Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
1 3 0 ( 2 0 0 6 ) 4 8 1 4 9 4
available at www.sciencedirect.com
Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EA, United Kingdom
Instituto de Silvicultura, Universidad Austral de Chile, Casilla 567, Valdivia, Chile
c
Departamento de Geografa, Universidad de Alcala, C/Colegios, 2, 28801 Alcala de Henares, Spain
d
Departamento de Ecologa, Edificio de Ciencias, Universidad de Alcala, 28871 Alcala de Henares, Spain
e
School of Conservation Sciences, Bournemouth University, Talbot Campus, Poole, Dorset BH12 5BB, United Kingdom
b
A R T I C L E I N F O
A B S T R A C T
Article history:
The temperate forests of Chile are classified a biological hotspot as a result of their high
species diversity and high endemism. However, they are being rapidly destroyed, with sig-
nificant negative impacts on biodiversity. Three land-cover maps were derived from satel-
30 December 2005
lite imagery acquired over 25 years (1975, 1990 and 2000), and were used to assess the
Chile. Between 1975 and 2000, there was a reduction in natural forest area of 67% in the
study area, which is equivalent to an annual forest loss rate of 4.5% per year using a com-
Keywords:
Chile
patch size, which was associated with a rapid increase in the density of small patches
Forest fragmentation
(<100 ha), and a decrease in area of interior forest and in connectivity among patches. Since
Deforestation
the 1970s, native forest loss was largely caused by an expansion of commercial plantations,
Landscape indices
which was associated with substantial changes in the spatial configuration of the native
Nothofagus
forests. By 2000, most native forest fragments were surrounded by highly connected exo-
Temperate forests
tic-species plantations. The assessment of forest loss and fragmentation provides a basis
for future research on the impacts of forest fragmentation on the different component of
biodiversity. Conservation strategies and land use planning of the study area should consider the spatial configuration pattern of native forest fragments and how this pattern
changes over time and space at landscape level.
2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1.
Introduction
1995; Noss, 2001). These two processes may have negative effects on biodiversity, by increasing isolation of habitats
(Debinski and Holt, 2000), endangering species, and modifying species population dynamics (Watson et al., 2004). Fragmentation may also have negative effects on species
482
B I O L O G I C A L C O N S E RVAT I O N
1 3 0 ( 2 0 0 6 ) 4 8 1 4 9 4
2.
Study area
B I O L O G I C A L C O N S E RVAT I O N
3.
Methods
3.1.
3.2.
It was necessary to correct the images geometrically, atmospherically and topographically before they could be used to
assess changes in forest cover and fragmentation (Chuvieco,
1996; Rey-Benayas and Pope, 1995). Geometric correction
was performed using the full processing module in PCI Geomatics. This consisted of a transformation of each image
using both GCPs (ground control points) and a 2nd order polynomial mathematical model. ETM+ images were spatially corrected in order to use them as a basis to correct the MSS and
TM images. The satellite images were georeferenced separately to vector maps by locating approximately 5565 corresponding GCPs in each image and the reference map. Road
1 3 0 ( 2 0 0 6 ) 4 8 1 4 9 4
483
3.3.
Image classification
484
3.4.
B I O L O G I C A L C O N S E RVAT I O N
3.5.
Maps were analysed using ARC VIEW (version 3.2; ESRI (1999))
and its extension Arc View Spatial Analyst 2.0 for Windows to
quantify land cover change and forest loss and to configure
grid covers for the application of landscape spatial indices.
These indices (or spatial metrics) were computed by FRAGSTATS (version 3) (Mcgarigal et al., 2002) to compare the spatial pattern of forest cover for each time interval and study
area. The native forest category was used to conduct the analysis of deforestation and fragmentation of native forests. In
this study, the compound-interest-rate formula was used
due to its explicit biological meaning (Puyravaud, 2003):
100
A2
ln
t2 t1
A1
where A1 and A2 are the forest cover at time t1 and t2, respectively. P is percentage per year.
Quantification and comparison of the spatial configuration
of native forest fragments was conducted based on the following set of key landscape metrics selected after reviewing
recent forest fragmentation studies (Armenteras et al., 2003;
Franklin, 2001; Fitzsimmons, 2003; Imbernon and Branthomme, 2001; Millington et al., 2003; Staus et al., 2002; Steininger et al., 2001): (a) patch area (ha), (b) patch density
(number of patches per 100 ha), (c) largest patch index (% of
the landscape comprised by the largest patch), (d) total edge
length (km), (e) total core area (total patch size remaining
after removing a specific buffer edge) (ha), (f) mean proximity
index (ratio between the size and proximity of all patches
whose edges are within a specified search radius of the focal
patch [250 m, 1 km and 2 km]), (g) radius of gyration (average
P
1 3 0 ( 2 0 0 6 ) 4 8 1 4 9 4
4.
Results
4.1.
Accuracy assessment
4.2.
Table 1 Area of land cover types in 1975, 1990, and 2000 in Rio Maule-Cobquecura
Cover type
1975
1990
2000
(ha)
(%)
(ha)
(%)
(ha)
(%)
105,701
193,532
112,818
119,994
29,579
16,541
18
34
19
21
5
3
78,482
260,607
79,643
56,133
96,777
6522
14
45
14
10
16
1
124,819
104,151
93,261
39,002
211,686
4800
22
18
16
7
36
1
Total
578,164
100.0
578,164
100.0
578,164
100.0
B I O L O G I C A L C O N S E RVAT I O N
1 3 0 ( 2 0 0 6 ) 4 8 1 4 9 4
485
Fig. 2 Temporal and spatial variation of the major land cover types in Rio Maule-Cobquecura for the years: (a) 1975, (b) 1990,
and (c) 2000.
across the landscape (Fig. 2). Conversely, exotic-species plantations increased from 5% land area in 1975 to 17% in 1990; by
2000 this land cover type was the dominant cover on the map,
comprising 36.6% of total land area. In 1975 exotic-species
plantations were located principally in three specific areas
within the study area. By 2000, the plantations had rapidly expanded across the landscape, reaching sites at different altitudes and aspects. Shrublands and arboreus shrublands
were the dominating vegetation formations in the cover maps
of 1975 (33%) and 1990 (58%). Ten years later, these formations
decreased to represent 34% of total area, and the exotic-species plantation became the dominant land cover type at that
time. During the first time interval, 36% of the native forest
area was converted to shrubland and arboreus shrublands,
29% to exotic-species plantations, and 31% remained as native forest. During the second time interval, a substantial area
(50%) of native forest was replaced by exotic-species plantations whereas only 7% was converted by logging to shrublands and arboreus shrublands and 36% remained as native
forest. More than half (53%) of the native forest cover existing
in 1975 has gradually been converted into exotic-species plantations by 2000; another substantial area (40%) was transformed into shrublands or arboreus shrublands. From 1975
to 2000, agricultural and pasture lands exhibited a slight increase (Table 1). However, in 1990 the area occupied by this
cover type declined to 14% as a consequence of the conversion of land cover types (including pasture lands) to exoticspecies industrial plantations after the promulgation of the
law on forestation in 1976. Conversely, shrubland presented
an increase from 1976 to 1990 due to the clearance of secondary forests. In 2000, most of this shrubland appeared to be
covered by exotic-species plantations. By overlapping the forest native cover of each year, it was observed that between
4.3.
One of the basic symptoms of forest fragmentation is the increase in number of smaller patches (Fig. 3). In the Rio
Maule-Cobquecura considerable changes were found in the
distribution of forest patch size between time intervals
(Fig. 3). By 1975, 44% of the forest area was concentrated in a
large patch between 20,000 and 100,000 ha; the remaining forest area occurred in isolated patches of less than 10,000 ha,
with almost half occurring in very small patches of less than
100 ha. In 1990, 59% of the total area of native forests occurred
in patches of less than 100 ha. By 2000, this percentage increased to 69% and only 3% had a size greater than 1000 ha.
4.4.
486
B I O L O G I C A L C O N S E RVAT I O N
1975
60,000
50,000
40,000
30,000
20,000
10,000
0-100
100-500 500-1000
10002000
20005000
500010000
1000020000
20000100000
1990
60,000
50,000
40,000
30,000
20,000
10,000
0-100
100-500
500-1000
10002000
20005000
500010000
1000020000
20000100000
2000
60,000
50,000
40,000
30,000
20,000
10,000
0-100
100-500 500-1000
10002000
20005000
500010000
1000020000
20000100000
1 3 0 ( 2 0 0 6 ) 4 8 1 4 9 4
Table 2 Changes in landscape pattern indices for the native forests in Rio Maule-Cobquecura in 1975, 1990, and 2000
Landscape indices
Patch density (n/100 ha)
Largest patch index (%)
Total edge length (km)
Total core area (ha)
100 m
300 m
500 m
Mean proximity
Radius of Gyration (m)
1975
1990
2000
0.93
6.91
20,330
1.65
1.30
22,337
1.36
0.16
15,799
21,138
666
27
5880 18,585
6630 220
918
0
0
612 3263
1619 107
839
0
0
73 294
542 93
B I O L O G I C A L C O N S E RVAT I O N
4.5.
Spatial relations between native forest cover and
other land cover types
In 1975 the major land cover types exhibited a high frequency
of like adjacency between pixels of the same cover type (index
of aggregation greater than 80%) (Fig. 4a). By 1990 shrubland
was the cover type most aggregated in the landscape (86%),
followed by agricultural land (70%), exotic-species plantation
(63.4%) and native forest (62.7%). In 2000 the level of aggregation of shrubland decreased to 80%, while exotic-species
plantation and agricultural land increased to 79% and 72%,
respectively. Conversely, native forest decreased to 59%, the
lowest level of aggregation in the landscape. In 1975 the index
of aggregation revealed that the few large plantations were
highly aggregated, supported by a visual inspection of the
land cover map (Fig. 2). Then, by 1990 new areas of plantation
were sparsely established in the landscape, decreasing the
frequency of like adjacency. However, by 2000 the rapid
expansion of plantations across the landscape led to a more
aggregated and compact cover (Fig. 4a).
Native forest fragments were gradually becoming increasingly adjacent to different types of patches between 1975 and
1990. This is confirmed by the Adjacency index, which shows
that in 1975 most of the native forests were mainly adjacent
to shrublands, and less to exotic-species plantation and agricultural land. From 1990 to 2000 this situation changed substantially as a result of the expansion of exotic-species
plantations, resulting in an increase in the adjacency between
100
(a)
90
80
70
60
50
1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
2005
year
(b)
800
600
400
200
1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
2005
year
1 3 0 ( 2 0 0 6 ) 4 8 1 4 9 4
487
this cover type and native forest fragments (Fig. 4b). During
the first time interval, the native forests were mainly surrounded by well-aggregated, interspersed patches of shrublands. Then, by 2000, most of the edges of the native forest
fragments were surrounded by well-aggregated patches of
exotic-species plantations (Fig. 4b).
5.
Discussion
5.1.
488
5.2.
B I O L O G I C A L C O N S E RVAT I O N
1 3 0 ( 2 0 0 6 ) 4 8 1 4 9 4
been used at different measurement times in the studies mentioned above, which might have had an effect on the estimation of forest loss. The present study, in contrast, used a
consistent type of data over a longer period.
An important increase in the area of shrublands was detected by 1990 as a result of the elimination of native forests
and arboreus shrublands during 19751990. Agricultural and
pastureland lands also expanded slightly by 2000 with the
reduction of native forests and shrublands in flat areas situated under 200 m elevation.
5.3.
Landscape pattern indices provide a useful tool to explore insite variability, cross-site differences and changes over time.
The simultaneous use of class-level and patch-level landscape
pattern indices enabled assessment of the spatial configuration
of forest cover and its relation to principal land cover types.
Conversely, Cumming and Vernier (2002) related only indices
at class level to non-spatial metrics to simulate regional effects
of forest management. Reed et al. (1996), in contrast, used only
indices at landscape level to analyse forest fragmentation in
south-eastern Wyoming, USA between 1950 and 1993.
Patch density and total edge length varied unpredictably
with deforestation in Rio Maule-Cobquecura. These metrics
increased in the earliest stage of forest loss and fragmentation and decreased during the later stages of deforestation.
Zipperer et al. (1990) also observed that the constant action
of deforestation led to a decline in patch density in central
New York, USA. In the study area, this process even eliminated forest patches created in the first study period. Similarly to Ranta et al. (1998), the substantial increase of patch
density in Rio Maule-Cobquecura was related to the concentration of the forest area in patches less than 100 ha in area.
In our study, patch size declined consistently over time,
which differs substantially to the situation recorded in Wisconsin (Pan et al., 1999). Armenteras et al. (2003) stated that
progressive reduction in the size of forest habitats is a key
component of ecosystem fragmentation.
The greatest absolute decline in the largest forest patch
size coincided with the time period where the greatest absolute decline in annual forest loss was observed, as registered
elsewhere (Fitzsimmons, 2003). This decline of large forest
fragments might have a significant effect on the response of
some species in the study area. For instance, the largest cloud
forest fragments were the most important characteristic
influencing the response of bird species in eastern Mexico
(Martnez-Morales, 2005). Similarly, higher bird species richness of resident and migrant species occurred in larger forest
fragments in Singapore Island (Castelletta et al., 2005).
Edge length exhibited different trends over time. For a similar period analysed, Fuller (2001) found that many of forest of
the watersheds studied in Virginia, USA also exhibited most
significant changes during 19871999. The edge length increased during the first time period of Rio Maule-Cobquecura,
indicating that forest cover on average became more geometrically complex over time. Similarly, Fitzsimmons (2003)
found for the perimeter-to-area ratio, a related index to shape
index, inconsistent behaviour with deforestation between
temporal and spatial comparisons. He suggested that this in-
B I O L O G I C A L C O N S E RVAT I O N
1 3 0 ( 2 0 0 6 ) 4 8 1 4 9 4
489
5.4.
Conservation implications
The progressive fragmentation might have significant ecological implications for species dependent on high-quality habitats situated in the interior regions of forest patches. For
example, in the lowland Amazonia rain forest the experimental forest fragmentation has resulted in significantly different
colonization rates between continuous and fragmented forests (Bruna et al., 2005). In the Atlantic forest landscape, abundance and a diversity of small mammals were lower in small
and medium-sized fragments than in large fragments and
490
B I O L O G I C A L C O N S E RVAT I O N
1 3 0 ( 2 0 0 6 ) 4 8 1 4 9 4
biodiversity (Gigord et al., 1999; Jeanneret et al., 2003). These impacts might be monitored on a large scale and over long periods
of time using land cover data (Luque, 2000; Honnay et al., 2002).
Similarly, urgent long-term conservation actions are
needed in this type of landscape that continue to be intensely
used for commercial purposes and where the lack of effective
conservation planning has inadequately exposed an area of
high diversity and endemism to extreme rates of forest loss
and fragmentation. Conservation strategies that encourage
the implementation of land use planning in a productive matrix have been proposed as a priority for the conservation of
the biodiversity in this type of landscape (Armesto et al.,
1998). Additionally, some researchers have emphasised that
conservation and land use management strategies should always consider the quality of the whole landscape and especially the number of different habitats and their spatial
arrangement (Steiner and Kohler, 2003).
6.
Conclusion
Acknowledgement
This research was made possible by funding from BIOCORES
(Biodiversity conservation, restoration, and sustainable use
in fragmented forest landscapes) project ICA-CT-2001-10095;
Bursary for young researchers from developing countriesEuropean Union (administered by UFZ, Germany); the UNEPWCMC Chevening Scholarship in Biodiversity; and the
FORECOS Scientific Nucleus P01-057-F (MIDEPLAN). The manuscript was improved by comments from three anonymous
reviewers.
We are grateful to Mark Ernste from UNEP GRID - Sioux Falls
and the UNEP-World Conservation Monitoring Centre for the
B I O L O G I C A L C O N S E RVAT I O N
Appendix 1.
491
1 3 0 ( 2 0 0 6 ) 4 8 1 4 9 4
Confusion matrices
Reference data
User
Error
accuracy
(%)
commission
(%)
Plantation Shrubland Arboreus Arable Water Native Total
shrubland land
forest
Classified
data
25
0
0
1
0
10
36
69.4
30.6
0
30
0
1
0
13
44
68.2
31.8
0
0
31
0
0
19
50
62.0
38.0
0
3
0
30
1
0
34
88.2
11.8
0
0
0
2
19
0
21
90.5
9.5
5
4
4
1
0
170
184
92.4
7.6
30
37
35
35
20
212
369
83.3
81.1
88.6
85.7
95.0
80.2
0.2
18.9
11.4
14.3
5.0
19.8
0
38
0
1
0
5
44
86.4
13.6
3
2
44
0
0
10
59
74.6
25.4
1
2
0
19
1
0
23
82.6
17.4
0
0
0
0
21
0
21
100.0
0.0
5
10
11
0
0
150
176
85.2
14.8
37
52
55
20
22
172
358
75.7
73.1
80.0
95.0
95.5
87.2
0.2
26.9
20.0
5.0
4.5
12.8
28
0
0
0
0
7
35
80.0
20.0
Reference data
Users
Error
accuracy commisPlantation Shrubland Arboreus Arable Water Native Bare
Recent Total
sion(%)
shrubland land
forest ground harvest
25
0
3
0
26
2
0
4
21
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
2
1
25
34
30
100.0
76.5
70.0
30
37
81.1
18.9
0
1
0
1
32
78.1
0
0
0
0
31
83.9
0
2
0
0
28
75.0
0
0
0
0
32
93.8
25
0
2
0
27
92.6
0
51
0
1
55
92.7
1
0
5
0
7
71.4
0
2
0
9
14
64.3
26
56
7
11
226
96.2
91.1
71.4
81.8
3.8
8.9
21.9
16.1
25.0
6.3
7.4
7.3
28.6
35.7
Overall classification
accuracy: 84.9%
* Recent harvest of commercial plantations (mainly Pinus radiata).
23.5
30.0
28.6
18.2
492
B I O L O G I C A L C O N S E RVAT I O N
R E F E R E N C E S
1 3 0 ( 2 0 0 6 ) 4 8 1 4 9 4
B I O L O G I C A L C O N S E RVAT I O N
1 3 0 ( 2 0 0 6 ) 4 8 1 4 9 4
493
494
B I O L O G I C A L C O N S E RVAT I O N
1 3 0 ( 2 0 0 6 ) 4 8 1 4 9 4