Está en la página 1de 2

130 Superconductivity

More to Explore
Ford, P. J. The Rise of Superconductors. New York: CRC Press, 2005.
Gale Reference. Biography: Heike Kamerlingh Onnes. New York: Gale Research,
2004.
Lampton, Christopher. Superconductors. Berkeley Heights, NJ: Enslow, 1997.
Matricon, Jean. The Cold Wars: A History of Superconductivity. New Brunswick, NJ:
Rutgers University Press, 2003.
Shachtman, T. Absolute Zero and the Conquest of Cold. New York: Houghton Mifflin,
1999.

Atomic Bonding
Year of Discovery: 1913
What Is It? The first working theory of how electrons gain, lose, and hold energy and how they orbit the nucleus of an atom.
Who Discovered It? Niels Bohr

Why Is This One of the 100 Greatest?


Marie Curie opened the century by proving that there was a subatomic world. Einstein,
Dirac, Heisenberg, Born, Rutherford, and others provided the new theoretical descriptions
of this subatomic world. But proving what lurked within an atoms shell, and what governed its behavior, lingered as the great physics challenges of the early twentieth century.
It was Niels Bohr who discovered the first concrete model of the electrons surrounding
an atoms nucleustheir placement, motion, radiation patterns, and energy transfers.
Bohrs theory solved a number of inconsistencies and flaws that had existed in previous attempts to guess at the structure and activity of electrons. He combined direct experiment
with advanced theory to create an understanding of electrons. It was an essential step in
sciences march into the nuclear age.

How Was It Discovered?


Niels Bohr was only 26 in 1912very young to step into the middle of a heated physics controversy. But that spring, as a new physics professor at the University of Copenhagen, Bohr realized atomic theory no longer matched the growing body of experimental
atomic data. One of Bohrs experiments showed that classical theories predicted that an orbiting electron would continuously lose energy and slowly spiral into the nucleus. The atom
would collapse and implode. But that didnt happen. Atoms were amazingly stable. Something was wrong with the existing theoriesand Bohr said so.
There was no way to actually see an atom, no way to peer inside and directly observe
what was going on. Scientists had to grope in the dark for their theories, sifting through indirect clues for shreds of insight into the bizarre workings of atoms.
Atomic experimenters were building mountains of data. They recorded the particles
created from atomic collisions. They measured the angles at which these new particles
raced away from the collision site. They measured electrical energy levels. But few of these
data fit with atomic theories.

131

También podría gustarte