Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Laboratory 2
Hardness Testing
____________________________________
Objectives
Students are required to investigate the principle of hardness testing, i.e., Rockwell,
Brinell and Vickers hardness tests.
Students are able to compare hardness properties of various materials such as
aluminium, steel, brass and welded metals and can explain factors that might affects
their hardness properties.
Students can select appropriate macro-micro hardness testing techniques for suitable
materials-property analysis.
Students are able to analyze the obtained hardness values in relevant to the nature of
the materials to be measured and use this information as tools for selecting suitable
materials for engineering applications.
1. Literature Review
Hardness is one of the most basic mechanical properties of engineering materials. Hardness
test is practical and provide a quick assessment and the result can be used as a good indicator for
material selections. This is for example, the selection of materials suitable for metal-forming dies or
cutting tools. Hardness test is also employed for quality assurance in parts which require high wear
resistance such as gears.
The nomenclature of hardness comes in various terms depending on the techniques used for
hardness testing and also depends on the hardness levels of various types of materials. A scratch
hardness test is generally used for minerals, giving a wide range of hardness values in a Moh.s scale
at minimum and maximum values of 1 and 10 respectively. For example, talcum provides the lowest
value of 1 while diamond gives the highest of 10. The basic principle is that the harder material will
leave a scratch on a softer material. Hardness values of metals generally fall in a range of 4-8 in
Moh.s scale, which is not practical to differentiate hardness properties for engineering applications.
Therefore, indentation hardness measurement is conveniently used for metallic materials. A deeper or
wider indentation indicates a less resistance to plastic deformation of the material being tested,
resulting in a lower hardness value. The indentation techniques involve Brinell, Rockwell, Vickers
and Knoop. Different types of indenters are applied for each type. Their principles and testing
methods are mentioned as follow.
1.1 Brinell Hardness Test
Brinell hardness test was invented by J.A. Brinell in 1900 using a steel ball indenter with a 10
mm diameter. The steel ball is pressed on a metal surface to provide an impression as demonstrated
in figure 1. This impression should not be distorted and must not be too deep since this might cause
too much of plastic deformation, leading to errors of the hardness values.
Different levels of material hardness result in impression of various diameters and depths.
Therefore different loads are used for hardness testing of different materials as listed in table 1. Hard
metals such as steels require a 3,000 kgf load while brass and aluminium involve the loads of 2,000
and 1,000 kgf respectively. For materials with very high hardness, a tungsten carbide ball is utilized
to avoid the distortion of the ball.
Mechanical Metallurgy Laboratory 431303
T. Udomphol
where P
D
d
t
P
(D / 2)( D D 2 d 2 )
is
is
is
is
P
Dt
6 (1)
Note: This BHN values has a unit of kgf.mm-2 (1 kgf.mm-2 = 9.8 MPa) which cannot be
compared to the average mean pressure on the impression.
Generally, the metal surface should be flat without oxide scales or debris because these will
significantly affect the hardness values obtained. A good sampling size due to a large steel ball
diameter is advantageous for materials with highly different microstructures or microstructural
heterogeneity. Scratches or surface roughness have very small effects on the hardness values
measured. However, there are some disadvantages of Brinell hardness test. These are errors arising
Mechanical Metallurgy Laboratory 431303
T. Udomphol
from the operator themselves (from diameter measurement) and the limitation in measuring of too
small samples.
1.2 Rockwell Hardness Test
Rockwell hardness test is commonly used among industrial practices because the Rockwell
testing machine offers a quick and practical operation and can also minimize errors arising from the
operator. The depth of an indentation determines the hardness values. The indenter made of diamond
or hardened steel is pressed onto a flatly ground metal surface with a minor load of 10 kgf to position
the metal surface as shown in figure 2. The depth of the impression caused by the minor load will be
recorded onto the machine before applying a major load level according to a standard as shown in
table 2. The difference of the depths when applying the minor and the major loads indicates the
hardness value of the material. If the depth difference is small, the deformation resistance of the
metal is high, resulting in a high Rockwell hardness value. The hardness value will be displayed on a
dial or a screen, having 100 divisions and each division represents a depth of 0.002 mm.
Figure 2: Rockwell hardness measurement showing positions to apply the minor and major loads.
The Rockwell hardness units are in RA, RB and RC (or HRA, HRB, HRC), depending on
material.s hardness. Table 1 summarizes loads and types of an indenter utilized for each scale. There
are two types of indenters used, a Brale indenter (a diamond cone with an included angle of 120o) and
a steel ball indenter with its diameter varying from 1.6-3.2 mm. The applied major loads vary from
60, 100 and 150 kgf, also depending on the Rockwell hardness scale utilized. For instance, hardened
steel is tested on a Rockwell scale C using a Brale indenter and at a major load of 150 kgf. On the
Rockwell scale C, the obtained hardness values range from RC 20 B RC 70. Metals with lower
hardness are tested on a Rockwell scale B using a 1.6 mm diameter steel ball at a 100 kgf major load,
providing RB 0 B RB 100 hardness values. Rockwell scale A offers a wider range of hardness values
which can be used to test materials ranging from annealed brass to cemented carbide. Due to high
accuracy, the Rockwell hardness test is commonly conducted for measuring hardness of heat-treated
steels. Furthermore, the smaller indenter (in comparison to that of Brinell hardness test) facilitates
hardness measurement in small areas. However, this technique requires good surface preparation
since the hardness values obtained is significantly affected by rough and scratched surfaces.
There are several considerations for Rockwell hardness test
-
Scale
Indenter
Minor Load
kgf
Major Load
kgf
Diamond cone
10
50
10
90
Diamond cone
10
140
Diamond cone
10
90
10
90
10
50
10
140
10
50
10
140
10
50
10
90
10
140
10
50
10
90
10
140
Table 1: Applied loads and types of indenter used in Rockwell scale A,B and C hardness testing.
Figure 3: Vickers hardness test (a) Vickers indentation, (b) measurement of impression diagonal.
The Vickers hardness value (VHN) can be calculated from the applied load divided by areas
of indentation, at which the latter is derived from the diagonals of the pyramid as expressed in the
equation below
VHN =
where P
d
2 P sin ( / 2 ) 1.854 P
=
d2
d2
is
is
is
6 (2)
Generally, the applied load should be carefully selected to achieve a perfect square-based
pyramid indentation for accurate hardness values, see figure 4 (a). The pincushion indentation as
shown in figure 4 (b) normally observed in annealed metal results from sinking of metal surrounding
the pyramid faces. The measured diagonals would be too long, thus, giving an under-estimated
Mechanical Metallurgy Laboratory 431303
T. Udomphol
hardness value. In figure 4 (c), a barrel-shaped indentation usually achieved from cold-worked metals
provides an indentation with metal pile-up at the pyramid faces. In such a case, the measured
diagonals would be too small and lead to an over-estimated hardness value obtained.
Vickers hardness is widely used in experimental and research areas because the VHN scale
practically offers a wide range of hardness values. For instance, the VHN values range from 5 to
1,500 can be obtained from measuring materials from dead soft to full hard. This method is therefore
more convenient and provides a wider range of the hardness values in comparison to those obtained
from Rockwell and Brinell hardness tests. The applied loads vary from 1-120 kg, which depends on
the materials being tested. However, Vickers hardness test is incommonly used for company daily
checks. This is due to errors which might occur in the measurement of the diagonals and longer time
required to finish the test.
4. Results
4.1 Brinell hardness values (BHN)
Position
Aluminium
Mild steel
Brass
Position 1
Position 2
Position 3
Position 4
Position 5
Position 6
Position 7
Position 8
Position 9
Position 10
Mean
Std
Table 2: Brinell hardness values of aluminium, mild steel, brass and weld
Figure 4: Graph showing Brinell hardness values of aluminium, mild steel and brass.
Mechanical Metallurgy Laboratory 431303
T. Udomphol
Aluminium
Mild steel
Brass
Position 1
Position 2
Position 3
Position 4
Position 5
Position 6
Position 7
Position 8
Position 9
Position 10
Mean
Std
Table 3: Rockwell hardness values of aluminium, mild steel, brass and weld
Figure5: Graph showing Rockwell hardness values of aluminium, mild steel and brass.
Mechanical Metallurgy Laboratory 431303
T. Udomphol
10
Aluminium
Mild steel
Brass
Weld
Position 1
Position 2
Position 3
Position 4
Position 5
Position 6
Position 7
Position 8
Position 9
Position 10
Mean
Std
Table 4: Vickers hardness values of aluminium, mild steel, brass and the weld.
Figure 6: Graph showing Vickers hardness values of aluminium, mild steel and brass.
Mechanical Metallurgy Laboratory 431303
T. Udomphol
11
Aluminium
Mild steel
Brass
Position 1
Position 2
Position 3
Position 4
Position 5
Position 6
Position 7
Position 8
Position 9
Position 10
Mean
Std
Table 5: Micro Vickers hardness values of aluminium, mild steel, brass and weld
Figure 7: Graph showing micro Vickers hardness value of aluminium, mild steel and brass.
Mechanical Metallurgy Laboratory 431303
T. Udomphol
12
13
5. Discussion
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
14
6. Conclusions
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
15
7. Questions
7.1 Which metal does provide the highest hardness values? Why?
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
7.2 Explain why the hardness value in the welded area is different from the hardness value in
the base metal.
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
16
7.3 Compare Macro Vickers and micro Vickers hardness values obtained from the
experimental results.
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
7.4 Explain the relationship between hardness and tensile strength values.
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
17
8. References
8.1 Dieter, G.E., Mechanical metallurgy, 1988, SI metric edition, McGraw-Hill, ISBN 0-07100406-8.
8.2 Hashemi, S. Foundations of materials science and engineering, 2006, 4th edition, McGrawHill, ISBN 007-125690-3.
18