Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
with an individual's ability to understand both spoken and written language, as well as their
ability to speak and write themselves. In a practical sense, linguistic intelligence is the extent to
which an individual can use language, both written and verbal, to achieve goals.[1]In addition to
this, high linguistic intelligence has been linked to improved problem solving, as well as to
increased abstract reasoning.[2]
In many cases, only the verbal aspects are taken into consideration. This is usually referred to
as verbal intelligence or verbal fluency, and is commonly a reflection of an individual's overall
linguistic intelligence.
Semantic Fluency Test - Subjects are asked to produce words in groups, such as
animals, kitchen tools, fruits, etc. This type of test focuses on the subject's ability to
generate words that have meaning to them. This test has been found to be sensitive to age.
[12]
Formal Fluency Test - Subjects are asked to produce words given specific letter-based
rules. This test has been found to be sensitive to education level. [12]
Initial Letter Fluency Test - A type of formal fluency test where the subject is
asked to list words starting with a specific letter.[12]
Excluded Letter Fluency Test - A type of formal fluency test where the subject is
asked to list words that do not contain a certain letter.[12]
Verb Fluency Test - Subjects are asked to list verbs. Subjects are then tested on their
ability to use listed verbs.[12]
Verbal Reproduction Test - Subjects are asked to listen to a monologue. They are then
asked to repeat the monologue, and the subject is scored based on the number of words
and lemmas used from the original monologue.[1]
Possible conflict[edit]
Recently, a study was done showing that verbal fluency test results can differ depending on the
mental focus of the subject. In this study, mental focus on physical speech
production mechanisms caused speech production times to suffer, whereas mental focus
onauditory feedback improved these times.[14]
Injuries[edit]
Damage and injury in the brain can severely lower ones ability to communicate, and therefore
lower ones linguistic intelligence. Common forms of major damage
are strokes, concussions, brain tumors, viral/bacterial damage, and drug-related damage. The
three major linguistic disorders that result from these injuries are aphasia, alexia, and agraphia.
[7]
Aphasia is the inability to speak, and can be caused by damage to Broca's area or the motor
cortex.[7] Alexia is the inability to read, which can arise from damage to Wernicke's area, among
other places.[7] Agraphia is the inability to write which can also arise from damage to Broca's
area or the motor cortex.[7]In addition, damage to large areas of the brain can result in any
combinations of these disorders, as well as a loss of other abilities. [7]
each capability with an occupational role at the workplace, for examples: for those individuals
with linguistic intelligence he pointed journalists, speakers and trainers; scientist, engineers,
financiers and accountants on logical-mathematical intelligence; sales people, managers,
teachers and counselors on thepersonal intelligence; athletes, contractors and actors on bodilykinesthetic intelligence; taxonomists, ecologist and veterinarians onnaturalistic intelligence;
clergy and philosophers on existential intelligence and designers, architects and taxi drivers
on spatialintelligence.[1]