Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
1857-1862, 1994
Copyright 0 1994 Ekvier Scieaa Ltd.
Printedin Great Britain.All I&MSreserved
00%4686/94 $7.03 + 0.00
0013-4686(94)E0107-B
COMNINELLIS
24 September
1993; accepted
28 October
1993)
Abstrsti-The electrochemical oxidation (or combustion) of organ& with simultaneous oxygen evolution has been investigated using different electrode material (Pt, Ti/lrO,, Ti/SnO,). A simplified mechanism for the electrochemical oxidation or combustion of organics is presented according to which
selective oxidation occurs with oxide anodes (MO,) forming the so-called higher oxide MO,,, and
combustion occurs with electrodes at the surface oflwhich dH radicals are accumulated. Detection of
OH radicals formed by water discharge at different anodes using N,Ndimethyl-p-nitrosoaniline (RNO)
as a spin trap and preparative electrolysis confirm the proposed mechanism.
Key
words:
1. INTRODUCTION
[NON-BIO]
Ckmvcrsion
Biolop.
[BIO] -CO,
trc.tm.
+
biomass.
1857
CH. COMNINELLIS
1858
of
2. MECHANISM OF THE
ELECTROCHEMICAL
CONVERSION/COMBUSTION
OF
ORGANICS WITH SIMULTANEOUS
OXYGEN EVOLUTION
conversion/combustion
+ H+ + e. (1)
H++c
MOx(OH)
MO,+,
H++c-
Fig. 1. Generalized
schema
of the electrochemical
conversion[6]/combustion[!j]
of organics with simultaneous oxygen evolution[3, 41: (1) H,O discharge; and (2)
transition of 0 from OH to the lattice of the oxide anode.
2M8/0,
MO,(OH), -
R + MO,+,
k.
-RO+MO,.
(6)
k,C 1% k,CMO,l,
(7)
where :
= electrochemical rate constant for H,O discharge;
k2
= electrochemical rate constant for transition of oxygen into oxide lattice;
[MO,] = concentration of active sites on the oxide
anode; and
Cl
= concentration of oxygen vacancies in the
oxide lattice.
k,
1859
of
selective
oxidation
rate of O2 evolution
MO,+ I = kAYI,
by
of
organics =
decomposition
of
where :
= stoichiometry factor for selective oxidation;
= rate constant for the selective oxidation of
organics, equation (6);
= rate constant for 0, evolution, equation (4);
k,
[0] = steady state concentration of active oxygen
in the oxide lattice; and
[R], = concentration of organics at a given time, t.
k,CRI,
Z, k,CJU+ kc,
4
(8)
k,CMO,I,> k2[ 1.
Thus efficient oxide anodes for combustion
of
organics must have a large number of active sites for
the adsorption of hydroxyl radicals and must have a
very low concentration of oxygen vacancies in the
oxide lattice.
Oxides in which the oxidation state of the cation
is the highest possible and/or which contains an
excess oxygen in the oxide lattice (this can be
achieved for example by doping the oxide with
another metal oxide in which the oxidation state is
higher than the base oxide) can be considered as
oxides (or mixture of oxides) at the surface of which
the hydroxyl radicals are accumulated and favour
the combustion of organics.
The current efficiency for the combustion of
organics depends on the relative rate of combustion
of organics, equation (5), to the rate of oxygen evolution (side reaction) by discharge of the adsorbed
hydroxyl radicals, equation (3):
rate of combustion of organics = Z, kJOH][R],
,
rate of 0, evolution by discharge of OH =
WOW,
where :
ZC
z, kCR1,
ZckCRl,
+ k,
(10)
Since the organic hydroperoxides formed are relatively unstable, decomposition of such intermediates
often leads to molecular breakdown and formation
of subsequent intermediates
with lower carbon
numbers. These scission reactions continue rapidly
until the formation of carbon dioxide and water.
3. EXPERIMENTAL
DETAILS
1860
CH. COMNINELLIS
in
+ OH + R-NO
OH
3.1.1. Electrolytic cell and measuring method. A
two-compartment
cell of 50ml capacity was used,
the anode was in the form of plate (4cm*) and the
cathode was a platinum spiral enclosed in a lOm1
porous porcelain pot; stirring was provided by a
magnetic bar. The anodic compartment
contains
also a Fiber-optic
spectrophotometer
(Guide wave,
Inc. Model 260) for the measure of the bleaching of
RN0 at 440nm during constant current electrolysis
with different electrodes. Owing to the large extinction coefficient of RN0 (in neutral and alkaline
solution) it was possible to measure accurately very
small changes in concentration.
The screening test of
anodes has been carried out in phosphate
buffer
(pH = 7.1) containing 2 x 10m5 moldme
RNO. All
experiments were done at room temperature (25C).
In order to study the OH radical reaction with
phenol (PhOH), studies were carried out at pH9
(Na,B,O,
solution) in the presence of both, RN0
and PhOH in the electrolyte.
Under these conditions,
RN0 and PhOH are
simple competition reactions for OH radicals:
koH
RN0
PhOH
For competitive
+ OH -
kom
+ OH -product.
reactions
product,
Go
(PhOH)
(RNO)
10- Uo,),
IO
where:
= electrolysis current; and
Ir,,), = partial current for 0, evolution
time, t.
at a given
Two methods have been used for the determination of the partial current for 0, evolution; the
Oxygen Flow Rate (OFR) method (in which the
oxygen flow rate was measured during electrolysis)
and the Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) method
(in which the Chemical Oxygen Demand was measured during electrolysis). From the ICE-t curve, the
average current efficiency (defined as the Electrochemical Oxidation
Index, EOI) and the Electrochemical Oxygen Demand (EOD) can be calculated.
Details concerning these methods are given in a previous paperf61.
3.2.2. kectiode material, electrochemical cell and
analvsis. The Ti/IrO, electrode was oreoared bv the
thermal decomposition
technique which consists of
the following steps: dissolution in isopropanol of the
coating components;
varnish application
on the
pretreated titanium base by brush; drying at 80C;
thermal decomposition;
cooling and repeating the
above operations
until the desired amount of the
coating is reached, finally post-heat
treatment
for
1 h. Many more details concerning
electrode preparation and characterization
are given elsewhere[l&
163.
The SnO, film electrodes doped with Sb were prepared on titanium base metal by Stucki by the standard spray hydrolysis method; the best composition
of the spray solution found by Stucki was log SnCI,
x SH,O, 0.1 g SbCl, in lOOm1 of ethanol; details of
the preparation are given elsewhere[ 171.
A two compartment
cell of 150ml capacity was
used; the anode was made of Pt, Ti/IrO,
or
Ti/SnO, , and the cathode was a platinum spiral
enclosed in a 10 ml porous porcelain pot; stirring
was provided by a magnetic bar.
The disappearance
of phenol and the appearance
of its oxidation products were monitored by HPLC
(Shimazu 8A). The progress of the electrochemical
oxidation
was monitored
by measuring
the Total
Oxygen Carbon (TOC, XERTEX, Dohrman)
and
the Chemical
Oxygen Demand
(COD, Hach Dr
2000).
The oxygen formed in the anolyte during electrolysis was measured by a gas burette and analysed by
gas chromatography.
1 (11)
where :
G(-RNO)
AND DISCUSSION
I
372
30
[PhOH)/[RNO]
Fig 3. Determination of the rate constant between phenol
and OH radicals at pH 9 using equation (11). NB : The rate
constant between RN0 + OH has been taken as
1.2 x lOM-s-t.
436
A,
Fig. 2. Adsorption spectra of aqueous RN0 solution (2 x 10-smoldm-3)
during 2 h galavanostatic electrolysis with different anode material:
T = 25C.
nm
obtained at 5min intervals
i = 20rnAcn1-~; pH = 7.1;
1862
CH.
COMNINELLIS
20
40
60
80
100
Ah dm-
Fig. 4. Evolution of: (1) phenol; (2) aromatic intermediates;
(3) aliphatic acids; and (4) CO, during the electrochemical
oxidation
of phenol
at Pt anode:
i = 50mAcm-*,
T = 70C. pH = 2 (const). NB: The progress of electrolysis
is expressed in specific electrical charge (Ahdm-s)
and all
concentrations are expressed in mg Cl-.
donating
(-NH,, -OH) which increase the
reactivity of the benzene derivates and are oxidized
with high current effkiency[5]. These results are in
concordance with those expected using relation 8
(the influence of pH can be explained by the fact that
the phenate ion is much more reactive than phenol).
Analysis of the oxidation products during electrolysis of phenol at platinum anode[6] shows that oxidation occurs in two steps: in the first step aromatic
intermediates
(hydroquinone,
catechol,
benzoquinone) are formed and in the second step
aromatic ring opening occurs with the formation of
muconic acid which is further oxidized to C4 and C,
aliphatic acids (maleic, fumaric and oxalic acid) these
acids are stable toward further oxidation. Figure 4
shows the evolution of phenol, aromatic intermediates and aliphatic acids (expressed in mgC l- )
during the electrochemial oxidation of phenol at Pt
anode; the amount of CO* (mg C l- ) also formed is
given in the same figure.
4.2.2. Combustion of organics. The electrochemical
oxidation of phenol has been studied using SnO,
anodes[8]. Analysis of the oxidation products during
electrolysis has shown that aliphatic acids (fumaric,
maleic, oxalic) are the main intermediate products
which are further oxidized to CO? (combustion).
electron
20
40
60
80
100
Ah dmm3
Fig. 5. Evolution of: (1) phenol; (2) aromatic intermediates;
(3)
. , alinhatic acids; and (4) CO, during the electrochemical
oxidaiion of phenol at thk Sn6* anode: for conditions see.
Fig. 4.
REFERENCES
1. E. Plattner and Ch. Comninellis, in Process Technologiesfor Water Treatment (Edited by S. Stucki), p. 205.
Plenum, New York (1988).
2. 0. J. Murrphy, G. D. Hitchens, L. Kaba and C. E.
Verostrko, Wat. Res. 26,443 (1992).
3. S. Stucki, R. K&z, B. Carter and W. Suter, J. appl.
Electrochem. 21.99 (1991).
4. R. Parsons and T. Qander-Noot, J. electroanal. Chem.
257,9 (1988).
5. Ch. Comninellis and E. Plattner, Chimia 42, 250 (1988).
6. Ch. Comninellis and C. Pulgarin, J. appl. Electrochem.
21, 1403 (1991).
7. Ch. Comninellis, Gas, Wasser, Abwasser 11, 792 (1992).
8. Ch. Comninellis and C. Pulgarin, J. appl. Electrochem.
23, 108 (1993).
9. K. I. Rosenthal and V. I. Veselovkii, Dokl. Akad. Nauk
SSR 111,637 (1956).
10. D. D. Eley, H. Pines and P. B. Weisz, Advances in
Catalysis, ?ol. 38, p. 1. Academic, New York (1992).
11. V. D. Sokolovkii. Catal. Rev. Sci. Ena. 32, 1 (1990).
12. W. Bors, M. S&an, E. Lengfelde~, Ch. Michel, Ch.
Fuchs and Ch. Frenzel, Photo&em. Photobiol. 28, 629
(1978).
13. I. Kvaljic and C. N. Trumbore, J. Am. hem. Sot. 20,
2547 (1965).
14. D. Wabner and C. Grambow, J. electroanal. Chem. 195,
95 (1985).
15. Ch. Comninellis and G. P. Vercesi, J. appl. Electrochem.
21, 335 (1991).
16. G. P. Vercesi, J. Y. Salamin and Ch. Comninellis, Electrochem. Acta 36,991 (1991).
17. R. KBtz, S. Stucki and B. Carter, J. appl. Electrochem.
21, 14 (1991).
18. R. S. Shetiya, K. N. Rao and J. Shankar, Indian J.
Chem. 14A, 575 (1976).