Está en la página 1de 2

58698 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.

194 / Friday, October 7, 2005 / Notices

Issued in Washington, DC, on October 1, e-mail to reprocessing is not HLW if the


2005. matthew.duchesne@em.doe.gov, or by provisions set forth in Section 3116 are
James N. Solit, Fax at (202) 586–4314. satisfied. DOE will issue a final waste
Advisory Committee Management Officer. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Since determination for Tanks 18 and 19
[FR Doc. 05–20256 Filed 10–6–05; 8:45 am] 1954, SRS Tank Farms F and H have following the completion of
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P received over 140 million gallons (Mgal) consultation with the NRC, and
of waste from SRS nuclear material consideration of any public comments.
processing facilities. Much of this waste Issued in Washington, DC, on October 3,
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY resulted from the reprocessing of spent 2005.
nuclear fuel for defense purposes, Mark A. Gilbertson,
Office of Environmental Management;
which has been commingled with non- Deputy Assistant, Secretary for
Notice of Availability of Draft Section
reprocessing waste. The waste tanks Environmental Cleanup and Acceleration.
3116 Determination Concerning
contain two distinct types of radioactive [FR Doc. 05–20257 Filed 10–6–05; 8:45 am]
Disposal of Residual Tank Wastes in
waste material, approximately 3 Mgal of
Tanks 18 and 19 at the Savannah River BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
radioactive sludge and approximately
Site
34 Mgal of salt waste. DOE’s plans call
AGENCY: Office of Environmental for stabilizing and disposing of retrieved
Management, Department of Energy. sludge in a deep geologic repository for ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
ACTION: Notice of availability. spent nuclear fuel and high-level AGENCY
radioactive waste. Regarding the salt
SUMMARY: The Department of Energy waste, DOE contemplates removing [ER–FRL–6668–2]
(DOE) announces the availability of a fission products and actinides from
draft determination concerning the Environmental Impact Statements and
these materials using a variety of Regulations; Availability of EPA
permanent, in-situ disposal of residual technologies and solidifying the
tank wastes (including tank structure Comments
remaining low-activity salt stream into a
and equipment) in liquid radioactive grout matrix, known as saltstone grout, Availability of EPA comments
waste tanks 18 and 19 at the F-Tank suitable for disposal in vaults at the prepared pursuant to the Environmental
Farm (FTF) at the Savannah River Site Saltstone Disposal Waste Determination. Review Process (ERP), under section
(SRS) near Aiken, South Carolina. DOE This Determination addresses only 309 of the Clean Air Act and Section
prepared the draft determination the permanent disposal of the residual 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental
pursuant to Section 3116 of the Ronald materials contaminating Tank 18 and Policy Act as amended. Requests for
W. Reagan National Defense Tank 19, as well as the structure of the copies of EPA comments can be directed
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005, tanks themselves and ancillary to the Office of Federal Activities at
which authorizes the Secretary of equipment. Both tanks have a nominal 202–564–7167.
Energy, in consultation with the Nuclear operating capacity of 1.3 Mgal. Waste An explanation of the ratings assigned
Regulatory Commission, to determine removal operations for Tank 18 were to draft environmental impact
that certain waste from reprocessing is initiated in 1985 and completed in statements (EISs) was published in the
not high-level waste (HLW) if the 2003. Tank 18 now holds approximately Federal Register dated April 1, 2005 (70
provisions set forth in section 3116 are 4.3 thousand gallons (Kgal) of residual FR 16815).
satisfied. Although not required by the material. Waste removal operations for
Act, DOE is making the draft Draft EISs
Tank 19 were initiated in 1981 and
determination available for public completed in 2001, and it now holds EIS No. 20050066, ERP No. D–FAA–
review and comment. approximately 15.1 Kgal of residual B40165–MA, New Bedford Regional
DATES: The comment period will end on material. DOE plans to fill both tanks Airport Improvements Project, To
November 21, 2005. Comments received with a reducing grout designed to Enhance Aviation Capacity, Air
after this date will be considered to the stabilize and solidify the residual Traffic, Jet Traffic, Air Cargo and
extent practicable. material. This method was chosen as the General Aviation Traffic,
ADDRESSES: The draft waste least hazardous and most Southeastern Massachusetts Region,
determination is available on the environmentally preferable alternative. City of New Bedford, Bristol County,
Internet at http://apps.em.doe.gov/swd, It will reduce migration of contaminants MA.
and is publicly available for review at into the environment; prevent Summary: EPA commented on the
the following locations: U.S. inadvertent intrusion; minimize free- lack of information to characterize the
Department of Energy, Public Reading standing liquids; and minimize void severity of adverse direct and indirect
Room, 1000 Independence Avenue, spaces in the tank. After final pouring impacts to wetlands, and encouraged
SW., Washington, DC 20585, Phone: of the stabilizing grout, a layer of higher- the FAA to consider enhancement of a
(202) 586–5955, or Fax: (202) 586–0575; strength grout will be poured into the less damaging runway safety area
and U.S. Department of Energy, tanks to further discourage human/ alternative. The comments also
Savannah River Operations Office, animal inadvertent intrusion. In requested a mitigation plan to
Public Reading Room, 171 University addition, institutional controls (access compensate for unavoidable losses at
Parkway, Aiken, SC 29801, Phone: (803) restriction and groundwater monitoring) wetlands.
641–3320, or Fax: (803) 641–3302. will be implemented and maintained in
Written comments should be addressed accordance with Federal and State Rating EO2
to: Mr. Matthew Duchesne, U.S. agreements. EIS No. 20050137, ERP No. D–AFS–
Department of Energy, Office of Final Determination: Section 3116 B65013–VT, Green Mountain National
Environmental Management, EM–2, authorizes the Secretary of Energy, in Forest, Propose Revised Land and
1000 Independence Avenue, SW., consultation with the Nuclear Resource Management Plan,
Washington, DC 20585. Alternatively, Regulatory Commission (NRC), to Implementation, Forest Plan Revision,
comments can be filed electronically by determine that certain waste from Addison, Bennington, Rutland,

VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:27 Oct 06, 2005 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07OCN1.SGM 07OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 194 / Friday, October 7, 2005 / Notices 58699

Washington, Windham and Windsor preferred alternative because of EIS No. 20050402, Final EIS, FHW, UT,
Counties, VT. potential adverse impacts to source Iron County Transportation Corridors,
Summary: EPA has no objections to water, streams and water quality, Construction from Station Road 56 to
the proposed project, but supports wetlands and aquatic resources. EPA Exit 51 on Interstate 15, Funding and
alternatives C, D or E as those that best supports the transition from unmanaged Right-of-Way Grant, Southwest of the
address resource protection. motorized recreation to restricted travel Cedar City Limits, Iron County, UT,
and suggests the final EIS include Wait Period Ends: 11/07/2005,
Rating LO specific analyses of the direct, indirect Contact: Gregory S. Punske 801–963–
EIS No. 20050226, ERP No. D–FHW– and cumulative impacts of this 0182.
B40095–RI, U.S. Route 6/Route 10 proposed plan. EIS No. 20050403, Final EIS, AFS, CA,
Interchange Improvement Project, To Watdog Project, Proposes to Reduce
Identify Transportation Alternative, Rating EC2 Fire Hazards, Harvest Trees, Using
Funding, City of Providence, EIS No. 20050240, ERP No. DS–FTA– Group Selection Methods, Feather
Providence County, RI. B54007–WA, Silver Line Phase III River Ranger District, Plumas
Summary: EPA has environmental (previously known as South Boston National Forest, Butte and Plumas
concerns about the impacts to water and Pier) Project, Updated Information to Counties, CA, Wait Period Ends: 11/
air quality as well as environmental Physically Integrate Silver Line Phase 07/2005, Contact: Susan Joyce 530–
justice issues. I and II, Massachusetts Bay 532–6500.
Transportation Authority’s, Funding, EIS No. 20050404, Draft EIS, DOI, OH,
Rating EC2 MA. First Ladies National Historic Site
EIS No. 20050247, ERP No. D–SFW– Summary: EPA has no objections to General Management Plan,
K64025–AZ, Cabeza Prieta National the proposed project. Implementation, Canton, OH,
Wildlife Refuge, Comprehensive Comment Period Ends: 11/30/2005,
Conservation Plan, Wilderness Rating LO Contact: Nick Chevance 402–661–
Stewardship Plan, Implementation, Final EISs 1844.
Ajo, AZ. EIS No. 20050405, Draft EIS, NPS, NV,
EIS No. 20050341, ERP No. F–COE– Clean Water Coalition Systems
Summary: EPA has no objection to the G32058–00, Arkansas River
proposed project. Conveyance and Operations Program,
Navigation Study, To Maintain and Construction, Operation and
Rating LO Improve the Navigation Channel in Maintenance, City of Las Vegas, City
EIS No. 20050256, ERP No. D–AFS– Order to Enhance Commercial County, NV, Comment Period Ends:
J65446–MT, Beaverhead-Deerlodge Navigation on the McCellan Kerr 12/06/2005, Contact: Michael Boyles
National Forest Draft Revised Land Arkansa River Navigation System 702–293–8978.
and Resource Management Plan, (MKARNS), Several Counties, AR and EIS No. 20050406, Draft EIS, FHW, WA,
Implementation, Beaverhead, Butte- Several Counties, OK. South Park Bridge Project, Proposes to
Silver Bow, Deerlodge, Granite, Summary: No formal comment letter Rehabilitate or Replace the Historic
Jefferson, Madison Counties, MT. was sent to the preparing agency. South Park Ridge over the Duwamish
Summary: EPA generally supports the Dated: October 4, 2005. Waterway at 14th/16 Avenue S, U.S.
forestwide aquatic strategy, watershed Robert W. Hargrove, Coast Guard Permit and U.S. Army
restoration and revised management Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office COE Section 10 and 404 Permits, King
practices. However, EPA expressed of Federal Activities. County, WA, Comment Period Ends: ,
environmental concerns about [FR Doc. 05–20207 Filed 10–6–05; 8:45 am] 11/21/2005, Contact: Jim Leonard
continued impacts to water quality, the BILLING CODE 6560–50–U
360–753–9408.
level of watershed protection and EIS No. 20050407, Final EIS, NPS, AZ,
restoration, management direction for Saguaro National Park Fire
roads and other resources, and ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Management Plan, Implementation,
environmental protection management AGENCY Tucson, AZ, Wait Period Ends: 11/07/
measures. 2005, Contact: Sarah Craighead 520–
[ER–FRL–6668–1] 733–5101.
Rating EC2 EIS No. 20050408, Final EIS, FHW, WI,
EIS No. 20050301, ERP No. D–FAA– Environmental Impacts Statements; US 41 Highway Corridor Project,
A12043–00, PROGRAMMATIC— Notice of Availability Transportation Improvement between
Horizontal Launch and Reentry of Responsible Agency: Office of Federal the Cities of Oconto and Perhtigo,
Reentry Vehicles, Facilitate the Activities, General Information (202) Funding, Marinette and Oconto
Issuance of Licenses in United States. 564–7167 or http://www.epa.gov/ Counties, WI, Wait Period Ends: 11/
Summary: EPA has no objection to the compliance/nepa/. 07/2005, Contact: Johhny Gerbitz
proposed action. Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact 608–829–7500.
Statements EIS No. 20050409, Final EIS, AFS, OR,
Rating LO
Filed 09/26/2005 Through 09/30/2005 Joseph Creek Rangeland Analysis
EIS No. 20050315, ERP No. D–AFS– Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9. Project, Proposal to Allocate Forage
J65449–UT, Fishlake National Forest EIS No. 20050401, Draft Supplement, for Commercial Livestock Grazing on
Off-Highway Vehicle Route SFW, CA, Southern Sea Otters Eleven Allotment, Wallowa-Whitman
Designation Project, Proposes to (Enhydra lutris nereis) Translocation National Forests, Wallowa Valley
Designate a System of Motorized Program, New and Updated Ranger District, Wallowa County, OR,
Road, Trails, and Areas to Revise and Information, San Nicolas Island, Wait Period Ends: 11/07/2005,
Update the Existing Motorized Travel Southern California Bight, CA, Contact: Alicia Glassford 541–426–
Plan, UT. Comment Period Ends: 01/05/2006, 5689.
Summary: EPA expressed Contact: Greg Sander 805–644–1766 EIS No. 20050411, Draft EIS, IBR, CA,
environmental concerns about the Ext. 315. Central Valley Project, West San

VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:27 Oct 06, 2005 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07OCN1.SGM 07OCN1

También podría gustarte