONS
Experiment 1 : at constant FT 1
(i)
At FT1=10 LPM, FT2=2 LPM
Heat transfer for hot water, QH = mHCpT
3
L
1 min
1m
QH
= 10.0 min x 1000 L x 60 s
kg
x 988.18 m3
x 4175
J
kg .C
x 4183
J
kg .C
(43.6 29.2) 0C
= 9901.56 W
Qc
QC
L
min x
= 2.0
1 m3
1000 L
= mc Cp T
1 min
60 s
kg
x 995.67 m3
(49.6 47.8) 0C
= 249.89 W
= 9901.56 W 249.89 W
= 9651.67 W
T1 - t2)
LMTD, TLM
(T2 - t1)
=
ln
(T1 - t2) - (T2 - t1)
47.8 - 29.2)
(49.6 - 43.6)
=
ln
(47.8 - 29.2) - (49.6 - 43.6)
= 11.14
Dirt Factor, Q
= 0.5 (QH+QC)
12
Q
A LMTD
5075.73
0.0375 11.14
= 12150.16 kg/s2
Efficiency
QC
x 100
QH
= (249.89/9901.56) x 100%
= 2.52%
(ii)
At FT1=10 LPM, FT2=4 LPM
Heat transfer for hot water, QH = mHCpT
L
1 min
1 m3
QH
= 10.0 min x 1000 L x 60 s
kg
x 988.18 m3
x 4175
J
kg .C
x 4183
J
kg .C
(38.9 29.1) 0C
= 6738.56 W
Qc
QC
= 4.0
L
min x
1m
1000 L
= mc Cp T
1 min
60 s
kg
x 995.67 m3
(49.5 46.5) 0C
= 832.98 W
= 6738.56 W 832.98 W
= 5905.58 W
T1 - t2)
LMTD, TLM
(T2 - t1)
=
ln
(T1 - t2) - (T2 - t1)
13
46.529.1 )
(49.5 - 38.9)
=
ln
(46.5 - 29.1) - (49.5 - 38.9)
= 13.72
Dirt Factor, Q
= 0.5 (QH+QC)
= 0.5 (6738.56 + 832.98 )
= 3785.77 W
Q
A LMTD
3785.77
0.0375 13.72
= 7358.15 kg/s2
Efficiency
QC
x 100
QH
= (832.98/6738.56) x 100%
= 12.36%
(iii)
At FT1=10 LPM, FT2=6 LPM
Heat transfer for hot water, QH = mHCpT
L
1 min
1 m3
QH
= 10.0 min x 1000 L x 60 s
kg
x 988.18 m3
x 4175
J
kg .C
x 4183
J
kg .C
(35.4 28.5) 0C
= 4744.50 W
Qc
QC
= 6.0
L
min x
1 m3
1000 L
= mc Cp T
1 min
60 s
kg
x 995.67 m3
(48.9 45.5) 0C
14
= 1416.06 W
= 4744.50 W 1416.06 W
= 3328.44 W
T1 - t2)
LMTD, TLM
(T2 - t1)
=
ln
(T1 - t2) - (T2 - t1)
45.5 - 28.5)
(48.9 - 35.4)
=
ln
(45.5 - 28.5) - (48.9 - 35.4)
= 15.18
Dirt Factor, Q
= 0.5 (QH+QC)
= 0.5 (4744.50 + 1416.06 )
= 3080.28 W
Q
A LMTD
3080.28
0.0375 15.18
= 5411.12 kg/s2
Efficiency
QC
x 100
QH
= (1416.06/4744.50) x 100%
= 29.85%
(iv)
kg
x 988.18 m3
x 4175
J
kg .C
x 4183
J
kg .C
(34.3 28.6) 0C
= 3919.37 W
Qc
QC
L
min x
= 8.0
1 m3
1000 L
= mc Cp T
1 min
60 s
kg
x 995.67 m3
(48.4 44.7) 0C
= 2054.68 W
= 3919.37 W 2054.68 W
= 1864.69 W
T1 - t2)
LMTD, TLM
(T2 - t1)
=
ln
(T1 - t2) - (T2 - t1)
44.7 - 28.6)
(48.4 - 34.3)
=
ln
(44.7 - 28.6) - (48.4 - 34.3)
= 15.08
Dirt Factor, Q
= 0.5 (QH+QC)
= 0.5 (3919.37 + 2054.68 )
= 2987.03 W
16
Q
A LMTD
2987.03
0.0375 15.08
= 5282.10 kg/s2
Efficiency
QC
x 100
QH
= (2054.68/3919.37) x 100%
= 52.42%
(v)
At FT1=10 LPM, FT2=10 LPM
Heat transfer for hot water, QH = mHCpT
L
1 min
1 m3
QH
= 10.0 min x 1000 L x 60 s
kg
x 988.18 m3
x 4175
J
kg .C
x 4183
J
kg .C
(33.4 29.0) 0C
= 3025.48 W
Qc
QC
= 10.0
L
min x
1 m3
1000 L
= mc Cp T
1 min
60 s
kg
x 995.67 m3
(48.7 44.6) 0C
= 2846.01 W
= 3025.48 W 2846.01 W
= 179.47 W
T1 - t2)
LMTD, TLM
(T2 - t1)
=
ln
(T1 - t2) - (T2 - t1)
17
44.6 - 29.0)
(48.7 - 33.4)
=
ln
(44.6 - 29.0) - (48.7 - 33.4)
= 15.45
Dirt Factor, Q
= 0.5 (QH+QC)
= 0.5 (3025.48 + 2846.01 )
= 2935.75 W
Q
A LMTD
2935.75
0.0375 15.45
= 5067.10 kg/s2
Efficiency
QC
x 100
QH
= (2846.01/3025.48) x 100%
= 94.07%
18
Experiment 2: at constant FT 2
(i)
At FT1=2 LPM, FT2=10 LPM
Heat transfer for hot water, QH = mHCpT
3
L
1 min
1m
QH
= 2.0 min x 1000 L x 60 s
kg
x 988.18 m3
x 4175
J
kg .C
x 4183
J
kg .C
(31.2 28.9) 0C
= 316.30 W
Qc
QC
L
min x
= 10.0
1 m3
1000 L
= mc Cp T
1 min
60 s
kg
x 995.67 m3
(48.5 39.1) 0C
= 6524.99 W
= 316.30 W 6524.99 W
= -6208.69 W
T1 - t2)
LMTD, TLM
(T2 - t1)
=
ln
(T1 - t2) - (T2 - t1)
39.1 - 28.9)
(48.5 - 31.2 )
=
ln
(39.1 - 28.9) - (48.5 - 31.2)
= 13.44
Dirt Factor, Q
= 0.5 (QH+QC)
= 0.5 (316.30 + 6524.99 )
19
= 3420.65 W
Q
A LMTD
3420.65
0.0375 13.44
= 6787.00 kg/s2
Efficiency
QC
x 100
QH
= (6524.99/316.30) x 100%
= 2062.91%
(ii)
At FT1=4 LPM, FT2=10 LPM
Heat transfer for hot water, QH = mHCpT
L
1 min
1 m3
QH
= 4.0 min x 1000 L x 60 s
kg
x 988.18 m3
x 4175
J
kg .C
x 4183
J
kg .C
(31.8 28.8) 0C
= 825.13 W
Qc
QC
= 10.0
L
min x
1 m3
1000 L
= mc Cp T
1 min
60 s
kg
x 995.67 m3
(49.0 43.3) 0C
= 3956.64 W
= 825.13 W 3956.64 W
= -3131.51 W
T1 - t2)
LMTD, TLM
(T2 - t1)
=
ln
(T1 - t2) - (T2 - t1)
20
43.3 - 28.8)
(49.0 - 31.8 )
=
ln
(43.3 - 28.8) - (49.0 - 31.8)
= 15.81
Dirt Factor, Q
= 0.5 (QH+QC)
= 0.5 (825.13 + 3956.64 )
= 2390.89 W
Q
A LMTD
2390.89
0.0375 15.81
= 4032.71 kg/s2
Efficiency
QC
x 100
QH
= (3956.64/825.13) x 100%
= 479.52%
(iii)
At FT1=6 LPM, FT2=10 LPM
Heat transfer for hot water, QH = mHCpT
L
1 min
1 m3
QH
= 6.0 min x 1000 L x 60 s
kg
x 988.18 m3
x 4175
J
kg .C
x 4183
J
kg .C
(32.6 29.1) 0C
= 1443.98 W
QC
= 10.0
L
min x
1 m3
1000 L
Qc
= mc Cp T
1 min
60 s
kg
x 995.67 m3
(49.4 44.0) 0C
21
= 3748.40 W
= 1443.98 W 3748.40 W
= -2304.42 W
T1 - t2)
LMTD, TLM
(T2 - t1)
=
ln
(T1 - t2) - (T2 - t1)
44.0 - 29.1 )
(49.4 - 32.6 )
=
ln
(44.0 - 29.1) - (49.4 - 32.6 )
= 15.83
Dirt Factor, Q
= 0.5 (QH+QC)
= 0.5 (1443.98 + 3748.40 )
= 2596.19 W
Q
A LMTD
2596.19
0.0375 15.83
= 4373.45 kg/s2
Efficiency
QC
x 100
QH
= (3748.40/1443.98) x 100%
= 259.59%
22
(iv)
At FT1=8 LPM, FT2=10 LPM
Heat transfer for hot water, QH = mHCpT
L
1 min
1 m3
QH
= 8.0 min x 1000 L x 60 s
kg
x 988.18 m3
x 4175
J
kg .C
x 4183
J
kg .C
(33.2 29.3 ) 0C
= 2145.34 W
Qc
QC
L
min x
= 10.0
1m
1000 L
= mc Cp T
1 min
60 s
kg
x 995.67 m3
(48.2 43.8) 0C
= 3054.25 W
= 2145.34 W 3054.25 W
= -908.91 W
T1 - t2)
LMTD, TLM
(T2 - t1)
=
ln
(T1 - t2) - (T2 - t1)
43.8 - 29.3 )
(48.2 - 33.2 )
=
ln
(43.8 - 29.3) - (48.2 - 33.2)
= 14.75
Dirt Factor, Q
= 0.5 (QH+QC)
= 0.5 (2145.34 + 3054.25 )
= 2599.80 W
23
Q
A LMTD
2599.80
0.0375 14.75
= 4700.20 kg/s2
Efficiency
QC
x 100
QH
= (3054.25/2145.34) x 100%
= 142.37%
24
(v)
At FT1=10 LPM, FT2=10 LPM
Heat transfer for hot water, QH = mHCpT
L
1 min
1 m3
QH
= 10.0 min x 1000 L x 60 s
kg
x 988.18 m3
x 4175
J
kg .C
x 4183
J
kg .C
(38.7 29.3) 0C
= 6463.52 W
Qc
QC
L
min x
= 10.0
1m
1000 L
= mc Cp T
1 min
60 s
kg
x 995.67 m3
(49.0 44.8) 0C
= 2915.42 W
= 6463.52 W 2915.42 W
= 3548.10 W
T1 - t2)
LMTD, TLM
(T2 - t1)
=
ln
(T1 - t2) - (T2 - t1)
44.8 - 29.3 )
(49.0 - 38.7 )
=
ln
(44.8 - 29.3) - (49.0 - 38.7 )
= 12.72
Dirt Factor, Q
= 0.5 (QH+QC)
= 0.5 (6463.52 + 2915.42 )
= 4689.47 W
25
Q
A LMTD
4689.47
0.0375 12.72
= 9831.17 kg/s2
Efficiency
QC
x 100
QH
= (2915.42/6463.52) x 100%
= 45.11%
26
9.0 DISCUSSIONS
28
10.0 CONCLUSION
The main objectives of this experiment is to evaluate and study the overall
heat transfer coefficient, LMTD, heat transfer and heat loss for energy balance as
well as to evaluate and study the performance of shell and tube heat exchanger at
various operating condition. In this shell and tube heat exchanger, the fluids flow in
counter-current flow which results in faster heat exchange. The basic theory in this
air experiment is QH=QC, which the amount of heat release by hot water is equal to
the amount of heat absorb by cold water. However, the results is different than the
basic theory where the amount of heat release by hot water is not equal to the
amount of heat absorb by cold water, Q H QC. This is due to some errors during
conducting this experiment which are the presence of bubbles in tube where the hot
water flows. The presence of this bubbles can cause corrosion and disturb the
process of heat transfer. Although the results are not follow the basic theory, this
experiment can be said as successful as the objectives of this experiment is already
achieve.
29
11.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
30
12.0 REFFERENCE
[1]
http://www.lytron.com/Tools-and-Technical-Reference/Application-
Notes/What-is-a-Heat-Exchanger
[2]
(retrieved on 5/10/2015)
http://www.thomasnet.com/articles/process-equipment/heat-exchanger-types
(retrieved on 5/10/2015)
[3]
Kessler, D.P., Greenkorn, R.A. (1999). Momentum, Heat, and Mass Transfer
[4]
http://www.ejbowman.co.uk/products/ShellandTubeHeatExchangers.html
(retrieved on 5/10/2015)
[5]
http://www.alfalaval.com/about-us/our-company/key-technologies/heat-
transfer/shell-and-tube-heat-exchangers/pages/shell-and-tube-heat-exchanger.aspx
(retrieved on 5/10/2015)
31