Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Contents
CompanyDetails
CompanyManufacturingProcess
ENCONEfforts Last3Year
SpecificEnergyConsumption/Benchmarking
InnovativeProjects
CDMProjects
InvolvementofEmployees,TeamWorkInEncon,
Monitoring&ReportingFormatsandImplementation
Methodologies
ENCON FutureProjects
ProjectImplementationasCA/PAforISO9001/14001
UtilizationofAlternativeEnergySource&Waste
ImplementationOnEnergyFrontAmongstAssociates
(Vendors/Suppliers,Contractors,Customersetc.)
Awards&Accolades
Co-Pack
9 Plants
CBO
24 Plants
Sparkling RGB
Juice RGB
Sparkling PET
Juice Hotfill
Juice Tetra Pack
Retail water
Bulk Water
Cans
32
10 (2 cold fill)
24
6
3
11
4
1
300 X 1
120 X 1
600 X 2
120X1
ZeroDischargePlant
WaterNeutralPlant
Soft Water
RGB Empty
Bottle Handling
& Conveying
Treated Water
Bottle
Washing
Syrup
Processing
CO2
OR
Beverage
Processing
PET Bottle
Blowing &
Conveying
Filling / Crowning /
Capping
Conveying & Fulls
Handling
Energy Contribution
Contribution ( MJ )
Power Sourced
40%
53%
Contribution ( MJ )
42%
Electrical
HSD
Furnace Oil
5%
2%
Contribution ( Cost )
7%
4%
Briqueete
Thermal
58%
Power-Variable
2%
Fuel-Briq
20%
Power-Fix
Focus
Area
Fuel - FO
HSD - DG Set
67%
Two Areas
Contributes 87%
Of The Total
Power & Fuel
Cost
1%
1%
1%
1%
13%
4%
4%
13%
5%
5%
13%
5%
7%
7%
10%
80-20
Technique
Sr.
No.
Year
Nos. of En-con
Projects
Implemented
Average
Investment
Saving
Pay Back
(Rs. INR MM) (Rs. INR MM)
(Months)
2011-2012
19
20.7
42.6
2010-2011
13
2.7
29.3
2009-2010
13
5.4
14.1
Total
45
28.8
88.7
Project Description
3.0
10
1.1
10
Nil
0.6
0.6
0.5
15
0.13
0.4
0.25
0.3
10
0.08
0.3
0.04
0.02
0.2
0.2
2
1
0.04
0.2
11
0.1
0.2
11
12
13
0.02
0.01
0.1
0.04
4
3
5.4
14.1
4.6
7
8
9
10
Total
Project Description
1
2
12
13
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Total
1.1
1.4
1.0
16
0.4
0.15
0.3
0.15
0.2
0.02
0.1
0.04
0.04
0.1
0.1
6
8
Nil
0.1
0.02
0.1
0.01
0.03
2.73
32.03
Project Description
1
2
10
2.1
27
3.4
4
7
0.1
2.7
0.5
2.0
24
0.2
1.2
1.2
0.9
16
1.2
0.9
16
0.7
11
0.4
1.0
10
Nil
0.6
Project Description
11
12
0.1
0.2
0.6
0.5
2
5
13
0.1
0.3
14
0.15
0.2
15
0.08
0.1
16
0.05
0.1
17
0.05
0.1
18
0.03
0.1
19
0.02
0.1
20.7
42.6
5.8
Total
13.2
13.1
12.5
12.4
0.90
0.86
0.82
12.6
0.83
0.76
0.72
12.1
11.9
0.72
0.66
0.62
2008
2009
2010
2011
0.92
164.4
86.5
93.7
2008
2009
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Continuous Improvement In
Electricity & Furnace Oil
Usage Ratio
113.6
2010
2011
Significant Reduction In
Utilization of Overall Energy
Year After Year
Bench Marking
Q-Spec Report ( Coca-Cola India )
Electricity Usage Ratio ( Beverage of Litre / Unit )
26.0
25.3
Consistently
Achieving 1st
Rank In HCCBL
India, Since
Last 1 Year
24.0
23.5
23.3
22.7
22.7
22.5
21.9
21.0
21.8
0.66
0.11
0.10
0.60
0.40
0.40
0.20
0.00
Project #:
Piyush Shah
Executive Sponsor:
Rajeev Chawla
Project Costs: (include required capital, expenses)
- Capital:
[1]Mahesh Kore
[2]Parthiv
[3] Dilipkumar
[4] Rizwan
[5] Bhavik
[6] Hemendra
[7] Ajay
[8]Manoj Pal
[9] Viral
- Expenses:
INR 1.8 Mn
Mission/Project Overview:
- KPI's:
Optimization of PET blowing pressure & Unload power of 40 bar air
compressor to achieve energy efficiency.
Assumptions:
Project Milestones:
Dependencies:
Process Flow
. . . Gaining Process Understanding
Compressor
30 kg/cm2
Preforms
Receiver
Dryer
Blow Molds
Blowing
Filter
3 Way Valve
Bottles
Parameters Change
Before
After
Blowing Pressure
30
26
15
12
62
58
Layer Temperatures
( 1 to 9 )
Based On Weight
Distribution
Qualityparameterfoundwithinrange
Processcapabilitychecked&achieved
forcriticalqualityparameters.
Quality Parameter
Acceptable Range
Brimful
Base Weight
Upper Shoulder Weight
Label Panel Weight
Wall Thickness - Minimum
Gate Area - Minimum
Base Clearance - Minimum
623.34 +/- 5 ML
5 to 5.5 GM
10 to 11 GM
11 to 12 GM
0.3 MM
1.3 MM
3.5 MM
No Crack For 20
Minute
M A I
Process Controls
. . . Sustaining The Gains
Recipechangessavedonblowingmachine,oldreciperemoved
Checkprocesscapabilityforcriticalqualityparametersatregularinterval.
Processparametersspecificationchartdisplayonthemachine.
Processparameterslocked Accesstochangelimitedtoauthorized
person.
M A I
Units
2011
Ratio Prod - Cs
Units
2012
Ratio Prod - Cs
Units
Saving
Ratio
Saving :
2011 Vs. 2010 : Rs. 3.9 Million
2012 Vs. 2011 :
2011 vs 2012 vs
2010
2011
-29%
-20%
Project Summary
Objective :
Target :
Achieved:
Optimization of blowing pressure @ 26 kg/cm2
After
Raw Syrup
(Flow Rate
5KLPH)
Temp.(45C)
Glycol
return from
process at
+1C
Glycol
supply to
process at
-2C
Ready Syrup
at 25C
Chilled water
to process at
+6C
Raw Syrup
5 KL System
Total
5000
45
25
25
33
83
58
174
38
95
67
200
28
70
49
148
74405
161210
130208
365823
5,39,435
11,68,775
30,000
1
40,000
0.4
40000
9,44,010 26,52,220
30,000
0.4
1,00,000
0.5
Cooling Water
From PHE At 36C
After
Cooling Water
Supply @ 55m /
hr
Cooling water to
PHE at 32C
Chilled water from
PHE @ 12C
Chilled Water
Supply @
40m /hr
Process water
flowrate 55m /hr
Before
Chilled Water
After
Cooling Water
25000
42
36
49.6
25000
42
36
49.6
0.9
0.2
44
12
31.7
5000
158651
11,50,218
2,00,000
2.1
Compressed Air
@ 3 Bar
After
25
6.5
2.2
1.9
4.6
30000
138000
10,00,500
Investment ( Rs. )
4,00,000
4.8
Value
Briquette Used ( Kg )
30,93,500
Briquette Cost ( Rs )
1,70,14,250
10,31,167
4,43,40,167
Saving ( Rs. )
2,73,25,917
Value
30,93,500
74,244
24,748
10,64,164
Saving (Rs.)
10,64,164
75%
95%
89%
Agro Waste
73%
Fossil Foil (
HSD, Furnace Oil )
50%
25%
27%
11%
5%
0%
2010
2011
2012
Responsibility
Piyush Shah
Abhishek
Sikligar
Nimish Nikam
Hemendra
Rawat
Vaibhav
Deshpande
Rahul Saxena
Saurabh
Trivedi
Hemul Joshi
Manish Singh
Sachin
Parashar
Rajneesh
Sharma
Workshop :ParticipationInEnergyConservationWorkshop
Review :Daily,Weekly,Fortnightly&MonthlyReviewofActionPlan/
Projects,FurtherPlanning
Display :Temperature&PressureSetPoints,Loading/UnloadingSetpoints
PeriodicCirculationofDosandDontsForTheEffectiveUseofEnergy
Team work
Sr.
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Proposal
Saving
Extent of
Potential Achieved
Source Of EnImplementation Investment
Year Manpower
( Rs. MM Saving
Con Idea
Progress
( Rs. MM)
Involved
Per ( Rs. MM )
Annum )
Implemented
Nil
0.02
Implemented
Nil
0.02
Implemented
0.1
0.15
Implemented
Nil
Implemented
0.04
0.06
Implemented
0.01
0.03
Implemented
0.2
0.25
Implemented
0.005
0.04
Implemented
0.08
0.1
Team work
Sr.
No.
Proposal
13
14
15
2012
Implemented
0.1
0.12
Workmen
2012
Implemented
0.1
0.12
Middle
Management
2012
Implemented
0.1
0.12
Supervisor
2012
Implemented
0.04
0.08
Top
Management
2012
Implemented
0.2
0.2
Supervisor
2012
Under
Consideration
0.5
0.7
Middle
Management
Middle
Management
18 Solar Lighting
Top
Management
16
Saving
Achieved
Extent of
Implementation Investment Potential ( Rs.
Saving
Year Manpower
Progress
( Rs. MM) MM Per Annum
( Rs. MM )
Involved
)
2012
Implemented
0.7
0.8
2012
Implemented
0.1
0.25
Under
Consideration
15
7.5
2013
Every Shift
Every Shift / Daily / Monthly
Daily / Monthly / Yearly
Daily
Daily
Daily / Monthly / Yearly
Daily / Monthly / Yearly
Weekly
Fortnightly
Monthly
Monthly
Quarterly
Target
Date
1-Feb
2-Feb
HP Air
LP Air
Date
RGB2 %
Opp
HS PET 1
HS PET 1 CSD
CSD
% Opp.
(KWH)
1-Apr-12 331
21%
0%
640
12%
2-Apr-12 231
13%
0%
0%
Monitoring
Step-1:
Categorization
Audit
Innovation
Step-2 : Data
Collection
Step-3 : 80:20
Technique
Execution
Sequence
Bench Mark
Audit ( Internal / External )
Analysis
Execution
Monitoring System
Online Suggestion
Analysis
Purpose
Gap Identification
Identify Potential Saving To Close Gap
Evolution or Project
Improvement
Substance
Value Creation
Step-4 :
DMAIC
Approach
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Project Description
Investment
Saving
( Rs. MM ) ( Rs. MM Per Annum)
Pay Back
( Months )
0.2
0.4
0.1
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.15
0.2
10
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.08
0.1
0.01
0.1
0.01
0.1
37.13
42.32
10
Environmental Initiatives
Green Belts & Tree Plantation --- Across The Plant
Recycle
Bottle washer
Tertiary Treatment
Vacuum Pump
Recirculation
4R
Implementation
Reuse
Crate washing
Floor Cleaning
Toilet
Garden
Recharge
Create awareness
Bottle washer
Backwashing
3.38
2.97
3.00
2.60
2.39
2.20
1.90
1.80
1.6
1.40
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
20102011
Environmental Aspect
Action
1.Switch over from
ground water source to
surface water.
2.Installation of
Decaustizer.
Environmental
Impact/Improvement
Water consumption
reduced from 2.97 per
liter of beverage to 2.39
liter
20112012
Environmental Aspect
Action
Installation of UFRO
Scheme in Effluent
treatment plant to meet
requirement of utilities
UFRO SYSTEM
Environmental
Impact/Improvement
Water consumption
reduced from 2.97 per
liter of beverage to 1.9
liter
20112012
Environmental Aspect
Action
Environmental
Impact/Improvement
Water Neutral
Plant
Waste Utilization
Process Waste Water From Bottle Washing & CIP Is Being Treated
Through The State of Art Plant Consisting Pretreatment
( Aeration, Membrane Bio-Reactor), Post Treatment ( Reverse
Osmosis), MVRE, Crystallizer and Centrifuge
The Treated Water Quality Meets IS 14543 & IS 10500 Standards
Associates
Hindustan Coca-Cola Bangalore
KHS - Germany
Sidel - France
Philips - India
SKF - India
Ratna Construction
KHS - Germany
Grundfos - India
PPI - India
Energy Manager Group HCCBPL
Devki Engg.
Zenith Marketing / GEM
Trap
Certifications
ISO 14001:2004
ISO 18001:2007
ISO 22000:2005
PAS 220:2008
Awards
Reduction of Water Foot Print By Rain Maker / Waste Water
Treatment Plant Global Category
Thanks