Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
ABSTRACT
There is a growing body of work on popular culture in Africa that has
focused on the eclectic production of culture on the continent. However,
very little attention has been paid to the rising significance of the Internet
as a site of production for these popular cultures. Existing scholarship on
Internet usage and production on the continent has tended to focus on
issues of lack, whether it is about access, literacy, or usage, which though
important, has muted the much more vibrant set of activities by Africans
online. In this article, I argue that by locating the Internet as an alternative site of production for popular culture, it becomes possible to begin to
explore the myriad meanings of online activities that reference the social
and political lives of their users. It is in such a venture that one can begin to
explore the impact and significance of the Internet in transforming how we
read popular culture in Africa. I explore the meanings of selected Internet
texts circulated in the "Kenyan blogosphere," arguing that the Internet
provides alternative routes of expression of popular culture, bringing to
the fore aspects of social and political lives and ideas that would otherwise
have remained hidden from public discourse.
DINA LIGAGA 3
Kenya as existing not only in opposition to mainstream media, but also as independent practices to it. Historically, both print and broadcast mainstream media,
were long seen as tools for articulating state power in the public and private lives of
Kenyans. As such, censorship and self-censorship aided in constricting spaces of
expression for ordinary Kenyans, whose opinions often had to be filtered through
strict editorial practices that were shaped around the authoritarian rule of the
reigning president. Consistently, media forms and art that existed in opposition
to state-centric agendas were quickly squashed and pushed aside, in most cases
never to be heard of again. In a space where public discourse was so heavily mediated, popular culture became the only existing alternative means through which
power could be challenged. As George Ogola has argued, although Kenya was
under authoritarian rule for most of its post-independence history, "there was a
thriving oppositional counterculture that found space" within and, in most cases,
outside mainstream media (126).
This counterculture has been well documented in a growing body of work
on Kenyan popular culture. Consistently, several of these scholars have shown
that popular culture in Kenya has grown not just in opposition to power, but as
a record of the everyday that shows how people managed to live in spaces and
conditions that were not always conducive to their lives. It demonstrates how
Kenyans found agency in avenues that were oppressive. Thus Tom Odhiambo's
study of Kenyan popular fiction highlights accounts of ordinary men and women
who strive to exist in the bleak city spaces of post-independence Kenya, just like
Bodil Frederiksen shows the meanings and processes of reception of everyday
forms such as soap operas and magazines in the working-class spaces in Nairobi
slums. These studies signal interesting ways in which Kenyans have innovatively
found alternative avenues to express themselves and engage with their realities
in spite of the contexts of their existence. Indeed, it is such emphasis on the banal
that allows for studies of popular culture's intersections with power. Grace Musila
for instance, demonstrates how the cartoon form in Kenya has constantly challenged the meanings of power through humor ("Democrazy"). She engages with
how it has become a potent discursive site for engaging with the absurdities of
authoritarian rule in Kenya. This constant teasing out of issues that are important
to ordinary Kenyans lends popular cultures their characteristic ability to "shed
their pleasures and becomethrough the uses to which they are put and through
judgments made of themforms of political practice" (Ogola 125). As Ogude and
Nyairo show, "popular cultural and narrative forms are particularly excellent sites
for understanding complex issues of power, especially in authoritarian societies
where many people lack access to forums of political debate" (1).
The idea of the popular in Kenya is therefore historically linked to power in
a context where Kenyans existed on a staple of mediated information and where
ideas of "truth" and newsworthy information were circulated mainly through
print and reiterated in broadcast media. Public information was always controlled
by those in whose interest it was to remain in the good books of the state. The
state, for its part, depended on mainstream media to build its identity and kept
a close watch on its various activities. This arrangement quite obviously meant
that the ordinary Kenyan was heavily policed and that anything that was deemed
subversive or that had the potential to undermine the nation-state would be edited
out of public discourse. In this context, the printed word had legitimacy as truth.
DINA LIGAGA *
users. One such role of the Internet is its ability to accommodate the circulation of
syncretic forms online. An example of this is the extremely popular Makmende
phenomenon that spread through the Internet in 2010 (Mathenge; Mwaniki;
Gaitho), Makmende was an imaginary Kenyan hero, named by the Kenyan musical group Just a Band, and was featured in their video for "Ha-He," In the video
(available on YouTube), Makmende fights bad guys and restores peace in a "tough"
neighborhood. Upon the release of the video in 2010, the character Makmende
quickly went viral, with different Kenyans posting quips about him. Soon he
became a larger than life phenomenon that was being celebrated for his superpowers in clever one-liners. The response to Makmende was so huge that the website
makmende.com (which has unfortunately since been deleted) became dedicated
to it. Examples of the creative quips about Makmende included the ones below:
After eating garlic Makmende doesn't smell like garlic but garlic smells like
Makmende,
Makmende can look at your photo and know you are lying.
Nobody knows what would happen if Chuck Norris and Makmende met, but
one thing is for sure: Makmende would still be standing.
Always look before you leap. Unless Makmende is chasing you. Then you had
better just jump,
Makmende refused a syringe at a blood bank. Instead, he asked for a gun and
a bucket,
Makmende found Bin Laden, Let him go, and found him again for his own
amusement,
Makmende doesn't drink honey. He chews bees,
Makmende doesn't have nightmares. Nightmares have Makmende, (Olang)
Quite truthfully, the idea of Makmende is not original. Like other mmes before
it, such as those about American heroes Jack Bauer from the television program
24 and Chuck Norris, the Makmende phenomenon began with a heroic character
in a video who always successfully defeated the bad/tough guys and seemed
invincible. The possibility of this hero, however, grew and became larger than
life almost overnight. The interesting ways in which the Makmende phenomenon
grew is indicative of the level of creativity by Kenyans online.
Among other things, Makmende revealed that as a popular culture form,
it could borrow from existing popular forms and morph into something that it
was not before. Thus Makmende drew equally from the film genre of Blaxploitation as from the street cultures of Nairobi of the 1980s and 1990s, Blaxploitation
films (such as Shaft) typically were crime dramas set in urban locations that used
spectacle and sensation to exhibit violence, sex, and other forms of visual excesses
(Howell), They were also expressions of black hyper-masculinity or, in the case of
the heroines, stereotypes of highly daring, sexualized women. Drawing from this
genre, Makmende presents a character at once familiar and alien, local and foreign.
Onyango-Obbo's observation points to a deeper political story in Kenya of corruption, dictatorship, and lack of transparency. It also shows how Makmende came
to be seen as a representative of change in a war between the people and power.
The Makmende phenomenon, though short-lived, was a powerful way through
which Kenyans suspended their differences in order to express their joys as well
as their frustrations.
The example of Makmende above enables one to begin a discussion of how
Kenyans use the Internet to deal with difficult questions regarding their political
and social lives. In the following section, I will discuss more explicit engagements
with politics by Kenyans online. I begin by arguing that in a context where the
political elite had control of important avenues of communication, the entry of the
Internet provided space for politicians to be critiqued, ridiculed, and dismissed
DINALIGAGA 7
in a way not previously possible. Rather than use the same language as the mainstream media in presenting political events and politicians, most Internet users
adopted a different style of communication. As Barber points out, "more usually
.. . people's disillusion and resentment is expressed in a more subterranean manner, in the form of jokes, catchphrases, and anecdotes that circulate with great
rapidity and undergo many phases of elaboration while they are in vogue" ("Popular Arts in Africa" 5). The manner in which Kenyan Internet users communicate
with each other and how they frame their ideas is therefore vital in uncovering
their attitudes and their responses to power. I draw my examples from the discussion forum of the popular website mashada.com and argue that it is only through
reading the patterns of users' communications that one can begin to uncover "real
experiences, attitudes, and responses to power" (ibid. 3).
Founded in 1999 by David Kobia to serve the increasingly computer literate
members of the Kenyan diaspora, mashada.com is considered one of the population's largest online bulletin boards. The discussion forum section, from where I
draw my examples, is divided into several subsections, including politics, society
and culture, leisure, and personals, among others. For the purposes of my argument, I selected examples from the politics section because it is the most active in
the entire forum. Out of several threads that were posted in May 2012,1 selected
those that were most popular, signaled by the number of "views" and responses
they received. Not surprisingly, the contents of a post were easily determined from
the titles or headings of the threads. So for instance, a thread post with the heading "Miguna's New Book: How Raila Wailed Uncontrollably in Front of Kibaki"
immediately located the discussion within a familiar news item about the public
fallout between the former advisor to the Prime Minister, Joshua Miguna Miguna,
and Kenya's Prime Minister, Raila Odinga. To briefly contextualize, Miguna was
suspended by Raila publicly in the media, leading to an equally public reaction
by Miguna who felt the suspension, done in a way similar to the dictator-style
tactics of former president Moi, was unfair and unwarranted (Namunane). What
is of interest here though is not the content of the public drama that followed, but
the ways in which members of Mashada used the information about the fallout.
Mashada exchanges are rarely politically neutral and mainly revolve around those
who support Kenya's ruling party, the Party of National Unity (PNU) and its president Mwai Kibaki, and those who support the opposition party, the Orange Democratic Movement (ODM) and its president Raila Odinga. Therefore, when a scandal
such as the one described above occurs, it creates an opportunity for mockery and
insult to be exchanged between the two groups. In the example above, information about the fallout between Miguna and Raila became an opportunity for PNU
supporters to ridicule their opponents.
While such exchanges between users appear to be useless banter, I argue that
they are in fact extremely revealing of the kinds of attitudes Kenyans have toward
leadership in Kenya and each other. The use of exaggeration and insult in reference
to politicians is a way for Kenyans to deal with the abhorrent excesses of power.
Mikhail Bakhtin's logic of the carnivalesque, in which power is unveiled by those
whose voices are ordinarily never heard, can be applied here to understand how
Mashada users reduce politicians to objects of ridicule, taming their power by
locating it in familiar, everyday spaces (Mbembe). Thus, posts such as "Mudavadi's
Wife Impregnated by Some Mhindi (Indian) in Town . . . Bastard Child," "Nation
DINA LIGAGA
Kenya have continued to use this to exercise power at the expense of ordinary
Kenyans. Members of Kenyan society have consequently developed an ethnicized
grammar with which they construct ideas of the ethnic other, who is seen as inferior and whose identity is captured in the same Stereotypie references used in their
engagements with the country's politics. Particularly during periods of political
upheaval, ethnic stereotypes were bandied about to discredit, insult, and, in many
ways, to mark the "other" as different and inferior. Based on the ethnicized nature
of Kenyan politics, in which most political parties are structured around large
ethnic groups such as the Luo, Luhya, and Kikuyu, the kinds of engagements that
Kenyans have online are often marked by elements of segregation in which various Kenyans begin to identify with parties aligned with their own ethnic groups.
Leaders of each party then become sites of reference to either discredit opponents
or reinforce/support political agendas.
The most applicable example of the manifestations of difference online
are the unfortunate events that followed the election in Kenya in 2007 and 2008;
namely the killing of thousands of Kenyans and the displacement of hundreds of
thousands more. The violence was instigated by botched election results, in which
the incumbent president, Mwai Kibaki, won by a small margin. This caused the
supporters of the opposition leader, Raila Odinga, and those of the president to
clash, leading to the worst case of internal violence in Kenyan history. During this
period, the official media struggled to censor and ban news of the violence, yet
information spilled from various alternative sites, key among them, the Internet
and mobile phones (Goldstein and Rotich; Zuckerman, "Citizen Media"; Musangi).
While the government was able to contain the use of mobile phones, by curbing
the spread of mass text messages, the Internet became a "free zone," an alternative space for circulating information, countering what the mainstream media
was saying and offering spaces for negotiating peace, but most memorably, for
distributing hate speech.
Chris Atton, in his analysis of far-right media on the Internet, argues that
the study of alternative media has tended to only privilege progressive, liberal,
or anarchist media while ignoring right-wing, racist, or ethnic media, which are
dismissed as immoral, unethical, and merely in support of hegemonic tendencies
and therefore not worthy of study ("Alternative Internet"). However, as he argues,
the circulation of hate speech is often a struggle to occupy symbolic power and
normalize hegemonic discourses and it is important to note how power manifests
itself in such a context. If one begins from this line of argument, it is possible to
engage with what was largely seen as hate speech being circulated by Kenyans.
Where before such kinds of exchanges were mostly confined to very small, private
spaces, the Internet now provided a location for Kenyans to display their disaffections with each other, their prejudices against the "other," and to confirm and
justify what they thought of one another.
Since the 2007 elections, online discussions and debates have been distinctively framed around ethnic politics by the supporters of President Kibaki and
those of Raila Odinga. The fact that these two groups were highlighted in a context
of a multi-ethnic nation such as Kenya followed the tribal logic of Kenyan politics
constructed before and during the reigns of the country's first and second presidents. That the political rivalry between Kikuyu and Luo has come to symbolically
represent the tone of politics in Kenya is no longer contestable.
In example 1, the kinds of ethnic divisions discussed earlier become visible. With
references to a "rumor" that the Luos of the Nyanza province of Kenya want to
secede and form a separate nation, the response captured above engages with how
the user feels about this ethnic group. It is a celebration of the fact that "Kenyans"
will no longer have to deal with "Lazy Luos," a stereotype that has been used
severally to describe them in the Kenyan social and political space. This stereotype dates back to the colonial era, where Luos, deemed uncooperative by colonial
administrators, were marked as lazy (E, A, Odhiambo), Immediately after independence, this stereotype was cemented by Kenya's first President, Jomo Kenyatta,
who used it to refer to and dismiss them after major disagreements with his Vice
President, Jaramogi Oginga Odinga, In Kenyan political discourse, the Luos have
continued to exist as radicals who constantly destabilize what otherwise would
be an easy rule for those in power.
The tussle between Luo politicians and the President has then always been
an anxious one, filled with constant struggles for power. Popular discourses on
the Luo and their relationship to power hold that they have struggled to gain the
presidential seat ever since independence and, because they have not yet achieved
this, they are constantly causing trouble for the ruling party. One gets a glimpse
of how this struggle has been interpreted in popular culture in example 1, Where
the political desire for a Luo-free Kenya would rest on the fact that they represent
a radical presence that makes absolute power impossible, in popular parlance
they are merely regarded as lazy, a handy stereotype that then makes it possible
to unconscientiously dismiss them as non-Kenyans,
Example 2
If Raila [had] won the presidency; KIKUYUS were to [be] killed in mass numbers
never again to be heard of; Mass prosecution of GEMA'S; Mass stone throwing
would be included in the constitution; Raila would not only be a president, but
a king of his cult; Mass destruction of property would also be included in the
constitution; Light coloured Kenyans would never visit Nyanza coz they may
have kikuyu blood, Kenyans would acquire Visa while visiting the KING'S
LAND [rift valley and Nyanza] like what Mobutu did, (Ours, "If Raila Won
Presidency")
DINA LIGAGA 11
Example 2 further extends the stereotype of the Luo discussed previously.
However, the kinds of dismissive stereotypes, where the Luo are associated with
monstrous actions, become a little more dangerous. In the example, Raila Odinga,
who has been deemed the de facto leader of (zombified) Luos, is painted as a monster who, should he become president, would specifically target the Kikuyu ethnic
group and basically annihilate them. I argue that this kind of irrational fear is part
of a larger set of constructed discourses meant to serve those in power. Such discourses make it easier for politicians to manipulate their electorates, among who
deep-seated fears of the "other" are constantly being referenced and ignited at will
in the Kenyan political sphere. By drawing from such shorthand understandings
of politics and political relations among Kenyans, online users fall prey to larger
political games that are played and sustained by politicians, who invariably are
the only true beneficiaries of such power struggles.
It is not just the Luos who take a character beating online, however. As is seen
in the example below, another stereotype dragged from the colonial period, this
time about the Kikuyu ethnic group, plays itself out:
Example 3
Bullsh.it! A thief must never rule. Senator put it well, where a community considers thieving as a virtue instead of a vice, then the other communities have
a moral obligation to separate from this community (read thief Kibaki and his
criminal supporters). (Ours, "If Raila Won Presidency")
Once again, as is the case of the Luo, the stereotypes in Example 3 are specifically targeted at Kikuyu leadership. In the above example, Kikuyus are deemed
thieves and, as such, are linked squarely with corruption and immorality with
regard to power. Again, "other" communities are "urged" to separate themselves
from the Kikuyu if they are to save themselves from these "criminals." Like the
stereotype of the lazy Luo, the stereotype of the Kikuyu as thieves was also used
by colonial agents and the white settler communities in Kenya to describe this
group with who they had close encounters. This stereotype made its way into
popular parlance and is used randomly to "understand" how Kikuyus "operate"
in social and political circles. In Example 3, the stereotype is used to discredit the
value of Kikuyu leadership, pointing out that it only leads to increased corruption
in the country. It works to make Kikuyu leaders unattractive and to dismiss their
credibility. As above, the last example below continues to stretch this stereotype:
Example 4
Are you forcing us to respect those who don't respect Kenyans? You and your
people have no moral ground to impose on Kenyans a toad in order to gain
respect by force. Wakati wenyu umefika. You can beat your chest harder but
at the end of the day you'll be seated under those funny Mugumo trees in
jiggerland. (Kenyan_gangster, "Balala a Lesotho to Be Formed for Kikuyus")
Example 4 makes references directly to Kibaki's return to the office of President of Kenya, which was seen by opposition party supporters as extremely unfair
and unacceptable. Mwai Kibaki was sworn in for a second term in a hurriedly prepared ceremony that, unlike his first swearing in, was private. His first swearing
in, in 2002, was a public affair that marked a great milestone in Kenyan history, as
DINA LIGAGA JS 13
Importantly, such revelations make it possible to understand the logic behind
the "cyberwars" that took place among different Kenyans online during and
after the 2007 elections. While a number of websites and blogs were created in an
effort to forge peace among Kenyans, several other spaces were formed specifically to gather followers who supported very particular ethnic or tribalist ideas
(Zuckerman, "Citizen Media").
Yet, in spite of the negative aspects raised in the analysis of the examples
above, Kenyan Internet usage is not always filled with such desolate engagements.
In fact, one of the most remarkable aspects of Kenyan online usage is the vibrant
and creative ways in which they have been able to engage with political and social
goings-on. Great examples exist in the phenomenon of Makmende, a viral sensation that circulated as short quips about an imaginary hero called Makmende. The
creation and circulation of this phenomenon showed how Kenyans were capable
of momentarily setting aside their differences to have fun as Kenyans. Importantly,
Makmende had no ethnic background, had a very ethnic-neutral name borrowed
from sheng (street parlance of Kenyan city spaces), and who existed in a world
that remained unmarked by familiar landscapes of Kenyan towns. The Makmende phenomenon, based on its ability to morph through its many intertextual
references, became an instant hit just months after Kenya's horrendous violence
against each other. In addition to Makmende, the Internet has hosted several creative videos of Kenyan popular culture on YouTube, such as the extremely trendy
Bonoko video that makes fun of Kenyan police dealings with ordinary (and often
unarmed) Kenyans, among many others.
Apart from the extensive possibilities created by the Internet for the circulation of creative forms, it must be noted that several decent forums exist in which
Kenyans are able to dialogue in rational ways about the state of politics in Kenya.
Websites such as jukwaa.com and rcbowen.com, as well as several others, have
allowed Kenyans to engage with several alternative versions of stories that are
circulated in mainstream media. The Internet can also be seen as a space in which
Kenyan social lives are performed. On mashada.com alone, posts such as "Manyake,
Very Skinny" (small buttocks), "Nairobi Prostitutes Serve 3 to 4 Clients a Night,"
and "Exclusive Kenya Bush Sex: Muliro Gardens," etc., are quite revealing in terms
of their popularity and show the kinds of subjects that preoccupy the minds and
time of their users. The kinds of posts made on the social forum section of the
website have the possibility of opening up interesting debates around gender
relations and attitudes online.
Nonetheless, this article has emphasized ways in which the Internet is not a
simple alternative space and that complex sets of relations between Kenyans, as
well as with power, are revealed by engaging with the kinds of exchanges that take
place in some Kenyan online spaces. The article has gone into a lengthy discussion
on what an oppositional culture in Kenya represents and the ways in which the
Internet has aided in making this culture possible. It has also pointed out how the
Internet has allowed for honest engagements among Kenyans who have exchanges
online with their fragmented identities. I deliberately chose a controversial website,
mashada.com, to expose ways in which online popular cultures often reinforce
hegemonic tendencies in Kenya. Rather than offer a neat analysis of how Kenyans
use the online space, I have shown that this space is in itself rife with contradictions, indicative of the same kinds of relationships of which it is reflective. I have
DINA LIGAGA
15
16
Copyright of Research in African Literatures is the property of Indiana University Press and its content may not
be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written
permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.