Abstract: The Riemann zeta function is one of the most Leonhard Euler important and fascinating functions in mathematics. Analyzing the matter of conjecture of Riemann divide our analysis in the zeta function and in the proof of conjecture, which has consequences on the distribution of prime numbers.

© All Rights Reserved

50 vistas

Abstract: The Riemann zeta function is one of the most Leonhard Euler important and fascinating functions in mathematics. Analyzing the matter of conjecture of Riemann divide our analysis in the zeta function and in the proof of conjecture, which has consequences on the distribution of prime numbers.

© All Rights Reserved

- worksheet
- Intro Riemann Hypothesis
- The Riemann Zeros and Eigenvalue Asymptotics
- Basic Calculus
- 090610_mandelbrot
- An Analytic Generalization of the Rogers-Ramanujan Identities for Odd Moduli
- 2010 Medphyslib Ray Hashman Hashemi 2
- Lag Arias Rh
- Using Logarithms in the Real World _ BetterExplained.pdf
- Add Maths - Form 4 - Year-plan
- euclid.bams.1183555470
- Means
- EE 2012 Solved
- Permutation and Combination
- 100 Number Theory Problems
- 20140711 NSOU PG Prospectus Session July 2014
- CE07P2E_set 1_sol_final
- CalcI Complete Practice
- WEYL FRACTIONAL DERIVATIVE OF THE PRODUCT MULTIVARIABLES POLYNOMIALS AND I –FUNCTION.
- Emilio Elizalde et al- Casimir effect in rugby-ball type flux compactifications

Está en la página 1de 13

antzakouras Nikos(nikmantza@gmail.com)

August 2015 - Athens

Abstract: The Riemann zeta function is one of the most Leonhard Euler

important and fascinating functions in mathematics. Analyzing the matter

of conjecture of Riemann divide our analysis in the zeta function and in the

proof of conjecture, which has consequences on the distribution of prime

numbers.

.Introduction

#1.The Riemann Zeta Function

Let C denote the complex numbers. They form a two dimensional real vector space

spanned by 1i and where i is a fixed square root of -1, that is,

C = {x + iy : x,y R}

#2.Definition of Zeta. The Riemann zeta function is the function of a complex variable

As the equality on the second line follows from unique prime factorization, we can say that

the equation

This gives us a first example of a connection between the zeta function and the primes.[3]

Suppose A, B two subsets of the complex plane C. Each f tally the sets A and B f: A B with

the restriction that each zA corresponds one and only one point w = f (z) B, called

complex function with domain the set A and the range set B. The z called independent

variable and the dependent variable w.In cases where the above restriction does not apply,

ie where that each value of the variable zA match more than one value f (z), the f match is

called multi-valued function in contrast to the previous case where you use the term singlevalued function or simply function. If we set z = x + iy and w = u + iv, then the function w = f

(z) corresponds to each complex number zA with coordinates x and y two real numbers u

and v.In other words, the set A set of two real functions u = u (x, y) and v = v (x, y) of two

real variables x and y. So a complex function w = f (z) is equivalent to two real functions u =

u (x, y) and v = v(x, y) of two real variables.

2

2

2

2

Example.. The complex function: z ( x iy) x y 2ixy

If a complex function w = f (z) is one to one (1-1) and on (i.e. z1 z2 f (z1) f (z2) or

f (z1) = f (z2) z1 = z2 and f (A) = B), then the correlation that corresponds to each wV

that zA such that f (z) = w, defines a new function, called reverse the function f (z) and is

1

denoted by f 1 ,that is z f (w) .So if we have Zeta(z1)=Zeta(z2) z1 = z2 in the domain

#4.Extensions of holomorphic functions

One of the main properties of holomorphic functions is uniqueness in the sense that if two

holomorphic functions f and g defined in a domain G are equal on a sequence z n G ,

n

Fig..1

Of course such a property is not true for functions in real calculus. In particular, if a

holomorphic function f is de_ned in a domain G1 C and another holomorphic function g

is defined in a domain G2 C with G1 G2 0 and f = g on the intersection, then g is

determined uniquely by f; see Fig. 2.

Fig..2

f cannot be holomorphically extended beyond this disc. A simple example:

f ( z) z n , z 1

n 0

Obviously the series diverges for values z 1 . However, the function f can be

holomorphically extended to the entire complex plane C except z = 1, by the formula

A natural question appears: whether the Riemann zeta function can be holomo-rphically

extended beyond the half-plane Re s > 1? The answer is yes, which we show in two steps.

The first step is easy, the second more dificult.

Let us calculate

Fig..3

so the alternating series converges in a bigger half-plane (see Fig. 3) than the originally

defined function (s) in (3), but we have to remove s = 1 since the denominator

1 21s vanishes there. This rather easy extension of (s) from s with Re s > 1 to s with Re s >

0 is already signi_cant as it allows us to formulate the Riemann Hypothesis about the zeros

of (s) in the critical strip.

#6.Functional equations for the Riemann zeta function.

The second step, which provides a holomorphic extension for (s) from {Re s > 0, s 1 }

{Re s < 0}, see Fig. 4, was proved by Riemann in 1859.We do not give a proof here of the socalled functional equation, but the proof can be found, e.g. in the book by Titchmarsh .

Alternatively one can first holomorphically extend (s) step by step to half-planes {Re s > k,

s 1 }, where k is any negative integer. For details of this method, see for example the

papers [5] and [6].

There are few versions of the functional equation; here we formulate two of them:

where

Fig..4

Before we give more information about the function (s), we mention that each of the two

before equations , give an extension of (s) on the entire plane C except s = 1, as is

illustrated in Fig. 4.

The gamma function was already known to Euler. It generalizes the factorial n!, namely

Its basic properties are that (z) is holomorphic on the entire plane C except for the points z

= 0,-1,-2,... . At these points there are simple singularities, called poles, where we have the

limits

From the de_nition of the gamma function it is not clear that it can be extended onto the

entire plane except for z = 0,-1,-2,... , and that is non-vanishing. Fortunately there are other

equivalent de_nitions of (z) from which these properties follow more easily; see[8,9].

Namely we have

From the second formula for the gamma function we see that (z) is holomorphic and

nonvanishing for Re z > 0.

The Riemann Hypothesis is the most famous open problem in mathematics. Originally

formulated by Riemann, David Hilbert then included the conjecture on his list of the most

important problems during the Congress of Mathematicians in 1900, and recently the

hypothesis found a place on the list of the Clay Institute's seven greatest unsolved problems

in mathematics.It follows from the formula of (s) as the product that the function does not

vanish for Re s > 1.Next, using the functional equation and the fact that (z) 0 for Re z >

0, we see that (s) vanishes in the half-plane Re s < 0 only at the points where the function

sine is zero, namely we obtain...

The above considerations do not tell us about the zeros of (s) in the strip 0 <Re s < 1.

Actually there are zeros in this strip and they are called nontrivial zeros. Calculation of some

number of these nontrivial zeros shows that they are lying exactly on the line Re s = 1/2 ,

called the critical line; see Fig. 5. Now with the help of computers it is possible to calculate

Fig..5

an enormous number of zeros, currently at the level of 1013 (ten trillion). It is interesting to

mention that before the computer era began roughly in the middle of the twentieth

century, only about a thousand zeros were calculated. Of course all of these zeros are

calculated with some (high) accuracy: they are lying on the critical line. However, there is no

proof that really all nontrivial zeros lie on this line and this conjecture is called the Riemann

Hypothesis.

Riemann Hypothesis: All nontrivial zeros are on the line Re s = 1/2

Many great mathematicians have contributed to a better understanding of the Riemann

Hypothesis. There is no room to even partially list them here. Only we mention four of

them: Andr_e Weil (1906 - 1998), Atle Selberg (1917 - 2007), Enrico Bombieri (1940 ), and

Alain Connes (1947 ). The last three received the Fields Medal (in 1950, 1974, and 1982,

respectively), which is considered an equivalent to a Nobel Prize in mathematics. The

Fields Medal is awarded only to scientists under the age of forty. If someone proves the

Riemann Hypothesis and is relatively young, then they surely will receive this prize.

#8.The elementary theorems for the nontrivial zeros of (z) = 0 .

All previous constitute general theoretical knowledge that helps to prove the Hypothesis.

The essence but the proof is in 3 theorems that will develop and follow specifically in the

heorem.1 which mostly bordered the upper and lower bound of the the nontrivial zeros

roots in each case the equations of paragraph 6. Then in Theorem 2 is approached

sufficiently generalized finding method roots of Lagrange, real root of (z) = 0 ie special

Re s = 1/2.n the other theorem 3 and using imaging one to one (1-1) of Zeta Function,

calculated on exactly the premise of Conjectures. So the ability to understand the evidence

of the Hypothesis of Riemann and given step by step with the most simplest theoretical

background. But we must accept the amazing effort they achieved two researchers with

names Carles F. Pradas[1] also Kaida Shi [2] and arrived very close if not exactly with the

achievement of proof.

The non-negative

real-valued function |(s)| : C R is analytic in the critical strip.

Furthermore, on the critical line, namely when (s) = one has: |(s)| =|(1 s)|.

One has

lim

(x,y )(0,0)

|(s)| is zero in the critical strip, 0 < (s) < 1, if |(1 x iy)| = 0, with

0 < x < 1 and y R.

Lemma 2. (Criterion to know whether a zero is on the critical line).

Let s0 x0 iy0 be a zero of |(s)| with 0 < (s0) < 1. Then s 0 belongs to the critical line if

| (s) |

1 is satisfied.

ss 0 | (1 - s) |

condition lim

Proof. If s is a zero of |(s)|, the results summarized in Lemma 1 in order to prove whether

| (s) |

1 In fact

ss 0 | (1 - s) |

since | f(s)| = | (s) | / | (1- s) | and |f(s)| is a positive function in the critical strip,

it follows that when s0 is a zero of |(s)|, one should have | (s 0 ) | / | (1 - s 0 ) | = 0/0 but

| (s) |

| f(s 0 ) | .

ss 0 | (1 - s) |

| (s) |

1 is

On the other hands |f(s)| = 1 on the critical line, hence when condition lim

ss 0 | (1 - s) |

satisfied, the zero s 0 belongs to the critical line.

also | (s 0 ) | / | (1 - s) | | f(s 0 ) | .In other words one should have lim

Theorem 1.

For the non- trivial zeroes of the Riemann Zeta Function (s) apply

i) Exist upper-lower bound of Re s of the Riemann Zeta Function (s) and more

Ln 2

Ln

,

specifically the closed space

.

Ln 2 Ln 2

ii) The non-trivial zeroes Riemann Zeta function (s) of upper-lower bound distribute

symmetrically on the straight line Re s=1/2.

iii) THE AVERAGE value of upper lower bound of Re s=1/2.

iv) If we accept the non- trivial zeroes of the Riemann Zeta Function (s) as

t k 1 t k

2k

, k, n N .

Ln (n)

Proof ..

i) Here we formulate two of the functional equations

We look at each one individually in order to identify and set of values that we want each

time ..

a. For the first equation and for real values with Re s>0 and if take logarithm of 2 parts of

equation then we have

Log[Cos(s / 2)(s)] 2ki

but solving for s and if f ( s) Cos(s / 2)(s) and from Lemma 2 if

s s0

s s0

Log [ f ( s )] 2ki

Log [2] Log [ f ( s)] 2ki

0

with

Log [2 ]

Log [2 ]

Log [2 ]

Log [2]

0.3771 .This is the lower

Log [2 ]

bound which gives us, the first of Riemann Zeta Function of (s).

b.For the second equation for real values with Re s<1 and if take logarithm of 2 parts of

equation then we have

Log[Sin(s / 2)(1 s)] 2ki

but solving for s and if f ( s) Sin(s / 2)(1 s) and from Lemma 2

if lim ( s) / (1 s) 1 or Log[ lim ( s) / (1 s)] 0 we get

s s0

s s0

Log [ f ( s )] 2ki

Log [ ] Log [ f ( s)] 2ki

0

with

Log [2 ]

Log [2 ]

Log [2 ]

Log [ ]

0.62286 .This is the upper

Log [2 ]

bound which gives us, the second of Riemnn Zeta Function of (s). So we see that exists the

lower and upper bound for Re s and is well defined.

ii) Assuming s k low it k and s upper it k with low

Log [ ]

Log [2]

and upper

Log [2 ]

Log [2 ]

Re s Re s 1 / 2 upper 1 / 2 0.1228

Re s k 1 / 2 Re s k 1 / 2 low 0.1228

Then this suggests our absolute symmetry around from the middle value is Re s 1 / 2 ,

generally as shown in Figure 6

Fig. 6

iii) THE AVERAGE value of upper lower bound is Re s=1/2 because

Re s 1 / 2

1/ 2

Log [2 ]

iv)If we accept the non-trivial zeroes of the Riemann Zeta Function (s) as s 1 0 it1 and

s 2 0 it 2 with s1 s2 ,

suppose that the real coordinate 0 of each non-trivial zero of the Riemann Zeta, [2]

function (s ) corresponds with two imaginative coordinates t1 and t2 , then, we have

folloing equation group:

where

=0

Enable above expression equals to zero, we must have

so, we obtain

Theorem 2.

For real part of non-trivial zeroes Riemann Zeta function (s), the upper-lower bound

converge in line Re s=1/2, then solving the 2 equations of the Riemann zeta functions.

Proof..

Using the Generalized theorem of Lagrange (GRLE),[7] to solve an equation attempt to

bring the equation in such form, as to give us the limit of the roots, which converge on one

number. Taking advantage of the method, we develop resolve in 2 parts to show the

convergence as a number, using the two equations of the Riemann zeta functions .

For real values with Re s>0 and if take logarithm of 2 parts of equation[7] then we have

Log[Sin(s / 2)(1 s)] 2ki

the correlation theory we ill have after using Lemma 2 ie.. Log[ lim ( s) / (1 s)] 0 and

s s0

2ik y

With yLog[] and total form

Log [2 ]

With q is the count of repetitions of the Sum(). We very simply with a language

mathematica to calculate with data q=25,and we get the program.

In():Clear[k,q,y]

k := 1; q := 25; t := (Log[]);

s = N[(2 I k + y)/(Log[2] + Log[])] +

q

Gamma w

w 1

1 Log 2

Log Sin

y, w

2I

Log 2

Log

Log Gamma 1

2I

Log 2

Log

N[1 - 2^(FQ)*()^(FQ - 1)*Sin[*FQ/2]*Gamma[1 - FQ]]

Out(): 0.500006 +3.43623 I

-3.71908*10-6-6.00526*10-6 I

Schematically illustrate get fig 7 with program mathematica

Clear [z];

f=Log[1-z]/Log[z]-2*(2*)^(-z)*Cos[*z/2]*Gamma[z];ContourPlot[{Re[f/.z->x+I y]==0,Im[f/.z->x+I

y]==0},{x,-15,15},{y,-10,10},ContourStyle->{Red,Blue}]

10

10

15

10

10

15

Fig 7

b)Solve of second equation

For real values with Re s<1 and if take logarithm of 2 parts of equation then we have

Log[Cos(s / 2)(s)] 2ki

the correlation theory we ill have after using Lemma 2 ie.. Log[ lim (1 s) / ( s)] 0 and

s s0

2ik y

With yLog[2] and total form

Log [2 ]

With q is the count of repetitions of the Sum(). Similarly forming the program a language

mathematica to calculate with data q=25,we have.

In():k := 1; q := 25; t := -Log[2];

S =-(2 I k + y)/Log[2]

+

q

1 w

Gamma w

w 1

w 1

y

2I

1

Log 2

Log Cos

Log 2

Log

2I

Log Gamma

Log 2

Log

N[1 - 2*(2*)^(-FQ)*Cos[*FQ/2]*Gamma[FQ]]

Out(): 0.499994 -3.43623 I, -3.71908*10-6-6.00526*10-6 I

Schematically illustrate get fig 8 with program mathematica

Clear [z];f=Log[z]/Log[1-z]-2^z*()^(z-1)*Sin[*z/2]*Gamma[1-z];ContourPlot[{Re[f/.z->x+I y]==0,

Im[f/.z->x+I y]==0},{x,-15,15},{y,-10,10},ContourStyle->{Red,Blue}]

10

10

15

10

Fig.8

10

15

With this analysis as we see the lower and upper limit converge in value Re s=1/2, what we

want results which proves the theorem2.

Theorem 3.

The Riemann Hypothesis states that the nontrivial zeros of (s) have real part equal to 1/2.

Proof

Constant Hypothesis (s)=0.

In this case we use the 2 equations of the Riemann zeta functions, so if they apply what

they represent the (s) and (1-s) to equality.

BEFORE We developed the method make three assumptions:

i)

a)For z C

1. { a z 0 a 0 Re z 0 }

2. { a z 1 a 0 z 0 }

which It refers to the inherent function similar in two Riemann zeta functions as

(2 ) z 0 or (2 ) z 1 0 and it seems they do not have roots in C-Z because (2 ) 0 .

b)For all z C Z true the form Gamma( z ) Gamma(1 z )

.

Sinz

From this form resulting that Gamma(z)=0 or Gamma(1-z)=0 dont has roots in C-Z.

c)Sin(/2z)=0 or Cos(/2z)=0

More specifically if z=x+yi then

1. Sin( / 2 z ) 0 Cosh[( y)/2]Sin[( x)/2] I Cos[( x)/2]Sinh[( y)/2] 0

Has solution

of the generalized solution seems that the pairs (x, y) will always arise integers which makes

impossible the case is 0 <x <1, therefore it has not roots the equation Sin(/2z)=0

2. Cos( / 2 z ) 0 Cosh[( y)/2]Sin[( x)/2] I Cos[( x)/2]Sinh[( y)/2] 0

Has solution

as we can see again of the generalized solution seems that the pairs (x, y) will always arise

integers which makes impossible the case is 0 <x <1, therefore it has not roots the equation

Cos(/2z)=0.

With these three cases exclude the case one of these three equations to zero for z=x+yi

And be valid concurrently 0<x<1, because x in Z.

ii)

Therefore analyze the two equations of the Riemann zeta functions and try to find

common solutions

1.For the first equation and for real values with Re s>0 apply..

(1 s) / ( s) 2(2 ) s Cos(s / 2)( s) (1 s) f ( s) ( s)

,where f ( s) 2(2 ) s Cos(s / 2)( s) but this means that occur two cases

a. (1 s) (s) ,s complex number.

With this assumption implies that ( s)(1 f ( s)) 0 ( s) 0 .In Theorem 1, iv we

showed that the function (s) is 1-1 and if (xo+yi)=(xo+yi) then y=y and xo=xo ,but also

appy that (xo+yi)=(xo-yi)=0. The form (1 s) (s) means if s=xo+yi that (1-xo)=xo

namely xo=1/2 because in this case will be verified

(1 xo yi) (1/ 2 yi) (1/ 2 yi) 0 and like that verified the definition of any

complex equation. Therefore if s=xo+iy then xo=1/2 to verify the equation (s) 0 .

b. (1 s) (s) ,s complex number.

The case for this to be verified should (s) (1 s) f (s) (s) 0 f (s) 0 .But

this case is not possible because, as we have shown in Section i, the individual functions of

f (s) is not zero for s complex number.

2.For the second equation and for real values with Re s<1 apply..

( s) / (1 s) 2(2 ) s 1 Sin(s / 2)(1 s) ( s) f ( s) (1 s) ,where

f ( s) 2(2 ) s 1 Sin(s / 2)(1 s) but this means also that occur two cases

a. (1 s) (s) ,s complex number.

This case is equivalent to 1.a, and therefore if s=xo+iy then xo=1/2 to verify the equation

( s) 0 .

b. (1 s) (s) ,s complex number.

Similarly, the case is equivalent to 1.b and therefore can not be happening, as proven.

References

[1]. Carles F. Pradas Azimut S. I.Barcelona

[2]. A Geometric Proof of Riemann Hypothesis,Kaida Shi

[3]. An Exploration of the Riemann Zeta Function and its

Applic.to the Theory of Prime Number Distribution,

Elan Segarra

[4].R. Dwilewicz and J. Min,The Hurwitz zeta function as a

convergent series. Rocky Mountain J. Math. 36 (2006),

[5].G. Everest, C. Rottger and T. Ward, The continuing story

of zeta.The Math. Intelligencer 31 (2009)

[6].T.M. Apostol, Introduction to Analytic Number Theory.

Springer -Verlag, New York - Heidelberg - Berlin 1976.

[7].Solve Polynomials and Transcetental equations use

Mathematica, Mantzakouras Nikos 2014

[8].RobertE, Green and StevenG,Krantz,Fuction Theory

of One Complex variables

[9].Elias M.Stein and Rami Shakarchi; Complex Analysis

Prinseton 2007

[10].L.Ahlfors, Complex An. 3rd Edition, McGraw Hill, NY 1979:

- worksheetCargado porabhijeetaggarwal
- Intro Riemann HypothesisCargado porthecatalan
- The Riemann Zeros and Eigenvalue AsymptoticsCargado porparanoid923
- Basic CalculusCargado porriee
- 090610_mandelbrotCargado porZerohedge
- An Analytic Generalization of the Rogers-Ramanujan Identities for Odd ModuliCargado porapi-26401608
- 2010 Medphyslib Ray Hashman Hashemi 2Cargado porGiovanni Valer
- Lag Arias RhCargado porCristhyan Naranjo
- Using Logarithms in the Real World _ BetterExplained.pdfCargado porkamayani_pr
- Add Maths - Form 4 - Year-planCargado porFikrah Imayu
- euclid.bams.1183555470Cargado porsemnan
- MeansCargado porMys Tique
- EE 2012 SolvedCargado porrpshvju
- Permutation and CombinationCargado poranji891
- 100 Number Theory ProblemsCargado porcheetah17
- 20140711 NSOU PG Prospectus Session July 2014Cargado porKoushik Ray
- CE07P2E_set 1_sol_finalCargado porapi-3858963
- CalcI Complete PracticeCargado porBryce Reaver Arnold
- WEYL FRACTIONAL DERIVATIVE OF THE PRODUCT MULTIVARIABLES POLYNOMIALS AND I –FUNCTION.Cargado porIJAR Journal
- Emilio Elizalde et al- Casimir effect in rugby-ball type flux compactificationsCargado porTurmav12345
- Using Logarithmic GraphsCargado porAC
- CHAPTER_1_TEST(9-8-10)Cargado porAni Coca Kolla
- Blank Quiz (Responses)Cargado porCyrah mae
- Rate relationsCargado porjosedrock0
- frames_mf asdfg asdfgCargado porGabriel Bejan
- Ch11.Supplement MaterialCargado porcarbon89
- limovitosfssCargado porkral
- 04.04.09Cargado porMegha Srivastava
- ttCargado porAdrian Camacho
- WCE2010_pp2091-2095Cargado poririnuca12

- zetazerosCargado porNikos Mantzakouras
- FERMAT_LAST_THEOREM_-_PROOF (1).pdfCargado porNikos Mantzakouras
- 0206240Cargado porNikos Mantzakouras
- Introduction to Mathematical Thinking - Devlin, KeithCargado porAmaury Guillermo Baez
- Twin PrimesCargado porNikos Mantzakouras
- The Foundations of Celestial MechanicsCargado porEmisa Rista
- 1006.1133.pdfCargado porNikos Mantzakouras
- Fig 15 LCargado porNikos Mantzakouras
- Solve EquationsCargado porNikos Mantzakouras
- 1-s2.0-S0022314X12000261-mainCargado porNikos Mantzakouras
- Trans Ce DentalCargado porNikos Mantzakouras
- BE IntegralsCargado porNikos Mantzakouras
- Method of Solve Equations(In Greek)Cargado porNikos Mantzakouras
- The 2 Goldbach ConjectureCargado porNikos Mantzakouras
- 1-s2.0-S0022314X13001923-mainCargado porNikos Mantzakouras
- 1-s2.0-S0001870812001600-mainCargado porNikos Mantzakouras
- Brocard ConjectureCargado porNikos Mantzakouras
- Beal ConjectureCargado porNikos Mantzakouras
- 1103.6226Cargado porNikos Mantzakouras
- 1103.6226.pdfCargado porNikos Mantzakouras
- 1401.6959Cargado porNikos Mantzakouras
- Ringe Kutta ChebyshevapproximantCargado porNikos Mantzakouras
- InverseLogIntegral RGCargado porNikos Mantzakouras
- 00 Anewspecialfunctionanditsapplicationtoprobability MainCargado porNikos Mantzakouras
- Proof RiemannCargado porNikos Mantzakouras

- One and Two Way ANOVACargado porDave Millington
- view (1)Cargado porHendri Sulistiawan
- Guidelines - MMS -Project IV SemCargado porSandeshh Nalavade
- 5_3gh gg gggCargado porkazi wahex
- Analisis KriyingCargado porIrving
- RBE Plus Information Brochure UsCargado porsnifvn
- Branding RoleCargado porKruh Kwabena Isaac
- PP Pe Implant articolCargado porAliceRusu
- Working Design of Single AnglesCargado porAnonymous 1BdR0EQgbu
- Chap.1Cargado porJohanna Shin
- TT_00051000053Cargado porBui Hoang Giang
- 2_Alfirevic_Gabelica (1).docCargado porKatarinaKlobučar
- Fox News National Poll Trump v ClintonCargado porThe Conservative Treehouse
- Model Non Normal DataCargado porqualipalha
- Community Health Counts: Sinai Community Health Survey 2017Cargado porSteve Warmbir
- WHA4925 EngCargado porPostelnicu Dan
- Statistical Usefulness of the EU FADN Database for Production Cost Estimations 76pCargado porKjfhgd
- HMCost3e_SM_Ch03.docCargado porAnna Antonio
- 10.1.1.172Cargado porKhurram Khan
- Sample Qual Linear AlgCargado porAtif Imam
- 01 Econometrics - OverviewCargado porFakhrana Nur Hanifati
- 3 01 notesCargado porapi-316587316
- 8426672Cargado porNeeta Joshi
- PROJECT REPORT FORMAT GUIDELINESCargado porSamuel Mj
- Branding ProposalCargado porDanang Wijaya
- Natural Rubber: Its Constraints in foothills of Siang Region, Arunachal PradeshCargado porEditor IJTSRD
- 2017 Towards Sustainable Clothing Disposition Exploring the Consumer Choice to Use Trash as a Disposal OptionCargado porCecilia CeciCeci
- Panel DataCargado porsaeed meo
- Article1379409299_Adeniyi Et AlCargado porBeatrix Jaica L
- MSK Consultants and Engineers-QS Job DescriptionCargado porBhaskar Babi