Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
$b460945
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike / http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#cc-by-nc-sa-4.0
Coins from
the Excavations
at Curium, 1932-1953
By D. H. COX
NEW YORK
I959
PRINTED IN GERMANY
AT J. J. AUGUSTIN. GLUCKSTADT
Number 145
PUBLICATION COMMITTEE
JOHN V. A. FINE
THOMAS O. MABBOTT
EDITORIAL STAFF
CONTENTS
PREFACE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - - - - -
INTRODUCTION . . . . . . .
ABBREVIATIONS . . . . . . . . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
CATALOGUE OF COINS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
COMMENTARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . . . . . . . 86
PREFACE
siasm and support made their continued operation possible. His tragic
to a close.
in Cyprus for sending the coins on loan to the United States for study,
notes.
vii
INTRODUCTION
Limassol on the road to Paphos and near the modern village of Epi-
scopi. Here excavations were carried out under the auspices of the
break of about ten years during the war and its aftermath. The coins
from that excavation are here catalogued, surface finds dated after
The site, inhabited from the bronze age to the present, is spread
out along six kilometers of road. To the east of Episcopi are the
ced some coins showing habitation also in historic times. West of the
village on a cliff overlooking the sea stands the Roman citadel with
baths and theatre adjacent. Somewhat farther west and a little in-
land is the stadium. From these areas the coins were largely Roman.
Hylates. This site produced the earliest of the coins found and also the
the eighth century B.C. to about the end of the fourth A.D. there was
uity emerged. The coins represent only phases in the life of the city.
the early fourth century B.C. there was a mint at Curium producing
silver staters and fractions. None of these silver coins was found, but
some small bronzes possibly contemporary with the silver and other
bronzes from the time of Euagoras II seem to confirm the fact that
ix
X Introduction
there was such a mint. The bulk of the Greek coins from the excava-
tions was Ptolemaic from the mint of Paphos. These support to a re-
tal work on the coins of the Ptolemies. Poole earlier in the British
coins add little to the combined work of these three scholars beyond
the Roman Republic were found. Among the imperial coins there are
comparatively few specimens from the Cyprus mint, the majority are
imported from Rome and various Asia Minor mints. The proportion
large money.
The coins throw little new light on the trade relations of Curium.
It is known that the Jews did a lively business in Cyprus in the first
centuries B.C. and A.D., and this the number of Jewish coins confirms.
But from places more remote than Syria or Palestine only single coins
were found. The four small coins from Cyzicus are the exception. The
fourth century Roman coins struck at Asia Minor mints seem indica-
The later coins too are not without interest. Quantities of small
in the time of Justinian. Among these were a few coins of the Vandals
stans II in Cyprus. The coins of the medieval kings of Cyprus are all
surface finds. Few Arabic coins were found and none included in the
catalogue.
Coins marked with asterisks in the Catalogue are more fully de-
Antioch, iv
Ath. Agora, ii
BMC
Babelon
Bellinger
C.
Dattari
Giesecke
Gnecchi
Grant
ABBREVIATIONS
ceton, 1952).
ides (1893).
et de la Commagne (1890).
(Cambridge, 1946).
xi
xii
Abbreviations
Hill
Im.-B.
M.
Madden
Mionnet
Newell
Pearce
RIC
Sabatier
Sch.
SV.
Sv. iv.
Tolstoi
190102).
1883).
romaines (18061837).
1918).
(London, 1933).
1923-).
(Paris, 1862).
1878).
(Athens, 19041908).
xxv, 1906, pp. 344 ff. Both the commentary and the review
Society, 1920- )
CATALOGUE OF COIN'S
*1
*2
*3
*4
*5
*6
*7
CYPRUS
Curium
c. 390386 B.C.
c. 386373 B.C.
c. 386373 B.C.
of stag
Curium
c. 36835I B.C.
c. 368351 B.C.
p. I27, I5 PLATE I
Uncertain mint
c. 332-316 B.C.
Curium(?)
c. 332-316 B.C.
c. 332-316 B.C.
seated l.
1*
7a.
8a.
10
11
12
13
*14
*15
16
Uncertain mint
c. 332-316 B.C.
c. 332-316 B.C.
c. 332-316 B.C.
Paphos
c. 332-316 B.C.
Salamis
c. 332-316 B.C.
Tarsus, Cilicia
c. 332-316 B.C.
Uncertain mint
c. 332-316 B.C.
obscure
I921 mm.
obscure
I518 mm.
obscure
IO-I2 mm.
quiver; XA above
p. 65, 87
and G) above
I618 mm.
Salamis
p. 18
I4 mm. ibid.
Catalogue of Coins 5
monogram
I517 mm.
Salamis
below
Uncertain mint
I517 mm.
Tarsus (?)
Uncertain mint
CITIES IN CYPRUS
SALAMIS (3)
p. 60, 69ff.
illegible
p. 6I, 74
in field,
p. 64, 85 PLATE I
24
25
26
27
28
*29
MARIUM (2)
bolt; illegible
p. 379, 87 PLATE I
PAPHOS (8)
square
P. 4I, 4I
illegible
p. 44, 48
high crown
Ctm rose
Egypt
Sv. 43 PLATE II
Catalogue of Coins 7
diadem
thunderbolt
II IIlm. Sv. 52
Cyprus
headdress
on thunderbolt
20 mm. Sv. 74
field
21 mm. Sv. 78
by taenia 2
Egypt
Eagle 1. on thunderbolt; in
1. field, &
Cyprus
horned diad.
*38
*39
40
*41
*42
*43
43a
*44
*45
*46
46a
*47
*48
*49
. 295-29I B.C.
. 295-29I B.C.
. 29529I B.C.
. 290285 B.C.
. 290285 B.C.
. 290285 B.C.
. 290285 B.C.
. 290285 B.C.
. 290285 B.C.
. 290285 B.C.
. 290285 B.C.
. 290285 B.C.
. 290285 B.C.
. 290285 B.C.
above Al
helmet
Similar; A / E in field
A / H'
A/>
Similar; in field, HP
Similar; illegible
PLATE II
PLATE II
PLATE II
Catalogue of Coins
*50
*51
*52
*53
*54
*55
*56
*57
*58
Egypt
267266 B.C.
267266 B.C.
266265 B.C.
263-262 B.C.
256-255 B.C.
256-255 B.C.
253252 B.C.
Cyprus
285266 B.C.
*59
*60
285284 B.C.
282-281 B.C.
28I-280 B.C.
A between legs
A between legs
legs
O between legs
PLATE II
legs
legs
legs
or 265-264 B.C.
66 285266 B.C.
67 285266 B.C.
68 285266 B.C.
71 a 285266 B.C.
72 285266 B.C.
gram; date, P
ctm... trident
28, 27 mm.
2O Imm.
Catalogue of Coins II
Tyre
club I
club in 1, field
Sidon (?)
on thunderbolt; cornucopiae in
1. field; illegible
same symbol
Cyprus
of Aphrodite
Phoenicia
Uncertain mint
in field, cornucopiae
Cyprus
cornucopiae
Cyprus
lotus in l. field
PLATE III
Paphos
Head of Isis r.
shoulder; in field, W
Catalogue of Coins I3
91
*92
*93
94
*95
*96
97
98
*99
100
c. 173146 B.C.
c. 173146 B.C.
c. 173146 B.C.
c. 173I46 B.C.
c. I73I46 3.C.
c. 173146 B.C.
over 1. shoulder
scepter
Similar / Similar I8
Cyprus
168163 B.C.
168163 B.C.
cornucopiae in l. field
Similar / Similar 7
Cyprus
I81-163 B.C.
/ Eagle l.
Salamis
I29 B.C.
I4
*101
102
103
104
105
Paphos
I44 B.C.
I43 B.C.
I42 B.C.
I36 B.C.
I35 B.C.
*106
*107
*108
*109
*110
c. I39130 B.C.
c. I39130 B.C.
Cyprus, uncertain
c. 120-II6 B.C.
over lotus
lotus
over shoulder
mint
helmet in l. field
Paphos
c. II480 B.C.
Catalogue of Coins I5
Paphos
cornucopiae
missing or illegible
Paphos
star above T
strings in l. field
PTOLEMY XIII (Neos Dionysos), 80-58 B.C. and 5551 B.C. (14)
Cyprus
aplustre in 1, field
in l. field
Cyprus
Cyprus
cornucopiae in l. field
3I mm.
p. lxxxi, 2 PLATE V
Catalogue of Coins
17
IMPERIAL TIMES
Nike 1.
Salaminios stg. l.
Star at r.
25a and 26
dite at Paphos
I8
136
137
138
139
*140
141
142
4I-54A.D.
4I-54A.D.
II2-II7 A.D.
II2II7 A.D.
/(a)N in wreath
TIPOKAOY. . . ; in centre,
KYTIPI / GON
Temple of Aphrodite at
Paphos
KOIN ON KYTIPION
c. I4O A.D.
c. I4O A.D.
/ Similar
I93-2II A.D.
Aphrodite at Paphos
Catalogue of Coins I9
AG above star
1621 mm.
MEGARA (1)
CORINTH (1)
p. 262, Io58
feet
2O
150
151
*152
*153
*154
*155
SICYON (1)
p. 55,234f.
in field
PERGAMUM (1)
Caracalla,
holds branch
Maximinus,
ed beneath tree
Catalogue of Coins
*156
157
158
159
160
161
*162
Antoninus Pius,
seated l.
below, illegible
RHODES (1)
illegible
Caracalla,
Caracalla,
B.C. grapes
Seleucus I,
Demetrius I,
(Sidon) Galley r.
p. Ioo, 786
Catalogue of Coins 23
*170
171
172
*173
174
175
176
*177
*178
Alexander Bala,
I50-I45 B.C.
Alexander II,
I28-123 B.C.
Antiochus VIII,
I2596 B.C.
(Antioch)
Augustus,
I4 B.C.27 A.D.
After 14 B.C.
C. 4-5 A.D.
Macrinus,
217-218 A.D.
Diadumenian,
217-218 A.D.
Elagabalus,
218222 A.D.
opatra r. / Cornucopiae
Effaced / Cornucopiae I
v. Pl. III, 21
illeg.
Pl. III, 22
A below
24
*179
180
181
182
183
184
185
*186
Severus Alexander,
LAODICEA-ad-MARE (3)
Elagabalus,
r. in distyle shrine
Septimus Severus,
on stool
CARNE (1)
Catalogue of Coins
25
187
188
189
*190
191
192
193
194
195
Hadrian,
II7 A.D.
Macrinus,
217-218 A.D.
Elagabalus,
218222 A.D.
I53-I54 A.D.
TRIPOLIS (3)
Dioscuri
Bust r. / Similar
TYRE (2)
on galley l.
PLATE VII
JUDAEA (22)
Alexander Jannaeus,
Io376 B.C.
Herod Archelaus,
4 B.C.6 A.D.
3031 A.D.
Anchor / Star
trastyle temple
2930 A.D.
pulum
Herod Agrippa,
ears of barley
Agrippa II,
sed palms
within wreath
Commodus,
vinities in temple
Aretas IV,
r. / Crossed cornucopiae
Caracalla,
Goddess
Catalogue of Coins 27
204
205
206
207
*208
*209
*210
*211
*212
Trajan,
ble date
Hadrian,
Antoninus Pius,
I9 mm.
ROMAN COINS
The East
in wreath
AGRIPPA (1)
Rome
28
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
Rome
96 A.D.
Rome
IO4III
c. II4II5
98117
Rome
II9138
Nordicum
II7138
|VDAIC CALVNANA
and Dacian
seated l.
Ses.
Head r, laur. / P M TR P
in wreath
Rome
I6I
I4516I
Pyre.
AVG SC Felicitas l.
Catalogue of Coins
29
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
Rome
Head of Marcus r.
Rome
Providential.
Rome
hands
SC Clementia 1.
PIVS / CONSECRATIO
Rome
Rome
Rome
children
Rome
Hercules at altar
Catalogue of Coins
3I
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
|| PP SC Minerva at altar
V PP SC Minerva
Ses.
Rome
AVGG, IN CARTH
Rome
Rome
As BMC, v, p. 489,293
Rome
Ses.
Rome
REDVCI Fortuna 1.
v, p. 561, 205
Rome
GVSTI SC Annona 1.
ed l.
scribing shield
AVGVSTI SC Victory l.
VLTOR SC MarS r.
Catalogue of Coins
33
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
LICA SC Spes 1.
stg. figure
Dup.
Rome
PVBLICA SC Felicitas 1.
Rome
two standards
standards
snake at altar
GERMANICA SC Victory
34
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
Rome
Rome
Rome
AVG SC Sol 1.
Jupiter r.
SC Laetitia 1.
Catalogue of Coins
35
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
243
24I-244
24I-244
243-244
243-244
243-244
243-244
Rome
244-247
246
244-249
244-249
PP SC Apollo seated 1.
Similar / PM TR P VI COS
SC Securitas seated 1.
SC Felicitas 1.
Similar / FELICITASTEM-
NAT SC Mars r.
Similar / VICTORIAAETER
and captive
AVGG Aequitas 1.
COS PP SC FelicitaS 1.
SC Aequitas l.
SC Annona l.
36
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
EXERCITVS SC Four
standards
SC Laetitia 1.
Rome
SC Pietas 1.
Rome
Same type
SC Victory running 1.
Rome
and child
Catalogue of Coins
37
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
Rome
25I
IVVENTVTIS SC Apollo
seated l.
Rome
25I-253
25I-253
25I-253
Rome
25I-253
25I-253
25I-253
Rome
253
in circular temple
PVBLICA SC FelicitaS 1.
Similar / LIBERALITAS
AVGG SC Liberalitas 1.
Pax stg. l.
Rome
AVGG SC Victory 1.
Rome
Ant.
SC Pax 1.
AVGG SC Concordia 1.
Antioch
GINA Juno 1.
Antioch
Catalogue of Coins
39
308
309
310
311
312
313
Antioch
275-276
Antioch
277282
Cyzicus
282-283
Antioch
282-283
Cyzicus
283284
Antioch
282-283
A, A., A', , S.
ter;
Same type
Similar / CLEMENTIA
piter; A
4O
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
283284
Antioch
282-284
Heraclea
c. 296
Cyzicus
284296
c. 296
Antioch
c. 299
285-296
Uncertain mint
Similar / Similar; A, T
or and Jupiter; A
Similar / CLEMENTIA
Ant. C., I8
Siscia
c. 300-305
Catalogue of Coins
4I
323
324
325
*326
327
328
329
330
Heraclea
c. 296
Cyzicus
c. 293
c. 296305
Antioch
c. 285295
c. 285-295
Alexandria
c. 305
Uncertain mint
Jupiter; T
Similar / Similar; T, A, S
and Hercules; B
piter;
Jupiter; A, T
Jupiter
Heraclea
c. 296
Similar / Similar; A
42
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
Cyzicus
Jupiter; B
Heraclea
Jupiter
Alexandria
Jupiter; B
Uncertain mint
Verse
AE 2
Alexandria
Jupiter; A
Catalogue of Coins 43
Cyzicus
Antioch
TORIS Similar;
Uncertain mint
Genius l.
ANTIOCH-Autonomous
Apollo r.;
Ostia
Rome
(2), S
AE 3 M., i, p. 310, I. 2
44
345
*347
348
349
350
351
352
353
Siscia
3I3-3I4
Heraclea
315-317
320-324
Nicomedia
3I3-3I4
318320
Cyzicus
3I3-3I4
317318
318-324
Antioch
3II-312
eagle; T
TIAEAVGG Gate; B
at feet; B
and captive; B
eagle; A
SERVATOR! Similar; A
Catalogue of Coins
45
354
355
356
*357
358
359
360
361
362
317318
318319
Nicomedia
318-324
Antioch
3I5-317
SERVATORI Similar; S
and captive; A
Rome
3I2-3I3
3I3317
317-320
324-326
Ostia
3I2-313
CONAITI Sol 1.
Similar / Similar; R = P, RT
AE 3 M., i, p. 210, I. I
AE 3 M., i, p. 220, II
TIAEAVGG Gate; S
AE 3 M., i, p. 238, I
TO CONIITI Sol 1.
46
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
Ticinum
320-324
Treves (?)
320-324
Arles
3I4317
317-320
Thessalonica
320-324
324-326
Constantinople
333-335
After 337
After 337
Nicomedia
After 337
Cyzicus
324-326
TT
EXERCIT Standard
TO COMITI Soll.; S
Similar / Similar
VI
Similar / PROVIDENTIAE
AVGG Gate; A
Similar / VN MR Pietas r.
Similar / Similar; A, T
TIAEAVGG Gate; T
Catalogue of Coins
47
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
333-335
335-337
After 337
Antioch
315-317
318-324
324-326
After 337
Alexandria
3I3-3I4
318-324
324-326
two standards; .
Similar / Similar; A
Veiled head r. / VN MR
Pietas r.; H
SERVATOR! Similar; A,
TIAEAVGG Gate; A, T,
(2)
SERVATOR! Jupiter 1,
eagle; B
and captive; A
Head r. / PROVIDENTIAE
AVGG Gate
two standards; A
tas; T, A
Uncertain mint
TO CONAITI Sol 1.
AE 3 C., 536
two standards
AE 3 C., 254
AE 3 C., 716
Thessalonica
Heraclea
Constantinople
standard;
Nicomedia
Catalogue of Coins
49
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
402
Antioch
c. 335-337
Alexandria
c. 335-340
Uncertain mint
Similar / Similar; 6
Similar / Similar
AE4 C., I9
CONSTANTINOPOLIS (4)
Constantinople
335-340
Antioch
335-340
Uncertain mint
Antioch
324-326
Uncertain mint
Siscia
317-320
Similar / Similar
Similar / Similar
AE 3 C., 2I
HELEN (3)
PVBLICE Securitas 1.
AE 3 C., 4
CRISPUS (2)
IVVENTVTIS Crispus r.
50
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
Heraclea
320-324
Rome
320-324
337-340
Constantinople
335-337
Nicomedia
337-340
Cyzicus
324-326
333-335
Antioch
333-335
wreath; T
GVSTI Emperor; P
AE 3 C., 233
two standards; T
one standard; S
Similar / PROVIDENTAE
CAESS Gate;
two standards; T
Similar / Similar; I
Catalogue of Coins
standard; G (2)
Alexandria
EXERCITVS
Uncertain mint
two standards
AE 3 C., I22
standard
Rome
one standard; T
AE 3 C., 62
Constantinople
AE 3 C, 60
Nicomedia
AE 3 C., 62
Emperor 1.; B
52
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
Cyzicus
335-337
337-340
Antioch
343-348
Alexandria
335-337
343-348
Uncertain mint
one standard; T
AE3 C., 62
XXX in wreath; T
one standard
XXX in wreath; A
AE4 C., 62
XXX in wreath
AE 3 C., I9
Rome
348-353
REPARATIO Emperor on
AE 2 C., 32
Catalogue of Coins
53
430
431
*432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
348-36I
337-361
Siscia
348-356
Thessalonica
337-36I
348-361
Constantinople
333-335
348-353
348-36I
337-361
Heraclea
C. 324
AE 3 C., 45
Emperor
ing emperor; T
AE 2 C., I42
Emperor; A
horseman; T, A
AE 3 C., 45
two standards; S
ing horseman; B, H, I
AE 2 C., 44
Similar / Similar; A, S, Z, IA
AE 3 C., 45
Emperor 1.; B
AE 4 C., 188
54
441
442
443
445
446
447
448
449
337-340
343-348
348-361
Nicomedia
343-348
348-353
348-36I
337-361
Cyzicus
333-337
337-340
348-353
one standard; B
AE 3 C., Io2
XXX in wreath; Z
ing horseman
AE 3 C., 45
XXX in wreath; A
horseman; A
AE 2 C., 44
Similar / Similar
AE3 C., 45
Emperor; B
AE 4 C., 188
standards; A (2), B
AE 3 C., Io2
captives; A, B
AE 2 C., 39
Catalogue of Coins
55
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
348-353
348-36I
337-361
Antioch
333-337
335-337
337-340
343-348
348-353
348-353
348-361
337-361
horseman; T
AE 2 C., 44
Similar / Similar; B, T
AE 3 C., 45
Emperor l.
AE 4 C., 188
two standards; B
ard; B, H
AE 3 C., 95
XXX in wreath; B, T, Z, Bl
captives; A
AE 2 C., 39
S, Z, Bl, Al
AE 2 C., 44
Similar / Similar; A, B, T, A, , S, H
AE 3 C., 45
Emperor l.; A
I6
56
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
Alexandria
335-337
343-348
348-353
348-36I
337-361
Uncertain mint
two standards; A
REPARATIO Emperor,
two captives; A
AE 2 C., 39
man; B, T, A, I
AE3 C., 45
Emperor 1.; A
AE 4 C., 188
AE 3 C., IO4
AE 3 C., IO2
ing horseman
AE 2 C., 44
Similar / Similar
AE 3 C., 45
Phoenix
AE3 C., 58
I6
I2
II
Catalogue of Coins
57
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
AE 4 C., 188
Constantinople
35I-354
Nicomedia
35I-354
Uncertain mint
AE 3. C., 9
Similar / Similar; A
AE 3 C., Io
Similar / Similar
AE 2 C., 7
Rome
361-363
Siscia
355-360
Antioch
355-360
355-360
Uncertain mint
NMVLT XX in Wreath
AE 3 C., 151
REIPVBLICE Emperor; A
and star
AE4 C., 42
man; I
AE 3 C., I4
Emperor; H
AE 4 C., 42
Similar / Similar
AE4 C., 43
58
481
482
483
NMVLT XX in Wreath
AE 3 C., 151
Constantinople
Nicomedia
Antioch
Uncertain mint
Uncertain mint
363-364
AE 3 C., 31
Siscia
364-367
ROMANORVM Emperor
and captive; T
Catalogue of Coins
59
Nicomedia
484 364367
Cyzicus
485 364367
486 364367
Antioch
487 364367
Alexandria
488 364367
489 364367
Uncertain mint
490
491
492
Similar / Similar
Similar / Similar
PVBLICAE Victory; B
Similar / Similar; A
PVBLICAE Victory; A, T
AE 3 C., I2
Emperor stg.
AE 3 C., 21
LICAE Victory
AE 3 C., 37
Rome
493 364375
REIPVBLICAE Victory;
TERTIA
I3
60
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
Thessalonica
364378
Constantinople
364367
Cyzicus
364375
364-375
Nicomedia
364367
Antioch
364367
364367
Alexandria
364-367
Uncertain mint
tive; A, A
PVBLICAE Victory
Similar / Similar; B, A
tive; A
Similar / Similar; A, B, T, A
LICAE Victory; T, A
tive; B, T
LICAE Victory; A, B, T, A
Similar / Similar
AE 3 C., 47
AE 3 C., II
22
I3
Catalogue of Coins
6I
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
Emperor
AE 3 C.,29
Rome
378-383
Thessalonica
378-383
Constantinople
378-383
Antioch
378-383
Uncertain mint
XX in wreath; T
Roma seated
in wreath; A
LICAE Victory
AE 3 C., 34
AE 3 C., 23
AE 4 C., 64
in wreath
AE4 C., 77
Roma seated
AE3 C., 3
62
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
Heraclea
378-383
383388
Heraclea
383388
Constantinople
375378
388-392
Cyzicus
378-383
378-383
Antioch
378-383
378-383
ship
ROMANORVM Emperor on
Constantinople seated
Constantinople seated; B
in wreath
Constantinople seated
ROMANORVM Emperor on
ship;
Catalogue of Coins
63
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
383388
383-392
Uncertain mint
XX in wreath; T
Similar / Similar
AE4 C., 30
Victory l.
AE4 C., 46
in wreath
AE4 C., 73
Rome
378-383
Thessalonica
379383
Constantinople
378-383
392395
Cyzicus
378-393
XX in wreath; T
Roma seated; A
533
534
535
*536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
Antioch
379383
383388
392395
c. 395
Alexandria
379383
383388
Uncertain mint
AE 3
in wreath; A, T
in wreath
AE4 C., 68
Two Victories
AE4 C., 43
AE4 C., 30
tive
AE 2 C., 23
AE 2 C., 19
Catalogue of Coins
65
545
546
547
548
549
*550
551
552
*553
THEODOSIUS I or II (2)
Uncertain mint
AE 4
Similar / Effaced
AE 4
Thessalonica
383388
Constantinople
395400
393-395
393-395
395400
388-395
Nicomedia
395-400
395-400
Cross; A
AE 3 Pearce, p. 88, 33
Cyzicus
wreath; B
AE 3 Pearce, p. 83, 23
AE 4 Pearce, p. 84, 27
Antioch
Cross
AE 4 Pearce, p. 96, 55
AE 3 Pearce, p. 95, 52
perors
AE 4 Pearce, p. 96, 57
Alexandria
Cross; A
AE 4 Pearce, p. 98, 20
AE 3 Pearce, p. 98, 17
Uncertain mint
Two Victories
Catalogue of Coins
564
565
*566
567
568
569
570
571
572
Cross
AE 4 Sabatier, 32
Cross in wreath
in wreath
AE 4 Not in Sabatier
AE 4 Sabatier, 41
AE 4 Sabatier, 38
AE 3 Sabatierii, p. 341
AE 4 Sabatier, 47
in wreath
AE 4 Sabatier, 48
AE 4
Nicomedia
*573 395404
574
Uncertain mint
AE 3 cf. Sabatier, 4
IO
25
68
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
Rome
393-395
395-400
Constantinople
395400
400408
Heraclea
395-400
Nicomedia
400408
395400
Cyzicus
392395
393-400
395-400
FELIX Roma r.
AE 3 Pearce, p. 83, 23
Similar / Similar
AE 4 Pearce, p. 81, 2I
AE 3 Pearce, p. 86, 22
Victory
AE 3 Pearce, p. 88, 33
AE 3 Pearce, p. 83, 23
IO
Catalogue of Coins 69
AE 4 Pearce, p. 84, 25
Three emperors
AE 4 Pearce, p. 84, 27
Antioch
Emperor stg.
B (2), T
AE 3 Pearce, p. 95, 52
AE 4 Pearce, p. 96, 57
Alexandria
AE 3 Pearce, p. 98, 17
AE 4 Pearce, p. 98, 23
Uncertain mint
AE 3 C., 4
AE 4 cf. C., 39
AE 4 C., 26
Three emperors
AE 4 C., 28
70
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
AE4 C., 32
AE 3 C., 56
Rome
393-395
Antioch
395408
Alexandria
395408
Uncertain mint
FELIX Roma r.
AE 3
Similar / Similar; A
AE 3
Similar / Similar
AE 3
Constantinople
425-450
400408
400408
408-450
AE 4 Sabatier, 32f.
Cross
Similar / Similar
I3
62
Catalogue of Coins
7I
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
400408
Antioch
400408
Alexandria
400408
Uncertain mint
Three emperors; B
Similar / Similar
AE 4 Pearce, p. 96, 57
Similar / Similar
AE 4 Pearce, p. 98, 23
Cross
AE 4 Sabatier, 26
AE 4 Sabatier, 29
AE 4 Sabatier, 30
Similar / No inscription.
Cross in wreath
AE 4 Sabatier, 32f.
AE 4 Sabatier, 25
Cyzicus
425-455
Uncertain mint
captive
AE 4 Pearce, p. 84, 28
Similar / Similar
AE 4 C., 5
17
II
72
Rome
Constantinople
Cyzicus
Antioch
Alexandria
Uncertain mint
stantinople seated
stantinople seated
GLORIA ROMANORVM
Three emperors
and captive
SECVRITAS REIPVBLICAE
Victory
stantinople seated
Cross
with wreaths
GLORIA ROMANORVM
GLORIA ROMANORVM
Emperor stg.
GLORIA ROMANORVM
Two emperors
GLORIA ROMANORVM
Three emperors
Catalogue of Coins 73
*618
*619
*620
*621
*622
*623
*624
*625
SECVRITAS REIPVBLICAE 9I
Victory
Two Victories
Inscription in wreath I
Constantinople
Uncertain mint
mark illeg.
above
Constantinople
Io mm. Sabatier, 17
Similar / Lion l. 2
Io mm. Sabatier, I9
Uncertain mint
II mm. Sabatier, I4
verse sceptre
cross in r.
Io mm. Sabatier, 16
9, Iomm. Sabatier, 17
9, IO mm. Sabatier, 19
9 mm. PLATE IX
Constantinople
PLATE IX
Uncertain mint
emperor
Catalogue of Coins 75
*637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
*647
648
649
*650
651
652
c. 408-450
c. 450-457
c. 474-49I
C. 474-49I
Similar / Lion l. I
Similar / Lion r. I
Similar / Gate 2
Similar / A in wreath I
in wreath
of dots
9 mm. PLATE IX
PLATE IX
Similar / al in wreath I
76
*653
654
655
*656
*657
658
659
*660
*661
662
663
664
665
9 mm.
or single line
line border
8 mm. PLATE IX
VANDALS (9)
in wreath
II
Catalogue of Coins
77
*666
667
668
669
*670
671
672
*673
674
530-533
PLATE IX
OSTROGOTHS
Ravenna
in wreath
Italy
BYZANTINE COINS
Constantinople (?)
491518
498518
Nicomedia
498518
Antioch
498518
k! in wreath
, N at r.
I3 mm. BMC, p. 9, 73
e, ABN at r.
78
675
*676
677
*678
679
680
681
682
683
*684
685
686
Constantinople
518527
Nicomedia
518527
Antioch
518527
518527
Uncertain mint
518527
M, stars to r. and l.
X, N to l., to r.
* in wreath
, at r., S
Constantinople
527538
544/5
527538
538565
527565
Nicomedia
527538
Cyzicus
c. 558/9
M, facing bust; A
K, profile bust; A
, at r., Cross
Mnzen Justinian, p. 45
Catalogue of Coins 79
Alexandria
687 527565 | B 4
688 527565 S I
Carthage (?)
PLATE X
Constantinople
Cyzicus
Uncertain mint
Nicomedia
Antioch
Alexandria
698 | B I
8O
699
700
701
702
703
*704
705
*706
707
708
709
Constantinople
585/6 M; year 4
586592 K; years 5, 9, Io
Thessalonica
Nicomedia
587/8 M; year 6
Antioch
583/90 In ; years 2, 8
593/4 M; year 12
584/5 X. X; year 3
Thessalonica
602/3 K; year I
Antioch
date illeg.
Constantinople
Cross potent
Catalogue of Coins 8I
*710
*711
712
713
*714
*715
*716
*717
718
*719
720
*721
2 illeg.
Cyprus
Nicomedia
Cyzicus
Alexandria
Constantinople
PLATE X
82
722
*723
*724
*725
*726
727
728
729
730
*731
641651
651656
655658
659664
663666
Constantinople
c. 9891028
c. 10281031
ANONYMOUS (2)
scription
line inscription
Constantinople
Io591067
Constantinople
III8-II43
facing
Constantinople
II85II95
Catalogue of Coins
*732
*733
734
*735
736
737
738
739
*740
enthroned
Constantinople
PLATE X
MEDIEVAL COINS
CYPRUS
Guido
Henry II
Hugh IV
Pierre I
Pierre II
Anonymous
James I
6*
741
742
743
*744
745
746
747
*748
749
750
751
Uncertain
Cent. Denier
Janus
Denier PLATE X
James II
Uncertain
Denier
Francesco Venier
Lorenzo Priuli
Gerolano Priuli
Uncertain
JERUSALEM
Baldwin II-IV
II
Catalogue of Coins 85
RHODES
Pierre dAubusson
VENICE
Uncertain
Salamis and the throne of his fathers which had fallen into Phoenician
at his court.
(ibid. No. 155), obv.: Hera head between X and A rev.: Lion's scalp.
the fifth century (BMC Cyprus, p. 32, If.) for Stasioikos II, c.
315312 (ibid. p. 33, 4); and at Paphos for Timocharis (?) c. 385 B.C.
(ibid. p. 43,45).
* The historical material on the early rulers of Cyprus included here is largely
drawn from Sir George Hill's History of Cyprus, vol. i. pp. 126ff. Isocrates Cy-
prian Orations, E. S. Forester edition, Oxford 1912, is the best source for
Euagoras I. Diodorus, books xiv ff. passim, also covers this reign as well as that
86
The find spot suggests the coins originated in the island, possibly
at Curium and the type that they are related to a known silver issue
issuing coins there. (H. of C. p. 134, note 3.) The Curium coins refer-
actively assisting in the conquest of the island, and 386 when he was
put to death.
The types on the bronze echo those on the stater. The lion's scalp
tion on the silver and the Greek on the bronze is no bar to their being
Cyprus, p. 57, 55) Greek letters appear side by side with Cypriote
of dots.
3. Head of Apollo r., laur. (?), wearing long hair; border of dots.
specimens, on few are any details clear. They are not much worn,
but badly corroded, swollen and split. The style, difficult (or impos-
* The shape of this shield and those held by Curium terracotta horsemen of
fourth century is the same. See J. and S. Young, Terracotta, Figurines from
the first half on the fourth century and like the types suggestive of
Ionia rather than Cyprus, the work possibly of a Greek artist brought
I). On the somewhat later bronze of the same city the head, as here,
is bound by a taenia. The smaller head, No. 3, with long hair is paral-
Hylates was a refuge for deer (Aelian, N.A., XI, 7). The fragmentary
list of known kings of Curium offers few clues for interpreting the A
issued few coins. His successor, Euagoras II, was possibly a brother,
uncertain. Babelon puts it in 368, Hill in 361 B.C. The earlier date is
here chosen as more consistent with the large number of his coins
found at Curium. In c. 351/o Euagoras lost his throne and was expelled
from Cyprus, but returned, was taken prisoner and executed some-
Salamis. They are no doubt coins of this king, but that they were
a single type from Salamis should turn up at Curium and only eight
improbable. The large number of coins suggests a local mint, and the
to which the king of Salamis could grant the right of coinage (see
there in his own name rather than delegate the right to an unknown
local dynast.
These coins and No. 4 are probably part of the same issue, No. 4
being the half, No. 5, the unit. None of the seventeen coins identified
from the sixth to the third centuries B.C. (Young, op. cit., p. 225).
Soli (Babelon, P.A., pp. cli and 113; Hill, BMC Cyprus, p. 66, here
has pure Apollo types, a head similar to that on the bronze, and on the
to Tyre in 332. Babelon conjectures they may have been the same
that only Pasicrates of Soli was a king (BMC Cyprus, p. xxv). If, as
the excavation coins seem to show, there was a mint at Curium strik-
ing coins with types suggestive of the diobol shortly before the time
After the battle of Issus and before pursuing Darius to the East,
the free kings of Cyprus. Among them, as we have seen, was Pasi-
crates of Curium whose ships were driven ashore and broken up. If
mint may again have been active, now striking bronzes of Alexander
types. For the cities of Cyprus who came to the aid of Alexander were
opened their gates to him. And those where a mint had previously
existed were allowed to continue striking coins with the proviso that
Citium, Salamis and Paphos have been identified (Newell, NC, 1915,
pp. 294ff.). From the three latter, bronzes as well as silver are known.
The excavation coins suggest that possibly the minor mint at Curium
4.67 gms.)
No. 9, half, Io-I2 mm., wgt. 1.98 gms. (laurel branch not visible)
Only a few of these coins were weighed. The condition of the majority
the die positions, -> or -e-, are also usual for that city. The symbol,
sanctuary of Apollo Hylates. But the fact that twenty-one coins with
the symbol, laurel branch were found in the excavations and only
two with WN, the certain mint mark of Paphos, leads me to attribute
Paphos mint.
Cyprus itself Ptolemy was steadily increasing his power. In 321 B.C.
the kings of Salamis, Paphos, Soli and Amathus were his allies and
receiver of all revenues and, at the same time, install his brother
mastery of Cyprus. His conquest was short lived. In 306 B.C. Deme-
astrous sea battle off Salamis and restored the island to Antigonus.
The latter held it until his death in 301. Demetrius inherited it, but
in 295 B.C. Cyprus was reconquered and again became part of the
Ptolemaic kingdom.
some local dynasts issued coins with their own names and types," the
(ibid. p. cxiii, 76). Nicocles at Paphos (BMC Cyprus, p. lxxix, 7); Eunostus at
Soli (Mrs. Brett Trans. Int. Num. Congress, London, 1936, p. 26 and Newell
AJN, xlvii, p. 69, no. 31); Pumitheon at Citium (BMC Cyprus, pp. 21 f., 75A).
320, continued to strike gold and silver Alexanders (Newell, NC, 1915,
pp. 308f., II-29, and 303, II, 12). If after 320 the autonomy of these
pp. 18f) a new type of small bronze, Macedonian shield with helmet on
the mint similar coins with identical symbol, the caduceus, were
magistrates' initials on both the silver and the bronze shows that at
mint.
my's conquest of the island in 3II and they were supplanted by bronzes
below.
15. Similar.
mint at Salamis in the years c. 316306 B.C. for the same magistrates
mint and dated by Newell to those years (NC, 1915, pp. 309f.).
That the coins were introduced c. 316 B.C. seems reasonable. That
own name in Cyprus (Svoronos, ii, nos. 7482) and, as the Curium
needs of the island. No bronze has been attributed to Cyprus for the
period 306301 B.C. when Antigonus was again in power and before
Demetrius from the years 300295 B.C. (Newell, C. of D. P., p. 24, 17).
were struck over a longer period than those with # Whether the
latter were a reissue after 306 is uncertain and that the shield type
continued down to 3oo is doubtful. The following type, No. 18, now
generally dated from 300295 B.C., may well have been introduced
earlier, within a year or two after the battle of 306 it was designed to
Commemorate.
These coins were attributed by Newell (ibid. p. 25, 20) to the mint
over Ptolemy in 306, Demetrius received the title of King from his
father, Antigonus; but it was not until after the latter's death in 3OI
that the son displayed his own name on the silver coinage and possibly
not until then his portrait (?) on the bronze. One might even question
lifetime.
19. This coin with the preceding types and illegible monogram is
Tarsus (ibid. p. 48, 34 and p. 50, 40), possibly the source of our coin.
and bipennis, Hill (NC, 1926, p. 127) suggested it might date from
the time of Demetrius Poliorcetes for whom the types are appropriate.
small bronzes (Nos. 3740), now of a more general type, the head of
Alexander on the obverse. The latter are included among Sv. IoI-180
for foreign trade, but are attributed by Poole and Mrs. Brett to Cyprus
Cypriote mint before the second Ptolemy came to the throne. The
obscure.
Svoronos (Sv. iv, p. 11), has now been convincingly dated 312305
the coin has the appearance of an official issue and supports Miss
silver.
These coins as well as No. 35 are from Cyprus in the years 3II-306.
correspond to Sv. 76. No. 33, somewhat vague, seems a new variety
with P4 (?). No. 34 should come at the beginning of the series, the
ing both types to Cyprus, not specifying a mint. The Paphian type on
seems to the writer more likely that Ptolemy I used only the mint at
the very earliest being those with the aplustre which Mrs. Brett
and destined for local use. All bear the title BAXIAEQX omitted on
4446. The next lower denomination of this class has head of Alex-
ander in elephant's scalp, the reverse as on Nos. 4143, but with single
47, 48. These, the smallest denomination, resemble Nos. 3739 with
Perhaps for a short time after 295 B.C., Ptolemy contented himself
with striking only small bronze in Cyprus, Nos. 3739. These minor
Cyprus than to ship specie from Egypt. The new mint, or expansion
of the old, would have followed the Egyptian model and possibly
A good criterion for dividing the Cypriote issues, if any, from the
recorded a long series of 28 mm. bronzes all of similar type and style.
These he divided into two groups: one with A as the constant upper
somewhat smaller group with A in the upper place (Sv. 289303). All
the Curium coins of this denomination belong to the second group. The
signatures on all the small Curium pieces for the post-295 B.C. period
(Nos. 3739 and 4446 with X or X, AI, X, Y and H') recur in com-
bination with A (Sv. 303, 291, 3oo, 299 and 293). Of these AI and T'
as well as TI (Sv. 135 and 226) on the small bronze are combined only
and monograms recurring with A are also Cypriote; finally, the coin-
as Alexandria.
When legible, this coin has in the field on the reverse, either a
to Cyprus.
first year of his reign, Svoronos ascribes to him a rich series of dated
In the same year, 266/5, Tyre adopted a new system for dating its
coinage. That mint's output which had been largely bronze before 266,
which the island was no longer in a position to strike (Sv. iv, p. 104).
(Sv. iv, p. 102) was Ptolemy's loss of the battle of Cos to Antigonus
The Curium coins, however, both local and imported pieces, do much
to confirm it. From the reign of no other Ptolemy did the excavations
force Cyprus, possibly the base for mustering the fleet against Gonatas
i, p. 186). The majority of the imports are dated before 266, many
from about that year. The trident countermark, common on the local
authority at the mint, probably the latter. Gonatas chose the trident,
not within the competence of the writer nor within the scope of this
bronze with the Seleucid anchor. Copper, the demotisches Geld as Giesecke
calls it, was handled by the entire populace and a better propaganda medium
than silver.
of the Cyprus mint in c. 265 B.C. was Ptolemy's loss of the battle of Cos"
beyond giving the relevant evidence of the coins and the countermarks.
These coins were struck in Egypt and dated on an era based on the
deification of Arsino, 271/70 B.C. Six of the coins, Nos. 5052, are
from 267/6 and 266/5, the time of the crisis in Cyprus, the other five,
like Nos. 54 and 55, be O, 256/5 B.C. It has not been possible to check
has been verified. Svoronos noted the marks are practically indistin-
guishable.
legs.
ation No. 66, 67, to Cyprus. The dates denote regnal years. X was
That the battle of Cos took place in the Chremonidean War (267261 ?) is
the opinion of Wilamowitz (Gttingische Gelehrte Anzeiger. 176, 1914, p. 87) who
dates it 265-260 B.C., W. Otto (ibid. p. 653) who agrees and E. Bikerman (Revue
des tudes anciennes, 40, 1938, pp. 369ff) proposing the date 263-261. The
coins support this dating rather than the later years of 258 (Tarn, Cambridge
Ancient History, vii, (1928) pp. 862 f.) and 256 B.C. (W. Peremans, Rev. belge,
evidence leads one to believe any forfeiture of the island was brief. Certainly
it must have been returned to Egypt during this reign. In the Adulis inscription
(CIG 5127, Bouch-Leclercq, Histoire des Lagides, vol. i., p. 178, I, Paris, 1903)
Cyprus is listed among the lands inherited by Ptolemy III from his father. The
three, possibly four, Egyptian coins from the year 256/5 found at Curium (Nos.
5456) suggest the island was restored to Egypt shortly after that date, per-
haps in the peace between Ptolemy II and Antigonus of 255 or 253 (dates pro-
des tudes anciennes, 40, 1938, pp. 369f.). It seems much less probable that Cy-
prus remained out of Egyptian hands until 247 B.C. (Sv. iv, p. 102).
Drachms, Yale Un. Press, 1955, p. 18) makes it probable that this too
with A on the silver and suggested (on one example) that it may be
the year T (Sv. ii, p. 86). His argument is not convincing, but that
they come late in the series and possibly from the year T, a compari-
son of Nos. 65 and 59, year A, on PLATE II will show. The latter was
much worn when countermarked, the former fresh, the fine lines of
the feathers plainly visible between the prongs of the trident. The
ing. Coins of this type are recorded for the years TI, P and Y; X and T,
268266 B.C., remain the only years to which a group late in the series
and before 266/5 (year of probable transfer of the mint to Tyre) can
be assigned. Sv. 552 and 553 with A and A are large issues, consistent
(Sv. ii, pp. 83, 86), is that A and A be read as @, the year 265/4.
pushes forward the closing of the Cyprus mint by one year, so that is
the steady production of silver initiated at Tyre in 266/5 B.C. For that
ginning for the series. In the following year 265/4, the output was more
normal and the 264/3 and 262/I issues were large. In these last years,
i. e. from 264 on, it seems quite certain no coins were being struck in
Cyprus. This makes the change from Cyprus to Tyre as the source
Egypt and to the years 285271 B.C., before the deification of Arsino
and before the dated coinage, Nos. 5056 above. Regling (Sv. iv,
whole. Among the coins rejected by him are our Nos. 69, 70 and 71.
He did not suggest they might be Cypriote. But there are reasons
besides the fact that they were found at Curium for so classifying
notably lacking in the smaller 20 mm. size. Rare dated specimens are
known for only three of its twenty years duration, and there are few
undated pieces, Nos. 67, 68. Adding Nos. 6971 to the series makes a
tween them.8
7375. The club as symbol places these coins in Tyre; they are dated
before 266 B.C. The Curium pieces present no new evidence on whether
the letters above the club, TI and X, on Nos. 74, 75 are dates and if so
are to be reckoned on the era of Tyre or as regnal years (see Sv. iv,
pp. 106f. and 467f.). The letter on No. 75 seems, like Svoronos' illus-
76. Also from Tyre, this coin is dated 271246 by Svoronos, but is
7779. Svoronos allotted these undated coins with the symbol cor-
III at an uncertain mint (BMC, p. 54, 84). Finding the coins at Curi-
as Poole proposed. Sv. 362, tetradrachms with EY/X, and Sv. 363, with similar
monograms, probably come from the mint at Paphos; of the latter No. 69 here
and No. 549 from Soli (Westholm, T. of Soli, p. 113) are examples found in
Cyprus. To Paphos also are to be ascribed Sv. 367 and 368, gold and silver
with XT/WN, and related to Sv. 556, 557 (No. 58) with W between the eagle's
legs. To Paphos or Citium the single tetradrachm, Sv. 369, with XT/X. In-
cluded among Regling's rejects are coins with the signature Al. One specimen of
Sv. 381 with ear of wheat and AI has been countermarked with the trident, a
characteristic Cypriote mark of this period as the catalogue shows. This is very
are not rare, yet only five examples turned up at Curium. Even if we
add to these the three coins, 7779, it is difficult to account for the
lon, I. W., RN, 1898, p. 203, nos. 4836/7; BMC Cyprus, p. lxxxi).
Paphian coins of the fourth century (Nos. 2325) and on early coins
Svoronos' surmise (Sv. iv, p. 178) that the coins originated in the
Corinth (Edwards, Corinth, iv, Coins, p. 73), where all of the sixteen
type and quite logically to have been shipped from Cyprus with its
Curium specimens and also the two found at Soli (Westholm, pp. IIo
and II.3, nos. 487, 548) have the double cornucopiae of Sv. II60. On
single cornucopiae, but on none of our pieces can the single be defin-
itely identified. The writer has a coin of this type, with single cornu-
pieces are of two kinds, thick beveled cast flans and those with ver-
tical edges, neatly cut from a cylindrical ingot. The Curium coins are
86. This coin of conventional types, but with K on the obverse, was
Svoronos (Sv. iv, p. 229) to Crete. The latter attribution Regling was
determine the mint. This single example is slight evidence, but sup-
In 203 B.C., after some delay, the death of the dissolute Ptolemy
IV and his queen Arsino III was announced by the king's ministers.
These men then became regents for the infant Ptolemy V and under
A long series of gold and silver from various Cyprus mints was is-
sued under Ptolemy V, apparently filling not only the quota for
Cyprus, but for the lost Phoenician mints as well. With the gold and
silver Svoronos cites only a single bronze piece in his catalogue, but
the following coins may also date from this reign in Cyprus.
pointed out that this attribution was doubtful because they could be
similar coins of Ptolemy VI (our Nos. 95, 96; Sv. I407, I408) referring
type and symbol appear in the reign of Ptolemy VIII, Sv. 16361639.
Nos. 8789 belong to the first of the three groups. They are care-
flans. The head of Zeus is drawn with a sure hand, the hair and beard
not reach the foot. The eagles on the bronze resemble those on
Poole assigns the coins (BMC, p. 70, 28ff.). The lotus on this early
bud.
The X is not clear, but has precisely the form of that shown on
with the name Seleucus Bithys, nauarch and high priest of Cyprus
(Sv. iv, p. 285) finds support in the Curium finds. Svoronos, Regling
and Poole agree that the numerous similar coins with the lotus, but
with EYA between the eagle's legs are from Egypt, under the regency
first in the British Museum (BMC Ptolemies, p. 87, 73) and No. 93 in
Berlin, yet it is these rare varieties that turn up at Curium and none
95, 96. These coins are of the preceding type with lotus in field, but
without letters between the eagle's legs. They are not easily confused
with Nos. 8789, but more nearly resemble No. 107, here listed under
coins of all groups show wear and erosion. Few specimens were on
number assigned to each group of these small coins with lotus can be
only approximate.
99. Head of youthful Dionysus r., bound with ivy, thyrsus over
shoulder.
This coin is very similar to Svoronos' 18oop, Pl. LVI, 8, listed under
Ptomely VIII although dating his reign from 170 B.C. did not
really become king until 146, when he returned from Cyrene and
101105. These coins are of the traditional types with the addition of
106. Similar to the above, but with sceptre held in the eagle's wing,
the coin is undated, as is No. 107. Both are probably from the Paphos
mint.
107. Svoronos lists these coins under both Ptolemy VIII (Sv. 1639)
and Ptolemy X (Sv. 1705). All are here given to Ptolemy VIII.
these bronzes.
In his catalogue, Svoronos listed Nos. Ioff, Io? and IOS under
Egypt, but in his text (Sv.iv, pp. 315f.) placed them in Cyprus and in
the years immediately after 129 B.C., when the dated series (Nos.IoI-
Io5) came to an end. The crested helmet, cap with strings and star
Salamis and Citium, and after the reign of Ptolemy VIII, they are
109. This coin, again of the usual types, is the smallest denomination
Ptolemy VIII left the regency to his widow, Cleopatra III. She pre-
claimed himself king and reckoned his regnal years from that date.
Ptolemy X, Soter II, reckoned his from II6 B.C. when he was called
Soter II to flee from Egypt and seek refuge in Cyprus, while Pto-
Soter II, returning to Egypt, reigned alone until his death in 80 B.C.
listed under No. 114 seem to be without symbol, but it is possible that
above A or T.
years of Ptolemy XI, IIo and 95 B.C. In both years, he said, Pto-
Other coins in the series have H, K, A and M in the field and two eagles;
Io7, IoA, Io9 and Io2 B.C. To Regling, the entire argument, including
the strict interpretation of the meaning of the two eagles, was suspect.
It seems safe to conclude that the coins are Cypriote from this joint
unfamiliar with the rare coins with two eagles, attributed No. II6
The style of the reverse is close to that of No. III (see also Svoro-
nos, iii, Pl. LVIII, 21); and the obverse recalls No. 116 and is related
Four of these coins measure 23/24 mm., one 18 mm.; the last is
they resemble Nos. 116 and 117. The cap has the high, sometimes
conical shape seen on Svoronos' No. 17oo (Pl. LVIII, 17) from the
reign of Ptolemy X and Ptolemy XI. On these grounds, the coins are
after the nineteen-day reign of Ptolemy XII. At the same time, his
had been the king ruling in Cyprus. Now Cyprus and Egypt were
affairs of the island, and the King of Cyprus negotiated directly with
Rome. Whatever the political division may have been, dated Pto-
Svoronos and Regling agreed that Ptolemy XIII, alone, had the
120, 121. These coins of the usual types and crude style, Svoronos
catalogued under Ptolemy XI, but in his text admitted the style
might be later, Regling thought the style certainly later and Poole
listed No. 120 under Ptolemy, King of Cyprus (BMC Ptolemies, p. 120,
and Poole.
5I-30 B.C.
of this reign; her brothers, Ptolemy XIV and XV, and her son Cae-
Ptolemy XIII, in his text (Sv. iv, p. 358) he attributed them to Cleo-
patra in Cyprus.
thin fabric, probably barbarous. Ten or so are the 16 mm. size, with
the usual types of Ammon head and eagle stg. i., and traces of a sym-
bol in the field. The symbol in some cases may be the lotus found on
one or two ears of grain on single stalk; sceptre in l.; star above
p. lxxxi, 2, where they are assigned to the mint of Paphos). They vary
greatly in execution, the finer in high relief are reminiscent of the best
of the small coins of Arsino III, No. 85. At their worst they approach
the barbarous. The flans, though somewhat larger, resemble the cast
There are few gaps in the Ptolemaic series in Cyprus where so large
a group, twenty-one coins, can be fitted in. The most probable seems
then issuing gold and silver almost exclusively and the need for local
with coins of Ptolemy IV, one a context in which nothing earlier than
129. The date of this coin of Augustus from Cyprus with Nike on the
130. This coin from the same reign and Zeus Salaminos as reverse type
131. Hill notes, NC, 1917, p. 24, that these coins with types of Capri-
corn and Scorpion are found in quantity in Cyprus. Grant, op. cit.
Obv.: as above.
issues (NC, 1924, p. 14, Nos. 25, 26) and on the other partially legible
coins from Curium, but the reverse inscription is that used for the
preceding coin.
the reverse that of No. 8 showing Zeus Salaminos and the Paphian
140. Two specimens of these coins of Pius and the young Marcus
Aurelius have been struck over Ptolemaic coins. The flans (32 and
33 mm.) are larger than is usual for the type and have the characte-
p. 205, 447 ff.). Bellinger (Dura vi, p. 156, 1827) probably correctly
Antioch (Waage, Antioch, iv, p. 57,600) weakens the case for Antioch.
ution and struck concurrently with others destined for local use (see
Nos. 179, 180). That the type may not have been struck in Laodicea
with reverse similar to No. 144, is cited by the Swedish Cyprus Ex-
pedition and is the only published example of the type known to me.
potamia (Bellinger, Dura vi, pp. 166ff, 207, H. Seyrig, Les trouvailles
fasc. 34, pp. 249ff.). This single coin is slight, but possible evidence
152. There can be little or no doubt that these coins with the head of
Apollo and lyre are four examples of a common issue from Cyzicus.
legible below KY. These rather surprising finds provoke futile spe-
and Cyzicus?
confronted.
284 f.) and for Verus alone (ibid. p. 147, 291). The magistrate's name
Rev.: COL AVG TROA Apollo stg. l., r. foot on cippus, laurel
branch in r. hand.
Mionnet (ii. p. 648, 132) cites this type for Geta, at Alexandria
Troas, and BMC Troas, p. 24, 121, lists a similar coin for Severus
Alexander.
on which he leans with 1. hand, feeding snake with r., staff in lap.
feet.
laur.
for Philip I.
TPGB TA/\/\ON CGB and AYT KPA KAI TAI TPG TA/\/\ON CG
(Mionnet iii, p. 571, 167, 168). Both, like this coin, omitting
p. 42, 7).
170. The flan of this coin of Alexander Bala and Cleopatra with cornu-
copiae on the reverse is too small for the type, AEEANA spans its
width.
The 123 examples found at Antioch (Waage, Antioch, iv, pp. 55f.,
588-590) and the 34, plus seven, similar varieties from Dura (Dura,
vi, pp. 78f., 16911695) confirm the attribution. Cyprus adds its
cene. The same minutiae of design appear on both. Only a single va-
and elsewhere and later the local mint may have produced bronzes
This is similar to a coin in the BMC, except that the name there is
190. Head of Tyche r., veiled and turreted; palm over 1, shoulder.
rium, are of the same date, a date known heretofore only on a single
similar pieces, BMC 309-312 (op. cit., 262), reads AA and AA.
from quiver with r., holding bow in l.; Mannas, nude l.; between
them, h.
and Lucilla (BMC Palestine, p. 158, 1oo, Pl. XVI, 6) with the same
here visible.
208. The general appearance of this unidentified coin with its cast,
beveled flan is Seleucid. The head has more the character of a portrait
than of an Apollo. The reverse is so eroded that the type may be some-
The flan of this coin is thin and flat, the types in low relief. There is
suggest coins of Masicytes and Myra in Lycia in the first century B.C.
ROMAN COINS
p. II.5, 708ff.) and dated before 27 B.C. Michael Grant discusses both
Main Six Aes Coinages of Augustus, pp. 113 ff. In the latter he argues
for a later date then Mattingly's, proposing for both Nos. 210 and 2II
wide distribution. The two issues here belong to the latter group.
vincial issues, struck by the Roman authorities for the use of a pro-
vince (see Nos. 129135) and the local issues of cities and tribes. In
Syria (see Nos. 173, 174 listed under Antioch). But in both cases
there was, beyond any doubt, a branch issue, with similar type, made
head of Domitian r.
and Claudius, of these the first is the most likely. (See BMC, i, pp.
* Unfortunately Grant's monograph was not published until after the Curium
coins had been returned to Cyprus. No. 21o may be Cypriote. Of No. 211
there is less doubt. These four coins from Curium support Grant's theory
that a branch issue of the C.A type was struck at a mint in Cyprus.
fronted.
with confronted busts on the obverse and the two emperors' names.
The one is dated in 178 (TR PXXXII), the other has no inscription
on the reverse, but since the type is the same on both, Mars r. with
(C. 524) and an aureus and denarius of Plautilla (C. 21, 22) where the
similar obverse.
but more in keeping with the other medallions with two busts, pro-
There are holes in the edge of the medallion, both top and bottom,
which were undoubtedly used for some kind of setting, perhaps the
tripod holding fiale, behind him youth playing pipe and a man
over 1. forearm.
none on the reverse where it may never have been applied. The me-
338. On this coin S is on the left and star on the right, an arrangement
357. Maurice gives this type for Crispus with a similar portrait, small
Although too battered to warrant a cast the type and mint are cer-
tain.
434. These coins are from two series: TeST and SMTS.A.
has been followed. The most recent work on these coins was published
after the Curium catalogue was written and is not there referred to.
tine cover the period from 337 A.D. to the introduction of the large
AE Fel Temp Reparatio type which they date to 346 rather than
8*
536. This coin must be a hybrid. The type belongs to Arcadius and
sius.
550. This type is listed by Pearce only for Honorius, but a specimen
for Arcadius was also found at Antioch (Antioch, iv, pt. 2, p. 142,
no. 1929).
553. Of the emperors striking this type, Arcadius alone has the shield
566. The inscription on this coin, largely illegible, begins DNA and
573. Both in Sabatier and Tolstoi (Vol. 1, p. 51, 153) the mintmark on
Dr. Kent of the British Museum assures me that our coin is typical of
unknown. Since the vertical line at left is clear it can perhaps be ex-
619, 620. The monograms vary in detail. The majority, including the
three with star, No. 620, have no horizontal stroke at the base of the
621. The monogram here is high and narrow with a large S, probably
623. On these coins the obverse reads DN LEO MVL, and the same
625. These coins have a similar obverse to No. 624. On some of them
verse. Tolstoirestores an Lin the left field. It has also been conjectured
that the letter on the left is a b, the letters and type interpreted as
628. The obverses here are illegible, but Mrs. Waage read DN LEO F
AVG on a similar coin found at Antioch (Antioch, iv, p. 146, Type 1).
630. The obverse here is clear: D N LEO PEP PET AVG. The coin
PFATVG making it clear that the name ends in N not O. On the re-
verse below the wreath are marks suggestive of the mintmark on the
632. This carefully cut monogram differs from that on the Constanti-
his reign are from his joint reign with Marcus and those with Verina
(Milne, NC, 1926, p. 88). He struck gold and silver both as sole ruler
(Tolstoi, i, pp. 163 ff.) and jointly with Marcus (ibid., pp. 165f.) Possi-
bly small bronzes formed part of both issues. The monogram here
Fully nine-tenths of the coins under this heading come from ex-
* Dr. J. P. C. Kent of the British Museum read the monogram for me. To
him I am also indebted for the information that mintmarks are not found on
Byzantine coins found in tracing its course, its construction was prob-
ably nearly completed in the time of Justinian I." The finds include
694), one each for Maurice and Phocas, then several from the reigns
of Heraclius and Constans II. Practically all of the coins for the first
addition to the Byzantine coins the water system yielded over 400
16 plain lead discs (7, 8 mm.); many worn late Roman coins their imi-
tations and casts from molds worn almost smooth; also some ancient
bronze, coins of the Ptolemies and the Jews. From their distribution
it seems that these unrelated coins and bits of metal all circulated to-
Egypt (The Currency of Egypt in the Fifth Century, NC, 1926, p. 62)
perhaps hold true for Cyprus also in the early sixth century: that
any piece of metal would serve for the purpose of a unit virtually
Certainly the Vandal and Ostrogothic pieces come from the West
and probably Nos. 640, 644648 and others as well. The majority,
nean imitations current in the fifth and sixth centuries and attrib-
coins of small module, 8Io mm., differentiating them from the thin-
ner, generally larger, typical late Roman coins and their imitations.
true Vandal coins. It is also misleading, the fabric of the official mini-
Procopius, de aed., 5, 9. It is generally assumed ... that this was the aqueduct
that the aqueduct is the irrigation system of which there are remains at
lish coins (cf. BMC, Pl. III, 1315), here PLATE IX, the others of a
636. This type, not listed among the Vandals in the BMC, may not
have been current in Italy and North Africa, but Milne cites it (op.
637. The smallest of these coins is of typical Vandal fabric, the largest
647. Some of these coins with cross potent in wreath are like the coins
wreath have been listed as imperial, those with linear or dotted border
ral criterion this does not hold. The wreath is found on many imita-
650. The obverse of this coin is barbarous, the reverse with wreath,
good.
I40 (or Anastasius, Tolstoi, Pl. I4, 69), but there is no trace of the S
ranean imitation.
d'Italie (Aix, 1843). Lazoy's work, not easily accessible, has not been
monogram.
whether the bust is facing or in profile. However, the lion r, with star
BYZANTINE COINS
media.
678. In fabric and poor workmanship this coin resembles the barbar-
ous minimi with monogram and should perhaps be classed with them
of minimi came to an end with the currency reform of 498 A.D. The
output limited to the first seven years of his reign. The popularity of
684. Few of these coins with cross at r., described in NC, 1926, p.
388, as well as by Tolstoi, p. 52, 3740, are clearly legible; the majo-
my attention.
single imitation of the type, No. 663, also seems to read IVSTINIANVS.
Carthage mint.
that the three coins of this type are the only coins of Justin II from
the water-system (for other coins from water-system see p. 118), and,
with the exception of a coin of Maurice, year 685/6, and one for
Phocas, are the only coins from that complex that can be dated between
695. The mintmark on this coin looks like CON, but there seems to be
must be he. Justinian has no coins dated ANNO until his 13th year.
dated his coins from his appointment as Caesar in 574 A.D., but it is
rates the emperor's crown. Coins from later years of this reign also
with blundered legends (see PLATE X, 704) have the same trefoil
from those of Tiberius at that mint. On the latter the crown is sur-
mounted by a cross.
711. Ten of these coins are overstrikes. Three coins of Maurice Tibe-
rius and one earlier type of Heraclius with two figures were identified
as undertypes.
714. Wroth notes that coins of the A denomination are scarce. None
was found in the Athenian agora and but one at Antioch. Both Curium
715. Of these coins, the one for the year 1o is an overstrike on a coin
of Phocas.
716. There is little doubt that this coin with three standing figures is
Cypriote, the type and a similar date are known. It is not, however,
weight is less than 2.4 gms. The letters KYTIP in the exergue are retro-
been twice sacked and seems an unsuitable place for a mint; although
the Soli hoard (Westholm, op. cit.) spans a period from about year 8
There is no evidence that Constans II ever struck any coins with three
figures, he appears with one son or with three. The three figure type
the year 16. The date of the Heraclius die has left no impression.
721. All but two of these coins are overstrikes, three are on coins of
No. 721 from the year 3 seems to have enjoyed a more strictly local
currency than any other. Nothing in the character of the coin however
shipped almost in its entirety to Cyprus. Nine coins of this variety were
255 ff.) There among 89 coins from the first seven years of this reign,
found, only one example of the type is listed; at Antioch there were
variety turned up in the Soli hoard (Westholm, op. cit.), that hoard
BMC Byzantine Coins, shows that all coins from the Cyprus Find
(see Warren, NC, 1861) are so stamped, but that those from other
sources are not. All but one of the coins in the Soli hoard bore this
After its sack and destruction by the Arabs in 647/649 A.D., Con-
stantia seems an improbable site for a mint. Still a sort of local coin-
age could have been created by importing specie from a large mint,
centuries.) The many coins showing little wear (notably in the Warren
may simply show that specie was imported directly from an outside
mint and countermarked before being put into circulation. Coins al-
antedate (and may have been lost before) the adoption of a counter-
marking scheme. This scheme was initiated after the sack of 647 or
649, possibly as early as 651 A.D. or possibly not until after the second
its latest coin dated 648/9, would seem to support the latter sugges-
tion for Mr. Dikigoropoulos, judging by the wear, thinks the hoard
was in circulation after 649 A.D. The most telling argument against
Cyprus as a mint for coins of Constans II after 649 is the large number
of all his types found both in the Athenian agora and at Antioch,
robe and jewelled mantle falling from l. arm. In his r., long cross,
This type is similar to type I of Manuel, cf. BMC Byz., p. 577. The
732. CAA. . . AeC. . . Emperor holding cross and globus cr. being
col. 512. The types on the Curium coin are less worn than any of the
published pieces.
of this type or part of the earlier one. The style of the obverse dates
this toward the end of the long line of coins bearing denominations
MEDIEVAL COINS
735. One of these coins has pellets in the four quarters of the cross.
two dots behind the lion's tail; on another there is no crosslet in the
reverse field.
744. This variety, not listed by Schlumberger, has stars in the four
1847, p. III explain the prevalence and poor quality of these coins by
qui estoient aux baigns publics et fit battre d'iceux plusieurs sortes de
monnoye.
753. These coins were struck in Venice for trade in the Levant and are
ERRATA ON PLATES
PLATES
Awn
TOT y
15
18
23
24
27
28
II
fift
oft |
*.
* --
|-
".
139
144
164
VIII