Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
A R T I C L E I N F O
A B S T R A C T
Article history:
Received 23 July 2010
Accepted 2 September 2010
Energy plays signicant role in the development of a nation. The conventional sources, though
exhausting and not environment friendly are being increasingly used. Looking at limited supplies and
various environment problems associated with its uses, renewable energy sources are getting attention.
Municipal solid waste [MSW] is getting importance in recent years. Having fewer disposal problems is
being considered as valuable bio-energy resources. The MSW management involves collection,
transportation, handling and conversion to energy by biological and thermal routes.
The present paper reports the results of physical, proximate and TGA/DTA analysis, used to select the
most appropriate method of energy conversion. Based on the energy potential available, the feasibility of
energy conversion through biogas production using available waste has been carried out. The CDM benets
have also been considered. The cost of generation with and without CDM benets is Rs. 1.36/- and Rs. 1.41/per kWh respectively as compared to cost of energy from grid [Rs. 3.50/- per kWh]. Therefore power
generation from MSW of Haridwar city using biomethanation conversion technology is feasible.
2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Municipal solid waste
Carbon credits
Feasibility study
Power generation
Contents
1.
2.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
70
70
71
72
72
74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
76
77
77
77
77
77
77
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
70
S. Jain, M.P. Sharma / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011) 6990
2.2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
78
78
78
78
78
78
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
81
81
81
82
82
83
83
83
84
84
84
85
85
85
86
86
86
86
86
87
87
87
87
87
88
90
90
90
[()TD$FIG]
S. Jain, M.P. Sharma / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011) 6990
71
[()TD$FIG]
countries like USA, UK, etc. The energy consumption pattern shows
that 3% of the total energy is met by biomass by world while 97% by
fossil and conventional energy resulting in the overall natural
calamities and competition for energy [2]. Likewise, the developed
countries meet their 99% energy needs from fossil and conventional energy and 1% from biomass resources. This indicates that
developed countries, being rich, has high per capita energy
consumption [e.g. USA 8000 kWh/year] and is responsible for
causing major environmental consequences. On the other hand,
the developing countries do not have purchasing power and do not
have enough money to purchase costly fuels and therefore are
forced to draw 43% of their energy from biomass available freely.
As a result, the per capita energy consumption in developing
countries is low [India: 150 kWh/year] [Annual report, MNRE
[20082009]. The reasons for low per capita energy consumption
in developing countries may be attributed to low income and low
purchasing power and tendency to get the fuel free of cost. This led
[()TD$FIG]
Table 1
Country wise oil reserve (billion barrels) [3].
Country
Oil reserves
Saudi Arabia
Canada
Iran
Iraq
Kuwait
UAE
Venezuela
Russia
Libya
Nigeria
United States
China
Qatar
Mexico
Algeria
Brazil
Kazakhstan
Norway
Azerbaijan
India
Rest of World
World Total
264.3
178.8
132.5
115.0
101.5
97.8
79.7
60.0
39.1
35.9
21.4
18.3
15.2
12.9
11.4
11.2
9.0
7.7
7.0
5.8
68.1
1,292.5
S. Jain, M.P. Sharma / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011) 6990
72
Table 2
World natural gas reserves by country [3].
Table 4
Life of fossil fuels (years) [4].
Country
Reserves (trillion
cubic feet)
Percent of
world total
World
Russia
Iran
Qatar
Saudi Arabia
United Arab Emirates
United States
Nigeria
Algeria
Venezuela
Iraq
Indonesia
Norway
Malaysia
Turkmenistan
Uzbekistan
Kazakhstan
Netherlands
Egypt
Canada
Kuwait
Rest of World
6112
1680
971
911
241
214
193
185
161
151
112
98
84
75
71
66
65
62
59
57
56
602
100.0
27.5
15.9
14.9
3.9
3.5
3.1
3.0
2.6
2.5
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.1
1.0
1.0
0.9
0.9
9.8
Table 3
World recoverable coal reserves (billion tonne) [3].
Region/Country
Bituminous
and anthracite
Sub
bituminous
Lignite
Total
World Total
United States
Russia
China
India
Other Non-OECD
Europe and Eurasia
Australia and New Zealand
Africa
OECD Europe
Other Non-OECD Asia
Brazil
Other Central and
South America
Canada
Others
530.4
125.4
54.1
68.6
99.3
50.1
297.0
109.3
107.4
37.1
0.0
18.7
173.4
36.0
11.5
20.5
2.6
31.3
1,000.9
270.7
173.1
126.2
101.9
100.1
42.6
55.3
19.5
1.4
0.0
8.5
2.7
0.2
0.2
2.0
2.0
2.2
41.9
18.8
8.1
0.0
0.1
87.2
55.5
43.3
11.5
11.1
10.8
3.8
1.8
1.0
0.4
2.5
0.1
7.3
2.3
Fossil fuels
Coal
Oil
Natural gas
210
42
60
and productive systems. The limited supply, increasing consumption and environmental consequence of the utilization of fossil fuel
has initiated the search for alternative renewable energy sources.
1.3. Renewable energy
Since the renewable can be produced in a decentralized
manner, it can help to overcome the problems of distribution
associated with conventional sources of energy, especially, in
remote rural areas.
Renewable energy sources include both direct solar radiation
by collectors [e.g. solar and at-plat thermal cells] and indirect
solar energy such as wind, hydropower, ocean energy and biomass
resources that can be managed in a sustainable manner.
Traditional methods of using biomass and derivatives such as
wood and charcoal are highly inefcient, in contrast with modern
techniques emphasing proper forest management sustained-yield
fuel wood plantations and efcient production.
If broadly interpreted, the denition of renewable resources
also includes the chemical energy stored in food and non-fuel plant
products. From an operational viewpoint, the correct way to treat
renewable energy is as measure to reduce the demand for
conventional energy forms.
1.3.1. Renewable energy sources
1.3.1.1. Small hydro power. Small hydro installations were cheaper
to run but expansive to build expansive to build. The concept is
changing now with smaller, lighter and high-speed turbine
equipment, low cost electronic speed and load control systems
and inexpensive plastic penstock. Capital investment in SHP is still
higher than in diesel generating system of comparable capacity
have the long life and low operating costs which make it an
attractive option for many applications. Small hydroelectric
system provides clean, cheap electricity for local applications.
Small-scale system captures the energy of owing water and
converts it to electricity. Although the potential of small
hydroelectric system depends on the availability of water ow,
where the resource exists it can provide cheap, clean, reliable
electricity. Small hydropower, [up to 25 MW] with its multiple
advantage as a decentralized, low cost and reliable form of energy,
is getting the top priority in several countries including India in
order to achieve energy self sufciency.
Small hydro power is attracting great deal of attention as ecofriendly renewable energy source and offers many advantages
including major social ones. It is available dispersed in remote
areas away from the main centre of population and so it is the
convenient source for giving electricity benets to the isolated
small communities. India has power potential of 15,000 MW [5]
and the country has achieved 1694 MW [5] of power generated up
to December 2004.
Micro-hydro power [MHP], the small-scale power generation,
has been getting new llip in recent years as it can play a key role in
the development of rural areas, especially hilly areas. Micro-hydro
scheme can provide power for industrial, agricultural and domestic
uses in the form of mechanical or electricity. For hilly or remote
areas, where the grid supply is not available, it becomes desirable
to develop much low capacity stations.
S. Jain, M.P. Sharma / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011) 6990
Table 5
Wind resources as per wind speed [8].
SN.
Indicated value of
wind resources
1
2
3
4
<4.5 m/s
4.55.4 m/s
5.46.7 m/s
>6.7 m/s
Poor
Marginal
Good to very good
Exceptional
73
74
S. Jain, M.P. Sharma / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011) 6990
Table 6
Tidal power plants in India [10].
SN.
Name of site
1
2
3
Gulf of Combay
Gulf of Kutch
Ganga dalta of Sunderbans
11
8
5
6.77
5.23
2.77
7000
1200
100
[()TD$FIG]
S. Jain, M.P. Sharma / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011) 6990
75
S. Jain, M.P. Sharma / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011) 6990
76
Table 7
MSW generated by different cities per day per capita [16].
Name of city
Area (km2)
Waste generated/capita/day
Kavaratti
Gangtok
Itanagar
Daman
Silvasa
Panjim
Kohima
Port Blair
Shillong
Shimla
Agartala
Gandhinagar
Dhanbad
Pondicherry
Imphal
Aizwal
Jammu
Dehradun
Asansol
Kochi
Raipur
Bhubaneshwer
Thiruvanantapuram
Chandigarh
Guwahati
Ranchi
Vijayawada
Srinagar
Nmadurai
Coimbatore
Jabalpur
Amritsar
Rajkot
Allahabad
Visakhapatnam
Faridabad
Meerut
Nashik
Varanasi
Jamshedpur
Agra
Vadodara
Patna
Ludhiana
Bhopal
Indore
Nagpur
Lucknow
Jaipur
Surat
Pune
Kanpur
Ahmedabad
Hyderabad
Bangalore
Chennai
Kolkata
Delhi
Greater Mumbai
10,119
29,354
35,022
35,770
50,463
59,066
77,030
99,984
132,867
142,555
189,998
195,985
199,258
220,865
221,492
228,280
369,959
426,674
475,439
595,575
605,747
648,032
744,983
808,515
809,895
847,093
851,282
898,440
928,868
930,882
932,484
966,862
967,476
975,393
982,904
1,055,938
1,068,772
1,077,236
1,091,918
1,104,713
1,275,135
1,306,227
1,366,444
1,398,467
1,437,354
1,474,968
2,052,066
2,185,927
2,322,575
2,433,835
2,538,473
2,551,337
3,520,085
3,843,585
4,302,326
4,343,645
4,572,876
10,306,452
11,978,450
4
15
22
7
17
69
30
18
10
20
63
57
24
19
34
117
102
67
127
98
56
1354
142
114
218
224
58
341
52
107
134
77
105
71
110
216
142
269
80
64
140
240
107
159
286
130
218
310
518
112
244
267
191
169
226
174
187
1483
437
3
13
12
15
16
32
13
76
45
39
77
44
77
130
43
57
215
131
207
400
184
234
171
326
166
208
374
428
275
530
216
438
207
509
584
448
490
200
425
338
654
357
511
735
574
557
504
475
904
1000
1175
1100
1302
2187
1669
3036
2653
5922
5320
0.3
0.44
0.34
0.42
0.32
0.54
0.17
0.76
0.34
0.27
0.4
0.22
0.39
0.59
0.19
0.25
0.58
0.31
0.44
0.67
0.3
0.36
0.23
0.4
0.2
0.25
0.44
0.48
0.3
0.57
0.23
0.45
0.21
0.52
0.59
0.42
0.46
0.19
0.39
0.31
0.51
0.27
0.37
0.53
0.4
0.38
0.25
0.22
0.39
0.41
0.46
0.43
0.37
0.57
0.39
0.62
0.58
0.57
0.45
S. Jain, M.P. Sharma / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011) 6990
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Thermacoal
Silt/ash/sand
Clothes
Boulders/stones
Leather
77
78
S. Jain, M.P. Sharma / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011) 6990
prepared for assisting the NBB in nalizing the nancial institutions and the funding mechanism for the shelf of viable projects.
Private funding strategies are developed, giving special
emphasis on the methodological operations like, design-builtoperate [DBO], design-built-own-operate [DBOO], built-ownoperate [BOO] and built-own-lease-transfer [BOLT]. The funding
strategies will be evolved taking into account the requirements of
the technology, legal and regulatory aspects of the country.
2.1.9. Study of Government infrastructure and suggest changes:
Various policy, legal, regulatory and institutional mechanisms
that are in place have been reviewed and the measures to be taken
to establish rm linkages between pollution control requirements,
waste-to-energy generation, funding, implementation and operation of waste-to-energy projects; as also the role of and
interactions among key players like the central and state
government, regulatory authorities, local bodies, industries and
nancial institutions have been identied.
2.2. National master plan
1
2
3
Type of project
Waste to power
Waste to fuel
Fuel to power
Industrial
waste
2.00
0.05
1.00
1.50
0.50
1.00
[()TD$FIG]
S. Jain, M.P. Sharma / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011) 6990
79
Fig. 5. 4800 cum Biogas per day biomethanation plant based on starch industry
liquid waste by M/s. Anil products Ltd., Ahmedabad, Gujarat [19].
Table 9
Fiscal incentives available for biomass power generation.
SN.
Item
Income tax
Depreciation
Tax holiday
Customs duty
3
4
Description
100% depreciation in the rst year can be claimed for the following power generation equipment
1
Fluidized bed boilers
2
Back pressure, pass-out, controlled extraction, extraction and condensing turbine for Power generation with boilers
3
High efciency boilers
4
Waste heat recovery equipment
10 year tax holiday
Duty leviable for NRSE power projects of less than 50 MW capacity (under Project Import Category) is 20%. This covers
machinery and equipment components required for generation of electric power.
Exempted for renewable energy devices, including raw materials, components and assemblies.
Exemption is available in certain states.
Table 10
An overview of state government/utility policies and incentives for energy from waste power generation [20].
SN.
Item
Description
1
2
3
4
5
80
S. Jain, M.P. Sharma / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011) 6990
Fig. 6. 5 MW power and 75 tonne per day biofertilizer from municipal solid waste of
Lucknow city, by M/s Asia Bio-energy India Ltd., Chennai.
S. Jain, M.P. Sharma / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011) 6990
3. Population growth
4. Increasing presence of substances in the municipal waste
stream which are difcult to degrade/breakdown.
5. Increasing industrial activities
6. Poor public participation in nding solutions.
7. Lack of recognition of solid waste as a problem demanding
attention and action by the regulatory agencies.
Solid waste from municipal, hospital and industries is a
problem that needs serious attention. The issues involved are
diverse. For some wastes the non availability of space for
disposal is the main problem. For other waste the problem is one
of the improper disposals. The effect of the later may range
from simple aesthetic consequences to one of safety and health
issues involving human/biological and ecological risk. The
magnitude of the problem in present is not huge, though the
deteriorating situation is all too common to observe. Thus
argent attention needs to be given to this problem in Haridwar
city [India].
3.1. Objective of the project
The objective of the study is to analyze the MSW of Haridwar
city chemically and suggest a energy conversion technology for
managing that waste and to generate power from the waste in an
efcient way and to prepare a feasibility report for power
generation from the MSW of Haridwar city.
3.1.1. Amount of waste generated
The city generates, on an average, about 190MT of MSW per
day. The major sources of MSW generation of the city are domestic,
shops and commercial establishments, hotels, restaurants, dharamsalas and fruit and vegetable markets. Number of registered
hotels, restaurants and dharamsalas in the city are 270, 250 and
280 respectively. In addition there are 3 fruit and vegetable
markets. Quantity of waste generated from various sources are
presented in Table 11 [21].
81
Table 11
Solid waste generated from different sources (Tonne/day) [21].
SN.
Source
Generation
1
2
3
4
5
6
Total
Domestic
Fruit and vegetable markets
Shop and commercial establishments
Hotel, restaurants and dharamsalas
Construction/demolition activities
Other
155
5
12
4
2
12
190
Table 12
Vehicle presently being utilized by HNNP for transportation of MSW.
SN.
Type of vehicle
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Tractor trolley
Container carrier tractor
Tipper truck
Mechanical loader
Dumper placer
Refuse compactor
Vikram three wheeler
6
3
5
2
2
1
6
[()TD$FIG]
Fig. 7. Map of Haridwar district showing MSW dumping site of Haridwar city [22].
[()TD$FIG]
82
S. Jain, M.P. Sharma / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011) 6990
[()TD$FIG]
Fig. 10. Municipal vehicles dumping MSW to the dumping site at Haridwar
[Chandighat].
[()TD$FIG]
S. Jain, M.P. Sharma / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011) 6990
83
GL: glass
PL: plastic
TH: thermacoal
CL: clothes
SL: silt/boulders/clay
Table 13
Composition of MSW of Haridwar city.
S.N
Composition
Biodegradable
Sample
YW
VEG
Non-biodegradable
PW
CL
GL
PL
1.15
1
1.6
1.6
Total (%)
100
83.6
16.4
33.5
28
100
86.8
13.2
100
85.7
14.3
100
88.7
11.3
TH
SL
CL
6.5
6.5
.6
.4
26
20
1.2
1
2.6
2.6
4.8
4.8
1.8
1.5
AR
DB
25.2
21.5
28.5
23.6
9.2
8
AR
DB
30.2
27.5
12.6
9.2
14.5
13.2
AR
DB
28.6
25.2
29.5
24.8
10.2
8.7
1.7
.15
.2
.2
7.8
7.8
22
17.5
.5
.5
5.8
5.8
34
29.5
1.1
1.1
35.4
30.5
100
89.2
10.8
2.8
2.8
42.9
38
100
87.3
12.7
AR
DB
21.5
18.6
28.2
26.2
8.5
6.8
.6
.5
AR
DB
30.4
28
24.2
22.8
7.8
5.9
1.1
.9
AR
DB
31.5
29.2
12.8
10.2
9.2
6.3
.8
.8
AR
DB
17.5
15.8
28.6
25.5
9.8
6.7
1.8
1.6
AR
DB
24.5
20.4
30.2
17.8
4.8
2.9
.7
.6
.8
.6
AR
DB
20.5
18.5
17.8
15.2
4.2
3.1
2.7
2.7
10
AR
DB
31.7
19.2
14.8
12.3
4.7
3.8
.2
.2
AR
DB
31.8
30.2
12.5
9.8
8.2
6.9
1.1
.95
AR
DB
34.5
32.4
21.5
18.3
9.7
7.4
1
.8
11
12
.9
.9
.9
.8
41.1
37.2
.4
.3
100
87.8
12.2
4
4
35
30.2
.8
.6
100
76.5
23.5
1.7
1.7
53.1
47.2
100
88.4
11.6
47.2
40.8
100
77.4
22.6
100
88.9
11.1
100
88.6
11.4
1.4
1.1
1
1
42.4
37.5
4.8
4.8
27.6
24
3
2.55
[()TD$FIG]
S. Jain, M.P. Sharma / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011) 6990
84
Table 14
Energy contents of MSW samples (as received basis and dry basis).
SN
Sample
Caloric value
of biodegradable
material in MSW
only (KJ/kg)
Caloric value
of whole
MSW (KJ/kg)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
17,770
17,130
13,928
14,888
17,290
14,568
17,130
13,447
16,169
16,809
16,809
16,649
10,726
7524
6403
8805
8805
8645
8645
8164
8965
8004
7204
6723
Average
16,049
8217
[()TD$FIG]
Calorfic
Value(kcal/kg)
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
10
20
30
40
[()TD$FIG]
SN.
Sample
Moisture (%)
VM (%)
Ash (%)
FC (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Average
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
19.4
18.2
22.3
18.3
14.8
21.7
16.2
32.5
18.6
28.6
18.1
18.4
20.5
17.1
15.9
31.2
26.1
24.6
20.5
15.7
16.7
18.5
7.5
18.9
36.8
21
39.5
45.9
28.5
38.6
37.6
42.8
48.1
36.8
50.9
48.9
46
31.8
41.2
24
20
18
17
23
15
20
14
12
15
17
13
17.3
Calorific Value(kcal/kg)
Table 15
Result of proximate analysis (as received basis).
4500
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
0
Moisture Content(%)
Fig. 14. Relationship between caloric value and moisture content.
10
[()TD$FIG]
S. Jain, M.P. Sharma / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011) 6990
Calorific
Value(kcal/kg)
5000
Table 17
Showing percentage weight loss with temperature.
SN.
Sample
4000
1
A
2
B
3
C
4
D
5
E
6
F
7
G
8
H
9
I
10
J
11
K
12
L
Average
3000
2000
1000
0
0
20
40
60
85
80
Volatite Matter(% )
Fig. 15. Relationship between caloric value and volatile matter.
300500 8C
500800 8C
8001200 8C
18
25.6
32.9
27
36.5
18.9
19.6
28.6
24.21
27.96
18.18
18
24.6
30.2
34
40.9
47
38.8
56.4
48.6
49.5
46.55
40.87
46.24
47
43.84
13.9
13.9
16.3
12.4
18.1
9.9
16.2
10.15
18.84
16.21
19.48
25.4
15.9
0.6
1.0
2.64
2.3
2.32
2.04
1.66
1.65
2.24
0.72
1.31
1.4
1.65
Model description
Model name: Pyres Diamond TGA/DTA analyzer
Company name: Perkin Elmer
Following are the conditions, selected for the test
Maximum temperature of test = 1200 8C
Rate of heating = 100 8C/min.
Medium of test = air
T (8C)
100
0.61
95.7
0.6
96.5
0.65
96.9
0.5
95
0.5
98
0.68
95.9
0.7
95.4
0.8
95.6
0.7
95
0.7
95
0.88
93.7
0.7
95
200
0.60
91.8
0.6
91.7
0.8
89
0.5
89
0.5
90.4
0.6
88.6
0.6
89
0.78
88.2
0.6
89.2
0.6
89.8
0.8
87.5
0.7
90
300
5.0
77.7
8.0
70.9
7.5
64
8
68
8.0
61.5
7.8
77
6.2
75.8
12.4
67
6.2
70.9
7.4
67.1
8
75.5
7.5
77
400
1.70
54.5
1.8
45
2
34
2.5
32
2.6
34.8
2.6
36
4.8
40
0.8
28
1.8
35
2.0
39.1
2.2
45.6
2.6
34
500
1.70
47.5
1.7
36.9
1.6
23.1
1.4
21
0.63
22.7
0.72
20.6
0.84
27.2
0.78
17.5
1.2
24.2
1.4
26.2
0.75
29.3
0.9
30
800
0.0
35
0.0
23
0.0
6.8
0.0
8.6
0.0
4.6
0.0
10.7
0.0
11
0.0
7.35
0.0
5.4
0.0
10
0.0
9.78
0.0
4.6
1000
0.0
34.6
0.0
22
0.0
5
0.0
6.8
0.0
2.0
0.0
9.06
0.0
10
0.0
6.09
0.0
3.62
0.0
9.58
0.0
8.58
0.0
7.2
1200
0.0
34.4
0.0
22
0.0
4.16
0.0
6.3
0.0
2.28
0.0
8.66
0.0
5.7
0.0
3.16
0.0
9.28
0.0
8.47
0.0
6.2
0.0
9.34
86
S. Jain, M.P. Sharma / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011) 6990
Table 18
Total energy content of biogas produced from MSW of Haridwar city.
SN.
Heating value
of biogas
(MJ/m3)
Biogas
generated
per day (m3)
Energy value
of biogas
(MJ/day)
20
140
532,000
C3 H4 O3 2H ! C2 H6 O CO2
or to lactic acid
and between 800 and 1200 8C is 1.65%.it is clear from the Table 17,
the major part of mass is lost between 300 and 500 8C. Therefore
the MSW samples are not suitable for combustion at high
temperature. As the temperature of direct incineration process is
around 1200 8C, the MSW of Haridwar city is not suitable for
incineration process but for biological process it is suitable.
4. Potential of MSW for Haridwar city
C3 H4 O3 2H ! C3 H6 O3
pyruvic acid can also be converted to butyric acid:
C3 H4 O3 ! C4 H8 O2 2CO2
or converted to succinic acid
C3 H4 O3 CO2 2H ! C4 H6 O4 H2 O
=20 MJ/m
=190 110 m3
=26,600 m3
Energy content of biogas
=532,000 MJ/day
[()TD$FIG]
S. Jain, M.P. Sharma / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011) 6990
87
Table 19
Cost analysis of IC engine plant in dual mode without subsidy.
SN.
Item
Capital cost
Cost (Rs.)
Annual charges
4,00,00,000
3.0
Cost
Cost
Cost
Cost
of
of
of
of
biogas digester
diesel engine and generator assembly including installation cost
waste land
construction
2,50,00,000
2,50,00,000
0
1,00,00,000
6,00,00,000
12,00,000
60,00,000
84,00,000
25,00,000
25,00,000
2,19,00,000
S. Jain, M.P. Sharma / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011) 6990
88
Table 20
Cost analysis of IC engine plant in dual mode with subsidy.
SN.
Item
Capital cost
Cost (Rs.)
Cost
Cost
Cost
Cost
of
of
of
of
biogas digester
diesel engine and generator assembly including installation cost
waste land
construction
2,50,00,000
2,50,00,000
0
1,00,00,000
6,00,00,000
Subsidy
Annual charges
3,60,00,000
3,38,60,000
2.6
1 mol
16 molecular
44 molecular
weight
weight
1 kg CH4
2.75 kg CO2
12,00,000
24,00,000
33,60,000
25,00,000
25,00,000
2,19,00,000
S. Jain, M.P. Sharma / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011) 6990
89
Table 21
Cost analysis of IC engine plant in pure biogas mode without subsidy.
SN.
Item
Capital cost
Cost (Rs.)
Cost
Cost
Cost
Cost
of
of
of
of
biogas digester
diesel engine and generator assembly including installation cost
waste land
construction
Annual charges
2,50,00,000
2,30,00,000
0
1,00,00,000
5,80,00,000
11,60,000
58,00,000
81,20,000
25,00,000
23,00,000
19,880,000
1.84
Table 22
Cost analysis of IC engine plant in pure biogas mode with subsidy.
SN.
Item
Capital cost
Cost (Rs.)
Cost
Cost
Cost
Cost
of
of
of
of
biogas digester
diesel engine and generator assembly including installation cost
waste land
construction
2,50,00,000
2,30,00,000
0
1,00,00,000
5,80,00,000
Subsidy
Annual charges
3,00,00,000
1,26,80,000
1.20
11,60,000
28,00,000
39,20,000
25,00,000
23,00,000
S. Jain, M.P. Sharma / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011) 6990
90
Table 23
Comparison of two technologies.
SN.
Technology
1
2
1.8
1.5
2.5
1.1
1 mol
1 mol
16 molecular
44 molecular
weight
weight
1 kg CH4
2.75 kg CO2
Rai GD. Renewable Energy Sources, Text Book. Dhanpat Rai Publication; 2008.
Annual Report, MNES, 2008.
http://www.opec.com.
http://www.smh.com.au/news.
Information And Public Awareness, yearly booklet issued by MNRE, Govt. of
India.
http://www.indiasolar.com/MNES-PROFILE.htm.
Wind Energy, yearly booklet issued by MNRE, Govt. of India.
http://www.awea.org/faq/business.htm.
Biomass, yearly booklet issued by MNRE, Govt. of India.
Sah, SL Renewable Energy Sources/India, 1995.
Wind Power Encyclopedia. [http://www.windpower/data.htm].
Energy Recovery From Waste, yearly booklet issued by MNRE, Govt. of India.
Beukering, PV, Gupta, J, Integrated Solid Waste Management in Developing
Countries, Solid Waste Management Journal,2000.
Hogland, W. Marques, Waste Management In Developing Countries, Solid
Waste Management Journal, 2000.
Energy Information Administration, Ofce of Coal, Nuclear, Electro and Alternate Fuels.
TERI Energy Data Directory & Yearbook 2005/2006.
http://www.eia.doe.gov/.
Haridwar Nagar Palika Parishad. [HNPP].
http://mnes.nic.in/annualreport/2002_2003.
http://www.ireda.nic.in.
A Report of Uttarakhand Urban Development Project, Govt of Uttarakhand.
http://www.indiamaps.com.
Bhide, AD, Solid Waste Management In India [SEA/ENV SAN/
167,W.H.O.,1967], P.34.
http://www.skgsangha.org.
http://www.tide-india.com.
http://www.iisc.ernet.in.
Gopalkrishnan, NK, Biogas Technology, An Information Package, TERI.
Oonk, H, Weenk, A, Coops, O, Luning, L. [1994] Validation of Landll Gas
Formation Models; EWAB 9427; NOVEM, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Baseline Methology For Biomethanation Of Municipal Solid Waste In India,
Using Compliance With MSW Rules,UNFCCC/CCNUCC,AM0012/Version
01,2004.