Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
available resources and job context make it easy to blame the new librarian instead of doing
the broad honest analysis of the situation.
Data friends, we need to stop doing hours of unseen labor and unpaid reading in the evenings and
weekends. We need to negotiate our roles to a manageable level and pace ourselves. We need to
share our experiences in developing sustainable data roles, both on campus and with peer
institutions considering a new hire.
Mission creep hurts: we do and learn so much, so fast, that a sense of mastery in our roles, of
connection to campus, and of satisfaction in our jobs can be lacking.
It can also be dangerous for the library, which may ask one person to take on for five new roles
but support none of them effectively. Speaking strategically, do we really want to move beyond
helping people to access resources (our traditional role), and into tutoring research methods,
cleaning up after large grants, and taking over university publishing?
Some questions to ask before you hire a data librarian: How will a data librarian work with
partners on campus? Should a data lab be in the library, or in another building? Should data
librarians be teaching, or mostly doing reference and consults? How much time will we give a
data librarian to sort out these emerging issues, and how much support will we put behind them?
How much will we invest in retraining existing librarian to take on some aspect of data, rather
than asking the newest colleague to do the most complex work? How can we attract talented
librarians to develop the librarys data resources, without overcommitting ourselves on
campus?
Setting up data services on a new campus is a full-time job in itself, especially if serving as a
cross-campus coordinator. Being *the* data reference person is also a substantial job. Library
schools dont yet teach these skills, and the new librarian will lack senior colleaguesso the
librarian will have to teach themselves from the ground up.
But it goes on. The SAME ad wants the SAME person to be a data tools expert and learning
technologist:
Job 4: The Data Viz Librarian (Learning Technologist):
The next section of the ad sounds like what learning technologists or academic IT people do,
even on a small campus:
keep tabs on qualitative and quantitative research tools
keep tabs on new statistics tools and academic technology
be prepared to teach people these new tech tools
advise people on appropriate data analysis tools and methods
provide tech support for librarians, faculty, students, and staff in these areas
Lets be clear. Learning technologists are amazing, and extremely busy. If several hundred
faculty and 2,000-10,000 students hear that a data librarian can train them in Excel, STATA,
NVIVO, SPSS, and/or data viz (forget about GIS; GIS is for geography and maps librarians)
well, you might just want this Data Tools Librarian to be separate from the Data Services
Librarian above.
(And of course, all of these tools will also take countless hours to learn).
But theres one final job hidden within this SAME job posting:
Job 5: The Quantitative Data Librarian (Methods Prof):
This person is asked to:
know statistics at a high level, and teach data + statistics skills
teach how to manipulate data in SPSS and Stata (years of prior experience will help)
teach these data and statistical tools to faculty, students, and staff
teach how to manipulate data in R (requires coding / programming skills)
strongly understand data structures (computational knowledge)
create and teach data visualizations
Let me gently suggest that if you actually know statistics, statistical programming, data
structures, data science, and/or data visualization well enough to jump in and teach students,
researchers and office professionals: you are amazing. Build a portfolio, my friend, and seek out
a $60-$100K starting salary in industry or tech roles. You can pro bono with poor kids on the
weekends if you want to save the world. Dont settle for a $40-$60K entry-level job that also
wants you to be three other people at once.
Data Librarians are Amazing Assets (But Lets Create a Single Clear Focus)
You know what? I get that new faculty or staff allotments are rare and precious things in
academic libraries. I get that. But the incredibly diverse skills and experiences requested of new
data librarians, without a clear peer group, and working as a team of one, can so easily lead to
burnout: should I focus on being a detail-minded data archivist? An engaging stats professor? A
young data science whiz? A patient campus coordinator? An all-knowing reference librarian?
All of the above? [Choking sounds].
The Everything Data Librarian requested in the job advertisement above joined a liberal arts
college. The challenges for data librarians at a major research institution remain just as real.
And yet it doesnt have to be this way. A few recommendations before you go:
Libraries, keep hiring data librarians. Theyre highly skilled and energetic. But the position
should be focused and pay closer to market rates for specialized skills. Asking for everything just
creates ambiguous roles and workplace conflict: even talented professionals cant develop ten
technical skillsets at once. And without clear guidelines for tenure and promotion, it sets your
most talented librarians up for stress and failure. Data librarians arent a separate creature from
everyone else, so all the more reason to make their job manageable and fairly defined.
Libraries, think about your market and your mission. Should librarians teach software (like
learning technologists) or quantitative research methods (like econ or poli-sci professors) in
addition to all of their regular tasks? Does it really benefit the library to take on major new roles
without additional staff? If not, where is the added value that libraries bring to data, and how
does it align with other offices on campus and with the core mission of the library?
Library school students, keep studying data. Its a growing area, deeper skills will mean better
pay, and the kinks will be ironed out through our work together. Libraries are doing amazing
things with data, and you can join us!
Data librarians, keep on keeping on. Slow down, build relationships, and switch jobs if
necessary. Keep building skills, but let yourself rest. I mean it. Find a community, and train up
bright-eyed young undergrads and MLIS interns to join you (especially students of color; they
need access to the most promising subsets of librarianship, too!). Ultimately, we increase the
value of academic libraries by bringing key resources to faculty and students, and this is a pie big
enough for all of us.
We need you. We just need you as one subfield-focused data librarian among a thousand
colleagues near and far - not as the Everything Data Librarian.
Sincerely, Alexis Johnson