Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
ABSTRACT
The aim of this experiment is to determine the acid ionization constant or K a value of the weak
acid by using the titration method with sodium hydroxide solution and by measuring the pH value for the
weak acid. For the titration method, sodium hydroxide as a base solution was titrated into the solution of
weak acid drop by drop. The titration graph thus plotted against the pH value of the solution and the
volume of NaOH required to neutralize the weak acid solution in each titration is determined. The half
equivalence point and the equivalence point are also determined from the curve. During this experiment
too, the average molarity of the unknown acid solution used in the titration also must be calculated. For
the second experiment in which the measuring method is applied, the procedure begins with the
measurement step to determine the pH value for weak acid. The measurement was done for 3 and times
and the data was recorded after the pH values was no longer change against time. After that, further
calculations are conducted to determine the value for K a. According to the result obtained, the K a values
for both methods are close to the K a value of the acetic acid. Thus, the weak acid use is considered as
the acetic acid due to the nearest Ka value determined. However, the titration method shows that its K a
value is more nearest compared to the pH measurement method. The accuracy based on the K a value
also shows the higher percentage for titration method which is equal to 91.80 % while measurement
method only represented 70.0 % accuracy. As a conclusion, the titration method is more accurate to
determine the Ka value of the weak acid thus at the same time is very effective to determine the type of
acid used according to the Ka value compared to the pH measurement method.
2
INTRODUCTION
The Acid Ionizations Constant, Ka, is the equilibrium constant for the reaction in
which a weak acid is in equilibrium with its conjugate base in aqueous solution.
Notice that in the equilibrium expression below the concentration of water is not
included. This is because water is vastly in excess and the amount changes
negligibly on equilibrium being established. Ka can be thought of as a modified
equilibrium constant. For example,
HA(aq) + H2O(l) = H3O(aq) + A(aq)
Ka = [H3O(aq)][A(aq)] / [HA(aq)]
Therefore, the larger the value of Ka, the stronger is the acid. The value is
sometimes expressed as the logarithm of its reciprocal, called pKa. Therefore,
pKa = -log Ka
The smaller the values of pKa, the acid become stronger. Ka is a better measure of
the strength of an acid than pH because adding more water to the acid solution will
not change the value of the equilibrium constant Ka, but it will change the H+ ion
concentration on which pH depends. The current investigation set out to test the
application of the above described method for determining the Ka of an unknown
acid species. The current experiment was designed to employ the use of a pH
meter incorporated into the titration of an aqueous solution of a measured amount
of unknown acid HA. The data were graphed and analyzed to determine the
equivalence point and, thereby, the half way volume and Ka of the unknown acid as
described above.
OBJECTIVE
To determine the acid ionizations constant, Ka, of weak acid by titration with sodium
hydroxide (NaOH) and measuring the pH of the weak acid.
THEORY
All weak acids in solution exist in equilibrium. The equilibrium is between the
molecular form of the acid and ionized form of the acid.
HA(aq) + H2O(l) = H3O(aq) + A(aq)
For all weak acid this equilibrium lies predominantly on the left. Most of the acid is
in molecular form. This result in all weak acids having an equilibrium constant that
is less than 1. The largest equilibrium constant is approximately 102. The smallest
is about 1013. The equilibrium expression for all monoprotic weak acid is:
Ka = [H3O(aq)][A(aq)] / [HA(aq)]
Where Ka is the acid ionization constant.
Ka can be determined in a variety of ways. The most common is by measuring the
pH of a solution of the weak acid. This methods work fine monoprotic acids, but for
polyprotic acids, the result is a combination of the various Ka for each acidid
protons. Titration is a method that works well for either monoprotic or polyprotic
acids. Measuring the pH at various point in the titration and plotting the pH versus
volume of the base added gives an indication of the Ka for the acid.
Sample calculation:
Initial
Chang
e
Final
HA
0.1 M
-3.0x103 M
H3O
0
+3.0x103 M
A
0
+3.0x103 M
(0.1 - 3.0x103) M
3.0x103 M
3.0x103 M
Ka = [H3O(aq)][A(aq)] / [HA(aq)]
= (3.0x103)( 3.0x103) / (0.1 - 3.0x103)
= 9.3 x 105
This is a fairly weak acid
APPARATUS
250 ml beaker
Burette
Pipette
Magnetic bar
REAGENT:
Sodium hydroxide
40 ml Unknown acid
Distilled water
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE
6
RESULTS
Volume of NaOH
(mL)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Titration 1
pH Titration 1
pH Titration 2
pH Titration 3
3.72
3.90
4.29
4.32
4.43
4.63
4.80
4.95
5.15
5.50
6.09
10.77
11.19
11.33
11.45
11.53
3.75
3.93
4.20
4.32
4.48
4.63
4.77
4.94
5.14
5.43
6.29
10.73
11.11
11.28
11.39
11.55
3.69
3.93
4.16
4.30
4.42
4.55
4.70
4.75
5.02
5.21
6.06
10.74
11.13
11.32
11.42
11.49
6
4
2
0
0
10
12
14
16
12
14
16
mL NaOH
Titration 2
6
4
2
0
0
8
mL NaOH
Titration 3
10
6
4
2
0
0
8
mL NaOH
10
12
14
16
9
SAMPLE CALCULATIONS
Equivalence point
(mL)
Half equivalence
point (mL)
pH at half
equivalence point
Titration 1
Titration 2
Titration 3
10.19
10.02
10.20
5.10
5.01
5.10
4.65
4.85
4.65
Titration 1
Equivalence point = 10.19mL
Half equivalence point = 10.19/2 = 5.10mL
The pH vaue corresponding to 5.10mL is 4.65
pKa = pH = 4.65 at half equivalence point.
pKa = pH
Ka = 10-pKa
=10-4.65
= 2.24 x 10-5
10
Titration 2
Equivalence point = 10.02mL
Half equivalence point = 10.02/2 = 5.01mL
The pH vaue corresponding to 5.01mL is 4.85
pKa = pH = 4.85 at half equivalence point.
pKa = pH
Ka = 10-pKa
=10-4.85
=1.41 x 10-5
Titration 3
Equivalence point = 10.20mL
Half equivalence point = 10.20/2 = 5.10mL
The pH value corresponding to 5.10mL is 4.65
pKa = pH = 4.65 at half equivalence point.
pKa = pH
Ka = 10-pKa
=10-4.65
= 2.24 x 10-5
11
The average Ka value from titration 1, 2, and 3.
Average of Ka value=
3
5
1. 96 10
1.8 105 .
Titration 1
No of moles of NaOH :
0.1 M 10.19 mL
1 10 L
1 mL
=
CH3COOH(aq)+ NaOH(aq)
NaCH3COO(aq)+ H2O(l)
From the equation above 1 mole of CH3COOH was neutralized by 1 mole of NaOH.
3
=
Molarity of CH3COOH :
1 mole CH 3 COOH
1 mole NaOH
3
1.02 10
CH3COOH.
12
M=
10.19 mLsolution
1 103 L
= 0.1 M
TITRATION 2
No of moles of NaOH :
0.1 M 10.02 mL
1 103 L
1mL
1.00 103 mol NaOH
1 mole CH 3COOH
1 mole NaOH
3
1.00 10
CH3COOH.
Molarity of CH3COOH :
3
M=
3
10.02 mL solution
110 L
= 0.1 M
TITRATION 3
13
No of moles of NaOH :
0.1 M 10.20 mL
1 10 L
1 mL
1.02 103 mol NaOH
1 mole CH 3 COOH
1 mole NaOH
Molarity of CH3COOH :
M=
3
10.20 mLsolution
1 10 L
= 0.1 M
14
Determination of the Ka from the initial concentration and pH of weak acid solution
Method 2
Titration 1
3.72
Initial pH
Titration 2
3.75
Titration 3
3.69
Titration 1
The pH of 0.1 M weak acid solution is 3.72 at 25 .
pH = 3.72
[H3O+] =
pH
10
103.72
=1.91
10
HA
Initial:
0.10M
Change:
-1.91
Equilibrium:
(0.10-1.91
[ A ]
[ HA ]
[ H 30 ]
Ka=
H 2O
H3O+
A-
103 M
103 )M
+1.91
1.91
103 M
1.91
103 M
15
Ka=
(0.101.91 10 ) M
105
Titration 2
The pH of 0.1 M weak acid solution is 3.75 at 25 .
pH = 3.75
[H3O+] =
10 pH
3.75
10
=1.78
104
HA
Initial:
0.10M
Change:
-1.78
Equilibrium:
(0.10-1.78
H 2O
A-
104 M
+1.78
104 )M
[ A ]
[ HA ]
[ H 30 ]
Ka=
Ka=
H3O+
(0.101.78 10 )M
= 3.17
107
1.78
104 M
1.78
104 M
16
Titration 3
The pH of 0.1 M weak acid solution is 3.69 at 25
pH = 3.69
[H3O+] =
10 pH
103.69
=2.04
104
HA
Initial:
0.10M
Change:
-2.04
Equilibrium:
(0.10-2.04
H3O+
H 2O
104 M
4
10
)M
2.04
(0.102.04 10 ) M
= 4.17
Average Ka value :
+2.04
[ A ]
+
[ HA ]
[ H 30 ]
Ka=
Ka=
A-
10
10
2.04
10
17
5
Average Ka=
= 1.26 x
105
The average Ka value of the unknown acid is nearest to that acetic acid of 1.8
Accuracy =
1.96 10
100
5
1.80 10
= 91.80%
Accuracy =
1.26 105
100
1.80 105
= 70.00%
10
18
DISCUSSION
Through this experiment, the acid ionizations constant (K a) of a weak acid is determined by the
two methods. Firstly, is by the titration with sodium hydroxide solution and next is by measuring the pH
value of that weak acid. For the first experiment by using titration method, Titration 1 shows the K a value
equal to 2.24 x 10-5, Titration 2 shows Ka value equal to 1.41 x 10 -5 and Titration 3 shows the K a value to
be in 2.24 x 10-5. From that result, only Titration 1 and Titration 3 shows the same K a value but Titration 2
shows the significant difference. From the observation, this difference value of K a is due to that the initial
pH value for the acid is not same to each other for all three titration at the beginning of the experiment. As
a result, the equivalence point for these three titrations will be differing to each other thus affected the
calculation to determined Ka value. Due to that thing, to obtain only one accurate K a value to represent the
titration method, it should be taken in average, which is equal to1.96 x 10 -5. From the Table 1, this value is
closest to the Ka value of acetic acid.
For the second experiment in which the method is by measuring the pH value of the weak acid,
the result for Ka values show the significant difference compared to the titration method. Although the
initial pH value for the weak acid use is the same with the previous titration experiment, the K a values
determined is not same. According to the result obtained, the K a value for initial pH of weak acid which
respect to 3.72 is 3.72 x 10-5, pH value equal to 3.75 is respect to 3.17 x 10 -7 and pH value equal to 3.69
is respect to 4.17 x 10-7 of Ka value. The average value also must be considered in this experiment since
19
all the Ka values is not constant. For this second experiment, the average K a value is equal to 1.26 x 10 -5,
thus closest also to the acetic acid.
Because of that, the weak acid use can be considered as the acetic acid since both titration and
pH calculation method shows the nearest value to this acid according to the Table 1. However, the
titration method is more accurate and effective since its shows the nearest K a value to the acetic acid.
Besides, the accuracy calculated for the titration method base on the K a value of acetic acid shows the
larger percentage which is equal to 91.80% compared to the accuracy for the pH calculation method
which is equal to 70.0 %. Specifically, the difference of the accuracy between these two methods is due to
that in the pH calculation method, the molarity of weak acid is assumed to be fully decreases during the
equilibrium point when ionization takes places and the molarity of conjugate ion will fully increasing at
another hand.
This can be seen from the equation use in the pH calculation method:
HA
Initial:
0.10M
Change:
-1.91
Equilibrium:
(0.10-1.91
H 2O
H3O+
A-
+
0
103 M
10
+1.91
3
)M
1.91
103 M +
10
1.91
1.91
103 M
3
10
Thus, the assumption for the fully changes of that molarity thus will affect the further calculation to
determine the Ka value since in this method; Ka values are dependent to the changes of acid molarity.
Oppositely for the titration method, the K a values are determine according to the pH value of the
half equivalence point occurs at the graph plotted. At this point, concentration of [HA] is equal to the
concentration of conjugate base. Thats mean at this point, the titration is reached exactly base required
to completely neutralize the acid. Thus, titration method is more practice compared to the pH calculation
method which is more theoretically. Plus, during theoretically calculation (second method), it assume
20
perfect condition without any loss. Thats why there is a difference for the K a value obtained from both
methods although the same condition is applied.
CONCLUSION
The experiment was mainly about finding the Ka value to obtain what acid is the unknown acid.
By using titration with NaOH, the Ka value calculated for the unknown acid (titration 1) is 2.24 x
10
10
method is 1.96 x
10
105 ,
. The
second method is by using determination of Ka from the initial concentration and pH of a weak acid
solution. The Ka value calculated for the unknown acid (titration 1) is 3.72 x
105
, for titration 2 is
21
3.17 x
10
10
method is 1.26 x
10
. The closest value of Ka of acid in table 1 is acetic acid that the Ka is 1.810
From the experiment we could conclude that by using determination of Ka from titration with NaOH
is more accurate than using method determination of Ka from the initial concentration and pH of a weak
acid solution . This method is more accurate as it minimize the error occurs in the experiment.
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. The experiment should include the indicator as we could see the changes of the titration.
2. Avoid parallax error while taking the reading of the burrette when do the titration. The eyes must
parallel to the the level meniscus of the burrette.
3. The air bubble in the burrette must be removed because to avoid the actual volume delivered will
be less than the volume reported.
4. Pipetting process has to be accurate in order to avoid excess addition of the titrating substances.
5. The beaker, pipette and the flask should be washed properly with distilled water in order to avoid
contaminate that will be effect the ph of solutions.
REFERENCES
Robert H.Perry, Don W.Green, Perrys Chemical Engineers Handbook, McGraw Hill,1998.
22
polyamide/polyacrylonitrile based thin film composite membranes. Journal of Membrane
Science, 372(1-2): 228-238.
Nilsson, M., G. Tragardh, et al. (2008). The influence of pH, salt and temperature on
nanofiltration performance. Journal of Membrane Science, 312(1-2): 97-106.
Su, M., D.-X. Wang, et al. (2006) Rejection of ions by NF membranes for binary
electrolyte solutions of NaCl, NaNO3, CaCl2 and Ca(NO3)2. Desalination, 191(13): 303-308.
23
APPENDICES