Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
S/PV.2718
28 October
1986
ENGLISH
Mr. AL SHMLI
(United
Australia
Bulgaria
Chik
Congo
Mr.
Mr.
TSVBTKOV
GAYAUA
ur. PIBRRXNG
Mr. de RWDULRRIA
Hr. GPBNO
Gh8M
Mr.
Hr.
wt.
Madaga8car
Thailand
and Tobago
02 Swiet
Kingdom
Northrrn
fmialimt
Of Great
Ireland
United Stater
Voneruela
This record
UooIEOlT
Mr.
Franc0
interpretation8
in the Official
Esirates)
Mr. LI Luyr
atmark
Trinidad
Union
UnitUd
Arab
of Amrica
Mr. BBLCN-
Republic8
Britain
RAQFTAFlRA
KAspusRT
ALramE
and
Sir John T8OMSON
nr. WALTERS
nr. AGUILAR
cantains
thu original
tgxt of apeaches delivered
in English
and
The final
text will be printed
of apeechea in the other
languages.
Recorda of t&t Seczurity zCouncil.
Corrections
should be subnritted
to original
speeches only.
They should be
sent under the aignatute
of a member of the delegation
concerned,
within
one week,
to the Chief,
Offfcial
Records PAiting
Section,
Department
of Conference
SB)rviCea,
rgom DC2-fS0, 2 United Nations Plaza , and incorporateA
in a copy of the recofd.
86-60937/A
2397V
(E)
S/PV.2718
AP/dW
2-5
The meeting
ADOPTSON
wa8 called
at 4.30 p.m.
to otd8r
OF "ME XENM
from
taken
of Nicaragua
AlgaLiar
the previous
at
to take
Argentina,
R8xico,
PBrU, Spain,
re8erVcd
for
at
Y8m8nr
Delaocratfc
the Syrian
the Council
table)
Mr.
Djoudi
(Iraq),
Mr. Martinez
of
Iraqr
Chamber-
(Algeria),
(Mexico),
the representatives
and Yugoalavia
Gadea
(Democratic
(Nicaragua)
took
Mr. Alzamora
Delpech (Arg8ntina)r
Mr.
OrdoRet (Ronduraa),
the
the representative
Honduras, India,
Mrs. Aetorga
I invite
GUat8lrah,
Arab Republic
the President,
of
item o I invite
table,
At the invitation
plac8
m8etinqe on this
In accordance with
Arabic):
(Peru),
Diaz
Duran
Mr- Kittani
nr.
reeerved
side of
the Council
from
Republic
di8cusSion
of
practice,
of Iran
I propofle,
with
the consent of
of the
a letter
without
and
Chartar
the
rule
13
37 of
to participate
with
aCCOrdanC8
to
fXUnCi1,
the right
to inform
to be invitad
agenda.
Council8
I should like
Arabic):
he requests
in which
in the discueeion
provisions
relevant
I have received
item on the
tha
to participate
that
Chamber.
invite
to vote,
that
of the
in the
th8 usual
represantative
in accordance with
th8 Council'8
provisional
the
ruleEJ
of proosdure.
Th8rt
-At
Iran)
the
took
being
no objection,
invitation
the
place
it
ie
80 decided.
of the Peeeident,
reserved
for
him
at
Mr. Rajaie-Khoraaeani
the
eide
of
the
Oxincill
(Islsmic
Republic
Chamber.
of
JP/#
S/PV. 2718
6
The PF!EsXomT:
the item
on its
at
speaker
is
Council
the
table
express my corntrys
Weetion,
my delegaticn
in this
activities
and other
ccncerno of all
iamsdiate
the
and
I wish first,
its
necessary
full
recently,
aspects of
the Council
faums
suppat
this
the serious
rmt
lo set
is nw
bearing
on
of Ststes
to renomc8
the pinciplee
familiar.
for
Sir,
to
princi@
organ
situation
its
in
position
cm the
the Cmtadara
legal
of the intamatimal
of
Groups
the uee of
eha gwn*rPtm*g
and coexiatenos
or&s
ccmmmity
to a mtter
that
it
cimpliance
Me fundamnbl
end
them.
force
Court of Justice
henceforth
and
law,
for
wab 08tablished.
of the Intatnational
nf ec?!: ~~c&y
*-
between States.
is Spain93 vfev
responsibility
It
wishes to refer
the international
the rntanatiaral
of intarnatimal
for
rcrspect
ead
my delegation
importance.
greatest
the metiers
relatimn
him to take
is being done.
some very
other
deemd it
cir~mstanaaa,
to be of
the Charter
becm
of
considers
Charter
including
with whi&
On the wesat
With
amsidaration
I invite
from Spanish)%
occasions,
a poeition
stressed
its
America,
of Spain.
(interwetation
satisfaction
Uaen a, previous
Central
new resume
and to congratulate
of the ulited
will
the represmtative
Pmeedings
Council
agenda.
The first
place
The Security
the ;rraLntenauce of
Chartar
to base their
the better
Scrupulous
$2ridlccl
fn the present
of the Wited
LntmtnstimaL
Mtions
reletione
application
Court of Justi-
=pP*t
is the cozmilment
respect
On
of whidr
for
the
have accordingly
syzts,
be
34
its
are at
s/W.2718
7
JP/8W
(Mr. Wren,
otaJce.
It
ie precisely
out iU
obligationr
&riving
ad&em
thecouncil
tabby,
Clwrfy,
thb
umpItence
the
fry
the Charter
that
the
mnclueicne
the watta,
rightly,
in the COkUt'S
theCourt%
the
&cbim
enter
timCourt
ccmcietena,
pamoeful
judgelwntoonstttutu
is
upcn
binding
whether
ordu,
order
in et iseue.
eince
& Ccntadtxa,
Yi%
trtQtmticma1
judgeraent
?!hi&
**(n
v--e.-
&a
rcepsct
with
h---
thegrtitest
effiactm
-nv
----~
link*-__
accepted
all
5r
Ccmpliana
tiich
haa eettled
forth
36, paragraph
6, of
in the disputer
a regiar
~.
ahagld
_
by the
it
that
known
it
the international
rentmciation
is well
ppincipl~
human ri#~te
ieof
the
the arguminteset
involved
for
rwpot
i-elf
Article
and non-intervention
In the @reSmtcase,it
5nitlatad
of
non-interference
of tee judicats.
by
parties
It
now.
calling
on
The Court
under
both
my delegation
disquisitione
ta hear
that
to caery
jut isdiction.
a~ unqumtionable
ti4a judgment
firet
ithm
a9 the matter
full
to the Sfatuts,
5ra
fn mind
the Chertu
of
legal
in the light
view,
ability
in the paeta
jur iodiction.
and bearing
to deal&
not duel1
into
Justice
uxmtry'e
rrhi&
CORUUII~~~hm accepted
c-4-w>--.
to
Nstiona
bee proqpted
occaeiO0m
binding
about
inmy
Statute,
I ahall
full
to mainah
ae ~1 eiailu
not
witid
noed
of the IntematiaralCourtof
hypothettoal
iS for
is
that
Spain)
in the intanal
free&~
law imteked
States.
for
of form,
of all.
Rlrthumore,
aowrding
thase pinci~esbeus
the
iuporetive
of the ourrsnt
internatimal
wrtanae
intm&tetiOn
of
from
rmF&
of doubt6
we have all
the
legal
thatthepeace
procmm
by lcmg-etading
brnrfit
The
in the Couct'e
is 8 goliticel
beset
affairs
problemr
for
about
proclaimed.
27 18
8
s/W.
JP/SW
Spain
&fr
mYIIA
carqratulete
you
qu iding
the Council*s
eine belarq
(Catgo)
wry
cm th
Hr.
in Carrying
out
his
Mwhel*s
in the
not
together
to
defend
at seeing
Belarogw , damonstrated
and
comaan
you occupying
area
clearly
been
grateful
to him.
SlloV
in an air
flown
of national
&are.
hais 1-t
illuat~iously
fat
other
of
will
and
established.
in Maplto.
high calibre.
of
stature
Africa
muthem
proof,iaed
stca~giet
of
talent
of
snd definitively
of a laaadsr
of the Uoian
great
Saaora Rachel
to Presidsnt
Republic
Paopleo
and a political
fs that
Your umntcy
yet
ftmeral
four bsyhaabean
fn Preai&mt
death
E6rpPeamtativm
tribute
rrouznktgof
moth.
gratified
feel
at half-eaet
act
the Pereanmt
Kc. Alexander
President
qualitier
President,
Rspublica,
w to pay a wll-desarved
dioaeter
of this
I sincerely
poet.
Pxialiet
Before
sir,
Fire,
umy in Mich
French)
and courteous
We can therefore
Your predeodssor,
hi8 dtmth
catpatent
from
and iaels.
l fficiehcy
(interpretstioh
to the t&m-Aligmd
ypur impartant
8oviet
for
inteceata
froa Ar&ic)r
a lea&x
Far
human
sumee&d
independenca.
great
of rare
hfricans
Africa
his
the great
and the uald
sudr LC zMEccx
H-L--%
.--L.us.H.
-a- a*, y-u
LLIN ati
.I ba0, n-b-4
-v-m-.. cp r~~tr)npkm
SW.--- yul 42+ni81abdal Ni4saer.
CkUrisza i4mhel died at a time when the struggle
apartheid
of great
was reaching
asais~noe
but,
a decisive
turning
aa President
point,
against
Denis Saiaesou-Nguesso,
President
of the
s/w.
Y&?/SW
27 18
9-1x)
(Mr.
People 8 ~&public of
Unity,
said
in hix xbtemnt
mAfrica
Samaa
ccntinuen;
We view
grave concern
even
kruica
by thoee
the
victary
of a conflict
tin0
&twth,
tribute
O~IICO
Pstter.
Rmmlution~
530
caxan
exprexsed
by the
of African
this
for
the otgmiaation
not
(1983) and
Council
whi&
the
death of
cm my him ifa to
he eacrifioed
arad pmgressive
whoue com~uencea
1s
by
his life.
fs fMtaiILm
raeoponeible for
are
represented
the struggle
The xtruggle
Cantcal
wiW Qthrmination
Vith
Cmgo)
on this oaca8ian:
is organising
Ibdml...
Continue
of
Cayam,
*ho
var.
have
not
we ahall
yet been
first
562
fully
not go into
the
in that
develqment
weighed,
the dynamicx
has coiuahm-3
teetimony
in
to the
fhe
S/PV. 2718
11
Mr
fact
The
surprising
believe
that
in the light
that
Principle
has repeatedly
Nicaragua
of developments.
of the peaceful
the Security
council
have availed
the-elves
over
of disputes
mles
actions
camot
approve.
against
&titude
interested
that
Nicaragua
to surprise
of those that
are daily
regional
seixrity
free&m,
particularly
those of central
in history
this
merica
and the
America.
where aggression
of unconscionable
for
words8
of the
which involves
of Nicaragua.
and encouragement of
is the obstinacy
stepplng
up their
and
efforts
the
to fomot
of all
of
as self-defence
the
for
instead of isposing
of other
non-interfeeence
affairs
America.
on the peoples of
Foreign Affairs
Tuesday
misdeede
present%3 last
financing
US, furthermore,
defending
action
- in other
to
in Central
region
and the
by the Charter
in the facts
the an&ant
tension8
Obviously
still
ComissiM
that
those that
of dialogue
Court of Justice
we believe
What continues
instances
in the virtues
of
should not be
For that
calculating
is to the credit
It
or to the Internatiooal
of all
Congo)
Gayama,
force,
settlement
States
of other
co-operation
all
and violate
States,
this
kinds of attacks
the principle
of
to have brought
into
of
on
6/PV. 271g
12
(Hr.
oonfidence
without
probleae
of secondary
could provide
relationshipe
heretofore
partisans
of the International
body, as in this
intentions
Zhe public
provieion
very
The
with
ad
always
Court
cauaea
Nevertheless,
these
of Justice
to challenge
in reepect
perplexity
is,
incompatibilitYr
which can
the
of Managua.
security
will
circurpstancee
Court
debate.
particular
of Waljhington
mercenarfea,
perilous
lengthy
in the abstract.
competence of that
for
for
between States
do not arise
firm
anti-Sanbinist
material
underlying
iseues.
and their
Congo)
Gayama,
and to
only be indulged
an exercise
in at considerable
risk.
MY delegation
a negotiated
would like
to reiterate
in any possible
aotution
~%NIti
claipeB
that
both parties
ita
dispute
faith
that
to make contact
a peaceful
in the virtue8
may exist
to that
settlement
provided
be quite
sufficient
political
incoapreheneitm
its
results
end.
are lacking.
indicated
if
their
followed,
even for
and
cannot be
The
availability
we believe,
would
moraliste.
Furthermore,
because
to ensure satisfactory
which,
of dialague
it
between btin
the latter
neighbours,
that
which it apparently
aupetr--err
simplY
wiahea to treat
of
(Mr.
July
Lad
the douncil
judgearent handed
military
hope that
believe,
could easily
Pace
symbolic
International
by the
this
activitiee
in and against
of
Court of Justice
for
The next
Mr.
MRTINEZ
debate currently
Sir,
taking
Nicaragua.
if
only
to preserve
which,
we
the oeportunities
law and the full
of the
from Arabic)a
he addressed to me.
is the representative
Council
table
ORDO&
(Fbndurae)
of Honduras.
I invite
him
by the delegation
was requested
the
speaker on my list
on
agreement,
Court of Justice
fnternational
Of
Congo)
and paramilitary
for
down
Gayama,
from Spanish):
Council
The
of Nicaragua pursuant
to
Article
94 Of the
Charter
to consider
of
Justice
in
and
The
alaselY
linked
Niearagua*m.
in
It
in this
internatiwal
itself,
situation
to Nicaraguas
request will
reason that
that
debate
the
my -reign
fact
that,
will
activities
appreciate,
obtaining
any decision
inevitably
is for
community
and paraailitary
of the Council
unfortunately
Accordingly,
Ln a part.
Military
Court
W18415)
as the members
to the grave
of which mnduras
respnse
with
against
subject
non-compliance
the
taken
in Central
by the
has instructed
of the n+e&rs
b-; raising
this
in
crieis.
UB to take part
of the Council
matter
America,
Ccjluncfl
Ministry
is
for
and of the
diocueeionr
-m
8/PV.2718
14-15
(Wr.
the Smdinista
within
Co;rcrrnment
using this
propxgandiet
intent,
Intotnational
court
to the
OWI
pllrp.&.
WaS pUraued
detriment
4 4 . ? ie
of the
here,
*::,~xxr;mg
both countries
that
8nd occurred
upon itself
ends, with
praatige
judicial
organ
a clear
and dignity
is not an isolated
before
the Court,
within
were involved
Nicaraguan territory
wqm
awn political
allaged
of the
tribunal,
it8
Hondcrae)
of Justice.
That att-4
its
ximply
is
!.nctx Ocdonez ,
ECsrt
interr,*l.
popular
that
discontent
and honourable
irr activities
by that
incident.
Lofty
which in fact
t&opt&
counlryr
, as reflected
out by
r(giipo,
originated
in
NkarUgUtUIS
.
The
tramparent
brought
PrOpUgandiSt
in itr
before
purpose
activities
a Eatbar pursuant
dSpo#itd
NkaKaguan
6overnment
wea
the International
involving
my country,
CBurt
particularly
of Justice
notwithotanding
its
when ft
full
tc the prior
unaware that
the
involving
co@etely
of
roservatitm
msda
by my country
such
action.
cn 22 Hay 1986,
That reservation
was
by
s/w.
st?S/PLJ
2718
16
(Hr.
My Goverment
propagahdirrtic
apecific
further
caM Of Nicaragua,
It
Govarmnte
have escaped
and
whatever
attitude
one it
because it
in the
Government
for
represents
full
md traditionally
activities
Government io coamitted,
difference8
within
Which offer8
Srndinieta
international
are our
the Smdinista
of
of
to the Contadora
historically
the notice
peoplec of Central
pur~sea,
countrye
Honduras)
r4merice.
cannot
brotherly
Ordonea,
condemns thie
8turbling
in Central
it
Mattinee
&a are
all, Central
real prorpsctr
Governnent
that
is this
fact
which makas
American Governments,
dialogue
prccere
wtthin
In resorting
and, for
hopes
which
reprehensible,
more
the
cut of
by Governments
It
the
for a mttleaent.
is inqeding
support
all
pinned their
mason,
brothers.
Govarnment all
that
the
because that
to keep our
purely
bodies,
the
propagandistic
of the highest
Court
in the
world.
Referring
searion,
Hr.
to this
the Foreign
Cmr~os
-2
Minister
of Hondurm5,
however,
eliminate
racourae
mcckery of the
of th8 crisir
before
to the highest
Contadora
initiative
in Central
America.
HofiduraBr
the court,
preaont
etatedt
Cmtreras,
Wo must,
of the Republic
international
~harrgua'o
uith
jurisdictional
continued
organ,
make
for a political
eolctiou
.,.
in diplomatic
my Govarment
rinhea
to
has dtoignated
&seas
that
the
itr
true
agent
S/W.2718
17
BHS/PLJ
(Mr. Martine2
origin
of the
situation
political
develvnts
in Nicaragua
important
has attempted
Project
an image which
has to a considetable
does not
reflect
degree declared
for
itself
Ur. President,
table
Amy
with resWct
agalnst
from Arabic) t
to aake
people,
that
to
which
Government.
the Council
is
a mattet
L..
should put
the
reprwaentative
Council
I invite
him to tak&
his statement.
(interpretation
on the
from Spanish)8
question
aucmas in
delegation
of the crisis
for
in Central
countries
-..w
L thank
of Guatemala.
to begin my statement
to address the
links
by its
experienced
opportunity
u.Le**I.j
in order
addressed t0 M?D
end
I should like
your office.
p*uu*-
the
is using the
Government
rebellion
in
Fir.
which
by jeopardising
kind of activity.
America,
itself..
Court of Justice,
the facts
this
that
is complaining
an end to this
that
to the fact
Council
It
Honduras)
p. 371
Grdofiez,
in Central
America,
Guatemala is affected
mhdnnt
erely
s-.-w
--(a M
--~-
m-y--...
by any
shirk
in recent
our
responsibility
vicissitudes,
aware or our
aid
of
the
vital
wed
to
wark
taqethqr
S/PV.2718
18
SHS/PLJ
Wt. Andrade
Guatemala1
effectively
other
in all
fields.
of Central
nation8
tailors
Guatemala
accepted principles
this
For Guatemla
its
harmoniour
coexistence
solidarity
DUran,
and co-operation
with
thle
and standards
Spells out
our
Diaz
support
procedures
palicy
to the
fulfilment
of thi
generally
community.
ensuring
vhich
In
clearly
purposes of this
Organisation.
To facilitate
States
that
their
the fulfilnmnt
&t
not merely
political
united
will
The
resolved
situations
in Central
problem
in the light
are difficulties
with
clearly
they
it
is vital
demonstrate
the resolutions
and decisions
of
would be disorder
and anarchy
and
which resort
its
accompli solution,
would negate
the
rule
many ramificationta.
the auestion
and we consider
~~f~e++tfnr~;
force
to
partial
a final
We are well
solutions,
and
aware that
or attewts
of
there
to deal
solution.
agreements to veuolve
+r&
in
Guatemala calls
nonarnl4mA
a---- ------
the result
America
of all
of various
fait
also that
but
to caaply
we would be provoking
for
in good faith
and undertake
of the Charter,
provisicms
Nations orsane.
This must
law.
of the
and political
in a cozqteheneive
extremely
manner.
negotiations,
We reject
and
any
of a
and unforeseeable
results.
Guctema1.e
it
cormidsra
it3 still
that
CC)~%~Wr:il~ai:ian,
this
pursuing,
ia how it
as alunya,
a policy
of active
neutrality,
ta the cestotation
since
of Faces
s/W. 2719
19-20
BHS/PGJ
(Mr. Andrade
Guatemala)
American integration
Central
neutrality
of friction
side at the
enpenee
We maintain
or confrontation
of our
there
is no aueetian
we are totally
teneion
and to lasting
various
since we cannot
favour
of
in
any
one
understanding.
a passive
attitude
that
wordsa
In other
involving
inactivity;
far
lead to a lessening
could
of
peace.
office
a nmber of initiatives
problems of our
a Central
appropriate
the diucuaeion
forum for
position
at or facilitating
of maintaining
it,
aolutionr
Thiu position
may arise,
that
peoples.
Duran,
of the other.
which
of President
directed
sub-region.
of our
the
five
integriition
countriee.
Republic,
effective
outset
wC,ich cculd
to pro&mte the
of the
to finding
At
American Parliament,
developtnent
situation
from
and the
Diaz
the
proposal
act as the
to Central
and the
Aaerica,
political,
s/W.
2718
21
Andrade Dial Due&n,
Guatemala)
(Hr.
initiative
The
favourable
level
02 the derrcrcratic
ertabliahed
reqective
the Central
a comaisoion
Preaidenta
-r&can
Goverment
mituatlon
it
thet
continue
Preaidents
practically
four
creative
mediation
social
for
carried
strengthened
fields.
finding
by the work
proposal
that
thanks
again ito
borne
ttm proposals
t%srCumrPn
----v--w--
unconditional
concerned wer
fruit.
thay
of Heads of
will
Of the
mtudy
nature,
differences
which
~AHP~ALDP
--..---..eM
4,
--
support
that
their
kinds.
Goveruments to
recognition
Venezuela
for
of the
and PanaJw
tk
effortm
countries
which
spells
_--
good
davelaped
securPty,
the
Thio genuinely
M-..
out
ecofu~ic
and
creativity
Latin
a&
WS?Micah paace
of the intwnationa~
t.hQa
_.-o-
mrrra4nn
--_--
_---
Cn
--
of?icce.
Pm&dent
ia tacent
months
f-x
of Central
acknowhdge
aad recognition
for theae
the
in the political,
We must
rnvxrnmr4rba
-pF
-c-o
ha8
would
of various
of their
to Contadora
have made.
the support
the deadlock
de Ba@Juipulaaa
of a personal
of Objectives,
solutions
parmanent
Mglld-----a 4-u-
la Villa
of
was
objective
to recall
and
the political
guideline8
attitude
gathering
historic
work
May in
to the
year8.
i8 appropriate
in
and reconciling
reaffirad
nagotiationo
the
that
contacts
held
and to report
This positive
to have a forthright
possible
in
Goverments,
proposal
to study the
in Guatemala.
Goverrwnt
Sxternal
of Qmtrnl
r+.ommhrr4zo
-..=--.
- ----
Vinicio
Coreas,
in the mediation
Affairs,
togethet
Rmarica in order
to
with
s/w. 271s
22
NR/@d
Andrade
Guatemsla)
(Mr.
explore
tmrk
the possibiUtie8
could
continue
and Co--ration,
Peace
Gusts-elan
end.
ara currently
facilitating
to broad
understanding.
Aaerican
Goverrments
region.
maintain
k
that
We suet all
If
we
also
im
teapo&
for
we might
proclaim
rights
in the
non-fnterventioa
seYf-determination
emn future
when
of psoples,
tkq
at
a better
countries.
in
in order
8nd
we consider
without
prejudice
the
regions1
to
to
of the
It
principles
of other
that
our
of internal
population8
also
means
states
with
through
pluralism,
bscause,
of international
while
law, such
an8 the
the circumstances
peoples.
level,
for
thst
the proce8888
without
future
emuring
understanding
peace
interests
sides,
vhich,
that
meaaurem
legitimate
both
also recall
to ntdntsin
affairs
qria
govartuuonts.
ue must
to that
of the Central
be recalled
consultstisn
fundsmntsl
internal
rhould
sscrifices
an
OM of our
cud fun&mental
the
have
and consolidate
damxratic
foe
Those
results.
and authentic
rasp@&
it
reach
can
need
is more important
concession8
oncourage
and every
gusrantedng
humsn
we
will
which
it
to PcIke certain
to
soaors
representative
nation8
attitude.
remhe
that
prepared
in e&h
free elections
ss
and realistic
Act on
the political
circumstances,
reconciliation
all
YO need
WO are convinced
shmrbl
above all
bs prepared
our sovereignty,
fluid
the
ao that
the
Aswrican countries
l Itph88iae
to
through
our consideration.
for
again
and
any nsgotiations
successful
once
DUrsn,
and negotiations
agreement
Central
permansnt
Zn view of the
a flaxibls
preeented
visiting
In this
of consultation8
of achieving
officials
ores dialogue
the
of a resumption
D&as
limitations
mericans
require
of
their
any kind.
reBtOring
NR/+d
s/W.2718
23
(Hr. Andrade
Guatemala)
rnd in parallel
with
the mriouo
utmst
exi6tence
hamper
our
our(lelveB,
solution
preserving
&zting
factors
of
task.
TO ignore
but we
must
by
existence
sure
and
juotice
democracy,
invite
next
The
country,
tha duty
of
W delegations
of We work of
The
Wicsragu~
Council
ie
against
comply
in
of thie year.
with
Unite&
the
table
shall
We
be to deceive
deCiSiOn6
fashion
our
are
taken
future
by
to
thank
representative
the
the
Republic)
convey
to
my
work
undoubtedly
Syrian
Republic,
Arab
ohom I
you
(interpretation
from Arabic):
representative
the
congratulation6
eincereet
of the
Security
enable
you
on
Council
to
bring
of a fraternal
for
your
a66umptfon
this
month.
of the Council
work
the
I ehould like
for
akill
last
great
the
State8
awl
ito
the
complaint
reauest
of the International
juclgement
While it
he demon&rated
during
his
conduct
month.
today to consider
meetina
tho
of
Arab
over the
appreciation
Cour.zil
definitive
encouraging
representative
Emirates,
culmination.
country
June
wish
presiding
the
wuld
or indirectly
addre66ed to me-
(Syrian
desired
the
first
factors
f tom Arabic)
at the Council
YoUr skill
to
the
AL-ATASSI
President,
f4r.
ir
to take a place
Mr.
of
speaker
such
of the
amity.
The PRRSIDREPP
(interpretation
of Guatefmla
Airectly
vhich
Americano.
to do it6
origin
the final,
politic6
io prepared
again
America.
of
that
Central
the
peace, consolidating
with
Central
in
once
Duran_,
recurity,
negotiatiomt
Guatemala
of external
the
also be
and l xcl.usively
solely
of the
comsiderationrr.
6 peaceful
a eerier
of
a6pectr
Diaa
Is
true
that
todays
that
by
the
Court
complaint
the
of
Government
Gcvernmont
of
of
handed down
3ustice
haa
been
that
peeeented
NRhd
S/w.2718
24-25
(Mr. Al-Ataomi,
Rapubl ic)
by the
Gowmrmnt
really
confined
fact
this
by the
of Nicaragua
to the conflict
complaint
relates
Court
in the
out
the
to the obligation
statement
Council.
States,
this
international
i8 not
am3 Nicaragua.
on the part
judicial
coqlaint
Arab
In actual
of Me&es States
authority,
that
to abide
is,
the
of Justice.
Nicaragua
the United
of the highest
judgeDant
International
against
Syrian.
a&e
by the
That statement
abide by their
judgeraent of the
Court.
Hfnfrker
was cuite
responsibilities
for Foreign
clear.
In it
and that
Affairo
of
ha asked that
S/PV.27u3
26
N!?/at
(Hr. Al-Ataasi,
Arab Republic)
We should like
to otrees
territorial
integrity
prihciplee
contaiued
entitled
to select
United States
in their
in the
its
judgentent,
to live
supplying
the
foutdat ion.
ft
the actual
practice0
Administration
Council
and juetificatione
argumenta
The
held
=f -..4tia ~l!t!cal
decision
againat
immediately
fact
the
policy
Nicaragua
that
pretext
they
is
anA ConeewentlY
invoked by the
United
no one.
clear
States
Ite
constantly
diepleated
are
and demonstrate-a
will
with
to resist
or Government of Non-Aligned
of the International
eW3cfally
to disguise
of Nicaragua
interference.
Eighth
Countries,
States
the
is devoid of any
of force
of the
to
oneD
conduct an independent
which
any foreign
have
one
that
country
the threat
ie a false
to
of .international
The cl&a
thie
JUStiCe
given
is a legitimate
to that
to justify
of
The right
and is a thceat
by the
Court
support
is
interference,
ie simply a pretext
before
a8 the
all
any State
, euuh
aRd
of States,
Furthermore,
international
force.
sovereignty
affairs
internal
them with
of Nicaragua
ufse of
State
United States
the
system.
threatening
for
respmt
Nations Charter.
own eocio-economic
Nicaragua
acts
in
guaranteed
State6
united
as well
of
and non-interference
against
mercenaries,
principle8
the
Syrian
the findings
Nicaragua
to cease
their
court
of the Court
had violated
and
to
refrain
call
to tho
United
of Justice
that
the
ai1
States
delivered
euch
law and
a&e.
to comply with
the
on 27 June 19669
United statea,
international
from
in paragraphs
that
by its
it
amy
wan
ho~tilc
under
a duty
NS/at
8/w.
2718
27
(Mr. Al-Ataeei,
Arab Republic)
The declaration
Contadota
also
expressed
aimed at securing
Group
its
support
for
a negotiated
the diplomatic
solution
Syeian
effort8
to the crisie
of the
Central
in
America.
How many times have we heard the repremntativee
Security
Council,
of Central
express
desire
their
America without
to reach
any foreign
expressed their
States
part of the
which
readiness
lrnfortunately,
deoigned to frucrtrate
is
crisis
uorld?
in Central
efforts
America.
which constitute
solution
That policy
party
likewise
parties
restored
tense
possible
has persisted
that
The text
to resort
to the Security
judgement of the
deferrl
pdgement
The
for hffl
to the
a blow against
those
a
xy country
consider6
in Central
dialogue
60 that
important
of Article
International
that
the efforte
eteps leading
94 of the
Council
legality
down by the
PRFMDEHT:
Council
The Council
Internationa!
the
that
to assume their
and to con&train
I thank
Charter
can be
to an easing
fo clear.
Court of Justice.
member6 of the
international
handed
solution
America.
their
that
policy,
aimed at reaching
in its
initiative
are very
thoee
eituation.
We urge
peace in
country.
We also believe
the
and stable
strikes
problem
these
political
to that
to the
to reach a negotiated
solution
a dialogue
for a lasting
any efforts
speaking in the
to initiate
the other
a genuine
a peaceful
interference?
representatives
in order
of Nicaragua,
to sbfae
therefore
It
of
ia
by a
sbzuld
judgement ie executed.
full
responsibilities
to
to co;nply with
Court of uustice.
representative
of the Syrian
Arab
Republic
the
NS/at
S/W.2718
28
(The President)
The next speaker
I
Yeaen.
inoctihed
him to take
invite
Mr. Al-ABHTAL
particularly
pleased
enjoy
time
clofm
the high
preafdency
entrusted
We
Council
of this
preeiding
in
concrete
which
yourself
We feel
of the
country
with
that
term5
Arabic)8
from
a fraternal
qualities
of DemcnXatic
the deliberations
over
you represent
because
Indeed
table
Yemen) (interpretation
relations.
is the representative
(Democratic
'Phi8 is
Council.
security
on my list
worthy
you
which we
during
the
assumed the
have
of the responsibilities
to you.
8hoUl.d
gratitude
SWutitl?
like
5150
to avail
to Mr. Belonogov
Council
experience
Once
last
month with
new complaints
submitted
aggression
threat8
by
by
the
fnttra+3tiona2
of the united
instrument
Nations.
Netione,
in those
American Administration
to express
This
our
work of the
the
confirm8
Nicaragua
his greet
against
in
acta of aggres8ion.
by peaceful
Those effort8
anA
of
of act5 of
with
Council,
which is the
peace end
eecurfty.
which
ie because the
Thto
judgement
the
enhance the
bf international
the
regarding
hi8 Governiient'5
meana in aacordance
Itatee.
a &ear
i5 facing
lie confirmed
the Security
by other
series
he presented
which
undoubtedly
particularly
is seized
Nicaragua
the maintenance
dfacusoions,
Council
the Security
the diepute
for
months,
of
situation
to solve
three
Hinirter
of the United
and ability.
Adlainietr5tion.
the dangers
principle8
skill
opportunity
who conducted
American
expoab of the
effort8
Union,
Government of
the
hy the Foreign
COnthuOu8
of thie
field.
Snil fadad
credibility
great
Wain,
to a etatement
the Soviet
of
in the diplomatic
Snd
oureelvee
of
the
Internatianal
S/PV.2718
29-30
US/at
(Hr. Al-Ashtal,
Court of Justtce.
internal
on the contrary
affairs
eecalation
of Nicaragua
of it8
Nicaragua.
haa increased
it
a8 reflected
etivities
of international
law, au&
America.
Nicaraguas
Moroover,
it
to take into
FitBt,
Nicaragua
amount
its
cosplaint
International
Court Of Juetice,
coPsnunity to eettle
- struct
certain
the effort8
Council"e
facts
to the pacific
the Statute
of the
Secondly,
effect
that
international
countries,
peaueful
the International
Court of Justice
Statom
law, concerning
non-u8e of force,
maritise
navigation.
violatiou
It
in
of n8tional
to put
18
a8 follow8t
.'ons.
It
by the int9rnatiOhal
international
its
ColoVant
obligations
the internal
ewereignty
law.
Nation8 Charter
prOVisioIUB in
region.
of Anmrica to the
United
in the
responsibility
in accordance with
fnternationel
the
to it
and
of the Contadora
settleunt
Nations Charter
faced by Nicaragua.
in the
ey8tem in
tension
great
Yemenh
the political
8ubmitted
for
to establish
attempting
againot
di8puteo
support
i8 a saurll country
has mhmitted
interfereme
it8
aimed at overthrowing
the principles
in
its
Democratic
affaire
to
the
under
of other
and obstruction
of
S/PV.2718
31
(Mr. Al-Aehtal,
The Court
found
mercenaries
that
United States,
the
and by supporting
Nicaragua,
in contravention
Thirdly,
the negative
International
acts,
Statea
lo contrary
of the
of international
position
position
the creation
camunity
- by making it
political
settlement
iraposoible
to all
to the
America,
appropriate
It
America.
of ths
judgeraent
of Central
of the
process in Central
peace
against
lav.
in regard
to the
the
aggreaoion
was committing
principles
United
of Justice
Court
especially
of the
by training,
subversive
Uemaoratic Yemen)
conditione
al8o obstructs
the
to aohieve a Peaceful
and oOmprehen8ive
the Central
in
American
CegiOll.
Fourthly,
ehouldere
the
United
a particular
the maintenance
States,
responsibility
of international
international
peacefully.
On the contrary,
Use Of force
and
Democratic
averted
pace
so that
and tho
eolidarity
and stability.
States
of
the
with
in rejecting
to join
policies
aggressive
the
in the
America
which
in regard to
of the
affairs.
and pra&iCee
calls
upon
the
Security
to accept
region
Council
problems of Central
in Nicaraguas
Demccratic
a deterioration
peaplea
and refusing
.
intervention
Sovereignty
Nicaragus*e
of Justice,
resorts
it
persists
setcurity,
of Justice
Court
its
COntinUeS
ViOlsting
international
and
consensus
of the Security
member
pesce
aimed at
a permfment
of the situation
may be given
in Central
the
possibility
Council
and to
Court
America may be
of
living
in
S/PV.2718
32
(Hr.
The appeal to the
Court of Justice
united
States
use or threat
The
force
to use
are violations
Charter
the aepirations
of
and, moreover,
in central
and
law and
Yemen for
is the
sir,
to an end.
coming
efficiently
I believe
that
you
this
time I have
the first
end
this
affairs
extremely
united
with our
I thank
of
Nations
aspirations.
representative
the
Republic
of Iran.
month
way.
in
Council
Although,
of office,
in
record
the
the
Union of Soviet
well,
final
is therefore
extremely
as I have
I should like
said,
it
- since
- to congratulate
Council
you will
statement.
We are
term
successful
my sincere
the
affairs
have
of your
spoken
and on the
predeceseor,
the
of the
of the Security
- indeed in a masterly
and
amI
would facilitate
purposes
Islamic
Republic
presidency
month
the
Arabic):
table
your
Council
and
and skilfully
peace
in the interaal
of the
RAJAIE-XZRORASSANI(Ielamic
Of this month,
the
he addressed to me.
representative
day8
It
at variance
from
the International
of
America.
interference
international
Yemen)
of the international
international
to eatabliah
the decisions
~emcratic
reflects
territory
community to preserve
efforts
to respect
of Nicaraguan
security
States
Al-Ashtal,
to your
locialiet
Republics,
in a very
commendable manner,
drafted,
who
last
month.
After
had been
involved
ic the early,
waiting
those who
preparatory
for
the genie
s/W. 27 18
33
Wr. Rajais-Rhoraasani,
Republic
of Iran)
- were absolutely
and international
fulfilled
only
To it6
relationa.
for
if
signatories,
such an orderly
goodwill
the United
netmrk
Charter
in the Organisation
short-sightednese
international
in favour
of international
was the
international
legal
relations.
law, it
international
parochial
foundation
In the
that
Member States
of a functional
and universally
reepected
syetem.
In that
towards the
regard,
role
the attitude
of the perruanent
of the Organization
Government of
Nations
of force
- have
Covert
violation
of international
opetrations
Intelligence
of Justice
in particular
International
repeatedly
against
Regrettably,
law by the
United States
wer
just
the
of international
State8
Adminiatration.
the place,
illegal
however,
The principles
non-intervention
by the united
Nicaragua are
the
and for
Court of Justice.
violated
Council
Respect for
importance.
- such as non-aggression,
been
*aart and
significance.
ie of crucial
of the
Charter
of the security
member8
ie of great
Court
international
Centcal
for
Nations
promises of happiness,
the
way - upon
non-use
for
agency
that
of adminiletering
pattern
certain
Islamic
and the
Government.
n\sny of the
Agents of the
intervention8
in otirei
~G.iiitrie=
are captured.
The basic queetion
the
United
Statea
here,
Government
therefore,
in The
Hague
ie not the
or
in
the
filing
Security
of a complaint
COUnCil:
is
the
againet
basic
S/W.2718
34-35
(Hr. Rajaie-thoraasani,
Republic
of Iran)
ouostion
is whothor,
intermtional
their
l fncere
Wpine88
of all
Organfootion
ouppresoed
there
honert
that
hoped
- not unethioally
other
Ln8ttumentr
ba8i8
hut irqmrtially
mhort-eighted
of
reapuct
and elan
natione,
would function
They
statee.
kind of attitude,
is really
any future
for
The 8ignatories
of
with that
18lawic
international
and with
would,
aggreoofon
condoned
umler8tanding
- and that
the
of all
contmlated,
the principles
and coqrehea8ively,
that
the co-operation
ae the Charter
because
peace
because of their
effectively
international
interests.
for
the Organisation
joined
Mefaber
be
of the Charter
--at
on a agle&ive
the protection
of
Certain
and
S/W.
2718
36
(Mr. Rajsie-Khorassani,
Republic
of Iran)
They expected
of
honest
anJ consistent
against
of aggressor criminal
victimized
lives
nations
and property
Honesty,
turmoil,
Council
will
discover
deliberately
that
unhealthy
impertant
facts
and cleverly
We think
very
generations
We believe
choice of rescuing
the
that
convince
they
have
nations
their
buried
and attitudes
of this
and self-deceit.
are registering
It
is therefore
towards Nicaragua,
pCliCieS
importantly,
Council
Security
or even
the Organization.
and mre
ad
ugliness
of our so-called
United State8
some mmbere
the United
their
hut
it
depends upon
and irnesponsible
no option
for
finally
muat
sake
the
make the
differences
review
with
their
tneir
the
effort6
sincere
States
to remember that
thet
they
policies
of those
policies
of the United
States officials
to
is important
United
actions
t hemeelvea .
cripples
officials,
Organization
to control
As for
the
members.
of this
struggling
policies
present
Organization
overcome treachery,
of pr inoiples.
irresponsible
against
to free
which further
protection
the
rights.
their
States
in defence
united
to stand firmly
in order
present
Council,
been
ultimately
concealed
precedent,
of the Security
was written
back
to regain
and future
has
The Charter
were fighting
in order
beauty
whom war
clients.
that
functioning
Islamic
are
on the
Government.
wrong
are
and not
This
themselves accordingly.
neighbours , they
---.-L-DUG L~)YIII-L
is right
experiment
who
an8 practice6
states
and conduct
the
on themselves while
the
tt-tit
alI
for
results
of
s/W.
2718
37
IRK. Rajaie-Rhotassani,
Republic
of Iran)
their
experiments
therefore
give
belong
to tha entire
Nicaraguan
the
and to experiment
liking
nation.
for
human
their
to
problems.
their
They kmw
neighbours.
type of d-racy.
metrican
experience
with
of the
countries
to
States
urge
teccgnize
Government freely
will
delegation
draft
Bower
Natione,
rnternationai
has
and
been
eervice
158 legitimate
will
the
International
its
with
an
differences
We urge
with
the United
to choose theft
whole Organisation.
and we know,
system of
very
sadly,
body.
Court of Justice.
to
the
how the
their
The entire
celebrated
which the
My
relating
simply because
we recently
members, is waiting
decision
and negotiatione
member of thie
annivetearry
of the
out collective
to resolve
to make concession8
whose fortieth
come of
coercion.
iwttance
submitted
own
and sacrifices.
Government
consultations
the
a permanent
its
and enrich
their
and
necessarily
and constructively.
Council
great
ate pteseuted
along with
treat
the
following
which
nations
an arrogant
united
been
resolution
victimised
ii
has
efforts
any outside
is of very
minds to exercise
and not
out
of every
and disadvantages
advantages
it
tight
and without
make
own
region peacefully
the tight
that
own
ati
which they
made up their
United State8
the
sovereignty
own finding,
of their
the
the results
We therefore
tha
therefore
a democracy of their
with
solution
the
also about
have
must
aelf-detetmination.
They know
family.
Islamic
advereary
body of the
and to whose
General Assembly,
community
Council
should
S/W. 2718
38
(Mr. Rajaie-Khorassani,
Republic
of Iran)
condemn
the
illegal
member of this
actions
Council
t0wam.W
refresh
and itreeponoible
ita
present
the Organisation.
The WU%3fReNT(interpretation
of the Islamic
Republic
of Iran
draft
Emirates
for
decision
will
soon
resolution
submitted
is my undetstanding
that
the Council
Kingdom):
on the
resolution.
attaches
resolution,but
I must
the
Council
sat
- which is usually
of draft
It
is a good practice.
Council,
arxl the
in provisional
which states
exactly
taken to be approximately
resolutions
voting
on them.
I think
that
practice.
There
~0~18,
be many and urgent cases when we should have to vote more capidiy,
should
like
practice
it
to
be thought
to another practice
to unnecessary
conttove8y.
which
that
we were slipping
I think
to
24 hours -
Of course,
not
to
afternoon.
circulation
circulation
down this
rules of procedure
this
in our provisional
relationship
the
observe that
point
importance.
much
time after
There is nothing
cases
by
(S/18428).
which my delegation
what
of a permanent
from Arabic)
draft
to destroy
the delegations
It
The Council*6
neighbour.
and energixe
and Ipolicies
Please proceed.
choice.
Aram
practices
Islamic
but I
could lead to
inconvenience
and in Borne
thio
aftermnm,
that
it
I hcpe that
document
I am ready to vote
ie congruent
we shall
with
normally
on it.
document8
that
have a longer
becaure
the,
thio
I have men
parlod
there
provioicnal
before.
between the
Aingdcm)
text
of
I do
But in principle
circulation
of a
JSM/dw
s/w.
2718
41
reeolutfon
from Arabic):
Unleso
I hear
ltmre baing
any abjection,
mu objection,
it
ie
so decided.
I ahall
statement
firat
&fore
wt.
call
voting.
the
RASEMELFU
(Thailand):
I should like
Furthermore,
for
for
the affected
to reiterate
the
Central
in
non-interference
peaceful
the
in Central
America,
of the region
sovereignty
or territorial
peace efforts
of all
cm thie
death of
Thailands
affairs
delegation
sentiments
of other
of sympathy
reaffirmed
With
wishes to reiterate
full
to choose their
support
respect
its
State.
In this
of all
countrie8.
own political,
it
of
to the
conviction
or use of force
the
MOrewet,
States.
Statee.
of a neighbouring
ehould obtein
states
my delegation
with other
of disputes
my delegation
integrity
matter,
relations
that
againet
the
regard,
the
It
is
tnterfeeence.
Court
in El Salvador,
Council.
should refrain
from outeide
July
settlement
in the internal
the State5
Article
the
believes
Cm%dore
earthquake
international
eituation
before
aonveyed
of the Council
record
firmly
Republic
same for
the recent
regarding
to repeat
Thailands
has already
of his party,
viehee
My delegation
families.
United Nation8
of Juetice
contains
a solemn undertaking
of the
ia a party..
by every
S/W. 2716
YSN/dW
42
Although
United
the
State4
competenoe or jurisdiction,
United States
it
~4s considered
HoWeVeK, Article
takes the
is
position
fact
party
that
to the
94, parclgraph 2, of
to
case fails
the
Charter
to perform
to
the S4curity
has relied
this
meting.
Uowever, in convening
that
on this
indeed failed
Article
in this
states
the
that8
the oblig4tions
the
other
party
paragraph
it
in requesting
incumbent upon
may have
the Council
to perform
the
the Council
does not
recourse
to convene
facto
ipso
rficQgni2e
obligations
provision
obligations
intrinsically
Court
under
in2tanCe.
the Council
perform
of the
4nY
Council,.
Nicaragua
HOreWer,
.
have
in question.
~444
haa
the
in the determination
it
party
that
under
only
if
2 of
a judgelwnt
leg41 in neture.
in paragraph
that
of the Court,
4 party
has
failed
4 determination
to
which is
Article
had
of
initial
achieving
illlplicatione
ar
the
peaceful
peace
settlement
and security
of
of
all
the countries
a central
necess4rilY
possible
are certain
legal
the principle
are 9enerallY
Court.
law.
Indeed,
at this
peinciples,
recognised
the Court
stage,
particularly
and are
valid,
recognised
my delegation
believes
principles
it
means
but
the
in mind its
in Central
pillar,
action
with or without
theee
by practical
is
hnerica.
not
by the Council.
There
of non-intervention,
any elaboration
as customary
tcr be more
conetructive
which
by the
international
for
the
s/w. 2718
43
Mr.
Council
to attempt
Groups
which
American
up their
themselves
on Article
peace
up their
given
hand,
to assist
aeasucee
States
to rely
practical
over-reliance
Kaeewri,
OWI efforts.
can still
play
on Article
the Clontadora
initiatives8
Timiland)
Therefore,
a useful
94, at this
without
role
at this
stage,
will
having
juncture.
prove
to be
counter-productive.
To enhance
the
draft
effectiveness
Council
Security
results,
it8
should
espaaially
Despite
delegation
S/18428,
COUnCil,
which,
appropriate
Legret,
in the opinion
the present
---.--L
-Yarllar
..L.
um3 previcrue
resolution
will
in C8ntral
America
'United
Nationa.
and their
draft
that
about
the desired
to adopt
failed
find8
the
the regional
with
to
the draft
thst
94, pose8
re8tore
help
could
of America):
in ordeo
to a peaceful
dileam
for
Ststee
and just
fzarpgwtxk of international
in Juiy.
setttewnt
the
mote
an end to
mmerica.
on the draft
The United
subject
to take
to bring
in Central
abstain
essentially
on the 8me
in
hostilitfes
will
reeolution
an unresolved
settlemnt,
my delegation
for
my
region.
and military
States
closely
GLOup, in order
of my delegation,
reeoiution
not contribute
within
to bring
in some quarters,
acre
Support
is on Article
resolution
&z&t
work
American
confliut
had recently
of futility
of a peaceful
in pursuit
therefore,
it
my delegation
baaed as it
political
measure8
that
feeling8
action
the Qngecous
is with
Statee
of the foregoing,
dmumnt
practical
the Contadora
internatiOnal
subjeot.
the understandable
prefer
for
of the fact
On a similar
would
~WberE,
look
in view
reeolutiOn
in maintaining
resolution.
will
vote
that
it
Tkis
of the
It
voted
draft
8ituatiOn
s/w. 2718
44-45
JsM/dw
(WC. Walters,
We have heard Statea
juriadictian
of tha Intornatiooal
not accepting
that
here is mat
despite
Nicaragw@s
reality
of the oituatdon
International
murt
jurbdiction
done,
Of it8
that
Statute
jurisdiction.
&tenuous
of Justice,
of Justice
not simply
to pretend
Aneriaa
to render.
the coapulsory
the United
by hiding
States
for
that
a decision
the Court
concerning
the
aa 8oipe have
36, paragraph
that
the
of the
had neither
to clailp,
because Article
disputes
question,
we cannot ardeatep
behind
a legal
otherwise.
says that
denounce
Stems)
do not accept=
emphatically
efforts
in central
nor coapetence
the aurt
Court
What ia at stake
themselves
United
6,
S/W.2718
16
(Hr.
But no Court,
to aeaert
jurisdiction
and negotiating
claim
Council,
of jurisdiction
in law or f8ct.
the earlier
will
not
iq)oteG
The draft
the
conflict.
enough
these
the
A8 I have
a resolution
America.
However,
note of Niuaragua'e
before
stated
in
the
it
decieion
of the International
situation
in Central
Am8rics.
eituation
a8 merely
a conflict
this
people
with
between
of Central
the
the
States
mad
before
during
not
this
State8
United
to
ha
Council
and the
Government
the
United
Sandinistas
ie reepon8ible
re;zlut?o::
it
mighboUC8,
all
to
resolution
take8
in that
troubled
for
of
Central
the
picture
a false
and
in
situation
portray
Nicaragua
of its
The dreft
of support
issues
is prepared
peace
a one-sided
to
Giise
on the real
focus
current
Juetice,
ARBrica,
The sandiniats
with
the
in the guise
attempts
Court8
of a rei3OlutiOh
position
contribution
for
It
the
by
foundation
and
by the Couneil
of
instrumfmts
by the united
u8 do88 not
pa&,
Court
language
Internatimal
that
record
paver
hu%fica.
a genuine
seeks to predent,
legal
in Nicaragua'8
i8
wm re8pon8ibility
Inetead,
the
defect8
draft
and the
clear
of public
approval
which
prssent
region.
Government,
to e&iy that
which rake8
the
a watter
States)
The
of those
presented
of peace in Central
crude
re6ObtfOn
Impport
all
haas the
Natious
make ahuudantly
effect
United
juriadicticn.
in the Nicaragua
to this
fatal
that
interpretatiorr
States,
St is
serve
consirrtent
We&r
The argument8
repeated here.
Simply
anil
for
of the united
and coqetence
phaSe8
that
as the
Court of Justice,
exist0
of the Charter
a8 well
this
Court,
Internatioml
where no bsaie
history
of Juetice,
Court
the
Walters,
no
27 June
of the
image of this
State&
My
themselv88
for
the
know
crieie.
!zc *trayed;
of whom it
that
It
f+ haa
has
Bought
S/W.2718
47
Walters,
(Mr.
In
previous
Sandinistas
statements
have betrayed
pointa
essential
reconciliation
Council
the Nicaraguan
I have elaborated
revolution
however.
and
The Sandinistas
zore than
the
in refusing
any dialogue
reconciliation
agreed in principla
Parties
its
support
an ending to the
to general
day of prayer
neighbours
region?
nmuxtiaC~n+
-4
arms.
Their
example:
Opposition
arms
1983.
have
intransigent
bean
true
in
Yet
national
on 27 October
the
on 23 October
six opposition
of hostilities,
production
of its
political
a general
amnesty,
of a new electoral
good faith,
call
the
forces
another
attempt
If
Nicaragua
really
law
of
the
John Paul II
by Pope
yet
would
largest
vould
Draft
mnCmtyt
received
like
Act
nf
have
army
in
of sophisticated
at the Sandinista
have
in
IIeighboUrS?
amassed the
Contadora
prcpoeel
of the
the hietoric
observed
The Sandinietas
A lock
cessation
A@ a token
with an arsenal
within
they
to the
Opposition
for a
to develop a proper
reconoiliation.
why has it
of
September
proposal
Nicaragua8
and eouipped it
this
looking
and petace
abOUt
30 January
the
elections.
for national
What
opmsitlon
time , they
for
state
United Nicaraguan
climate
with their
contrast,
for a dialogue
leading
since that
years
in
to both of
and democratisation.
In drematic
reiterated
three
Two of the
are national
people.
Nicaraguan
to this
United States)
but
in
t%ntuPrrrm
-...------
proposal
virtually
dozen6
us to
believe
fact
they
kp
hraadl
-----
reveals
122
millimetre
of Central
history
Soviet
no impact
of
the
its
America
weapons unprecedented
that
they
ou~l~m4velv
--------
--~
the extent
on their
multiple
willing
are
have insisted
that
M
-..
of the
enormous
rocket
in
IA
-_
to
arm
entolmriaa
---~-----
duplicity.
army.
For
launchers,
s/W.
2718
48
(Wr.
so they
propose
received
to limit
rockets
120 aillimetresj
than
and artillery
ouantitiee
of towed
self-propelled
said that
made suite
of their
Clear
that
they
propose to
have
limit
scores of.towed
artillery
self-propelled
only
have received
they
Only
propose to limit
large
only
guns.
list
of arms.
Most of the
to discuss
would refuse
they
the Sandinietaa
weapons
to consider
strongly
favours
do not
placing
PrOceSs in the?r
efforts
abide by an agreement
implementatton
have
They have
have.
any limits
on the size
to produce a regional
it
to
the Sandinieta
ie
significant
in Centre?.
of the
members
settlement.
that
Contedora
My Govetnment
verifiable
would
end simultaneous
negotiations.
Nicaragua
would like
very
ehort
necjatiating
memories.
that
we have
many
for
a six-month
resolution
believe
process.
before
it
that
The
the
in
blocked
for Peace.
to have us all
P.--AL
r,.rJ &laI...- --,~-r-..(n=n*rcd
WV..--------= -- -
as consistently
a formula
draft
the
through
example, they
the
achieved a comprehensive,
that
CefeP
supported
solution
Regrettably,
connection,
political
a negotiated
America.
peace
States)
hug@ army.
Mu Government
even
have received
guns , 80 they
might be wiliing
they
so they
anki-aircraft
anti-aircraft
mortars,
they
united
122 milliaetreuz
then
of more
efforts
larger
mortars
only
Walters,
peace
negotiations.
has
In
process.
this
us today
does not
avenue for
achieving
displayed
sandinistae
that
the
flexibility
seem to
we have
Last
Furthermore,
aesume
forgotten
year,
the
for
at the
AP/mh
S/TV.2716
49
(Hr.
1986
Contadora
April
, the
meeting
Foreign
for preventing
Statea)
refusal
by the
American
Ministers
United
to
%CCePt
as by the four
any progress
in
the
fat ions.
negot
agreement.
been
and
are unacceptable
this
and
yet
refuses
In July
and
basic ouestions
their
programs% in which
leaders
against
aggression
peace.
and
to sign the
latest
American deskxracies.
Nicaragua
all
opportunities
their
answers.
neighbours
granted
knows
and
democratic
can
they
choose
refuse
opposition
in
free
to
to answer.
seriously
negotiate
Council
by this
down at
and negotiate
and
fair
want.
some very
still
Sandinistir
The
members of the
of government
type
own
representatives
of Nicaragua
people
representative
towards their
intentions
the freouent
these
with
the
is has
that
Sandinists
the
is willing
compromi8e.
to provide
table
th%t it
terms
their
the bargaining
to the Central
Despite
Let me try
us to believe
However, the
last
about
to mike
their
to
again
neighbours.
them
elections
their
to restore
regional
Mr.
delegstion
remains deeply
It
question
is to be found in
holds that
and in respect
countries
in respect
for
the
of the
basis
Central
for
from Chinese)
the tension
the settlement
the elimination
the State
in Central
(interpretation
concerned &out
region.
all
Nicaraguan
Walters,
soverelgnty,
America.
of
in the
The Chinese
Central
of the Central
interference
by all
American
American
outside
Interference
American countries
and infiltration
will
only aggravate
forces
integrity
of whatever
existing
of
form
tensions
(Mr.
and unrest
and further
ttm Central
between
United State8
csoqlicate
American countries
should be mottled
principles
8umt
thi8
pocition,
to.
#ation
through
and
internatimal
relation8
that
the
of the Internation
vote
problem
an an e-1
by the oountriem
will
conrultatiamo
Charter , anl
The judgment
delegation
China)
should be respsated
the Chineme
and
peacefully
in tha united
not be resorted
with
China
the problem.
Li Luye,
comertwl.
in favour
of the
uw
or
the
anti thm
threat
of
Court of Jumtke
Prooreding
draft
fIOr
rerolution.
S/i?V.2718
Sl
JP/&J
PRESIOE~,(interpretation
The
resolution
contained
in document
from Atahic)t
the draft
WlS43S.
favour:
Aumttalia,
Bulgaria,
China,
Congo,
Denmark,
Ghana, Madagascar,
Trinidad and Tobago, Union of Soviet Socialist
Republics, united
Arab Emirates, Venezuela
Againat:
United
Abmtainingt
Prance,
of America
stat55
Thailad,
United
and Northern
Ireland
The PREXDEIOT (interpretation
am follows:
ha5
11 vote6
favour,
in
froa
1 against
3 abstentions.
The draft
vote of a permanent
member
and
ia
resolution
of
the
council.
security
I shall
now call
after
otatmentta
on those representativea
the
Bircuae
the
dispute
of Justice
Court
ragaraing
which
was
dehatea
central
Amar ica.
On this
t
the
Council
When the
subject
of
the
the International
Co~wil
Court
we alao M&
clear
therefore,
Occasion,
role of the
of the important
our
Xnternational
COUbpUl8Ory
jurisdiction
is
our
which
Court
in and aupport
represents
which
in
this
if more
for
led
the
previous
Security
rituation
in
in the peaceful
States
body
Melnber
principlee
us to vote
to
no understandings
it would be appropriate
firm belief
the
for #emEm
year
International
overall
of Juetice
Court
the neceeeity
and
the
to say that
vordicte.
It
and of
it
of ai8putes
In our view,
to make
Denmark8 position
that
concerning
this
of the
judgement
During
view8
euffice
met in July
explained
of Justice.
aettlematnt
kind.
to be all&
voting.
justice
of the voting
The result
Arabic):
in
the court6
to accept
to
hava
accepted
or reeetvatione
States
did
of any
likewiae.
of international
favour
of
the
the
draft
JP/P&J
S/PV. 27lS
s2
(Hr.
reaolutiar
tiich
has just
dosigre3
fathere
Indeed,
for
Bierring,
lmaark)
thdse pcincipl.8
this
oetve
the v*y
frimdly
of
CeldtioM
between
mtions.
Sir John TKWSON (Miitsd
pmiticm
that we suppoct
alSO fully
cm of the five
ammlsay
jur isdictian
Charter
ablipstiar,
obligatione,
That is
not
political
Court
we do
and
upon itself.
not
a &aft
to support
with
it
but
Inter
on mny
a rigime
Jlich
TQO
my omntry
aooepts the
to call
fot selective
for
Charter,
the
but
of Justiae
Court
leas
a&antsge
of
it
for
is a
the
nor ihtetxally
of the Chartet
application
taking
deoioiono
externally
neither
whi&
fails
challenge
the
rasolutiar
that
thetefae
occaeiohs expteaeed
lives
up
in this case.
natrcm
haa
largely
brought
(interpretation
from Prench)t
my uountry
to reamciliation.
its
tmublrr
abstained.
In particular,
and leading
Nicaragua
accost
Prence@o pitioll
its
desire
to take
in the Council
in Central
America.
on legal
resolution
t&rich fails
to adcnmledge
My delegation
draft
prevailing
dialogue
of the Chmter-
nation&L
ie nothing
mthority
established
ends.
While
factors
respect
law md tie
Governwnts
par ties
GOVefhment of Nicaragua,
to ite
is y
of the court.
by the
CWplianca
clear
krtePnatiana1
the International
support
ie the arry
Kingdom)% It
of the carflicts
it
is for
on the situation
has amotently
in that
this
bSy delegation
reaam
atea
that
based
preclatied
On
we have
given
G/W. 27 16
53
JP/ PLJ
to give
continue
Cantadora Group.
plrbliehed
our suppart
In that
to the effocto
connection,
an 1 October by the
of
corntries
artier
oomtcier
note of
we took particular
Frames)
of the
the Declaration
6uPpart
Group.
The Frehch Goverruent
termion
in the region
wntinue
to hope that,
satisfaatory
in
the obotsclae
solutim
will
finally
cmntext,
the French
be
found
extenion
encxwntired,
in order
ovu
ad
the grGsi.ng
esaahtim.
We
a coopcebanslive,
to
ensure
pace
and
security
region.
the
In this
pwitiar
to make a significant
a&pting
a draft
on 31 Yuly,
Inter national
obliged
It
liked
the Counoil
to thoee efforts
queetiarable
cmas again
would have
ilelegatiou
carteikwtiar
resolution.
references
Court
by maimuely
it
before
as did that
oontaino,
to
judgemmt handed
the
of Jwtia,,
both
QI matter@ of
that my delegatim
I&
me make it
aboalutely
clear
that
speak,
rather,
in emmoise of y
ri*t
a0 a me*er
failed
COWbOil.
That cotme
of action
legitimate,
and we respect
regret
the Comcil
mat
Inteonationsl
in this
teeolution,
to t&e
the
a daaieiau
is within
Council
of
wdS
Bought to
of re#y,
butr
on 8 lendmark mse.
by.a
pertmnmt
so made.
to act
un&rpin
indiated
and 3 abrtaining.
of the
and
Harever,
in favour
This
aedwf
and thereby
1 againet
I have
Counoil.
the decieiosl
Court of Juatioa
lS-me*er
to be in a
to abaeah.
draft
of those countriea
of
the judgeRent
the Charter,
partiaularly
of the
when
JP/&J
s/~V.2718
54-M
Hr.
This
mommtouu
ineig,ifbmt
corntries
constitute8
Therefore,
functioning
of
of intacnatianal
of the
non-slimed
recently
hae lemon
muds 88 mine.
the underpinning
idQlltity.
States
decision
the
relationa
Organizatian,
oountcies
at a sumit
Ouu
Natione
that
especially
attacirmnt
to
reiterated
Ghana)
srrallmdmilitarily
the
idea
covereiglty
of the United
md nstianal
aleo undermines
md the mited
whi&
meeting
all,
my development
United
fa
Gtmho,
mtiono
our
cwn sowereiglty
is bared
theic
Ascrica
and efficient
concern
by amr
anb
the
in a ueclaratim
This view
100 rmber
conw
:n of
adoptred
the
m/17
S/F%. 2718
56
(Mr. Gbeho, Ghana)
The decirion
Paradigm
faith
of What oould
to contain
constitute
the threat
it will
regression
which,
a political
teaches
us that
failed
to adhere
aettleslgnt
we all
act
is a
and in good
in Central
in the Contadora
generally
is legal,
together
and security
peace
achieve
9 must repeat,
unless
to international
In that regard,
Aawrica.
that
taken
process
acceptable
in the hope
to all
the parties
concerned.
history
because
they
their
existence
Nationa
bodies
and therefore
founded
politically
equal
ocrupulous
to
the decision
hopeful,
howver,
eludes
can still
to improve
relatious
the rules,
prineiplee
col\sider
have their
fathers
misfortunes
conditioned
of our united
of other
international
sovereignty
the complainant
the cullective
that
we have collectively
that
came to grief
guarerrteed
through
aud indeed
be employed
made
wisdom,
to promote
and objectivee
aa, indeed,
today.
all
of ~8~
remains
initiative,
of the entire
it eludes
creativity
membership
to the present
of the United
Council
of the united
in Central
dispute,
Hations.
That
AD1Brica,
and to uphold
is what wa
work
aeoiduousU
to attain.
C&e PRESIDENT
Nicaragua
has asked
as
the Charter.
Organisation,
adherence
of the earlier
this
X&ions
and objectives
the founding
Indeed,
the lessons
fra
of the United
to the principles
and functiooing.
profited
the large
many forerunners
(interpretation
to make a statement
from Arabic):
The representative
on her.
of
MN/l7
S/PV. 2718
57
wm
Security
tlicaragua)
Council
United
steterL
uorked
againat
wm unable
to adopt
Once again
to he an outlaw
international
ccmwnity.
has opted
it
to ohmge
political
coneiderr
it
Being
to set itself
violateo
will.
international
a large
judge
with
laws
negative
vote
It has ratifid
rertolution
in its
The
today,
has
ita
above the
international
and powerful
to oruah smaller
up as the sale
by
for
ito
the draft
in the Council
nations
Spanieh)
Wations.
among Statec
In vetoing
tree
with
States,
of the United
detwaination
council,
a resolution
the United
the Charter
the non-aligned
(interpretation
nations.
of international
this
veto
it
relatiom
St&e,
It
relations.
rejects
in order
a super-Rouer,
considera
it
it
With
the maceful
of the
this
veto,
6ettlement
it
of
dieputes.
5?Oday we haard
occa6ion6,
defend
the representative
State
United
States
siaply
United
Btates
governe
JUIt
peoples
reconfirm8
its
a8 it amma
fighting
for
~elfdeteraination,
declaration
their
judgement
vital
for
need to enaure
Stat68
respect
sovereignty
debate
it
that
the peaceful
for
on mattere of life
has preventeil
This
veto by the
and irreeponmibility
to dacide
In this
86 in previous
with
which the
relative.
independence,
the United
State8,
and ignoniny.
the illegality
the right
Organisation
war, death
international
of principles.
Of the Court6
thie
terCroriem,
of the United
intetnational
the Counail
has called
death
for
to
from adopting
into question
the validity
to continua
tgettlemwh
and right
and
to we all
of diaputee
in order
the machinery
to reaffirm
of
the
the law? of
S/PV. 2718
58
AIQI/l7
(*a.
the jungle
cawt
in international
be passed wer
to aak about
Udted
States
After
in silence.
when it
subscribed
for C#Ux
and understanding
insorihed
cm ry lie.
conoideration
The
all
that
the Charter
is left
entered
is at stake and
for 0~8 to do is
into
by the
of the United
countries?
from Arabic):
Security
council
The meting
nations
between civilised
The PRESIDEWE(interpretation
mall
and validly
to and ratified
rrtage of its
the veto,
Natiuw.
Wmkerrr
fate of
tie
celatiam.
the present