Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
and
time.
Both
the
book
and
the
podcast
aim
to
plan
out
a
weekend
in
Europe
for
their
audience.
The
audience
is
seemingly
of
a
mixed
income,
but
mostly
for
adults
on
a
vacation
rather
than
students
backpacking
for
a
weekend.
Luckily,
we
were
in
Porto
with
our
parents
so
we
were
able
to
see
a
few
things
that
we
wouldnt
be
able
to
traveling
as
penny-pinching
students.
We
targeted
our
audience,
therefore,
as
travelers
on
a
vacation
with
a
medium
range
of
money
but
a
limited
time
frame,
looking
to
get
the
best
taste
of
a
city
in
one
weekend.
Finally,
we
realized
after
listening
to
our
rough
cut
that
we
sound
tired
and
run-down
(mostly
because
we
were
at
the
time).
We
considered
cheesing
it
up
a
little,
trying
to
sound
like
an
over-
enthusiastic
recording.
We
decided
instead
to
shoot
more
for
lively
but
sophisticated
because
the
book
that
we
were
modeling
it
off
clearly
valued
form.
The
book
is
a
beautiful
red
with
illustrations
and
pictures
inside,
aiming
to
be
elevated
above
the
run
of
the
mill
travel
guide.
We think that what brings our argument beyond the obvious is the unique
structure
of
the
podcast.
Rather
than
simply
what
you
should
see
in
Porto,
our
podcast
adds
the
challenge
of
how
you
can
see
enough
of
Porto
in
36
hours.
Furthermore,
because
we
actually
lived
and
loved
all
of
what
we
are
writing
about,
we
were
able
to
give
life
to
the
descriptions.
Furthermore,
Antonia,
a
family
friend
who
has
lived
in
Portugal
for
all
61
years
of
his
life,
showed
us
around
and
told
us
the
best
places
to
go
and
see.
These
details
all
allowed
us
to
create
a
piece
that
is
meaningful
to
the
reader
and
different
than
other
travel
guides.
Our ethos for this article is possible stronger than ever in that we are writing
small
blurbs
about
places
and
experiences
that
we
had
just
partaken
in.
This
was
both
of
our
first
travel
guide
type
piece
(other
than
XXXXXs
haircut
piece
which
was
far
more
specific).
We
had
the
opportunity
to
take
one
of
our
favorite
trips
yet
and
turn
it
into
a
guide.
Because
it
had
smaller
views
of
each
recommendation,
we
were
able
to
paint
the
picture
of
what
we
experienced,
while
still
leaving
room
for
the
reader
to
create
their
own
experience
there.
Some
unofficial
ethos
could
come
from
how
much
we
absolutely
loved
Porto
and
were
excited
to
talk
passionately
about
it.
Finally,
we
researched
Porto
through
Antonio,
who
we
interviewed
about
his
town
and
how
to
experience
it
to
its
fullest.
Unfortunately,
we
collected
several
of
sound
bites
on
XXXXXs
phone,
which
was
broken
right
before
writing
the
piece
(we
could
listen
to
them
but
couldnt
download
them
onto
the
computer).
The
interviews
with
Antonio
still
provided
research
and
ethos,
but
we
couldnt
add
them
to
the
podcast.
Interviewing Antonio also addresses an ethical topic that XXXXX had brought
up
in
one
of
her
workshop
pieces
about
being
an
expert
in
travel
writing.
After
seeing
Porto
for
a
weekend,
we
are
hardly
exports
on
Porto.
Antonio
is,
however,
and
by
gaining
his
advice
and
combining
it
with
what
we,
as
travelers,
want
to
see
of
a
city
in
a
weekend,
we
were
able
to
develop
a
more
ethically
sound
piece.
This
awareness
shows
our
growing
awareness
of
ethical
issues
in
travel
writing.
We believe that this podcast embodies our transition from thinking about
how
to
be
travel
writers,
to
actually
being
travel
writers.
We
were
thinking
about
our
podcast
and
how
to
collect
interviews,
pictures,
and
mental
images
of
what
we
would
include
from
the
beginning.
On
one
hand,
we
are
aware
that
this
could
shape
our
travel
and
change
what
we
do.
However,
we
had
a
pretty
amazing
weekend,
and
we
believe
that
that
itself
is
proof
that
we
did
it
well.
In
fact,
traveling
as
travel
writers
may
have
even
enhanced
our
travel
in
that
we
paid
more
attention
to
detail,
remembering
places
and
shops
that
we
may
not
have.
our
podcast
stronger.
We
each
have
individual
strengths
in
our
writing
that
complimented
each
other
as
we
put
the
project
together.
Furthermore,
we
each
edited
and
tweaked
all
of
the
sections.
This
gave
us
a
unique
editing
experience.
Rather
than
editing
another
persons
work
about
an
experience
that
is
foreign
to
us,
we
were
a
part
of
the
experience
and
could
therefore
determine
if
the
description
adequately
captured
it.
Several
of
the
articles
regarding
coauthorship
examined
how
the
idea
of
authorship
guides
the
writing
process.
This
proved
to
both
be
true
and
untrue
for
us.
It
was
true
in
the
sense
that
we
bounced
ideas
off
of
each
other
more
frequently
throughout
the
weekend.
We
were
constantly
throwing
out
things
that
we
should
include,
pointing
out
pictures
to
capture,
and
helping
each
other
find
people
to
interview.
However,
it
is
not
true
in
the
sense
that
we
normally
help
one
another
out
with
ideas,
topics,
and
relevant
information
for
our
articles.
These
past
experiences
reiterate
the
argument
that
the
old
idea
of
authorship,
which
acknowledges
it
as
a
collaborative,
cooperative,
and
collective,
better
captures
our
actual
writing
process.
We
have
spent
the
semester
bouncing
ideas
off
of
one
another
on
long
runs
and
on
bus
rides,
and
we
believe
that
we
have
most
definitely
influenced
each
others
writing.
Holly
Laird
wrote
regarding
how
she
analyzed
coauthors
in
her
book
this
study
reads
coauthored
texts
as
the
realization
of
relationships.
These
writers
relationships
reach
their
audience
through
stories.
While
we
did
not
write
a
story
per
say,
I
believe
that
our
podcast
is
a
formal
version
of
our
relationship:
lively,
exciting,
and
constantly
trying
to
make
the
most
of
every
hours.