Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
8 lessons
from the life of a liaison psychiatrist
How
to
get
more of what
you want and
keep hold of
the little you
have
Lesson 1.
Get with the
Lesson 2.
Find out who the real commissioners
are
Westminster PCT
Harrow PCT
Liaison Psychiatry
at St Marys
Brent PCT
Lesson 3.
It pays to
Lesson 4.
Get your patients on side...
Lesson 5.
Have all of those reports on
the tip of your tongue...
Lesson 6.
a little bit of teaching
can do you a lot of good...
Lesson 7.
Go forth and multiply.
Lesson 8.
By any means necessary.
Serious
Untoward
Incident
OUTLINE
Hahn (2001)
DIFFICULTIES IN DOCTOR-PATIENT
RELATIONSHIP: CORRELATIONS WITH
NUMBER OF SOMATOFORM
Extent
of frustration with patients
SYMPTOMS
0.31*
symptoms
0.19
0.14
0.14
0.11
Hahn (2001)
CORRELATIONS WITH GP
CLINICAL GRADING OF
GP questionnaire item
SOMATISATION
0.35
<0.001
Patient-rated somatisation
symptoms
0.09
ns
Chronic diseases
0.11
0.023
Functional syndromes
0.18
<0.001
0.26
<0.001
-0.28
<0.001
0.56
<0.001
0.52
<0.001
Tiresome patient
0.54
Schilte <0.001
et al (2000)
20
40
60
80
100
% Respondents Agreeing
Reid et al (2001)
Yes
No
No
No
CFS
Raine et al (2004)
CFS
Anatomical/physiological
basis for syndrome
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
Raine et al (2004)
IATROGENIC FACTORS IN
SOMATISATION
DOCTORS
CONCERNS
CONSEQUENCES
Fear of missing a
physical disease
Excessive examination
Concern about
complaints
Lack of accessible
psychiatric
treatment
IATROGENIC FACTORS IN
SOMATISATION
DOCTORS CONCERNS
CONSEQUENCES
Focus exclusively on
biomedical aspects
Avoidance of any
exploration of patients
psychological state
DO PATIENTS WITH
SOMATISATION PRESSURIZE THEIR
from 21
36 patients
DOCTORS?
practices
Effects of symptoms on
34 received somatic
interventions
27 drug
prescriptions
12 investigations
4 specialist referrals
Only 10 patients
requested somatic
interventions
Attributed to
Patient
Pressure
patients life
Graphic and emotive
language
Biomedical explanations
Emotional distress
caused by symptoms
External authority
Criticism and negation
Complexity of
presentation
Ring A et al (2004)
20
40
60
80
100
% Respondents Agreeing
Reid et al (2001)
Reid et al (2001)
REASSURANCE NO-DISEASE
PERSUASIVE STATEMENTS
Three types of statement
Provision of a non-disease
FEATURES
IMPLICATIONS
Unresolved explanatory
conflict
Doctor distrusted with
future symptoms
COLLUSIO
N
Acquiescence by doctor
to explanation offered by
patient
Questioning of doctor's
openness and
competence
EMPOWER
-MENT
Tangible mechanism
Exculpation
Opportunity for self
management
Legitimises patient's
suffering
Patient understands and
owns the explanation
Removes blame from
patient
Allies doctor and patient
Salmon P et al (1999)
MAKING ATTRIBUTIONS
It is
commonly
assumed that
in making
attributions,
individuals
think like lay
scientists
INTERVENTIONS FOR
SOMATOFORM DISORDERS
INTERVENTIONS FOR
SOMATOFORM DISORDERS
SIMPLE
REASSURANCE
REATTRIBUTION
SPECIALIST
INTERVENTION
NB even simple
interventions
can have serious
adverse effects
INTERVENTIONS FOR
SOMATOFORM DISORDERS
SIMPLE
REASSURANCE
REATTRIBUTION
SPECIALIST
INTERVENTION
NB even simple
interventions
can have serious
adverse effects
ATTRIBUTIONS
Examples of attributions for I feel my
heart pounding in my chest
NORMALIZING
PSYCHOLOGICA
L
I must be really
excited or afraid
SOMATIC
There must be
something wrong with
my heart
Attributed to situational
(environmental) factors
Explanation
insufficient
PSYCHOLOGICAL SOMATIC
ATTRIBUTION ATTRIBUTION
PATHOLOGICAL
NORMALIZING
ATTRIBUTION
NORMALIZING
ATTRIBUTION
BENIGN
ATTRIBUTION FREQUENCY BY
TYPE
Normalizing
Psychological
I nfrequent attenders
Frequent attenders
Somatic
0
Mean number of
explanations
3
Sensky,
MacLeod &
Rigby (1996)
Attributed to situational
(environmental) factors
Explanation
insufficient
PSYCHOLOGICAL SOMATIC
ATTRIBUTION ATTRIBUTION
PATHOLOGICAL
NORMALIZING
ATTRIBUTION
NORMALIZING
ATTRIBUTION
BENIGN
Attributed to situational
(environmental) factors
Explanation
insufficient
PSYCHOLOGICAL SOMATIC
ATTRIBUTION ATTRIBUTION
PATHOLOGICAL
NORMALIZING
ATTRIBUTION
NORMALIZING
ATTRIBUTION
BENIGN
// 43
Stone et al (2002)
CONTACT DETAILS
Tom Sensky
t.sensky@imperial.ac.uk