Federal Register / Vol. 73, No.
60 / Thursday, March 27, 2008 / Notices
concludes that the proposed action is
the preferred alternative.
Agencies and Persons Consulted
NRC provided a draft of this
Environmental Assessment to the
Virginia Radioactive Materials Program
for review on February 25, 2008. The
State agreed with the conclusions of the
EA, and otherwise provided no
comments.
The NRC staff has determined that the
proposed action is of a procedural
nature, and will not affect listed species
or critical habitat. Therefore, no further
consultation is required under Section 7
of the Endangered Species Act. The
NRC staff has also determined that the
proposed action is not the type of
activity that has the potential to cause
effects on historic properties. Therefore,
no further consultation is required
under Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act.
III. Finding of No Significant Impact
The NRC staff has prepared this EA in
support of the proposed action. On the
basis of this EA, the NRC finds that
there are no significant environmental
impacts from the proposed action, and
that preparation of an environmental
impact statement is not warranted.
Accordingly, the NRC has determined
that a Finding of No Significant Impact
is appropriate.
IV. Further Information
Documents related to this action,
including the application for license
amendment and supporting
documentation, are available
electronically at the NRC’s Electronic
Reading Room at http://www.nrc.gov/
reading-rm/adams.html. From this site,
you can access the NRC’s Agencywide
Document Access and Management
System (ADAMS), which provides text
and image files of NRC’s public
documents. The documents related to
this action are listed below, along with
their ADAMS accession numbers.
1. E. Lynn McGuire, Department of
Veterans Affairs, letter to Cassandra
Frazier, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Region III, dated October
22, 2007 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML072980830);
2. Regulatory Guide 1.86,
‘‘Termination of Operating Licenses for
Reactors;’’
3. Title 10 Code of Federal
Regulations, Part 20, Subpart E,
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
‘‘Radiological Criteria for License
Termination;’’
4. Title 10 Code of Federal
Regulations, Part 51, ‘‘Environmental
Protection Regulations for Domestic
VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:08 Mar 26, 2008 Jkt 214001
16327
Licensing and Related Regulatory
Functions;’’
5. NUREG–1496, ‘‘Generic
Environmental Impact Statement in
Support of Rulemaking on Radiological
Criteria for License Termination of NRC-
Licensed Nuclear Facilities;’’
6. NUREG–1757, ‘‘Consolidated
NMSS Decommissioning Guidance.’’
If you do not have access to ADAMS,
or if there are problems in accessing the
documents located in ADAMS, contact
the NRC Public Document Room (PDR)
Reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–
415–4737, or by e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov.
These documents may also be viewed
electronically on the public computers
located at the NRC’s PDR, O 1 F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, MD 20852. The PDR
reproduction contractor will copy
documents for a fee.
Dated at Lisle, Illinois, this 17th day of
March 2008.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Patrick Louden,
Chief, Decommissioning Branch, Division of
Nuclear Materials Safety, Region III.
[FR Doc. E8–6230 Filed 3–26–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50–443]
Seabrook Station, Unit No. 1;
Correction to Notice of Consideration
of Issuance of Amendment to Facility
Operating License, Proposed No
Significant Hazards Consideration
Determination, and Opportunity for a
Hearing
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of Issuance; correction.
SUMMARY: This document corrects a
notice appearing in the Federal Register
on March 19, 2008 (73 FR 14850), that
incorrectly referenced the date of the
submittal for the amendment request.
This action is necessary to correct an
erroneous date.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: G.
Edward Miller, Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001; telephone (301) 415–
2481, e-mail: GXM@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On page
14852, in the second column, in the
second complete paragraph, fourth line,
it is corrected to read from ‘‘February
16, 2007’’ to ‘‘March 7, 2008’’.
Dated in Rockville, Maryland, this 20th
day of March 2008.
PO 00000 Frm 00083 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
G. Edward Miller,
Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch 1–
2, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing,
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. E8–6237 Filed 3–26–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
POSTAL SERVICE
Change in Rates of General
Applicability for Competitive Products:
Decision of the Governors of the
Postal Service
AGENCY: Postal Service.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: This notice sets forth changes
in rates of general applicability for
competitive products.
DATES: Effective Date: May 12, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Daniel J. Foucheaux, Jr., 202–268–2989.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March
3, 2008, pursuant to their authority
under 39 U.S.C. 3632, the Governors of
the Postal Service established prices and
classification changes for competitive
products. The Governors’ Decision and
the record of proceedings in connection
with such decision are reprinted below
in accordance with § 3632(b)(2).
Implementing regulations will be
published separately in the Federal
Register.
Stanley F. Mires,
Chief Counsel, Legislative.
Decision of the Governors of the United
States Postal Service on Changes in
Rates and Classes of General
Applicability for Competitive Products
(Governors’ Decision No. 08–3)
March 4, 2008.
Statement of Explanation and
Justification
Pursuant to our authority under
section 3632 of title 39, as amended by
the Postal Accountability and
Enhancement Act of 2006 (‘‘PAEA’’), we
establish new prices of general
applicability for the Postal Service’s
competitive products, and such changes
in classifications as are necessary to
define the new prices. The prices and
classification changes are shown in
Attachment A and are described in
detail in the analysis provided by
management in Attachment B. We have
reviewed that analysis and have
evaluated the new prices and
classification changes in accordance
with 39 U.S.C. 3632–3633 and 39 CFR
3015.2. We approve the changes set
forth in Attachment A, finding that they
E:\FR\FM\27MRN1.SGM 27MRN1