DI S I R I BUTI ON SHEET

To

From

D i s t r i b u t i on

B. L. Coverdell
Equipment Stress Analysis

I EDT No.

Project T i tle/Work Order

ANALYSIS OF LIFTING BEAM AND REDESIGNED LIFTING LUG FOR
241AZ01A DECANT PUMP / E18146

Name

T. J . Conrads
B. L. Coverdell
R. B. Pan
T. W. Staehr
Central F i l e s (2)

A-6000-135 (01/93) WEF067

Text
With
MSIN
A1 1
Attach
H5- 53
H5-53
H5-53
R3-27
L8- 04

Text

On1y

142167

ECN No.

Attach.
/
Appendi
X

Only

EDT/ECN

On1y

DISCLAIMER
Portions of this document may be illegible
in electronic image products. Images are
produced from the best available original
document.

DE

-.&

a#-

14 1994 %@GINEERlNG

I
142187

Page I of

DATA TRANSMllTAL

1.EDT

ved Wconment

21. DOE APPROVAL ( i f required)

T. U. S

Date
Originator

C t r l . No.
13 Approved

for Receiving
- Organization
-

11 Approved m/comnents
13 Disapproved w/comnents
I

ED-7400-172-2( 0 4 / 9 4 ) GEF097
BD-7400-17 2- 1 (02189)

RELEASE AUTHORIZATION

Document Number:

WHC-SD-WM-DA-179,

REV. 0

Document Title:

Analysis o f L i f t i n g Beam and Redesigned L i f t i n g Lugs

for 241-AZ-01A Decant Pump

Release Date:

12/14/94

This document was reviewed following the

procedures described in WHC-CM-3-4 and is:

APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE

WHC information Release Administration Specialist:

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER.
Reference herein t o any specific carmercial product, process, or service by trade
name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply i t s endorsement,
recomnendation, or favoring by the United States Governnent or any agency thereof o r i t s contractors or
subcontractors.

This report has been reproduced from the best available copy. Available i n paper copy and microfiche.
Printed i n the U n i t e d States of America. Available t o the U.S. Department of Energy and i t s contractors
f run:
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of S c i e n t i f i c and Technical Information (OSTI)
P.O. Box 62
Oak Ridge, TN 37831
Telephone: (615) 576-8401
Available t o the public from:

Department of Comnerce
National Technical Information Service (NTIS)
5285 Port Royal Road
Springfield, VA 22161
Telephone: (703) 487-4650
U.S.

DISCLAIMER

A-6001-400.2

<09/94)UEF256

This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States
Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their
employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or
process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark,
manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views
and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the
United States Government or any agency thereof.

4 / #

SUPPORTING DOCUMENT
2.

Title

ANALYSIS OF LIFTING BEAM AND REDESIGNED

LUGS FOR 241-AZ-01A DECANT PUMP

5.

Key Uords

Lifting Beam
Lifting Lug
Analysis
24 1AZO1 A
Decant Pump
7.

LIFTING

1.

3.

Total Pages

4. Rev No.

Nunber

WHC-SD-WM-DA-179
6.
N-:

Author

B. L. Coverdell

&A

Signature

Organization/Charge Code

Abstract

E 181 4 6

This supporting document details calculations for the proper design of a

lifting beam and redesigned lifting lugs for the 241AZ01A decant pump. T h i s design
is in accordance with Standard Architectural-Civil Design Criteria, Design Loads f o r
Faci7ites (DOE-RL 1989) and is safety class three. The design and fabrication is in
accordance with American Institute of Steel Construction. Manua? o f Steel

a.

A-6400-073 (08/94)UEFU4

RELEASE STAMP

WHC -SD- WM-DA- 179

Rev. 0

ANALYSIS OF LIFTING BEAM AND REDESIGNED LIFTING LUGS FOR 241AZ01A DECANT PUMP

November 15. 1994

PREPARED BY:

&. d,

/ / - - a n -$L;/

B. L. Coverdell , Advanced Engineer

Equipment Stress Analysis

REVIEWED BY:*&

II

/ 30/f4

J . S. BurgessfAdvanced Engineer

Equipment Stress Analysi s

APPROVED BY:

a/

1211[4

/?Pf'0

B. Pan, Manager

Equipment Stress Analysi s

Westinghouse Hanford Company

Hanford Operations and Engi neeri ng Contractor
for the
U. S . Department of Energy.

WHC-SD-WM-DA- 179
Rev. 0

DESIGN VERIFICATION METHOD

The need f o r design v e r i f i c a t i o n has been reviewed with the method selected as
indicated below: (ESR/Work Plan # NA / WP - 8D430-331.
X

Independent Review
Alternate Calculations
Qualification Testing
Formal Design Revi ew

Cogni zant f l r oj e c t /Des ign Manager

SD #WHC-SD-WM-DA- 179

ECN

NA

DWG(S1 #

ii

W HC - SD- W M - DA - 179
Rev. 0

CHECKLIST FOR INDEPENDENT REVIEW

Document Reviewed ANALYSIS OF I-IFTING BEAM AND REDESIGNED L IFTING LUG FOR 241AZOlA DECANT

PUMP

Author R . L. Coverdell

Problem completely defined.

Necessary assumpti ons expl ic i t l y stated and supported.
Computer codes and data f i l e s documented.

c4 C I [ I

C d C I c1

[,I

1 L-4

D a t a used i n calculations e x p l i c i t l y stated i n document.

Data checked f o r consistency w i t h o r i g i n a l source information as

applicable.
M a thematical der iv a t ions checked incl udi ng d i mensi ona 1 consi stency o f
results .
Models appropriate and used w i t h i n range o f v a l i d i t y or use outside
range of established v a l i d i t y j u s t i f i e d .
Hand calculations checked f o r errors.
Code run streams correct and consistent w i t h analysis documentation.
Code output consistent w i t h input and with r e s u l t s reported i n analysis
documentat ion.
Acceptabi 1it y 1i m i t s on analytical results appl icable and supported.
Limits checked against sources.
Safety margins consistent with good engineering practices.

Conclusions consistent w i t h analytical results and applicable l i m i t s .

Results and conclusions address a l l points required i n the problem
statement.
MANDATORY

Software QA Log Number

9"/-fl70

J . S. Buraess &W

f//L9

Revi ewe?

iii

/v4

Date

WHC-SD-WM-DA-179
Rev. 0

ENGINEERING ANALYSIS SOFTWARE REPORT FORM

77-D7D

November 15. 1994

DATE ANALYSIS PERFORMED
SOFTWARE APPLICATION:

SOFTWARE LOG NUMBER

COSMOS/M ver 1.70.

I/- ,sip/
- -PY

B. L. Coverdell, Equipment Stress Analysis

ANALYST

DATE

. Pan, Equipment Stress Analysis

DATE

DESCRIPTION OF ANALYSIS:
The use o f the finite-element (FE) analysis program CUSIYOS/M version 1.70
(SRAC 1994) permitted a quick, easy, and detailed stress analysis o f the following
components of t h e 241AZ01A l i f t i n g beam: the top lug, the I-beam and gusset plates
and bottom lugs. These analysis are called TOP LUG02, LBEAM02 and BOlTOM LUG01
respectively. Each o f these analysis used triangular elements t o determine the
stresses developed by the 5,442 kg (6 ton) load.
The FE analysis was performed on a S i l i c o n Graphics Incorporated, Indigo
computer. Electronic copies o f the input and output f i l e s can be found on t h e
attached tape and on the Common F i l e Storage (CFS) i n the directory w81423/24lazOla.

J . S. Burgess
REV IEWER,

/&

I 1 /.-?e/
9d

/
,
-

DATE

iv

WHC - SD - WM - DA- 179

Rev. 0

C O N T E N T S
1.0

Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2.0

Summary o f Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.0

Discussion.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.0

Conclusions

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.0

Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6.0 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

APPENDICES
Appendix A

C a l cul a t i ons

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

A- 1

Appendix B

von Mises stress p l o t s o f the l i f t i n g beam components:

Top L i f t i n g Lug, I-Beam and Gusset Plates. and Lower
L i f t i n g Lug . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

B-1

WHC-SD-WM-DA-179
Rev. 0

1.0 . INTRODUCTION
Thi s analysis determines whether the 241AZ01A decant pump 1if t i ng beam
design i s adequate given the pump weight o f 5,442 kg (12,000 1b) . The
analysi s a1so determines the adequacy o f the redesigned 241AZ01A 1ifti ng 1ugs
given t h a t the e x i s t i n g ones are inadequate due t o clearance problems.
The 241AZOlA decant pump l i f t i n g beam was separated i n t o two sections
f o r analysis purposes. The top section was divided i n t o three components,
which are: the top l i f t i n g lug, the I-Beam and gusset plates, and the (4)
lower l i f t i n g lugs. The lower section i s also divided i n t o three components:
the connecting p i n , the v e r t i c a l bar, and the l i f t i n g hook. For more
information on the l i f t i n g beam, reference drawing H-2-83761 Rev. 0
(WHC 1994a). A finite-element (FE) analysis was completed on t h e three
components comprising the top section o f the l i f t i n g beam. Hand calculations
were used t o determine the adequacy o f the lower section o f the l i f t i n g beam
and the redesigned 241AZ01A l i f t i n g lugs. For more information on the
redesi gned 241AZ01A 1ifti ng 1ugs , reference drawing H-2-820775 Rev. 0
(WHC 1994b) and ECN# 704915 (WHC 1 9 9 4 ~ ) .
Both the l i f t i n g beam and redesigned 241AZ01A l i f t i n g lugs are i n
accordance w i t h Standard Architectura7-Civi7 Design Criteria, Design Loads for
Faci7ities (DOE-RL 1993) and are safety class 3. The design and f a b r i c a t i o n
o f each component i s i n accordance w i t h American I n s t i t u t e o f Steel
Construction, Manua 7 of Stee7 Construction, (AISC 1989) and the /fanford
Hoisting and Rigging Manua7 (DOE-RL 1993).

2.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS

The calculations i n Appendix A determined t h a t the maximum allowable
bending, shear, and bearing stresses are 148.8 MPa (21,600 l b / i n 2 ) , 148.8 MPa
(21,600 l b / i n 2 ) , and 223,2 MPa (32,400 l b / i n 2 ) respectively. The maximum
allowable stresses were determined from the Manua7 of Stee7 Construction
(AISC 1989). The maximum von Mises stresses f o r each o f the three components
comprising the top section o f the l i f t i n g beam are p l o t t e d i n Appendix B. The
p l o t s show the maximum von Mises stresses are 62.77 MPa (9,110 l b / i n 2 ) f o r the
top l i f t i n g lug, 26.53 MPa (3,850 l b / i n 2 ) f o r the I-Beam and gusset plates,
and 37.90 MPa (5,500 l b / i n 2 ) for the lower l i f t i n g lugs. The hand
calculations i n Appendix A determined t h a t the maximum stress i n the lower
section of the l i f t i n g beam i s 68.23 MPa (9,903 l b / i n 2 ) and occurs i n t h e
center o f the p i n connecting the lower l i f t i n g l u g and the v e r t i c a l bar.
1

WHC-SD-WM-DA-179
Rev. 0
Appendix A also contains calculations showing the maximum stress f o r the
redesigned 241AZ01A l i f t i n g lug. The maximum stress f o r t h i s component was
determined t o be 59.21 MPa (8,594 l b / i n 2 ) and occurs due t o bending i n t h e
5.08-cm ( 2 - i n ) diameter pin.

3.0 DISCUSSION
The l i f t i n g beam and the redesigned 241AZ01A l i f t i n g lugs analyzed i n
t h i s document are t o be used f o r hoisting the 241AZ01A decant pump. The
l i f t i n g beam was divided i n t o two sections f o r analysis purposes. A FE
analysis was performed on the three components comprising the top section.
These components are:
0
0
0

top l i f t i n g l u g
I-Beam and gusset plates
lower l i f t i n g lug.

DOE-RL 1992 requires a factor o f safety o f three f o r a l l below-the-hook

l i f t i n g devices. For each o f the three FE models, the maximum von Mises
stresses were obtained from the stress p l o t s depicted i n Appendix B. These
maximum stresses then were compared t o the allowable stress o f 82,68 MPa
(12,000 l b / i n 2 ) . The maximum stresses f o r the top lug, I-Beam and gusset
plates, and lower l i f t i n g l u g are 62.77 MPa (9,110 l b / i n 2 ) , 26.53 MPa
(3,850 l b / i n 2 ) and 37.90 MPa (5,500 l b / i n * ) , respectively.
1

The lower section o f the l i f t i n g beam was analyzed using hand

calculations. These calculations are shown i n Appendix A. The components o f
the lower section are:
0
0
0

p i n connecting the lower lug and v e r t i c a l bar

v e r t i c a l bar
1ifti ng hook.

The remaining components o f the l i f t i n g beam were analyzed w i t h hand

calculations (Appendix A). The maximum stress i n the l i f t i n g beam, found i n
the p i n between the lower l u g and the v e r t i c a l bar, i s 68.23 MPa
(9,903) l b / i n 2 .
Appendix A also contains calculations showing the maximum stress i n the
redesigned 241AZ01A l i f t i n g lug. The maximum stress i s 59.21 MPa
(8.594 l b / i n 2 ) and was found i n the 5.08-cm ( 2 - i n . ) diameter p i n .

WHC - SD - WM - DA- 179

Rev. 0

4.0 CONCLUSIONS
The calculations i n Appendix A and the stress p l o t s i n Appendix B show
t h a t t h e l i f t i n g beam and the redesigned 241AZ01A l i f t i n g l u g are adequate as
shown i n drawing H-2-83761 (WHC 1994aL drawing H-2-820775 (WHC 1994b) and i n
ECN# 704915 (WHC 1 9 9 4 ~ ) .

5.0 REQUIREMENTS
Below i s a l i s t o f requirements that. must be met f o r t h i s l i f t i n g beam
t o conform t o DOE-RL 1992:

The drawi ng number, drawi ng revision number, weight and hoi s t i ng

capacity must be painted on the l i f t i n g beam.
The l i f t i n g beam must be welded and inspected per American Welding
Society D 1 . l (AWS 1994).
The l i f t i n g beam must load tested t o 125% o f i t s rated capacity.

With t h e above requirements met, the l i f t i n g beam i s adequate f o r hoisting o f

the 241AZ01A decant pump.
The only requirement f o r the redesigned 241AZ01A l i f t i n g l u g i s t h a t i t
must be welded and inspected per AWS 1994. The redesigned 241AZ01A l i f t i n g
l u g need not be load tested since i t i s not considered a below t h e hook
l i f t i n g device per DOE-RL 1992. The redesigned 241AZ01A l i f t i n g lug, i n t h i s
case, i s considered t o be p a r t o f the object t o be hoisted.

W HC- SD - W M - DA- 179

Rev. 0

6.0 REFERENCES
AISC, 1989, Manua 7 o f Stee7 Construction, Ninth Edition, American I n s t i t u t e o f
Steel Construction, Chicago, I l l i n o i s .
AWS , 1994, Structura 7 We7ding Code, AWS D1.1, Ameri can We1d i ng Soci e t y ,
M i ami , F1o r i da .

DOE-RL, 1993. Standard Architectura7-Civi7 Design C r i t e r i a , Design

Loads f o r F a c i l i t i e s , DOE-RL-SDC 4.1 Revision 12. Westinghouse Hanford
Company, R i chl and, Washington .
DOE-RL, 1992, Hanford S i t e Hoisting and Rigging Manua7, DOE-RL-92-36, U.S.
Department o f Energy, Richland Operations Office, Richland, Washington
SRAC, 1994, COSMOSIM, Structural Research and Analysis Corporation,
Version 1.70, Santa Monica , Cal if o r n i a.
WHC, 1994a. L i f t i n g Beam, drawing H-2-83761 Rev. 0, Westinghouse Hanford
Company, R i chl and, Washington.
WHC, 1994b. Piping 241 -AZ-OlA Decant Pump Adapter F7ange, drawing
H-2-820775 Rev. 0, Westi nghouse Hanford Company, R i chl and, Washington.

WHC , 1 9 9 4 ~ .ECN# 704915, Westi nghouse Hanford Company, R i chl and, Washi ngton .

WHC-SD-WM-DA-179
Rev. 0

Appendix A
Calculations

A-1

WHC-SD-WM- DA- 179

Rev. 0
Calculation Cover Sheet

Subject:

Originator:

&.rii,

/
/
e

B. L. Coverdell , Advanced Engineer

Checker:

A- 2

38- ?+

Date

Checker:

Date:

WHC-SD-WM-DA-179 Rev. 0

From the figure on the previous page and given that the maximum load on the pin will be less than or equal
to 6000 Ibf, the maximum shear and moment can be determined using the following equations. From the
maximum shear and moment calculations the maximum shear bending stresses can be determined. The
interaction of these two stresses must also be checked. The AlSC Manual of Steel Construction was used
to determine the allowable stresses. These allowables are shown below.
Allowable stress calculations for A36 CS.
lbf
36000.1
in

The yield stress for A36 CS

.6*F

lbf
F t=21600*-

F
Ft

in2

Fb = F t

lbf
F b =21600*1
in

lbf
F =21600.7
in

F br

.6*F

F br = 32400

.9*FY

.-inlbf

Stress calculations for the pin

P

The 1.25 is a 25 percent increase in the load to insure that the lifting
beam will pass the 125 percent of rated load load test.

6000.lbf. 1.25

1 = 3-in
a

d = 1.541

lbf
w = 3000 07

'6

25in

In

n.d2

A , =T

=-

S =0.331 *in3

xed3

32

a*b
- 4 2 . a + b)
2.1

M =V-aif

--

V-Ac

fb

I -

V
2.w

b is the area the force is distributed over. a and c are the

distance on either side of the distributed force.

c =a

.25.in

= 1.767 .in

V = 3750 -1bf

The distributed force.

Cross-sectional area of pin.
Section modulus of pin.
Maximum shear load on pin.

M = 3281.25 -1bf.in

Maximum moment on pin

Ibf
f v =2122.066*3
in

The pin will support the shear loading. OK

Ibf
f b = 9902.974 *in2

The pin will support the bending load.

Check interaction of the two stresses.

fb

fv

Fb

Fv

-i- = 0.557

Since the resultant is less than or equal to 1, a I.375in. diameter pin is

adequate. OK

5.0 VERTICAL BAR STRESS CALCULATIONS

A-3

Date:

Checker:

WHC-SD-WM-DA-179 Rev. 0

Determine the stresses in the bar given that each bar must support 6000 Ibf. Refer to drawing H-2-83761.
5.1 LUGSHEAR TEAR OUT
I

d = 1.5625.b
A,

f;=

d
R +offset - 2 aw.2
P

w = 2.5.h
A

= 1.5.h

, 6.094 -in2
=

lbf

AC

f = 1230.769*T

Since the actual shear stress is less than

allowable, the lug is adequate to resist shear
tearout. OK

A br = 1.953 *in2

Area under bearing stress.

in

5.2 BEARING F A I L U a
Abr

=W-

P
fbr = *br

offset '= .5*h

lbf

f br = 3 8 4 0 . 7

Since actual bearing is less than the allowable

bearing, the bar will adequately support the load.
OK

in

5.3 TENSION FAILURE

This section of calculations determines the remaining stressable area . It then calculates the tensile
stress this area is under. Each side of the bar has a small but significant section of area removed.

a
I
\

y=1.125

y= ( x - 2

+ 225)-.5

a : =1.5411

b := .25.in

c := 2.J2.b.R - b2

c = 1.658-in

1.125.in dx

- =0.829*h

Integral defining the area between the two curves.

Checker:

Date:
2
A = 0.743 9
h

Area due to one removed section (see the sketch above).

A h =daw

A h =3.906*h2

At

x.R2 - 2.A, - A h

A t = 1.676-in

Ibf

f t .= A
t

ft =4475.604*3
in

WHC-SD-WM-DA-179 Rev. 0

Cross-sectionalarea of the hole.

Total tensile area.
The actual tensile stress is less than allowable the
bar will adequately support the tensile load. OK

5.4 TENSION FAILUREAT TOP OF BAR THREADS

Threads must be added to the vertical bar inorder to attach a lifting hook. The reduction in
cross-section area will cause an increase in stress. Determinethis stress.
x
2
A thread .= -.(2.26.in)
4

A bar

= 4*(3-in)

A t =Abar-Athread

Athred =4.011*in2

Cross-sectionalarea removed due to the

lifting hook threads.

A bar = 7.069 .in

Total cross-sectional area of the 3 in.

diameter bar.

= 3.057*in2

f t := A
t
5.5 THREAD STRESS CALCULATIONS

Threads matching the hook design from drawing H-2-99569 Rev. 4 are used on the vertical
bar, therefore, the threads on the vertical bar are adequate.
6.0 LIFTING HOOK CALCULATIONS

The 15 ton lifting hook design was obtained from a Westinghouse Hanford drawing (H-2-99569).
Therefore, the hook is adequate for use in this design.
7.0 WELD CALCULATIONS

The welds connecting the top lug and bottom lugs to the I-beam are a prequalified complete penetration
welds per AISC 1992, page 4-164. OK.

A-5

Date:

Checker:

WHC-SD-WM-DA-179 Rev. 0

8.0 DETERMINE THE ADEQUACY OF THE LUGS

Determine if the lifting lug shown below is adequate to support the 12,000 Ib load of the 241AZ01A decant pump. The
analysis must conform to the Hanfoid Hoisting and Rigging Manual (a factor of safety of 3 must be used). The AlSC
Manual of Steel Construction was used to determine the allowables for such things as bearing stress. The plate is 112''
thick and the pin is 2" bar. For further information reference drawing H-2-820775.

2 PLACES

8"

-1

3"

Allowable Stress Calculations for A36 CS

Fy
Ft

lbf
36000*>
in

FY
=
T

Yield stress for A36 CS.

lbf
F t = 12000 '2

in

lbf
F t = 12000 *-

in*

F b = 12000
F " . = 3F Y

.-lbf
in2

F v = 12000.-

Ibf

in2

AlSC Manual of Steel Constructions

A-6

WHC-SD-WM-DA-I79 Rev. 0

Date:

Checker:
8.1 SHEAR TFAROUT

Determine if the lifting .-1g will fail due to shear tearoi as shown in th- ketch below. Since there are two lugs
assume that one lug can carry 2/3of p e load to be conservative.
-

P = 12000.lbf

p lug

P lug = 9000 *lbf

2
-

Each lug is constructed of two plates, assume that one plate can carry 213 of the lug load

lug
2

P plate '= 7

P plate

-1

= 6750 .Ibf

A , = 2-l.h

A , =2*in2

i h e minimum area in stiear.

P plate
-v - A,

lbf
f " = 3375 *in'

This calculation shows that shear tearout is not a

factor in this design. OK

8.2 BEARING FAILURE

Determine the bearing stress on the 2 1/16 diameter hole.
t =

0.5-in

A br

Plate thickness.

2.0625411-t

P plate

fbr = %

Projected area of hole in bearing.

The actual bearing stress is less than the allowable bearing stress. OK

A-7

Checker:

Date:

WHC-SD-WM-DA-179 Rev. 0

8.3 TENSION FAILURF

Given the tension failure shown below and the sketch on the previous page, determine the tension stress.

A t := 2.l.in.t
A = 1 *in2

lbf
ft=6750*7

in

Area under tensile loading.

The actual tensile loading is less

than the allowable. OK

k
Given the 2 diameter pin shown in the sketch on page A-1, determine if it is adequate to support the load on the lug.
1 =3*in

A,

"

fb

?tad2

=T

=-

A,

:=

d = 2.in

Obtainedfrom the sketch on page A-I and the drawing H-2-820775.

A ,=3.142-in

Cross-sectionalarea of the pin.

S = 0.785 *in3

Section modulus of the pin.

V =4500 -1bf

Maximum shear load on the pin.

M = 6750 -in.lbf

Maximum moment on the pin.

= 1432.394

- inIbf

The actual shear load is less than the allowable. OK

f b = 8594.367

.-Ibf
in2

The actual moment is less than the allowable. OK

f,

A-a

Checker:

Date:

WHC-SD-WM-DA-179 Rev. 0

Check interaction of the shear and moment stresses.

fb

fv

Fb

Fv

- + - = 0.836

Since the interaction.ofthe two stresses is less than or equal to 1the pin is adequate per
AISC. OK

10.0 V E LD CALCULATIONS
10.1 1/8 PIN WELD

Due to the configuration of the lug the only possible load the welds between the pin and the plate may see is a
tensile load. This could only hamen if the hook were to slip to one end of the pin wrapping around the plate and
pulling on the pin. The weid is a 1/8 fillet weld.
A,

:=

x-d

,= 6.283 *in

= 1432.394.-

lbf
in

Ibf
f a := 3 6 0 0 0 . 3
in

Linear area
of the weld.

Linear force on
weld.
Allowable
force on weld.

fr

W'=.707.fa
w

= 0.056 .in

w,

FS

=-

.125-in
,a

,r

Requiredweld
size.

FS =2.221

The actual weld size is less than the

required weld size. OK

A-9

Date:

Checker:

WHC-SD-WM-DA-I79 Rev. 0

10.2 3/16" LUG AlTACHMENT WELD

Determine the stress in the rectangularweld shown below if it is treated as a line.

5in

Thickness of plate.

A w = 17-in

Linear area of the weld.

Ibf
f =529.412*in

Linear force on weld.

Ibf
f a = 36000.3
in

Allowable force on weld.

w a := .18754n

:=

r
.707*fa
f

w = 0.021 .in

Required weld size.

size.

w a = 0.187 in

The actual weld size.

FS =9.014

The actual weld size is less than the required weld

size. OK

A-I 0

WHC-SD-WM- DA- 179

Rev. 0

Appendix B
von Mises stress p l o t s o f the l i f t i n g beam
components: Top L i f t i n g Lug, I-Beam and Gusset Plate,
and Lower L i f t i n g Lug

B-1

,In STRESS Lc=l

V o n Mises

5 78E+83
P
N

COSMOS/M
Version :V 1.70
TQP-LUG02
11-16-94

--cc

s
0

Iy

(L

m
C

.L.

WH C- SD-W M -bA179

cn
I-

n
It