Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:58 Dec 11, 2006 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\12DER1.SGM 12DER1
74460 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 238 / Tuesday, December 12, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Contact Boeing Commercial the failure types under evaluation: at some time in the future. Therefore,
Airplanes, Long Beach Division, 3855 Single failures, single failures in we are issuing this AD to detect and
Lakewood Boulevard, Long Beach, combination with a latent condition(s), correct unprotected APU power feeder
California 90846, Attention: Data and and in-service failure experience. For all wires that come into close proximity to
Service Management, Dept. C1–L5A four criteria, the evaluations included the upper surface of the auxiliary ‘‘piggy
(D800–0024), for the service information consideration of previous actions taken back’’ fuel tank, which, if not corrected,
identified in this AD. that may mitigate the need for further could result in a potential ignition
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: action. source, and in combination with fuel
Samuel Lee, Aerospace Engineer, We have determined that the actions vapors, could cause a fuel tank
Propulsion Branch, ANM–140L, FAA, identified in this AD are necessary to explosion and consequent loss of the
Los Angeles Aircraft Certification reduce the potential of ignition sources airplane. This AD requires
Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, inside fuel tanks, which, in combination accomplishing the actions specified in
Lakewood, California 90712–4137; with flammable fuel vapors, could result the service information described
telephone (562) 627–5262; fax (562) in fuel tank explosions and consequent previously.
627–5210. loss of the airplane.
Boeing also conducted an Costs of Compliance
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: investigation and analysis on None of the airplanes affected by this
Discussion McDonnell Douglas Model MD–11 action are on the U.S. Register. All
airplanes that revealed that eleven airplanes affected by this AD are
The FAA has examined the airplanes had two locations of currently operated by non-U.S.
underlying safety issues involved in fuel unprotected auxiliary power unit (APU) operators under foreign registry;
tank explosions on several large power feeder wires that come into close therefore, they are not directly affected
transport airplanes, including the proximity to the upper surface of the by this AD action. However, we
adequacy of existing regulations, the auxiliary ‘‘piggy back’’ fuel tank. consider this AD necessary to ensure
service history of airplanes subject to Unprotected APU power feeder wires that the unsafe condition is addressed if
those regulations, and existing that come into close proximity to the any affected airplane is imported and
maintenance practices for fuel tank upper surface of the auxiliary ‘‘piggy placed on the U.S. Register in the future.
systems. As a result of those findings, back’’ fuel tank, could result in a If an affected airplane is imported and
we issued a regulation titled ‘‘Transport potential ignition source and, in placed on the U.S. Register in the future,
Airplane Fuel Tank System Design combination with flammable fuel the required actions would take about
Review, Flammability Reduction and vapors, could cause a fuel tank 1 work hour per airplane, at an average
Maintenance and Inspection explosion and consequent loss of the labor rate of $80 per work hour. Based
Requirements’’ (66 FR 23086, May 7, airplane. on these figures, the estimated cost of
2001). In addition to new airworthiness the AD would be $80 per airplane.
standards for transport airplanes and Relevant Service Information
new maintenance requirements, this We have reviewed Boeing Alert FAA’s Determination of the Effective
rule included Special Federal Aviation Service Bulletin (ASB) MD11–24A222, Date
Regulation No. 88 (‘‘SFAR 88,’’ dated August 16, 2006. The ASB No airplane affected by this AD is
Amendment 21–78, and subsequent describes procedures for performing a currently on the U.S. Register.
Amendments 21–82 and 21–83). general visual inspection for installation Therefore, providing notice and
Among other actions, SFAR 88 of conduit and chafing damage on the opportunity for public comment is
requires certain type design (i.e., type APU feeder wires and upper surface of unnecessary before this AD is issued,
certificate (TC) and supplemental type the auxiliary fuel tank. If protective and this AD may be made effective in
certificate (STC)) holders to substantiate conduit is installed, the ASB specifies less than 30 days after it is published in
that their fuel tank systems can prevent that no further action is necessary. If no the Federal Register.
ignition sources in the fuel tanks. This protective conduit is installed and no
requirement applies to type design chafing is found, the ASB describes Comments Invited
holders for large turbine-powered procedures for installing sleeving and This AD is a final rule that involves
transport airplanes and for subsequent high temperature tape and replacing requirements that affect flight safety and
modifications to those airplanes. It clamps below the cabin floor beams. If was not preceded by notice and an
requires them to perform design reviews no protective conduit is installed and opportunity for public comment;
and to develop design changes and chafing is found, the ASB describes however, we invite you to submit any
maintenance procedures if their designs procedures to repair any damaged APU relevant written data, views, or
do not meet the new fuel tank safety power feeder wires and any damaged arguments regarding this AD. Send your
standards. As explained in the preamble upper surface of the auxiliary fuel tank comments to an address listed under the
to the rule, we intended to adopt structure, as well as installing sleeving ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
airworthiness directives to mandate any and high temperature tape and replacing FAA–2006–26527; Directorate Identifier
changes found necessary to address clamps below the cabin floor beams. 2006–NM–220–AD’’ at the beginning of
unsafe conditions identified as a result Accomplishing the actions specified in your comments. We specifically invite
of these reviews. the service information is intended to comments on the overall regulatory,
In evaluating these design reviews, we adequately address the unsafe economic, environmental, and energy
have established four criteria intended condition. aspects of the AD that might suggest a
to define the unsafe conditions need to modify it.
associated with fuel tank systems that FAA’s Determination and Requirements We will post all comments we
require corrective actions. The of This AD receive, without change, to http://
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
percentage of operating time during The unsafe condition described dms.dot.gov, including any personal
which fuel tanks are exposed to previously is likely to exist or develop information you provide. We will also
flammable conditions is one of these on other airplanes of the same type post a report summarizing each
criteria. The other three criteria address design that may be registered in the U.S. substantive verbal contact with FAA
VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:58 Dec 11, 2006 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\12DER1.SGM 12DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 238 / Tuesday, December 12, 2006 / Rules and Regulations 74461
personnel concerning this AD. Using the 2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the the compliance times specified, unless the
search function of that Web site, anyone DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures actions have already been done.
can find and read the comments in any (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and General Visual Inspection
of our dockets, including the name of 3. Will not have a significant
the individual who sent the comment economic impact, positive or negative, (f) Within 24 months after the effective
(or signed the comment on behalf of an on a substantial number of small entities date of this AD, perform a general visual
association, business, labor union, etc.). inspection for installation of conduit and
under the criteria of the Regulatory
chafing damage on APU power feeder wires
You may review the DOT’s complete Flexibility Act.
and upper surface of the auxiliary fuel tank,
Privacy Act Statement in the Federal We prepared a regulatory evaluation
in accordance with Boeing Alert Service
Register published on April 11, 2000 of the estimated costs to comply with
Bulletin MD11–24A222, dated August 16,
(65 FR 19477–78), or you may visit this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
2006. Before further flight, accomplish any
http://dms.dot.gov. See the ADDRESSES section for a location applicable repair or replacement in
to examine the regulatory evaluation.
Examining the Docket accordance with the alert service bulletin.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Alternative Methods of Compliance
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at http://dms.dot.gov, or in Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation (AMOCs)
person at the Docket Management safety, Incorporation by reference, (g)(1) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft
Facility office between 9 a.m. and 5 Safety. Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Adoption of the Amendment authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
Federal holidays. The Docket requested in accordance with the procedures
Management Facility office (telephone ■ Accordingly, under the authority found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(800) 647–5227) is located on the plaza delegated to me by the Administrator, (2) Before using any AMOC approved in
level of the Nassif Building at the DOT the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as accordance with § 39.19 on any airplane to
street address stated in the ADDRESSES follows: which the AMOC applies, notify the
section. Comments will be available in appropriate principal inspector in the FAA
the AD docket shortly after the Docket PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS Flight Standards Certificate Holding District
Management System receives them. DIRECTIVES Office.
Authority for This Rulemaking ■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 Material Incorporated by Reference
continues to read as follows: (h) You must use Boeing Alert Service
Title 49 of the United States Code Bulletin MD11–24A222, dated August 16,
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 2006, to perform the actions that are required
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, § 39.13 [Amended] by this AD, unless the AD specifies
section 106, describes the authority of otherwise. The Director of the Federal
■ 2. The Federal Aviation
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Register approved the incorporation by
Administration (FAA) amends § 39.13
Aviation Programs, describes in more reference of this document in accordance
by adding the following new
detail the scope of the Agency’s with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
airworthiness directive (AD):
authority. Contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Long
2006–25–09 McDonnell Douglas:
We are issuing this rulemaking under Beach Division, 3855 Lakewood Boulevard,
Amendment 39–14850. Docket No.
the authority described in subtitle VII, FAA–2006–26527; Directorate Identifier Long Beach, California 90846, Attention:
part A, subpart III, section 44701, 2006–NM–220–AD. Data and Service Management, Dept. C1–L5A
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that (D800–0024), for a copy of this service
section, Congress charges the FAA with Effective Date information. You may review copies at the
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in (a) This AD becomes effective December Docket Management Facility, U.S.
air commerce by prescribing regulations 27, 2006. Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh
for practices, methods, and procedures Affected ADs Street, SW., Room PL–401, Nassif Building,
the Administrator finds necessary for Washington, DC; on the Internet at http://
(b) None.
safety in air commerce. This regulation dms.dot.gov; or at the National Archives and
is within the scope of that authority Applicability Records Administration (NARA). For
because it addresses an unsafe condition (c) This AD applies to certain McDonnell information on the availability of this
that is likely to exist or develop on Douglas Model MD–11F airplanes, identified material at the NARA, call (202) 741–6030,
products identified in this rulemaking in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD11– or go to http://www.archives.gov/
action. 24A222, dated August 16, 2006; certificated federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/
in any category. ibr_locations.html.
Regulatory Findings
Unsafe Condition Issued in Renton, Washington, on
We have determined that this AD will (d) This AD results from fuel system November 30, 2006.
not have federalism implications under reviews conducted by the manufacturer. We Kevin M. Mullin,
Executive Order 13132. This AD will are issuing this AD to detect and correct
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
not have a substantial direct effect on unprotected auxiliary power unit (APU)
power feeder wires that come into close Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
the States, on the relationship between [FR Doc. E6–20951 Filed 12–11–06; 8:45 am]
proximity to the upper surface of the
the national government and the States, auxiliary ‘‘piggy back’’ fuel tank, which BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
or on the distribution of power and could result in a potential ignition source,
responsibilities among the various and in combination with flammable fuel
levels of government. vapors, could cause a fuel tank explosion and
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:58 Dec 11, 2006 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\12DER1.SGM 12DER1