JEITA tcm1023-230648

Toshiaki Takahashi, JEITA ISTEC, 2014.09.
18
Inspection of the guideline in the production field

Is the published 3D-related specification really useful in business?
Working validation of 3D-related

standards and guidelines
Are the published 3D-related standards and guidelines
really useful in actual work?
2014.09.18
JEITA 3D CAD Data Standardization Committee
Demonstration Working Group Chief
Canon Inc., Toshiaki Takahashi
Copyright (c)2011, Japan Electronics and Information Technology Industries Association, All rights reserved.
CAD
We will be introducing the following three JEITA

guidelines, through content validated in actual work.
Refer to the following URL for details:

http: //home.jeita.or.jp/3d/index.htm
CAD
Production processes
and 3D-related information in JEITA

3D-related information
DTPD
2013.05 Takahas
2014.02 Takahas
Related information
DTPD
Management
information
Design information
Manufacturing
data
Analysis data
3DA model
Test data
Quality data
Service data
Model
Management
information
2D
drawings
Design model
Model
Geometric
form
Supplementar
y information
Geometric
form
Product
characteristics
Displayed
requirements
Undisplayed
requirements
Related information
Production process
Development and production
preparation processes
PLM
(DTPD, design BOM)
Product
ion
design
Analysi
s
Needs
Product
Plannin
g
Design
Development
CAD
Seeds
Techn
ology
Develo
pment
Mass production
processes
CAE, ease of
assembly
Logistics, sales, and maintenance (to the

customer) processes
PLM
(DTPD, production
BOM)
CAT
Measure
ment
Inspectio
n
Trial
CAE
Digital
validation
Digital
Mockup
Process design
Tool design and validation

of ease of assembly
Massproduc
tion
prototy
pe
Work procedure
manual
(Part production,
part procurement,
assembly)
Mass
produc
tion
system
establi
shment
Internallyproduced
parts
Production
Production
and assembly
by
outsourcers
Assemb
ly,
Inspecti
on
Sales
Sales
Manual
Maintenance
Service
Service
Manual
Marketing
(Customer
consultation office)
CAD
3D design guidelines
CAD
Die design and machining guidelines
CAD
Measurement guidelines
CAD
Production processes
and 3D-related information

3D-related information
DTPD
2013.05 Takahas
2014.02 Takahas
Related information
DTPD
Management
information
Design information
Manufacturing
data
Analysis data
3DA model
Test data
Quality data
Service data
Model
Management
information
2D
drawings
Design model
Model
Geometric
form
Supplementar
y information
Geometric
form
Product
characteristics
Displayed
requirements
Undisplayed
requirements
Related information
Measurement guidelines
Production process
Development and production
preparation processes
PLM
(DTPD, design BOM)
Product
ion
design
Analysi
s
Needs
Product
Plannin
g
Design
Development
CAD
Seeds
Techn
ology
Develo
pment
Mass production
processes
CAE, ease of
assembly
Logistics, sales, and maintenance (to the

customer) processes
PLM
(DTPD, production
BOM)
CAT
Measure
ment
Inspectio
n
Trial
CAE
Digital
validation
Digital
Mockup
Process design
Tool design and validation

of ease of assembly
Massproduc
tion
prototy
pe
Work procedure
manual
(Part production,
part procurement,
assembly)
Mass
produc
tion
system
establi
shment
Internallyproduced
parts
Production
Production
and assembly
by
outsourcers
Assemb
ly,
Inspecti
on
Sales
Sales
Manual
Maintenance
Service
Service
Manual
Marketing
(Customer
consultation office)
CAD
Agenda
1. Introducing the JEITA 3D CAD Data Standardization
Committee
2. The Purpose and Aim of the Working Validation
3. Results Obtained From the Working Validation
3-1. Product design
3-2 Die design
3-3. Measurement and assessment
3-4. Opinions in the workplace
4 Future Schedules
CAD
1.
Introducing the Japan Electronics and Information

Technology Industries Association
What is JEITA?
The Japan Electronics and Information Technology Industries Association (JEITA) is an industry body that
promotes the sound production, and increased trade and consumption, of electronics devices and
components. By doing so, it aims to contribute to the overall advancement of the electronics and information
technology industries, the development of the Japanese economy, and the elevation of culture. (From the
articles of association)
JEITAs Policy and Strategy Board

- Director companies and chair/subchair companies
Fujitsu Limited (chairman Masami Yamamoto)
Sharp Corporation
Hitachi, Ltd.
Panasonic Corporation
Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
NEC Corporation
Sony Corporation
Toshiba Corporation
Yokogawa Electric Corporation
Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
- Policy executive companies (alphabetical)
Alps Electric Co., Ltd.
Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd.
Canon Inc.
JVC Kenwood Corporation
Seiko Epson Co.
TDK Corporation
Pioneer Corporation
Renesas Electronics Corporation
> Number of full members: 279> Number of associate members:

117(as of May 13, 2014)
- Policy director companies (alphabetical)
Asahi Glass Co., Ltd.
Azbil Corporation
Advantest Corporation
Ikegami Tsushinki Co., Ltd.
SMK Corporation
Omron Corporation
Kyocera Corporation
KOA Corporation
Shimadzu Corporation
Soshin Electric Co.,Ltd.
Taiyo Yuden Co., Ltd.
Tabuchi Electric Co., Ltd.
Tamura Corporation
Teac Corporation
Teikoku Tsushin Kogyo Co., Ltd.
TOA Corporation
D&M Holdings Inc.
DX Antenna Co., Ltd.
Denso Corporation
Toko, Inc.
Nichicon Corporation
IBM Japan, Ltd.
Nippon Chemi-Con Corporation
Japan Aviation Electronics Industry, Ltd.
Nihon Kohden Corporation
JRC Nihon Musen
Hitachi Metals, Ltd
Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd.
Fuji Electric Co., Ltd.
Hokuriku Electric Industry Co., Ltd.
Hosiden Corporation
Maspro Denkoh Corp.
Mitsumi Electric Co., Ltd.
Ricoh Company, Ltd.
Rohm Co., Ltd.
CAD
10
Organization Diagram of the Japan Electronics and Information

JEITA boards and committees
Board of Directors
Policy and Strategy Board
Boards for each field

Consumer Electronics Board
Display Devices Board
Information Technology and Industrial
Systems Board
Steering Committee on Policy and

Strategy
Committees for each topic

Standardization Policy
Committee
3D CAD Data Standardization
Committee
Safety Policy Committee

Environment Committee
Electronic Components Board
Legal and Intellectual Property

Rights Committee
Semiconductor Board
Green IT Committee
Kansai Branch
Kansai Branch Steering Board
Business to Business Electronic

Commerce Board
New Merging Fields Committee
CAD
11
What is the Japan Electronics and Information Technology Industries Association

(JEITA)
3D CAD Data Standardization Committee?
Purpose of Establishment
In order to use 3D CAD data effectively, through to the manufacturing stage, we aim to establish industry
standards which do not depend on specific tools and spread them widely in related industries. Our intent
in doing so is to further the progress of manufacturing technology in Japan, which is to say, to foster
innovation and advancement in design and manufacturing. We plan to enact and publish the outputs from
this committee as JEITA standards, with the aims of proposing them as Japan Industrial Standards (JIS),
and beyond that, to establish an international standard within ISO.
Participating companies
- Elysium Co., Ltd
- Omron Corporation
- Canon Inc.
- Konica Minolta, Inc.
- Seiko Epson Co.
- Sony Corporation
- Toshiba Corporation
- Nabtesco Corporation
- Nikon Corporation
- NEC Corporation
As of May 2014: 17 full member companies, 7 associate member companies
- Panasonic Corporation
- Hitachi, Ltd.
- Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd.
- Fujitsu Corporation
- Brother Industries, Ltd.
- Horiba, Ltd.
- Yamaha Corporation
(alphabetical)
(Associate members)
- Argo Graphics Inc.
- Ntt Data Engineering Systems
Corporation
- Siemens Industry Software K.K.
- Solidworks Japan K.K.
- Dassault Systemes K.K.
- Information Systems International
- Dentsu, Ltd.
- Ptc Japan Co., Ltd.
(alphabetical)
JEITA: Japan Electronics and Information Technology Industries Association

CAD
12
Organization Chart of the 3D CAD Data

Standardization Committee
JEITA boards and committees
(As of May 2014)
Chair: Seiko Epson

Vice-chair Hitachi, Ltd.
Secretary general Nabtesco
3D CAD Data Standardization Committee
Board of
Directors
Strategy
Project
Standardization
Working Group
Chief:
Hitachi, Ltd.
PR and strategy
Canon
Toshiba
Canon
Extension
Omron
Ubukata
Takahashi
Fujinuma
Ito
Kita
> Planning, extension activities, relations

with relevant bodies, overseas
investigations
Chief: Hitachi, Ltd. ... Takeda
> Deliberation on the JEITA standard for 3D single diagrams

> Relations with the JIS development committee on 3D drawings,
and deliberation on drafts
> Validation of the content of 3DA model guidelines
Usage Working
Group
Chief: Fuji Xerox, Shigeta
> Deliberation on usage of 3D data

Sheet metals parts, Die processes, Measurement
processes
> Deliberation on IT tools for the use of 3D data
Demonstration
Working Group
Takahashi
Ubukata
Kiriyama
Chief: Canon, Takahashi
> Validation of the effects and identified issues for each

guideline
Running the Design Contest
> Providing examples, effect investigations, and extension to
full member companies
> Deliberation on policies towards using DTPD through case
analysis
CAD
13
2. The Purpose and Aim of the Working

Validation
CAD
2-1 The Purpose of working validation

To provide standards and guidelines that are of use in
actual work
The effects of using the standards and guidelines that
the JEITA 3D CAD Data Standardization Committee
has published or intends to publish, and the issues
affecting them, are validated on the basis of actual
work.
The above activities performed by individual
participating companies, to enable JEITA to publish
the above usage effects, include information
confidential to each company, so they cannot be
disclosed.
JEITA shares the effects of these activities, and uses
them as supplementary materials for standards and
CAD
2-2. Processes now

demonstrated
From documents provided by the JIS Development Committee

Development and production preparation processes
PLM
(3D-DPD, design BOM)
Production
Design
Analysis
PLM
(3D-DPD, production BOM)
CAE, ease of
assembly
Measurement,
inspection,
trial
CAE
Needs
Product
Planning
Seeds
Technology
Development
Digital validation
(prototype)
Design
Development
CAD
Logistics, sales, and maintenance

(to the customer) processes
Mass production processes
Prototyping
Die manufacturing
for internallyproduced parts
Establish
Part
mass
inspection production
Die design, tool design,

validation of ease of
assembly
Production of
Internallyproduced parts
Assembly,
Inspection
Sales
Sales manual
Digital mockup
Process
Design
CAT
Measurement,
inspection,
trial
CAT
Production and
assembly by
outsourcers
Work procedure manual
(Part production,
part procurement, assembly)
Die manufacturing
by outsourcers
Work procedure
manual
(Die fabrication)
Maintena
nce,
Service
Service manual
Marketing
(Customer consultation
office)
Demonstrated process
CAD
16
2-3. The Aim of the Working Validation

To clarify what kinds of work in the processes of die design, inspection, and measurement are
improved by JEITA guidelines, and to what extent
Anticipated effects in die design processes
- Consultations between product design and die design after the release of drawings will be
eliminated.
(Die delivery times, prices, callout costs, etc.)
- Changes in die design due to inadequate consideration of ease of mass production will be
eliminated.
(Product startup time, fault costs)
Anticipated effects in measurement processes
- Using contactless measurement to cross-reference geometric tolerance areas (areas where
dimension labeling may be omitted) to color maps makes it possible to automate the
referencing of stated geometric tolerance, including 3D measuring machines.
Design process (at present only issues have been validated, and effects are now being validated)
- Work to incorporate die requirements (PM3) will increase.
- Consultations after the release of drawings, and changes to product designs to match dies,
will be eliminated.
- Unified management of design information will shorten the development time for similar
products.
CAD
2-4 Working validation measures and work

Product design (PM3)
Die design (TM2)
Die fabrication
Plastic molding
Measurement and assessment

(PM3, PM5)
(PM3)
Die requirement incorporation

rank
Incorporate the necessary items,
of the 49 PM3 items, into the
design
- Mismatch
- Insert splitting
- Gate positioning
- Parting line
-
Contactless measurement + contact

measurement + general-purpose
measurement
Cutting
Casting
(PM5)
We will not be validating die

fabrication and molding at this
stage, so part fabrication will
be by cutting and casting
Optimum measurement
method and measurement
work quantity calculation
Checking with the product

designer
Reduction of items
Die design work quantity calculation
Incorporate
PM3
(PM5)
CAD
2-5. Response to issues and problems

Issues and problems raised by the guidelines themselves have been examined
by each working group, and revised editions have already been published.
1. Dealing with issues and problems raised by the guidelines, as obtained

through the working validation.
[1] Standardization Working Group 3D Model Guidelines
[2] Usage Working Group/ Dies Team Die Process Linkage Guidelines
[3] Usage Working Group/ Measurement Team Measurement Guidelines
Using 3DA Models
2. The next theme of activity for the working groups is to be confirmation of
the content of improvements applied by each working group to issues and
problems
CAD
3 Results Obtained From the Working Validation

3-1. Product design
3-2 Die design
3-3. Measurement and assessment
3-4. Opinions in the workplace
CAD
3-1. Product design validation results
1. The purpose of product design

validation, and its output
2. Product design content

3. Issues raised at the validation stage
4. Effects and issues
CAD
3-1-1. The purpose of product design validation, and

its output
1. Background
The 3D Model Guidelines could not be completed before the start of
product design, so validation of effects on product design will be performed
in Phase 2, and at this stage, validation mainly covered the identification of
issues in the 3DA Model Guidelines and the 3D Single Diagram Die
Process Linkage Guidelines Ver1.0.
The validation of later processes (particularly working validation) will require
design data based on the 3DA Model Guidelines, so the product design data
was handled after the 3DA Model Guidelines were complete.
2. The purpose of product design validation

To validate the validity and issues of each guideline in actual work.
3. Output
Effects and identified issues of the stated content of each guideline
CAD
3-1-2. Product design content
1. Product design parts

The two molded parts
- Gearbox (ISTEC0012)
- Camera front cover (ISTEC0013)
2. At the release of drawing level
PM3 (from the Die Process Linkage Guidelines)
2D drawings (for conventional work quantity estimation)
3. Release of drawing
NX data (NX 7.5)
Parasolid data
JT data
IGES data
STEP data
Document
CAD
Data transfer status

Product design
Die design
Company K
Shape
PMI
NX data
Solid
Company
N
Parasolid data
Shape
STEP data
Curve
NX
Document
Measurement
NX data
NX
Document
Die design
Parasolid data
CADmeister
Document
PMI data check

NG
JT2Go
XpresReview
NX data
Cutting
Contact
measurement
Camio
assessment
Document
Feedback
Document
[Measurement data transfer status]

Focus and Camio have functions for direct
conversion of NX data, so with the exception of
some PMI (dimensional tolerances, circle E,
etc.), it was possible to import the data.
Shape check
IGES data
Document
Document
Contactless measurement assessment
Geomagic
Qualify
PMI
Document
Contactless measurement assessment
CATIA
Shape
Feedback
PMI data check
Focus
Shape
PMI
Feedback
Product design
JT data
PMI
Die design
PMI data check
[Die design data transfer status]

Company K had no problem because it uses the
same CAD.
Company N uses different die design CAD, so
an intermediate format was used for the shapes.
STEP has some places which are not solidified,
so Parasolid was used. STEP was used for
partings and other curves. (Because Parasolid
does not support curves)
Company N uses JT to check PMI information.
There was no problem with the JT output from
NX, but the lack of a free viewer function to
check JT caused the following two problems:
Displaced and superimposed dimensions
The associations between dimensions
and faces cannot be checked
This can be worked around with screencaptured documents.
PMI data check
Document
Document
Feedback
[Machining data transfer status]

Shapes could be imported with no problems
through IGES.
The transfer of PMIs was not checked, because
the purpose was to make the actual objects for
measurement.
This can be avoided with screen-captured
documents.
CAD
Fabricated parts Gearbox (ISTE C0012) PM3

Product
functions
Key
functional
parts
Geometric
tolerance
Die requirements
Engraving
Ejector position
Gate position
Slope not allowed
Parting line
Parting-related draft angles
CAD
Fabricated part Camera front cover (ISTEC0013) PM3

Product
functions
Key
functional
parts
Geometric
tolerance
Die requirements
Grain
Callout line countermeasures
Gate position
Parting line
Undercut/ mismatch countermeasures Ease of flash formation
CAD
Issue examples
1 The specification of geometric tolerances cannot be expressed according to JISB0021, B0022,
B0023, B0024, and B0419.
Attempting to express them in the same ways is extremely labor-intensive.
Validate all specification methods, and clarify responses
Geometric
tolerance
Geometric
tolerance
Geometric
tolerance
CAD
27
Contacts perpendicularly
Contacts
perpendicularly
In this case, there is

circular deflection in
the radial direction,
so the arrow must
be clearly
perpendicular to the
axis line.
In this case, there is

overall deflection in
the axial direction,
so the arrow must
be clearly parallel to
the axis line.
28
CAD
3-1-4. Effects and issues

Validation of effects was not possible this time, but we could determine that the following
effects can be expected.
1. The 3DA Model Guidelines still have room for improvement as guides for actual design
work, but by newly defining the normal geometric tolerance, the statement of normal
geometric tolerance locations is eliminated, and workability can be expected to improve
greatly in design and modeling work.
2Giving an unambiguous definition in terms of geometric tolerance makes it easier to
convey the design intent clearly to subsequent processes than it was before
(dimensional tolerance specification), so workability in the design, machining, and
measurement departments can be expected to improve.
A product design validation covering more parts is under in progress in Phase 2.

- Validation of effects in product design
- Identify issues related to CAD functions and data conversion
CAD
29
3-2. Summary of the die design

validation results
1. The purpose of die design validation, and
its output
2. Inquiry content from die design
3. Issues raised at the validation stage, and
proposals for improvement
4. Validation results
5. Effects and issues
CAD
3-2-1. The purpose of die design validation, and its output

1. The purpose of die design validation
(1) This working validation checks the validity of work in compliance with
3DA Model Guidelines and Die Process Linkage Guidelines
- The validity of release of drawings as PM3 is compared with the

conventional method (in which PM1 is released as drawings and the die
design proceeds with a few consultations).
3. Output
(1) Clarify what tasks in die design are improved, what tasks are worsened,
and by how much, when PM3 is used for product design?
(2) Summarize issues and improvement proposals concerning the 3DA
Model Guidelines and the Die Process Linkage Guidelines
CAD
Deliverables (PM5: Resin model)
ISTEC0013 (Camera Front Cover)
ISTEC0012 (Gear Box)
Orange: Cavity
Green: Core
Red:
Undercut
Blue:
Straight
(vertical wall)
CAD
Deliverables (TM2: Cavity and core model)

ISTEC0012 (Gear Box)
ISTEC0013 (Camera Front Cover)
CAD
Product
No.
Indicated content
Reply content
Gear Box G_DM-002 Is any action required for thin areas of dies?
Apply the specification for unspecified R
As in the instruction section, the die becomes thinner (in

the sharp edge), but is any action required?
Would applying a 0.5 radius without specification be a
good decision?
CAD
Product
Camera
Front
Cover
No.
Indicated content
As in the Guideline specification measure,

C_DM-001 making the hole deeper is an effective action
for callout lines
Reply content
Eliminate surrounding cutaway and make holes
0.5mm deeper
[6] Increase the number of callout line

locations for annotations from 1 to 2, and
lower the bottom face by 0.5mm
CAD
35
Product
Camera
Front
Cover
No.
Indicated content
There is no extrusion specification, but can a

C_DM-002 rectangular block be placed against places
where flashes enter?
Reply content
If it is a place where a fingernail cannot catch,
it is OK to extrude in a block
CAD
Product
Camera
Front
Cover
No.
Indicated content
Flashing occurs between the slide and the

C_DM-003 cavity, so we want to lower the parting on the
top of the slide and raise it on the bottom
Reply content
Lower the parting on the top of the slide
Raise the parting on the bottom of the slide
CAD
Product
Camera
Front
Cover
No.
Indicated content
Reply content
Shutter slide sticking is a concern, so I want to

Change the design to add a circular indentation
C_DM-005 hold it down with a pin. Would leaving a mark in
in the shutter part
this way be a problem?
Hold the slide down with a pin

so that it does not stick
CAD
Product
Camera
Front
Cover
No.
C_DM-006
Indicated content
Reply content
Is it good to put the center of a curved shape in Put the center of a curved shape in the PL of
the PL of the slide part in vertically?
the slide part in vertically
CAD
Issue examples
Field
Product
category
Document
ID
Standards
and
guidelines
Common
temp_01
Issue
Setting the PL line, EP extrusion range, etc.
Setting the PL line
There is a slight collision between the slide and the cavity.

Change the PL to a place with no impact.
Provisional process
This was set as specified
Permanent remedy
Submitting settings to the die manufacturer can
shorten the workflow. The product design side
specifies areas where extrusion etc. are not
possible.
Setting the EP range
We want to set EP on a rising step shape, so rather than specifying the EP extrusion range,
it appears to be better to specify the range in which it is not possible.
A surface with the draft angle changed from 0 to 1.25 becomes a cavity shape,
so there is concern over the product thread
Change the PL to a place with no product thread
There is concern over the slide sticking.
Change the PL so that the shape on the core side is slightly cut away.
CAD
Field
System
Product
category
Common
Document ID
temp_02
Issue
Provisional process
The expression in the JT file is not accurately conveyed (XpresReview 8.3)

A JT file with a revised output method was sent by Mr. N on 7/11
As a result, the dimension expression etc. were greatly improved,
so there is almost no problem
The cut surface on the cross sectional diagram at x is not colored
Image specified using PowerPoint
Initially-supplied JT file
Permanent
remedy
Judge from the screen shot

attached by the designer
JT file supplied on 7/11
CAD
Field
System
Product
category
Document ID
Common
temp_02
Issue
Provisional process
The expression in the JT file is not accurately conveyed (XpresReview 8.3)

A JT file with a revised output method was sent by Mr. N on 7/11
As a result, the dimension expressions etc. were greatly improved, so there is almost no
problem
The expression coloring surface x (for specifying the surface range where EP is possible,
etc.) is not output
Image specified using PowerPoint
Initially-supplied JT file
Permanent
remedy
Judge from the screen shot

attached by the designer
JT file supplied on 7/11
CAD
Field
System
Product category Document ID

Camera_Front_Co
ver
temp_03
Issue
This did not become solid in the STEP data
Provisional process
Permanent remedy
Use Parasolid for this
Separation between faces in contact occurred on the surface boundary

in the red-lined area
CAD
3-2-4. Validation results

For the gearbox,
the process of Die requirement checks and inquiries required an average of 46% less work, between the two companies
(* The outlook is for the work quantity to be reduced by an average of 22% for die design as a whole)
Product: Gear Box
Company K
[Assumption A]
Operation using 3D model +
2D drawings
Company N
[Demonstration B]
Operation on the 3D
annotation model (PM3)
[Assumption A]
Operation using 3D model
+ 2D drawings
[Demonstration B]
Operation on the 3D
Die requirement checks and inquiries
413 min
230 min
553 min
290 min
Product model correction (PM5)
245 min
245 min
255 min
255 min
Die model creation (TM1)
275 min
275 min
260 min
260 min
Total
933 min
750 min
1,068 min
805 min
Company K
-44%
Company N
-48%
Average of 2
companies
-46%
(TM2)
CAD
For the camera front cover,

the process of Die requirement checks and inquiries required an average of 46% less work, between the two companies
(* The outlook is for the work quantity to be reduced by an average of 25% for die design as a whole)
Product: Camera Front Cover

Company K
[Assumption A]
Operation using 3D model +
2D drawings
Company N
[Demonstration B]
Operation on the 3D
[Assumption A]
Operation using 3D model
+ 2D drawings
[Demonstration B]
Operation on the 3D
Die requirement checks and inquiries
426 min
240 min
581 min
295 min
Product model correction (PM5)
285 min
285 min
185 min
185 min
Die model creation (TM1)
220 min
220 min
200 min
200 min
Total
931 min
745 min
966 min
680 min
Company K
-44%
Company N
-49%
Average of 2
companies
-46%
(TM2)
CAD

What tasks in die design are improved, and by how much, when PM3 is used for product design?
High reduction effects were obtained within processes in Die requirement checks and inquiries
Work quantity for die requirement checks (parting lines/ extrusion positions/ flashing production potential/ draft
angle position, etc.)
Work quantities comparing 3D models and 2D drawings (work quantity for checking that the 3D models were prepared
correctly according to the 2D drawings)
Comparison of detailed work quantities within the Die requirement checks and inquiries process
Product: Gear Box

Die requirement
checks and inquiries
Average of 2
companies
-46%
Comparison
between
2D and 3D
Design preparation,
data conversion
Comparison of detailed work quantities within the Die requirement checks and inquiries process
Product: Camera
Front Cover
Die requirement
checks and inquiries
Average of 2
companies
-46%
Comparison
between
2D and 3D
Design preparation,
data conversion
CAD

Issues concerning the Die Process Linkage Guidelines
PL position check work should be performed once at the first stage
after PM3 release of drawings, between product design and mold
design.
Checks of positions where EP is not possible should be confirmed
between product design and mold design, before release of drawings.
Draft angle specification reading could not be performed smoothly, so

we want to have a method established for making clear specifications.
Currently-usable viewers often fail to accurately convey specifications
in PM3.
We want clarification of what should be checked on the release of
drawing side
(This is not covered in the current guideline content)
CAD
3-3. Summary of the measurement and assessment

validation results
1. The purpose of measurement and

assessment validation, and its output
2. Measurement results
3. Validation results
4. Issues raised at the validation stage, and

proposals for improvement
CAD
3-3-1. The purpose of measurement and assessment

validation, and its output
1. The purpose of measurement validation, and its output
Check the validity of 3DA models based on the 3DA Model Guidelines
(corresponding to normal geometric tolerances), and of part measurements and
assessments incorporating contactless measurement.
[2] Check the validity of operation in compliance with the two guidelines
Measurement Guidelines Using 3DA Models and 3DA Model Guidelines
2. Output
Clarify which tasks were improved or worsened, and by how much, by the
incorporation of 3DA models and contactless measurement in measurement and
assessment, compared to the conventional method (2D drawings + 3D model)
[2] Summarize issues and proposed improvements for the Measurement
Guidelines Using 3DA Models and 3DA Model Guidelines
CAD
Measuring machine (reference)

Basic data for measurement
Measuring machine
(manufacturer name
and model No.)
Body: Nikon Metrology / LK V 10.10.8
Nikon Metrology / MCAx
Contact probe PT200
Contactless probe LC15Dx
Contactless probe MMDx
Contact-type, with a touch probe
Laser method
Laser method
Working distance: 60 mm
Positional alignment
between shots
Positional alignment on the measuring

machines themselves
Positional alignment on the measuring machines

themselves
Spray
No
Yes
Yes
Jig
Front and rear
composition method
Yes
Yes
Yes
Shape alignment
Shape alignment
Shape alignment
Measurement
principles
Lens
Calibration method
By the standard method for an instrument using a calibration ball
By the standard method for an instrument using a

calibration plate
Notes
Gate-type gauge capable of contact and contactless measurement, by replacing

probes
Multi-jointed arm-type gauge
CAD
Basic data for assessment

Measuring machine
(manufacturer name and
model No.)
Body: Nikon Metrology / LK V 10.10.8
Nikon Metrology / MCAx
Contact probe PT200
Contactless probe LC15Dx
Contactless probe MMDx
Camio 7.2
Focus Inspection 10.1
Focus Inspection 10.1
Parameter setting for

the smoothing process
Yes (automatic by software)
No
Parameter setting at the

plan output stage
No
No
Software used/
Version
Point group data
DG&T data
Parameter setting for
filters etc.
Default
Default
CAD
Measurement validation status (reference)

Measuring machine (contact type)
: Nikon Metrology / LK V 10.10.8 +PT200
CAD
Measurement validation status (reference)

Measuring machine (contactless type)
: Nikon Metrology / LK V 10.10.8 + LC15Dx
CAD
3-3-2. Measurement results
Measurement results (color map)
Tolerance category of each face
0.1mm
0.2mm
0.3mm
CAD
Gear Box: Contactless measurement (LK V + LC15DX)

Display as a color map corresponding to normal geometric tolerances (3 levels)
+ Outside tolerance
No features in
CAD
+ Error
- Error
- Outside tolerance
NG due to draft angle

However, this level
may be ignored
Point group omission
CAD
Camera Front Cover: - Contactless measurement (LK V + LC15DX)

Display as a color map corresponding to normal geometric tolerances (3 levels)
+ Outside tolerance
Curled
+ Error
- Error
- Outside tolerance
Because the
tolerance is too
strict (0.1)
The NG range is
too wide
CAD
3-3-3. Validation results

Gear Box:
-27% work quantity with LF contact measurement, -29% with LK contactless measurement,
and -48% with MCA
-27%
-29%
-48%
Assessment
Contact measurement of
molded products
Contactless
measurement of molded
products
Individual position check
and method
consideration
CAD
Camera Front Cover:

-28% work quantity with LF contact measurement, -19% with LK contactless measurement,
and -39% with MCA
-19%
-28%
-39%
Assessment
Contact measurement of
molded products
Contactless measurement
of molded products
Individual position check
and method consideration
CAD
Processes with prospects for work reduction:
Automatic PMI import (2-5 Inputting dimensions and geometric tolerances
Geometric tolerances (Part path teaching, measurement, measurement result output,

summary of measurement results)
Camera Front Cover
Gear Box
1000
1000
900
900
5-1)180
800
700
3-5)40
3-4)40
5-1)120
600
500
3-2)180
400
3-5)20
3-4)20
3-2)120
300
800
5-1)180
700
3-5)40
3-4)40
600
500
3-5)20
3-4)15
3-2)180
400
3-2)120
300
2-5)60
200
100
5-1)120
2-5)5
200
2-2)200
2-2)164
100
2-5)40
2-5)5
2-2)180
2-2)174
5-1)
4-1)
3-5)
3-4)
3-3)
3-2)
3-1)
2-9)
2-8)
2-7)
2-6)
2-5)
2-4)
2-3
2-2)
2-1)
1-)
1-)
1-)
1-1)
CAD
Effects of measurement and assessment using 3DA models and contactless

measurement, compared to the conventional method (2D drawings + 3D model)
Compared to operation with 2D drawings + 3D model, work reduction effects were obtained in the
following processes with contactless or contact measurement
[1] Contact measurement: Part path teaching, measurement, measurement result output,
summary of measurement results
[2] Contactless measurement Inputting dimensions and geometric tolerances,
assessment, and summary of measurement results
Current effects
Using 3DAM, geometric tolerances can be automatically imported from files, so input work is
eliminated.
The automatic extraction function for target point groups eliminates the work of manual
assignment to features
Compared to the conventional method, normal input of geometric tolerances and assessment of
faces by contactless measurement reduces the measurements and assessment points
Future effects
Error calculation between CAD and point groups eliminates the work of tolerance input and
result summary for each feature, corresponding to precision grades, if normal geometric
tolerances are applied.
CAD
Examples of issues raised at the validation stage

No.
1-1
Product
category
Common
Measuring
machine
Common
Issue
The classification of normal

geometric tolerance grades
by distance is difficult to
understand if done
manually (this is in common
for each result)
Provisional
process
Permanent remedy
As indicated at
the briefing,
this is covered
by displaying
color maps
with three
scales.
Use automatic setting on the measurement

software side, or set using CAD
Just coloring faces in CAD can reduce work
quantity
(It is not included in the above working
times for this case, but coloring in CAD too
about 3 hours per sample)
It would be good to have guidelines
presented as examples for each case
Color-code faces according to tolerance

classifications
- Distance: 6mm or less, Tolerance: 0.1mm
- Distance: 6~30mm, Tolerance: 0.2mm

- Distance: 30~120mm, Tolerance: 0.3mm
Distance is indicated with the cross section line
CAD
No.
1-2
Product
category
Common
Measuring
machine
Issue
Common
There could be large errors

if 3DAM PM3 is covered
(particularly in areas with
draft angles) (common to
each result)
Provisional process
Not supported at this

time
Permanent remedy
There is no problem if the results
remain within tolerances, but if they
are outside tolerances, we want that
specified within the 3DAM drawings
as exempt from inspection etc.
Large errors in draft angles

Compare using PM5, as
necessary
CAD
No.
2-1
Product
category
Common
Measuri
ng
machine
Comm
on
conta
ctless
Color scale: 0.1
Issue
Provisional process
Color map display does not

support precision grades for
normal geometric tolerances
Create color maps with 3 grades

of tolerance, as specified
0.2
Permanent remedy
Make it possible to set the color
map display to the precision
grades of normal geometric
tolerances.
-> The time taken for color map
assessment can be cut (around
50 -> 5 minutes)
0.3
Automatic output in one time could save a large amount of time

CAD
No.
2-4
Product
category
Common
Measuri
ng
machin
e
Com
mon
conta
ctless
Issue
CAD PMI information can be

read from 3DAM, but the
assignment of target point
groups to each PMI is manual
Provisional process
Permanent remedy
Manually assign CAD features

and measurement point groups
If it becomes possible to
assign point group ranges
automatically from CAD data,
it would greatly reduce the
time required for calculating
dimensions and geometric
tolerances (30 -> 5 minutes)
If point group assignment to

PMI data could be automated
it would save a large amount
of time
CAD
3-4. Opinions from each workplace
1. Opinions from die design

2. Opinions from measurement and
assessment
CAD
Opinions from die design

Die design (opinions from 2 companies)
1 About PM3 models
Until now it too time to validate and correct mismatches between the 3D model and 2D drawings, so
it was not possible to start on die design immediately after obtaining the data. With the standards and
guidelines it is clear what range of the 3D data has been studied, so the use of 3DA models
eliminates the validation and correction of mismatches, which is a major advantage.
2 About geometric tolerances
The use of JEITA normal geometric tolerances in design specification by geometric tolerances makes
it possible to omit normal geometric tolerances and makes it easier to judge dimensions that require
particular care in die design.
3 About JT files
Viewers are important for the use and spread of 3DA models, and the appearance of JT files output
from multiple CAD systems can differ between viewers. With this and similar problems, there is still
cause for concern if it is not possible to prepare the same environment as that used by the data
supplier.
In future, we expect improved compatibility for JT files, but for the time being, measures such as
using captured images of specification content, which we use at present, appear to be necessary.
CAD
Opinions from measurement and assessment

1 About normal geometric tolerances
I think the characteristics of contactless measurement measuring machines able to
measure target objects as faces can be exploited to the greatest extent, so I want that
to be more widely used in future.
2 About geometric tolerances
The optimum measurement point identification methods, calculation methods, etc. do not
yet correspond to the unique methods employed by each company, so I think it is difficult
to make a simple comparison, but we are looking forward to measurement guidelines etc.
using geometric tolerances, with the cooperation of AIST etc.
3 About 3DAM
We were able to import PMI data relatively easily using our software, and I think that
was a very significant result. We want to put that to use in future development.
4 About PM3
We see the extent to which measuring machines can pick up design intentions on the
basis of the guidelines as an issue for the future. Areas which can be omitted on
drawings, such as repetitions and mold voids, are almost entirely not covered.
5 About JEITAs efforts
JEITA provides a forum for discussions between those in charge of design,
manufacturing, and inspection. If it could create rules that allow the preparation of
drawings that envisage manufacturing and inspection from the design stage, that would
provide major advantages for the measuring machine vendors in future.
CAD
Summary
Effects of operation according to the Die Process Linkage Guidelines on die design
[1] Reduction of Work quantity for die requirement checks
(parting lines/ extrusion positions/ flashing production potential/ draft angle position, etc.)
[2] Reduction of work quantity for comparison between 2D drawing and 3D data, and for
correction of mismatches
Effects of measurement and assessment according to the 3DA Model Guidelines and
the Measurement Guidelines Using 3DA Models
[1] The automatic import function for geometric tolerances from 3DAM eliminates the work
of data input to gauges. (Common to contact and contactless measurement)
[2] The automatic extraction function for target point groups eliminates the work of manual
assignment to features
[3] Compared to conventional measurement methods, normal input of geometric
tolerances and assessment of faces by contactless measurement reduces the
measurements and assessment points
CAD
Demonstration effects from these two parts

Product design (PM3)
Die design (TM2)
Die fabrication
Plastic molding
Measurement and
assessment (PM3, PM5)
(PM3)
Cutting
Casting
(PM5)
We will not be validating die

fabrication and molding at this
stage, so part fabrication will be by
cutting and casting
120
100
22~25%
Reduction effect
80
60
40
20
Optimum measurement
method and measurement
work quantity calculation
Die requirement incorporation rank

Incorporate the necessary items, of
the 49 PM3 items, into the design
- Mismatch
- Insert splitting
- Gate
positioning
- Parting line
-
Contactless measurement +
contact measurement + generalpurpose measurement
Checking with the product designer

Reduction of items
Die design work quantity

calculation
Incorpora
te PM3
(PM5)
120
100
80
21~45%
Reduction
effect
60
40
20
0
CAD
4 Future Schedules
1. Improvement and validation of improvement
points with reference to the issues and
problems identified in each guideline by the
Demonstration Working Group.
2 Validation of effects on product design

from operation of the 3DA Model Guidelines
(now in progress)
CAD
Website of the 3D CAD Data Standardization Committee
Japan Electronics and Information
CAD
71
Thank you very much for your attention

We are looking forward to your participation in the
activities of the 3D CAD Data Standardization
Committee!
JEITA standard ET-5101 3D Single Diagram Standard
http: //www.jeita.or.jp/japanese/public_standard/
JEITA 3DA Model Guidelines Ver3.1
JEITA 3D Single Diagram Die Process Linkage Guidelines V1.1
JEITA Measurement Guidelines Using 3DA Models V1.0

CAD
72
End
CAD

JEITA tcm1023-230648

Cargado por

Información del documento

Título original

Derechos de autor

Formatos disponibles

Compartir este documento

Compartir o incrustar documentos

Opciones para compartir

¿Le pareció útil este documento?

¿Este contenido es inapropiado?

Copyright:

Formatos disponibles

JEITA tcm1023-230648

Cargado por

Copyright:

Formatos disponibles

Toshiaki Takahashi, JEITA ISTEC, 2014.09.

Inspection of the guideline in the production field

Working validation of 3D-related

We will be introducing the following three JEITA

Refer to the following URL for details:

Logistics, sales, and maintenance (to the

Tool design and validation

Die design and machining guidelines

Logistics, sales, and maintenance (to the

Tool design and validation

Introducing the Japan Electronics and Information

JEITAs Policy and Strategy Board

> Number of full members: 279> Number of associate members:

Organization Diagram of the Japan Electronics and Information

Boards for each field

Steering Committee on Policy and

Committees for each topic

Safety Policy Committee

Electronic Components Board

Legal and Intellectual Property

Business to Business Electronic

What is the Japan Electronics and Information Technology Industries Association

3D CAD Data Standardization Committee?

As of May 2014: 17 full member companies, 7 associate member companies

JEITA: Japan Electronics and Information Technology Industries Association

Organization Chart of the 3D CAD Data

JEITA boards and committees

(As of May 2014)

Chair: Seiko Epson

3D CAD Data Standardization Committee

> Planning, extension activities, relations

Chief: Hitachi, Ltd. ... Takeda

> Deliberation on the JEITA standard for 3D single diagrams

Chief: Fuji Xerox, Shigeta

> Deliberation on usage of 3D data

Chief: Canon, Takahashi

> Validation of the effects and identified issues for each

2. The Purpose and Aim of the Working

2-1 The Purpose of working validation

2-2. Processes now

From documents provided by the JIS Development Committee

Logistics, sales, and maintenance

Mass production processes

Die design, tool design,

2-3. The Aim of the Working Validation

2-4 Working validation measures and work

Die design (TM2)

Measurement and assessment

Die requirement incorporation

Contactless measurement + contact

We will not be validating die

Checking with the product

2-5. Response to issues and problems

1. Dealing with issues and problems raised by the guidelines, as obtained

3 Results Obtained From the Working Validation

3-1. Product design validation results

1. The purpose of product design

2. Product design content

3-1-1. The purpose of product design validation, and

2. The purpose of product design validation

3-1-2. Product design content

1. Product design parts

Data transfer status