Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
SEPTEMBER-2014
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I would like to express my gratitude towards RSWM LTD. Company for
providing me the opportunity to learn about the practical aspects of financial
statement analysis.
Learning never ends and no one teaches more than what practical experience
teaches us. Working with RSWM LTD. Company has been a great practical
experience for me as I have learned many aspects of ratio analysis and I
could apply my theoretical knowledge in the practical field of work.
I would like to thank our director Dr.prof.R.Genesan and our head of the
Department Dr.Roshan Kazi.
I would like to thank my project guide Mr.Asad Zafir for guiding me in
successfully completing my project report.
I am extremely thankful to RSWM LTD. Company and Mr. Ashok
Sodani my unit head in RSWM LTD. For providing me an opportunity to
work with the organization.
Last but not least, I am also thankful to the college staff, my parents and my
friends for helping me directly or indirectly in this project report.
DECLARATION
I, Musaji Hussain Yusuf hereby declare that the project titled ratio
analysis of RSWM LTD. At RSWM LTD. Is the result of original and
genuine work carried out by me under the guidance of Mr.Asad Zafir, Allana
Institute Of Management Sciences.
The project report is submitted in partial fulfillment for the opportunity of
the MBA degree for University of Pune.
I declare that this work is authentic and the contents referred from the other
sources have been acknowledged.
INDEX
SR.NO
TOPICS
PAGE NO.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1
INTRODUCTION
COMPANY PROFILE
LITERATURE REVIEW
21
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
36
39
FINDING,SUGGESTIONS AND
CONCLUSION
BIBLIOGRAPHY
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The following project gave me a wonderful opportunity to get acquainted
with the corporate environment and practical use of my knowledge. I
experienced the culture, the attitude, co-ordination and the professionalism
carried in the corporate world. It laid the platform for my corporate carrier.
The project deals with the understanding of various types ratio analysis and
its interpretations for the benefit of investors. It also helped me to
understand the calculations, the practical use and in depth impact of ratio. It
portrays a clear picture of the investors who are willing to invest. It provides
information as to how ratios are calculated, analyzed, compared and used to
take management decisions for the success of business.
OBJECTIVE
The objective of the project is also the analyze financial condition of the
company on the basis of procured historical data. For any organization to
work efficiently continuous improvement areas identified based on financial
analysis.
To study financial statements to know profit and operating efficiency
To study the liquidity position to the firm with help of current ratio.
Through the net profit ratio and other profitability ratio, understand
the profitability position of the company
To find out the utility of financial ratio in credit analysis and
determining the financial capability of the firm.
Evaluating companys performance relating to financial statement
analysis.
FINDINGS
Particulars
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
Current ratio
1.04386
0.9997
0.9797
Quick ratio
0.7223
0.7069
0.6662
DEBT EQUITY
RATIO
EQUITY RATIO
2.85
2.17
1.533
0.16
0.18
0.21
(1.08)%
2.77%
3.44%
RETURN ON
EQUITY(ROE)
EARNING PER
SHARE
(7.5947)%
20.6548%
24.9892%
(9.41)
29.32
42.68
0.6930
1.2549
1.2781
DEBTORS TURNOVER
RATIO
10.77
11.35
12.11
Average collection
period(approx)
33 days
32 days
30 days
44.14
36.43
47.72
8 days
10 days
8 days
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
RATIO ANALYSIS
Ratio analysis is a powerful tool of financial analysis based on ratio. A ratio
is defined as the indicate quotient up to mathematical expression. In
financial analysis ratio is used as a benchmark, evaluating the financial
position and performance of a firm. The absolute accounting figures reported
in the financial statement do not provide the meaningful understanding of
the financial position of a firm. But well expressed in terms of related figure,
it yield significant inference. Ratio analysis reflects a quantitative
relationship that helps to form qualitative judgment.
Definition:
ratio analysis is a systematic use of ratio to interpret of the financial
statement so that the strength and weakness of the firm, its historical and its
current financial condition can be determined.---khan & jain
2. comparison of the past and present ratio of the same firm and/or with
the industry standard.
STANDARD OF COMPARISON
The ratio analysis involves comparison for a useful interpretation of the
financial statement. A single ratio in itself does not indicate favorable or
unfavorable condition it should be compared with some standard. Standard
of comparison may consist of following:
Trend analysis- the ratios are compared to those calculated for the
previous year in order to know whether the financial position is
improving or deteriorating.
Competitors ratios- the ratio of the firm may be compared with ratio
of competitors or industry average, which are used as benchmark.
Hence the position against the competitors can be known to analyze
the strength and weakness.
Index analysis-the ratio of the current year is compared to those of
base year. It can be even compared to standard or planned ratio.
Common sized statement-the items of the balance sheet are stated in
the terms of Percentage of total assets and items in income
statement are expressed in percentage of sale.
OBJECTIVES
To study financial statements to no profit and operating efficiency
To study the liquidity position of the firm with help of current ratio.
Through the net profit ratio and other profitability ratio, understand
the profitability position of the company.
To find out the utility of financial ratio in credit analysis and
determining the financial capability of the firm.
Evaluating companys performance relating to financial statement
analysis.
LIMITATIONS
The study provides an inside into the financial statements. every study will
be bound with certain limitations. The below mentioned are the constraints
under which the study is carried out
.
One of the factors of the study was lack of availability of ample
information
Most of the information has been kept confidential.
Time is an important limitation of the whole study was conducted ina
period of sixty days, which is not sufficient to carry out proper
analysis and interpretation.
CHAPTER 2
COMPANY
PROFILE
COMPANY PROFILE
COMPANY NAME:
R.S.W.M LTD.
CORPORATE OFFICE:
BHILWARA T-12,
L.N. JHUNJHUNWALA
CHAIRMAN:
RAVI
JHUNJHUNWALA
MANAGING DIRECTOR:
SHEKHAR AGRAWAL
RIJU
JHUNJHUNWALA
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR:
J. C. LADDHA
DIRECTOR:
KAMAL GUPTA
COMPANY SECRETARY:
SURENDER GUPTA
AWARDS
The LNJ Bhilwara Group not only has several firsts to its credit
but also recognition for its commitment to quality and excellence with
several national awards and certifications.
INTRODUCTION
OF
THE COMPANY
The LNJ Bhilwara Group, founded in 1961, has today grown into a strong
global presence worth Rs.2049 crores. The Group has been nurtured into a
successful growth track by the able guidance of the Founder and ChairmanEmeritus Mr. L.N.Jhunjhunwala. Currently,
The LNJ Bhilwara Group stands as one of the largest firms on the corporate
horizon in India with over 20,000 employees and 20 production units
positioned at strategic locations across the country. The Groups export
earning comprise of 45% of the Groups turnover.
integrated Graphite
"To me, the LNJ Bhilwara Group is not a business house, I see it as
an institution that is committed to seeking excellence."
L.N.Jhunjhunwala
Chairman Emeritus
MISSION
TO CONTINUOUSLY GROW ON SUSTAINABLE BASIS AND BE A
MAJOR, INNOVATIVE, PROFITABLE AND THE MOST ADMIRED
TEXTILE MANUFACTURER IN ASIA.
VISION
Our vision is to forge ahead into the new millennium with an immediate
sense of purpose and to be seen as the undisputed leader, fully equipped to
deliver the best, across the diverse spectra of our many businesses, fuelled
LOOKING FORWARD
We intend to position Mayur as the clear favorite for an ever-demanding
clientele and become the favored choice for the aspiring consumer. This
demanding segment promises a huge potential in terms of market share and
thus leading us to the task providing customer satisfaction.
Mayur's product quality is at par with global norms and standards. A
significant chunk of our fabric production is exported to Middle East,
Mediterranean countries, Europe, Far East and USA.
PRODUCTION DEPARTMENT
SPINING
There are three sections in spinning unit mainly preparatory
section,
Spinning section & post spinning section. The main function of
this section is proper mixing of polyester & woolen raw
material, which comes in pressed bales & manufacturing of
yarn 65% relative humidity, is required in this section.
This truly international blended yarn is the result of the world's
premium technologies, Radio frequency dryers, which are
ultimate in advancement of drying dyed polyester & woolen
tops & grilling & combining machines from NSC, France
internationally renowned for the mixing of polyester woolen
blends contributing to the yarn's technologies supremacy are
BSL ring frame machines and electronically monitored T.F.O.
Auto corners The zinger ring spinner 421 combines solid &
reliable engineering with top-level efficiency, reliability &
sturdiness using automation & high teach components of the
future.
WEAVING
PROCESSING:
There are two sub sections dying & finishing. It is designed to
quickly & evenly impart the desired degree of finish & to
accurate consistently repeat this under the production conditions.
Finishing is undertaken with sharing equipment and finally
rotary press ensures all the work, that every inch of the fabric is
uniformly accepted worldwide. Supervisor, machines & papers
press give the fabric a qualitative finishing edge. The processing
technology is employed to create these fabrics in truly worldclass fashion.
ACHIEVEMENTS
RSWM Ltd is the winner of SRTEPC Highest Export Award for
polyester/viscose yarn exports for the last several consecutive years,
which includes two gold and one bronze in March 2005.
Maral is Indias fully integrated 100% EOU cotton knitwear unit and
winner of TEXPROCIL Silver trophy in 100% EOU / EPZ category.
Maral has also been awarded Silver Trophy by AEPC.
Maral is the recipient of Rajiv Gandhi National Quality Award.
Maral bagged "Greentech Safety Award".
RSWM, Rishabhdev unit bagged National Export Award. Rishabhdev
unit also bagged SRTEPC Excellence award for highest production in
export of 100% Polyester spun yarn.
BSL received the "National Certificate of Merit" for outstanding
export performance.
Bhilwara Spinners has been accorded the prestigious Niryat ShreeCertificate of Excellence for Outstanding export performance
CHAPTER 3
LITERATURE
REVIEW
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Financial Statements are those statements that provide information about the
profitability and the financial position of the business; it includes two
statements i.e. Profit and Loss account or Income Statement and Balance
Sheet or Position Statement.
The income statements present the summary of the income earned and the
expenses incurred during a financial year. Position statement presents the
financial position of the business at the end of the year.
Before understanding the meaning of analysis of financial statements it is
necessary to understand the meaning of analysis and financial statements.
Analysis means establishing a meaningful relationship between various
items of the two financial statements with each other in such a way that
conclusion is drawn. By financial statement, that means the two statements
i.e. (1) Profit & Loss A/C or Income Statements and (2) Balance Sheet or
Position Statements. These are prepared in the end of the given period of
time. They are indicators of profitability and financial soundness of a
business concern. Thus, analysis of financial statements means establishing
meaningful relationship between various item of two financial statements,
i.e. income statements and position statements.
R RATIO
Classification of Ratio:
categories are not fixed in all over the world however there are almost the
same, just with different names:
1. Liquidity Ratios: measure the availability of cash to pay debt, which give
a picture of a company's short term financial situation.
2. Profitability Ratios: which use margin analysis and show the return on
sales and capital employed.
3. Solvency or Gearing Ratios: measures the percentage of capital employed
that is financed by debt and long term finance. The higher the gearing, the
higher the dependence on borrowing and long term financing. The lower the
gearing ratio, the higher the dependence on equity financing. Traditionally,
the higher the level of gearing, the higher the level of financial risk due to
the increase volatility of profits. It should be noted that the term Leverage
is used in some texts.
4. Turnover Ratios: or activity group ratios indicate efficiency of
organization to various kinds of assets by converting them to the form of
sales.
9. Financial analysts: they need to know various matters, for example, the
accounting concepts employed for inventories, depreciation, bad debts and
so on. Therefore they are interested in possibly all the ratios.
Liquidity Ratios:
The two liquidity ratios, the current ratio and the acid test ratio, are the most
important ratios in almost the whole of ratio analysis and also the simplest to
use Liquidity ratios provide information about a firms ability to meet its
short- term financial obligations. They are particular interest to those
extending short term credit to the firm. Two frequently-used liquidity ratios
are current and quick ratio.
While liquidity ratios are most helpful for short-term creditors/suppliers and
bankers, they are also important to financial managers who must meet
obligations to suppliers of credit and various government agencies. A
company's ability to turn short-term assets into cash to cover debts is of the
utmost importance when creditors are seeking payment. Bankruptcy analysts
and mortgage originators frequently use the liquidity ratios to
determine whether a company will be able to continue as a going concern. A
complete liquidity ratio analysis can help uncover weaknesses in the
financial position of the business. Generally, the higher the value of the ratio
will be, the larger the margin of safety that the company possesses to cover
short-term debts.
Current Ratio:
This ratio measures the solvency of the company in the short term. Current
assets are those assets, which can be converted in to cash within a year.
Current liabilities and provision are those liabilities that are payable within a
year. A current ratio 2:1 indicates a highly solvent position. Banks consider a
current ratio 1.33:1 as the minimum acceptable level for providing working
capital finance.
Current Ratio= Current Assets/Current Liabilities
Quick ratio:
The essence of this ratio is a test that indicates whether a firm has enough
short-term assets to cover its immediate liabilities without selling inventory.
So it is the backing available to liabilities that must be paid almost
immediately.
There are two terms of liquid asset and liquid liabilities in this formula,
Liquid asset is all current assets except the inventories and prepaid expenses,
because prepaid expenses cannot be converted to cash. The liquid liabilities
include all current liabilities except bank overdraft and cash credit since they
are not required to be paid off immediately.
Quick Ratio= Current Assets-Inventory/Current Liabilities Bank O/D
Leverage Ratios:
This is calculated to judge the long-term financial position of the firm. These
ratios indicate mix of fund provided by owners and lenders. These ratios
indicate the extent to which the interest of the person entitled to get a fixed
return or a scheduled repayment as per the agreed term, are safe. The higher
the cover the better it is.
Debt-equity Ratio:
Capital is derived from two sources shares and loans. It is quite likely for
only shares to be issued when the company is formed but loans are
invariably raised at some later date. There are numerous reasons for issuing
loan capital.
The ratio indicates the relationship between loan funds and net worth of the
company, which is known as gearing. If the proportion of debt to equity is
low, a company is said to be low geared, and vice versa. A debt equity ratio
of 2:1 is the norm accepted by financial institutions for financing of projects.
Higher debt- equity ratio may be permitted for highly capital intensive
industries like petrochemicals, fertilizers, powers etc. the higher the gearing,
the more volatile the return to the shareholders. A debt equity ratio, which
shows a declines trend over the years, is usually taken as a positive sign
reflecting on increased cash accrual and debt and debt repayment in act, one
of the indicatory a unit turning sick is a risky debt equity ratio.
Usually when calculating ratio, the preference share capital is excluded from
debt, but if the ratio is show effect of use of fixed interest sources on
earnings available to the shareholders then it is to be included. On the other
hand, if the ratio is to examine financial solvency then preference shares
shall form part of the capital.
Debt to Equity= Long-Term Debt/ Partners Capital
Proprietary Ratio:
It indicates the relationship between owners fund and total assets. And
shows the extent to which the owner s fund are sunk in assets or different
kinds of it.
Proprietors Ratio= Partners Capital/ Total Assets
Profitability Ratios:
As the name itself suggests, this ratio is calculated to determine profitability
of the firm. The basic objective of almost every business is to earn profit
which is essential for survival of the business.
A business needs profits not only for its existence but also for its expansion
and diversification. The investors want an adequate return on their
investments, workers want higher wages, creditors want higher security for
interest and loan and the list could continue. It is a class of financial metrics
that are used to assess a business's ability to generate earnings as compared
to its expenses and other relevant costs incurred during a specific period of
time. For most of these ratios, having a higher value relative to a
competitor's ratio or the same ratio from a previous period is indicative that
the company is doing well.
CHAPTER 4
RESEARCH
METHODOLOGY
Research Methodology
Research methodology is a way to systematically do the job. It
may be understood as a science of study how research is done
scientifically. The most desirable approach with regards to the
selection of the research methodology depends on the nature of
particular work, time and resources available along with the desire
level of accuracy
METHODOLOGY
1)
Preliminary Discussion:
Preliminary discussions were held with members of Materials
Management Department, Sale Dept. and Finance Dept. to understand
the accounting of creditors, debtors, assets, expenses and inventory
control, and cash flow procedure.
Referring to Books:
Books were also referred to have understanding of working capital
management and ratio analysis.
3)
Manak Jain and members of Finance Dept. for understanding the report
preparation and projections.
4)
Referring to Documents:
Data Collection:
For this study, secondary data are used available from various
documents. The following documents have assisted in the project: Annual Report of the company.
Annual completion registers comprising detailed description of profit
and loss accounts and balance sheet of RSWM Banswara.
Quarterly Balance Sheet and P&L accounts.
6)
CHAPTER 5
DATA ANALYSIS
AND
INTERPRETATION
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
C.A
59881.05
73763.83
74013.43
C.L
57364.51
73780.53
75539.38
Current ratio
1.04386
0.9997
0.9797
Graphical representation
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
INTERPRETATION
Conservatively The Current Ratio Should Be Between 1 And 2 But With The Advent Of
Technology A Tighter Current Ratio Could Ensure That The Company Ran Its Operations
In a more efficient And Profitable Manner. A High Ratio Indicates High Liquidity And
Consequently Lower Profitability On The Other Hand A Low Ratio Will Results In High
Profitability But This Could Also Lead Short Term Insolvency. RSWM Ltd current ratio
was 1.04386 in 2011-12 which is reduced in 2012-13 to 0.9997 and further reduced to
0.9797 in 2013-14 because of increase in current liabilities and it indicate that the
liquidity position of the firm is not good and firm should not able to pay its current
liabilities on time
Particulars
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
C.A-stock
41439.8
52156.36
50327.16
C.L-Bank O/D
57364.51
73780.53
75539.38
0.7223
0.7069
0.6662
Quick ratio
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
INTERPRETATION
It indicates rupees of quick assets available for each rupee of current
liability. Traditionally a quick ratio of 1:1 is considered to be satisfactory
ratio. however this traditional rule should not be used blindly since a firm
having a quick ratio more than 1 may not be meeting it short term obligation
in time if its current assets consist of doubtful and slow paying debtors while
a firm having a quick ratio of less then 1 may be meeting its short term
obligation in time because of its very efficient inventory management.
RSWM LTD has maintained its quick ratio throughout 3 previous years
which shows that it has very efficient inventory management.
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
81688.43
71625.34
60629.63
28689.63
32857.45
39537.08
DEBT EQUITY
RATIO
2.85
2.17
1.533
Graphical representation
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
INTERPRETATION
Debt equity ratio indicates margin of safety to long term creditors. A low
debt equity ratio implies the use of more equity then debt which means a
larger safety margin for creditor since owner equity is treated as margin of
safety by creditors and vice versa.
RSWM LTD has reduced its debt by repaying them and increases the margin
of safety for creditors
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
28689.63
32857.45
39537.08
Total assets
173320.79
185046.25
185465.98
0.16
0.18
0.21
EQUITY RATIO
Graphical representation
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
INTERPRETATION
As equity ratio represent the relationship of owners funds to total assets.
Higher the ratio or the share of the shareholders in the total capital of the
company better is the long term solvency position of the company. This ratio
indicates the extent to which the assets of the company can be lost without
affecting the interest of creditors of the company. The firm in 2011-12 is
16% thus it shows that the 16% of total assets consist of share holders fund.
This percentage if increase to 18% in 2012-13 and 21 % in 2013-14.
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
Net Profit
(2178.92)
6786.71
9880.01
Net Sales
200933.20
245329.20
287005.35
(1.08)%
2.77%
3.44%
Graphical representation
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
INTERPRETATION
This ratio measures the relationship between net profit and net sales. The
main objective of computing this ratio is to determine the overall
profitability due to various factors such as operational efficiently, trading on
equity etc. net profit ratio shows companys net profit earn after paying all
kind of expenses i.e. tax and interest. In 2011-12 company was incurring
losses. In 2012-13 the net profit ratio is 2.77% it shows the company has
recovery & earned profit of rs6786.71 and in 2013-14 the ratio is 3.4%
which shows company has earned a more profit as compared to previous
year.
PARTICULAR
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
PAT
(2178.92)
6786.61
9880.01
NET WORTH
28689.63
32857.45
39537.08
RETURN ON
EQUITY(ROE)
(7.5947)%
20.6548%
24.9892%
Graphical representation
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
INTERPRETATION
This ratio indicates the firms ability of generating profit per rupee of equity
shareholders fund. Higher the ratio the more efficient the management and
utilization of equity shareholders fund.RSWM LTD ROE ratio has been
consistently increasing after 2011-12 which shows that the firm has been
efficiently utilizes the fund of equity share.
PARTICULAR
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
PAT
(217892000)
678661000
988001000
NUMBER OF EQUITY
SHARE
23148689
23148689
23148689
EARNING PER
SHARE
(9.41)
29.32
42.68
Graphical representation
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
INTERPRETATION
This ratio measures the earnings available to equity shareholders on a per
share basis. In general, higher the figure, better it is and vice versa. While
interpreting this ratio, it must be seen whether there is any increase in equity
shareholders funds as a result of retained earning without any change in
numbers of outstanding share. In 2011-12 the company was incurring loss
therefore the EPS was negative (9.41). In 2012-13 company has earned huge
amount of profit thus EPS has increase to 29.32 per share. Similarly 2013-14
because company has earned good amount of profit thus EPS has increase to
42.68 per share from 29.32 previous year.
Particulars
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
CGS
41289.56
65933.53
75134.67
Average inventory
59578.29
52540.635
58784.25
0.6930
1.2549
1.2781
Graphical representation
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
INTERPRETATION
The objective of computing this ratio it to determine the efficiency with
which the inventory is utilizing this ratio establishes a relationship between
cost of good and inventory. It indicates the speed with which the inventory is
converted into sales. In 2011-12 the ratio is 0.6930 while in 2012-13 and
2013-14 the ratio is 1.3 approximately same. Thus as compare to 2011-12
inventory turnover ratio is higher in 2013 and 2014 which indicate that
inventory has been efficiently used and converted into sales.
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
198699.75
245329.20
287005.35
Average Debtors
18441.25
21607.47
23686.27
DEBTORS
TURNOVER RATIO
10.77
11.35
12.11
Graphical representation
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
INTERPRETATION
IT indicates the number of times the debtors are turn over during the year. Generally
higher the value of debtor turnover the more efficient is the management of the
debtors/sales or more liquid are the debtors similarly lower debtors turnover implies in
efficient management of debtors/sales and less liquid debtors. In 2011-12 ratio is 10.77
times but in 2012-13 its 11.33 and in 2013-14 it increase to 12.11 times. Thus it show
debtor are more liquid and it implies that company has efficient management of debtors.
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
360/debtors turnover
ratio
360/10.77
360/11.35
360/12.11
Average collection
period(approx)
33 days
32 days
30 days
Graphical representation
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
INTERPRETATION
The Debt Collection Period Represent The Average Number Of Days For
Which A Firm Has To Wait Before Its Receivable Are Converted Into Cash.
Therefore In 2011-12 Collection Period Was 33 Days. IN 2012-13 collection
period reduced to 32 days and It Has Decreased To 30 Days In 2013-14
Which Shows That Debtors Are Converted In To Cash In Average collection
Period Of 30 Days.
Particulars
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
132484.97
149953.95
173416.89
average creditor
3633.94
411.14
3001.00
Creditor turnover
ratio
44.14
36.43
47.72
Graphical representation
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
INTERPRETATION
This ratio establishes a relationship between net credit purchase and average
trade creditors. The objective of computing this ratio is to determine the
efficiency with which the creditors are managed. In 2011-12 the ratio is
44.14 times it shows that creditors are manage efficiently and in 2012-13 the
ratio is 36.43 and increase to 47.72 times in 2013-14 it implies that
companys pays its obligations to the creditors as early as possible according
to the 2013-14.
AVERAGE PAYMENT PERIOD=360/CREDITOR TURNOVER RATIO
Particulars
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
360/creditor turnover
ratio
360/44.14
360/36.43
360/47.72
Average payment
period (appx.)
8 days
10 days
8 days
Graphical representation
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
INTERPRETATION
The average payment period ratio represents the average number of days
taken by the firm to pays its creditors. Generally, lower the ratio, the better is
the liquidity position of the firm and higher the ratio, the firm and
consequently larger the benefit reaped from credit supplier.2011-12 the
average collection period is 8 days it shows that the creditors paid
immediately. The company has maintained its average payable period
between 8 to 10 days. So it is good for the company as well as creditors
point of view.
CHAPTER 6
FINDINGS,
SUGGESTIONS
AND CONCLUSION
CHAPTER 7
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY