Consensuses of Stasis: The cultural

paradigm of reality and semiotic narrative

C. BARBARA HAMBURGER
DEPARTMENT OF POLITICS, UNIVERSITY OF
MASSACHUSETTS, AMHERST
1. Subconceptualist cultural theory and neotextual capitalism
The main theme of Wilsons[1] critique of Sartreist absurdity is the role of the artist as
writer. But if semiotic narrative holds, the works of Pynchon are reminiscent of Fellini.
Class is responsible for outdated perceptions of sexual identity, says Derrida. The
characteristic theme of the works of Pynchon is not appropriation per se, but
subappropriation. In a sense, Marx promotes the use of the patriarchial paradigm of
narrative to attack sexism.
Reicher[2] implies that we have to choose between the cultural paradigm of reality and
textual postdialectic theory. Thus, several discourses concerning the difference between
class and sexual identity exist.
The main theme of Prinns[3] analysis of semiotic narrative is a mythopoetical totality.
Therefore, Debord suggests the use of neotextual capitalism to modify and read society.
Sontags model of the cultural paradigm of reality holds that consciousness serves to
exploit the proletariat. But the subject is contextualised into a neotextual capitalism that
includes reality as a whole.
The premise of semiotic narrative suggests that sexual identity has objective value.
Thus, any number of discourses concerning the cultural paradigm of reality may be
discovered.

2. Discourses of rubicon
Culture is fundamentally used in the service of the status quo, says Debord; however,
according to Abian[4] , it is not so much culture that is fundamentally used in the
service of the status quo, but rather the economy, and therefore the failure, of culture.
The characteristic theme of the works of Pynchon is the defining characteristic of
neocultural sexual identity. In a sense, the stasis, and hence the failure, of neotextual
capitalism depicted in Pynchons Vineland is also evident in V, although in a more
capitalist sense.

If one examines semiotic narrative, one is faced with a choice: either reject the cultural
paradigm of reality or conclude that the purpose of the reader is deconstruction. If
neotextual capitalism holds, we have to choose between the cultural paradigm of reality
and Sontagist camp. Therefore, semiotic narrative implies that government is capable of
truth, given that language is distinct from truth.
Lyotard uses the term neotextual capitalism to denote the role of the poet as artist. In a
sense, Reicher[5] suggests that we have to choose between the cultural paradigm of
reality and textual discourse.
The premise of semiotic narrative implies that the raison detre of the reader is
significant form. But the primary theme of Werthers[6] critique of neotextual capitalism
is the bridge between culture and society.
The subject is interpolated into a semiotic narrative that includes reality as a reality. In a
sense, in The Limits of Interpretation (Advances in Semiotics), Eco analyses neotextual
capitalism; in The Island of the Day Before he deconstructs the cultural paradigm of
reality.
Bataille promotes the use of capitalist theory to challenge outmoded, elitist perceptions
of sexual identity. Therefore, the characteristic theme of the works of Eco is a
mythopoetical paradox.

1. Wilson, W. ed. (1972) The cultural paradigm of reality in the works of

Glass. Loompanics
2. Reicher, Y. C. (1991) The Forgotten Door: Semiotic narrative and the
cultural paradigm of reality. Harvard University Press
3. Prinn, U. Z. O. ed. (1988) The cultural paradigm of reality, constructive
desituationism and socialism. OReilly & Associates
4. Abian, M. D. (1972) Expressions of Defining characteristic: The cultural
paradigm of reality and semiotic narrative. Panic Button Books
5. Reicher, O. ed. (1989) Socialism, the cultural paradigm of reality and
subdialectic materialism. University of Oregon Press
6. Werther, G. E. (1971) Poststructural Dedeconstructivisms: Semiotic
narrative in the works of Eco. Loompanics

The essay you have just seen is completely meaningless and was randomly generated
by the Postmodernism Generator. To generate another essay, follow this link. If you
liked this particular essay and would like to return to it, follow this link for a
bookmarkable page.
The Postmodernism Generator was written by Andrew C. Bulhak using the Dada
Engine, a system for generating random text from recursive grammars, and modified
very slightly byJosh Larios (this version, anyway. There are others out there).
This installation of the Generator has delivered 12386803 essays since 25/Feb/2000
18:43:09 PST, when it became operational.
More detailed technical information may be found in Monash University Department of
Computer Science Technical Report 96/264: On the Simulation of Postmodernism
and Mental Debility Using Recursive Transition Networks.
More generated texts are linked to from the sidebar to the right.
If you enjoy this, you might also enjoy reading about the Social Text Affair, where NYU
Physics Professor Alan Sokals brilliant(ly meaningless) hoax article was accepted by a
cultural criticism publication.