SMAN 1 Krian A

Widyah Angraeni Claudia Narinda Rahma Putri

case N-3-A on the matter of the Sandal thievery case by an under-aged citizen
Sandal thievery case by an under aged citizen
The Government side would like to ask to the court to decide that,
1.

The court decision has exhausted all easing aspects of an under aged defendant

2.

The judgment has been, in any manner, fair compared to other similar case

Statement of Facts
Justice for Juvenile defendant is that people be held responsible for criminal who
are responsible to take responsibility in crime. When The court has decision to punish as
guilty, we think it is fair. The main purpose of a fairnesse is to prevent crime and give
safety for people. To get that purpose unde aged defendant must not be punished safely.
Other soft punishments should a secondary choice. When Theyre criminals, if the effects
from children is not more dangerous than that caused by adults in a same case, they should
not be punished to soft treatment. Mostly clearly shows that juveniles do not take crime in
seriousness because they belief that they will be treated leniently.
Summary of Pleadings
First, The Government would like to ask the court that The Court decision has
exhausted all easing aspects of under-aged defendant in terms of Sandal thievery case. The
assumption that children are not as morally culpable as adults is false. Juveniles are seen as
mature. Because, they have the real thought about something, they can determined whether
their attitude is wrong r not. The Proportional retribution argues that the retribution taken
by society against an offender should be proportional to the harm he has caused the victim.
For example, a person who kills is more culpable than a person who robs or hurts. And the
children get the punishement that not extrem like punishement to adult. Furthermore,
Punishing children more leniently than adults will undermine the deterrent value of
punishment.
Second, The Government team would like to ask the court to decide that The
judgment has been, in any manner, fair compared to other similar case. The primary
purpose of a justice is the prevention of crime and the protection for people. All kinds of
People should be punished if theyre offenders. To achieve these purposes that under aged
Youth Crime, Jolanta Juszkiewicz
The Comparative Advantage of Juvenile versus Criminal Court Sanctions
"Jailing juveniles", by Steve Bogira, 1993

SMAN 1 Krian A
Widyah Angraeni Claudia Narinda Rahma Putri
case N-3-A on the matter of the Sandal thievery case by an under-aged citizen
defendant should not be entitled to lenient punishment. More over, in Indonesia, Supremacy
of Law is the guidance to live as a citizen. People must be punished proportionally when
they do criminal acts. Whether adult or child. Crime is always a crime, consequences are
always the same. All the people that do rimb accident must acept the conequency of their
acts.they must holding responsible their acts.therefore is just that the offender gets punished
properly, based not on age, but severity and harms of the crime. Victims and/or their
families do carry the consequences, It is more to achieve the upholding of Justice. So, its
going to give deterrent effect for people especially teenagers.

Youth Crime, Jolanta Juszkiewicz

The Comparative Advantage of Juvenile versus Criminal Court Sanctions
"Jailing juveniles", by Steve Bogira, 1993

SMAN 1 Krian A
Widyah Angraeni Claudia Narinda Rahma Putri
case N-3-A on the matter of the Sandal thievery case by an under-aged citizen
Sandal thievery case by an under aged citizen
The Government side would like to ask to the court to decide that,
1.

The court decision has not exhausted all easing aspects of an under aged defendant

2.

The judgment has not been, in any manner, fair compared to other similar case

Statement of Facts
The court has punished Mr. AAL as guilty. We are gonna ask to the court that This is
urgently not fair from the very first step. Under aged crime is different from adult crime in
that the offenders are. The best way to deal with them is not punishment like what the court
has decided. A wrong solution, just the fact that teenagers are committing more crimes,
then it can justify the policy to try them as adults. Putting them in a prison, and even worst
with adult offenders is likely to increase the chance of recalcitrance because they will be in
the same environment as other offenders who will be a negative influence on them.
Summary of Pleadings
First, The Government would like to ask the court that The court decision has not
exhausted all easing aspects of an under aged defendant. Juveniles should not be treated to
be fully conscious moral individually. By treating them as defendant in court. So, the best
way to deal with them is through rehabilitation rather than punishment When they are
offenders. Juveniles are more susceptible to reform and the rates of recalcitrance for child
offenders under counselling. Therefore, it is no surprise that Juveniles make choices that
are less responsible than those made by mature adults in similar situations. The deterrence
theory assumes that all crime is committed by a rational evaluation. Indeed, Juvenils are not
capable of making rational calculations and hars offend for people.Juveniles

are not

capable of making the same moral judgements as adults. That is why children are no
allowed to vote, drive or watch certain movies.
Second, We are going to ask the court that The judgment has not been, in any manner,
fair compared to other similar case. Adolescents are too emotionally

Youth Crime, Jolanta Juszkiewicz

The Comparative Advantage of Juvenile versus Criminal Court Sanctions
"Jailing juveniles", by Steve Bogira, 1993

SMAN 1 Krian A
Widyah Angraeni Claudia Narinda Rahma Putri
case N-3-A on the matter of the Sandal thievery case by an under-aged citizen
immature to be tried as adults. When Under Aged Offenders are treated as adults, it is
going to Harm their job prospects. "The main fruit of these laws seems to be the permanent
felony record given to the youths. A felony conviction and a sentence to probation
significantly harmed job prospects, with the effects lasting as much as a decade
later." "Jailing juveniles", by Steve Bogira, 1993
The only long term solution to juvenile crime is reform of the under aged citizen.
They are more susceptible to reform and the rates of recalcitrance for child offenders under
counselling in the US is significantly lower than that of adult offenders. Even if some end
up re-offending, it does mean that just under half of those who had been given the chance to
return to normal life took up that chance and did not re-offend. Putting them in a prison,
and even worst with adult offenders is likely to increase the chance of recalcitrance because
they will be in the same environment as other offenders who will be a negative influence on
them.

Youth Crime, Jolanta Juszkiewicz

The Comparative Advantage of Juvenile versus Criminal Court Sanctions
"Jailing juveniles", by Steve Bogira, 1993