Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Chemical Engineering Department, Instituto Superior Tecnico, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal
b Departamento de Engenharia de Cer
amica e do Vidro, Universidade de Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal
Received 28 May 2004; received in revised form 9 September 2004; accepted 9 September 2004
Abstract
The anticorrosive performance of two inhibitive pigments, zinc chromate and zinc phosphate, was compared using electrochemical
impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and the scanning vibrating electrode technique (SVET) in pigment extracts in 0.1 M NaCl. It was observed
that zinc was protected from corrosion in both extracts. In tests using hot dip galvanised steel painted with an epoxy primer incorporating the
pigments, the SVET detected the anodic and cathodic distribution along the scribes, although no significant differences were observed among
the various primers. On the contrary, EIS was able to distinguish processes occurring on the metal surface exposed by the scribe in different
samples. For primers with anticorrosive pigment, a time constant at high frequencies was attributed to a layer of protective nature, probably
formed by metal ions from the substrate and inhibitive ions leached from the anticorrosive pigments.
2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Anticorrosive pigments; Corrosion; EIS; SVET; Zinc; Phosphate; Chromate
1. Introduction
Decades of industrial practice have lead to the selection
of a few pigments with excellent anticorrosive properties in a
wide range of situations. Chromates have long been the first
choice for many applications, but they represent environmental and health threats that are leading to their replacement.
Among the new non-toxic anticorrosive pigments that today
line up as substitutes for traditional pigments, zinc phosphate
is probably the most widely accepted, and it is incorporated
in many paint formulations.
Although not fully understood, the inhibitive action of
chromate pigments is now well accepted to be based on the
chromate ions that leach out to solution, where they act in the
same way as other chromate soluble inhibitors. In solution,
chromate ions are present in the hexavalent form and become
reduced to the trivalent form to counterbalance the anodic
oxidation of the metal substrate. It is the trivalent chromium
Corresponding author.
E-mail address: alda.simoes@ist.utl.pt (A.M. Simoes).
0300-9440/$ see front matter 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.porgcoat.2004.09.009
340
2. Experimental
2.1. Bare metal samples
Zinc 99.95% pure, in the shape of 1-mm thick foil
(produced by Goodfellow Ltd., UK) was used. For EIS,
1 cm 1 cm samples were electrically connected via a multithread copper wire with silver conductive adhesive and epoxy
0.1 M NaCl
Chromate extract
Phosphate extract
a
b
c
d
pHa
Conductivityb
(mS cm1 )
Concentration
6.20
6.55
6.43
9.44
10.90
9.46
341
Fig. 1. Samples used in the experiments. (a) Mounted bare zinc for EIS measurements in extracts, (b) mounting for SVET measurements of bare zinc in extracts,
(c) coated sample glued with epoxy for SVET measurements (d) cell for EIS measurements on scribed coated samples.
3. Results
3.1. Bare metal electrodes
SVET current mapping made on pure zinc immersed in
sodium chloride solution shows significant differences. In
the salt solution without pigment, activity occurred always
with the development of one single anode and one single
cathode (Fig. 2a). Each of these electrodes occupied nearly
half of the surface in the first minutes of immersion. With
time, the anodic area became more localized (Fig. 2b) until,
after approximately 1 day, a pit was observed on the surface
(Fig. 2c and d).
When the NaCl solution contained the pigment extracts
the current inhibition was obvious. The current values measured on the surface were significantly reduced and there
was only weak indication of cathodic or anodic activity, with
the pattern of the surface corresponding to scattered microscopic and weak activity, corresponding to currents below
342
Fig. 2. SVET maps of the ionic currents measured 200 m above pure zinc exposed to: 0.1 M NaCl (ac); zinc phosphate extract in 0.1 M NaCl (eg); zinc
chromate extract in 0.1 M NaCl (ik). Times of immersion are (top to bottom): 5 min, 1 h and 1 day. Scanned area: 1.25 mm 1 mm; Scale units: A cm2 .
Also shown are pictures of the surface after 1 day of immersion in each solution (d, h, l).
Fig. 3. Open circuit potential of pure zinc in 0.1 M NaCl, either uninhibited
or containing phosphate extract or chromate extract.
343
Fig. 4. Impedance spectra obtained for pure zinc at different times of exposure to 0.1 M NaCl, without inhibitor (a), or containing phosphate extract (b) or
chromate extract (c); (a1), (b1) and (c1) are Bode plots, whereas (a2), (b2) and (c2) are the corresponding Nyquist plots.
344
Fig. 5. General equivalent circuit and fittings for pure zinc in 0.1 M NaCl without inhibitor (a) and with zinc chromate extract (b). Fitting parameters for (a) Rs = 34.4 cm2 ; Y0 (Q1 ) = 1.62 105 F cm2 sn1 ; n(Q1 ) = 0.872; R1 = 1.31 103 cm2 ; Y0 (Q2 ) = 6.06 104 F cm2 sn1 ; n(Q2 ) = 1;
R2 = 631 cm2 ; 2 = 3.9 104 . Fitting parameters for (b) Rs = 26.2 cm2 ; Y0 (Q1 ) = 3.31 106 F cm2 sn1 ; n(Q1 ) = 0.903; R1 = 1.74 105 cm2 ;
Y0 (Q2 ) = 6.51 106 F cm2 sn1 ; n(Q2 ) = 0.500; R2 = 1.14 106 cm2 ; 2 = 1.0 103 .
345
Fig. 6. Fit parameters for the impedance spectra obtained for pure zinc at different times of exposure to 0.1 M NaCl only, to phosphate extract in 0.1 M NaCl
and to chromate extract in 0.1 M NaCl.
frequencies. Fitting of the spectra was made using the equivalent circuit in Fig. 8, where the high frequency impedance
(1 k cm2 ) is due to the electrolytic solution at the scribe.
RHF and QHF describe the high frequency process, and Rct
and Qdl correspond to the charge transfer resistance and the
double layer capacitance, respectively. Finally, a component
describing the mass transfer impedance was considered in
some cases in order to account for a small tail appearing below 0.1 Hz. The high frequency process had a resistance of
510 k cm2 , as shown in Fig. 9, whereas the Y0 for this
process has a value of roughly 108 to 105 F cm2 . This
capacitance is too high for a polymer film, which generally
has values in the range of 1010 to 108 F cm2 [27,29].
Further, in the presence of chromate Y0 decreases with time,
a behaviour that is the opposite to the known evolution of
coating capacitance values (which tend to increase due to
water uptake). This high frequency time constant can however be explained by the formation of the passivating film, of
either chromium hydroxide or zinc phosphate. The formation
of this film starts in the first minutes of exposure, possibly
with the precipitation of a monolayer, and grows afterwards,
during the first 2448 h. The low frequency process gives
Rct = 2080 k cm2 and is maximum for the chromate. The
double layer CPE grows with time, revealing the growth of
the active area underneath the coating, i.e., delamination. The
ratio of Y0 with and without pigment is roughly 0.1, meaning that the loss of adhesion was weaker in samples with
pigment. The delamination rate, estimated from the CPE,
was minimum in the epoxychromate coating, followed by
the epoxyphosphate and finally by the clear coat. This was
the same rate that was determined by visual inspection of the
samples at the end of the test.
The SVET was also used to study the ionic current distribution above the scribed samples, for the three coatings
in 0.1 M NaCl. The evolution of the current maps and the
current density values have not show any significant differences among the specimens with the various coatings. As an
example, Fig. 10 shows SVET measurements of the scribed
HDG sample, coated with the clear epoxy paint. In the first
346
Fig. 7. Bode and Nyquist impedance plots of scribed samples of HDG, coated with epoxy primer with pigment, after 1 h (a) and 1 day (b) of exposure in 0.1 M
NaCl. (a1) and (b1): Bode plots; (a2) and (b2): corresponding Nyquist plots.
4. Discussion
The inhibiting power of anti-corrosive pigments depends
upon a number of parameters, namely the pigment solubility,
347
Fig. 8. Equivalent circuit and fitting of impedance spectra for the scribed samples of HDG in 0.1 M NaCl with chromate primer (a) and with
phosphate primer (b). Fitting parameters for (a) Rscribe = 775 cm2 ; Y0 (QHF ) = 3.05 108 F cm2 sn1 ; n(QHF ) = 0.844; RHF = 9.04 103 cm2 ;
Y0 (Qdl ) = 6.76 107 F cm2 sn1 ; n(Qdl ) = 0.630; Rct = 7.33 104 cm2 ; 2 = 5.2 104 . Fitting parameters for (b) Rscribe = 990 cm2 ;
Y0 (QHF ) = 1.20 105 F cm2 sn1 ; n(QHF ) = 0.551; RHF = 5.47 103 cm2 ; Y0 (Qdl ) = 6.79 106 F cm2 sn1 ; n(Qdl ) = 0.768; Rct = 2.73 105 cm2 ;
2 = 2.2 104 .
A
L
where is the relative permitivity, 0 the permitivity of vacuum, A the area and L is the film thickness. Provided the
dielectric properties of the layer remain constant, the drop
348
Fig. 9. Fit parameters of the impedance spectra of scribed painted HDG at different times of exposure to 0.1 M NaCl.
of the delamination process. Since the cathodic and anodic reactions have to balance each other, then a large ratio between
the cathodic and the anodic areas will lead to a small density
of the cathodic current. The cathodic current is essentially
due to the reduction reaction of oxygen:
O2 + 2H2 O + 4e 4OH
and occurs at the metalcoating interface, thus leading to an
increase of pH (responsible for the rupture of coating metal
bonds and/or to saponification of the coating) but also to an
accumulation of anions in a confined region. Compensation
of this excess of anions can be achieved either by the outward flow of the hydroxyl anions themselves or, more easily
by the inward flow of cations. As pointed out by Leidheiser
and Wang [31], the high concentration of Na+ in the outer
solution makes them the most likely cations to migrate to
the front of the delamination. Migration of sodium cations
to the delamination front was confirmed by Stratmann, who
found an excess of sodium in the delaminated area but also
in a thin area considered to be beyond the delamination front
[32]. This migration of cations can occur in two ways: either across the coating or from the scribe. This last possibility, however, would mean that other cations would migrate
from the bulk into the scribe, generating a significant ionic
349
Fig. 10. SVET maps of ionic currents measured 200 m above a scribe in HDG coated with clear epoxy paint, after (a) 2 days and (b) 7 days of exposure to
0.1 M NaCl. Also presented are micro-video images of the corresponding sample area.
5. Conclusions
Protection of zinc by pigments of zinc chromate and zinc
phosphate was monitored by EIS, SVET and OCP, with good
agreement between the three techniques.
Evaluation of the electrochemical parameters for the bare
zinc in pigment extracts allowed the ranking of the decreasing
corrosion resistance in the extracts in 0.1 M NaCl as: chromate > phosphate > plain salt solution. Interpretation of the
impedance spectra of the scribed coatings has shown that the
equivalent circuit is identical to that of the bare metal in a
first stage, whereas the processes occurring underneath the
coating start to appear in a second stage. A high frequency
relaxation constant observed in the scribed, pigmented coatings, was assigned to the formation of a protective layer of
pigment underneath the coating. The decreasing rate of delamination, taken as the rate of growth of the double layer
capacitance, was the same, i.e., chromate > phosphate > clear
coat.
References
[1] J.E.O. Mayne, P. Ridgway, Br. Corros. J. 3 (1974) 177.
[2] E. McCafferty, M.K. Bernett, J.S. Murday, Corros. Sci. 28 (1988)
559.
[3] W. Meisel, E. Mohs, H.-J. Guttman, P. Gutlich, Corros. Sci. 23
(1983) 465.
[4] Z. Szklarska-Smialowska, R.W. Staehle, J. Electrochem. Soc. 121
(1974) 1146.
[5] A.I. Onuchukwu, J.A. Lori, Corros. Sci. 24 (1984) 833.
[6] S. Virtanen, M. Buchler, Corros. Sci. 45 (2003) 1405.
[7] H.S. Isaacs, S. Virtanen, M.P. Ryan, P. Schmuki, L.J. Oblonsky,
Electrochim. Acta 47 (2002) 3127.
[8] W.J. Clark, J.D. Ramsey, R.L. McCreery, G.S. Frankel, J. Electrochem. Soc. 149 (2002) B179.
[9] C. Gabrielli, M. Keddam, F. Minouflet-Maurent, K. Ogle, H. Perrot,
Electrochim. Acta 48 (2003) 935, 1483.
[10] M. Svoboda, J. Mleziva, Prog. Org. Coat. 12 (1984) 251.
[11] M. Kendig, R. Buchheit, Corrosion Inhibition of Al and Al Alloys by
Hexavalent Cr Compounds a mechanistic overview, in: Proceedings
of Corrosion/2000Surface Conversions of Aluminum and Ferrous
Alloys for Corrosion Resistance, NACE, 2000.
[12] J. Barraclough, J.B. Harrison, J. Oil Col. Chem. Ass. 48 (1965) 341.
[13] J.E.O. Mayne, Br. Corros. J. 5 (1970) 106.
[14] M. Beiro, A. Collazo, M. Izquierdo, X.R. Novoa, C. Perez, Prog.
Org. Coat. 46 (2003) 97.
350
[25] I.M. Zin, R.L. Howard, S.J. Badger, J.D. Scantlebury, S.B. Lyon,
Prog. Org. Coat. 33 (1998) 203.
[26] A. Amirudin, C. Barreau, R. Hellouin, D. Thierry, Prog. Org. Coat.
25 (1995) 339.
[27] J. Titz, G.H. Wagner, H. Spahn, M. Herbert, K. Juttner, W.J. Lorenz,
Corrosion 46 (1990) 221.
[28] R.L. Zeller III, R.F. Savinell, Corr. Sci. 26 (1986) 389.
[29] A.S. Castela, A.M. Simoes, Corr. Sci. 45 (2003) 1631.
[30] J.G.N. Thomas, The mechanism of corrosion prevention by inhibitors, in: L.L. Shreir, R.A. Jarman, G.T. Burstein (Eds.), Corrosion, vol. 2, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 1994, Chapter
17.3.
[31] H. Leidheiser Jr., W. Wang, Rate controlling steps in the cathodic delamination of 1040 m thick polybutadiene and epoxypolyamide coatings from metallic substrates, in: H. Leidheiser Jr.
(Ed.), Corrosion Control by Organic Coatings, NACE, Houston,
1981.
[32] W. Furbeth, M. Stratmann, Corros. Sci. 43 (2001) 207.