Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
3
Specimen preparation
F L M ATTHEWS
3.1
Introduction
There are a number of subsidiary, but vital, issues that are complementary
to the main activity of mechanical testing. These issues, taken together, constitute the preparatory work required to produce test specimens of adequate quality. If insufficient attention is given to any of these activities, the
results from a particular test could be invalidated. The following remarks
relate to the use of specimens of high performance composites fabricated
from continuous preimpregnated fibres, the subject of this text. The four
stages considered are: laminate production; quality checking; specimen
manufacture; application of strain gauges. The final three stages would, of
course, apply to any material.
3.2
Laminate production
Thin sheets, known as laminates, usually 1 or 2 mm thick for coupon specimens, are manufactured from layers of fibres preimpregnated with partially
cured (if epoxy-based) resin prepreg. The matrix is usually an epoxy, but
BMI (bismaleimide) and thermoplastic prepregs are also used. It should be
noted that the following discourse relates mainly to epoxy prepregs (owing
mainly to their popularity). It should, however, be pointed out that the
preparation of laminates with thermoplastic matrices is in many ways
a similar but more straightforward process, because the plastic resin is
not required to cure, but simply melts at a suitably high temperature and
resolidifies when cooled.
A single prepreg layer is usually 0.125 or 0.25 mm thick and the fibres are
either continuous and parallel (unidirectional), or in the form of a woven
fabric. The prepreg is supplied as tape, normally 0.3 m wide (but suppliers
having width preferences, woven materials being generally wider than unidirectional products), sandwiched between protective layers of paper or
plastic and wound on a reel. If epoxy, the prepreg should be kept in a freezer
36
Specimen preparation
37
38
Peel ply
Pressure plate
Vacuum connection
Melinex
Sealing
tape
Top plate
Melinex
Bleed cloth
Peel ply
Laminate
Peel ply
Perforated PTFE
Peel ply
Frame
Baseplate
Vacuum connection
Pressure vessel
Baseplate
Pressure connection
Diaphragm
Top plate
Laminate, etc.
Frame
Vacuum connection
Specimen preparation
3.3
39
Quality checking
3.4
Specimen manufacture
40
Specimen preparation
41
is used it should be tough, with a greater failure strain than that of the material under test. CRAG2 specifies that it should have a shear strength greater
than 30 MPa. Special adhesives would be preferred for fatigue testing or
high temperature work. An incidental advantage in using GFRP end-tabs
is that the material is translucent and any gaps in the glue film can be seen
by visual examination. Even if the joint is strong enough to withstand specimen failure loads, gaps in the glue line can result in uneven stresses in the
underlying composite and cause premature failure.1
The crucial issue when bonding is to ensure that both the specimen and
the tabs are properly prepared. Composites need to be degreased and
abraded to remove all traces of release agent transferred during moulding.
This procedure should be followed by wiping with a solvent. Similar procedures should be followed when making bonded joints. In addition to
degreasing, aluminium alloy tabs need to be etched in chromic acid or
phosphoric acid.
3.5
Strain gauging
High gauge resistances are desirable because high voltages (24 V) with
low current can then be used; this improves hysteresis effects and zero
load stability.
If possible, use gauges with lead wires attached, or solder wires to the
gauge before installation; this should avoid soldering damage to the
composite.
Ideally the pattern of the autoclave scrim cloth should be removed
before gauge installation; this is particularly important if contact adhesives are used.
Corrections may be necessary to gauge transverse sensitivity effects;
errors of over 100% between actual and measured strains can be
obtained.
Gauges must be precisely aligned; errors of 15% can result from a 2
misalignment. There is no universally acceptable way of ensuring alignment. The scrim cloth pattern can be misleading. Sometimes C-scan
after installation can be useful, or checking with failure surfaces after
fracture.
42
6
3.6
Summary
In summary, it is essential that careful and consistent procedures are followed at every stage of specimen production. Failure to do so will throw
doubt on the validity of any data generated.
References
1. P W Manders and I M Kowalski, The effect of small angular fiber misalignments
and tabbing techniques on the tensile strength of carbon fiber composites, 32nd
International SAMPE Symposium, Anaheim, CA, USA, eds R Carson, M Burg
and K J Kjoller, Society for the Advancement of Material and Process
Engineering, Covina, CA, USA, 1987.
2. P T Curtis (Ed), CRAG Test Methods for the Measurement of the Engineering
Properties of Fibre Reinforced Plastics, Royal Aircraft Establishment, Farnborough, UK, Technical Report 88012, 1988.
3. M E Tuttle and H F Brinson, Resistance Foil Gauge Technology as Applied to
Composite Materials, Report No. VPI-E-83-19, Department of Engineering
Science and Mechanics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University,
Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA, June 1983.