Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
wT,' <"
yrjW^ i^KU^nr.
JS 44C/SDNY
REV. 4/2014
The JS-44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor supplement the filing and service of
pleadings or other papers asrequired by law, except asprovided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the
Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is required for Mgof thajprk of Courtfor the purpose of
B t-^
ffY f j
JL J;
DEFENDANTS
V . *"/
>'' -
"~^ <>
"'-'.
Edward Kang
Kang Haggerty &Fetbroyt LLC, 123 S. Broad Street, Suite 1220, Philadelphia,
212.536.3901
PA19109
?1S.B?5.SHS0
*"
CAUSE OF ACTION (CITE THE U.S. CIVIL STATUTE UNDER WHICH YOU ARE FILING AND WRITE ABRIEF STATEMENT OF CAUSE) ... f
Has this action, case, or proceeding, or one essentially the same been previously filed in SDNY at any time? NeHresQjudge Previously Assigned
If yes, was this case Vol. [J Invol.
Dismissed. No
No [JO
Yes
Yes
NATURE OF SUIT
TORTS
PERSONAL INJURY
[ 1110
[ ]120
[ ]130
[]140
I 1150
[ ] 151
[ 1152
INSURANCE
MARINE
MILLER ACT
NEGOTIABLE
INSTRUMENT
RECOVERY OF
OVERPAYMENT &
ENFORCEMENT
OF JUDGMENT
MEDICARE ACT
RECOVERY OF
DEFAULTED
STUDENT LOANS
[ ] 310 AIRPLANE
[ ]315 AIRPLANE PRODUCT
LIABILITY
[ ] 330 FEDERAL
EMPLOYERS'
LIABILITY
[ ) 340 MARINE
[ ]345 MARINEPRODUCT
LIABILITY
( 1153
11160
[ MM
[ ]195
(1196
RECOVERY OF
OVERPAYMENT
OF VETERAN'S
BENEFITS
STOCKHOLDERS
SUITS
OTHER
CONTRACT
CONTRACT
PRODUCT
LIABILITY
FRANCHISE
[ ]240
[1245
[ ]290
21 USC 881
. , Bg0OTHER
LAND
CONDEMNATION
FORECLOSURE
RENT LEASE &
EJECTMENT
TORTS TO LAND
TORT PRODUCT
LIABILITY
ALL OTHER
REAL PROPERTY
ACCOMMODATIONS
28 USC 157
PROPERTY RIGHTS
SOCIAL SECURITY
LABOR
PROPERTY DAMAGE
STANDARDS ACT
[
[
[
[
[
]861 HIA(1395ff)
1862 BLACK LUNG (923)
J 863 DIWC/DIWW(405(g))
] 864 SSID TITLE XVI
] 865 RSI (405(g))
( ]740 RAILWAYLABORACT
[ ] 751 FAMILY MEDICAL
VACATE SENTENCE
28 USC 2255
[ ]462 NATURALIZATION
APPLICATION
[ ] 550 CIVILRIGHTS
[ l 555 PRISON CONDITION
[ ] 560 CIVIL DETAINEE
(
(
[
[
[
] 410 ANTITRUST
] 430 BANKS & BANKING
]450 COMMERCE
]460 DEPORTATION
J470 RACKETEER INFLU
ENCED & CORRUPT
ORGANIZATION ACT
(RICO)
RELATIONS
(Non-Prisoner)
[ ] 441 VOTING
I J442 EMPLOYMENT
[ ) 443 HOUSING/
[ ] 423 WITHDRAWAL
PERSONAL PROPERTY
REAPPORTIONMENT
28 USC 158
INJURY PRODUCT
LIABILITY
CIVIL RIGHTS
OTHER STATUTES
((400 STATE
[ ]720 LABOR/MGMT
BANKRUPTCY
[ ] 422 APPEAL
PRISONER PETITIONS
( ]220
( J 230
FORFEITURE/PENALTY
PRODUCT LIABILITY
REAL PROPERTY
t 1210
PERSONALINJURY
[ ] 367 HEALTHCARE/
PRODUCT LIABILITY
(EXCLVETERANS)
[ 1893 ENVIRONMENTAL
MATTERS
Defendant)
[ ] 895 FREEDOM OF
INFORMATION ACT
26 USC 7609
[ ] 896 ARBITRATION
[ ] 899 ADMINISTRATIVE
PROCEDURE ACT/REVIEW OR
APPEAL OF AGENCY DECISION
[ ]950 CONSTITUTIONALITY OF
STATE STATUTES
ACTIONS
CONDITIONS OF CONFINEMENT
[ ]446 AMERICANSWITH
DISABILITIES -OTHER
[ ) 448 EDUCATION
DEMAND $_
OTHER
fFSO?sW
JUDGE
DOCKET NUMBER
NOTE: You must alsosubmit at the time offiling the Statement ofRelatedness form (Form IH-32).
(PLACEAN x INONEBOXONLY)
Hi Original
ORIGIN
2 Removed from
Proceeding
Lj 3 Remanded Lj 4 Reinstated or
StateCourt
'
a. iip.rti.tr.pr.t.nt.d
Reopened
from
(Specify District)
fj 7 Appeal to District
Judge from
Litigation
Magistrate Judge
Appellate
Judgment
Court
I I b. Atleast on*
party Is pro se.
(PLACEAN x INONEBOXONLY)
1 U.S. PLAINTIFF
BASIS OF JURISDICTION
IF DIVERSITY, INDICATE
Q4 DIVERSITY
CITIZENSHIP BELOW.
PTF
DEF
[]1
[]1
[ ]2
[ ]2
PTF DEF
CITIZEN OR SUBJECT OF A
FOREIGN COUNTRY
[]3[]3
INCORPORATED or PRINCIPALPLACE
[ ]4 [ ]4
PTF
DEF
[ ]5
[ ]5
[]6
[]6
Foot Locker Corporate Services, Inc. and Foot Locker Retail, Inc.
112 West 34th Street
Delaware County
DEFENDANT(S) ADDRESS UNKNOWN
REPRESENTATION IS HEREBY MADE THAT, AT THIS TIME, I HAVE BEEN UNABLE, WITH REASONABLE DILIGENCE, TO ASCERTAIN
RE9IBENCE ADDRESSES OF THE FOLLOWING DEFENDANTS:
Check one:
Q WHITE PLAINS
\x\ MANHATTAN
(DO NOT check either box if this a PRISONER PETITION/PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS
COMPLAINT.)
DATE 1/15/2015
SIGNATURE OF AJTORNEX/O'f/RECORD
RECEIPT #
4^"^ IJ
MAG.,
tt
is so Designated.
Yr. 1994
i'-'i.ii l.4iJ
i'-^sj
Plaintiffs,
against
o'';
COMPLAINT
CO
Plaintiffs Foot Locker Corporate Services, Inc. ("Foot Locker Corporate Services") a|td
Foot Locker Retail, Inc. ("Foot Locker Retail"), collectively "Plaintiffs," by and through their
undersigned counsel, K&L Gates LLP, for their Complaint against Vizant Technologies, LLC
("Vizant") allege as follows:
NATURE OF THE ACTION
1.
This is an action for knowing, willful, and intentional violations of several federal and
state intellectual property laws and for breach of contract. As further detailed herein, Vizant,
- infringed the copyright in the iconic "Foot Locker Striper," a well-known graphical work that
is a registered work of authorship with the U.S. Copyright Office.
Additionally, and in
contravention of the aforementioned written agreement, Vizant improperly reproduced and used
in commerce various federally registered service marks owned by Foot Locker Retail. Vizant's
commercial use of the registered service marks violates Sections 32 and 43(a) of the Lanham
Act, and New York's unfair competition law. Finally, Vizant breached its written agreement
with Foot Locker Corporate Services by engaging in the aforementioned acts of infringement,
and asserting objectively baseless claims for amounts due and owing under the agreement.
Plaintiffs seek damages, injunctive relief, and recovery of attorneys' fees and costs due to
Vizant's wanton, egregious, and oppressive conduct.
PARTIES. JURISDICTION. AND VENUE
2.
Plaintiff Foot Locker Corporate Services is a corporation organized and existing under
the laws of the State of Delaware, having its principal place of business in New York, New York
with an office in Camp Hill, Pennsylvania.
3.
Plaintiff Foot Locker Retail is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the
State of New York, having its principal place of business in New York, New York.
4.
Vizant is a limited liability company organized and existing under the laws of the State of
Delaware. Upon information and belief, members of Vizant are citizens of at least Pennsylvania
and New York.
5.
This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over the copyright infringement claim and the
Lanham Act claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338(a). This Court has supplemental
jurisdiction over the state law claims for unfair competition and breach of contract pursuant to 28
U.S.C. 1367.
6.
This Court has personal jurisdiction over Vizant because it has continuous and systematic
contacts with the State of New York and regularly transacts business in this State. Further,
Vizant has knowingly engaged in the acts of infringement, unfair competition, and breach of
contract described herein in this State, knowing those acts would cause harm in this State to one,
or both, of the Plaintiffs.
7.
8.
Plaintiffs are wholly owned subsidiaries of Foot Locker, Inc., the world's leading retailer
of athletic footwear and apparel, operating approximately 3,600 athletic retail stores in 21
countries in North America, Europe and Australia under the brand names, including without
limitation, "Foot Locker," "Footaction," "Lady Foot Locker," "Kids Foot Locker," and "Champs
Sports."
9.
Foot Locker Corporate Services owns a valid, enforceable, and registered copyright in the
Striper.
A true and correct copy of a screenshot from the Copyright Office's website,
10.
For decades, Foot Locker Corporate Services and its related entities have used this
copyrighted work in promotional and advertising campaigns to promote the Foot Locker goods
and services.
11.
Additionally, Foot Locker Retail owns an incontestable federal service mark registration
for the Foot Locker Striper design, U.S. Registration No. 1,591,435. Foot Locker Retail also
owns an incontestable federal service mark registration for the stylized design of the "Foot
Locker" word mark, U.S. Registration No. 1,032,592. These marks are collectively referred to
hereafter as the "Foot Locker Marks." True and correct copies of the U.S. Registrations for the
Foot Locker Marks are attached as Exhibit B.
12.
Plaintiffs have invested an enormous amount of time, money, and resources to promote
and develop the goodwill associated with the Foot Locker Marks. The Foot Locker Marks have
3
become widely recognized and associated as source identifiers for the goods and services offered
by Plaintiffs and their related entities.
locations where Plaintiffs' goods and services are offered, the Foot Locker Marks are
prominently promoted online. Plaintiffs are also actively engaged in promoting the Foot Locker
Marks via social media websites, such as Facebook and Twitter. The official Foot Locker
Facebook page has over 6 million likes, and the Foot Locker Twitter page has 1.08 million
followers.
13.
On May 31, 2013, Vizant (then known as P.E. Systems) and Foot Locker Corporate
Services entered into a written "Consulting Agreement." The parties also entered into a Mutual
Confidentiality Agreement.
Mutual Confidentiality Agreement are attached hereto as Exhibit C. On information and belief,
in 2013, P.E. Systems changed its name to Vizant Technologies, LLC. This name change did
not alter any of the legal obligations owed by P.E. Systems, LLC to Foot Locker Corporate
Services.
14.
The Consulting Agreement was for services related to merchant processing fees paid by
Foot Locker Corporate Services and its affiliates when consumers use charge cards to pay for
merchandise at Plaintiffs' retail locations.
15.
The Consulting Agreement provides as follows: "Use of Trademarks, Logos and the
Like. [Vizant] agrees and acknowledges that [Vizant] shall not and is not authorized to utilize
[Foot Locker's] logos, trademarks or identity in any manner including without limitation, in
[Vizant's] Sales Presentation and [Foot Locker's] name in [Vizant's] regular listing of clients."
16.
Foot Locker Corporate Services became aware that Vizant breached the above portion of
the Consulting Agreement by prominently placing the Foot Locker Marks, including the Foot
Locker Striper work, on the top center portion of Vizant's "Our Clients" section of the Vizant
webpage. A true and correct copy of this portion of the Vizant.com website on July 31, 2014 is
attached as Exhibit D.
17.
Vizant also breached the "Use of Trademarks, Logos and the Like" provision of the
Consulting Agreement by listing Foot Locker, Kids Foot Locker, and Lady Foot Locker in
Vizant's "Retail Stores & Online Retail" client listing portion of the Vizant website. A true and
correct copy of this portion of the Vizant.com website on July 31, 2014 is attached as Exhibit E.
18.
As such, Vizant has used the Foot Locker Marks, or marks that are strikingly similar to
the Foot Locker Marks, including the Foot Locker Striper, as advertisements on its website,
Vizant.com. Vizant displayed the Foot Locker Marks on its website to purposefully advertise
that Plaintiffs endorse and sponsor Vizant's services.
19.
At no time was Vizant authorized to display the Foot Locker Marks or advertise that
Despite never having authority to use the Foot Locker Marks, Vizant used the Foot
Locker Marks to advertise a false designation of origin between Plaintiffs and Vizant.
21.
By utilizing the Foot Locker Marks on its website to advertise a false designation of
origin between Plaintiffs and Vizant, Vizant's use is likely to cause confusion, or to cause
mistake, or to deceive consumers.
22.
In addition to the aforementioned conduct, Vizant has made objectively baseless claims
for payment of monies due and owing under the Consulting Agreement. By way of example
only, Vizant issued Invoice No. FLCS-REF2 to Foot Locker Corporate Services for a
"Professional Services Fee" in the amount of $851,726.59. A true and correct copy of this
invoice is attached hereto as Exhibit F. Vizant had no reasonable basis for issuing this invoice
and even Vizant CEO Joseph Bizzarro has admitted the invoice was issued simply to "get Foot
Locker's attention."
23.
terminated the Consulting Agreement on July 31, 2014. A true and correct copy of this July 31,
2014 termination letter is attached hereto as Exhibit G. Shockingly, Vizant's concocted claims
for payment of monies did not stop, even after termination of the parties' agreement. Instead, on
August 31, 2014, Vizant issued Invoice No. FL-SC 9-12 to Foot Locker Corporate Services for
purported "Professional Services" provided by Vizant for an additional amount due and owing of
$503,863.85. A true and correct copy of this invoice is attached hereto as Exhibit H.
COUNT I
COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT
24.
Plaintiffs re-allege the allegations set forth in Paragraphs 1 through 23 above, as if fully
25.
Foot Locker Corporate Services is the author and owner of theFoot Locker Striper.
26.
The Foot Locker Striper is an original work of authorship and is copyrightable subject
27.
The Foot Locker Striper is registered with the United States Copyright Office under Reg.
28.
Unbeknownst to Foot Locker Corporate Services, Vizant reproduced a copy of the Foot
29.
501.
These acts constitute copyright infringement in violation of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C.
30.
31.
By reason of the foregoing, Plaintiff Foot Locker Corporate Services has been and will
continue to be irreparably harmed and damaged. Plaintiff Foot Locker Corporate Services'
remedies at law are inadequate to compensate for this harm and damage.
COUNT II
32.
Plaintiffs re-allege the allegations set forth in Paragraphs 1 through 31 above, as if fully
33.
Foot Locker Retail owns valid and incontestable service mark rights in the Foot Locker
Marks, as registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office under Registration
Numbers 1,591,435 and 1,032,592.
34.
Vizant has used the Foot Locker Marks in commerce in connection with its online
advertisement of services.
35.
Vizant's use of the Foot Locker Marks is likely to cause confusion, or to cause mistake,
36.
Vizant has not been licensed or otherwise authorized to use the Foot Locker Marks, and
By reason of the foregoing, Plaintiff Foot Locker Retail has been and will continue to be
irreparably harmed and damaged. Plaintiff Foot Locker Retail's remedies at law are inadequate
to compensate for this harm and damage.
COUNT III
38.
Plaintiffs re-allege the allegations set forth in Paragraphs 1 through 37 above, as if fully
39.
Plaintiff Foot Locker Retail owns valid service mark rights in the Foot Locker Marks,
and both Plaintiffs Foot Locker Retail and FootLocker Corporate Services have a right to use the
Foot Locker Marks and have a beneficial interest therein.
40.
Vizant has used the Foot Locker Marks in commerce in connection with Vizant's online
41.
Vizant's use of the Foot Locker Marks in its online advertisement creates a false
designation of origin between Vizant and Plaintiffs in violation of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C.
1125(a).
42.
Vizant has not been licensed or otherwise authorized to use the Foot Locker Marks, and
43.
By reason of the foregoing, Plaintiffs have been and will continue to be irreparably
harmed anddamaged. Plaintiffs' remedies at law are inadequate to compensate for this harm and
damage.
COUNT IV
44.
45.
Plaintiff Foot Locker Retail owns valid service mark rights in the Foot Locker Marks,
and both Plaintiffs Foot Locker Retail andFoot Locker Corporate Services have a right to use the
Foot Locker Marks and have a beneficial interest therein.
46.
Vizant has used the Foot Locker Marks in commerce in connection with its online
47.
Vizant's use of the Foot Locker Marks in its online advertisement is likely to cause
48.
Vizant's use of the Foot Locker Marks constitutes bad faith because Vizant used the Foot
Vizant had actual knowledge that it was prohibited from using the Foot Locker Marks but
50.
Thus, Vizant's actions constitute unfair competition in violation of New York common
law.
51.
By reason of the foregoing, Plaintiffs have been and will continue to be irreparably
harmed and damaged. Plaintiffs' remedies at law are inadequate to compensate for this harm and
damage.
COUNT V
52.
Plaintiffs re-allege the allegations set forth in Paragraphs 1 through 51 above, as if fully
53.
Plaintiff Foot Locker Corporate Services and P.E. Systems LLC, now Vizant, entered
54.
P.E. Systems changed its name to Vizant Technologies, LLC in 2013. This name change
did not alter any of the legal obligations owed by P.E. Systems, LLC to Foot Locker Corporate
Services.
55.
The Consulting Agreement provides that all provisions of the agreement will be governed
56.
The Consulting Agreement provides that "[Vizant] agrees and acknowledges that
[Vizant] shall not and is not authorized to utilize [Foot Locker's] logos, trademarks or identity in
any manner including without limitation, in [Vizant's] Sales Presentation and [Foot Locker's]
name in [Vizant's] regular listing of clients."
57.
Vizant materially breached the Consulting Agreement when it prominently placed the
Foot Locker Marks, including the Foot Locker Striper work, on the top center portion of Vizant's
"Our Clients" section of the Vizant webpage.
58.
Vizant also breached the Consulting Agreement when it listed Foot Locker, Kids Foot
Locker, and Lady Foot Locker in Vizant's "Retail Stores & Online Retail" client listing portion
of the Vizant website.
59.
Vizant also breached its implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing by making
objectively baseless claims for payment of monies due and owing under the Consulting
Agreement as described herein. By making these baseless claims for payment, Vizant did not
cooperate with Foot Locker Corporate Services so that Foot Locker Corporate Services could
obtain the full benefit of performance from Vizant.
60.
Plaintiff Foot Locker Corporate Services performed its obligations under the Consulting
Agreement.
61.
breaches of contract, including but not limited to loss of licensing fees and damage to Plaintiff
Foot Locker Corporate Service's goodwill and reputation.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs pray that this Court enter judgment in their favor on each and
every claim for relief set forth above and award them relief including, but not limited to, the
following:
A.
That Vizant be permanently enjoined from infringing the Foot Locker Striper
copyright;
10
B.
That Vizant be permanently enjoined from infringing the Foot Locker Marks,
creating a false designation of origin between Plaintiffs and Vizant, and unfairly
competing with Plaintiffs;
C.
That Vizant be ordered to pay damages, including but not limited to Vizant's
profits and Plaintiffs' actual damages for Vizant's copyright and service mark
That the damages for Vizant's violation of the Lanham Act be trebled under 15
U.S.C. 1117;
E.
That Vizant be ordered to pay damages for its breaches of contract against Foot
F.
That Vizant be ordered to pay Plaintiffs' costs and attorneys' fees in this action
G.
Awarding such other relief as the Court may deemjust and proper.
JURY DEMAND
K&L GATES
Eric A. Prager
Sarah P. Kenney
599 Lexington Avenue
New York, New York 10022
Tel: (212) 536 3900
Fax:(212)536-3901
eric.prager@klgates.com
sarah.kenney@klgates.com
11
12
application to be filed)
Suite 300
Spokane, WA 99201-5102
Tel: 509.624.2100
Fax: 509.456.0146
mike.keyes@klgates.com
Services, Inc.
f
i
Int. CI.: 42
T .
United States Patent and Trademark Office Registered Apr. io, 1990
SERVICE MARK
PRINCIPAL REGISTER
CORPORATION)
233 BROADWAY
NEW YORK, NY 10279
MERCE 1-0-1988.
RETAIL
SPORTS
APPAREL
AND
Int. CI.: 42
SERVICE MARK
Principal Register
10007
eetn*"M"*mwT?ff"*
!^^f.*^^f,*W^^*,w*B,,,^i*mid,',,, entered into, efeftral bdste executed Mtow, by and between P.E. Systems. UC rPEST, aDelaware
Umted UabUty Company, fecatad at 2S Wart Mah Avenue, Suite 400, Spokane, WafMngton 9noMHU and Foot loekar Corporate Services. Inc ratam,
faceted at9S*3 Smote* ftmryfW.Camp ,** 17011. PCS aryiaiar*{omtyfrfMtdto.sdM-pitttas-indlndMdutlyK-Priy'
WHERfM.PBtjerie^mtltobilneofpr^^
WHEREAS, clientdestouto have PES perform Consulting Services for atom's PaynsarrtProcasdngCosts,
NOW, IHERfPOW, for (ood ind valuable coraidaratkia. the receipt and sufficiency ofwhich Is hereby sckravdedged. the Parties attending tobe lege* baiaid
a. tentshalloadenedesaci*ren*rylstf^^
jayiaamier|e>aefceideer^
t^fictlMpmMtfefa^fae*ariai
AipwtrftolntBri^r^AnafyjisimdftaajwxlatailBMjaBd
easts, PBsNlaia^yaOat,*Oabltc>rdttalata*oMa^
bwcOon,|MritiaMtetrOurbtaftt!lar^
^^
c Caw^:*,if** be
MlysfeidBiana^
f. Payment PMeaataaj Coct Reducttor*ihatl be defined as the difference batmen CeemTs Historical Payment Praoesiing Coats and Oram** currant Payment
Processing Casta during theTerm of theAgreement Such eaatewMbaadsusaai from tain to taittto acou^
prooaulag organtlatlons (La. Van, MasterCard, AnwrtanEiraieis,etanfcestnjitwe.
Those refines obtained byClient hitheordinary course oftheir debit and credit card business*at are not directly attributable toPB ConsMMni Santas
srwRnrtbacaloilabKllrrtoPSConsuMniFa*
I. Term srtrt be difimedasU rewrite r ^
* MjjMffl PBIflaallal CM ItlHnHltBflfc After PES provides CMnt wIM PIS' confldiMlal report, ft Is within Olenfscola dUcrecrkw whether Client elects to
anplement the presented Payment Processing Cost Reduction recommendations (Inducing regulated and non-ragutatad debit card quaMcatlorts) In PSS's
C0^J*"i,,d,0" Pn**m- 0>tni " afaet out to Implement PSS's Payment Processing Cost Reduction ramrnmendatloni based on Various factors which
include but are notlimited to: Imphanentation hesibility, coatbusiness disruption and origination ofsuggested Payment ProcessingCott Reduction. In the
event, Client electa not tomove forward and Implement PES's Payment ftrassiiaj Cost lta<ajctlorcHh<r party m
tflb Agreement PBwfJ also cflwifeongobvmonths
W* Payment fVpcasslia] Cost Reduction reconmwdetlofll, CUM! Ml be oBRfattd to pay PR It, Qmi*tin Fee for Payment Prgcnting Cost Matfon*
Uandned and recommended hi pes'* cost induction Pragnnuub|ett toorigination of lugaested Payment Processkif Cost Reduction, /egardbss ofwho
5.QMHjHngfgaji Subject toortgmatlon ofsuggested Payment ProcasdngCost Reducflcn, aientshall pay PES aConcurring Fee for any Payment ProcasdngCost
Reductions In PrysCortFUKlucdwProt7amllurt are Implemented arrf actually M
Should Payment Processing
Coat Reductions occur asa result ofCSant obtaliMng a refundPB snail l entMad to aCarwIHiv ^
mamh m vmlch the reftind b infirnied and rece^ ev Ola^
Rate. In aetarmlntag theCost Reduction Ran, PES thaiutlliethe Historical Payment Processing Cost method thatmost accurately captures Cllanfs Payment
Processingcost Reductions.
toPoran Pawwtnt Cost Raowttons
Current Per Item
Current Number of
Cost Reduction
Ml
Transactions Applicable
Rite
CaruuJtfngfoe
$0.20
$0.10
] [
40,000
35*
$1,400.00
^^^a^mS^
' ^^l,towrfttlftoa^h7^m8M,^^w^^*ffaefflert^lwrvto
a^e?*S^l^
'
y wirWaWWU, baiPatTniifm Hty. H ayee*and**t*irt*4*Jia*P^
ST2C#n7i!iK
t^,,,,* wunn
oifbSiJt^^
**watoiem;iwrt*e^thgama,,^
l^MQtfrnaWaaTaaTMs Agreement maynotbe altered, amendedor modified eacept byawrWag signed try an authorisedrepresenariveofeach party.
16toalWWTPfeShouldarw provision oft^Agrtemert
'Hienfbrccabllltyc^iteclhcrprr^skHiss^llnotbeafnKttd
"snvTi-Yslftrtfr Failure byoHr^
t enforcesuchpaovtslon.
19.nrafil.cMMertir
. Thar*arttviB*Apermm*c^cor|a^
&Tltowc^>riy"nd>art*fsNwtec^
at0Blt1TtCaJ*<^^
aw one c* which may be Introduced In evidence) or used for any other purpose without fj production ofIt* duplicate counterpart Moreover,
rKab-rWu*Kfln^at a^ ofme m^
Sf^^Tf
"*>* <"* Ml*mminstrument te*dj| ialofthe sanies hereto, facsimile transmission and/or validated electronic
tfa*** .
-3frA**
Agrthorb^Sgrnture: _
d~
Wiws
OMiaiTA
mnuKLommoomAimnsKmAaa
rohnrt 1^ZZ?JL*ZZV *l2SSr *-&! ' " * "- * Operate Services, toe.
. a^p
WIEA5,tlto Parte*tave entered irrto tr^
e^'esWlow?6 *" *"' ""*W,U,h" <0n*',rtio,, *"*t " * " which ere herebyedrowledged, the rartfes
i^d^nte^ae^^""^ ""' '*"'**' *" """ M,pec0^ . Pkjrto dtaclosh., or receKto, aspec* Rem of
L~*J!a!!!V!!!2 ""^J"?'0" *" mMn aaaildansbH noe-pubnc Information whether In oral, written,"
graphic,
electronic or
^ Baren**r
othej-fcrmaiidwhecherrelBtexltoaWrlyeTltoperarti
a]
aw*tr frt&matfcM
*h*Mic,|ff*i^lo
te^Mftto, martattog nrmgtrt, cutestprea** aatesettimatea, beatne plans, and internal performance
fwulto reladngte pest preaent or f^^
and suppress;
*{atrwsii, computer software, aottrce coda, object code, flow charts, databases, ImnftTtoax. Information.
t^JFEU*!!!!? '"* ** "*"***** * ftbat l *^. atoja* aafti ** reason*** peg** f caret to
re-taeS2^
''""^"J** ** ""a** **** Ae?awMW byeither Party, the non-breaching Party she* bay* aft rarnadte J*and/or
<*W*veJlaWtolfcli^^
A
Wtom orde^ eiwreWr^ ii^rbjl^
t**dwtteraerfpT*toear*o^
*"
""
TteobeWMsofconAderr^
a)
b)
el
c|
dj
the Redolent can demonstrate through prior written records that itwas in Its possession prior tothe time of
disclosure end was not acquired directly or Indirectly from the Otsdostng Party or any parson, firm orcorporation
the neclplem can demonstrate: was independently developed by Recipient wRhout mm of Confldentlsf
Information,
lavnnapaaji srihln at
Page4 OfS
Lr.*wiL" HlMH^l[H'HSrt 'T*!!, T wquir,d " ' """* * J"**1 wri"'*rV proceeding to disclose any
Pto^prde?
"
Ls-ea-ll!!ll^^^
^ taxationte
ItlTJrZJr^^!!^^
toJs^lp^
*
JWsA^emwtutltoermreegrMraertbrf
reapewtotltosui^tmatterhereof. TNsAgntamentmay
i5Lu..-H!S-^T^,t sH-nS^*'!^* 1*e *>** *w- eMisfttotlcar* *f Rtsst Oaissfiljlrs As^MmetnC tesr tKtesf f m (2} yej.^
ofbadesecretsoTsctosedhareunder. IHts^aaaaaMiNBteMpjpn^
IX
Nafther thitAgraement northe dhdosure by either Party ofthe Confidential Information or other Information to the other
J2^T-^*^!10!ir,**,2L^.pu^,^ "ny woduc *v"e " the. oeber or to reaqulrei Itteajr Partt eo dlsckssei amy partaaihar
o*V>aihlngunraaetodlhgrts<anf^
U.
"""'"*
Pago 5 of5
*\
Copyright
UD^etl Siate* Copyright OSTsc*
Help
Search
History
Titles
Start Over
Public Catalog
Copyright Catalog (1978 to present)
Search Request: Left Anchored Name = foot locker
Search Results: Displaying 1 of 2 entries
^previous
next
The Striper.
Type of Work: Visual Material
Registration Number / Date: VA0001936780 / 2015-01-05
Application Title: The Striper.
Title: The Striper.
Description: Electronic file (eService)
Copyright Claimant: Foot Locker Corporate Services, Inc. Address: 112 West 34th Street, New
York, NY, 10120, United States.
Date of Creation: 1987
Date of Publication: 1988-01-31
Authorship on Application: Foot Locker Corporate Services, Inc., employer for hire; Domicile: United
States. Authorship: 2-D artwork.
Rights and Permissions: Amy Gaven, Kelley Drye & Warren, LLP, 101 Park Avenue, New York, NY,
10178, (212) 808-7800, agaven@kelleydrye.com
Names:
-^i previous
next
HIIIIIBlliiiillllll
-1
Contact Us I Request Copies I Get a Search Estimate I Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about
Copyright I Copyright Office Home Page I Library of Congress Home Page
sse
Wizant
|R
Contact Ui
Wvs.AISo
Marian Ej^HWtJse
:jawrrarawfo*soSlK9fiia*(;
*h lasgmixaaaanfessm 10asseejsv5!
Our Clients
COX
SB? Uisr.:ri>-.
i^^^ai
W*8kp
M arkets We Serve
4^
Ji
Mir
Covernment S; Misfikipa\
HiDMSQM
(BlfL
>
53 rTsfsiitoruliporU
K4if43lS2'fLA1f.i4MSfilii.
IriiffuiiWkSi
-. Li^3Llft
'*'JL,,' FfOfriii
>
N=wipjpjrssi'.fc!uhir(|i >
E.iSfASi&C&f.SLirtef
>
Q4 UBLfib-LOAiVVteliSjls:
>
H3jMUSii.M4ili3i
S^ HfdfsiSKrralAiistat'aru >
>
.
tr.LifU^sfiVrrit
K4iL3Lf3f.Ui!i?:<f
31 urn*
lfirpirtaUir.
Ak
Humana
uvls!sr<&
l:M'lS;Ux%!ftg
|j^t Otters
C<MTiL3Cl U4
>
Payments Biog
in
aVI7
'ddritactUs
Vizant is a financial consulting and advisory firm with a specialty focus in the area of financial payments We work with organizations to maximize the
efficiency of their payments environment and to attain the lowest possible cost to accept all types of financial payments. We are unlike any other
professional services firm, as we operate with a 100% results based performance pricing model,
What We Deliver
What We Do
Who We Are
wpsscaiPis- ^^
m
^fflfe QllCM
ijti
What We Think
Clients
jojuv-v ray
Hurnonci
Habitat
i*-.Jj^-.,...r..]i!.^
Mga
1 Store Solutions
iZone Group
Jared Lang
A & H Stores
JB Retail Stores
Jeffers
ABC Appliance
Acor Orthopaedic
Junonia
Agaci
Justin Brands
Agri Co Op
Alibris
K2 Corporation
Altex Electronics
Kentec
AmeriMark Direct
Amoeba Music
Kuhl Alfwear
Ashers Chocolates
La Porte Pharmacy
AuburnARTcom
Aztec Shops
LAT Sportswear
Bachmans
Laurie's Shoes
LeeBrant Jewelers
Leiham Corp
Leisure Arts
Vizanl Technologies
Barneys
Leo Ingwer
Baseball Express
LifeBytes
Beachbody
Bealts
Livescribe
LJ Thalmann Company
Belnick
Berend Brothers
Makit Products
Bike Line
Manzanita Bookstore
BikeBandit com
Blyth
MC Sales LLC
Bodybuilding com
McGregors Furniture
Boone Drugs
MFA
Bosselman
BoutiqueFive
Bronners
Mobley Furniture
Bulbscom
Modern Display
Burberry Limited US
Money Clamp
BuyOnlineNow.com
Montana Silversmiths
Calico Corner
Cam Audio
My Office Products
CAP Carpet
Nathan Company
National Vision
Newflower Market
Norman Group
Carpet Weavers
Chalet Nursery
Olympia Sports
Champ Sports
Online Sports
Chinaberry
Coastal Farm
OSC Sports
Oshoes
Otterbein University
Comp U Plus
Overstockcom
Cookieskids com
Oxyfresh Worldwide
Copshoes com
PAPYRUS
Cost Plus
Costume Supercenter of NJ
Country House
PennFishingStore.com
Countryside Cooperative
Perham Co Op Creamery
CPO Commerce
Customer One Co Op
CWDKidscom
Pink Crab
D&BSupply Company
Pinkies
Delias
Design Toscano
Dexclusive.com
Powells Books
PR Retail Stores
DL Zimco Inc
Prime Resources
Docs Drugs
Product Partners
Raylon Corp
Drugstore com
Duane Reade
Duxiana
Riddles Group
Eakes
Riddles Jewelry
Ebuys
Ridgeway Pharmacy
eCommerce outdoors
Right Source
Ellie
Rocking P Incorporated
Events
Rogers Jewelry
Everfast
Ron Herman
ExpressTools.com
Rosey Rentals
Fagen Pharmacy
Royal Copenhagen
Family Center
Rugs USA
Farm King
S&S Worldwide
Farmers Cooperative
Fey Industries
Schneidermans Furniture
Foot Locker
Sheplers Inc.
ShoppersChoice com
Fruit Company
Silpada Designs
Furniture Barn
SKECHERS USA
Gardens Alive
Skinnycorp LLC
SM Ruland Corporation
General Store
Smokin Joes
George Jensen
Sport Shack
Sports Center
Goods Store
Goodwill Akron OH
Stampin Up
Goodwill Bakersfield CA
Goodwill Buffalo NY
Star Furniture
Goodwill Columbus
Goodwill Flint
Strategic Distribution LP
Goodwill Fredericksburg VA
Strategic Partners
Goodwill Hagerstown MD
Goodwill Harrisburg PA
T4D UK Ltd
Tackle Direct
Talbots Inc
Tap Enterprises
TD Associates
TEquipment
Texas EZPAWN
Threadless
Time 4 Diamonds
Goodwill St Paul MN
Toolbarn com
Goodwill Youngstown OH
Tourneau
Govberg Jewelers
Gracious Home
Grange Co Op
Tweeter OPCO
Twister Group
Grass Pad
Greenway Cooperative
Uncommon Goods
Hancock Fabrics
Harmony Computers
Upper Deck
Heartland Country Co Op
Vantage Apparel
Herb Philipsons
Walsh Bros
Week
Hudsons Furniture
WineLoft
Inside Store
Wittwer
t0OrttaCtiJS .:'
INVOICE
^kVlzant
Client
Name
Invoice No.
Address
Date
City
Attention
FLCS-REF2
5/9/2014
Professional
Description
Cost Reduction
Rate
Services Fee
448,727.72
402,998.87
35%
1,151,425.34
35%
TOTAL DUE $
Payment Terms
851,726.59
Remit To
With the ever increasing cost of financial payment acceptance, many organizations are Implementing strategies to recoup and recover
their cost of acceptance.
Vizant has Implemented strategies to recoup acceptance costs for many of its existing clients including Fortune 100 companies, small
localand regional businesses, online retailers, universities, physician practices, medicaldevice companies, nan-profit institutions, and
travel and entertainment companies. Vizant would like to present your organization with customized solutions specific to your industry
and marketplace while maintaining compliance with regulations and alignment with organizational profit goals.
Pennsylvania S lO.'iSB.XOOi
Washington 509.755.0621
Date Ran=e
20MQit8tkaTtk>i> ttrora
Mgth-14
_Jttwwiry.M_
2013Quali8attiimErrofi
Novetr*f:u
"peoeaib-ii'
Octehw-13
SeptarfaW-13
Mf33
IZ-01-01 . H3-0frm
Total Data FtYTO
X&VWM
12AS3M1
ssjmss
132.iWS.aS;
&*?
stjtam
ssjmi ,
S7.Ua.t3
1.7QIM1M
votrnxo $
muxam s
JJMiJtmjO
1JU8JB$9B .
WzantTediix*)*^ Confidential-5/9/2014
Debit Qualitication
K&L GATES
SPOKANE, WA 99201-5102
T +1 509 624 2100 F +1 509 456 0146 klgates.com
Edward T. Kang
Philadelphia, PA 19109
mike.keyes@klgates.com
ekang@LawKHF.com
July 31,2014
We are litigation counsel to Foot Locker Corporate Services, Inc. ("Foot Locker"). We
are in receipt of your letter dated July 22, 2014, sent on behalf of Vizant Technologies, LLC
("Vizant"). Your client's demand for $944,456.40 has no basis in reality and showcases a
fundamental misunderstanding of the Consulting Agreement entered into by the parties on
May 31, 2013 ("Agreement"). Foot Locker has attempted in good faith to resolve its differences
with Vizant only to be subjected to concocted claims for consulting fees, unprofessional behavior
by the Vizant Management Team, and willful breaches of the Agreement. Your letter of July 22
is simply the last straw. Accordingly, pursuant to Section 8 of the Agreement, Foot Locker
hereby terminates the Agreement, effective immediately. Further, pursuant to Section 7 of the
Mutual Confidentiality Agreement dated May 31, 2013 ("Confidentiality Agreement") and
attached as Exhibit A to the Agreement, please promptly return all documents reflecting
Confidential Information, and all electronic or hard copies of such Confidential Information.
Finally, Vizant has intentionally and wilfully breached the Agreement and is engaging in
unfair competition and trademark infringement in violation of Sections 32 and 43(a) of the
Federal Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1114, 1125(a). We hereby demand that Vizant immediately
remove from vizant.com and any other marketing collateral all references to Foot Locker, Foot
Locker Corporate Services, Inc. or the Foot Locker stylized logo, all of which Vizant was
expressly prohibited from using under Section 9 of the Agreement in the first instance. If we do
not receive written confirmation by August 4, 2014 at 5:00 p.m. (EDT), that you have removed
Foot Locker, Foot Locker Corporate Services, Inc. and the Foot Locker logo from vizant.com
and all associated marketing material, we will be left with no choice other than to pursue all legal
and equitable relief to which Foot Locker is entitled.
As for the claims set forth in your letter, we address each in turn.
klgates.com
K&L GATES
vKang u
Hld^T^Tr
Haggerty
& Fetbroyt LLC
Page 2
July 31, 2014
reductions" (upon which this fee is allegedly based) are not "directly attributable to PES's
Consulting Services" as required under the Agreement. See Section 1(h). As Vizant well knows,
in July 2013, Elavon migrated its PIN debit processing from Elan to Interlink. As a result ofthat
migration, the new processing system was calibrated so that Foot Locker was charged at the
lower rate beginning in July 2013 and on a going forward basis thereafter. Vizant notified Foot
Locker that there had been a $420,601.80 overcharge to Foot Locker, and was paid its 35%
consulting fee on April 15, 2014, after the refund was paid to Foot Locker by Elavon. Because
Elavon had already corrected its internal error prior to Vizant's review, though, Foot Locker is
not obligated to pay any further consulting fees related to this issue. For your consideration, we
attach as Exhibit A an email dated May 6, 2014, from Mr. Larry Hock, VP of Global Account
Management at Elavon. As Mr. Hock states, the issue with the PAVD overcharges was
"automatically corrected" when Elavon migrated from Elan to Interlink. We trust that this
explanation and email from Mr. Hock clarifies any misunderstanding on your client's part. We
consider this issue fully and finally resolved.
The "Unpaid Refunds" Claim for $851.726.59
Your client's May 9, 2014 Invoice No. FLCS-REF2 for consulting fees in the amount of
$851,726.59 is specious. In fact, after your client sent this invoice, Mr. Bizzaro admitted in a
follow-up telephone conversation that it was sent to Foot Locker "just to get its attention."
Further, Ms. Angie Grunte stated in her email of June 5, 2014 that "Vizant will issue a credit
memo for Invoice #FLCS-REF2 in the amount of $851,726.59" and that "Vizant will invoice
Foot Locker once it is identified that Foot Locker has benefited from any rebates or refunds
stemming from the debit card qualifications discrepancies" (emphasis ours). We attach as
Exhibit B Ms. Grunte's email, which you must not have reviewed in light of the allegations in
your letter of July 22. By your client's express admissions, Invoice No. FLCS-REF2 is
meaningless and carries no legal significance whatsoever.
Regardless of your client's admissions, the Invoice is also invalid in light of the express
terms of the Agreement. Section l(i) of the Agreement provides that "invoicing shall commence
when PES determines that some portion of its cost reduction recommendations have been
implemented on behalf of the Client and resulted in actual cost reduction." Section l(i)
(emphasis supplied). The Agreement further provides that "Client shall pay PES a Consulting
Fee for any Payment Processing Cost Reductions in PES's Cost Reduction Program that are
implemented and actually realized by Client during the Term of this Agreement" Agreement,
Section 5 (emphasis supplied). These provisions make it unambiguously clear that Vizant is not
owed any Consulting Fee until Foot Locker actually receives an economic benefit in the form of
either a refund or credit. The results of Vizant's "Durbin Analysis" has not been implemented,
and Foot Locker certainly has not realized any cost reductions or received any refunds from Visa,
MasterCard, or Elavon.
K&L GATES
F
H *J^
Kang Haggerty & Fetbroyt LLC
Page 3
July 31, 2014
Instead, here is what occurred to date with respect to this issue: On October 31, 2013,
Vizant presented Foot Locker with the so-called "Durbin Analysis" indicating that there were
possible overcharges totaling $1.6 million regarding regulated vs. non-regulated BIN ranges for
debit card processing (approximately $420,000 of those possible overcharges related to the
PAVD issue discussed above). Due to the size of the data set, Vizant, Elavon, and Foot Locker
all agreed that the data for one month-June 2013--would be examined by Elavon. After Elavon's
review, it validated the BIN Tables received from Visa and MasterCard and determined that there
were no overcharges to Foot Locker. There is no obligation for Foot Locker to do any further
investigation or due diligence with respect to this issue. We also consider this issue fully and
finally resolved.
The Alleged "Failure" To provide Payment Processing Cost Information
Contrary to the allegations in your letter, Foot Locker provided all of the information
required of it under the Agreement. Due to American Express and Discover making up a tiny
fraction of Foot Locker's total credit and debit card purchases (approximately 6% total), the
parties agreed that this data set would be sent to Vizant after Vizant completed its review of the
Visa, Mastercard and debitcard charges. Given that Foot Locker has nowterminated the contract
with Vizant, no such data will be provided.
As for your client's demand that it be given information regarding the Visa incentive
program, Foot Locker was not in a position to disclose information related to that program. As
Foot Locker previously explained, the documents provided to Foot Locker by Visa were
designated "confidential" and were provided to Foot Locker on the condition that the information
would not be shared with third parties. After inquiring whether Visa would allow Foot Locker to
share these incentive materials with Vizant, Foot Locker was informed that Visa would not waive
the confidentiality designations with respect to those documents. Vizant's continued demands
(including another improper one in your July 22 letter) are simply attempts to have Foot Locker
breach its agreement with Visa. As previously informed, Foot Locker was not~and is notwilling to breach that confidence.
Vizant's Breach of the Agreement and Confidentiality Agreement
Agreement. The Agreement prohibits Vizant from using "Client's logos, trademark, oridentity in
any manner including without limitation, in PES's Sales Presentation and Client's name in PES's
regular listing of clients." Agreement, Section 9. This provision was specifically negotiated by
Foot Locker and was an important, material part of the Agreement. Further, the Agreement
K&L GATES
v H
'fvtT^Tr
Exhibit C are printouts from vizant.com where Foot Locker is referenced in violation of the
Agreements. Foot Locker is entitled to injunctive relief for these breaches. See Consulting
Agreement, Section 4.
The unauthorized use of the name Foot Locker Corporate Services, Inc., the Foot
Locker word trademark, and the Foot Locker stylized logo also constitutes unfair competition
and trademark infringement under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1051 et seq. We hereby demand
that your client immediately cease and desist from any further use of the name Foot Locker
Corporate Services, Inc., the federally-registered trademark Foot Locker as depicted in U.S.
Trademark Registration No.3,810,824, and the stylized version of the Foot Locker logo as
depicted in U.S. Trademark Registration Nos. 85,832,195, 85,800,132, and 85,452,377. All
references to Foot Locker Corporate Services, Inc., Foot Locker, the stylized Foot Locker logo,
and any other trademarks or logos of Foot Locker must be immediately removed from any
website and marketing collateral by no later than August 4. 2014, with written confirmation of
your client's compliance received by Foot Locker by that date as well.
Conclusion
In sum, Foot Locker has no intention of paying your client fees for services never
provided and for refunds and credits never realized by Foot Locker. Foot Locker has no interest
in continuing to do business with Vizant, which has proven to be unprofessional, and
intentionally engaging in wilful breaches of the parties' Agreements. The Consulting Agreement
and Mutual Confidentiality Agreements are hereby terminated, effective immediately. We look
forward to receiving confirmation that Vizant has removed all references to Foot Locker and the
Foot Locker stylized logo from vizant.com and any other medium.
In sending this letter, Foot Locker expressly reserves all rights and does not waive any
claims or defenses it may otherwise assert against Vizant.
Very tru
JMK/nkt
Enclosures
cc: Client
EXHIBIT A
To:
<tfenner@footlocker.com>
Date: 05/06/2014 05:10 PM
Subject:PADD clarification
Tate,
Per our conversation just wanted to clarify. Elavon did not make programming changes to correct the
issue we discovered during the Vizant review. The issue was automatically corrected when we migrated
Interlink pin debit processing from Elan to Interlink direct. Elavon did not realize there was an issue at
the time, but once the error was uncovered we confirmed it was corrected with the migration. The
correction took place during July of 2013 before the Vizant review ever began.
I hope this helps clarify the issue and the correction.
Please let me know if you would like to discuss.
Regards,
Larry Hock
VP - Global Account Management
Elavon
(513) 254-7363
The information contained in this e-mail and in any attachments is intended only for the person or entity
to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review,
retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information
by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. This message has been scanned
for known computer viruses.
The information in this e-mail, and any attachment therein, is confidential and for use by the addressee
only. If you are not the intended recipient, please return the e-mail to the sender and delete it from
your computer.
Although the Company attempts to sweep e-mail and attachments for viruses, it does not guarantee
that either are virus-free and accepts no liability
for any damage sustained as a result of viruses.
EXHIBIT B
Cc:
Date:
06/05/2014 06:50 PM
Thank you again for your time this morning. Joe, Kim and Iappreciated you sharing your concerns and
felt the conversation was productive. We are committed to our partnership with Foot Locker and look
forward to continuing with our efforts on your behalf. In orderto proceed, we have prepared an
amendment to the existing agreement which will serve to clearly establish the expectations for both
Vizant and Foot Locker as we continue addressing the cost reduction and cost recovery opportunities
identified for your organization.
Specifically, this amendment incorporates the following topics from this morning's discussion:
I
Vizant will issue a credit memofor Invoice #FLCS-REF2 in
I
|
I
f
|
|
{
{
f
|
successors)
Using this as ourfoundation, we are confident that together Vizant and Foot Locker will move quickly to
capture the available opportunities and generate substantial value for both organizations. Please review
j
S
the enclosed amendment and do not hesitate to contact me with questions. Joe, Kim and Ilook forward
to discussing the amendment and nextsteps in this process with your Tuesday, June 10th at 3 pm EST.
Best regards,
Angie Grunte
Senior Vice President
The information contained in this email is proprietary in nature. It is the product of intellectual property
owned by Vizant Technologies LLC.
Pursuant to our Professional Services Agreement, if the strategies and solutions set forth herein result
in cost reductions, cost eliminations or cost recapturing realized by Client, no matter whether Vizant or
Client effected said reduction, elimination or recapturing, then Vizantwill invoice in accordance with
said Agreement.(See attached file:
FootLocker_Amendment_060514.doc)
The information in this e-mail, and any attachment therein, is confidential and for use by the addressee
only. Ifyou are not the intended recipient, please return the e-mail to the sender and delete it from
your computer.
Although the Companyattempts to sweep e-mail and attachments for viruses, it does not guarantee
that either are virus-free and accepts no liability
for any damage sustained as a result of viruses.
EXHIBIT C
Avizani
" ".*
;<
"-t "c
'<rr^
'X'G'iWZ.M
i ipi i ,!
';
WfcDe
,1
vvtt Wc"
Cafnfjffritoisirre Review
Payments of AS T^jic
Our Clients
"CV Mr H
KiDISOH SDIS
Foot toclwr
^LabCorp
J^
|i|r
Humana
Markets We Serve
\'<lz X-tZC C.V*iC"* .
A7KCi.Tl..'li
3 rTofsssbfvi ISports
^fe l'L=rraL<-3
A.U-MiLsvsi*
>
>
Uji' llS.'J'iri
t'ilifD r-.i*=rt
tJt" M=iU.fj'.liil:cKiiLS.rj'LsilCC':
ij
i t Mir-.faiUfsrii
>
l<aL3::ilirsi4.0r;:'i
inrijc-fUUf,
jg
S
'* t . ^ *
-|
cute
dim
>
I4fev!ibftfi<
lSsmftii;f>fc3lbn5.
Locations
I=ihr.:-::-;v i ti. p^ -1
Site Map
Iravels Lading
>
Olhcf'r
>
Cw^UcLUi
Payments Blog
in
^kVl7
Contact Us
Vizant is a financial consulting and advisory firm with a specialty focus in the area of financial payments. We work with organizations to maximize the
efficiency of their payments environment and to attain the lowest possible cost to accept all types of financial payments. We are unlike any other
professional services firm, as we operate with a 100% results based performance pricing model.
Who We Are
What We Do
What We Deliver
What We Think
Clients
A-aiw ray
Humana
tNTffl<iFS
J^SBto^WOWvMJ^AW&feJ,!
iZone Group
Jared Lang
5 th Ave Textbook
ASH Stores
JB Retail Stores
Jeffers
ABC Appliance
Acor Orthopaedic
Junonia
Agaci
Justin Brands
Agri Co Op
Alibris
K2 Corporation
Altex Electronics
Kentec
AmeriMark Direct
Amoeba Music
Kuhl Alfwear
Ashers Chocolates
La Porte Pharmacy
AuburnARTcom
Aztec Shops
LAT Sportswear
Bachmans
Laurie's Shoes
LeeBrant Jewelers
Leiham Corp
Leisure Arts
- a
Vizanl Technologies
Barneys
Leo Ingwer
Baseball Express
LifeBytes
Beachbody
Bealls
Livescribe
LJ Thalmann Company
Belnick
Berend Brothers
Makit Products
Bike Line
Manzanita Bookstore
BikeBandit.com
Blyth
MC Sales LLC
Bodybuilding com
McGregors Furniture
Boone Drugs
MFA
Bosselman
BoutiqueFive
Bronners
Mobley Furniture
Bulbscom
Modern Display
Burberry Limited US
Money Clamp
BuyOnlineNow.com
Montana Silversmiths
Calico Corner
Cam Audio
My Office Products
CAP Carpet
Nathan Company
National Vision
Newflower Market
Norman Group
Carpet Weavers
Chalet Nursery
Olympia Sports
Champ Sports
Online Sports
China berry
Coastal Farm
OSC Sports
Oshoes
Otterbein University
Comp U Plus
Overstock com
Cookieskids com
Oxyfresh Worldwide
Copshoescom
PAPYRUS
Cost Plus
Costume Supercenter of NJ
Country House
PennFishingStore.com
Countryside Cooperative
Perham Co Op Creamery
CPO Commerce
Customer One Co Op
CWDKidscom
Pink Crab
Pinkies
Delias
Design Toscano
Dexclusive. com
Powells Books
PR Retail Stores
DL Zimco Inc
Prime Resources
Docs Drugs
Product Partners
Raylon Corp
Drugstore com
Duane Reade
Duxiana
Riddles Group
Eakes
Riddles Jewelry
Ebuys
Ridgeway Pharmacy
eCommerce outdoors
Right Source
Ellie
Rocking P Incorporated
Events
Rogers Jewelry
Everfast
Ron Herman
ExpressTools com
Rosey Rentals
Fagen Pharmacy
Royal Copenhagen
Family Center
Rugs USA
Farm King
S&S Worldwide
Farmers Cooperative
Fey Industries
Schneidermans Furniture
Foot Locker
Sheplers Inc.
ShoppersChoice com
Fruit Company
Silpada Designs
Furniture Barn
SKECHERS USA
Gardens Alive
Skinnycorp LLC
SM Ruland Corporation
General Store
Smokin Joes
George Jensen
Sport Shack
Sports Center
Goods Store
Goodwill Akron OH
Stampin Up
Goodwill Bakersfield CA
Goodwill Buffalo NY
Star Furniture
Goodwill Columbus
Goodwill Flint
Strategic Distribution LP
Goodwill Fredericksburg VA
Strategic Partners
Goodwill Hagerstown MD
Goodwill Harrisburg PA
T4D UK Ltd
Tackle Direct
Talbots Inc
Tap Enterprises
TD Associates
TEquipment
Texas EZPAWN
Threadless
Time 4 Diamonds
Goodwill St Paul MN
Toolbarncom
Goodwill Youngstown OH
Tourneau
Govberg Jewelers
Gracious Home
Grange Co Op
Tweeter OPCO
Twister Group
Grass Pad
Greenway Cooperative
Uncommon Goods
Hancock Fabrics
Harmony Computers
Upper Deck
Heartland Country Co Op
Vantage Apparel
Herb Philipsons
Walsh Bros
Week
Hudsons Furniture
WineLoft
Inside Store
Wittwer
?06iitacrus:
Locations
Brandywine
5 Chnstv Dn
Spokane WA
P: 610.358.1003
P: 509.755.0621
F: 866.526.5001
F: 866.464.4869
Lonaon.
Umtea Kingdom
SE1 ?RI~
P: 0203.283.4412
P: 416.644.1566
F: 866.438.7813
INVOICE
^Vizant
Foot Locker
Name
Invoice No.
Address
Date
City
Attention
Tate Fenner
FLCS: 9 -12
8/31/2014
Professional
Cost Reduction
S
S
S
127,841.98
511,744.59
453,788.40
346,236.00
Description
Rate
35%
3596
3594
3596
Sendees Fee
$
$
$
$
TOTAL DUE $
Payment Terms
44,744.69
179,110.61
158,825.94
121,182.60
503,863.85
Paymentdue on receiptofinvoice.
Unpaid balances will accrue interest per agreement terms.
Remit To
With theever increasing costoffinancial payment acceptance, many organizations areimplementing strategies to recoup and
recover their cost of acceptance.
Vizant has implemented strategies to recoup acceptance costs formany ofits existing clients including Fortune 100 companies,
small local and regional businesses, online retailers, universities, physician practices, medical device companies, non-profit
institutions, andtraveland entertainment companies. Vizant would like to presentyour organization with customized solutions
specific to your industry and marketplace while maintaining compliance with regulations andalignment with organizational
profit goals.
Washington 509.755.0621
Ontario 416,644.1566