Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
2010 3
OIL DRILLING & PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGY
Vol. 32 No. 2
Mar. 2010
1 1 1 2 2 2 1
1. 8340002. 610500
TE257+.1A
Abstract: With the development and progress of the underbalanced perforating technology, some different underbalanced pressure
design methods have been developed. However, the factors that conventional method has taken into consideration are relatively simple,
so the results vary a lot with different methods, resulting in great inconvenience to field application. So on the basis of considering the
adventages and disadvantages of conventional methods, a new method taking many factors into account, such as reservoir permeability,
porosity, rock mechanics parameter, sanding history, safe casing pressure, rock mechanic stability of bullet hole , etc. The new method
takes safety factors into account more thoroughly as compared to the conventional one. It has been applied to the No.1 Oil Production
Factory of Xinjiang Oilfield Company and remarkable effect has been achieved. After perforation in 8 wells, these wells all can perform
as flow production naturally, attending higher productivity. All of these indicate that the new method of has certain practicability.
Key words: perforating; underbalanced pressure design; software; Xinjiang Oilfield
1
W. T. Bell
Conoco
Behrmann
2-5
20
119
CH2056
1
Conventional underbalanced perforating
pressure design method
1
1
Table 1Comparison of different design methods
W. T. Bell
45
lnpmin=5.471 0.3668lnk
Conoco
lnpmin=17.24/k0.3
Tas 300 s/m
pmax=24.132 0.0399Tas
k 10010-3 m2
pmin=1.6359fdp0.3/k0.3333
k 10010-3 m2
pmin=3.8666fdp0.3/k0.5
1
pmin
MPapmax
m/sk
MPaTas
-3
2
10 m dp
mmf
%
CH2079
1.02 32.5 MPa 54.6
10-3 m2 13.6%2900 m
2CH2079
Table 2Results comparison by using different design methods to CH2079 well
W T Bell
6.9 MPa
13.8 MPa
Conoco
4.5 MPa
20.1 MPa
2
Research of new underbalanced perforating
pressure design method
2.1
D
esign ideas
5.48 MPa
21 MPa
23MPa
1 W. T. Bell
Conoco King
Colle
Behrmann
pmax pmin
prec=0.8pmax+0.2pmin
Sw 50%
120
prec=0.2pmax+0.8pmin
2
pmax pmin
pmax
pmin pmax
pmin pmax
prec=0.8pmax
3
4
80%
80%
2.2
R
estrict condition of reasonable underbalanced
perforating pressure
2.2.1
2.2.2
0.8
prec 0.8ptubmax
4
prec MPaptubmax
MPa
2.3
R
esearch of optimal underbalanced perforating
pressure collation
2.3.1
2010 3 32 2
pmax=pp 0.2ph 5
pp
MPaph
MPa
2.3.2
C t 6
t MPaC
MPa
C t
3
Field application and effect analysis
032
032
1610 m
6.2 m
822.110-3 m2
0.869 g/cm3
21.6 mPas
032
1.5 MPa 30 MPa 0.23
1104 MPa 139.7 mm
7.72 mm N80 233 s/m
121
8.30 MPa
032
2008 1112 6 6
6
3
2 h32001 2008 6
3 2 MPa 1597~1603 m
2008 7 10
1494.5~1499 m
1.7 t2
4
3 032
Table 3Production performance of Hong032 well after perforating
/mm /MPa /MPa /t
h32007 4.5
4.8
11.5
29.4
29.4
h32010
/MPa
/MPa
8.3
8.0
/t
3.5
7.5
28.8
28.6
8.3
8.0
h32006 4.5
2.8
27.5
27.5
8.3
8.0
h32012
11.5 14.0
29.4
29.3
8.3
8.0
h32009
5.2
7.2
29.8
29.5
8.3
8.0
h32008
4.2
6.2
26.1
26
8.3
7.0
4
Table 4Production comparison by using traditional and new design methods
/MPa
/MPa /t
2
2
1.7
/t
/d
21.6
126
h32001
T2k1
h32012
T2k1
8.3
8.0
28.6
295.4
12
h32013
T2k1
14.4
30.5
h32010
T2k1
8.3
8.0
28.6
787.4
38
032 6
7 d
References:
1 . M. 3 .
2008-06293-326.
WAN Renpu, XIONG Youming. Advanced well completion
engineeringM. 3th edition. Beijing: Petroleum Industry
Press, 2008-06: 293-326.
2BEHRMANN L A. Underbalance criteria for minimum
perforation damageJ. SPE DC1996,113: 173-177.
4
Conclusions