Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
www.intechopen.com
334
Lm
Lp
Lp
(1)
(2)
The ratio Rldla is the relationship between the angular width of a principal tooth and the
magnet angular width. This ratio is responsible for the regulation of the principal tooth size
which has a strong influence on the electromotive force form.
Rldla
Atooth
Lm
(3)
The Rdid ratio is the relationship between the angular width of the principal tooth and the
angular width of the inserted tooth Atoothi . This relationship fixes the inserted tooth size.
Rdid
Atooth
Lm
(4)
Fig. 1. Permanent magnets motors with exterior rotor and interior rotor
www.intechopen.com
335
Symbol
M
ad
td
Tout
Pmmax
Tw
Vb
Vmax
kr
Value
1000 kg
3
4s
40C
21,635 kW
95C
30 km/h
100 km/h
0,44
7 A/mm2
Symbol
Bm
Bc
Btooth
a
km
Rcu
Mvt
Mva
Mvc
Q
Value
1,175 T
0,383 T
0,9 T
1,05
1%
17,2 10-9 m
0,004
7850 kg
7400 kg
8950 kg
1,1
www.intechopen.com
336
Dm e htooth
As
2
(5)
Dm e
Atooth lm
2
(6)
Where lm , Dm are the average motor length and the average motor diameter.
The inserted tooth section: Stoothi
Stoothi
Dm e
Atoothi lm
2
(7)
Ss
D e
1 2
lm
Atooth Atoothi m
2 N tooth
2
(8)
www.intechopen.com
Dm e htooth
As
2
(9)
Stooth
Dm e
Atooth lm
2
Stoothi
Dm e
Atoothi lm
2
337
(10)
D e
1 2
Atooth Atoothi m
lm
2 N tooth
2
(12)
The teeth height htooth of the PMSMIR and the PMSMER are expressed by equation 13 and 14
where N sph is the number of turns per phase, I n is the rated current and N teeth in the number
of teeth.
htooth
Dm e
Dm e
2
N teeth K r As 2
htooth
Dm e
Dm e
2
N teeth K r As 2
N sph .I n
(13)
N sph .I n
(14)
The stator yoke thickness hsy is obtained by the application of the flux conservation theorem,
where Btooth is the magnetic induction in the tooth.
hsy
BtoothStooth
2lm Bsy
(15)
In the rotor of the two structures, geometrical sizes are defined by:
The expression of the magnet height hm is the same one in the two structures. It is obtained
by the application of the Ampere theorem.
Where a is the air permeability and k fu is the flux leakage coefficient.
hm
a Be e
M(Ta )
Be
k fu
(16)
www.intechopen.com
(17)
338
hry
BeStooth
2 k fulm Bry
(18)
EMFi (t )
N sph lmDm Be sin
2
12
N sph lmDm Be sin
2
Tem (t )
sin Rldla
1 3
EMFi (t ) ii t
i 1
(19)
(20)
(21)
where EMFi , ii and m represent respectively the electromotive force, the current of the i
phase and the angular speed of the motor.
The motor rated current In is the ratio between the electromagnetic torque and the motor
electric constant.
In
Tem
Ke
(22)
N sph Lsp
In / 2
(23)
where Rco (Tw ) is the copper receptivity at the temperature of winding Tw and Lsp is the spire
average length (Ben Hadj et al., 2007).
www.intechopen.com
l
K / W
Ak
(24)
Rconduction
l
K / W
Ac h
339
(25)
Where l is the distance between the point masses and A is the interface area, k is the heat
conductivity, Ac is the cooling cross section between the two regions and h is the convection
coefficient calculated from proven empirical dimensionless analysis algorithms.
The heat capacitance is defined as follow:
C V c Ws / K
(26)
Where V is the volume, is the density and c is the heat capacity of the material. The
simplified stator for the thermal study of the two SMPMM structure are given by
figures 3 and 4, also the thermal model for the two structures are implemented in
MATLAB simulater where the different radius for the PMSMER dimensions are defined
as follow:
Rcarter R1 R f
e
hm hry ecarter
2
Rrotoryoke R2 R f
e
hm hry
2
Rmagnet R3 R f
R4 R f
e
hm
2
e
2
Rslot R5 R f
(27)
(28)
(29)
(30)
e
2
(31)
Rinsolator R6 R5 hs
(32)
R7 R5 hs tinsolator
(33)
R8 R7 hsy
(34)
The thermal resistances are calculated along the radial direction. The Ri radius are
calculated from dimensions of motor, where R f is the Bore raduis and tinsolator is the
thickness insulator.
The different radius for the PMSMIR dimensions are defined as follow:
R1 R f
www.intechopen.com
e
2
(35)
340
R2 R f
e
htooth
2
(36)
e
htooth tinsolator
2
(37)
e
htooth tisnolator hsy
2
(38)
e
htooth tinsolator hsy tcarter
2
(39)
R3 R f
R4 R f
R5 R f
www.intechopen.com
341
As described earlier, the thermal resistance values are automatically calculated from motor
dimensions and material data.
Figure 5 shows the thermal model in transient behaviour of the PMSMIR.
Rcoil
4 lmcoil
[1 - 2
R12
R
ln 2 ]
- R12 R1
R22
(40)
).
R3
R2
2insolm
ln
Rinso
(41)
Rinso-sy represents the contact thermal resistance between insolator and the stator yoke
1
( K .W ).
Rinso sy
1
300
2 R3lm
2ironlm
(42)
1
).
ln
R jco
www.intechopen.com
(43)
342
4 lmiron
1
[1 - 2
).
R32
R
ln 4 ]
2
2
R4 - R3 R3
Rsy ca represents the thermal resistance between stator yoke and the carter ( K .W
Rsy-ca
(44)
1
).
1
1500
2 R4lm
1
(45)
).
R5
R4
Rca
2calm
ln
(46)
Rext represents the convection thermal resistance between the carter and ambient air
1
( K .W ).
Rext
l
hSext
(47)
In the previous expression, Sext represents the outer surface of the motor and h is the heat
transfer coefficient between the carter and the ambient air. It can be between 20 and 40
1
2
1
2
K .W m for a motor with natural ventilation, and may exceed 80 K .W m for the motor
forced air.
To calculate the outer surface of SMPMM, we considered only the outer surface of the
cylinder with radius R5 and height lm (Gasc, 2004; Chan., 2004).
Sext 2 R5lm
(48)
The expressions of heat capacities of the PMSMIR are given by the following equations:
1
Ccoil represents the heat capacity of coil ( JK ).
Ccoil coVcoCth co
).
(51)
).
www.intechopen.com
(50)
).
C sy ironVsyCth iron
1
(49)
(52)
343
4 lmiron
R82
R
ln 7
1 2 2
2
R8
R
R
7
8
4 lm inso
Rcoil
1
4 lco
).
R
R72
ln 6
2 2
2
R7
R6 R7
(54)
).
R62
R
ln 5
1 2 2
R5 R62 R6
(55)
).
R1
2
R
2mag lm
ln
Rmag
(53)
(56)
R2
R3
Rry
2ironlm
).
ln
R1
R2
Rca
2calm
(57)
1
ln
www.intechopen.com
(58)
344
To calculate the outer surface of SMPMM, we considered only the cylinder outer surface
with radius R1 and the height lm .
Sext 2 R1lm
(59)
The expressions of heat capacities of the PMSMER are given by the following equations:
1
C mag represents the heat capacity of magnet ( JK ).
C mag magVmagCth mag
1
(60)
).
C ry ironVryCth iron
(61)
).
Ccoil coVcoCth co
(62)
).
(63)
).
C sy ironVsyCth iron
(64)
The below table presents the different thermal conductivities of materials (Jrmi, R., 2003)
Material
Copper (Coil)
Insolator
(Iron)Stator Yoke
Magnet
aluminium (Carter)
Conductivities
(Wm-1K-1)
co=5
inso =0.25
iron =25
mag =6.5
ca =180
Density
(Kgm-3)
co = 8953
inso = 1200
iron = 7650
mag = 7400
alu = 2787
www.intechopen.com
www.intechopen.com
345
346
Moreover, we always look to get a permissible values of coil temperature, based on the
proper choice of motors geometric parameters in order to ensure a good compromise
between geometric dimensioning and thermal modeling motor.
7. Conclusion
In this paper, a thermal model of two SMPMM with interior rotor and exterior rotor was
realised, the intension to compare the evolution of the temperatures of different parts of the
two motor configurations and especially the modeling of temperature at the coil is made.
8. References
Chan, C. C. (2004). The Sate of the Art of Electric Vehicles, Journal of Asian Electric Vehicles,
Vol. 2, No. 2, pp.579-600.
Junak, J. ; Ombach, G. ; Staton, D. (2008). Permanent Magnet DC Motor Brush Transient
Thermal Analysis, 978-1-4244-1736-0/08/$25.00 2008 IEEE.
Dorrell David, G. ; Staton Malcolm, A. ; McGilp, I. (2006). Thermal Approach to High
Performance Specification, IEEE.
Magnussen, F. ; Lendenmann, H. (2005). Parasitic Effects in PM Machines with Concentrated
Windings, IAS 40th Annual Meeting Hong Kong , Volume 2, pp 1045- 1049.
Ben Hadj, N. ; Tounsi, S. ; Neji, R. and Sellami, F. (2007). Real coded Genetic algorithm for
permanent magnet motor mass minimization for electric vehicle application, 3rd
International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Intelligent
Informatics, Agadir-Morocco, March 28-30, 2007, pp.153-158.
Chin, Y.K.; Nordlund, E.; Staton, E.A. (2003). Thermal analysis Lumped circuit model and
finite element analysis. Sixth International Power Engineering Conference (IPEC),
pp. 952- 957.
Staton, D.A. (2001). Thermal analysis of electric motors and generators, Tutorial course at
IEEE IAS Annual Meeting, , Chicago, USA .
Holman, J.P. (1992). Heat Transfer, Seventh Edition, McGraw-Hill Publication.
Tounsi, S. (2006). Modlisation et optimisation de la motorisation et de lautonomie dun
vhicule lectrique. Thse de Doctorat, ENI Sfax
Jrmi, R. (2003). Conception de systmes htrognes en Gnie lectrique par optimisation
volutionnaire multicritre, thse de doctorat, Institut National Polytechnique de
Toulouse.
Gasc, L. (2004). Conception dun actionneur aimants permanents faibles ondulations de
couple pour assistance de direction automobile Approches par la structure et par la
commande, Thse de doctorat, Institut national Polytechnique de Toulouse.
www.intechopen.com
ISBN 978-953-307-477-1
Hard cover, 466 pages
Publisher InTech
How to reference
In order to correctly reference this scholarly work, feel free to copy and paste the following:
Naourez Ben Hadj, Jalila Kaouthar Kammoun, Mohamed Amine Fakhfakh, Mohamed Chaieb and Rafik Neji
(2011). A Comparative Thermal Study of Two Permanent Magnets Motors Structures with Interior and Exterior
Rotor, Electric Vehicles - Modelling and Simulations, Dr. Seref Soylu (Ed.), ISBN: 978-953-307-477-1, InTech,
Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/electric-vehicles-modelling-and-simulations/a-comparativethermal-study-of-two-permanent-magnets-motors-structures-with-interior-and-exterior-ro
InTech Europe
InTech China