Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
August 23,19191
-4 1
247
Correspondence
The Daylight Saving Law
To THE EDITOR
OF
NATION:
SIR: In your editorial of July 19 relative t o the Presidents veto
of the Daylight Savmg Law, you remark that it IS a matter
in which there are conflicting interests. I myself am one of
the intellectuals t o whom ~tis not of the slightest importance
whether we have the Daylight Saving Law or not. My father,
however, is a farmer, with the farmers point. of view. F o r him
I should like t o say that the farmers are
set against the fast
tlme. They feel, whether justly o r no, that it 1s a trick of the
city man t o work them harder. Indeed, they seem to be f a r
more deeply incensed over this little matter than they are over
American dishonesty in failing t o live up t o our plighted word
in the peace treaty business. Now I feel that it is an exceedingly dangerous thmg to split the brotherhood of country and
city workers over so small an issue, m t h so little moral principle involved. One cannot help wondering if the harder way is
not the easler way here too, a readjustment of the running
time of industries. Instead of compelling the wholepeople t o
turntheir clocks forward,let those who now begin work a t
seven begin at six ~f they like, and qurt an hourearlier.Let
those who begin at five still begin at five. I am aware that this
would involve a readjustment in the days schedule of busmess
that wouId be harder and more costly than the Daylight Saving
Law. But it would we11 repay such laborand expense by removing the distrust of one group for another. If
this is to be
done, however, the Daylight Saving Law must be repealed, and
the whole matter made the concern of local communities. The
city and town must take the initiative, because of them flexible
organization. Let the proper officials of each city o r town decree
that work and business shall begin an hour earlier-not that
the clocks shall be turnedforward,forthe
effect of such a
change is t o make the farmer change his clock also in order to
beon time when he comes to town. The city dweller would
thus have an extra hour in his day at evening, and the farmer
would be going to work a t the same old time. The psychological
effect on his mind would be well worth producing.
Sprakers,
Y.,J d y 21
CLARENCE CARR T O THE EDITOR
O F THE NATION:
EDITOR
O F THE NATION:
Down here Inold Missouri we should like t o know what
good there is inthis
so-called Dayhght
Saving
Law. The
business men and farmers of this State generally, as far as my
observation goes, are opposed t o it, and about the only class o f
men and women who favor it are those who have least a t stake
and would hke to have not one but several extra loafing hours
in the afternoon. Ninety per cent. of our farmers pay no atten-
TO
THE
The Nation
248
...
To
THE
PRESIDENT:
The Nation
August 23,19191
249
Literature
The Younger Henry James
As Viewed in Paris
for
...