Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
-1
Key words: Barley landraces, Genetic diversity, Hordeum vulgare spp. vulgare, Uttaranchal Himalaya
Abstract
In the high altitude areas of western Himalaya, barley is a crop of marginal, low input drought stressed
environments. The landraces grown in these areas are favoured for their quality, both as grain and straw.
However, area under the naked barley landraces, during the last three to four decades, has declined
considerably and their ex situ and in situ conservation requires attention. Morphological and RAPD
descriptors of a collection of 70 landraces from the higher Himalayan ranges of Uttaranchal state were used
to analyse levels of genetic diversity. A wide range of variation was recorded for various morphological
characters in univariate analysis. The multivariate analysis based on six quantitative traits distinguished
accessions from dierent geographical areas in the region but failed to separate naked from covered
barleys. Clustering based on qualitative traits, however, clearly distinguished naked and covered forms.
RAPD proles eciently dierentiated naked barleys from covered forms, but could not dierentiate
between oriental and occidental covered forms. A set of 11 predominant landraces were subjected to
detailed population genetic analysis. More diversity was observed in covered barleys than the naked forms,
both for morphological and RAPD markers. The low diversity in naked barley populations was attributed
to either genetic drift or to a founder eect, while the high diversity in covered barley populations was
attributed to their large-scale cultivation for animal feed and brewing purposes. Allelic combinations were
not randomly distributed, as a geographic trend was closely related to covered and naked barleys. Since
naked barleys are poorly represented in the national collections, a systematic collection from the entire
region is suggested. The genetic dierences between covered and naked barleys may be relevant to breeding
programmes since the variability created through hybridisation between the contrasting forms could be
exploited.
Introduction
Cultivated barley (Hordeum vulgare ssp. vulgare) is
one of the oldest of cultivated plants (Harlan 1968)
and has been grown in India since ancient times.
The origin of cultivated barley is disputed. Aberg
(1940) postulated that the six-rowed wild barley
(H. vulgare ssp. agriocrithon) found in Tibet was
2
in Southwest Asia originated from ssp. spontaneum. In a recent study, Badr et al. (2000) demonstrated that barley was rst brought into culture in
the Fertile Crescent, and that the Himalayas is a
diversication region of domesticated barley.
Cultivated barleys are classied as hulled, in which
the lemma and palea are fused to the pericarp, and
naked, in which the cha is easily separated from
the grain. Where barley forms a major part of the
human diet, naked types are preferred. The widespread distribution of naked barley makes the
hulled or naked caryopsis character a key trait to
follow the origin and domestication process of
barley (Harlan 1995; Salamini et al. 2002). A recent study (Taketa et al. 2004) indicates that
naked barley has a monophyletic origin, probably
in southwestern Iran, and all naked barleys are
likely to share a common ancestor.
In India, barley is cultivated over ca. 3 million ha, mainly in the north Indian plains but also
in the hilly regions of the Himalayas, up to an
elevation of around 4000 m. In the Himalayas, the
six-rowed covered types are common, and tworowed types, both covered and naked, are grown
only to a limited extent. Cultivation of the sixrowed naked forms is conned to the higher
Himalayan ranges. In the high altitude areas of the
western Himalaya, barley is generally a crop of
marginal, low input drought stressed environments. The landraces grown in these areas are favoured by farmers for their quality, both as grain
and straw. However, the area under the naked
barley landraces, which were very popular and
widely grown in higher Himalayan ranges three to
four decades ago, has declined considerably and
their ex-situ and in-situ conservation now requires
attention.
Although some information is available with
regard to the phylogeny and evolution of Himalayan barleys, there is only limited knowledge of
the genetic diversity present in the traditional
landraces. The present study was carried out in
order to:
1. Estimate the extent of the genetic diversity in
landraces using morphological and molecular
characterisation data.
2. Assess the extent of diversity within and between populations with a view to devise strategies
for their ex situ and in situ (on-farm) conservation.
No. of
accessions
Hulled
(covered)
Hull-less
(naked)
Elevational
ranges (m)
Almora
Bageshwar
Chamolib
Champawat
Nainital
Pithoragarhb
Rudraprayag
Tehrib
Uttarkashi
Total
8
1
5
1
3
25
10
9
8
70
8
1
4
1
3
20
10
9
8
64
13001800
1400
15002000
1500
15001800
13004500
13001600
15002000
15002000
3
Table 2. Descriptors recorded for morphological characterisation of barley landraces.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
4
Table 3. Range of variation for various morphological traits in barley landraces.
Descriptors
Min.
Max.
Kurtosis
Skewness
Mean
SD
SE
CV
Quantitative traits
Delhi location
1. Days to owering
2. Days to maturity
3. Number of tillers
4. Plant height
5. 100-seed wt.
6. Yield/plant
78.0
121.0
7.0
83.0
2.1
5.3
110.0
139.0
38.0
128.0
4.3
47.5
2.25a
0.42
1.09
0.55
0.50
2.09a
1.36a
0.61a
1.03a
0.27
0.15
1.19a
98.11
129.77
16.41
109.20
3.35
18.77
6.24
3.27
5.61
9.02
0.39
6.68
0.51
0.27
0.46
0.74
0.03
0.54
6.36
2.51
34.19
8.25
11.66
35.62
Bhowali location
1. Days to owering
2. Days to maturity
3. Number of tillers
4. Plant height
5. 100-seed wt.
6. Yield/plant
124.0
163.0
3.0
66.8
1.6
2.5
151.0
185.0
15.0
95.5
5.2
13.8
1.77a
1.26a
1.09
0.04
0.13
0.18
0.75a
0.10
1.03a
0.03
0.33
0.39
134.56
169.79
7.41
81.84
3.01
7.34
4.61
3.73
2.87
6.90
0.71
2.37
0.38
0.31
0.46
0.57
0.06
0.19
3.43
2.20
38.73
8.44
23.57
32.28
Qualitative traits
7. Growth class: All spring types (100%)
8. Row number or lateral orets: All six rowed (100%)
9. Spike density:1 (lax)=45.3%; 2 (intermediate)=41.3%; 3 (dense)=13.4%
10. Spikelet groups (triplet) per spike: 1 (<20):6.7%; 2 (2030)=77.3%; 3(>30)=16%
11. Hoodedness/awnedness: 4 (awns on all rows)=92%; 5 (awns on central rows only)=8%
12. Awn roughness: Predominantly smooth (97%)
13. Length of rachilla hairs: 1 (short)=46.7%; 2 (long)=53.3%
14. Kernel covering: 1 (naked grains)=8%; 2 (covered grains)=92%
15. Lemma colour: 1 (white/brown)=88%; 2 (purple/black)=12%
16. Grain (pericarp) colour: 1 (white)=88%; 2 (blue)=1.3%; 3 (black)=10.7%
a
Signicant at p 0.01.
Cluster I
Cluster II
Cluster III
Delhi location
Days to owering
Days to maturity
Plant height
No. of tillers
100-seed weight
Yield/plant
No. of accessions
91.22
126.28
107.31
19.35
3.27
18.16
23
100.44
131.17
106.96
14.15
3.53
22.23
32
102.33
131.17
106.96
15.22
3.13
13.93
20
Bhowali location
Days to owering
Days to maturity
Plant height
No. of tillers
100-seed weight
Yield/plant
No. of accessions
131.52
167.13
85.43
19.35
3.27
6.45
28
135.14
170.91
79.20
14.15
2.52
7.30
35
140.08
173.04
80.49
15.22
3.70
9.47
12
Figure 1. Wards minimum variance dendrogram of 75 barley accessions based on quantitative traits at Delhi location (*landraces
selected for population genetic studies, N = naked (hull-less) landraces).
6
Table 5. Principal components analysis using quantitative
traits of barley landraces.
PC axes
Total variation
explained
%
Characters
weightings
with
high
Cumulative
Delhi location
I
38.68
38.68
II
25.33
64.10
III
18.06
82.16
Bhowali location
I
41.54
41.54
II
23.48
65.03
III
15.84
80.88
Results
Morphological characterisation
Univariate analysis
The ANOVA revealed signicant dierences for
all the quantitative variables. All accessions owered and matured early at Delhi, and produced
more yield per plant and a greater 100-seed weight
compared to those at Bhowali (Table 3). GE
interaction was signicant, with signicant dierences between locations being observed for days to
owering, days to maturity and 100-seed weight.
Therefore, no pooled analysis was possible for
these characters. Pooled analysis was performed
for plant height and yield per plant, and this revealed that the performance of the landraces differed across the locations. The distribution of yield
per plant, number of tillers and 100-seed weight
among the quantitative traits was skewed, in both
the positive and negative directions. For the
qualitative traits, diversity was revealed for spike
density, spikelet groups (triplets) per spike, length
Figure 2. Weighted average linkage dendrogram of 75 barley accessions (including 5 check varieties) based on qualitative traits.
8
Table 6. Comparison of bands generated with RAPD primers.
Primers with DNA sequence
OPN-16 (AAGCGACCTG)
OPN-17 (CATTGGGGAG)
OPN-19 (GTCCGTACTG)
OPO-7 (CAGCACTGAC)
OPO-11 (GACAGGAGGT)
OPO-18 (CTCGCTATCC)
Total
4
4
5
5
4
4
26
2
1
1
3
3
3
13
50
25
20
60
75
75
50.0
OPO-9
OPO-20
OPN-19
OPN-1
Total
7
10
8
11
36
4
9
7
10
30
57.10
90.00
87.50
90.91
83.33
are the most easily discriminated based on qualitative traits. Cluster III mainly comprised covered
barleys with black lemma/grain colour from high
altitude areas of Pithoragarh district. The majority
of the accessions in cluster I were from higher
elevation zones of Uttaranchal state, whereas in
cluster II majority of the accessions belonged to
mid elevation zones.
RAPD proling
Of the 20 decamer primers selected, six were
informative (Table 6), generating 26 bands of size
range 2001800 bp, of which 13 were polymorphic. Percent polymorphism ranged from 20 to
75% with two primers (OPO-11 and OPO-18)
displaying 75% polymorphism. Genetic similarities between the accessions is presented as a dendrogram (Figure 3). Cluster I comprised 68
accessions, mainly covered barleys. Cluster II
comprised 4 naked barleys. One naked barley (IC356114) and two check varieties VLB-1 and DL-85
did not cluster in either groups and were the most
diverse. One naked barley accession from Chamoli
clustered with covered barleys in cluster I. Bootstrap analysis of RAPD data indicated less than
50% support for the major nodes of the clusters.
This indicated that the branches were not strongly
supported and there is a need to add more number
of markers. No distinct association between clustering pattern and area of collection was found,
but brittle and non-brittle rachis were clearly separated (Figure 4). The diversity among accessions
in general appears to be low as indicated by the
similarity co-ecient values between various
accessions.
Four primers, two each from OPO and OPN
series, were used to detect within population
diversity. Of the 36 bands generated, 30 were
polymorphic. The percent polymorphism ranged
from 57.1 to 87.5% (Table 7). The number of alleles per locus was estimated by simple counting.
The number of alleles per locus ranged from 1.05
(IC-260864) to 1.45 (IC-356093) with overall
population average of 1.25 alleles per locus. The
overall population genetic diversity was greater in
the eight landraces from Munsyari valley in
Pithoragarh district than in the three landraces
from other areas (one from Chamoli and two from
Tehri district). Covered barleys were more diverse
than naked barleys (Table 8).
Discussion
The study revealed variation among the barley
landraces for all six quantitative traits studied. The
naked barleys were generally poor yielding at both
test locations. The set of accessions under study
Figure 3. UPGMA dendrogram of 75 barley accessions (including 5 check varieties) based on RAPD data.
10
Table 8. Summary diversity analysis of selected barley landraces.
Diversity parameters
Munsyari populations
Other populations
Covered barleys
Naked barleys
Whole population
1.262
0.097
1.1997
0.085
1.293
0.106
1.114
0.060
1.250
0.094
11
covered and naked barleys would have potential to
unlock novel variation following the hybridisation
of contrasting forms.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Dr. B.S. Dhillon, Director,
NBPGR for providing facilities for the work.
Thanks are also due to the Ocer-in-Charge and
other scientists working on barley germplasm at
NBPGR Regional Station, Bhowali (Uttaranchal)
for helping in eld evaluation of barley landraces
at Bhowali location. Financial support in the form
of scholarship received from Indian Council of
Agricultural Research for M.Sc. degree is duly
acknowledged by the senior author.
References
Aberg E. 1940. The taxonomy and phylogeny of Hordeum L.
sect. Cerealia. Ands. Symbolae Bot. Upsalienses 4: 1156.
Badr A., Muller K., Schafer-Pregl R., El Rabey H., Egen S.,
Ibrahim H.H., Pozzi C., Rohde W. and Salamini F. 2000. On
The origin and domestication history of barley (Hordeum
vulgare). Mol. Biol. Evol. 17: 499510.
Freisleben R. 1940. Die phylogenetische Bedeutung asiatischer
Gersten. Der Z}
uchter 12: 257272.