Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Proposal
S Krishnamurthy, Shyamal Roy, Sankarshan Basu1
INTRODUCTION
There are several ways through which a government can raise revenues to meet
its various expenses. It can impose taxes on income and income related assets
(direct taxes) and, on goods and services (indirect taxes); it can resort to non-tax
revenues through levies, fees, and penalties on various items and from dividends,
interest and profits received out of its various investments; it can also raise nondebt receipts through public sector disinvestments.
In India the principal source of government revenue is taxes. Of the total revenue
of the government, tax revenue accounts for about 80% and non-tax revenue,
about 20%. The contribution of non-debt capital receipts, as of now, is
inconsequential, though it is projected to grow in the coming years.
Within tax revenue, the share of direct taxes has grown over time. At the end of
2008-09, they contributed to 55% of total tax revenue. Clearly, direct taxes being
progressive, as GDP growth gathers momentum, government will rely increasingly
on direct tax collection to finance its activities.
However, everything is not right with direct taxes in India.
First, the direct tax-GDP ratio of about 6.5% in India is not only the lowest among
the BRIC countries, but it is also erratic. This could mean a) that the distribution of
income is highly skewed in favour of rich which, in turn, means that tax rates must
increase to bring about a better tax-GDP ratio and/or, b) there are a large number
of people who should be paying taxes are not doing so.
Second, while tax administration has improved over time, persistent arrears
indicate that this has not gone far enough. According to the CAG data2,
uncollected amount of taxes at the end of 2007-08 amounted to Rs 37,415 crores
or, 12% of total direct tax collection in that year.
www.nic.cag Ch.II, page 1 Union Audit Report- Compliance Audit (Direct Taxes) Report No.21 CA
of 2009 of CAG
computerization of Banks has been achieved by 31.3.20093 d) all the banks have
unique account number for each of the account holder; e) they also follow the
Basle II KYC (Know Your Customer) parameters before opening any bank account
i.e. whenever any money is received by the Bank on behalf of a customer, the
same is credited to the specific account with the unique identifying account
number.
The basic postulate is that the volume of bank transactions is several times more
than the so called taxable income of the tax-payer in a year. The new system,
thus, even at a modest rate, will bring more revenue to the government, besides
being easy to administer. Specifically:
1. Governments revenue target will be easily achieved
2. Tax payer will not be required to file returns and undergo assessments and all
their accompanying hassles.
3. The rate of tax will be just, equitable and broad based.
4. The method of collection will be simple and sustainable over a long period of
time.
5. The Government will receive tax on a daily basis while the tax-payer will pay
tax only on receipts and not on accruals.
www.rbi.org RBI report dated 22.10.09 Appendix Table IV.35Computerisation of Public Sector
Banks
www.finmin.nic.in Indian Public Finance Statistics 2008-09 published in Aug 2009by Economics
Division, MEA, Ministry of Finance
www.rbi.org RBI Table No.2.1. Population Group & Bank grouping as on 31.3.2008 dated
2.11.09
6
www.rbi.org RBI Current Statistics dt 11.01.2010 Table 8
7
Op cit, Table 9B
8
Op cit, Table 9A
9
Op cit ,Table 39A
10
Op cit, Table 44
11
The breakdown, in crores, is: Cheque clearances Rs10,264,610; Retail electronic payment
system Rs662,345; Large value clearing and settlement system Rs145,851,860; Foreign trade Rs
1,964,414; and Other forex inward remittances Rs 3,181,365
The table below lists out the comparison between the existing system and the
proposed system on various parameters:
Tax Collections:
1
5
6
Slabs of 10%, 20%, 30% after No slabs. 0.2% of any credit in banks. No
computation of
taxable computation(Rs.2.per Rs.1,000)
income
Capital Gains Computation
Nil
0.2% of forex is Governments
On accrual based
10
11
Payment defaults
12
Counter trade cannot escape Can escape but difficult & impractical
taxes
No default
Administration:
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
No Monthly Returns
No calculation & returns
Nil. No concept of zero tax
companies
Nil
No Assessments, No appeals &
litigation
20
21
Very easy
22
Nil
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
due
Cost of Collection:
30
to
income
CBDT after 338 lakh assessees, CBDT to redeploy to monitor 79,000
spending Rs. 4,000 crores
+ bank branches
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
Nil
The benefits of a switch from the existing system to the ABCD system can be
summarized as follows:
To start with, it will result in the government getting tax every day,
instead of monthly or quarterly. At the end of the year, if the ABCD rate
requires tweaking of the percentage, this can be done as the annual
budget exercise under alternative assumptions with respect to ABCD
percentage. With this system we can do away with the Income tax Act,
Rules, and Procedures etc.
Instead of 338 lakh assessees paying income tax now, under the ABCD
system, 6,800 lakh bank accounts will be paying tax. And every adult
Indian can proudly say that he is a tax payer.
Under the ABCD system any forex coming into India to anyones credit is
also subject to 0.2% tax, Hence, the government will also earn forex. There
will be no concept of NRI remittances etc from tax point of view. Any
credit to any account in any currency will be subject to ABCD. This means
out of nearly annual receipt of around 20 Billion U$ received, the
government will get a revenue of 4 million U$ in forex. Needless to say,
such ABCD forex when converted to INR and credited to the same account
holder will not suffer tax again.
7
The entire staff of more than 60,000 personnel in the income tax
department can now be re-deployed to monitor 78,000+ bank branches.
Since the entire system is automated, they will not have much of problem
of monitoring the collection of ABCD tax.
When the tax collection is on daily, actual cash basis, the government
requirement of borrowing and paying high interest will also come down
(and also the litigation).
IT deputees also will ensure that credits arising out of branch transfer in
the same bank by the same account holder is not taxed and also that the
inter-branch transfers of the same bank to their own account and also the
money market transactions are not taxed.
SUMMING UP ON ABCD
Imagine a world where no one has to file Income tax return, claim breaks,
deductions, refunds etc and at the same time he is able to proudly claim that he
is a tax payer. Imagine a world where there is no requirement of income tax
consultant, auditor, inspector or IRS official running after or chasing a citizen for
tax. Also imagine a world where governments are able to get revenue as
required for meeting the various needs of the people, be it defense, social
security, health care or whatever. It is now possible to make it a reality through
the introduction of ABCD system. If not immediate implementation, there is at
least an immediate need to generate a debate on the suggested system.
Question may, of course, arise that if the benefits of ABCD system are so obvious
why it was not adopted earlier? The answer is that automated banking system,
well regulated by federal authorities, was not in place earlier to think in this
direction. Thanks to the Information Technology revolution and fairly well
8