Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
CONIUM MACULATUM L.
by Thomas Larsson,
a literature work in Pharmacognosy C,
Department of Medicinal chemistry,
Uppsala University, 2004.
Supervisor: Lars Bohlin.
1. Abbreviations
BBB
C(integer), e.g. C(5)
C-integer, e.g. C-5
14
C
CNS
E
et al.
IM
SARs
2. Wordlist
The word in question will not be included in the list, if it is written only once and
described in the text. If it can be visualized, e.g. hypersalivation (hyper: over,
exaggerated plus salivation), it will not be included either. If the word is
underlined in the text it means that one can find it in this list.
agonal
amniotic fluid
anodyne
arthrogryposis
asphyctic
biopsy
biotransformation
carpal
chorea
cleft palate
clonic
clonus
congenital
cyanosis
cyanotic
depressor
diurnal
encephalopathy
etiology
extensor
fasciculation
gestation
gout
histological
histology
hypermetria
in utero
joint
lateral
lead compound
lethargy
mandibular
mandible
mericarp
metacarpophalangic
joints
myoglobinuria
nictitating
membranes
palate
patellar reflex
phrenic nerve
placentation
polyphagous
postnatal
postpartum
prenatal
pressor effect
recumbency
rhabdomyolysis
scoliosis
sequela
sequelae
teratogenic
tonic
torticollis
vasoconstriction
vasomotor center
before birth
an agent that raises blood pressure.
lying down
disintegration or dissolution of muscle, associated with
excretion of myoglobin in the urine
lateral (sideway) deviation of the backbone, caused by
congenital or acquired abnormalities of the vertebrae,
mucles and nerves.Treatment is with spinal braces, and
in cases of severe deformity, surgical correction
by fusion or osteotomy is done.
any disorder or pathological condition that results from
a preceeding disease or accident.
plural form of sequela
adjective of teratogen, any substance, agent or process
that induces the formation of developmental
abnormalities in a fetus.
here: marked by continuous tension (contraction).
wryneck; an irresistable turning movement of the head
that becomes more persistent, so that eventually the
head is held continually to one side.
a decrease in the diameter of the blood vessels,
especially arteries. This results from activation of the
vasomotor center in the brain, which brings
about contraction of the muscular walls of the arteries
and hence an increase in blood pressure.
a collection of nerve cells in the medulla oblongata that
receives information from sensory receptors in the
circulatory system, and brings about reflex changes in
the rate of heartbeat and in the diameter of blood
vessels, so that blood pressure can be adjusted. The
vasomotor center also receives impulses from
elsewhere in the brain, so that emotion (such as fear)
may also influence the heart rate and blood pressure.
The center works through vasomotor nerves of the
sympathetic and parasympathetic systems.
Sources: The Bantam Medical Dictionary, 2000; Biology of Plants, Raven et al.,
1992; International Dictionary of Medicine and Biology Vol 1 and 3, 1986;
Dorlands Illustrated Medical Dictionary, 2000.
3. Introduction
Conium maculatum (hemlock, poison hemlock) is a very common and worldwide
plant species. It is one of the most toxic plants known [Vetter, 2004]. Poison
hemlock is native to Europe and western Asia and has been brought in America
and Oceania as an ornamental plant [Lpez et al., 1999 (1)], although in other
countries, for example Norway the plant have been introduced through the
transport of grain [Vetter, 2004 (2)].
The old Roman name of C. maculatum was Cicuta, but this name was later
occupied to another near related umbelliferous plant, Cicuta virosa L., (water
hemlock) by Gesner, 1541. Then Linnaeus gave its classical Greek name Conium
maculatum. Its generic name was derived from the Greek word Konas, which
means to whirl about, since consumption of the plant causes ataxia, tremor and
convulsions. The specific name (maculatum) is a Latin word, which means
spotted and refers to its very characteristic browninsh-reddish spots of the stem
[Vetter, 2004].
The English name hemlock can be little confusing since there are several different
hemlocks, see chapter 4, Botanical characterization. therefore the Latin name
Conium maculatum will be used mostly throughout this article.
However, water hemlock, Cicuta virosa, is also toxic to animals and humans and
a brief description of this plant and its active substances will be given later in this
text. As with many other toxic plants which cause episodic poisoning incidents,
they biosynthesize and accumulate compounds that provide a protective function
against predation or a competitive advantage relative to other plants and
microorganisms. These bioactive compounds have such serious effects on animals
when consumed; they are also a threat to the livestock producers. This threat has
decreased much the last few decades because of better equipment and techniques
to isolate and identify these compounds. By changing the dose of the bioactive
compound, the effect may be changed and could be manipulated to yield maybe
even beneficial results [James et. al, 2004].
There are many plant genera which contain piperidine alkaloids that fulfill the
teratogenic structural requirements, for example Conium, Nicotiana, Lupinus,
Lobelia, Pinus, Punica, Dubosia, Sedum, Withania, Carica, Hydrangea, Dichroa,
Cassia, Prosopis, Genista, Ammondendron, Liparia, Collidium, and others. Many
of them show structural similarity to known piperidine teratogens, this suggests
that some of the piperidine alkaloids in these plants may be teratogenic [Bunch et
al., 1992 (13)].
4. Botanical characterization
4.1. Physical description, habitats etc.
Conium maculatum L., a member of Apiaceae (formerly Umbelliferae) of
ryzomal plants, the carrot family [Vetter, 2004], is an annual, biennial or in
favourable conditions perennial plant, usually 120-180 cm. high. During the first
year of growth C. maculatum reaches 45 cm height forming dense stands around
the parent plants. The second year new plants grow from rosettes, with larger
leaves which are dark green, bisected, triangular and glabrous [Lpez et al., 1999
(3)]. The root is long, forked, tuberous, pale yellow and reminds about a carrot.
The stem is mottled with irregular purple spots, is erect, bright green and slightly
ridged, much branched above and hollow. The leaves are fern-like [James et al.,
2004], numerous, alternate, long-stalked and tripinnate (which means that they are
divided along the midrib into opposite pairs of leaflets which in turn are divided
and subdivided) [Vetter, 2004]. Its flowers are white, grouped in umbels, which
are small and numerous and have a terminal position, with 12-16 rays per umbel.
It produces a large number of green fruits, 2 to 3 mm long and about 2 mm wide,
grayish at maturity and formed by two closed mericarps [Lpez et al., 1999 (46)]. The fruit is a broadly ovoid and is composed of two greyish-brown seeds with
five wavy, longitudinal ridges. The petals of the small flowers are white and the
stamens of the flowers are longer than the petals and have white anthers. The
inflorescence is produced mainly from June to September. At germination the
cotyledons are narrow and lanceolate, the first true leaves have two or more
leaflets along an axis and are hairless. The plant has a bitter taste and the odour
reminds about a mouse. Where plants are numerous, the odour can be very
pervasive. The seeds or fruits do not a have very marked odour, but if crushed or
mixed with an alkali as potassium hydroxide solution, the same characteristic,
odour of mouse urine is produced.
Because of the large seed production, it may dominate small areas with a high
density of plants and encroach on alfalfa fields, grass pastures and meadows
(probably because of the rich nitrogen level in these plants). The seeds are nondormant [Lpez et al., 1999 (7,8,10)].
4.2. Other hemlocks and Apiaceaces
It should be noted that water hemlock (Cicuta virosa) is a different yet related
toxic plant that may be more lethal than poison hemlock (C. maculatum). Water
hemlock produces a C(17) polyacetylene neurotoxin termed cicutotoxin which
produces direct brain-neural injury through the induction of convulsions. Since
this group also is poisonous I will touch them briefly here.
Figure 2. Cicuta virosa L., water hemlock, a near related plant to C. maculatum
Compare with fig. 1.
Eastern hemlock, Tsuga canadensis (L.) Carr, and mountain hemlock, Tsuga
heterophylla, belong to the family Pinaceae, are thereof very distant relatives to
C. maculatum. Clapham et al. stated that there are some 43 genera of Apiaceae
throughout Europe and that these can be grouped into various tribes or subtribes,
depending on their taxonomic similarities. Apiaceae consists of annual or
perennial herbs, rarely shrubs, many of which are strong smelling [Dodds et al.,
1999 (11)].
In an experiment made by Dodds et al., extracts from 33 species representing 32
genera of Apiaceae were screened for antifeedant activity against the field slug,
Deroceras reticulatum, of those 22 triggered nervous activity in the slug ofactory
nerve preparation. Intensity of response differed with plant species, but extracts of
Conium maculatum, Coriandrum sativum (coriander) and Petroselinum crispum
(parsley), seemed to be both the most neuroactive and antifeedant, when
incorporated in a standard food [Dodds et al., 1999]. For a more detailed list of
the 33 species examined, the reader is recommended to see the article of Dodds et
al., see the reference list. Conium is a close relative to the genus Physospermum,
but the latter was unable to to trigger any activity in the electrophysiological
preparation. A possible explanation for this divergence could be that they are
found in completely different habitats. Conium is living in damp areas such as
open woods or river verges, whereas Physospermum generally grows in grass
verges [Dodds et al., 1999 (11)]. Since mollusks need moist conditions to prevent
desiccation, it seems likely that Conium is more exposed for the slug, which
therefore need some form of defence, in this case antifeedant chemicals released
through the leaves. This study shows, as well as Garraway has stated, that the
most neuroactive extracts were also evidently antifeedants. Electrophysiological
techniques can then give a valuable indication of the antifeedant potential of
naturally occuring substances [Dodds et al., 1999 (12)].
Acute
Chronic
Figure 3. Coniine
(2-propylpiperidine)
Figure 4. Coniceine
(2n-propyl-1-piperidine)
OH
Figure 5. N-methylconiine
(1-methyl-2-propylpiperidine)
Figure 6. Conhydrine
(2-(1-hydroxypropyl)-piperidine)
HO
N
Figure 7. Pseudoconhydrine
((5-hydroxypropyl)-piperidine)
Figure 8. Conhydrinone
((1-oxo-propyl)-piperidine)
HO
N
N
Figure 9. N-methylpseudoconhydrine
((5-hydroxy-1-methyl-2-propyl)-piperidine)
O
O
HOOC
A large width in the outcome regarding the alkaloid content, both qualitatively
and quantitatively have been found, depending on different researchers have not
used exactly the same method, which stage one study and which organ. Other
parameters which had an effect on the alkaloid concentration was rain (give an
increase of -coniceine level in fruits and flowers) and temperature [Lpez et al.,
1999 (27,30)]; even the diurnal concentration varied in the alkaloids [Lpez et al.,
1999 (17)]. The quantity of alkaloid were the twice during the sunny seasons
compared to cloudy seasons. As the fruits ripen, the alkaloid content increase, and
this also depends upon the soil moisture and its exposure to the sun. Since green
fruits contains more alkaloids than mature fruits and seeds, the level of alkaloids
in fruits reaches its peak while ripening, but reduces near maturity. The
concentrations of coniine and coniceine are found in similar degrees in cloudy
summers, while coniine is most prevalent during dry summers (27). Lpez et al.
have detected a significant increase in the alkaloid concentration of C. maculatum
on nitrogen fertilized soils [Lpez et al., 1999].
Experiments made by Leete has demonstrated that coniine is derived from acetic
acid [Lpez et al., 1999 (31)] by labelling the 1-C atom with the 14C isotope. This
result indicated that coniine is formed from an eight-carbon poly--keto acid (see
Fig. 11), produced by the combination of four acetate units. Obviously is coniceine a precursor of coniine and the other hemlock substances, but the
knowledge of the eight-carbon compound which is converted to the former
alkaloid is still like a black box [Vetter, 2004].
6.3. The polyacetylenes of Cicuta virosa
OH
OH
Figure 12. Cicutoxin, the main substance in Cicuta virosa (water hemlock)
( 8,10,12-Heptadec-triene-4,6-diyne-1,14-diol).
The major toxic substance of water hemlock (Cicuta virosa L.), is cicutoxin,
which belongs to a class of conjugated polyacetlylenes. It is assumed to be
produced from oleic acid in the biotransformation pathway which involves
oxidation and decarboxylation reactions [Uwai et al., 2000 (32)]. The citutoxin
contains the following functional groups: (i) a hydroxyl group and an allylic
hydroxyl group at C-1 and C-14, respectively, (ii) a diacetylene group, and (iii) an
all-E-triene group conjugated with the diacetylene. Cicutoxin is known to act
directly on the CNS, and is responsible for tonic and clonic convulsions and
respiratory paralysis [Uwai et al., 2000 (33)]. Despite cicutoxin is a severe
convulsant compound, its mechanism and structure-activity relationships (SARs)
is little known because of its chemical instability. To be able to comprehend the
features of these type of substances, it is necessary to study the principal
structural properties for the toxicity of polyacetylenes. Additionally, these studies
can very well lead to better understanding of the reaction mechanisms and give
information when developing new anticonvulsant drugs.
7. Biological activity
7.1. General
The piperidine toxins from the Conium (and also Lupinus and Nicotioana) species
induce cleft palate and contracture skeletal malformations in livestock, as was
mentioned above [James et al., 1992 (14)]. Different chemical structures of the
piperidine toxins from each plant lead to different toxic potencies [James et al.,
2004 (34)]. These differences are important in the mechanisms of action, such as
reduction of fetal movement and fetal malpositioning [James et al., 2004 (15)].
The induced cleft palates by toxic plants in goats look closely like the cleft palates
induced in humans [James et al., 2004 (35,36)]. The similarity between goats and
humans in this case is also useful as a model for histological comparisons of the
prenatal- and postnatal-repaired cleft palate and comparison of craniofacial
growth and development. This is a very good congenital model to study the
etiology of cleft palate in humans and develop fetal surgical techniques in utero.
The most of the discovered biomedical applications from these plants today
derives from their relationship with similar conditions in humans [James et al.,
2004 (15,35-38). Conium alkaloids may also cross the placenta and produce a
similar sedative and anesthetic effect on the fetus as on the dam [Bunch et al.,
1992].
7.2. Symptoms of poisoning of Conium
When this group of piperidine alkaloid-containing plants is involved the
symptoms of poisoning are similar in all livestock production. The initial
symptoms includes nervousness, depression, grinding of the teeth, frothing
around the mouth, relaxation of the nictitating membrane of the eye, frequent
urination and defecation and lethargy. Then eventually follows muscular
weakness, tremors and fasciculations, ataxia, collapse, respiratory failure and
death [James, 2004]. Signs of toxicosis may appear as early as 1 h after ingestion
and get worse the next 24-48 h even if further ingestion does not occur. However,
if the animal does not die within this time frame it generally recovers completely.
Coniine and -coniceine from Conium and anabasine from N. tabacum used
identical birth defects in cattle, pigs, sheep, and goats [James et al., 2004 (15,3944)].
7.3. Pharmacological actions
Hemlock alkaloids have been found to have an action on spinal cord reflexes and
depress autonomic activity and in large quantities cause neuromuscular blockade.
This action may lead to respiratory depression and anoxic brain injury, with
eventual death following within 24 hr of ingestion. Despite rhabdomyolysis and
assosiated acute renal failure have been recorded regarding hemlock poisoning,
no direct toxic effects have been described concerning the liver or kidneys.
The action of poison hemlock of the central nervous system seems to play a minor
role, as the senses seemingly remains intact in humans and in animals.
Since stimulation of the sensory cells does not result in muscle contraction, there
is an increased resistance in the sensory cells [de Boer, 1950 (45)]. The influence
the hemlock alkaloids have on the heart is of minor importance. After preliminary
stimulation the sympathetic and parasympathetic ganglia become paralysed, the
same reaction takes place with the respiratory medullary center, which result in an
respiratory arrest and asphyctic agonal convulsions. de Boer has studied the
peripheral vasoconstriction effect of hemlock, and recorded varying results in
frogs and a pressor effect in mammals. When coniine and opium were combined,
the summarised result was that opium caused an emphasized effect of the
paralysing action of coniine, when coniine decreased the anesthetic effect of
opium. The character of the paralysis was more like the ascending type [de Boer,
1950].
Since the piperidines behaves in a specific way and are teratogenic they also
fulfill specific criteria for teratogenesis [James et al., 2004 (39)]. The structural
characteristics of these piperidines need to be determined and their main
differences outlined to be able to find out their mechanism of action, as fetal
movement and malpositioning. The birth defects caused by Conium, Lupinus and
Nicotiana spp., are the same and their biological activities occur by a similar
mechanism of action [James et al., 2004 (15)]. As usual with biological active
compounds one use to characterise the toxicity into acute and chronic forms.
Sollman postulated that the peripheral actions of coniine are similar to those of
nicotine, but it produces more prounounced paralysis of the central nervous
system and of the skeletal muscle nerve endings [de Boer, 1950 (46)]. de Boer
confirmed 1950 that coniine had similar activity as strychnine [de Boer, 1950].
One of the reasons why C. maculatum could not be used as a medicine was that
different preparations varied too much in their potency. Fairbairn and Challen
have found one possible explanation to the differing potency; alkaloidal content
and composition from extracts differed widely dependent on the climatic
conditions and even which time of the day the plants were collected [Bowman
and Sanghvi, 1962 (27)]. Therefore the study of the individual alkaloids
intensified. The four main alkaloids are coniine, -coniceine, N-methylconiine
and conhydrine. Conhydrine occurs in the smallest proportions and has the
weakest pharmacological action [Bowman and Sanghvi, 1962 (47)].
The most distinctive action of the three other hemlock alkaloids plus nicotine is
their ability, provided the dose is small, to inhibit the crossed extensor reflex and
the so called knee-jerk by an action potential in the spinal cord. The influence of
nicotine on the knee-jerk was first demonstrated by Schweitzer and Wright 1938
[Bowman and Sanghvi, 1962 (75)]. Since these effects also occured with small
doses, de Boers conclusion that the action of coniine was similar to that of
strychnine could not be confirmed. In fact, it was to the contrary: the actions of
the hemlock alkaloids and of strychnine were shown to be mutually antagonistic.
Since neurons in the spinal cord may both be inhibited and activated by the action
of hemlock, the mechanisms involved are a bit complicated. Both mephenesin and
strychnine are able to antagonise the depressant action of the alkaloids on the
patellar reflex. If the alkaloids initially stimulate inhibitory neurons rather than
blocking excitatory ones, the antagonistic relationship of the two substances may
1995]. The use of stimulants and large volumes of water have been suggested as
treatments against poisoned livestock. Among human beings treatment with
alcoholic beverages, tea and coffee has been suggested and also the induction of
vomit with a tablespoon of salt dissolved in warm waters, repeating this treatment
until the vomit is empty, keeping the victim laying down, resting, covered and
under medical control [Lpez et al., 1999 (54,57)]. The reasons to why not poison
by hemlock are more frequent are the plants mousy odor, bitter taste and
burning sensation of the mouth, throat and abdomen on ingestion [Frank et al.,
1995 (61)]. A poisoned victim from hemlock stated that the plant tasted like
carrot tops [Frank et al., 1995].
Survivors of poisoning have in the most cases not shown permanent sequelae and
have neither shown any long-term damage of the liver nor kidneys. For
nonsurvivors brain death often occurs, without serious extraneural losses, thereby
making them possible multiorgan donors (read more about this at next chapter,
Hemlock victims as organ donators.
some clues which type of bondings there are between the alkaloids and the
nicotinic receptor. It is obvious that the nitrogen atom play a major role (since it is
apparent in all of the molecules), and the similarity between C. maculatums
alkaloids (piperidine ring and a propyl side chain in 2-position), indicates that this
is of importance.
Keeler and Balls, fed pregnant cows with structural analogues of coniine to
compare structural relationships to their teratogenic effects. The results indicated
that the piperidine alkaloids must fulfil certain chemical structural criteria to be
regarded as teratogenic. These data suggested that the piperidine alkaloids with
either a saturated ring or a single double bond in the ring with a side chain of at
least three carbon atoms in length adjacent to the nitrogen atom, were potential
teratogens [James et al., 2004 (60)]. Those alkaloids with a double bond adjacent
to the nitrogen atom are more toxic than either the fully saturated or N-methyl
derivatives [James et al., 2004 (34)].
10. History
10.1. The trial and execution of Socrates
A cocktail of extract from Conium maculatum, the poison hemlock, mixed with
opium have been reported to be the lethal poison which the Greek philosopher
Socrates was condemned to drink in the year 399 B.C. [de Boer, 1950]. Socrates
symptoms from he drank the cup to he passed away was described by Plato, who
also was a pupil to Socrates. The trial and execution of Socrates is by many
estimated to be the next most famous execution in the worlds history, next after
the crucifixion of Jesus. Jesus life, trial and execution have been documented very
well, and is world wide known, but what do we know about Socrates and his
theology and philosophy (since I bring the trial and execution of Socrates up here,
it may be interesting to know why he was sentenced to death)?
The trial of Socrates in 399 B.C. confronted an old desire for restful social life
and a new idea of human dignity, in a legal system where trial by jury was in its
infancy in a primitive, experimental stage. Socrates postulated to his defense, that
his claim on free inquiry would make him to an official benefactor and not any
criminal. He failed to convince the jury of 501 delegates and was found guilty and
sentenced to death [Brumbaugh, 1989].
Socrates was prosecuted by a younger man named Meletus. His charge against
Socrates was impiety. The more specified arguments that Socrates was supposed
to be impious were
1. Socrates did not recognise the gods of the city.
2. He invented new divine things.
3. He was charged to corrupt the youth.
There are different reports about the defence Socrates gave about the charges
against him. Some sources have said him to be silent during the trial, but
Xenophons and Platos statements are to the contrary. Xenophon was a famous
soldier at that time and a friend of Socrates and have published a report named
Memorabilia. [Brumbaugh, 1989]. Socrates speech was perceived by many to
have been quite haughty and proud. Xenophon characterise it as megalegoria,
which can be translated as big talk [Brickhouse and Smith, 2002].
Xenophon interpreted Socrates behaviour at the trial as he did not want to die in
old ages and pain and decided to end his life as a martyr. He also concluded that
Socrates had religious scruples about suicide and thereof he provoked the court
[Brumbaugh, 1989]. This Xenophon explains as Socrates big talk at his trial. In
Platos version, Socrates claims that it is his duty as a defendant to instruct and
persuade the jury. The big talk in Socrates defense is by many scholars only the
To be able to get a picture of why Socrates was accused for not recognise their
gods, one need to understand a little of the situation in Greece at that time and
Socrates philosophy. Since this is neither any history nor philosophy thesis, it
will only be touched very briefly here.
The Athenian expansion during the fifth century B.C. collided to some degree
with Sparta and its allies, and for thirty years hot and cold warfaring occured
alternately, which ended with the total defeat of Athens in 404 B.C. Then Sparta
supported an interim council of representatives of the conservative group of a
party named The Thirty Tyrants took over the government [de Boer, 1950]. The
more active democratic leaders fled from the city, and Critias, the leader of The
Thirty Tyrants, instituted a reign of terror. Since they were short of public
revenues, they took advantage by a law that the property of traitors could be
confiscated by the state. Wealthy foreign residents (and some others) could be
arrested and executed for treason after secret cross-examinations, and by that they
managed to keep the treasury solvent. Critisism of the reign was almost the same
as being quieted by assassination [Brumbaugh, 1989].
The most fundamental dogma of the Socratic theology is that the gods are truly
wise. Socrates reasoned, that wisdom guaranteed virtue, which followed that the
gods are completely virtuous. Socrates claims that humans get nothing good that
does not come from the gods.
This line of reasoning explains why Socrates found the ancient Greek myths who
were fighting with one another hard to believe, because disagreements would by
that logic reasoning not exist, and hence they should never fight. Moreover, the
gods would never, in Socratess view, do anything evil or harmful. This reasoning
was by many at this time seen like he questionized the ancient Greek mythology,
which seemed to be very fatal [Brickhouse and Smith, 2002].
pains of gout. However, in the 1760s, it began to be used to treat cancerous ulcers.
Only USA imported about 14,000 kg of seeds and 7,000 kg of dried leaves from
the drug. The tinctures and extracts were used because of their sedative, anodyne
and antispasmodic properties (in the case of asthma, epilepsy, whooping cough,
angina, chorea and stomach pains). The drug has to be given with meticulous
care; narcotic poisoning may result from internal use which can produce
paralysis. The use of C. maculatum in the medicine have been disputed. However,
it remains as a classic homeopathic agent with various uses [Vetter, 2004 (67)]. It
is known to be a long-acting remedy, it is especially of use against elderly people,
when the vital powers of the body are declining. It has also been used in the
treatment against a serious type of malignant tumour [Vetter, 2004].
During the 1800s and early 1900s the livestock industries developed rapidly in
western United States, and then the poisonous plants were soon discovered as a
source to economic loss for it. Much because of these losses, the U.S. Department
of Agriculture initiated research on the effects the poisonous plants caused on the
livestock. So far they had mostly concentrated their research to identify the
specific poisonous plants, with only limited efforts to identify plants toxins. After
the World War II more advanced and sophisticated scientific equipment were
developed and facilitated the identification of plant toxicants and the mechanisms
of their actions [James et al., 2004 (51,68)]. At this time, members of the ranching
communities asked that research be initiated on a number of problems causing
great economic loss to producers.
12. Discussion
appear to be very complicated, and the alkaloids of Conium maculatum have only
been known for a few decades.
There are four drug and medicinal related questions which raises when one
studying Conium maculatum:
1. Has coniine etc. a sufficiently potent curarizing action to justify its use in
human surgery (there are of course other interesting biological activities to
study, like the potency for skeletal deformities, but this seems too difficult to
see at this stage how it can be used in drug development)?
2. If the side effects of the crude compounds (coniine, -coniceine, etc.) are too
serious, can they serve as lead comounds for research of muscle relaxing
drugs?
3. When the reaction mechanisms are known, is it possible to develop some form
of antidote or prophylaxis against poisoning of C. maculatum?
4. Why does the susceptibility among the species vary so much in teratogenicity
against poison hemlock?
Or put it in another way: Is there any possibility to separate the unwanted side
effects from the desired effects?
One good starting point could be to study those animals which have developed
resistance against C. maculatum, and see if they have any special enzymes, or
biotransformation systems or sequestering the compounds for example. One
another could be to look at the structure-activity relationship, SAR, between the
different species bioactive compounds which are responsible for e.g. teratogenic
skeletal malformation, and see what they have in common.
As mentioned above in the text, if the victim can survive the first critical period of
poisoning, the chance to recover without any further injuries is relatively big, so
more research in this area is needed to unravel the connection between cause and
effect.
14. Acknowledgements
I want to thank my supervisor Lars Bohlin.
15. References
When the reference is enclosed in square brackets, it means that it can be found in
this list. If it is followed by a number within parantheses, it can be found in next
chapter, Further readings.
The Bantam Medical Dictionary; 3rd revised ed., The Editors of Market House
Books Ltd, Bantam Books, 2000.
Boer, J. de; Arch. Int. Pharmacodyn., 83: 473-490, 1950.
Bowman W. C. and Sanghvi I. S.; Pharmacological actions of hemlock (Conium
maculatum) alkaloids; J. Pharm. Pharmacol., 15, 1-25, 1962.
17. Panter K.E., Keeler R.F., Buck W. and Shupe J.L.; Toxicity and teratogenicity
of in swine. Toxicon 20 (Suppl. 3): 333336, 1983.
18. Capithorne B.; Suspected poisoning of goats by hemlock (Conium
maculatum); Vet. Rec. 49: 10181019, 1937.
19. Jessup D., Boermans H. and Kock N; Toxicosis in tule elk caused by ingestion
of poison hemlock. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 9: 11731175, 1986.
20. Frank A. and Reed W.; Comparative toxicity of coniine, an alkaloid of
Conium maculatum (poison hemlock), in chickens, quails, and turkeys; Avian
Dis. 34: 433437, 1990.
21. Berenbaum R. and Harrison L.; Agonopterix alstroemeriana (Oecophoridae)
and other lepidopteran associates of poison hemlock (Conium maculatum) in
east central Illinois; Great Lakes Entomologist 27:1-5, 1994.
22. Nitao, J.K.; Tests for toxicity of coniine to a polyphagous herbivore, Heliothis
zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Environmental Entomology 16: 656663, 1987.
23. Crowden R.K., Harborne J.B.and Heywood V.H.; Chemosystematics of the
Umbelliferae a general survey, Phytochemistry 8: 1963-1984, 1969.
24. Hegnauer R.; Chemical patterns and relationships of Umbelliferae. In:
Heywood V.H., ed. The biology and chemistry of the Umbelliferae. London:
Academic Press, 267-277, 1971.
25. Nielsen B.E.; Coumarin patterns in the Umbelliferae. In: Heywood V.H., ed.
The biology and chemistry of the Umbelliferae. London: Academic Press, 325336, 1971.
26. Cromwell B.T.; the separation, micro-estimation and distribution of the
alkaloids of hemlock (Conium maculatum L.). Biochemical Journal 64: 259266, 1956.
27. Fairbairn J.W. and Challen S.B.; The alkaloids of hemlock (Conium
maculatum L.). Distribution in relation to the development of the fruit.
Biochemical Journal, 72: 556-561, 1959.
28. Panter K.E., Keeler R.F. and Baker D.; Toxicoses in livestock from the
hemlocks (Conium and Cicuta spp.). J. Anim. Sci. 66, pp. 24072413, 1988b.
29. The Merck Index, Merck and Co., Whitehouse Station, pp. 423424, 1996.
30. Leete E. and Adityachaudhury N.; Ibid., 6, 219, 1967.
31. Leete E.; J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 86, 2509, 1964.
32. Anet E.F.L.J., Silk M.H. and Trippett S.; Oenanthotoxin and Cicutoxin.
Isolation and Structures; J. Chem. Soc., 309-322, 1953.
33. Starreveld E. and Hope E.; Cicutoxin Poisoning. Neurology, 25: 730-734,
1975.
34. Panter K. E., Gardner D. R., Shea R. E., Molyneux R. J. and James L. F.;
Toxic and teratogenic piperidine alkaloids from Lupinus, Conium and
Nicotiana species. In Toxic Plants and Other Natural Toxicants; Garland, T.,
Barr, A. C., Eds.; CAB International: New York, pp 345-350, 1998.
35. Weinzweig J., Panter K. E., Pantaloni M., Spangenberger A., Harper J. S.,
Edstrom L.E., Gardner D. R. and Wierenga T.; The fetal cleft palate: I.
Characterization of a congenital model. Plastic Reconstr. Surg., 103: 419-428,
1999a.
36. Weinzweig J., Panter K. E., Pantaloni M., Spangenberger A., Harper J. S., Lui
F., James L.F. and Edstrom L. E.; The fetal cleft palate: II. Scarless healing
after in utero repair of a congenital model. Plastic Reconstr. Surg., 104: 13561364, 1999b.
37. Panter, K. E. and Keeler, R. F.; Induction of cleft palate in goats by Nicotiana
glauca during a narrow gestational period and the relation to reduction in fetal
movement. J. Nat.Toxins, 1: 25-32, 1992.
38. Panter K. E., Weinzweig J., Gardner D. R., Stegelmeier B. L. and James L. F.;
Comparison of cleft palate induction by Nicotiana glauca in goats and sheep.
Teratology, 61, 203-210, 2000.
39. Keeler R. F., Balls L. D. and Panter K. E.; Teratogenic effects of
Nicotianaglauca and concentration of anabasine, the suspect teratogen in
plants; Cornell Vet., 71, 47-53, 1981.
40. Keeler, R. F.; Coniine, a teratogenic principle from Conium maculatum
producing congenital malformations in calves; Clin. Toxicol., 7: 195-206,
1974.
41. Keeler, R. F. and Crowe, M. W. Teratogenicity and toxictiy of wild tree
tobacco, Nicotiana glauca in sheep. Cornell Vet., 74, 50-59, 1984.
42. Panter K.E., Keeler R.F. and Buck, W.; Congenital skeletal malformations
induced by maternal ingestion of Conium maculatum (poison hemlock) in
newborn pigs. Am. Vet. Res. 46: 20642066, 1985a.
43. Panter K. E., Keeler R. F. and Buck W. B.; Induction of cleft palate in
newborn pigs by maternal ingestion of poison-hemlock (Conium maculatum).
Am. J. Vet. Res., 46: 1368-1371, 1985b.
44. Panter K. E., Bunch T. D., Keeler R. F. and Sisson D. V.; Radio ultrasound
observations of the fetotoxic effects in sheep from ingestion of Conium
maculatum (poison-hemlock). Clin .Toxicol., 26: 175-187, 1988a.
45. Dixon W.E.; in Heffters Handbuch der Experimentellen Pharmakologie, Vol
II, Part 2, p. 701, 1924.
46. Sollman, 1975 Sollman T.; A Manual of Pharmacology; 8th ed., p. 467, 1957,
Philadelphia, Saunders.
47. von Oettingen W.F.; The Therapeutic Agents of the Pyrrole and Pyridine
Group, p. 85, Ann Arbor. Michigan: Edwards Brothers Inc., 1936.
48. Taverner D.; Brit. J. Pharmacol. 7, 655-664, 1952.
49. Bradley K., Easton W.M. and Eccles J.C.; Ibid., 122, 474-488, 1953.
50. Eccles J.C., Fatt P. and Koketzu K.; J. Physiol. (Lond.); 126: 524-562, 1954.
51. James L. F, Keeler R. F., Johnson A. E., Williams M. C., Cronin E. H. and
Olsen J.D.; Plants Poisonous to Livestock in the Western States;
AgricultureInformation Bulletin 415; U.S. Department of Agriculture:
Washington, DC, pp. 90, 1980.
52. Hulbert L. and Oehme F.W.; Conium maculatum (poison hemlock) In: Plants
Poisonous to Livestock, 3rd ed. Kansas State University Press, Kansas, 1981.
53. Everist S.; Umbelliferae. In: Poisonous Plants of Australia, 2nd ed. Angus and
Robertson Publishers, Sidney, pp. 717720, 1981.
54. Forsyth A.A.; Conium maculatum. In: British Poisonous Plants. Her Majesty's
Stationary Office, London, pp. 6869, 1968.
55. Galey F.D., Holstege D.M. and Fisher E.G.;. Toxicosis in dairy cattle exposed
to poison hemlock (Conium maculatum) in hay: isolation of Conium alkaloids
in plants, hay and urine; J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. 4, pp. 6064, 1992.
56. Hunt W. and Fosbinder R.; The anesthetic potency of some new
piperidinederivatives; Anesthesiology 1: 305311, 1940.
57. Agricultural Research Service; 22 Plants Poisonous to Livestock in the
Western States. Agriculture Information Bulletin No. 327. US Department of
Agriculture, Washington, pp. 4143, 1968.
58. Keeler R.F., Dell Balls, L., Shupe, J.L. and Ward Crowe, M.; Teratogenicity
and toxicity of coniine in cows, ewes, and mares. Cornell Vet. 70: 1926,
1980.
59. Keeler R.F.; Toxins an teratogens of higher plants. Lloydia, 38: 5686, 1975.
60. Keeler, R.F. and Balls, Dell L.; Teratogenic effects in cattle of Conium
maculatum and Conium alkaloids and analogues. Clin. Toxicol. 12: 4964,
1978.
61. Ober W.B.; Did Socrates die of hemlock poisoning? N. Y. State J. Med.,
77:254-258, 1977.
62. Lewin L.; Die Gifte in der Weltgeschichte.
63. Block, Enid; Hemlock Poisoning and the Death of Socrates. In: Thomas C.
Brickhouse and Nicholas D. Smith; The Trial and Execution of Socrates;
Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, 2002.
64. Simpson A. and Weiner C.; The Oxford English Dictionary, vol. 7. (second
ed.), Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1989.
65. Holm L.; World Weeds, Natural Histories and Distribution, Wiley, New York
p. 1129, 1997.
66. le Stragne R.; A History of Herbal Plants; Angus and Robertson, London,
1977.
67. Zdanevich V. and Belodubrovskaya A.; Conum maculatum chemical
composition, useful and harmful properties. Rastitelnye Resursy 33, 108-113,
1997.
68. James L. F.; History of USDA poisonous plant research; J. Nat. Toxins, 8: 326, 1999.
69. Howell E. and Mink I.; Viruses isolated from wild carrot and poison hemlock;
Plant Diseases 65: 277279, 1981.
70. Parsons T.; Hemlock poisoning in cattle; Veterinary Record 42: 669670,
1973. Noxious Weeds of Victoria. Inkata Press, Melbourne, Australia.
71. Panter E. and Keeler F.; Piperidine alkaloids of poison hemlock (Conium
maculatum). In: Cheeke, P.R., Editor; Toxicants of Plant OriginAlkaloids vol.
1; CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA, pp. 109132, 1989.
72. Bowman W. C. and Sanghvi, I. S. Pharmacological actions of hemlock
(Conium maculatum) alkaloids. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 15: 1-25, 1963.
73. Shepard, T. H.; Catalog of Teratogenic Agents, 9th ed.; The Johns Hopkins
University Press: Baltimore, MD, p 593, 1998.
74. del Castillo J. and Katz B.; J. Physiol. (Lond.), 128: 157-181, 1955.
75. Schweitzer A. and Wright S.; J. Physiol. Lond., 94: 136-147, 1938.