Está en la página 1de 154

HowtoWriteGoodScientific

How
to Write Good Scientific
ProjectProposals:
AComprehensiveGuide
Rui PedroPaiva,PhD
Researcher@Proyecto Prometeo,Ecuador
Professor @ University of Coimbra, Portugal
Professor@UniversityofCoimbra,Portugal

January2013

Outline

Introduction
PreliminaryWork
Structure of a Project Proposal
StructureofaProjectProposal
AboutCollaborativeWriting
F th I f
FurtherInformation
ti
Submission
Notification
DisseminationofResults
2

Outline

ConclusionsandFutureWork
Conclusions
and Future Work
Acknowledgments
AbouttheAuthor
b
h
h
Bibliography

Introduction

MotivationandScope
ObjectivesandApproaches
MainContributions
Overview:Whatmakesagoodprojectproposal?

Note:thissectionhassomeoverlapwiththeintroductorysectionon[Paiva,2013]HowtoWrite
GoodScientificPapers:AComprehensiveGuide,forthesakeofcompletenessandtomakeit
sufficientlyselfcontained

Introduction
MotivationandScope
Motivation and Scope
Whatisascientificprojectproposal?
A
Arequestforfinancial
request for financial
assistance toimplementa
scientificproject (inspired
f
from[Belmain,2012])
[B l i 2012])

From http://www.cartoonstock.com/directory/r/research_funding.asp
5

Introduction
MotivationandScope
Motivation and Scope
Whywriteproposals?
Write proposals so that you have money to do research
and give your contribution to understanding the world
(Scientific career: should be centered in the creation of
knowledge)
Fundequipment andlaboratoryfacilities
Fundstudents ((bothunder orpostgraduate)
p
g
)
Givesyouindependencetoattendingmeetings
E.g.,collaborate withotherscientists,gotoconferences,
etc.
etc
6

Introduction
MotivationandScope
Motivation and Scope
Whywriteproposals?
Important indicator of external approval of your
activities
Raise your academic prestige

Increase the number of scientific publications


May benefit your evaluation
Grantgetters and people who publish more (always favoring
quality over quantity) are ranked higher

May benefit your university/research institution


financially through overheads
7

Introduction
Proposalwritingrequiresconsiderableknowledge
inmanydisciplines
y
p
Asanyskill,canbelearnedbutrequirespractice

Introduction
MotivationandScope
Motivation and Scope
What to investigate in a project?
A
Anewidea,e.g.,afirstsolutiontoanimpacting
new idea e g a first solution to an impacting
problem
Abettersolution toaknownproblem
E.g.,abetterperformingalgorithm(accuracy,speed,etc.)

Multidisciplinaryideas
Knowledgegaps
K
l d

Introduction
ObjectivesandApproaches
j
pp
Thepurposeofthisdocumentistosummarizea
numberofgeneralguidelines forproducing
competitive scientific project proposals
competitivescientificprojectproposals
Theseguidelinesdonotsubstitutethepricelessvalueof
experience
Asalways,thesearegeneralrulesofthumb
y,
ge e a u es o u b
Particularcasesmightrequireparticularapproaches

Iresorttobothaliteraturereview onthethemeand
my personal experience
mypersonalexperience
Otherpeoplemightdisagreewithsomeofmyperspectives

Illustrativeexamples areusedextensively
10

Introduction
MainContributions
Main Contributions
Aclear,comprehensiveandintegratedoverview
of the main issues pertainingtotheproductionof
ofthemainissues
pertaining to the production of
goodscientificprojectproposals
Informationaboutthetopicisscatteredacrossseveral
sources

Lessonslearned frommypersonalexperience
writingscientificproposals
Enrichedwithseveralrejectedproposals

11

Introduction
Overview:
Overview:Whatmakesagoodscientific
What makes a good scientific
projectproposal?
Anoriginal,impactingidea
g
, p
g
Demonstratingscientific,economic,andsocialimpact
oftheproposedresearch

Itsadequacytofundingagencyrequirements
It d
t f di
i
t
and programcriteria
Idea
Ideaisstrategicforthedonor
is strategic for the donor
Fundingmaybetargettospecificfields,e.g.,energy,or
profiles,e.g.,researchersundersomeage

12

Introduction
Overview:Whatmakesagoodscientificproject
g
p j
proposal?
Thewayyoucommunicate it
Effectiveness
Effectivenessofcommunicationandclarityofpresentation
of communication and clarity of presentation
arekey

Agoodcritical coverageofrelatedliterature
Aconvincingmethodology
A
i i
th d l
Convincingteambackground andabilitytosucceed
Theprojectcoordinatorandteamscurriculummust
convincetheevaluatorsthattheprojecthasahigh
probabilityofsuccess
E.g.,pastworkonrelatedtopics,preliminaryresearch

13

Introduction
Overview:Whatmakesagoodscientificproject
g
p j
proposal?
Adequatemanagement,monitoring andevaluationplans
Managementstructure,planneddeliverables,milestones,etc.
Management str ct re planned deli erables milestones etc

Realisticbudget
Demonstrateneedforfinancialassistance(resources:equipment,
studentscholarships,conferences,etc.)
d
h l hi
f
)

Exitstrategy:demonstrationofthe sustainabilityofthe
projectsoutputs
Whichprojectsoutputsshouldliveonaftertheprojectends,who
willwantthem,andwhy?
E.g.,softwarecommercializationplans,patents,newknowledge,better
trained people
trainedpeople
14

Introduction
O
Overview:Whatmakesagoodscientificproject
e e :
at a es a good sc e t c p oject
proposal?
Keyquestions (adaptedandextendedfrom[Cardoso,
2012]
Istheresearchnew?
Istheresearchsignificanttothefieldofresearch?
Is the research significant to the field of research?
Doesitclearlymotivateandclearlyformulatetheresearch
question?
Doesitoutlinethecurrentknowledgeoftheproblem
Does it outline the current knowledge of the problem
domain,aswellasthestateofexistingsolutions?
Doesitpresentclearlyanypreliminaryideas,theproposed
approach and the results achieved so far?
approachandtheresultsachievedsofar?
15

Introduction
Overview:Whatmakesagoodscientificproject
proposal?
Keyquestions (adaptedandextendedfrom[Cardoso,
2012]
Doesitsketchtheresearchmethodologythatwillbeapplied?
Doesitpointoutthecontributionsoftheapplicanttotheproblem
solution?
Doesitstateinwhataspectsthesuggestedsolutionwillbe
D
it t t i h t
t th
t d l ti
ill b
different,neworbetterascomparedtoexistingapproachestothe
problem?
p
Doesitstatehowtheexpectedresultswillbeevaluatedor
comparedtoexistingapproachestotheproblem?
Doesitstatehowandbywhomtheexpectedresultscanbe
applied?

16

Introduction
Overview:Whatmakesagoodscientificproject
proposal?
Keyquestions (adaptedandextendedfrom[Cardoso,
2012]
Istheteamsbackground(andparticularly,theproject
coordinators)adequatetoconvincetheevaluatorsthatthe
projectwillsucceed?
Doesitstatehowtheprojectevolutionwillbemonitoredand
Does it state how the project evolution will be monitored and
evaluated?
Isthebudgetrealistic?Istoolowortoohigh?Aretheplanned
equipment,scholarships,missions,consumables,etc.adequate?
Doesitdemonstratethesustainabilityoftheprojectsoutputs?
Whichprojectsoutputsshouldliveonaftertheprojectends,who
willwantthem,andwhy?

17

Introduction
Forbeginners:findarolemodel
Followthemodelofagoodscientificprojectproposal of
the kind you are writing in your research field
thekindyouarewriting,inyourresearchfield

Startwritingthedayyoudecidetostudytheproblem
g
yy
y
p
Evensimple,short,unstructurednoteswillhelpyou
Helpyoustayingfocused
Acceleratetheproductionofthefinalmanuscript
Accelerate the production of the final manuscript

Writedownideasthatcometoyourmind
Dontwaitforamonthbeforethedeadlinetostartwriting

18

Introduction
Thinkaboutpossiblefundingsourcesearly
Check proposal calls anddeadlines
Checkproposalcalls
and deadlines
Contactpossiblepartnersasearlyaspossible
Becomeaproposalreviewer
Itwillhelpyoutobothreadandwritebetter
It will help you to both read and write better
How?
Approachfundingsources
Getfunding!Theymayinviteyoulatertobecomeareviewer
Get funding! They may invite you later to become a reviewer
19

Introduction

From http://ec.europa.eu/research/evaluations/pdf/archive/fp7_monitoring_reports/fourth_fp7_monitoring_report.pdf
20

Introduction
Further reading
Furtherreading
A.Yavuz Oruc (2011).HandbookofScientificProposal
(
)
p
Writing,Chapman andHall/CRC

21

PreliminaryWork:
Preliminary
Work:
Whatyoushoulddo
beforewritingtheproposal

Goodresearchideas
Fundingsources
Partners

Callassessment
Basicdraft
Taskscheduling

PreliminaryWork
Goal
Planyourproposalbeforewritingit

How?
Haveanidea

Findaboutfunding
opportunities
ii

Assess
suitableness of
suitablenessof
researchcall

Contactprospective
partners

Writebasicdraft
andsharewith
partners

Scheduleand
assigntasksto
partners

Adapted from [Belmain, 2012]

23

PreliminaryWork AGoodIdea
Goal
Goodresearchidea
key for a good proposal
keyforagoodproposal
Althoughnotsufficient

Fromhttp://en.paperblog.com/threerulesto
p
p p
g
stresstestyourgreatidea351375/

24

PreliminaryWork AGoodIdea
Researchideasandscope
p
Pureresearch (=basicresearch=fundamental
research)
Increase
Increaseunderstandingoffundamentalprinciples:explain
understanding of fundamental principles: explain
howtheworldworks,refuteexistingtheories
Generateprinciplesandtheories
Typicallynotintendedtogeneratecommercialbenefitsinthe
yp
y
g
sortterm

Examples

Physics:findtheHibbs boson
E
Economy:explaintheworldeconomiccrisis
l i h
ld
i ii
Sociology:understandsocialchanges
Computerscience:analyzealgorithmcomplexity

25

PreliminaryWork AGoodIdea
Researchideasandscope
Research ideas and scope
Appliedresearch
Practicalapplicationofscience:useofaccumulated
knowledgetoaddresscomplexrealworldproblems,
withpossiblecommercialbenefits
Examples
Economy:usemachinelearningandeconomictheoriesto
predicteconomicbehavior
Computerscience:createnewprogramminglanguagessuited
Co pute sc e ce: c eate e p og a
g a guages su ted
forspecificgoalsandtasks
Business:applydataminingtoenterprisedatatodiscover
relationsamongcustomers,products,etc.
26

PreliminaryWork AGoodIdea
Researchideasandscope
Research ideas and scope
Hybridresearch
Usually,amixofthetwo
Usually a mix of the two
Examples
Computerscience:understandhowmusicsignalsencode
emotionsandusemachinelearningtechniquestobuild
emotionbasedretrievaltools
Medicine:understandthehumansenseoftouchandapply
cuttingedgeknowledgeaboutroboticsandcommunication
technologiestoperformtelesurgerywithusersensory
feedback

27

PreliminaryWork AGoodIdea
Whatmakesagoodresearchidea?
What makes a good research idea?
Originality
Theideashouldbe
The idea should be original
original
Relevantandpreviouslyunaddressedproblem
Bettermethodology toapreviouslyaddressedbutunsolved
t i (currentresultswithroomforimprovement)
topic
(
t
lt ith
f i
t)
Bettermethodology toaproblemwithknownsolution
E.g.,muchmoreefficient solution

28

PreliminaryWork AGoodIdea
Whatmakesagoodresearchidea?
What makes a good research idea?
Impact
The
Theideashouldhaveasignificantimpacttoscience
idea should have a significant impact to science
and/ortosociety
Scientific,social,economic,culturalimpact

Riskiness
Topicshouldbecomplex,withsomeassociatedriskand
ambition
biti

29

PreliminaryWork AGoodIdea
How?

FromBTexact Technologies
adivisionofBritish
Telecommunicationsplc
From http://archive.sciencewatch.com/dr/erf/2011/11decerf/
http://archive sciencewatch com/dr/erf/2011/11decerf/

30

PreliminaryWork AGoodIdea
How?
o ?
Yourownbackground,experienceandintuition
Openissuesfromyourpastprojectsandpapers,

Yourcolleagues (inyourinstitutionornetwork)
Collaborationisinspiring

Research
Researchagendasfromreferenceresearchlabs
agendas from reference research labs
Strategicresearchagendas (e.g.,Garnter,Forrester,
etc.)
Researchreportsfromsciencewatchdogs
E.g.,EssentialScienceIndicators(ThomsonReuters),Science
Watch
31

PreliminaryWork AGoodIdea
How?
Visionsbyleadingresearchers
Topicsinworldclassconferences
InventingtheFuturetypepapers
I
ti th F t t
Revisionsandtrends,knowledgegaps,etc.in

ConclusionsandFutureWorksectionsofrecent
goodpapers
Suggestionsforfuturework

Informationevents
Information events
Somefundingagenciesorganizeprogramsdedicatedtothe
exchangeofideas
E.g.,FP7InfoDay
32

PreliminaryWork AGoodIdea

Fromhttp://www.gartner.com/technology/research/maverick/

33

PreliminaryWork AGoodIdea
Structureyouridea
Structure your idea
Divideandconquer approach
Define
Definehierarchyoftasks
hierarchy of tasks andsubtaskstotacklethe
and subtasks to tackle the
problem
Usefultoidentifyareaswhereyouneedtolookfor
expertise somewhereelse(i.e.,findpartners)

34

PreliminaryWork AGoodIdea
Getoutofthebox!Exploreotherfields

Manygreatideasaremultidisciplinary
E h
Exchangeideaswith
id
i h colleaguesfromotherfields
ll
f
h fi ld
Readjournalsoutsideofyourusualthemes
Engineering:journalsandmagazineslikeIEEESpectrum
mightbeagoodsourceofinspiration

Askthequestion:Arethereanystudies
Ask
the question: Are there any studies thatalready
that already
answer thequestionyouareasking?
Oneofthepurposesoftheliteraturereview(seelater)

35

PreliminaryWork AGoodIdea
Remember,youneedtimetoreflect!!!
Besidesagoodidea,havepreliminaryresults

Mostsuccessfulproposals
Most
successful proposals arebasedonpreliminary
are based on preliminary
results(prospectiveexperiments,yourandyour
partnerspastwork,etc.)
Theystrengthen yourproposal:usefulfor
demonstratingfeasibilityandcapabilities

36

PreliminaryWork FundingSources

Thepurposeofscienceistogetpaidfordoingfun
stuff Nominally science involves discovering
stuff.Nominally,scienceinvolvesdiscovering
somethingnewabouttheUniverse,butthisisn't
reallynecessary.What is reallynecessaryisagrant.
[Schulman,1996]

37

PreliminaryWork FundingSources
Goal
Findoutaboutfundingopportunities (programs,
areas,fundingamounts,etc.)

How?
Lookinthetypicalsources

Governmentfundingagencies
Charitablefoundations
B i
Businesses
Individuals

38

PreliminaryWork FundingSources
How?
Haveadatabaseoffundingsources,programs
anddeadlines
Aboutgeneraltopics
Closetoyourresearchidea

Checktypicalfundingamount
Ch k t i l f di
t perproject
j t
Checkevaluationtime
Meantimebetweensubmissionandnotification
Mean time between submission and notification
Promptandhelpfulrevision?3months,1year?
Mightberelevantdependingonyourneeds

39

PreliminaryWork FundingSources
Examples
EuropeanUnionFrameworkPrograms17
InternationalFoundationforScience,Sweden
International Foundation for Science Sweden
ScienceFoundationsfromindividualcountries
E.g.,Portugal
E g Portugal

Governmentagencies:Fundao para aCincia eTecnologia


Governmentcooperationprograms:MITPortugal
Charitablefoundations:Fundao Calouste Gulbenkian
Business:PTInovao

IItisgoodwhenyourinstitutionhasadministrative
i
d h
i i i h
d i i
i
staff dedicatedtothistask.
40

PreliminaryWork FundingSources

From http://ec.europa.eu/research/fp7/understanding/fp7inbrief/structure_en.html

41

PreliminaryWork FundingSources

42

From http://ec.europa.eu/research/fp7/understanding/fp7inbrief/structure_en.html

PreliminaryWork FundingSources

IP
LargescaleIntegrationProject
l
i
j
Minimumof3partnersfrom
3differentcountries
3to5years
Budget:tensofM
B d
f M

STREP
SpecificTargetResearchProject
S ifi
h
j
Minimumof3partnersfrom
3differentcountries
2to3years
Budget:around2M
B d
d 2 M

Adapted from http://ec.europa.eu/research/fp7/understanding/fp7inbrief/fundingschemes_en.html

43

PreliminaryWork FundingSources

From www.efpconsulting.com/tools (Mr. M. Morrons FP7 Book)

44

PreliminaryWork FundingSources
TheGoodNews
The Good News
Investmentinscienceisgrowingglobally
Nearly
Nearlydoubledsincethebeginningofthe21
doubled since the beginning of the 21st century

From [Royal Society,


Society 2011,
2011 p.
p 16]

45

PreliminaryWork FundingSources

From [Royal Society, 2011,


p. 42]]
p

46

PreliminaryWork FundingSources
TheBadNews
The Bad News
Worldcrisis affectsresearchbudgetsinseveral
countries
Lowproposalacceptancerates
Manyfundingsourcesaround10
Many funding sources around 1015%
15%
orless,dependingonthetopic

47

PreliminaryWork CallAssessment
Goal
Gettoknowindetail thenatureoftheresearch
calls
Adonormighthaveseveralprograms,eachwithits
ownrules(e.g.,EuropeanCommissionFP7)

Evaluate whetheryourresearchideasfit
Selectonecall

48

PreliminaryWork CallAssessment
How?
Suitableness
Does
Doestheresearchcallmatchyourresearchideasand
the research call match your research ideas and
researchscope?
Ifnot,youcanbe
Reactive
Adaptyourideastofitanexistingprogram
Proactive
Proposeyourownideastoaprogram
Sometimesonlyinspecificmoments,e.g.,publiccallsfor
ideas
49

PreliminaryWork CallAssessment
How?
Eligibility
Areyoueligibletoapply?
Are you eligible to apply?
Age
Youngresearchers,experiencedresearchers
Theme
Startinggrants,excellencegrants,teamformationgrants,
grantstoreturntoyouroriginalcountry,

50

PreliminaryWork CallAssessment
How?
Deadline
Whatisthesubmissiondeadline?
What is the submission deadline?
Doyouhaveenoughtimetowriteawinningproposal?

Acceptancerate
Acceptance rate
Forprogramswithlowacceptancerate,howconfident
areyou?
Whattradeoffsaretherebetweenprovidedfunding
andacceptancerate?

51

PreliminaryWork CallAssessment
Read thecalldocumentindetail
Avoidrunningagainsttheclock
Many
Manypotentiallygoodproposalsfailbecauseof
potentially good proposals fail because of
insufficientpreparationtime:badwriting,deficient
stateoftheartreview,badplanning,notimetoreview,
etc.
t

52

PreliminaryWork CallAssessment

From http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/page/cooperation?callIdentifier=FP7ICT201310#wlp_call_FP7

PreliminaryWork Partners
Goal
Findresearchsynergies
Excellence demandscollaboration
Thewhole ismorethanthesumoftheparts

54

PreliminaryWork Partners
How?
Identifyexternalneeds
Basedonthepreviousstructuration
p
ofyourresearchidea
y

Contactprospectivepartners
Stateyourresearchidea andvisions
Clarifywhatcontributionsyourpartnerscangive
Oftenmorethanwhatyouexpectedinitially

Attendcollaborationevents
Attend collaboration events
Someprogramshaveeventsdedicatedtofindingpartners
fortheircalls
55

PreliminaryWork Partners
Haveadatabaseofpossiblepartners
Frompastprojectsorpapers,scientificcontacts,authors
youve
you
vereadabout,
read about

Have Industrypartners
yp
Dependingonthenatureofyourproject,theymightbekey
forlaterexploitationofprojectresults

Contactpeopleyouveneverworkedwithbefore
Itisusuallyrewarding
56

PreliminaryWork Partners
Usepartnersearchtools
E.g.,FP7CORDISpartnersearchtool

Formtheconsortiumearlierthenthecall
Atleastthecoreteam

Optimizetheconsortiumsize
Nottoolarge,nottoosmall
Dependsontheprojectsize
IP:around15
STREP:around5

57

PreliminaryWork Partners

From https://cordis.europa.eu/partners/web/guest/home

58

PreliminaryWork Partners
Collaborationisagrowingtrend
Collaboration is a growing trend

From [Glnzel and Schubert,2004]

59

PreliminaryWork Partners
Whycollaborate?
Toshareknowledge,experienceandskills
Promoteexcellence

Totakeadvantageofspecialization
To take advantage of specialization youdon
you dontthave
have
Delegatetasks

Tosustainmotivation viainteraction
Tohave/provideaccesstocostlyequipment,data,etc.
To have/provide access to costly equipment data etc
E.g.,clinicalpartner:costlyhospitalequipmentanddata,
enterprisepartner:costumerdata

Tostrengthenconnections
g
((andfosterfuturecollaboration
virtuouscircle)
Topromote increasednumberofpublications and
citations
60

PreliminaryWork Partners
Levelsofcollaboration
Levels of collaboration
Intrainstitutional
Amongresearchersinsidethesameresearchinstitution
Among researchers inside the same research institution
Why?
Closepartnership,dailydiscussions,seedofgoodideas
Typically,happensnaturally peoplewithsimilar
intereststendtogrouptogether
Accessto intrainstitutionalfundingg toexploitsynergies
p
y g
insidetheinstitution

Exchangeideaswithcolleaguesfarfromyourfield
g
g
y
Remembergoodideas areoftenmultidisciplinary
61

PreliminaryWork Partners
Anexampleofasmallcoauthorship
networkdepictingcollaborations
t
k d i ti
ll b ti
amongscientistsataprivateresearch
institution.
Nodesinthenetworkrepresent
scientists,andalinebetweentwoof
themindicatestheycoauthoreda
paper during the period of study This
paperduringtheperiodofstudy.This
particularnetworkappearstodivide
intoanumberofsubcommunities,as
indicatedbytheshapesofthenodes,
andthesesubcommunities correspond
roughlytotopicsofresearch.
From [Newman,
[Newman 2004]

62

PreliminaryWork Partners
Levelsofcollaboration
Levels of collaboration
National/Regional
Among
Amongresearchersfromdifferentresearchinstitutions
researchers from different research institutions
inthesamecountry/regionorneighborcountries
Why?
Accesstonational/regionalfundingtostimulatenational
networks,addressspecificcountry/regionneeds
Cultural,environmentalandgeographicproximity
g g p p
y
E.g.,IberoAmericannetworks,EuropeanUnionFP7,etc.

63

PreliminaryWork Partners
Levelsofcollaboration
International
Amongresearchersfromdiversecountries
Why?
Why?
AccesstoInternationalfundedprojects tostimulate
internationalnetworks
E.g.,IBSAinitiative(India,BrazilandSouthAfrica),European
U i FP7 (
UnionFP7(nonEUpartnersallowed,withspecific
EU
ll
d ih
ifi
conditions)
Highestpotential:theworldisthelimit
Highestlevelofavailablespecialization
g
p
Highestrewardpossibilities:numberofpapers,citations,
budget,,etc.)

Growingfaster thandomesticcollaborations
64

PreliminaryWork Partners
InMarch2010,PhysicsLetters
Bpublishedthemostmulti
authoredresearchpaperto
d
date,when3,222researchers
h
h
from32differentcountries
contributedtoastudyof
chargedparticlemultiplicities
g p
p
measuredwiththeATLAS
detectorattheLargeHadron
ColliderinGeneva

From [Royal Society, 2011, p. 46]

65

PreliminaryWork Partners

From [Royal Society, 2011, p. 59]


66

PreliminaryWork BasicDraft
Goal
Writeadraft(preliminaryversion)
Share itamongpartners
it among partners fordiscussion
for discussion

From http://www.ehow.com/how_7804861_writegrantproposalproject.html

67

PreliminaryWork BasicDraft
How?
Employthesametemplate usedforthefinal
submission
Titleandacronym,motivation,objectives,research
plan,managementstrategy,etc.
SeesectionStructureofaprojectproposal

Orwriteashort,say,3page,document
Discussitwithpartnersandnegotiatescopeand
goals
68

PreliminaryWork TaskScheduling
Goal
Scheduletasks
Definedeadlines
Define deadlines

Assigntasksto partners
Schedulepreparationmeetings
Schedule preparation meetings
Videoconference,facetoface(F2F),etc.

69

PreliminaryWork TaskScheduling
How?
o ?
Estimatetimeneeded foreachtask
Thetotaltimedependsonthe sizeandcomplexityofthe
proposal,numberofpartners,etc.
l
b
f
t
t
Fromseveralweeks toseveralmonths!

Defineandapplydeadlines

Deadlineforthemainwritingtasks
Deadlineforbudgetandjustification
DeadlineforshortCVs
Deadlineforfirstalmostreadyversion

Ganttchart withtasksuntilsubmission
70

PreliminaryWork TaskScheduling
How?
Assigntasks topartners,accordingtotheir
background specialization andthepreviousinitial
backgroundspecialization
and the previous initial
contact
Writingtasks(literaturereview,problemstoaddress,
objectives,proposedapproaches,activities),budget
andjustification,timeline,

71

PreliminaryWork TaskScheduling
Whowriteswhat?
Who writes what?
Administrativepart(administrativepartner)
Technicalpart
Contribution(eachpartner)
Beyondstateoftheartforeachchallenge
Workpackagecontent,includingWPtables
Work package content, including WP tables
Projectmanagementstructure(coordinator)
Impact(disseminationpartner)
Partnerdata(eachpartner)
Partnersprofiles
P t
fil
CVs
competencies
IndividualExploitation/Disseminationplan
p
p
Adapted from [TURBO, 2010]

72

PreliminaryWork TaskScheduling
Bearinminddelayshappen haveacushionof
time
Send reminders
Sendreminders
Plantohavean
Plan
to have an almostready
almostready version
version around2or
around 2 or
3weeksbeforethedeadline
Dependsonthesizeandcomplexityoftheproposal
p
p
y
p p
73

PreliminaryWork
Negotiation isveryimportbothinthepreparation
phaseandintheproposalwriting
Id
Ideasmayneedtobeadaptedaccordingtopartner
dt b d t d
di t
t
suggestion
Budgets mayhavetobenegotiated

Theprojectcoordinator playsakeyroleinguaranteeing
that all parts are satisfied andtheprojectkeeps
thatallpartsaresatisfied
and the project keeps
coherence
Positiveworkingatmosphereisessential
74

PreliminaryWork

Furtherreading
Main
A.Yavuz Oruc (2011).HandbookofScientificProposalWriting,
Chapman andHall/CRC
and Hall/CRC
Belmain S.(2012).Howtowriteascientificproposal:Respondingto
competitivecalls,Presentation,URL:
http://www.nri.org/projects/adappt/docs/McKnight/WritingGrantPropos
als.pdf
p

Additional
RoyalSociety(2011).Knowledge,NetworksandNations:Global
scientificcollaborationinthe21stcentury
TURBO(2010).
TURBO (2010) How
HowtostartasuccessfulproposalunderFP7?
to start a successful proposal under FP7?,
Presentation,TurkishResearchandBusinessOrganizations,URL:
http://www.turboppp.org/home.do;jsessionid=298565811203FFEA0
FB0326BE9D8598F?ot=5&rt=10&sid=0&pid=0&cid=9429

75

StructureofaProjectProposal

76

StructureofaProjectProposal
Goals
Goa s
Adequatelyorganizeyourproposal,promotingclarity
andobjectivity
Communicateexactly

Theproblemtobeaddressed
Whatyouwanttoaccomplish
Theresourcesrequired
Whentheactivitieswillbeperformed

Moreaboutthis
See[Paiva,2013](HowtoWriteGoodScientificPapers:A
ComprehensiveGuide
p
StructureofaScientificPaper)
p )
77

StructureofaProjectProposal
How?
Typicalstructure
Summary
Title,acronym
Title acronym
Projectsummary
Listofparticipants

DescriptionofWork
p

Problemstatement
Objectivesandjustification
Relevancetothecall
E l i
Evaluationplan
l
Progressbeyondthestateoftheart
Researchplan

78

StructureofaProjectProposal
How?
Typicalstructure
Outputs
Publications,patents,prototypes,tools,

Exitstrategy
Demonstrationofthesustainabilityoftheprojectsoutputs

Budget
Numbers,justificationofresources,valueformoney
Numbers justification of resources value for money

Projectmanagement,monitoringandevaluation
Managementstructure,etc.

Teambackground
Projects,publications,CVs

Disseminationplan
Channelsandtheactionstopubliclydisseminatetheprojectresults

79

Structure Title
Goals
Defineaprojectacronym andalonger(notlong!)
title
Anappealingprojectidentifier

How?
Shouldbriefandrigorouslysummarizethe
essenceoftheproject
Att
Attractive,objective,precise,fullydescriptive,concise
ti
bj ti
i f ll d
i ti
i
andcleartitle

Shouldbespecific
p
((nottoogeneral)
g
)
80

Structure Title

81

Structure ProjectSummary
Goals
Likethetitle,shouldbebrief andrigorously
summarize the essence of the project now with a
summarizetheessenceoftheproject,nowwitha
fewmorewords(typically,between200and400
words)
Likethetitle,maybetheonlythingevaluatorsread
Ifitisnotcatchy,theproposalmaybeexcludedwithout
further reading
furtherreading

82

Structure ProjectSummary
How?
Describeconcise,clearandobjectively:
What researchproblemtheconsortiumwilladdress
Blunt,righttothepointapproach
1or2sentences

Why itisimportant
1or2sentences

How theywilldoit
they will do it
3or4sentences

Themaincontributions thattheprojectwilloffer
3or4sentences

Theimportanceandimpact ofthecontributions
1or2sentences

Thenatureoftheconsortium

83

Structure ProjectSummary
EachyearCardiovascularDisease(CVD)causesover1.9milliondeathsintheEU,causingdirecthealthcostsof
105 billion. Coronary Heart Disease (CHD), half of all CVD deaths, is the single most cause of death in Europe.
105billion.CoronaryHeartDisease(CHD),halfofallCVDdeaths,isthesinglemostcauseofdeathinEurope.
HeartFailure(HF) aCHDbeingthemostfrequentcauseofhospitalizationforpeopleover65 has10million
patientsintheEU.
CurrenttreatmentofHFentailsrecommendationsfromcliniciansonmedication,dietandlifestyle.Patientsonly
receivefeedbackatdoctorsvisits,orwhenfacingsymptoms.Dailymonitoring,closefollowup,andhelpon
t t
treatmentroutineislacking.Nonadherencetothetreatmentregimeisamajorcauseofsuboptimalclinical
t
ti i l ki N
dh
t th t t
t
i
i
j
f b ti l li i l
benefit.
HeartCycle willprovideaclosedloopdiseasemanagementsolutiontoservebothHFandCHDpatients,including
hypertension,diabetesandarrhythmiasaspossiblecomorbidities.Thiswillbeachievedbymultiparametric
monitoringofvitalsigns,analysing
g
g ,
y g thedataandprovidingautomateddecisionsupport,toderivetherapy
p
g
pp ,
py
c
recommendations.
Thesystemwillcontainapatientloopinteractingdirectlywiththepatienttosupportthedailytreatment.Itwill
showthehealthdevelopment,includingtreatmentadherenceandeffectiveness.Beingmotivated,compliancewill
increase,andhealthwillimprove.Thesystemwillalsocontainaprofessionalloopinvolvingmedicalprofessionals,
e g alerting to revisit the care plan The patient loop is connected with hospital information systems to ensure
e.g.alertingtorevisitthecareplan.Thepatientloopisconnectedwithhospitalinformationsystems,toensure
optimalandpersonalised care.
Europeshealthsystemisundergoingradicalchangesduetoanagingpopulation.Itsmovingfromreactive
towardspreventativecare,andfromhospitalcaretocareathome.Tomorrowspatientswillbecomemore
empoweredtotaketheirhealthintotheirownhands.NewICTisrequiredtoenablethisparadigmshift.
HeartCycle,coordinatedbyPhilips leadinginelectronicsandhealthcare,includesexpertsontextiles,ICT,
decisionsupportanduserinteraction.
84

From HeartCycle project

Structure ListofParticipants
Goals
Listtheprojectpartners andtheiraffiliations

From HeartCycle project

85

Structure ProblemStatement
Goals
Describetheproblem youwilladdressinthe
proposal

How?
Righttothepoint
Right to the point
Synthesisdiagram

86

Structure ProblemStatement

From HeartCycle project

HeartCycle willprovideaclosedloopdisease
management solution being able to serve both HF
managementsolutionbeingabletoservebothHF
patientsandCHDpatients,includingpossibleco
morbiditieshypertension,diabetesandarrhythmias.
Thiswillbeachievedbymultiparametricmonitoring
andanalysisofvitalsignsandothermeasurements.
Ad
Adverseeventalarmswillbegeneratedforimmediate
l
ill b
df i
di
professionalattentionandanautomateddecision
supportsystemwillderivetherapyrecommendations
fromtheinformationacquired.Vitalbodysignswillbe
usedtotrackhealthstatusandtheimpactofthe
p
currenttreatment,showingthepatienttheimportance
ofadherencetothetreatment,motivatingimproved
treatmentadherence,andamoreactiveroleinhis
care.Theregularmeasurementofvitalsignswill
enable early diagnosis and warning of developing
enableearlydiagnosisandwarningofdeveloping
problems.Furthermore,itwillallowclosermonitoring
oftheeffectsofmedicationandlifestyle,makingmore
personalised treatmentplanspossible.Thefirstthree
yearsoftheprojectarededicatedtoresearchingand
realizingthetechnicalsystemsolution,whereasyear
fourispreservedfortheclinicalvalidationofthe
achievedresults.
87

Structure Objectives
Goals
Clearlystatetheobjectives oftheproposal,their
context andjustification
and justification
Scientific(moregeneric)
Technological(lowerlevel)
g
(
)

How?
Righttothepoint
Right to the point
Inaccordancewiththecalldocument
Usea
Use a list,diagram
list diagram
88

Structure Objectives

From HeartCycle project

89

Structure Objectives
How?
Justification
Why
Whyistheobjectiverelevanttothefield?
is the objective relevant to the field?
Whatapplicationsdothisresearchproblemhave?
Whatsthesocio,economic,cultural,etc.impactof
,
,
,
p
addressingthisproblem?
Use(inter)nationalstatisticalstudies,e.g.,OECD,WHO,
United Nations etc proveproblems,identifytrend
UnitedNations,etc.,
prove problems identify trend
SO1:ImproveDiseaseManagementinCardiovascularDisease
ThepopulationoftheEU,andindeedinthewesternworld,isaging.AccordingtoCharlieMcCreevy,
EuropeanCommissionerforInternalMarketandServices,overthecomingdecade,Europewill
p
,
g
,
p
changefromhavingfourpeopleofworkingageforeveryelderlycitizentoaratiooftwotoone[1]
[1]CharlieMcCreevy,ThefutureofEurope,toLimerickCityCouncil,24February,2006

From HeartCycle project

90

Structure RelevancetotheCall
Goal
Proveadequacyoftheproposaltothecall

How
Matching betweencallobjectives andproposal
objectives
E.g.,table

91

Structure RelevancetotheCall

From HeartCycle project

92

Structure EvaluationPlan
Goals
Describehowtheresultsoftheprojectwillbeevaluated

How
Validationofalgorithms
Efficiencyevaluation
Realworldvalidation
Realworld validation
Usabilitytests
Clinicalvalidation

Businessvalidation
Costbenefitanalysis

93

Structure ProgressbeyondSOTA
Goals
Summarizethecontributions theprojectwilloffer
toextendthestateoftheart

How?
Summarytable
Currentapproaches
Newapproachesresultingfromtheproject

Foreachobjective
h bj i
Literaturereview
Innovation
94

Structure ProgressbeyondSOTA

From HeartCycle project

95

Structure ProgressbeyondSOTA
TO2:EnableVitalBodySignSensing
ThistechnologicalobjectiveisaimedatenablingmeasurementsmedicallyrelevantfortheHeartCycle
applicationusingmethodsthatareeasytousebythetargetgroupofCVDpatients.
Thefollowingtechnologieswillbeinvestigated,andthosefoundtobemedicallyrelevantforthe
application,
andrealisable inaneasytouseway,willbeselectedforfurtherdevelopment.
ECG
StateoftheArt
Theelectrocardiogramisakeysignalfromwhichmanyheartparameterscanbeextracted.AgoodECG
requires gel sticky electrodes which are uncomfortable their placement requires medicalknowledge and
requiresgelstickyelectrodes,whichareuncomfortable,theirplacementrequiresmedicalknowledge
and
theymaycauseskinirritationonthelongterm.MyHeart proposedtextileswithembeddedelectrodes.
Despiteseveralprecautions,thedevelopedtechnologyturnedtobestillsensitivetomotionartefacts.
Innovation
The motion artefacts originatefromthereorganisation
Themotionartefacts
originate from the reorganisation ofthechargesattheinterfacejunctionofthe
of the charges at the interface junction of the
electrodewiththeelectrolyte.ItisproposedinHeartCycle toenhancetheECGsignalnotonlybymeans
ofsignalprocessingontheECGsignal,butalsobytakingintoaccountadditionalinformationprovidedby
othersensors,suchasaccelerometerlocatedontheelectrodeand/ordirectmeasurementofcontact
impedance.Thisrequiresdevelopingspecificelectronicsatthelocationoftheelectrode.Theelectrodes
becomesmartsensorsthatcansenseextrainformationfromtheiruseconditionssoastodeliverafully
correctedanddenoisedsignal.Ifdemonstratedaseffective,suchsmartelectrodeswouldmakea
significantstepforwardinthetextiledryelectrodetechnology.

From HeartCycle project

96

Structure ResearchPlan
Goal
Describeinthedetailtheproposedwork and
methodologies

How?
Divideandconquer approach
Organizeactivitiesaccordingtoworkpackages,tasks,sub
tasks
Particularlyimportantinlarge,multidisciplinaryprojects

Describeproposedmethodologiesindetail
Describerisks andcontingencyplans
Definetheprojecttimeline
Ganttchart
Gantt chart
97

Structure ResearchPlan
How?
Foreachactivitydescribe
Partner
Partnerinvolvement,objectives,tasks,outputs,
involvement objectives tasks outputs
milestones,deliverables,timeline,laborinput

Relateactivities
Describerisks andcontingencyplans
Provefeasibility
o e eas b ty o
ofworkplan
o pa
Adequatehumanresources,preliminaryresults,
equipment(availableandrequired),etc.

Longestandmostimportantpartoftheproposal
98

Structure ResearchPlan

From HeartCycle project

99

Structure ResearchPlan
WP1 ApplicationConceptDesignandBusinessDevelopment
WP1
Application Concept Design and Business Development
WP1definesandmanagesthetwotargetapplications,heartfailureandcoronaryheartdiseaseand
guaranteesthatallapplicationaspectsarebasedonclinicalexcellenceandthemedicalexpertknowledge.
WP6 Validation
ThisWorkPackageaimstoprovetheeffectivenessofthesolutionofferedbyHeartCycle
g
p
y
y inimproving
p
g
theadherenceofpatientstolifestyleandmedicationrecommendationsandthebenefitthattheimproved
adherencehasonthecourseofthedisease,exemplarilyforCHFand/orCHD.
WP7 KnowledgeManagement
WP7willaccountforthemanagementofallknowledgerelatedtotheprojectinallaspects,including
providingvisibilityoftheprojecttothepublic.
WP8 ProjectManagement
TheWPonProjectManagementdealswiththecoordinationandmanagementoftheprojectandthe
consortiumasawholeinallaspectsandcomprisestheimplementationofthemanagementprocesses.
WP9 Socioeconomicmonitoringandconcertation activities
WP9willsupportthebusinessdevelopmentprocessthroughanalysesoftheclinicalandorganisational
outcomesfromaneconomicperspective,i.e.assessmentofthesocioeconomicimpactofthe
applicationtoindividualstakeholdersandtosocietyatlarge.WP9willbecloselyrelatedtoWP1and
WP6

From HeartCycle project

100

Structure ResearchPlan

From HeartCycle project


101

Structure ResearchPlan

From HeartCycle project

102

Structure ResearchPlan

From HeartCycle project

103

Structure ResearchPlan

From HeartCycle project

104

Structure ResearchPlan

From HeartCycle
y p
project
j

105

Structure Outputs
Goal
Listconcreteresults oftheactivity

How?
Listplannedscientificpublications,databases,
reports tools,prototypes,patents,
reports,
tools prototypes patents
methodologies,organizedmeetings,workshops,
conferences

106

Structure Outputs

From HeartCycle project

107

Structure ExitStrategy
Goal
Demonstratethesustainabilityoftheprojectsoutputs
Showyouhaveplannedwhathappenswhentheprojectfinishes

How?
H ?
Describewhatconcreteresultswilllast aftertheproject
ends

Betterfacilitiesandequipment?
Bettertrained,morecapablestaff?
Better/newtechnology,knowledge?
/
gy,
g
Changesinthecommonpracticesinthefield?
Scientificnetwork?

Describecommercializationplans
Describe commercialization plans
108

Structure ExitStrategy
Theuniversitypartnershavecommonexploitationgoalsintheareasofscientific
The
university partners have common exploitation goals in the areas of scientific
knowledgedissemination.
Inparticular,thisincludes:
theproductionofnewmeasurableknowledgeevidencedaspublicationsinhigh
impact peer review journals in the general area of biomedical technology
impactpeerreviewjournalsinthegeneralareaofbiomedicaltechnology,
cardiovascularphysiologyandclinicalcardiology
thecreationofnewreferenceknowledge/informationentitiesonHFandCHDinthe
formofwwwapplications,annotateddatabases,andtutorialsaimedatresearchers,
medical personnel and citizens
medicalpersonnelandcitizens
internationalnetworkingthroughthecollaborationwiththehighlevelpartnershipof
theprojectwiththeaimtosetupmaintainableEuropeanstructuressuchasfor
examplecentres ofexcellenceintheareaofpHealth andcardiology.
connectingwithleadingEuropeanclinicalandmedicalinstitutionsinthespecificfields
connecting with leading European clinical and medical institutions in the specific fields
ofcardiology,cardiovascularrehabilitation,clinicalmedicine,sleepandstress

From HeartCycle
y p
project
j
109

Structure Budget
Onceyougetthegrant,youruniversity,company,or
g
governmentagencywillimmediatelytake30to70%
g y
y
ofitsothattheycanheatthebuilding,payfor
Internetconnections,andpurchaselargeyachts.
[Schulman,1996]

110

Structure Budget
Goal
Planallcosts andjustifytheneedforfunding

How?
Defineneedofhumanresources
Scholarships,number,salarypermonth

Missions
ss o s
Conferences,meetings,visitstolabs

Equipment
Computers,experimentationmaterials,
Computers experimentation materials

Stationery
Institutionoverhead
111

Structure Budget
Fundingsourcesdonotgive100% oftherequiredfunding!
From50%to95%
creativeaccountingisoftenacommonpractice

Checkwhatyoucaninclude
y
Overheadscanbelimitedtolessthanwhatyourinstitution
charges
Existingstaffsalarycomplementsmaybelimitedorinexistent
g
y
p
y
Equipmentpurchasesmaybelimitedtoacertainamountand
kind

Budgetmustberealistic
g
Andshoulddemonstrateneedforfinancialassistance

112

Structure ProjectManagement
Goal
Describeprojectmanagement,monitoringand
evaluation mechanisms
Howprojectcosts,quality,schedule,andscopewillbe
monitored,controlled,andcorrectedifnecessary?

113

Structure ProjectManagement
How?
Definethemanagementstructure
Definecommunicationmechanisms
Define communication mechanisms
F2Fmeetings,telcos,videoconference
Workpackage,wholeproject,etc.
p
g ,
p j ,

Planaccountingreports
Progressmonitoring
og ess o to g
Reports,milestones,etc.

Definemeasurablegoals
g
114

Structure ProjectManagement
Accounting
Recordingoffinancialinformation
Veryimportanttofundingagencies
Mustbetransparentandaccurate

Qualitycontrolandevaluation
Specifyprojectdeliverables,milestones,etc.asameans
to evaluate the project stays on track
toevaluatetheprojectstaysontrack
Quarterly,biannualorannualreports

Milestones
Significantevents
Significant events (checkpoints)
(check points)
Typicallydecision/evaluationpointsintheprocess:completionofcertain
phasesoftheproject,evaluationofprojectprogress
Shouldbesignificant andattainable

115

Structure ProjectManagement
TheGeneralAssembly(GA)isthebodyconsistingofrepresentativesofallbeneficiaries,withthetask
The
General Assembly (GA) is the body consisting of representatives of all beneficiaries, with the task
tosupervisetheprojectandwillbechairedbytheProjectCoordinator.
TheProjectCoordinator isresponsibleforthemanagementoftheentireproject.TheCoordinatorof
theprojectistheofficiallinkbetweentheconsortiumandtheEuropeanCommission.TheCoordinator
h
hasappointedaProjectManagerandhasinstalledaProjectOffice,whichtogetherruntheproject
i d P j M
dh i
ll d P j Offi
hi h
h
h
j
HeartCycle.
TheProjectManagerdealswiththeoverallscientificandtechnologicalmanagementoftheproject.
TheProjectManagerwillsupervisetheWorkPackageLeadersandmakessurethatcommunication
j
g
p
g
betweenthevariousWPsproceedsassmoothlyaspossibleforasuccessfulintegrationofthevarious
componentsoftheProject.
TheProjectOfficewillingeneralbeinvolvedinnontechnicalmattersrelatedtoprojectmanagement,
i e all managerial organisational administrative and financial matters of the project
i.e.allmanagerial,organisational,administrativeandfinancialmattersoftheproject.
AWorkPackageLeader(WPL)willcoordinatetheworkcarriedoutinaspecificWorkPackageand
isresponsiblefortheplanning,monitoringandtechnicalreportingoftheprogressintheWP.

From HeartCycle project

116

Structure Partners
Goal
Demonstratetheconsortiumsqualityandability to
conducttheproposedresearchplan

How?
PresenttheshortCV ofallpartners
Significantprojects,publications, awards
Inthelightoftheproject,tohelpdemonstratethefeasibilityof
theworkplan

TheprincipalinvestigatorsCVis particularlysignificant

Describetheprofile
D
ib th
fil ofeachinstitution
f
h i tit ti
Howtheirmissionandvision fitthecall
Theirreputation iscrucial
117

Structure Partners
TheUniversityofCoimbra,Portugal,foundedintheyear1290compriseseightFaculties,more
The
University of Coimbra Portugal founded in the year 1290 comprises eight Faculties more
than2000teachersand22000students.Theparticipationintheproposedprojectiscarriedout
throughtheAdaptiveComputationGroupoftheDepartmentofInformaticsEngineering(DEI),
whichisoneofthe14departmentsoftheFacultyofSciencesandTechnology(FCTUC)and
integratesoneofits42researchunits.FCTUCoffersalargearrayofdifferentundergraduate
andpostgraduatedegrees(MScandPhD)inEngineering,LifeSciences,ExactSciences,
ArchitectureandAnthropology.TheDepartmentofInformaticsEngineeringoftheFCTUC
comprisesmorethan100researchers,ofwhich40holdPh.D.degrees.InsideDEI,thegroup
involvedinthecurrentprojectistheAdaptiveComputationGroup(ACG).Themaincore
expertiseoftheAdaptiveComputationGroupconcernsR&Dforintelligentdataanalysis,
f h d
f
ll
d
l
modelling andcomplexsystemsintegratingdatadrivenaswellasknowledgedrivenapproaches.
Thegrouphasavastexperienceinfundamentalandappliedresearchononlinesystem
identificationandcontrol,nonlinearmodelling andprediction,biosignal processing,image
processing pattern recognition and Medical Informatics In the last few years the group has
processing,patternrecognitionandMedicalInformatics.Inthelastfewyearsthegrouphas
publishedmorethan
200papersininternationalconferencesandmagazines,andhasbeeninvolvedinseveralR&D
projectsatnationalandEuropeanlevels,suchasMyHeart (IST2002507816),COSYControlof
ComplexSystem,Eunite
Co
p e Syste , u te EUropean
U opea NetworkonIntelligentTechnologiesforSmartAdaptive
et o o
te ge t ec o og es o S a t dapt e
Systems.

From HeartCycle project

118

Structure Partners
Provethatpartnersareperfecttoaccomplishthe
defined tasks
definedtasks
Expertise,background,reputation

Provetheneedforcollaboration
E.g.,complex,multidisciplinarywork
g , co p e , u t d sc p a y o
Lackofinhouseexpertise

119

Structure DisseminationPlan
Goal
Channelsandtheactionstopubliclydisseminatethe
projectresults

How?
Projectidentity
Forallpubliccommunication

Internet
Projecthomepage

Scientificpublicationsandevents
Pressreleases
P
l
Attainedresults

Demoinstallations
120

Structure DisseminationPlan

121

StructureofaProjectProposal

Furtherreading
Main
A.Yavuz Oruc (2011).HandbookofScientificProposalWriting,
Chapman andHall/CRC
and Hall/CRC
FP7(2012).TemplateforDescriptionofWork,MicrosoftWord
document

Additional
B
Belmain
l i S.(2012).Howtowriteascientificproposal:Respondingto
S (2012) H t
it
i tifi
l R
di t
competitivecalls,Presentation,URL:
http://www.nri.org/projects/adappt/docs/McKnight/WritingGrantPr
oposals.pdf
TURBO(2010).
TURBO (2010) How
HowtostartasuccessfulproposalunderFP7?
to start a successful proposal under FP7?,
Presentation,TurkishResearchandBusinessOrganizations,URL:
http://www.turboppp.org/home.do;jsessionid=298565811203FFEA0
FB0326BE9D8598F?ot=5&rt=10&sid=0&pid=0&cid=9429

122

AboutCollaborativeWriting

AboutCollaborativeWriting
Yourproposalwillbemoreappealingifyouallow
each partner to freely express his/her creativity
eachpartnertofreelyexpresshis/hercreativity.

124

AboutCollaborativeWriting
Goal
Promoteuniform andconsistent writingstyle
Guaranteesufficient and balanceddepth

How?
H ?
Agreeonterminologyand style
Make sure all partners follow the proposalsstemplate
Makesureallpartnersfollowtheproposal
template
Eliminateredundancies
Makesuretheproposaldoesntdivergetoadifferent
di ti th th
directionthantheoneagreed
d
Makesuredifferenttaskshaveadequate(maybe
balanced)depth

125

AboutCollaborativeWriting
Projectcoordinator warrantofqualityin
collaborativewritingg
Responsibleforresolvingallthementionedissues

126

AboutCollaborativeWriting

Further reading
Furtherreading
LowryP.B.,CurtisA.andLowryM.R.(2004).Building
y
,
y
(
)
g
aTaxonomyandNomenclatureofCollaborativeWriting
toImproveInterdisciplinaryResearchandPractice,
Journal of Business Communication Vol 41 No 1 pp
JournalofBusinessCommunication,Vol.41,No.1,pp
6699.

127

Submission

Submission
Ifyoucantsubmitontime,theresponsibleis
obviously the system
obviouslythesystem
Thesubmissionsitecantevenhandleafew
thousandsofsimultaneoussubmissions!Whatapoor
scalability!
Yourelectricitycompanyalwaysfailswhenyoumost
need it
needit
YourharddiskMeanTimeBetweenFailuredecidedto
proveitisanurbanmyth
129

Submission
Goal
Prepareyoursubmissioninadvance
Submit yourproposalontime
your proposal on time
Dontoverlookthistask!
Often,itisnotassimpleasitseems

130

Submission
How?
Collect allneededinformationinadvance
Dataaboutpartnersinstitutions,etc.
Data about partners institutions etc
PIC:ParticipantInformationCode
CVs

Sometimes,itisnecessarytomanuallycopy from
yourdocumenttoonlineformfields
Surprisesmayhappen
Youhavetoomanycharactersinaspecificfield
Formfielddoesntacceptedquotationmarks
F
fi ld d
t
t d
t ti
k
131

Submission
How?
Dontwait untilthelastminute!
Noteventhelastday
Not even the last day
Rememberhumannature
Submissionpeaksbythedeadline

Submissiondatesandtimes areusuallystrict
y
Ifthesystemscloses,itdoesntmatterifyou
misseditforjustoneminute
j
132

Submission

Fromhttp://alfa.fct.mctes.pt/images/LacragensProjectos.png
133
IllustrationofdailysealedsubmissionsinacallbytheScienceandTechnologyFoundation(FCT,Portugal).

Notification

Notification
Goals
Toinformtheauthorsaboutthedecision resulting
fromtheproposalreview process
Acceptance
Rejection

How?
H ?
Externalreviewerssendtheircomments about
the paper
thepaper
Fundingagencysendsthedecision accordingto
the reviews
thereviews
135

Notification
Notificationresults
Notification results
Acceptance
Theproposalisaccepted
However,maybenotasyouproposed
Budgetmay(isoften)cutabit
Humanresources,equipment,numberofmissionsmaybecut
Human resources equipment number of missions may be cut
abit

Inaddition,reviewersmayaddsuggestions
Literaturereferences,problemstoaddress
Literature references problems to address

Rejection
Theproposalisrejected
p p
j
136

Notification
RecommendedforFunding
R
d d f F di
OverallRating: Outstanding
Comments:
ThisisawellmotivatedproposalinvolvingimportantinnovationineHealth.
Thi i hi hl t d t
Thisisahighlyratedteamwithstrongpapersinrelevantareas.
ith t
i
l
t
[]

RecommendedforFunding
OverallRating: 86
Comments:
Overallitisaninterestingproposal.
ThePanelwouldrecommendtolookatthefollowingpapers:
[]
OnePhDstudentsufficestoconducttheproposedwork.Thusthebudgethasbeenreduced.

137

Notification
NotRecommendedforFunding
N
tR
d d f F di
Infaceofhighcompetitionforfunding,thisproposaldidnotreachapositiontobefunded.
OverallRating: Good
OverallComments: Themainvalueoftheprojectisthatithassomepracticalimplications.The
weaknessisperhapsthatitdoesnotofferanythingsignificantlynew.
eakness is perhaps that it does not offer an thing significantl ne
Comments:
Theproposallacksdetailabouthow[]aregoingtobeimplementedandhowthedifferent.
OnlyParticipantX hasastrongbackground.Theteamlackscommonpublicationsinthepast.
The expected publications are too few Only # journals from # researchers in 2 years are quite few
Theexpectedpublicationsaretoofew.Only#journalsfrom#researchersin2yearsarequitefew.

OverallRating:Excellent
Overall
Rating: Excellent
OverallComments:Strengths:Theteamhashighqualityresearchresults,thenoveltyofthetheme
oftheproposal,themultidisciplinarypointofview
Weakness:Thereisnocleardefinitionofthedevelopment,theproposaldoesnotclarifythe
improvements in the research field
improvementsintheresearchfield

138

Notification
Typicalrejectioncauses
Irrelevanttopic
Worknotsufficientlyoriginalorwithinsufficientsocial,
economic,scientificimpact
,
p
Lowacceptancerate
Themedoesntfitthefundingprogram
Proposedmethodologyisnotconvincing
Proposed methodology is not convincing
Lackofdetail,onlylistofgeneralideas

Unconvincingoutput
Does
Doesnotsignificantlyadvancethestateoftheart
not significantly advance the state of the art
Unrealisticnumberofpublications,lackofrelevanceofselected
publications,etc.

Shallow,uncriticalliteraturereview
Shallow uncritical literature review
139

Notification
Typicalrejectioncauses
Unconvincingcollaborationstrategy
Inadequateteambackground
Lackofpastrelatedpublications,weakteammembers

Failuretoproveneedforcollaboration
E.g.,youhaveallneedskillsinhouse

Inadequatemanagement,monitoringandevaluationplans
Unrealisticbudget
Eithertohighortoolow

Lackordeficientdemonstrationofthesustainabilityofthe
projectsoutputs
j
Unclearmarket,poorcommercializationplans

Badwritingqualityandpresentation
140

Notification
Nowit'stimefortheactualresearch.Youwill
quickly find out that (a) your project is not as simple
quicklyfindoutthat(a)yourprojectisnotassimple
asyouthoughtitwouldbeand(b)youcan'tactually
solvetheproblem.However andthisisvery
important youmustpublishanyway.[Schulman,
1996]

141

FurtherInformation

FurtherInformation
Furtherinformationon
Further information on
Structure
WritingSequence
Writing Sequence
WritingStyle
Reviewingyourdocument
R i i
d
t
SSee[Paiva,2013](HowtoWriteGoodScientific
[P i 2013] (H
W i G d S i ifi
Papers:AComprehensiveGuide)
143

ConclusionsandFutureWork

ConclusionsandFutureWork
Conclusions
Thisdocumentsummarizedanumberofgeneral
guidelines forproducinggoodscientificproject
for producing good scientific project
proposals
Theseguidelinesaregeneralrulesofthumb basedon
literaturereview onthethemeandmypersonal
experience

145

ConclusionsandFutureWork
FutureWork
Future Work
Improvements tothecurrentdocument
Howtoevaluatescientificpapers
How to evaluate scientific papers
Howtoevaluatescientificproposals

146

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgements
Proyecto Prometeo,Ecuador

EEscuela
l Politcnica
P lit i Nacional,
N i
l
Quito,Ecuador
Universidade deCoimbra,Portugal
148

AbouttheAuthor

AbouttheAuthor
Moreinfoathttp://rppaiva.dei.uc.pt/
More info at http://rppaiva dei uc pt/

150

Bibliography

Bibliography
Main
Yavuz Oruc (2011).HandbookofScientificProposal
Writing,Chapman andHall/CRC
FP7(2012).TemplateforDescriptionofWork,
Mi
MicrosoftWorddocument
ft W d d
t

152

Bibliography

Additional
BartleP.(2007).ProposalsforFunding:Howtogetmoneyoutofdonororganizations.Technical
Bartle
P (2007) Proposals for F nding Ho to get mone o t of donor organi ations Technical
Report,URL:http://cec.vcn.bc.ca/cmp/modules/resprp.htm
Belmain S.(2012).Howtowriteascientificproposal:Respondingtocompetitivecalls,
Presentation,URL:
h //
http://www.nri.org/projects/adappt/docs/McKnight/WritingGrantProposals.pdf
i
/ j
/ d
/d /M K i h /W i i G
P
l df
CardosoJ.(2012).Thepointsyourpapershouldaddress,TechnicalNotes,URL:
http://http://eden.dei.uc.pt/~jcardoso/ForStudents/students.html
Glnzel W.andSchubertA.(2004).AnalyzingScientificNetworksthroughCoauthorship.In
HandbookofQuantitativeScienceandTechnologyResearch,H.F.Moed etal.(eds.),257276.
JonesS.P.andBundyA.(2006).Writingagoodgrantproposal,TechnicalReport,URL:
http://research microsof t.com/enus/um/people/simonpj/papers/Proposal.html
http://research.microsof
t com/en us/um/people/simonpj/papers/Proposal html
LowryP.B.,CurtisA.andLowryM.R.(2004).BuildingaTaxonomyandNomenclatureof
CollaborativeWritingtoImproveInterdisciplinaryResearchandPractice,JournalofBusiness
Communication,Vol.41,No.1,pp6699.

153

Bibliography

Additional
NewmanM.(2004).Coauthorship
Ne
man M (2004) Coa thorship networksandpatternsofscientificcollaboration,Proceedings
net orks and patterns of scientific collaboration Proceedings
oftheNationalAcademyofSciencesoftheUnitedStatesofAmerica,Vol.101,pp.52005205
Paiva R.P.(2013).HowtoWriteGoodScientificPapers:AComprehensiveGuide,Tutorial:
http://rppaiva.dei.uc.pt/publications/Tutorials/goodPapers.pdf
RollHansen N.(2009).Whythedistinctionbetweenbasic(theoretical)andapplied(practical)
researchisimportantinthepoliticsofscience,Technical Report
Royal Society (2011) Knowledge
RoyalSociety(2011).
Knowledge,NetworksandNations:Globalscientificcollaborationinthe
Networks and Nations: Global scientific collaboration in the
21stcentury
SchulmanE.R.(1996).HowtoWriteaScientificPaper,AnnalsofImprobableResearch, Vol.2,
No.5,pg.8,URL:http://members.verizon.net/~vze3fs8i/air/airpaper.html
TURBO(2010).HowtostartasuccessfulproposalunderFP7?,Presentation,TurkishResearch
andBusinessOrganizations,URL:
http://www.turboppp.org/home.do;jsessionid=298565811203FFEA0FB0326BE9D8598F?ot=5&rt=
10&sid=0&pid=0&cid=9429

154

También podría gustarte