Subestation Fire Protection Ep 99-00-00 08 SP

EP 99 00 00 08 SP
SUBSTATIONS FIRE PROTECTION

AND DETECTION STANDARD
Version 2.0
Issued May 2010
Owner:
Chief Engineer Electrical
Approved
by:
Wilfred Leung
Chief Engineer
Electrical
Authorised
by:
Wilfred Leung
Chief Engineer
Electrical
Engineering Standard
Engineering Standard
Electrical
Disclaimer
This document was prepared for use on the RailCorp Network only.
RailCorp makes no warranties, express or implied, that compliance with the contents of this document shall be
sufficient to ensure safe systems or work or operation. It is the document users sole responsibility to ensure that the
copy of the document it is viewing is the current version of the document as in use by RailCorp.
RailCorp accepts no liability whatsoever in relation to the use of this document by any party, and RailCorp excludes
any liability which arises in any manner by the use of this document.
Copyright
The information in this document is protected by Copyright and no part of this document may be reproduced,
altered, stored or transmitted by any person without the prior consent of RailCorp.
UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED
Page 1 of 32
RailCorp Engineering Standard Electrical

Substations Fire Protection and Detection Standard
EP 99 00 00 08 SP
Document control
Version
2.0
RailCorp
Issued May 2010
Date
August 2007
May 2010
Summary of change
Last Technical Review
Application of TMA 400 format
Page 2 of 32
Version 2.0

EP 99 00 00 08 SP
Contents
1
Introduction .............................................................................................................................5
Scope and Application ...........................................................................................................5

2.1
Scope.........................................................................................................................5
References...............................................................................................................................5
3.1
Code of Practice ........................................................................................................5
3.2
International Standards..............................................................................................5
3.3
Australian Standards .................................................................................................5
3.4
Other References ......................................................................................................6
Definitions and Abbreviations ...............................................................................................6
Fire Risks and Risk Assessment...........................................................................................6

5.1
Particular Fire Risks to Substations...........................................................................6
5.2
The Fire Risk Evaluation Model.................................................................................7
5.3
Fire Risk Rating of substations ..................................................................................7
5.3.1
Process ......................................................................................................8
5.3.2
Risk Results Review...................................................................................8
5.4
Full Fire Audit.............................................................................................................9
Fire Protection Measures .......................................................................................................9

6.1
General ......................................................................................................................9
6.2
Personnel Safety .......................................................................................................9
6.3
Passive fire protection measures ..............................................................................9
6.3.1
Application..................................................................................................9
6.3.2
Separation ..................................................................................................9
6.3.3
Fire Sealing of Openings..........................................................................10
6.3.3.1 New Substations .......................................................................10
6.3.4
Fire retardant coverings ...........................................................................11
6.4
Active Fire Suppression Systems............................................................................11
6.4.1
General.....................................................................................................11
6.4.2
Active Fire Suppression Options..............................................................11
6.4.3
Active Fire Protection System Selection Matrix .......................................11
6.4.4
Fixed Automatic Aqueous Fire Fighting Systems (Automatic
Fire Sprinkler Systems) ............................................................................14
6.4.4.1 Application ................................................................................14
6.4.4.2 System ......................................................................................14
6.4.4.3 Water Supply for Fire Sprinkler Systems..................................14
6.4.4.4 Water Sprinkler Systems Activation..........................................15
6.4.5
Fire Hydrants Systems .............................................................................15
6.4.5.1 Application ................................................................................15
6.4.5.2 Street Fire Hydrants..................................................................15
6.4.5.3 On Site Fire Hydrant System ....................................................15
6.4.5.4 Water Supply to On Site Fire Hydrant Systems .......................15
6.4.5.5 Hose Reels ...............................................................................15
6.4.6
Gaseous Fire Suppression Systems........................................................16
6.4.6.1 Gaseous Fire Suppression System Activation and
Release.....................................................................................16
RailCorp
Issued May 2010
Page 3 of 32
Version 2.0

6.4.7
6.4.8
EP 99 00 00 08 SP
6.4.6.2 Safety Precautions for Total Flooding Systems........................16

6.4.6.3 Area Ventilation After Discharge of Carbon Dioxide.................17
Handheld Extinguishers ...........................................................................17
Foam Suppressants .................................................................................17
6.4.8.1 Application ................................................................................17
6.4.8.2 System ......................................................................................18
Fire Detection and Alarm Systems......................................................................................18

7.1
Application ...............................................................................................................18
7.1.1
Aspirating Smoke Detection Systems ......................................................18
7.1.1.1 Detectors...................................................................................19
7.1.1.2 Monitoring .................................................................................19
Fire Services Systems Maintenance ...................................................................................19

8.1
General ....................................................................................................................19
Appendix A
Fire Risk Evaluation Model Manual and Guidelines .......................................20
Fire Risk Evaluation Model - Manual ......................................................................................20
Process and Inputs .................................................................................................................20
Outputs 21
Numerical Trigger Points.........................................................................................................22
Definition of Risk Levels..........................................................................................................23
Limitations of Fire Risk Evaluation Model ...............................................................................24
Fire Risk Evaluation Model - Guidelines .................................................................................24
RailCorp
Issued May 2010
Page 4 of 32
Version 2.0

EP 99 00 00 08 SP
Introduction
This document describes the minimum mandatory design requirements and practices for
fire protection and detection systems in new substations and assessment of fire risks of
existing substations in RailCorp.
Scope and Application
2.1
Scope
This standard covers the fire protection and detection requirements for system and
traction substations and sectioning huts and indoor distribution substations in the
RailCorp electrical network. It shall be used for selection of appropriate fire protection
systems for new substations as well as for upgrading of existing substations.
Selection of fire protection systems shall be based on fire risk assessment using the Fire
Risk Evaluation Model (FREM) included in Appendix A. The FREM assesses both the
risks of fire due to the condition and configuration of the substation and the consequential
risk on RailCorp operations should the equipment or facility be lost.
When applying the standard to the designs for new or modified substations, designers
shall check the performance of designs at various stages and determine the fire risk
rating for the proposed substation configuration. Where an unacceptable level of fire risk
is found to exist in the proposed configuration, passive options to design out the risk
should be considered first. Where appropriate active fire protection and detection
systems may be incorporated to improve the fire risk rating of substations. However, it is
not the intention of this standard to mandate suppression wherever the model identifies a
high level of risk. An iterative approach is anticipated where the proposed configuration is
analysed using the FREM at appropriate points in the design process and the design
adjusted until an acceptable level of risk is achieved.
When applying to existing substations, where the resultant risk levels from FREM are
unacceptable the assessor shall investigate the causes of very high and extreme risk
levels and using the FREM explore what measures can be undertaken to lower the risks
to an acceptable level. Failure to bring the risk levels down to an acceptable level would
warrant a full fire safety audit in accordance with AS 4655.
References
3.1
Code of Practice
Building Code of Australia.
3.2
International Standards
BS 5306-4 Fire extinguishing installations and equipment on premises. Specification for
CO2
BS 5306-1 Code of practice for fire extinguishing installations and equipment on premises
Part 1: Hose reels and foam inlets
3.3
Australian Standards
The following Australian Standards are either referenced in this document or can provide
further information.
RailCorp
Issued May 2010
Page 5 of 32
Version 2.0

EP 99 00 00 08 SP
AS 2118.1 Automatic Fire Sprinklers general requirements

AS 2118.3 Automatic Fire Sprinklers Deluge
AS 4214 Gaseous Fire Extinguishing systems
AS 2444 Portable fire extinguishers and fire blankets Selection and location
AS 1851 Maintenance of Fire Protection Equipment AS 2419 Fire hydrant installations
AS 2441 Installation of fire hose reels;
AS 1603 Automatic fire detection and alarm systems;
AS1670 Fire detection, warning, control and intercom systems- System Design,
installation and commissioning
AS 4655 Fire safety audits
NFPA 15 Water Spray Fixed Systems for Fire Protection
3.4
Other References
NFPA 850 Recommended Practice for Fire Protection for Electric Generating Plants and
High Voltage Direct Current Converter Stations 2000 Edition.
BS 5306-0 Fire extinguishing installations and equipment on premises guide for the
selection of installed systems and other fire equipment.
BS 5306-2 Fire extinguishing installations and equipment on premises specification for
sprinkler systems. BS 5306-6 Section 6.1 Fire extinguishing installations and equipment
on premises foam systems specification for low expansion foam systems.
BS 5306-6 Section 6.2 Fire extinguishing installations and equipment on premises foam
systems specification for medium and high expansion foam systems.
Energy Supply Association of Australia D(6) 29-1982 Fire Protection of Electricity
Substations; Prepared by Committees 2.3 by Working Group 24 designated as D(6) 291982
Definitions and Abbreviations

For the purpose of this specification the definitions specified in the referenced Australian
Standards apply.
Fire Risks and Risk Assessment
5.1
Particular Fire Risks to Substations

Substations contain a number of features that represent particular fire risks:
RailCorps substations are generally unattended.
The equipment in substations operates at relatively high energy levels.
Some substation equipment contains significant fuel loads. In particular oil cooled
transformers and reactors, and large cable banks contain significant masses of
flammable material.
Cable ducts and conduits can act as paths for oil following a transformer failure.
Unsealed ducts can convey burning oil into adjacent buildings.
Substation fires cannot be attributed to one single cause. This standard does not concern
itself with the causes of fire within substations only the required method of detection or
extinguishment.
RailCorp
Issued May 2010
Page 6 of 32
Version 2.0

EP 99 00 00 08 SP
The final determination on whether suppression is required and or detection is dependant

on the level of risk acceptable across the network.
5.2
The Fire Risk Evaluation Model

Substations contain components and materials that constitute a fire risk.
The Fire Risk Evaluation Model (FREM) included within this standard identifies those
configurations, systems and components which contribute to the fire risks within
substations.
FREM assesses both the risk of fire due to the condition and configuration of the
substation and the consequential risk to RailCorp operations should the equipment or
facility be lost.
5.3
Fire Risk Rating of substations

The design for new or modified substations shall be checked for fire risk rating using the
FREM. Where the output risk levels are unacceptable for a particular design
configuration, designers shall investigate the causes for such high risk levels to either
eliminate the risks or to bring down the risk levels to an acceptable level by altering the
proposed configuration and/or including additional fire protection measures.
This standard shall also be used to identify existing substations in the RailCorp electrical
network that have high fire risks. If the FREM indicates an unacceptable risk level the
FREM shall be used to explore possible risk reduction measures.
The FREM included in Appendix A of this standard identifies those configurations,
systems and components that contribute to the fire risks within substations. The FREM
shall be used to rate each individual substation and used to determine what action is
required.
When design data for a new sub station or survey data from an existing substation is
entered in to the FREM a score is determined. On the basis of the score a risk rating is
assigned. These ratings are as follows;
EXTREME
Where an extreme rating is returned for a new design, features in the design that
caused the extreme fire risk rating shall be investigated and addressed in the
design.
For an existing substation rated as extreme, the assessor shall immediately notify
the Chief Engineer, Electrical Systems. A full audit of the substation is required.
The risk level must be reduced within 3 months. Subsequent inspection must occur
within 12 months.
V HIGH
Where a very high rating is returned for a new design, features in the design that
caused the very high fire risk rating shall be investigated and addressed in the
design.
For an existing substation rated as very high, the assessor shall immediately notify
the Chief Engineer, Electrical Systems. A full audit of the substation is required.
The risk level must be reduced within 9 months. Subsequent inspection must occur
within 12 months.
RailCorp
Issued May 2010
Page 7 of 32
Version 2.0

EP 99 00 00 08 SP
HIGH
Where a high rating is returned for a new design, features in the design that
caused the high fire risk rating shall be investigated and addressed in the design.
For an existing substation rated as high, the assessor using the FREM shall
investigate possible cost effective measures to reduce risk level and action within
12 months. Subsequent inspections shall be carried out at two-year intervals.
MODERATE
Where a moderate rating is returned for a new design, features in the design that
caused the moderate risk rating shall be investigated and addressed in the design.
For an existing substation rated as moderate, the assessor using the FREM shall
24 months. Subsequent inspections shall be carried out at four-year intervals.
LOW
Where a low rating is returned for a new design, the design shall be considered
acceptable.
Where a low rating is returned for an existing substation, risk level shall be
managed. Subsequent inspections shall be carried out at four-year intervals.
5.3.1
Process
Not all possible fire protection measures are necessary for every substation. In order to
achieve a cost effective outcome the Fire Risk Evaluation Model (FREM) included at
Appendix A. shall be used to guide the selection of a set of measures for each site.
The fire risk rating for each substation shall be determined as follows:
In the case of existing substations the substation shall be surveyed and data
collection input sheets completed on site;
In the case of a proposed substations the data collection input sheets shall be
completed on the basis of the design documentation;
Collected data on the input sheets to be transferred into the Fire Risk Evaluation
Model;
Review results of the Fire Risk Evaluation Model results sheets to identify those
components contributing the rating assigned;
Asset management and design teams review results and identify most appropriate
upgrade measures and or need for full fire audit of the substation.
The FREM Analysis must be carried out recognising the operational and
maintenance equipment configuration that will and do frequently exist at the
Substation.
5.3.2
Risk Results Review

Where a substation rating is equal to or greater than HIGH further action is required.
The RailCorp risk assessor shall interrogate a copy of the spreadsheet based Fire Risk
Evaluation Model and identify those components on the summary sheets with the highest
scores.
The input sheets for these high score areas shall be reviewed for reasons why the score
is high.
RailCorp
Issued May 2010
Page 8 of 32
Version 2.0

EP 99 00 00 08 SP
i.e. A particular substation may be scoring particularly highly because the

building is being used to store internal combustion engine operated vegetation
control equipment.
The assessor shall interrogate each high scoring field and evaluate those areas where
improvements can be made and schedule these in order of complexity and cost to
identify those works which can most easily be undertaken.
The assessor shall refer back to the Fire Risk Evaluation Model and having established
the order of complexity/cost for the potential improvements introduce these to the Fire
Risk Evaluation Model spreadsheet until the risk falls to an acceptable level. Where an
acceptable level cannot be reached then the substation shall undergo a full fire audit.
5.4
Full Fire Audit

A full fire audit in accordance with AS 4655 shall be undertaken where the Fire Risk
Evaluation Model identifies an Extreme risk or where mitigation of Very High Risk is not
possible.
The Full Fire Audit shall be an independent audit of the substation to identify RailCorps
exposure to the risk.
The audit shall include an evaluation of the impact of the loss of the substation including
the level of redundancy available, the availability of spare parts and the timeframe
required to make the substation operative after a fire.
Fire Protection Measures
6.1
General
This section identifies fire protection systems appropriate for use in RailCorp system and
traction substations. Systems for the passive prevention of fire propagation, and active
fire suppression are included. Both systems appropriate for retro-fitting to existing
substations and for incorporation in new substations are included.
6.2
Personnel Safety
Suppression systems adopted for use on fires involving electrical equipment shall not
increase the risk of electrocution to personnel involved in fighting the fire. Water based
systems shall only be used within the fire area once all electrical systems have been
isolated and made safe.
6.3
Passive fire protection measures
6.3.1
Application
Passive fire protection measures shall be provided where the risk of fire spread is
identified as too high. The risk is to be assessed with the FREM.
Passive measures shall be adopted in preference to the provision of active systems.
6.3.2
Separation
Physical separation between components within substations can provide a good level of
protection against propagation and spread of fire. The FREM incorporates input fields
associated with the separation of equipment.
RailCorp
Issued May 2010
Page 9 of 32
Version 2.0

EP 99 00 00 08 SP
Transformers utilising bulk oil shall be physically separated in accordance with the
requirements of NFPA 850.
Existing transformers are to incorporate firewalls whilst new installations shall be planned
where practical with adequate separation as outlined within NFPA 850. The table extract
from NFPA 850 below identifies the separation to be provided for oil filled external
transformers.
Transformer
Capacity
Less than 1893 L
1893 L to 18,925L
Over 18,925 L
Oil Minimum (Line-of-Sight)

Separation without Firewall
*
7.6m
15m
Table 1 - Separation of external oil filled transformers

Where separation is not possible a 2 hour fire wall shall be provided in accordance with
the requirements of NFPA 850, the following diagram identifies the firewall dimensions.
The dimension X is the separation distance and shall be taken from the above table.
6.3.3
NFPA 850 allows separation distances can be reduced or omitted for transformers
with less than 1893L of oil if suppression is provided. Where the content is less
than 1893L and separation is to be omitted then the individual transformer
arrangement should be assessed as part of a full fire safety audit.
Fire Sealing of Openings

All service penetrations including cable ducts and routes shall be fire sealed. Seals shall
be made between the cable and the conduit with proprietary fire stops. The stops shall fit
tightly around the cable and seal effectively to the conduit. The seals shall not be affected
by hydrocarbon products.
Openings into buildings between external transformers and switch rooms shall be closed
off with fire board to give a degree of separation equivalent to the surrounding structure.
6.3.3.1
New Substations
New substations are to be designed to allow easy inspection of seals and bushes where
possible without the need for portable ladders or equipment.
RailCorp
Issued May 2010
Page 10 of 32
Version 2.0

6.3.4
EP 99 00 00 08 SP
Fire retardant coverings

Where possible fire retardant cables shall be used inside substations.
For existing substations where determined to be necessary by the FREM substation
cables shall be coated with an ablative fire covering equal to the KBS coating marketed
by Projex Group Pty.
The coatings shall be applied along the entire length of the cable and fire stopped at walls
and sleeves to stop the spread of fire.
6.4
Active Fire Suppression Systems
6.4.1
General
Active fire suppression systems shall be used within RailCorp substation buildings where
the risk of fire is too great or the consequences of fire are unmanageable.
Active fire suppression systems shall only be included in the design where it has not been
possible to reduce the fire risk to an acceptable level by other means. Where the
deployment of active fire suppression systems is found to be necessary to reduce the fire
risk rating of a substation, an appropriate system shall be selected in accordance with
Section 6.4.3.
6.4.2
Active Fire Suppression Options

Active fire suppression system options appropriate for RailCorp substations include:
Fixed automatic aqueous fire fighting systems;

Hydrant systems for fire fighting purposes;
Extinguishers for first aid fire fighting;
Gaseous suppression systems.
Foam inlets
Many locations in urban areas will have local street hydrants present obviating the need
for hydrant systems. Hose reel systems are not to be used for the protection of
substations.
6.4.3
Active Fire Protection System Selection Matrix

This standard does not mandate the use of suppression systems for all substations and
associated equipment. The FREM shall be used to identify those substations where the
risk profile must be lowered using active fire protection.
The introduction of fire suppression systems shall be considered only where it has not
been possible to lower the substations risk profile by non active or passive measures to
an acceptable level. Where risks cannot be reduced to an acceptable level the FREM
identifies that a full fire audit is to take place.
The selection matrix identifies those suppression systems suitable for adoption within
RailCorp substations. These systems shall be included in the design only after evaluation
with the FREM or where required following a full fire audit.
RailCorp
Issued May 2010
Page 11 of 32
Version 2.0

EP 99 00 00 08 SP
Active Fire Protection System Selection Matrix
Location
Substation
incorporating external
transformer in covered
compound with
internal switch gear.
Substation
incorporating external
uncovered transformer
with internal
switchgear
RailCorp
Issued May 2010
High Velocity
Spray/Deluge
Systems
Required for
transformers and bulk
oil equipment when
fire risk or
consequential loss too
great.
Fire Fighting
Hydrants
Required to comply
with BCA clause E 1.3
Hose Reels
Gaseous Systems
Extinguishers
No
No
Yes
Provide to meet
requirements of
AS2444
To be provided when
fire risk or
great
System to be provided
additionally as
exposure protection
to/from adjacent public
buildings.
Boosted tank supply to

be provided where no
towns main is
available

towns main is
available
Required for
transformers and bulk
oil equipment when
fire risk or
great.
Required to comply
To be provided when
fire risk or
great

towns main is
available

towns main is
available
Automatic
Fire Alarms
Yes for alarm and
monitoring of internal
equipment.
Separate independent
system to be provided
for control of fire
suppression systems
No
No
Yes
Provide to meet
requirements of
AS2444
Yes for alarm and

monitoring of internal
equipment.
for control of fire
suppression systems
Page 12 of 32
Version 2.0

Location
Internal/Below ground
Transformer and
switch room
Ground level single

storey switch room
Ground level two

storey switch room
High Velocity
Spray/Deluge
Systems
No
No
No
EP 99 00 00 08 SP
Fire Fighting
Hydrants
Hose Reels
Gaseous Systems
Extinguishers
Required to comply
towns main is
available
No
Yes when fire risk or

great
Yes
Provide to meet
requirements of
AS2444
Required to comply
No

towns main is
available
Required to comply
towns main is
available
RailCorp
Issued May 2010
Novec 1230 only for

below ground
applications
great
Yes
Provide to meet
requirements of
AS2444
CO2 or Novec 1230

allowed above ground.
No

great
CO2 or Novec 1230
allowed above ground
Yes
Provide to meet
requirements of
AS2444
Automatic
Fire Alarms
Yes for alarm and
monitoring.
for control of fire
suppression systems
Yes for alarm and
monitoring.
for control of fire
suppression systems
Yes for alarm and
monitoring.
for control of fire
suppression systems
Page 13 of 32
Version 2.0

EP 99 00 00 08 SP
6.4.4
Fixed Automatic Aqueous Fire Fighting Systems (Automatic Fire

Sprinkler Systems)
6.4.4.1
Application
Fixed automatic aqueous fire fighting systems (water spray suppressant systems) where
required shall only be used on external oil transformers and bulk oil equipment.
Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems shall be designed to meet the performance
requirements of NFPA 15 and AS 2118.
Water spray systems shall be used for the fire protection of the following
Flammable liquids associated with transformers;
Electrical hazards including outside yard transformers and oil switches;
6.4.4.2
System
Water Spray systems where required shall incorporate automatic deluge valve
assemblies and open spray nozzles with pipe-work arrays to direct water onto the
surfaces of external transformers and bulk oil equipment.
Water spray deluge systems shall be provided to deluge with open sprayers in
accordance with AS 2118.3.
The systems shall be operated automatically from heat actuation devices incorporating
pilot sprinklers and multiple jet controls (MJC).
The water spray shall be arranged in accordance with AS 2118.3 to impact the surfaces
of a transformer and bulk oil equipment or store to provide both cooling to the
components but also form an emulsified water and oil mixture unable to ignite or burn.
The water spray systems shall provide complete water spray impingement on all exposed
exterior surfaces of the equipment in accordance with NFPA 15.
Where there is insufficient space to install water spray nozzles beneath transformers
water shall be introduced from the sides by horizontal nozzles.
Manual release controls for the deluge systems shall be provided at booster valve
stations and the control valve assemblies to allow activation by the brigade.
6.4.4.3
Water Supply for Fire Sprinkler Systems

Water based fire suppression systems shall be served from the local water mains with a
fire brigade booster inlet to allow the brigade to boost the water supply to the system.
Where a substation is remote from water mains water storage tanks and diesel backed
pumps shall be provided to supply the suppression systems. Storage volumes and pump
installations shall be in accordance with AS 2118 and shall have the capacity to maintain
the supply of water to the fire for no less than 1 hour.
Where the town water mains have insufficient water supply pressure or flow but adequate
reserves to continue supply for not less than 1 hour then a water booster pump-set(s)
shall be provided to boost the pressure from the town mains. The pump-set(s) shall be
provided in accordance with AS 2118.
RailCorp
Issued May 2010
Page 14 of 32
Version 2.0

6.4.4.4
EP 99 00 00 08 SP
Water Sprinkler Systems Activation

Water spray systems shall be activated automatically with fusible links or bulbs, in
accordance with AS 2118.
The water spray suppression system shall be monitored with flow switches to signal
activation to the RailCorp electrical SCADA system.
6.4.5
Fire Hydrants Systems
6.4.5.1
Application
Fire Hydrant Systems shall be used to fight substation fires only after full electrical
isolation.
6.4.5.2
Street Fire Hydrants

Many locations in urban areas will have local street hydrants present obviating the need
for additional hydrant systems.
Street fire hydrants shall be provided in accordance with the Building Code of Australia
(BCA) and AS 2419 for:
Buildings with an area greater than 500m
Where a fire brigade is available to fight fires.
Street hydrants shall be within 70m of a substation building or enclosure requiring
protection under the BCA.
6.4.5.3
On Site Fire Hydrant System

On site fire hydrant systems where required shall be provided in accordance with AS
2419.
6.4.5.4
Water Supply to On Site Fire Hydrant Systems

Hydrant system water supplies shall be adequate for meeting the system demands in
accordance with the requirements of AS 2419.
Where the local mains pressure and flow cannot meet these requirements a boosted
water supply shall be provided in accordance with AS2419 incorporating storage tanks
and pumps.
The on site hydrant system shall be served from a diesel driven pump-set dedicated to
the site.
A fire brigade booster inlet shall be provided to allow the brigade to boost pressures on
site when required.
Remote non mains fed hydrant systems shall be provided with tanks and pumps to
maintain water supplies for 4 hours in accordance with AS 2419.
6.4.5.5
Hose Reels
Hose reels shall not be provided within substations.
RailCorp
Issued May 2010
Page 15 of 32
Version 2.0

6.4.6
EP 99 00 00 08 SP
Gaseous Fire Suppression Systems

Gaseous fire suppression systems shall be in accordance with AS 4214.
The gaseous agents shall be selected from the following;
Carbon Dioxide (low pressure refrigerated C02 );
FM200 (Halocarbon) HFC-227ea;
Novec 1230 Fire Protection Fluid.
Reduced levels of oxygen within protected spaces following discharge can have adverse
effects on personnel within the rooms and enclosures. Warning signs shall be affixed in
prominent locations detailing the suppressants used and the operational safety
requirements. Audible and visual warning alarms shall operate to warn occupants to
evacuate the protected risk area upon fire detection.
The systems shall incorporate bottled supplies of extinguishant and delivery pipework to
the hazard discharge heads provided within the hazard area in accordance with AS 4214.
Manual lock-off station(s) shall be provided for isolating the systems during maintenance
or other occupied periods.
Carbon dioxide gas is heavier than air and will fall to the bottom of the enclosures it is
discharged into and flood around the different equipment. The injection of CO2 will
displace air from within the enclosure. Adequate venting shall be provided to ensure over
pressurisation of the enclosure does not occur compromising the stability of the
enclosure.
Detection systems provided to activate gaseous fire extinguishing systems shall be in
accordance with the requirements of AS 1670 and the Building Code of Australia.
Detector systems shall comply with AS 1603.
Detection systems provided to operate a fire extinguishing systems shall be linked back
to the RailCorp electrical SCADA system.
6.4.6.1
Gaseous Fire Suppression System Activation and Release

The fire suppressant gas shall be released after a pre-determined time delay to ensure
staff have left the area or to allow for investigation by security staff.
Pre discharge alarms shall be provided within the spaces protected with double knock
detection. Stop gas stations at entry points to the protected area shall be provided to
abort the gas discharge if required.
6.4.6.2
Safety Precautions for Total Flooding Systems

Carbon Dioxide and gaseous suppressants are/can be suffocating gases and the safety
requirements set out in AS 4214 and BS 5306 Pt 4 shall be complied with.
Following safety precautions for total flooding systems are recommended in BS 5306
Pt 4.
RailCorp
Issued May 2010
Page 16 of 32
Version 2.0

Occupancy
Door Lock
Changeover
Switch (1)
EP 99 00 00 08 SP
Automatic/
Manual
Changeover
Switch (2)
Manual
Valve (3)
Auto
Valve (4)
System
Status
Unit (5)
System
Isolated
Lamps
(6)
Normally
Yes or
Yes or
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
occupied
(4)
(3)
Not normally
Yes or
Recommended
Yes or (3)
Optional
Yes
Optional
occupied
(2)
Door lock changeover switch (1) shall include an internal escape override. A contacted keep as
opposed to a contacted lock shall be used.
Manual valve (3) is a monitored manual only valve sited in the supply line from the carbon
dioxide containers.
Automatic valve (4) is monitored normally closed valve sited in the supply line from the carbon
dioxide containers that will open only on receipt of a signal from the detection system or manual
release system.
A means of manual operating the valve shall be provided. A means of isolating the valve shall
be provided.
6.4.6.3
Area Ventilation After Discharge of Carbon Dioxide

A means of mechanically or naturally ventilating areas after discharge of carbon dioxide
shall be provided.
The standard BS 5306 Pt 4 dictates that the means provided for ventilation should not
form part of the normal building ventilation system and should incorporate extraction
arrangements at low level in the protected area. Care should be taken to ensure that the
post-fire atmosphere is not ventilated into other parts of the building.
6.4.7
Handheld Extinguishers
Extinguishers shall be provided for first aid protection within transformer rooms and
substations. Extinguishers are not to be considered anything more than a first line of
defence against coincidental fires during personnel occupation.
Personnel shall not attempt to tackle a fire unless they are competent to do so and are
confident that it can be handled with the first aid protection devices available.
Extinguishers shall be provided in accordance with AS 2444 and maintained in
accordance with AS1851. Extinguishers shall be located at entrances and on escape
routes from the rooms and in all instances no further than 20m from the fire risk.
6.4.8
Foam Suppressants
6.4.8.1
Application
The NSWFB carries Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) on its fire trucks in 20 litre pails
for use on oil and flammable liquid type fires.
The NSWFB fire trucks incorporate foam induction equipment on the pump and AFFF
foam making branches for fire hoses.
Fire fighting foam inlets shall be provided on below ground bulk oil transformers and
equipment rooms where the risk is too high. The level of risk is to be assessed with the
FREM.
RailCorp
Issued May 2010
Page 17 of 32
Version 2.0

EP 99 00 00 08 SP
Foam inlet systems shall only be introduced into below ground substations following
agreement with the NSWFB.
6.4.8.2
System
Foam inlet systems shall be provided in accordance with BS 5306 Pt 1.
Inlets shall be positioned with their centre line 400 to 600mm above ground level. The
inlet breechings shall be located within a box on the face of the building clearly marked
with the words Foam Inlet to Transformers in red letters no less than 25mm high.
The foam inlet pipework shall be heavy grade steel 80mm diameter with a fall to the
transformer chamber.
The pipework route shall be less than 18m in length. Inlet locations shall be agreed with
the NSWFB.
Foam inlet systems shall only be manually operated by the NSWFB.
An audible alarm shall be incorporated to warn personnel of activation prior to discharge.
Fire Detection and Alarm Systems
7.1
Application
Automatic detection systems shall be provided within substation switchrooms in
accordance with the Building Code of Australia and AS 1670.
Detection systems provided within substation switchrooms shall be air sampling systems
in accordance with AS 1670.
7.1.1
Aspirating Smoke Detection Systems

Air sampling aspirating smoke detection and alarm systems shall be provided within
substation buildings.
RailCorp substations incorporate equipment which when operating can cause ionised
gases to be produced. This can cause sensitive smoke detection systems to go into
alarm erroneously.
The generation of ionised gas is a normal bi-product of the substations operation and
false alarms within detection systems in response to this can lead to complacency.
Air sampling systems shall be provided within the substation buildings to monitor for
smoke. The detection zones close to the equipment likely to cause ionisation shall have
their sensitivity set so as to minimise false alarms.
The system shall be configured so that two separate sensing zones have to alarm before
alarm signals are raised. One sensing zone is to be local to the equipment the other
remote.
The air sampling systems shall have the following alarm levels.
RailCorp
Issued May 2010
a)
Stage 1 - Initial detection. Signal to SCADA system.
b)
Stage 2 - Alarm to SCADA System recommending investigation/ evacuation.
c)
Stage 3 - Full alarm. Operations centre evaluate alarm.
Page 18 of 32
Version 2.0

d)
7.1.1.1
EP 99 00 00 08 SP
Stage 4 - Intervention by brigade. The detection devices shall be fully monitored

for alarm and/or fault condition to ensure reliable service and to transmit a fire
alarm signal to a monitored emergency control centre.
Detectors
Smoke detectors shall be multipoint aspirated smoke detectors (MASD) within air
sampling systems.
7.1.1.2
Monitoring
Fire detection systems at substations shall be linked back to the central control centre on
the RailCorp electrical SCADA system.
Fire Services Systems Maintenance
8.1
General
Fire suppression and detection systems require ongoing inspection, testing and
maintenance to ensure their continued functionality.
Technical Maintenance Plans including tasks for inspection, testing and maintenance of
fire systems incorporated into substations shall be developed in accordance with the
RailCorp Maintenance Requirements Analysis Manual (MRAM) and AS 1851
Maintenance of fire protection systems and equipment.
RailCorp
Issued May 2010
Page 19 of 32
Version 2.0

Appendix A
EP 99 00 00 08 SP
Fire Risk Evaluation Model Manual and Guidelines
Fire Risk Evaluation Model - Manual

The Fire Risk Evaluation Model included in this standard is a risk evaluation tool
designed to rank the different fire risks and systems within substations against each other
to yield a score for the substation. The model assesses both the risk of fire due to the
condition and configuration of the substation and the consequential risk on RailCorp
operations should the equipment or facility be lost. It can be used to evaluate risk rating
of new substation designs and existing RailCorp substations.
The tool evaluates whether risks are high within a substation and gives the user the
opportunity to test why the substation scored badly. It allows the user to adjust the
various input fields to improve the risk rating i.e. a particular substation may score badly
because it has many cable conduits that are not fire stopped, the tool will allow the user
to introduce such protection measures and see the substations rating improve.
The introduction of fire suppression systems within substations will be costly and the Fire
Risk Evaluation Model allows each substation to be methodically tested for other more
cost effective measures before the decision to introduce suppression is made.
The suppression systems adopted for use on fires involving electrical equipment must not
increase the risk of electrocution to personnel involved in fighting the fire. Where water
based systems are used all components within the fire area must be isolated and made
safe prior to activation.
Process and Inputs

In using the fire risk evaluation model, RailCorp staff will be required to attend the sites
nominated and provide inputs into the model.
Within the assessment sheets there are categories that are flanked by boxes. Depending
on the equipment found in the substations, the boxes must:
be marked with the numeral 1
where the red box is located next to the main heading, only 1 box in line can be
marked.
When more than 1 box is checked and is not permitted, conditional formatting has
been introduced and all boxes will turn red to indicate an input error. This is shown
below.
RAILCORP SUBSTATION FIRE RISK SITE INSPECTION SHEET
SUBSTATION
Master
DATE
ADDRESS
INSPECTOR
FUNCTION
Traction
LOCATION
Surface
Distribution
1 System
Underground
When loading data into the model, input data into the Site Sheet (Sheet 1) first.
Common fields will then be automatically input to other sheets.
RailCorp
Issued May 2010
Page 20 of 32
Version 2.0

EP 99 00 00 08 SP
Outputs
Once the assessment sheets are completed, the output sheet will have calculated
numbers under the following headings:
Master
SUB STATION
RESULTS SHEET
EQUIPMENT / FIRE SOURCE
FIRE
RATING
RESIDUAL
RATING
IMPACT
High Voltage Switchgear
4.7
4.2
4.7
Rectifier Transformer
6.9
6.8
0.7
Rectifier
0.0
0.0
0.0
System Transformer - 33kV
0.0
0.0
0.0
17.9
17.6
17.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
Reactors
0.0
0.0
0.0
1500 V DC Switchgear
1.0
0.9
0.3
EQUIPMENT / FIRE SOURCE
FIRE
RATING
RESIDUAL
RATING
IMPACT
Medium Voltage Switchgear - 11kV
8.4
7.6
8.4
Medium Voltage Switchgear - 2kV
0.0
0.0
0.0
Dist / Auxillary Transformer
0.0
0.0
0.0
Cables
0.0
0.0
0.0
Miscellaneous Electrical Items
0.1
0.1
0.1
Battery System
0.0
0.0
0.0
Low Voltage and Control Equipment
0.0
0.0
0.0
Incidental Plant and Equipment
0.0
0.0
Surrounding Environment
1.3
1.2
Diesel Generator Exhaust
0.0
0.0
Vehicle Impact
0.0
0.0
RailCorp
Issued May 2010
HEALTH
&
SAFETY
HEALTH
&
SAFETY
Page 21 of 32
Version 2.0

EP 99 00 00 08 SP
The final numbers that have been calculated under the following headings have been
graded in terms of relative risk as follows:
RESIDUAL
RATING
FIRE RATING
TOTAL for SUB

STATION
IMPACT
HEALTH &
SAFETY
40
38
32
132
RISK LEVEL
MODERATE
MODERATE
MODERATE
V-HIGH
DISRUPTION
40
32
MODERATE
MODERATE
40
32
MODERATE
MODERATE
REDUNDANCY
FACTOR
The following headings are defined as follows:

Fire Rating The raw or total risk rating for the substation ignoring any fire detection and
suppression that may be installed.
Residual Rating The risk rating allowing for the benefit provided by fire detection and
suppression systems.
Impact The risk rating (based on the residual rating) modified for the level of spare parts
or built in redundancy for this substation.
Health and Safety This the level of overall risk posed by the emergency egress facilities
provided in the substation.
Disruption The Impact risk rating modified by the number of lines that would be affected
by the loss of the substation.
Redundancy Factor The Impact risk rating modified by the level of redundancy provided
by substations either side of the station being analysed.
Numerical Trigger Points

The 5 risk levels that could originate under the following headings and are triggered on
achieving the following numbers for the below categories
FIRE RATING
RESIDUAL RATING
IMPACT
< 10 Low Risk

< 50 Moderate Risk
< 100 High Risk
< 500 Very High Risk
> 500 Extreme Risk
RailCorp
Issued May 2010
Page 22 of 32
Version 2.0

EP 99 00 00 08 SP
The 5 risk levels that originate under the following heading is triggered on achieving the
following numbers:
HEALTH & SAFETY
< 50 Extreme Risk

< 150 Very High Risk
< 300 High Risk
< 600 Moderate
> 600 Low Risk
Definition of Risk Levels

FREM assesses both the risk of fire due to the condition and configuration of the
substation and the consequential risk to RailCorp operations should the equipment or
facility be lost. When design data for a new sub station or survey data from an existing
substation is entered in to the FREM, following risk ratings will be assigned by the
program to the substation assessed:
EXTREME
Where an extreme rating is returned for a new design, features in the design that
caused the extreme fire risk rating shall be investigated and addressed in the
design. For an existing substation rated as extreme, the assessor shall
immediately notify the Chief Engineer, Electrical Systems.
V HIGH
Where a very high rating is returned for a new design, features in the design that
caused the very high fire risk rating shall be investigated and addressed in the
design. For an existing substation rated as very high, the assessor shall
immediately notify the Chief Engineer, Electrical Systems.
HIGH
Where a high rating is returned for a new design, features in the design that
caused the high fire risk rating shall be investigated and addressed in the design.
For an existing substation rated as high, the assessor using the FREM shall
12 months. Subsequent inspections shall be carried out at two-year intervals.
MODERATE
Where a moderate rating is returned for a new design, features in the design that
caused the moderate risk rating shall be investigated and addressed in the design.
For an existing substation rated as moderate, the assessor using the FREM shall
24 months. Subsequent inspections shall be carried out at four-year intervals.
RailCorp
Issued May 2010
Page 23 of 32
Version 2.0

EP 99 00 00 08 SP
LOW
Where a low rating is returned for a new design, features in the design that caused
the low risk rating shall be investigated and addressed in the design. Where a low
rating is returned for an existing substation, risk level shall be managed.
Subsequent inspections shall be carried out at four-year intervals.
Limitations of Fire Risk Evaluation Model

This section defines the limitations of the application of the results. In this context,
assumptions are defined to be inputs to the assessment, which may include
simplifications of reality, based on engineering judgement or accepted approaches that
are necessary to enable the issues in question to be rationally addressed.
These inputs are spelt out in order that users of the tool are made aware of them and
there applicability can be reviewed. Limitations are defined as boundaries to the
applicability of the results, including aspects, which have been excluded from
consideration.
Any audits and subsequent outputs do not include:
Detailed design
Implementation of the results of the study
Ongoing inspections
Certification, commissioning or maintenance of systems.
Involvement in an appeals process of a peer review process
Gaining building approval
The fire risk assessments and the reports do not constitute an audit in accordance
with AS4655 or any other relevant Australian Standard.
The fire and risk assessments to not constitute a BCA compliance/due diligence
assessment.
The fire and risk assessment tool does not constitute a fundamental Fire
Engineering Assessment or Quantitative Risk Assessment of absolute risk
The fire and risk assessments do not constitute an OH&S audit.
The tool is limited to inspections of substations for collection of specific data to go
into a relative risk tool for specified corporate purposes.
Fire Risk Evaluation Model - Guidelines

Table in the following pages provides the users of the Fire Risk Evaluation Model
guidelines to the correct interpretation of terms used in the audit sheets that provide input
to the risk evaluation model. Assessors of a particular site or a design shall first
familiarise with these terms and their proper interpretation to obtain a consistent risk
rating of substations when using the model.
RailCorp
Issued May 2010
Page 24 of 32
Version 2.0

Sheet
Number
1
EP 99 00 00 08 SP
RAILCORP SUBSTATION FIRE RISK SITE INSPECTION SHEET - GUIDELINES AND DEFINITIONS
Main
Sub
2nd
Comments
Category
Category
Category
SITE DETAILS
Traction
Traction substations will have a rectifier within it.
FUNCTION
Distribution
Distribution substations converts high voltage to low
voltage.(415/120V)
System
System substations transformers or switches high
voltage only. They have no rectifiers within them.
Surface
The substation is totally above ground.
LOCATION
Underground
The substation is below ground and in some cases
form part of a main train station
Surrounds
Surrounded
The substation is within a built up area and
predominantly surrounded by residential
development.
Partial
The substation is partially surrounded by
development. An example of this would be residential
or commercial adjacent to rail corridor.
Open Area
The substation is within a suburban environment but
not surrounded by development.
Rural/Bushland
A substation that is within a well timbered area or
open plains with no development surrounding it.
Assessed Risk
Bushfire
Substation is located in bushfire prone area.
High Risk
Information on risks to location from miscellaneous
outside agencies. This does not include risks due to
the equipment itself.
Low Risk
Information on risks to location from miscellaneous
outside agencies. This does not include risks due to
the equipment itself.
Vehicle Impact
Main Road
Speed limit >60kph and or heavy traffic.
VEHICLE IMPACT
On Bend/Junction
Location of substation located on a bend of a main
road.
No buffer
Substation is located bounding roadside.
Quiet Road
Speed limit <60kph and low volumes of traffic.
RailCorp
Issued May 2010
Page 25 of 32
Version 2.0

Sheet
Number
EP 99 00 00 08 SP
Sub
2nd
Comments
Category
Category
Vegetation
>6m Clear
Vegetation such as grass, trees, that are greater than
6m away from a building or nearest piece of
equipment or fuel source. Vegetation does not include
mown grass or small trees or potted plants. If the area
has a dense coverage of grass, trees etc then these
should be mentioned.
<6m Clear
Vegetation such as grass, trees, that are less than 6m
away from the building or nearest piece of equipment
or fuel source. Vegetation does not include mown
grass or small trees or potted plants. If the area has a
dense coverage of grass, trees etc then these should
be mentioned.
Residential
>6m Clear
Residential properties consisting of dwellings, town
houses, or hotels greater than 6m from away from a
building or nearest piece of equipment or fuel source.
<6m Clear
Residential properties consisting of dwellings, town
houses, or hotels less than 6m from the building or
nearest piece of equipment or fuel source.
Industrial
>6m Clear
Industrial premises such as car yards, paints shops,
manufacturing, warehouse.
<6m Clear
Industrial premises such as car yards, paints shops,
manufacturing, warehouse.
Combustible
Examples may be a tyre storage facility, warehouse
or others with high fuel load.
High Risk
Examples may be Paint shops, car repairs where
large quantities of flammable materials (especially
liquid or gases) are kept.
Ease of Finding
Visible
Visible from the road without signage.
EMERGENCY SERVICES
Clear Signs
Signage to the substation from the road is in place.
Road Access
All Weather
Bitumen or sealed road. Access not a problem for any
emergency vehicle.
>One Road
Alternative access into the substation. Applicable in
remote locations.
Main
Category
SURROUNDS
RailCorp
Issued May 2010
Page 26 of 32
Version 2.0

Sheet
Number
Main
Category
EP 99 00 00 08 SP
Sub
2nd
Comments
Category
Category
Height/Width Restrictions
Would emergency vehicles have to go underneath a
rail bridge for example. Is the road width available for
say a fire appliance (>5.0m)
BUILDING
ONE,TWO,THREE
Construction
Brick and Timber
Construction of the substation consists of brick walls

and timber roof components such as trusses, timber
framing and the like. Inspection of ceiling space may
be necessary. Structure has combustible load.
Timber construction throughout.
Brick walls, metal and/or tiled roof and no timber in
the roof or internal walls.
Alternative egress could be provided in addition to the
exit on the main floor.
Egress to outside of building.
Timber
Non-combustible
Main Level
Alt Egress
Into Open
Upper floor area

Ancillary Rooms/areas
Flammable
Able to contain materials that are flammable including

flammable aerosols, liquids and the like stored in a
room or cabinet.
Office fuel load would consist of desks, chairs, filing
cabinets and compactors.
The compound is a noted egress route from the
building.
Could be an area remote from the building within the
compound where someone could take refuge from a
fire within the building, or equipment in the
component.
Gate is provided within the compound fencing.
The gate is locked for security purposes. Keys should
be carried with personnel at all times.
All materials are stored in a designated place. Exits
are not obstructed. Compound has grass mowed if
present. No rubbish is present.
Office/area
Egress Route
COMPOUND 1 & 2
Refuge
Gate/Door
Locked
HOUSEKEEPING
RailCorp
Issued May 2010
General Area
Excellent
Page 27 of 32
Version 2.0

Sheet
Number
EP 99 00 00 08 SP
Sub
2nd
Comments
Category
Category
Average
Some areas of the above criteria are present.
Poor
All areas in the above criteria are not evident.
Patrol
Regular patrol/inspection by internal/external
SECURITY
personnel that would be able to detect an early stage
of fire. Patrols would occur regularly but they must
occur several times a day, every day.
Monitored Doors
This refers to the doors into the actual buildings and
does not include gates in perimeter fences.
CCTV
This means that it is not monitored but pictures go to
tape. If the signal goes back to a control room that is
constantly monitored this should be indicated by
ticking the monitored box.
Suppression
Emulsifiers - High Velocity Jets This system would be only present in outdoor bunded
FIRE CONTROL
areas where oil would be present. They would stop
the oil from burning and spreading. They would not be
located inside the building.
Hose reels
36m fire hose reels are located in the substations
Extinguishers
Portable fire extinguishers suitable to the risk of fire
are provided. Eg CO2, Foam etc.
Hydrants
Hydrant points - there may be standpipes within the
building near the exits, outside near the exits or there
may be a tapping outside the compound.
Detection
VESDAS
Aspirating smoke detection system that will have
plastic pipes with sampling points.
High Voltage
132, 66 or 33kV
SERVICES
Medium Voltage
11 or 2kV
Low Voltage
415, 240 or 120V
Tracks Served
Number of single tracks.
Impact on Service
None
No impact on train service
REDUNDANCY
Peak
Peak services cannot run at peak levels (both trains
and loading) but can run at off peak train frequencies
and loadings.
Main
Category
RailCorp
Issued May 2010
Page 28 of 32
Version 2.0

Sheet
Number
EP 99 00 00 08 SP
Sub
2nd
Comments
Category
Category
Off Peak
No services can be supported over this section of the
line.
HIGH VOLTAGE
SWITCHGEAR
Indoor/Outdoor
Where equipment of a single type (eg transformers)
LOCATION
are located both indoors and outdoors, and there is
no provision to select something other than indoors or
outdoors, then always select indoors. Where there
are two sections for the same type of plant, and if
there is not two sizes of that plant (piece of
equipment), then it is OK to use one section on the
data capture sheet for the indoor equipment and
another for outdoor equipment.
Nearest Fuel Source
Nearest combustible item which could include
building or equipment.
Bunding
All Individual
Separate bund for each piece of equipment.
CONSTRUCTION
All combined
One bund serving all pieces of equipment.
Partial
Some bunding may be present.
Underground Sump
Single
Single sump for all pieces of equipment.
Individual
Individual sumps for all pieces of equipment.
Partial
Some sumps may be present.
Isolated
Stand alone breakers.
CONFIGURATION
Single S/Board
All breakers in one switchboard.
Many S/Boards
More than one individual, separated switchboard, with
each switchboard containing more than one breaker.
Complete Breakers
Onsite
On site but not connected.
SPARES
>1
More than one on-site and not connected.
Off site
Off site
>1
More than one off site.
RECTIFIER
Installed
Installed and connected.
QUANTITY
Needed For Load
Required to provide maximum traction power.
Main
Category
RailCorp
Issued May 2010
Page 29 of 32
Version 2.0

Sheet
Number
EP 99 00 00 08 SP
Main
Sub
2nd
Comments
Category
Category
Category
RECTIFIER
TRANSFORMER
LOCATION
SYSTEM TRANSFORMER
Step down to 33kV
From 132 or 66kV
(to 33kV)
Step down to 11kV
From 66 or 33kV
(to 11kV)
Step down to 2kV
From 33 or 11kV
(to 2kV)
Tx Separation
This is the distance between like transformers.
LOCATION
1500 Volt DC
SWITCHGEAR
HV AND DC POWER
CABLES
MAIN ROOMS, BELOW
MAIN ROOM, OUTDOORS
RailCorp
Issued May 2010
Cluster -Horizontal
Type A,B C, D
Cluster - Vertical
Cableway - Horizontal
Type A,B C, D
Type A,B C, D
Cableway - Vertical
Chase/Trench
Type A,B C, D
3 or more cables laid horizontally half a cable

diameter apart, containing the following types:
Type A Cables - Pressurised Nitrogen
Type B Cables - Oil impregnated paper insulated with
lead sheathing, flame retardant halogen free R-HF
Type C Cables - Mineral Insulated Non Draining
(MIND), PVC sheathing, PIMIND (Mass Impregnated
Mineral Oil Non Draining)
Type D Cables - XLPE with PVC/HDPE, XLPE with
megalon, modern XLPE insulated cables, modern
PVC/PVC insulated cables, vulcanised Indian rubber,
EPR (Ethylene-propylene rubber), XLPE/HD,
As above - but vertical. Cable types refer above
Located on horizontal cableway with proper
separation distances. Cable Types refer above
As above - vertical. Cable Types refer above
Located in trench. Cable Types refer above
Page 30 of 32
Version 2.0

Sheet
Number
EP 99 00 00 08 SP
Main
Sub
2nd
Comments
Category
Category
Category
Penetration from one room to another that are not
PENETRATIONS
properly sealed. Holes in walls are to be taken as a
path for fire and the distance between a piece of
equipment and a fuel source (or similar piece of
equipment) should be measured through the hole.
The hole has to be a reasonable size such that fire
and heat could pass through the hole. Proper sealant
used.
Number of cable joints present.
CABLE JOINTS
Adjacent to Cables
Any combustible material near (<1m) to cables.
EXTRA FUEL LOAD
Oil into Trench
Is it possible for oil to drain/leak into trench.
Cable Coating
Have cables been separately coated with fire
PROTECTION
protection material.
ENERGY DISSAPTING
RESISTORS
Installed
These resistors will generally only occur on the blue
QUANTITY
mountains line.
AIR BLAST AIR BREAK
SWITCHES
Size
Most of the substations will have both 66kV and 11kV
BATTERIES AND
SYSTEMS
LOCATION
Location
FUEL SOURCE
Near Batteries
INCIDENTAL PLANT &

EQUIPMENT
GENERATOR
RailCorp
Issued May 2010
Exhaust
Separate Room
Common Areas
Timber/Solid
Liquid/Gas
Completely separate room within building with door.

In building but not isolated.
Timber/combustible material within 2m of battery or
within the separate room.
As above but flammable liquids or gases.
Inside
Flue exhausts inside the building.
Page 31 of 32
Version 2.0

Sheet
Number
EP 99 00 00 08 SP
Sub
2nd
Comments
Category
Category
Outside
Flue exhausts outside building.
Fuel Source
Any fuel source (<2m) of flue outlet.
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles permanently stored on site
MOBILE PLANT
NOTES
Refer to Manual for Input
requirements into the
model.
Main
Category
RailCorp
Issued May 2010
Page 32 of 32
Version 2.0

Subestation Fire Protection Ep 99-00-00 08 SP

Cargado por

Información del documento

Título original

Derechos de autor

Formatos disponibles

Compartir este documento

Compartir o incrustar documentos

Opciones para compartir

¿Le pareció útil este documento?

¿Este contenido es inapropiado?

Copyright:

Formatos disponibles

Subestation Fire Protection Ep 99-00-00 08 SP

Cargado por

Copyright:

Formatos disponibles

EP 99 00 00 08 SP

SUBSTATIONS FIRE PROTECTION

Issued May 2010

Chief Engineer Electrical

UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED

RailCorp Engineering Standard Electrical

UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED

RailCorp Engineering Standard Electrical

Scope and Application ...........................................................................................................5

Definitions and Abbreviations ...............................................................................................6

Fire Risks and Risk Assessment...........................................................................................6

Fire Protection Measures .......................................................................................................9

UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED

RailCorp Engineering Standard Electrical

6.4.6.2 Safety Precautions for Total Flooding Systems........................16

Fire Detection and Alarm Systems......................................................................................18

Fire Services Systems Maintenance ...................................................................................19

UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED

RailCorp Engineering Standard Electrical

Scope and Application

UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED

RailCorp Engineering Standard Electrical

AS 2118.1 Automatic Fire Sprinklers general requirements

Definitions and Abbreviations

Fire Risks and Risk Assessment

Particular Fire Risks to Substations

UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED

RailCorp Engineering Standard Electrical

The final determination on whether suppression is required and or detection is dependant

The Fire Risk Evaluation Model

Fire Risk Rating of substations

UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED

RailCorp Engineering Standard Electrical

Risk Results Review

UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED

RailCorp Engineering Standard Electrical

i.e. A particular substation may be scoring particularly highly because the

Full Fire Audit

Fire Protection Measures

Passive fire protection measures

UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED

RailCorp Engineering Standard Electrical

Oil Minimum (Line-of-Sight)

Table 1 - Separation of external oil filled transformers

Fire Sealing of Openings

UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED

RailCorp Engineering Standard Electrical

Fire retardant coverings

Active Fire Suppression Systems

Active Fire Suppression Options

Fixed automatic aqueous fire fighting systems;

Active Fire Protection System Selection Matrix

UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED

RailCorp Engineering Standard Electrical

Active Fire Protection System Selection Matrix

Boosted tank supply to

Boosted tank supply to

Boosted tank supply to

Boosted tank supply to

UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED

Yes for alarm and

RailCorp Engineering Standard Electrical

Ground level single