Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
www.elsevier.com/locate/oceaneng
Abstract
The radiation and diffraction boundary value problem arising from the interaction of linear water
waves with two vertical truncated cylinders is investigated by use of the method of separation of
variables and the method of matched eigenfunction expansion. Analytical expressions for the
radiated and diffracted potentials are obtained as infinite series of orthogonal functions. The
unknown coefficients in the obtained expressions are determined by use of the matched
eigenfunction expansion method. To verify the obtained expressions, the Greens second identity
and the symmetry of the matrices for the added masses and damping coefficients are used. The results
show that the analytical expressions presented in this paper are correct. By use of the present
analytical solution, the hydrodynamic coefficients and wave forces for some specific cases are
calculated and the hydrodynamic effects of the cylinders radii on the hydrodynamic properties of the
cylinders are investigated which will supply some useful information for the design of this kind of
system.
q 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Hydrodynamic property; Radiation; Diffraction; Water waves; Analytical method; Two vertical
truncated cylinders
242
1. Introduction
It is well known that floating structures, such as ocean platforms, breakwaters, and
wave energy devices, are often used in ocean engineering. The hydrodynamic properties,
of which most important are the hydrodynamic coefficients, wave excitation forces, and
transmission and reflection coefficients, are of major interest of designers and many
researches have been carried out and lots of results have been obtained.
To analyze the hydrodynamic properties of floating structures, various methods, such as
the Boundary Element Method (BEM), the Finite Element Method (FEM), and some
analytical methods, can be used. Of all existing methods the most efficient are analytical
methods which are only applicable to some particular problems, for example, the problem
considered in the present paper. Numerical methods like BEM and FEM are suitable for
general problems, but the computational procedure is complex, the efficiency and the
accuracy are relatively lower compared with those of analytical methods. So the best
methods for some particular problems are analytical ones.
Up to now, many scholars have applied various analytical methods, such as the
matched eigenfunction expansion, the multipole expansion, and the multiple scattering
technique, to the study of hydrodynamic properties of floating structures. The often-used
analytical methods are the matched eigenfunction expansion method. The following are
some examples of application of these analytical methods to hydrodynamics of vertical
floating circular structures. By using the eigenfunction method, Black et al. (1971), Yeung
(1981), Sabuncu and Calisal (1981), Calisal and Sabuncu (1984, 1993), Williams et al.
(2000) and Bhatta and Rahman (2003) studied the radiation and/or diffraction by a single
floating circular cylinder and obtained theoretical results of hydrodynamic coefficients
and/or wave forces. Berggren and Johansson (1992) and Eidsmoen (1995) investigated the
heave radiation problem of a two-body axisymmetric system and calculated the heave
added masses and damping coefficients. Wu et al. (2004) explored the diffraction and
radiation problem for a cylinder over a caisson in water of finite depth and presented the
calculated results of hydrodynamic coefficients, wave forces and hydrodynamic effect of
the caisson on the hydrodynamics of the cylinder. Yeung and Sphaier (1989) determined
the radiation and diffraction properties of a floating vertical cylinder of finite draft in a
channel. Mciver and Bennett (1993) and Linton and Evans (1993) studied hydrodynamic
characteristics of a body in a channel by use of the multipole expansion. Simon (1982),
Kagemoto and Yue (1986), Williams and Demirbilek (1988), Williams and Abul-Azm
(1989) and Williams and Rangappa (1994) investigated the scattering and/or radiation
problems of horizontally arranged cylinder arrays by application of the multiple scattering
technique and plane-wave approximation or modified plane-wave technique.
In this paper, we consider the radiation and diffraction problem of a system consisting
of two coaxial cylinders arranged vertically. The problem has practical engineering
background, and part of which, namely cylinders in heave, was studied by Berggren and
Johansson (1992) and Eidsmoen (1995). They did not consider the sway and roll motions
and the scattering of water waves though Eidsmoen (1995) obtained the vertical force on
the cylinders by use of the general Haskinds theorem. The information about the sway and
roll motions of the cylinders and wave scattering may be important for designers, so we
study the radiation and diffraction problem here. The method used here is the matched
243
eigenfunction expansion which has been used by many investigators listed above.
Analytical expressions for the radiated and diffracted potentials are obtained. The
hydrodynamic coefficients and wave forces are calculated and the hydrodynamic effects of
the cylinders radii on the hydrodynamic properties are investigated.
244
For linear water waves considered here, it is customary not to solve F directly, but make
the following decomposition if we consider only heave, sway and roll modes of radiation
F Z FI C FD C
2 X
3
X
FJ;L
R
(2)
JZ1 LZ1
FI Z K
AJ;2
R
(5)
where
(
dj;L Z
LZj
L sj
Substitution of Eq. (5) into Eq. (1) gives the following general partial differential
equation (LZ1,2,3)
"
#
1 K d1;L 2 4J;L
v2 4J;L
1 v
v4J;L
R
R
R
r
C
Z0
K
2
r vr
vr
vz
r2
245
(6)
To obtain the unique solution to Eq. (6), it is necessary to specify the following boundary
conditions:
1. The free surface boundary condition
v4J;L
u2
R
K 4J;L
Z0
vz
g R
z Z 0; rO R
(7)
z Z Kh1
(8)
(9)
v4J;L
R
Z dJ;2 d1;L K rd3;L z Z Ke1 ; r% R
vz
(10)
v4J;L
R
Z dJ;2 d1;L K rd3;L z Z Ke2 ; r% R
vz
(11)
v4J;L
R
Z dJ;1 d2;L C z K z0 d3;L Kd1 % z% 0; r Z R
vr
(12)
v4J;L
R
Z dJ;2 d2;L C z K z0 d3;L Ke2 % z%Ke1 ; r Z R
vr
(13)
(14)
246
It should be noted that (0,0,z0) is assumed to be the center of rotation in order to specify the
body surface boundary condition of roll motion.
2.2. Mathematical model for the diffracted potential
The governing equation and the corresponding boundary conditions for the diffracted
potential are expressed as follows
v2 FD 1 v
vFD
1 v2 F D
r
C
Z0
C
r vr
vr
r 2 vq2
vz2
(15)
vFD u2
K FD Z 0 z Z 0; rO R
vz
g
(16)
vFD
Z0
vz
(17)
z Z Kh1
vFD
vF
ZK I
vn
vn
on S1 and S2
p vFD
K ikFD Z 0
lim r
r/N
vr
(18)
r/N
(19)
where n is the outward normal from the fluid; S1 and S2 are the submerged surfaces of
cylinders 1 and 2, respectively.
3. Solution method
To obtain the expressions for the radiated and diffracted potentials, we divide the fluid
domain into three subdomains I, II and III as shown in Fig. 1. Here the radiated potentials
J;L
J;L
in the three subdomains are denoted by 4J;L
R1 , 4R2 and 4R3 , and the diffracted potentials
are expressed by FD1, FD2 and FD3, respectively. The method of separation of variables is
applied in each subdomain to obtain the expressions for the radiated and diffracted
potentials with unknown coefficients. The unknown coefficients are then solved by use of
the matched eigenfunction expansion method.
3.1. Expressions for the radiated potentials in three subdomains
Application of the method of separation of variables may give the analytical
expressions for the radiated potentials in regions I, II and III as follows.
247
3.1.1. Region I
4J;L
R1 Z
N
X
AJ;L
cosln z C h1
n
nZ1
R1Kd1;L ln r
R1Kd1;L ln R
(20)
nZ1
n Z 2; 3; .
(21)
(22)
(23)
1
and K1Kd1;L are the first kind Hankel function and the second kind modified
where H1Kd
1;L
Bessel function of order 1Kd1,L, respectively.
3.1.2. Region II
J;L
J;L 1Kd1;L
4J;L
r
C
R2 Z 4R2P C B1
N
X
nZ2
BJ;L
cosbn z C e1
n
I1Kd1;L bn r
I1Kd1;L bn R
(24)
where I1Kd1;L is the first kind modified Bessel function of order 1Kd1,L; 4J;L
R2P and bn are the
particular solution and eigenvalue of the radiation mode L of cylinder J in region II, whose
expressions are given by
8
z C e1 2 K r 2 =2
z C d1 2 K r 2 =2
>
>
d
K
dJ;2
LZ1
>
J;1
>
>
2h2
2h2
<
0
LZ2
(25)
4J;L
R2P Z
>
>
2
3
2
3
>
z C e1 r K r =4
z C d1 r K r =4
>
>
:K
dJ;1 C
dJ;2 L Z 3
2h2
2h2
bn Z n K 1p=h2
(26)
N
X
nZ2
CnJ;L cosgn z C h1
I1Kd1;L gn r
I1Kd1;L gn R
(27)
where 4J;L
R3P and gn are the particular solution and eigenvalue of the radiation mode L of
cylinder J in region III and the expressions for them are
248
8
z C h1 2 K r 2 =2
>
>
dJ;2
>
>
>
2h3
<
0
4J;L
R3P Z
>
>
>
z C h1 2 r K r 3 =4
>
>
:K
dJ;2
2h3
L Z1
L Z2
(28)
L Z3
gn Z n K 1p=h3
(29)
, BJ;L
and CnJ;L in Eqs. (20), (24) and (27) are unknown and will be
The coefficients AJ;L
n
n
determined in Section 3.3.
3.2. Expressions for the diffracted potentials in three subdomains
Similarly, applying the method of separation of variables to the diffraction problem
satisfying Eqs. (15)(19), one can easily derive the expressions for the diffracted potentials
in regions I, II and III as follows, respectively.
FD1 Z
N X
N
X
Am;n cosln z C h1
mZ0 nZ1
FD2 Z KFI C
N
X
mZ0
FD3 Z KFI C
N
X
mZ0
Rm ln r
cosmq
Rm ln R
(30)
)
Im bn r
Bm;1 r C
Bm;n cosbn z C e1
cosmq
Im bn R
nZ2
(31)
)
Im gn r
cosgn z C h1
cosmq
Im gn R
(32)
N
X
N
X
(
Cm;1 r C
Cm;n
nZ2
where Am,n, Bm,n and Cm,n are the coefficients to be solved in Section 3.3; ln, bn and gn are
defined by Eqs. (21), (22), (26) and (29).
3.3. Method for the unknown coefficients
The expressions for the radiated and diffracted potentials given in Sections 3.1 and 3.2
satisfy all the boundary conditions except those at the boundary rZR. The remaining
problem is to solve the unknown coefficients AJ;L
, BJ;L
and CnJ;L in the expressions for
n
n
the radiated potentials and Am,n, Bm,n and Cm,n (mZ0,1,2,.; nZ1,2,.) in the expressions
for the diffracted potentials. These unknown coefficients are determined by use of the
conditions of continuity of pressure and normal velocity at rZR. For the radiation problem
considered here, the conditions of continuity are the following
J;L
4J;L
R2 Z 4R1
K e1 % z%Kd1
(33)
J;L
4J;L
R3 Z 4R1
K h1 % z%Ke2
(34)
v4J;L
R1
vr
8
dJ;1 d2;L C z K z0 d3;L
>
>
>
>
>
J;L
>
>
> v4R2
<
vr
Z
dJ;2 d2;L C z K z0 d3;L
>
>
>
>
>
J;L
>
>
>
: v4R3
vr
249
Kd1 % z% 0
Ke1 % z%Kd1
Ke2 % z%Ke1
(35)
Kh1 % z%Ke2
r Z R; K e1 % z%Kd1
(36)
FD3 Z FD1
r Z R; K h1 % z%Ke2
(37)
8
vF
>
>
K I
>
>
vr
>
>
>
> vFD2
>
vFD1 < vr
Z
vF
>
vr
>
>
K I
>
>
vr
>
>
>
>
: vFD3
vr
r Z R; K d1 % z% 0
r Z R; K e1 % z%Kd1
(38)
r Z R; K e2 % z%Ke1
r Z R; K h1 % z%Ke2
If the method of matched eigenfunction expansion is applied at the boundary rZR, one
can easily obtain the following expressions
Kd1
Kd1
4J;L
R;
zcosb
z
C
e
dz
Z
4J;L
(39)
i
1
R1
R2 R; zcosbi z C e1 dz
Ke1
Ke2
Ke1
4J;L
R1 R; zcosgi z C h1
Kh1
0
Kh1
Ke2
dz Z
4J;L
R3 R; zcosgi z C h1 dz
(40)
Kh1
v4J;L
R1 r; z
jrZR cosli z C h1 dz
vr
Kd1
Ke2 J;L
v4J;L
v4R3 r; z
R2 r; z
jrZR cosli z C h1 dz C
jrZR cosli z
vr
vr
Ke1
Kh1
0
dJ;1 d2;L C z K z0 d3;L cosli z C h1 dz
C h1 dz C
Kd1
Ke1
(41)
(42)
C
Ke2
2p Kd1
0
Ke1
250
2p Kd1
0
(43)
Ke1
2p 0
vFD1
jrZR cosli z C h1 cosjqdq dz
0
Kh1 vr
Kd1
Ke1
Ke2
2p 0
vFI
vFD2
vFI
vFD3
C
C
C
Z
cosli z C h1 dz
0
Kd1 vr
Ke1 vr
Ke2 vr
Kh1 vr
44
!cosjqdq
Z
P
C
(45)
j i
j
1i
BJ;L
h
=2
iO
1
jZ1
2
i
N
X
(
AJ;L
Elj ; gi
j
Z PJ;L
2i
jZ1
CiJ;L h3 R1Kd1;L
iZ1
CiJ;L h3 =2
iO 1
J;L
DL
AJ;L
i
li Nli Z P3i
"
BJ;L
1 K d1;L RKd1;L
1
N
X
(46)
#
BJ;L
Db 1 K d1;L ; j
j
Eli ; bj
jZ2
"
C
N
X
#
CjJ;L Dg 1 K d1;L ; j
Eli ; gj
jZ2
(47)
N
X
(
Am;j Elj ; bi Z P4 m; i C
jZ1
N
X
(
Am;j Elj ; gi Z P5 m; i C
jZ1
Bm;i h2 Rm
i Z1
Bm;i h2 =2
iO 1
Cm;i h3 Rm
iZ1
Cm;i h3 =2
iO 1
Am;i Dl m; iNl i Z P6 m; i C mR
N
X
mK1
sinli h2
sinli h3
Bm;1
C Cm;1
li
li
(48)
(49)
jZ2
(50)
Elj ; bi Z
Kd1
251
(51a)
(51b)
Ke1
Elj ; gi Z
Ke2
Kh1
Nl i Z
cos2 li z C h1 dz
(52)
Kh1
8 10
kHm kR
>
>
< 1
Hm kR
Dl m; i Z
0
>
l
>
: i Km li R
Km li R
iZ1
(53a)
iO 1
Db m; j Z
bj Im0 bj R
Im bj R
(53b)
Dg m; j Z
gj Im0 gj R
Im gj R
(53c)
PJ;L
Z
1i
Kd1
4J;L
R2P jrZR cosbi z C e1 dz
(54a)
4J;L
R3P jrZR cosbi z C e1 dz
(54b)
Ke1
PJ;L
Z
2i
Kd1
Ke1
PJ;L
3i
0
Z
dJ;1 d2;L
Kd1
Ke1
Ke2
P4 m; i Z
(55a)
P5 m; i Z
(55b)
252
igkAmm Jm0 kR
P6 m; i Z
u coshkh1
(55c)
Kh1
, BJ;L
, CnJ;L , Am,n, Bm,n and
To obtain the numerical solutions to the coefficients AJ;L
n
n
Cm,n, it is necessary to choose the finite terms of the infinite series to carry out the
computation. If the first N and M!N terms of the infinite series are chosen for the radiated
and diffracted problems, respectively, one can obtain three sets and M sets of system of
equations, each set of system of equations consist of 3N equations with complex
coefficients and equal number of unknowns. Making some arrangements for these
equations yields
J;L
SJ;L
R X R Z FR
m
Sm
D X D Z FD
L Z 1; 2; 3; J Z 1; 2
m Z 0; 1; .; M
(56a)
(56b)
where
J;L
J;L
; AJ;L
; .; AJ;L
; BJ;L
; .; BJ;L
; C2J;L ; .; CNJ;L T ;
XR Z AJ;L
N ; B1
N ; C1
1
2
2
(57)
253
J;L
where FW
is the time-independent wave force which is computed by
J;L
FW Z iruFI C FD nL ds
(58)
SJ
6
J;L
FW
Z r iu4 FI
v4J;L
R
vn
SJ
ds K 4J;L
R
vFI
vFI 7
ds K 4J;L
ds5
R
vn
vn
S1
(59)
S2
1;L
and the expressions for FW
obtained from Eq. (59) are given in Appendix D.
FRI;K Z r iu
SI
Z eKiut
FJ;L
eKiut nK ds
R
LZ1 JZ1
3 X
2
X
J;L
J;L
J;L
u2 AJ;L
R CaI;K C iuAR CdI;K
(60)
LZ1 JZ1
J;L
where CaJ;L
I;K and CdI;K represent the added mass and damping coefficient of cylinder I in
direction K due to the motion mode L of cylinder J, respectively. The expressions for them
are
J;L
J;L
CaI;K Z r Re4J;L
(61)
R cos1 K d1;L qnK ds Z RerfI;K
SI
J;L
CdJ;L
Z
ru
Im4J;L
R cos1 K d1;L qnK ds Z ImrufI;K
I;K
SI
(62)
254
where
J;L
fI;K
Z 4J;L
cos1 K d1;L qnK ds
R
(63)
SI
1;1
f2;3
1;2
f2;3
1;3
f2;3
2;1
f2;3
2;2
f2;3
1;1
f1;1
2;1
f1;1
1;2
f1;2
1;3
f1;2
2;2
f1;2
1;2
f1;3
1;3
f1;3
2;2
f1;3
2;1
f2;1
1;2
f2;2
1;3
f2;2
2;2
f2;2
1;2
f2;3
1;3
f2;3
2;2
f2;3
6
6 0
6
6
6 0
6
Z6
6 1;1
6 f2;1
6
6
6 0
4
0
2;3
f1;1
7
2;3 7
f1;2
7
7
2;3 7
f1;3 7
7
2;3 7
7
f2;1
7
2;3 7
f2;2 7
5
2;3
f2;3
7
2;3 7
f1;2
7
7
2;3 7
f1;3 7
7
7
0 7
7
2;3 7
7
f2;2
5
(64)
2;3
f2;3
As we know, f is a symmetrical matrix, so are the matrices for the added masses and
damping coefficients, which can be used to verify indirectly the correctness of the
expressions for the radiated potentials. The expressions for the nonzero elements in f are
given in Appendix E for convenience to readers.
255
Table 1
Geometrical parameters for the calculation
Case no.
d1/h1
R/h1
e1/h1
e2/h1
1
2
3
4
5
6
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.5
1.0
0.25
0.4
0.7
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.35
0.5
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
Fig. 2. Dimensionless vertical forces on cylinders 1 and 2 of cases 1, 2 and 3. (a) Vertical force on cylinder 1 of
case 1. (b) Vertical force on cylinder 2 of case 1. (c) Vertical force on cylinder 1 of case 2. (d) Vertical force on
cylinder 2 of case 2. (e) Vertical force on cylinder 1 of case 3. (f) Vertical force on cylinder 2 of case 3.
256
Fig. 3. Dimensionless horizontal forces on cylinders 1 and 2 of cases 1, 2 and 3. (a) Horizontal force on
cylinder 1 of case 1. (b) Horizontal force on cylinder 2 of case 1. (c) Horizontal force on cylinder 1 of case 2.
(d) Horizontal force on cylinder 2 of case 2. (e) Horizontal force on cylinder 1 of case 3. (f) Horizontal force on
cylinder 2 of case 3.
the diffracted potential is confirmed. After this, we can use the diffracted potential to
verify the correctness of the expressions for the radiated potentials of sway and roll
motions. In addition, the symmetry of the matrices for the added masses and damping
coefficients can also be used to verify indirectly the correctness of the expressions for
the radiated potentials of sway and roll motions, which will be illustrated in the
following.
257
Fig. 4. Dimensionless torques on cylinders 1 and 2 of cases 1, 2 and 3 with z0Z0. (a) Torque on cylinder 1 of
case 1. (b) Torque on cylinder 2 of case 1. (c) Torque on cylinder 1 of case 2. (d) Torque on cylinder 2 of case 2.
(e) Torque of cylinder 1 of case 3. (f) Torque on cylinder 2 of case 3.
The geometrical parameters, shown in Table 1 of cases 13, are taken from Berggren
and Johansson (1992) where they were used for the calculation of the hydrodynamic
coefficients of heave motion. Here we use them to calculate wave forces and the
hydrodynamic coefficients of sway and roll motions which were not considered in
Berggren and Johansson (1992) and to verify the expressions for the radiated and
diffracted potentials.
258
Fig. 5. Asymmetrical quantities of dimensionless added masses and damping coefficients. (a) Dimensionless
heave added mass. (b) Dimensionless heave damping. (c) Dimensionless surge added mass. (d) Dimensionless
surge damping. (e) Dimensionless pitch added mass. (f) Dimensionless pitch damping.
In our computations the first 30 terms and 30!30 terms in the infinite series of
the radiated and diffracted potentials are taken, respectively. The wave forces and
the hydrodynamic coefficients shown in all figures of the following sections are
nondimensionlized as follows (JZ1,2; LZ1,2,3)
(
F
J;L
J;L
j=rgpR2 A L Z 1; 2
jFW
J;L
j=rgpR3 A L Z 3
jFW
259
Fig. 6. Asymmetrical quantities of dimensionless added masses and damping coefficients. (a) Dimensionless
heave added mass. (b) Dimensionless heave damping. (c) Dimensionless surge added mass. (d) Dimensionless
surge damping. (e) Dimensionless pitch added mass. (f) Dimensionless pitch damping.
Ca1J;L
I;K Z
8 J;L
>
CaI;K =rpR2 d1 L Z 1; 2; K Z 1; 2
>
>
>
>
>
3
< CaJ;L
I;K =rpR d1 L Z 1; 2; K Z 3
3
>
>
CaJ;L
>
I;K =rpR d1 L Z 3; K Z 1; 2
>
>
>
: J;L
CaI;K =rpR4 d1 L Z 3; K Z 3
260
Fig. 7. Symmetrical quantities of dimensionless added masses and damping coefficients of case 1.
Cd1J;L
I;K Z
8 J;L
>
CdI;K =rpR2 d1 u
>
>
>
>
>
3
< CdJ;L
I;K =rpR d1 u
>
>
CdJ;L =rpR3 d1 u
>
> I;K
>
>
:
4
CdJ;L
I;K =rpR d1 u
L Z 1; 2; K Z 1; 2
L Z 1; 2; K Z 3
L Z 3; K Z 1; 2
L Z 3; K Z 3
Fig. 2(a) and (b) shows the vertical forces on cylinder 1 and 2 of case 1,
respectively. Fig. 2(c) and (d) gives the vertical forces of case 2, and the vertical
261
Fig. 8. Symmetrical quantities of dimensionless added masses and damping coefficients of case 1.
forces of case 3 are illustrated in Fig. 2(e) and (f) where the solid lines and circles
represent the results calculated by use of Eqs. (58) and (59), respectively. It can be
seen from these figures that for all cases the results given by Eq. (58) are the same
as those calculated by use of Eq. (59), which illustrates that the expressions for
the diffracted potentials are correct due to the correctness of the expressions for the
heave motion.
Figs. 3 and 4 present the horizontal forces and the roll torques computed by Eqs.
(58) and (59), respectively. We can see the two results obtained by Eqs. (58) and (59)
are the same, which indicates that the expressions for the radiated potentials are
262
Fig. 9. Hydrodynamic effects of the cylinders radii on excitation forces. (a) Vertical force on cylinder 1.
(b) Vertical force on cylinder 2. (c) Horizontal force on cylinder 1. (d) Horizontal force on cylinder 2. (e) Pitch
torque on cylinder 1. (f) Pitch torque on cylinder 2.
correct. To further verify the correctness of the expressions for the radiated potentials,
we compute the added masses and damping coefficients shown in Figs. 58. The
results of the diagonal elements in the matrices for the added masses and damping
coefficients are presented in Figs. 5 and 6, and the values of the non-diagonal
symmetrical elements are given in Figs. 7 and 8. It can be seen from Figs. 7 and 8
that the values of the symmetrical elements are all the same which indicates further
that the expressions for the radiated potentials are correct.
263
Fig. 10. Hydrodynamic effects of the cylinders radii on added masses and damping coefficients.
(a) Dimensionless heave added mass. (b) Dimensionless heave damping. (c) Dimensionless surge added mass.
(d) Dimensionless surge damping. (e) Dimensionless pitch added mass. (f) Dimensionless pitch damping.
264
Fig. 11. Hydrodynamic effects of the cylinders radii on added masses and damping coefficients.
(a) Dimensionless heave added mass. (b) Dimensionless heave damping. (c) Dimensionless surge added mass.
(d) Dimensionless surge damping. (e) Dimensionless pitch added mass. (f) Dimensionless pitch damping.
The hydrodynamic effects of the cylinders radii on the dimensionless excitation forces
are shown in Fig. 9. For fixed d1/h1, e1/h1 and e2/h1, the lager the radii of the cylinders, the
smaller the dimensionless vertical and horizontal wave forces and the larger the
dimensionless roll torque on cylinder 1 and the smaller the dimensionless roll torque on
cylinder 2.
Figs. 10 and 11 illustrate the hydrodynamic effects of the cylinders radii on the
dimensionless added mass and damping coefficients. For fixed d1/h1, e1/h1 and e2/h1,
1;1
1;3
1;3
2;1
2;1
2;3
2;3
2;2
Ca11;1
1;1 , Cd11;1 , Ca11;3 , Cd11;3 , Ca12;1 , Cd12;1 , Ca12;3 , Cd12;3 , and Cd12;2
265
1;2
2;2
increase with the augment of the cylinders radii, while Ca11;2
1;2 , Cd11;2 and Ca12;2
decrease.
In a sum, the rule of the influence of the cylinders radii on the hydrodynamic properties
is relatively simple and deserves attention of designers.
6. Conclusions
In order to analyze the dynamics of a system in waves, it is necessary to study the
hydrodynamic coefficients and wave forces so as to obtain some important information for
designers. Here the method of separation of variables and the method of matched
eigenfunction expansion are used to obtain the analytical expressions for the radiated and
diffracted potentials. By using the analytical expressions, the hydrodynamic coefficients
and wave forces are calculated for some specific examples, and the hydrodynamic effects
of the radius on the hydrodynamic properties of the cylinders are investigated, which may
provide some useful information for designers.
Acknowledgements
This research is supported by the Chinese Academy of Sciences Foundation under
Grant No. KGCX2-SW-305, the High Tech Research and Development (863) Program of
China under Grant No. 2003AA516010, Chinese National Science Fund for Distinguished
Young Scholars under Grant No. 50125924 and the National Natural Science Foundation
of China under grant Nos. 50379001 and 10332050.
J;L
J;L
Appendix A. Expressions for the elements in SR
and FR
SJ;L
Ri;j Z Elj ; bi
(
SJ;L
Ri;NCi
(A1)
Kh2 R1Kd1;L
iZ1
Kh2 =2
iO 1
(A2)
J;L
FRi
Z PJ;L
1i
(A3)
SJ;L
RNCi;j Z Elj ; gi
(A4)
(
SJ;L
RNCi;2NCi
J;L
FRNCi
Z PJ;L
2i
Kh3 R1Kd1;L
iZ1
Kh3 =2
iO 1
(A5)
(A6)
266
SJ;L
R2NCi;i Z Dl 1 K d1;L ; jNli
(
SJ;L
R2NCi;NCj
(
SJ;L
R2Ni;2Nj
(A7)
(A8)
jO 1
(A9)
jO 1
J;L
Z PJ;L
FR2NCi
3i
(A10)
where iZ1,2,.,N; jZ1,2,.,N; LZ1,2,3; JZ1,2. All the other elements in SJ;L
are zero.
R
m
Appendix B. Expressions for the elements in SD
and Fm
D
Sm
Di;j Z Elj ; bi
(
Sm
Di;NCi
(B1)
Kh2 Rm
iZ1
Kh2 =2
iO 1
(B2)
m
FDi
Z P4 m; i
(B3)
Sm
DNCi;j Z Elj ; gi
(B4)
(
Sm
DNCi;2NCi
Kh3 Rm
iZ1
Kh3 =2
iO 1
(B5)
m
FDNCi
Z P5 m; i
Sm
D2NCi;i Z
(B6)
li Rm0 li RNl i
Rm li R
Sm
D2NCi;NCj Z
8
<
(B7)
sinli h1 K d1 K sinli h1 K e1
li
: KD m; jEl ; b
b
i j
Sm
D2NCi;2NCj Z
KmRmK1
8
<
sinli h3
l
: KD m; jEl i; g
g
i
j
KmRmK1
j Z1
(B8)
jO 1
j Z1
(B9)
jO 1
m
FD2NCi
Z P6 m; i
(B10)
Sm
D
are zero.
"
N
C0;1 K B0;1 R2 X
2;1
C
Z 2pr iu
W0n
FW
2
nZ2
1;2
ZKr ipuR
FW
N
X
267
(C1)
Kd1 nZ1
(C2)
2;2
FW
ZKr ipuR
Ke1 X
N
Ke2 nZ1
1;3
FW
ZKpr iuR
N
X
0
A1;n
Kd1
nZ1
"
#
N
B1;1 R4 X
B1;n R2 cosbn h2 I2 bn R
C
Kpr iu
CCF2 CTk1
I1 bn R
bn
4
nZ2
2;3
ZKpr iuR
FWD
N
X
Ke1
A1;n
nZ1
(C5)
Ke2
)
N
C1;1 KB1;1 R4 X
C
W1n CCF2 CTk2
Kpr iu
4
nZ2
(C6)
where
CF2 ZK
2 iprgARJ1 kR
coshkh1
CTk1 Z
CTk2 Z
268
RI1 gn R
RI b R
KB0;n 1 n
gn I0 gn R
bn I0 bn R
R2 I2 gn R
R2 I2 bn R
KB1;n
gn I1 gn R
bn I1 bn R
R (X
N
CCB3
CCL1
)
N
Kr 2 =2 X
1;1 I0 bn r
J krr dr
C
Bn
2h2
I0 bn R 0
nZ1
I g r
Cn1;1 cosgn h3 0 n
I0 gn R
nZ1
0
N
X
A1;1
n
0
)
J0 krr dr
Ke1
Fk; ln ; z;h1 dz
D1
Ke2
Kd1
nZ1
1;2
FW
Z CF2
R (
KiCB2
R (
CiCB3
N
X
CCL2
nZ1
B1;2
1 rC
C11;2 r C
A1;2
n
0
Kd1
N
X
I1 bn r
B1;2
n
I
1 bn R
nZ2
)
J1 krr dr
N
X
I g r
Cn1;2 cosgn h3 1 n
I
1 gn R
nZ2
Fk;ln ; z;h1 dz C
Ke1
Ke2
)
J1 krr dr
Fk;ln ; z; h1 dz
D2
1;3
FW
ZKiCF1 coshkh1 Kd1
269
R2 J2 kR
CCF2 CTk1
k
)
R (
N
X
h22 r Kr 3 =4
I1 bn r
1;3
1;3
CiCB1
K
CB1 r C
Bn cosbn h2
J krr dr
2h2
I1 bn R 1
0
nZ2
R (
KiCB2
R (
CiCB3
CCL2
N
X
)
N
X
r3
1;3
1;3 I1 bn r
J krr dr
CB1 r C
Bn
I1 bn R 1
8h2
nZ2
C11;3 r C
A1;3
n
nZ1
0
N
X
I g r
Cn1;3 cosgn h3 1 n
I
1 gn R
nZ2
Fk;ln ; z; h1 dz C
Ke1
)
J1 krr dr
Fk; ln ;z; h1 dz
D2
Ke2
Kd1
where CB1 ZKCF1 sinhkh1 Kd1 , CB2 ZKCF1 sinhkh1 Ke1 , CB3 ZKCF1 sinhkh3 ,
CL1 ZKCF1 RJ1 kR, CL2 ZiCF1 RJ0 kRKJ2 kR=2, CF1 Z2prgkA=coshkh1 ,
Fk; ln ;z; h1 ZcoshkzCh1 cosln zCh1 .
Appendix E. Expressions for the nonzero elements in f
"
#
N
2
X
h 2 R2
R4
B1;1
R
RI
b
R
1
n
1;1
1;1
K
C
f1;1 Z 2p
Bn cosbn h2
C 1
bn I0 bn R
4
16h2
2
nZ2
"
2;1
f1;1
N
R4
B2;1 R2 X
RI b R
C
Z 2p
C 1
B2;1
cosbn h2 1 n
n
b
16h2
2
n I0 bn R
nZ2
(E1)
#
(E2)
1;1
f2;1
N
2
X
R4
C 1;1 K B1;1
RI g R
1 R
C
C 1
Cn1;1 cosgn h3 1 n
gn I0 gn R
16h2
2
nZ2
)
N
X
RI1 bn R
K
B1;1
n
b
n I0 bn R
nZ2
Z 2p
(
2;1
f2;1
Z 2p
h2 C h3 R2 R4
K
4
16
2
1
1
C 2;1 K B2;1
1 R
C
C 1
h2 h3
2
N
X
RI g R
RI1 bn R
C
Cn2;1 cosgn h3 1 n K
B2;1
n
gn I0 gn R nZ2
bn I0 bn R
nZ2
N
X
j;l
f1;2
Z KRp
N
X
nZ1
Aj;l
n
(E3)
sinln h1 K sinln h1 K d1
ln
(E4)
(E5)
270
j;l
f2;2
Z KRp
Anj;l
nZ1
N
X
j;l
Z KpR
f1;3
nZ1
Anj;l
sinln h1 K e1 K sinln h1 K e2
ln
0
(E6)
cosln z C h1 z K z0 dz
Kd1
"
#
N
B1j;l R4 X
R2 I2 bn R
j;l
j;l
C
Bn cosbn h2
Kp
K pfP1;3
b
4
I
b
R
n
1
n
nZ2
(E7)
)
N
4
2
2
X
C1j;l KBj;l
R
R
I
g
R
R
I
b
R
2
n
2
n
1
C
KBj;l
Cnj;l cosgn h3
n
gn I1 gn R
bn I1 bn R
4
nZ2
N
Ke1
X
j;l
Aj;l
cosln zCh1 zKz0 dzKpfP2;3
(E8)
KpR
n
j;l
ZKp
f2;3
nZ1
Ke2
1;2
2;2
1;2
2;2
ZfP1;3
ZfP2;3
ZfP2;3
Z0
fP1;3
j Z1
j Z2
8
R6
>
>
<K
48h2
j;3
fP2;3
Z
6
>
R
1
1
R4 h2 C h3
>
:
C
K
8
48 h2 h3
j Z1
j Z2
References
Berggren, L., Johansson, M., 1992. Hydrodynamic coefficients of a wave energy device consisting of a buoy and a
submerged plate. Applied Ocean Research 14, 5158.
Bhatta, D.D., Rahman, M., 2003. On scattering and radiation problem for a cylinder in water of finite depth.
International Journal of Engineering Science 41, 931967.
Black, J.L., Mei, C.C., Bray, M.C.G., 1971. Radiation and scattering of water waves by rigid bodies. Journal of
fluid mechanics 46, 151164.
Calisal, S.M., Sabuncu, T., 1984. Hydrodynamic coefficients for vertical composite cylinders. Ocean Engineering
11 (5), 529542.
Calisal, S.M., Sabuncu, T., 1993. A generalized method for the calculation of hydrodynamic forces on
discontinuous vertical cylinders. Ocean Engineering 20 (1), 118.
Eidsmoen, H., 1995. Hydrodynamic parameters for a two-body axisymmetric system. Applied Ocean Research
17, 103115.
Kagemoto, H., Yue, D.K.P., 1986. Interactions among multiple three-dimensional bodies in water waves: an
exact algebraic method. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 166, 189209.
Linton, C.M., Evans, D.V., 1993. Hydrodynamic characteristics of bodies in Channels. Journal of Fluid
Mechanics 252, 647666.
271
McIver, P., Bennett, G.S., 1993. Scattering of water waves by axisymmetric bodies in a channel. Journal of
Engineering Mathematics 27, 129.
Sabuncu, T., Calisal, S., 1981. Hydrodynamic coefficients for vertical circular cylinders at finite depth. Ocean
Engineering 8, 2563.
Simon, M.J., 1982. Multiple scattering in arrays of axisymmetric wave-energy devices, Part 1. A matrix method
using a plane-wave approximation. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 120, 125.
Williams, A.N., Abul-Azm, A.G., 1989. Hydrodynamic interactions in floating cylinder arraysII. Wave
radiation. Ocean Engineering 16 (3), 217263.
Williams, A.N., Demirbilek, Z., 1988. Hydrodynamic interactions in floating cylinder arraysI. Wave scattering.
Ocean Engineering 15 (6), 549583.
Williams, A.N., Rangappa, T., 1994. Approximate hydrodynamic analysis of multi-column ocean structures.
Ocean Engineering 21 (6), 519573.
Williams, A.N., Li, W., Wang, K.H., 2000. Water wave interaction with a floating porous cylinder. Ocean
Engineering 27, 128.
Wu, B.J., Zheng, Y.H., You, Y.G., Sun, X.Y., Chen, Y., 2004. On diffraction and radiation problem for a cylinder
over a caisson in water of finite depth. International Journal of Engineering Science 42, 11931213.
Yeung, R.W., 1981. Added mass and damping of a vertical cylinder in finite-depth waters. Applied Ocean
Research 3 (3), 119133.
Yeung, R.W., Sphaier, S.H., 1989. Wave-interference effects on a truncated cylinder in a channel. Journal of
Engineering Mathematics 23, 95117.