Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
ASAIHL, Jakarta
2006
Table of Contents
Abstract
Rational
Public Participation in Flood Mitigation
Development of Flood Mitigation Matrix
- General Approaches
- Development Procedures
- Analysis Process
Stakeholders Participation Strategy
Summary of Policy Recommendation Analysis
Policy Recommendation of Stakeholder Participation in Flood
Mitigation
1
2
4
4
5
6
7
8
9
Table of Figures
Figure 1. General Approach Scheme
Figure 2. Development Procedures Scheme
4
6
Appendices
Appendix 1.
Appendix 2.
Dwinanti R. Marthanty
University of Indonesia
Page 1 of 11
ASAIHL, Jakarta
2006
Abstract
This paper introduces new paradigm in flood mitigation based on community approach.
Recently, flood mitigation efforts are still dominated by structural and temporal approach
through top-down direction. This study brought up comprehensive strategy that integrated
structural and non-structural method. Structural method is a physical approach that needs
higher costs like building flood controls. Whereas, non-structural method is a non-technical
approach, for instance increasing public awareness, that usually cost less. These approaches
based on Integrated Water Resource Management philosophies, water resource cannot be
studied without studying humanity and how to course water safely in the rainy season
meanwhile in the same time assuring water yield for the drought season. In assessing social
and community participation as part of studying humanity, this study employed Stakeholder
Analysis Method issued by World Bank in 1998. Flood and drought disaster happens in
causality relationship. If one occurs, another will occur as a consequence. Flood mitigation
is a life cycle process that consists of prevention, intervention and recovery stages. In each
stage, it has project phase and interacts with specific stakeholder. Flood mitigation cycle has
multidimensional aspects; time, space, activities, stakeholders, stage in project process, and
level of involvement. This study tried to identify all of the aspects and its interactions. As
conclusion, the chapter closes with participation strategy design and interaction between
stakeholders and level of involvement in flood mitigation.
Keywords: flood mitigation cycle, integrated water resource management, stakeholder
analysis, participation strategy, level of involvement.
Rational
In Indonesia, flood disaster sudden happens in brief and recurrent. The trend shows it
increasing in frequency and volume every year. Government has been executing many
structural solutions, but it results in unsatisfied resolution. For that reason, flood disaster
mitigation needs more effective approaches and strategies. This is agreed with Kwik Kian
Gie, Chairman of National Planning and Development Board (Bappenas), speech at Flood
Mitigation Workshop in Indonesia (Lokakarya Upaya Penanggulangan Banjir di Indonesia),
19 20 March 2002. He was bringing up the importance of comprehensive strategy of flood
mitigation based on community of which integrating structural and non-structural
approaches. These approaches included urban planning, structural-technical-physical efforts,
public awareness, and emergency responses. In the same time, he also stated that in
autonomous era, development funding was not only endowed from national government but
shared with local government and people as beneficiaries. 1
1
Dwinanti R. Marthanty
University of Indonesia
Page 2 of 11
ASAIHL, Jakarta
2006
Dwinanti R. Marthanty
University of Indonesia
Page 3 of 11
ASAIHL, Jakarta
2006
General Approaches
Point of view of
Public Participation
in flood mitigation
(Theoretical/ideal,
Legal Basis, Best
Practice, dll)
Global
Structure of
Information
Display
Information to
Decision Makers
Matrix of Ideal
StakeholderParticipation in
flood mitigation
Figure 1. General
Approach Scheme
Unesco, 2001
Dwinanti R. Marthanty
University of Indonesia
Page 4 of 11
ASAIHL, Jakarta
2006
Firstly, all aspect of public participation is considered from ideal condition theoretically
based on analysis studies and literatures. Then, each activity flood mitigation is litigated its
legal aspect compared to national policy. Afterward, real condition performs culture of local
wise that influence the local policy. All aspects are regarded as consideration that generates
global structure to represent whole information of public participation in flood mitigation.
Hence, matrix is a tool that presents the information to decision makers.
Matrix represents the relation between aspects in flood mitigation and management which are
life cycle, activities, project phase, and stakeholder involvement. Analysis process results in
recommendation policy of public participation in flood mitigation. Developing matrix
procedures is discussed afterward.
-
Development Procedures
All stakeholder activities in basin are identified into flood mitigation aspects that are
specified in time cycle, project phase, the involving process and customs. In figure 2, it is
depicted matrix development procedures for each activity.
LIFE CYCLE FLOOD MITIGATION
Prevention
IWRM
Response/
Intervention
Recovery
Project
Phase
Stakeholders
& Level of
Involvement
Measures
Stakeholders
Analysis
Flood Mitigation
Matrix
Development
Basin/Watershed
Policy
Mapping of
Public
Participation
Regulation in
flood mitigation
Mapping of
Public
Participation
Activities in
flood mitigation
Field Survey
Ideal
Stakeholder
Participation in
flood mitigation
Problems Mapping
Figure 2. Development
Procedures Scheme
Information for
Decision Makers
This procedure identifies general structure of flood mitigation as a mapping tool of various
involvement activities and aspects. The structure base on 3 (three) fundamental concept:
1) life cycle flood mitigation
2) project phase of flood mitigation activity
3) stakeholders and level of involvement
Dwinanti R. Marthanty
University of Indonesia
Page 5 of 11
ASAIHL, Jakarta
2006
From interaction made by all of activities, connection can be drawn for each aspect and form
the structure. It acts as an ideal/theoretical public participation map of flood mitigation.
General structure above will be compared to legal aspects and real condition (lesson-learned).
The gap between both will be considered as one of information material. It will perform as
mind frame in considering public participation in flood mitigation and basic material
information for Policy Recommendation.
-
Analysis Process
Dwinanti R. Marthanty
University of Indonesia
Page 6 of 11
ASAIHL, Jakarta
2006
Page 7 of 11
ASAIHL, Jakarta
2006
Dwinanti R. Marthanty
University of Indonesia
Page 8 of 11
ASAIHL, Jakarta
2006
The World Bank, 1996, The World Bank Participation Sourcebook, Environmentally Sustainable Development,
Washington, D.C.
Dwinanti R. Marthanty
University of Indonesia
Page 9 of 11
ASAIHL, Jakarta
2006
Targeted assistance type; stressing focus is to the casualties of the impact. These
people need access that could avoid them from disaster or at least minimizing
damages. Capacity building of human resources is a prior consideration so they can
share thoughts and experience in flood mitigation planning. Based on study, the
maximum level of ideal involvement is through collaboration in implementation
phase, whereas in evaluation phase could reach empowerment and partnership
level.
This statement is still preliminary recommendation and needs an intensive discussion among
decision makers.
Dwinanti R. Marthanty
University of Indonesia
Page 10 of 11
ASAIHL, Jakarta
2006
References
A Toolkit for Participation in Local Governance. Zonneveld L., Oxfam / Novib, 2000
governance:
an
analysis
of 40
cases,
Mrs.
C Pamfill,
2002,
The World Bank and Participation, the World Bank-Operations Policy Department, 1994
The World Bank Participation Sourcebook, Environmentally Sustainable Development, The World Bank,
Washington, D.C., 1996
Urban Surface Management, S. G. Walesh, John Wiley & Sons, 1989
Dwinanti R. Marthanty
University of Indonesia
Page 11 of 11