The Jewish Link (Bergen County, NJ)

Newton, MA Schools Fail to Provide Facts About the Middle East

Steve Stotsky/JNS
July 11, 2013
Newton, MAControversy continues to simmer in the upscale Boston suburb of Newton over the use
of biased and substandard instructional materials to teach students about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Recently, the town spared no expense renovating one of its high schools at a cost of $200 million. But
Newtons commitment to its schools has not translated into ensuring that factually accurate material is
used to teach students about the Middle East.
The controversy began two years ago when a parent, looking over his daughters reading assignment,
discovered a handout that accused Israeli soldiers of abusing and murdering imprisoned Palestinian
women. The selection came from a textbook called The Arab World Studies Notebook. This textbook
had already been exposed for its advocacy of Islam and for making ludicrous claimsfor example, that
Muslim explorers discovered America and that Iroquois Indians had Muslim names. The outcry that
followed prompted the school administration to remove it.
But that turned out to be just the tip of the iceberg. A more widespread problem was revealed when it
was learned that a leader in the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement against Israel had given
a seminar to history teachers on teaching about the Middle East. Soon, more evidence of inaccurate and
anti-Israel materials used in the schools came to light.
Last November, in an attempt to head off the controversy, the vice chairman of the Newton School
Committee published an op-ed in local papers offering reassurance that anti-Israel materials were not
systematically used in Newton schools. He denounced town residents who had raised the issue for
engaging in McCarthyesque tactics, and added, Does it really sound plausible that for years virtually
everyone has unknowingly been the victim of the teaching of such horrible material?
Sadly, the most recent batch of handouts used in the 10th-grade honors class offers new evidence of a
continuing problem. It contains a timeline titled POV: History of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict that
purports to cover both An Israeli Perspective and A Palestinian Perspective. It was compiled in
2001 by a young intern with no apparent expertise on the subject.
An accompanying class discussion guide called Class notes for Israel Palistine (sic) (Student &
Teacher Discussion) dismisses the religious component, stating, This is a conflict over land. What
lies behind the downplaying of the religious component is an attempt to cast Israel as a neo-colonial
state usurping the land of the indigenous population. This narrative, fashionable among anti-Israel
academics, designates the Arabs as indigenous people while denying that status to the Jews whose
continuous history on the land goes much further back.
The class guide asserts, Jewish nationalism (Zionism) and Palestinian nationalism seek essentially the
same goal: a state that can provide security, economic opportunity, and a connection to a land. This
feigned evenhanded approach promotes a falsehood, for both the Palestine Liberation Organization
(PLO) and Hamas charters call for the dismantling of the Jewish state. An accurate recounting of
Palestinian nationalism shows that opposition to the Jewish state came first, while the demand for a
Palestinian Arab state emerged only later.

Newton students should read the works of distinguished scholars. Instead, students are exposed to the
dogma peddled by anti-Israel activists at teacher workshops, to fringe academics or to error-prone
pages pulled from the Internet. One such handout from a website called Flashpoints identified
Jerusalem as the capital of Palestine (a non-existent state) and incorrectly labeled Tel Aviv as the capital
of Israel (its actually Jerusalem).
Palestinian terrorism is downplayed, while rare instances of Israeli violence are highlighted. The first
terrorist act inside Israel and the West Bank specifically mentioned is the 1994 attack on Palestinian
worshipers by Baruch Goldstein. The murders of 37 Israelis in the coastal road massacre in March
1978 and of 26 Israeli schoolchildren and teachers in Maalot in May 1974 are not mentioned. Students
are not told that while Goldstein is reviled in Israel, Palestinian perpetrators of terror attacks, like
terrorist Dalal Mughrabi, are held up as role models to be emulated by Palestinian children.
Students are told that the Oslo Accords meant that the two sides were no longer claiming that the other
did not have the right to exist as a state of peoples on that land. Students are not informed that at the
Fatah Party Congress in 2009 participants cheered as Palestinian Authority officials vowed never to
recognize the Jewish State and reaffirmed their commitment to armed struggle.
A complete and accurate account of the conflict should not be sacrificed on the altar of evenhandedness
and the refusal to take sides. With all the upheaval in the Middle East and its impact on America,
parents unfortunately cannot count on schools and town officials to ensure that accurate and quality
instruction occurs. Parents need to make their voices heard so that their children arent fed Pollyannaish
revisions of reality.
Steven Stotsky is a senior researcher for the 65,000-member, Boston-based Committee for Accuracy in
Middle East Reporting in America (CAMERA). Any opinions expressed are solely his own.