Está en la página 1de 2

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.

186 / Tuesday, September 26, 2006 / Notices 56203

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the Commission, by the Division of extensions of time under Regulation T 7
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 a Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated promulgated by the Federal Reserve
proposed rule change to adopt a new authority.9 Board, or pursuant to Rule 15c3–3(n)
NASD rule relating to trade-throughs. Nancy M. Morris, under the Act; and (2) each clearing firm
The proposed rule change was Secretary. member for which NASD is the DEA to
published for comment in the Federal [FR Doc. 06–8238 Filed 9–25–06; 8:45 am] file a monthly report with NASD
Register on July 27, 2006.3 The BILLING CODE 8010–01–P indicating all broker-dealers for which it
Commission received no comment clears that have overall ratios of
letters on the proposal. requested extensions of time to total
Proposed rule NASD Rule 5150 would SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE transactions for the month that exceed
require an NASD member that is COMMISSION a percentage specified by NASD.
registered as a market maker with the [Release No. 34–54456; File No. SR–NASD–
Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (‘‘Nasdaq Extension of Time Requests
2006–064]
Exchange’’) in an ITS Security 4 to As stated above, proposed NASD Rule
comply with the provisions of NASD Self-Regulatory Organizations; 3160(a) would require all clearing firm
Rule 5262 relating to trade-throughs National Association of Securities members for which NASD is DEA to
with respect to that security for trades Dealers, Inc.; Order Approving a submit to NASD requests for extensions
reported to the NASD. Accordingly, the Proposed Rule Change and of time under Regulation T and
NASD’s proposed rule will not take Amendment Nos. 1 and 2 Thereto Exchange Act Rule 15c3–3(n). The
effect until the Nasdaq Exchange begins Relating to Extension of Time Commission previously approved NYSE
operations as an exchange in such Requests Rule 434 requiring each carrying firm
securities.5 The proposed rule further for which the NYSE is the DEA to
defines the term ‘‘block transaction’’ for September 15, 2006. submit extensions requests to the
purposes of the rule. I. Introduction NYSE.8 The SRO designated as a
The Commission finds that the member’s DEA has responsibility for
proposed rule change is consistent with On May 15, 2006, the National examining its members that are also
the requirements of Section 15A of the Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. members of another SRO for compliance
Act,6 in general, and with Section (‘‘NASD’’) filed with the Securities and with applicable financial responsibility
15A(b)(6) of the Act,7 in particular, in Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or rules such as Regulation T and
that it is designed to prevent fraudulent ‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section Exchange Act Rule 15c3–3. NASD
and manipulative acts and practices, to 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act believes that requiring a member to
promote just and equitable principles of of 1934 (‘‘Act’’ or ‘‘Exchange Act’’) 1 and submit extension requests to its DEA
trade and, in general, to protect Rule 19b–4 2 thereunder, a proposed helps to ensure that the DEA receives
investors and the public interest. rule change seeking to adopt new Rule complete extension information to assist
Proposed NASD Rule 5150 will 3160 (‘‘Extensions of Time under it in performing this function and would
maintain, after the Nasdaq Exchange Regulation T and SEC Rule 15c3–3’’). ensure uniform application of standards
begins operations as a national NASD filed Amendment Nos. 1 and 2 to to all customers of firms for which
securities exchange for ITS Securities, the proposed rule change on May 25, NASD is the DEA.
the application of the NASD’s trade- 2006 and July 25, 2006, respectively.3
The proposed rule change, as amended, Monthly Reporting Requirement
through rule, Rule 5162, to NASD
members that are also Nasdaq market was published in the Federal Register Proposed NASD Rule 3160(b) would
makers in ITS Securities to the extent on August 10, 2006.4 The Commission require each clearing firm member for
such market makers report transactions received one comment letter in response which NASD is the DEA to file a
in ITS Securities to the NASD. to the proposal.5 On September 13, monthly report with NASD, in such
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to 2006, the NASD filed a response to the format as NASD may require, indicating
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,8 that the comment letter.6 This order approves all broker-dealers for which it clears that
proposed rule change (SR–NASD–2006– the proposed rule change, as amended. have overall ratios of requests for
081) be, and hereby is, approved. II. Description extensions of time under Regulation T
and Rule 15c3–3(m) to total transactions
1 15
NASD is proposing to adopt new Rule for the month that exceed a percentage
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 3160 to require (1) All clearing firm specified by NASD. The monthly report
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54186 members for which NASD is the would require clearing firms subject to
(July 20, 2006), 71 FR 42698. designated examining authority proposed NASD Rule 3160(b) to
4 The term ‘‘ITS Security’’ is defined in NASD
(‘‘DEA’’) pursuant to Rule 17d–1 under identify, among other things: (1) The
Rule 5210(c) as ‘‘any security which may be traded the Act to submit to NASD requests for
through the [ITS] System by an ITS/CAES Market broker-dealer’s name; (2) the number of
Maker.’’
1 15
transactions by the broker-dealer for the
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53128 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17
month; (3) the number of extension
(January 13, 2006), 71 FR 3550 (January 23, 2006); CFR 240.19b–4.
and 54085 (June 30, 2006), 71 FR 38910 (July 10, 3 See Amendment No. 1 and Amendment No. 2. requests for the month; and (4) the ratio
2006). Currently, the Nasdaq Exchange operates as Amendment No. 2 replaced and superceded the of the number of extensions requested to
a national securities exchange for securities listed original rule filing and Amendment No. 1 in their total transactions. The rule proposal
on the Nasdaq Exchange and reported to the Joint entirety. would require that the reports be
Self-Regulatory Organization Plan Governing the 4 Exchange Act Release No. 54265 (August 2,
Collection, Consolidation and Dissemination of
submitted no later than five business
2006), 71 FR 45879 (August 10, 2006).
Quotation and Transaction Information for Nasdaq- 5 See letter from Dennis A. Young, Vice President,
days following the end of each reporting
Listed Securities on Exchanges on an Unlisted Treasurer, Cosse International Securities, Inc., to month. The requirements of the
pwalker on PRODPC60 with NOTICES

Trading Privileges Basis (‘‘Nasdaq-Listed Nancy Morris, Secretary, Commission, dated


Securities’’). August 31, 2006. 7 See 12 CFR 220.1, et. seq.
6 15 U.S.C. 78o–3.
6 See letter from Kathryn M. Moore, Assistant 8 See Exchange Act Release No. 34073 (May 17,
7 15 U.S.C. 78o–3(b)(6).
General Counsel, Regulatory Policy and Oversight, 1994), 59 FR 26826 (May 24, 1994) (SR–NYSE–88–
8 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary, Commission, dated 35); see also NYSE Information Memo 94–22 (June
9 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). September 13, 2006. 10, 1994).

VerDate Aug<31>2005 21:03 Sep 25, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00104 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\26SEN1.SGM 26SEN1
56204 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 186 / Tuesday, September 26, 2006 / Notices

proposed NASD monthly reporting NASD–2006–064), as amended, be, and II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
requirement are consistent with the it hereby is approved. Statement of the Purpose of, and
NYSE’s current program.9 For the Commission, by the Division of
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
Change
III. Summary of Comment Received
and NASD Response authority.14 In its filing with the Commission, the
Nancy M. Morris, Exchange included statements
The Commission received one
concerning the purpose of, and basis for,
comment letter to the proposed rule Secretary.
the proposed rule change and discussed
change.10 The commenter stated that the [FR Doc. 06–8239 Filed 9–25–06; 8:45 am]
any comments it received on the
proposed monthly reporting BILLING CODE 8010–01–P proposed rule change. The text of these
requirement would place an undue statements may be examined at the
burden on self-clearing firms and places specified in Item III below. The
requested that NASD amend the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Exchange has prepared summaries, set
proposed rule to clarify that the COMMISSION forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
monthly reporting requirement applies the most significant aspects of such
solely to clearing firms which clear for [Release No. 34–54473; File No. SR– statements.
other broker-dealers. In its response, NYSEArca–2006–60]
NASD stated that it did not intend for A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
the proposed monthly reporting Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Statement of the Purpose of, and
requirement to apply to self-clearing Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Order Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
firms that do not clear for other broker- Change
Granting Accelerated Approval of
dealers, and that the proposed rule Proposed Rule Change Relating to 1. Purpose
would not require these self-clearing Trading Shares of iShares S&P
firms to file the monthly report. 11 Under NYSE Arca Equities Rule
Global Index Funds Pursuant to 5.2(j)(3), the Exchange may propose to
Finally, NASD stated that it will Unlisted Trading Privileges
reiterate this position in the Notice to list or trade pursuant to UTP
Members announcing Commission ‘‘Investment Company Units.’’ 3 The
September 20, 2006.
approval of the proposed rule. Commission previously approved a
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the proposal to list and trade the Shares of
IV. Discussion and Commission Securities Exchange Act of 1934 the Funds by the New York Stock
Findings (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 Exchange, LLC (‘‘NYSE’’).4 The
The Commission has reviewed the notice is hereby given that on Exchange proposes to trade pursuant to
proposed rule filing, as amended, and September 14, 2006, NYSE Arca, Inc. UTP the Shares of the Funds under
finds that the proposed rule change, as (‘‘Exchange’’), through its wholly owned NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3).5
amended, is consistent with the subsidiary NYSE Arca Equities, Inc. Because the Funds invest in non-U.S.
requirements of the Exchange Act, and, (‘‘NYSE Arca Equities’’ or the securities not listed on a national
in particular, Section 15A(b)(6) of the ‘‘Corporation’’), filed with the Securities securities exchange or the Nasdaq Stock
Act,12 which requires, among other and Exchange Commission Market (‘‘Nasdaq’’), the Funds do not
things, that NASD’s rules must be (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule meet the ‘‘generic’’ listing requirements
designed to prevent fraudulent and change as described in Items I and II
3 In October 1999, the Commission approved
manipulative acts and practices, to below, which Items have been prepared NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3), which sets forth
promote just and equitable principles of by the Exchange. The Commission is the rules related to listing and trading criteria for
trade, and, in general, to protect publishing this notice to solicit Investment Company Units. See Securities
investors and the public interest. The comments on the proposed rule change Exchange Act Release No. 41983 (October 6, 1999),
64 FR 56008 (October 15, 1999) (SR–PCX–1998–29).
Commission believes that the proposed from interested persons and is In July 2001, the Commission also approved the
rule change will further assist NASD in approving the proposal on an Exchange’s generic listing standards for listing and
ensuring that firms are complying with accelerated basis. trading, or the trading pursuant to UTP, of
financial responsibility rules and Investment Company Units under NYSE Arca
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3). See Securities Exchange Act
preventing the excessive use of credit Release No. 44551 (July 12, 2001), 66 FR 37716–01
for the purchase or carrying of Statement of the Terms of Substance of (July 19, 2001) (SR–PCX–2001–14). The definition
securities. the Proposed Rule Change of an Investment Company Unit is set forth in NYSE
Arca Equities Rule 5.1(b)(15), which provides that
V. Conclusion The Exchange proposes to trade an Investment Company Unit is a security
shares (‘‘Shares’’) of the following five representing an interest in a registered investment
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to company that could be organized as a unit
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,13 that the funds of the iShares Trust (the investment trust, an open-end management
proposed rule change (File No. SR– ‘‘Trust’’): iShares S&P Global Consumer investment company or a similar entity.
Discretionary Sector Index Fund, 4 See Securities Exchange Release No. 54458

9 See Exchange Act Release No. 28726 (December iShares S&P Global Consumer Staples (September 15, 2006) (SR–NYSE–2006–60) (the
‘‘NYSE Proposal’’).
28, 1990), 56 FR 540 (January 7, 1991) (SR–NYSE– Sector Index Fund, iShares S&P Global 5 NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3)(A)(i)(a) allows
89–24); and NYSE Information Memoranda 98–09 Industrials Sector Index Fund, iShares the listing and trading of Investment Company
(March 5, 1998) and 94–22 (June 10, 1994); see also
NYSE Information Memorandum 05–78 (October
S&P Global Utilities Sector Index Fund Units issued by a registered investment company
and iShares S&P Global Materials Sector that holds securities comprising, or otherwise based
12, 2005).
on or representing an interest in, an index or
10 See supra note 5. Index Fund (the ‘‘Funds’’) pursuant to portfolio or securities. The Trust is registered under
11 See supra note 6.
unlisted trading privileges (‘‘UTP’’) the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C.
pwalker on PRODPC60 with NOTICES

12 15 U.S.C. 78o–3(b)(6). In approving this


under NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3). 80a) (the ‘‘Investment Company Act’’). On April 15,
proposed rule change, the Commission has 2005, the Trust filed with the Commission a
considered the proposed rule’s impact on Registration Statement for the Funds on Form N–
14 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15 1A under the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77a),
U.S.C. 78c(f). 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). and under the Investment Company Act relating to
13 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. the Funds (File Nos. 333–92935 and 811–09729).

VerDate Aug<31>2005 21:03 Sep 25, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00105 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\26SEN1.SGM 26SEN1

También podría gustarte