Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
DOI 10.1007/s11356-013-1728-4
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Received: 5 February 2013 / Accepted: 8 April 2013 / Published online: 26 April 2013
# Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013
Introduction
Heavy metals are the major toxic constituent of various industrial wastewaters and pose greater risk for the environment
if not treated properly prior to their disposal. In the midst of
various heavy metals, chromium (VI) is considered as highly
hazardous metal due to its oxidizing, mutagenic, and carcinogenic properties and almost every statutory body in the world
has listed Cr (VI) as priority toxic chemical for control
(Cheung and Gu 2007). Moreover, the persistent stability
due to non-biodegradable nature and high solubility in aqueous environment increases the toxicity and contamination
ability of this heavy metal (Cheung and Gu 2007; Desai et
al. 2008; Colin et al. 2012; Liu et al. 2012). Electroplating,
leather tanning processes, chromate ore processing, dyes and
pigments, wood preservation, alloy making, and metal
finishing industries are major source of Cr (VI) and its compounds into the environment (Suksabye et al. 2008; Quintelas
et al. 2009; Ye et al. 2010). As per US-EPA, the permissible
limit of less than 0.05 mg L1 of Cr (VI) has to be attained
before disposal of chromate containing wastewater into natural environment (Srivastava and Thakur 2007; Dhal et al.
2010; Sharma and Adholeya 2011).
Various conventional physico-chemical processes such as
chemical reduction followed by precipitation, ion exchange,
adsorption (coal, activated carbon, fly ash, alum, and agricultural waste), reverse osmosis, membrane separation, and
solvent extraction are available for treatment of chromium
and other heavy-metals-containing wastewater (Gupta et al.
2009; Owlad et al. 2009; Dhal et al. 2010; Ye et al. 2010;
Sharma and Adholeya 2011; Liu et al. 2012). But due to
their tendency to cause secondary pollution along with high
cost and high energy requirement, the focus has been shifted
to better alternative ways of treatment, i.e., biological
6629
6630
6631
7
6
[ Cr (VI) ], mg L-1
Results
5
4
3
2
1
0
0
10
24
Time (h)
48
72
6632
40
30
[Cr (VI) ], mg L-1
3.5 mg/l
7.0 mg/l
14 mg/l
21 mg/l
28 mg/l
35 mg/l
35
25
20
15
10
24
48
Time (h)
72
96
a 120
100
Cr (VI) reduction (%)
From range of heavy metals selected to monitor the influence of heavy metals on Cr (VI) removal ability of strain
B9, the Cu was found to stimulate the process. In presence
of Cu, the initial Cr (VI) content of 7.0 mg L1 was reduced
to non-detectable level after 24 h of incubation, i.e., 100 %
chromate reduction was observed (Fig. 3a). Whereas, presence of Ni, Zn, and Pb showed inhibitory effect on chromate
reduction as only 34.6, 10.25, and 9 % Cr (VI) reduction
was observed in presence of Ni, Zn, and Pb, respectively.
80
60
40
20
0
Control
Cu
Ni
Heavy metals
Zn
Pb
b120
100
Cr (VI) reduction (%)
80
60
40
0
7
10
[Cr (VI)], mg L
14
21
-1
6633
6634
Parameters
Color
pHa
COD
TSS
TDS
Cr (VI)
Total Cr
Ni
Fe
Cu
Pb
Cd
Yellow
8.3
700
856
1,868
60
493
102
13.7
1.2
0.5
BDL
a 100
35
90
30
25
70
60
20
50
15
40
30
10
80
20
10
0
0
24
48
66
Time (h)
96
120
144
b 100
Control
Acinetobacter sp. B9
90
80
70
Removal (%)
50
45
40
% Transmission
35
50
40
30
30
25
60
20
10
0
20
Cr (VI)
Total Cr
Ni
15
10
5
0
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
Wavenumber (cm-1)
1500
1000
500
Fig. 6 FTIR spectra of biomass grown in (a) presence, and (b) absence
of Cr (VI)
Discussion
The isolated strain of Acinetobacter sp. could grow well in
presence of high concentration of Cr (VI) and other heavy
metals and thus seems to be promising for bioremediation of
wastewaters contaminated with multiple heavy metals. There
are few reports available in literature on Cr (VI) removal by
Acinetobacter spp. (Srivastava and Thakur 2007; Pei et al.
2009; Essahale et al. 2012; Panda and Sarkar 2012; Samuel et
al. 2012). For instance, Essahale et al. (2012) and Panda and
Sarkar (2012) have reported tannery isolates belonging to
Acinetobacter sp. AB1 and Acinetobacter sp. PD S2 that can
tolerate 400 mg L1 and 4.2 g L1 of Cr (VI), respectively. On
the other hand, Pei et al. (2009) reported Acinetobacter
haemolyticus strain isolated from textile dye effluent that can
tolerate up to 90 mg L1 of Cr (VI).
In the present study, Acinetobacter sp. B9 was also found
to reduce the toxic concentration of Cr (VI) from synthetic
media. Though complete Cr (VI) reduction was not observed even at the lowest concentration used (3.5 mg L1),
but reduction rate was found to increase with increase in Cr
(VI) concentrations of up to 28 mg L1 (0.097, 0.194, 0.202,
0.20, and 0.245 mg L 1 h1 at 3.5, 7.0, 14, 21, and
28 mg L1, respectively). The reduction rate was found to
decline at 35 mg L1 concentration (0.220 mg L1 h1).
Similar trend on chromate reduction have also been reported
by Zakaria et al. (2007) and Dey and Paul (2012) using A.
haemolyticus and Arthrobacter sp. SUK 1201, respectively.
The lower rate of reduction at 35 mg L1 of Cr (VI) could be
due to Cr (VI) toxicity on Acinetobacter sp. B9 cells as also
reported by Pang et al. (2011) and Dey and Paul (2012) in
case of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Arthrobacter sp. SUK
1201, respectively at higher chromium concentration.
Optimum pH for B9-mediated chromate removal was
found to be in the range of 6.08.0. Srivastava and Thakur
(2007) and Panda and Sarkar (2012) have reported pH 7.0 to
be optimum for chromate removal in case of Acinetobacter
sp PCP3 and Acinetobacter sp. PD 12 S2, respectively. In
contrast, optimum pH of 10.0 was reported by Essahale et
al. (2012) in case of Acinetobacter sp. AB 1.
6635
6636
of sulfonate group (Das and Guha 2007; Pei et al. 2009). The
above comparative changes in the spectrum of Cr-treated
biomass with that of Cr-untreated cells indicate the involvement of chromium with functional groups of bacterial cell
(Dhal et al. 2010). The presence of peak at 786 cm1 is
characteristic of Cr-O vibration which shows the presence of
Cr on the cell wall of chromium-treated B9 cells. This interaction is also evident from the elongation of chromium-treated
B9 cells as shown by scanning electron microscopy studies.
Similar observation of Cr-O vibrations in the region of 782
725 cm1 and its correlation with elongation of cells due to
cells interaction with chromium is also reported by Samuel et
al. (2012) in case of Bacillus subtilis VITSUKMW1, A. junii
VITSUKMW2, and Escherichia coli VITSUKMW3.
To test the applicability and efficiency of strain B9 in
bioremediation of chromium from industrial wastewater, the
strain B9 was inoculated in chromium and other heavy-metalsladen real industrial wastewater. The Acinetobacter sp. B9
strain along with the native microorganisms of wastewater
was observed to rapidly remove hexavalent chromium, total
chromium, and nickel from the wastewater as compared to
control. During treatment, the original yellow color of the
wastewater (due to the presence of high content of dichromate
ions) was found to fade, suggesting the removal of Cr (VI) from
the wastewater. The removal of some amount of heavy metals
in case of control might be due to the presence of indigenous
microbes of wastewater. Since same physical and nutritional
conditions (aeration, temperature, and nutrients) have been
provided to both control and experimental setups; that might
have arranged favorable conditions for growth of indigenous
microbes also. But comparatively lesser or slow Cr and Ni
removal in case of control confirmed that strain B9 augmented
the removal of these heavy metals from wastewater.
Conclusion
Overall, the following outcome emerged from this study: (1)
the isolated strain B9 can tolerate high concentration of Cr
(VI) and also able to significantly reduce the concentration of
Cr (VI) from the media. (2) The results of FT-IR and TEM
showed chromium absorption/accumulation by bacterium
cells grown in presence of Cr. SEM micrograph also showed
visible morphological changes in the cells exposed to chromium. (3) Simultaneous removal of high concentrations of
total Cr, Cr (VI), and Ni was observed when strain B9 was
applied for bioremediation of real industrial wastewater.
These studies shows that Acinetobacter sp. B9 could be
effectively used as bioremediation tool for alleviation of high
concentration of toxic heavy metals from industrial wastewater.
Acknowledgments The financial support provided by University
Grants Commission (UGC), Govt. of India in the form of Senior
References
Abe F, Miura T, Nagahama T, Inoue A, Usami R, Horikoshi K (2001)
Isolation of a highly copper-tolerant yeast, Cryptococcus sp., from
the Japan trench and the induction of superoxide dismutase activity by Cu2+. Biotechnol Lett 23:20272034
Ahmad WA, Zakaria ZA, Khasim AR, Alias MA, Ismail SMHS (2010)
Pilot-scale removal of chromium from industrial wastewater using
the ChromeBac system. Bioresour Technol 101:43714378
APHA (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and
wastewater, 19th edn. American Public Health Association,
American Water Works Association & Water Environment
Federation, Washington, DC
Chatterjee S, Ghosh I, Mukherje KK (2011) Uptake and removal of
toxic Cr (VI) by Pseudomonas aeruginosa: physico-chemical and
biological evaluation. Curr Sci 101:645652
Cheung KH, Gu J-D (2007) Mechanism of hexavalent chromium
detoxification by microorganisms and bioremediation application
potential: a review. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 59:815
Colin VL, Villegas LB, Abate CM (2012) Indigenous microorganisms
as potential bioremediators for environments contaminated with
heavy metals. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 69:2837
Das SK, Guha AK (2007) Biosorption of chromium by Termitomyces
clypeatus. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 60:4654
Das AP, Mishra S (2010) Biodegradation of the metallic carcinogen
hexavalent chromium Cr (VI) by an indigenously isolated bacterial strain. J Carcinog 9:16
David GFX, Herbertt J, Wright CDS (1973) The ultrastructure of
pineal ganglion in the ferret. J Anat 115:7989
Desai C, Jain K, Madamwar D (2008) Hexavalent chromate reductase
activity in cytosolic fractions of Pseudomonas sp. G1DM21 isolated from Cr (VI) contaminated industrial landfill. Process
Biochem 43:713721
Dey S, Paul AK (2012) Optimization of cultural conditions for growth
associated chromate reduction by Arthrobacter sp. SUK 1201 isolated
from chromite mine overburden. J Hazard Mater 213214:200206
Dhal B, Thatoi H, Das N, Pandey BD (2010) Reduction of hexavalent
chromium by Bacillus sp. isolated from chromite mine soils and
characterization of reduced product. J Chem Technol Biotechnol
85:14711479
Dong X, Hong Q, He L, Jiang X, Li S (2008) Characterization of
phenol-degrading bacterial strains isolated from natural soil. Int
Biodeterior Biodegrad 62:257262
Essahale A, Malki M, Marin I, Moumni M (2012) Hexavalent
chromium reduction and accumulation by Acinetobacter AB1
isolated from Fez Tanneries in Morocco. Indian J Microbiol
52:4853
Ganguli A, Tripathi AK (2002) Bioremediation of toxic chromium
from electroplating effluent by chromate-reducing Pseudomonas
aeruginosa A2Chr in two bioreactors. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol
58:416420
Gupta VK, Carrott PJM, Carrott MMLR, Suhas TL (2009) Low-cost
adsorbents: growing approach to wastewater treatmenta review.
Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 39:783842
He Z, Gao F, Sha T, Hu Y, He C (2009) Isolation and characterization
of a Cr (VI)-reduction Ochrobactrum sp. strain CSCr-3 from
chromium landfill. J Hazard Mater 163:869873
6637
Sagar S, Dwivedi A, Yadav S, Tripathi M, Kaistha SD (2012)
Hexavalent chromium reduction and plant growth promotion by
Staphylococcus arlettae Strain Cr11. Chemosphere 86:847852
Samuel J, Paul ML, Pulimi M, Nirmala MJ, Chandrasekaran N,
Mukherjee A (2012) Hexavalent chromium bioremoval through
adaptation and consortia development from Sukinda chromite
mine isolates. Ind Eng Chem Res 51:37403749
Sharma S, Adholeya A (2011) Detoxification and accumulation of
chromium from tannery effluent and spent chrome effluent by
Paecilomyces lilacinus fungi. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 65:309
317
Srinath T, Verma T, Ramteke PW, Garg SK (2002) Chromium (VI)
biosorption and bioaccumulation by chromate resistant bacteria.
Chemosphere 48:427435
Srivastava S, Thakur IS (2007) Evaluation of biosorption potency of
Acinetobacter sp. for removal of hexavalent chromium from
tannery effluent. Biodegradation 18:637646
Suksabye P, Thiravetyan P, Nakbanpote W (2008) Column study of
chromium (VI) biosorption from electroplating industry by coconut coir pith. J Hazard Mater 160:5662
Wani R, Kodam KM, Gawai KR, Dhakephalkar PK (2007) Chromate
reduction by Burkholderia cepacia MCMB-821, isolated from the
pristine habitat of alkaline crater lake. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol
75:627632
Ye J, Yin H, Mai B, Peng H, Qin H, He B, Zhang N (2010) Biosorption
of chromium from aqueous solution and electroplating wastewater
using mixture of Candida lipolytica and dewatered sewage
sludge. Bioresour Technol 101:38933902
Zakaria ZA, Zakaria Z, Surif S, Ahmad WA (2007) Hexavalent chromium reduction by Acinetobacter haemolyticus isolated from
heavy-metal contaminated wastewater. J Hazard Mater 146:3038