Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
2, MARCH/APRIL 1997
383
I. INTRODUCTION
fault
time
total
total
;
(rad/s);
current magnitude (kA rms);
(s);
leakage inductance (henry);
leakage capacitance (farad).
384
385
TABLE
OF
GENERAL-
TABLE I
DEFINITE-PURPOSE TRV RATINGS
AND
their capacitance to ground. Items which tend to cause adverse TRV conditions are power transformers and short-circuit
current-limiting reactors.
The TRV study considered various operating and fault
conditions and an analysis was made for each configuration.
Since the TRV requirement is a function of the three-phase
fault current level, it was also calculated for each condition.
For each breaker performing an opening operation, the threephase short-circuit current level, peak TRV voltage (E ),
and time to peak (T ) were calculated. These calculations
were then compared to the TRV ratings of the breaker in
question. If the calculated value of T was equal to or higher
than the breaker rating, then the application was considered
appropriate. If the calculated value was lower than the breaker
rating, then the condition was addressed further. The parameter
E was not given significant consideration since the value T is
a more profound parameter when considering the performance
of the breaker.
Fourteen cases were simulated; the results are summarized
in Table II.
The calculated TRV (kV) vsersus time response curves were
generated for each case. The response curves for Case 1 and
Case 2 are shown in Figs. 7 and 8.
Case 1 represents a fault on Bus 1 to be interrupted by one
of the main breakers, 52-1. In this case, the TRV is generated
essentially by the transformer. As can be seen, this curve is
a typical damped one-minus-cosine wave form. The EMTP
program results indicated that for Case 1 the time T is in
the order of 12 s.
Case 2 is interesting because the TRV response at the
breaker is a composite of three TRV sources, both transformers
and the reactor. As can be seen in Fig. 8, the response has a
double frequency, one as a result of the transformers and the
other the result of the reactor. In this case, the first minor peak
386
*Capacitors shown dotted were added as a result of this study to correct TRV.
Fig. 6. EMTP study one-line diagram.
SUMMARY
TABLE II
OF EMTP RESULTS
ANALYSIS
OF
387
TABLE III
CIRCUIT BREAKER PERFORMANCE
388
REFERENCES
[1] S. R. Lambert, Circuit breaker transient recovery voltage, in IEEE
Tutorial Course: The Application of Power Circuit Breakers, 93-EHO388-9-PWR.
[2] IEEE Standard Rating Structure for AC High-Voltage Circuit Breakers
Rated on a Symmetrical Current Basis, ANSI/IEEE Standard C37.041979 (Reaff 1988).
[3] AC High-Voltage Circuit Breakers Rated on a Symmetrical Current BasisPreferred Ratings and Related Required Capabilities, ANSI Standard C37.06-1987.
[4] IEEE Standard Test Procedure for AC High-Voltage Circuit Breakers
Rated on a Symmetrical Current Basis, ANSI/IEEE Standard C37.091979 (Reaff 1988).
[5] IEEE Application Guide for Transient Recovery Voltage for AC HighVoltage Circuit Breakers Rated on a Symmetrical Current Basis,
ANSI/IEEE Standard C37.011-1979.
[6] R. K. Smith, Tests show ability of vacuum circuit breaker to interrupt
fast transient recovery voltage rates of rise of transformer secondary
faults, 94 TD 026, T-PWRD. Jan. 1995, Westinghouse Science &
Technology Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15235 USA.
[7] W. G. Heinmiller, R. W. Katterhenry, S. R. Lambert, T. W. Stringer,
Transient recovery voltage failures of two 15kV indoor oilless circuit
breakers, IEEE T-PAS, pp. 2578-2584, Aug. 1982.