Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Neuropharmacology
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/neuropharm
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 17 November 2011
Received in revised form
23 January 2012
Accepted 12 February 2012
Amblyopia is one of the most common forms of visual impairment, arising from an early functional
imbalance between the two eyes. It is currently accepted that, due to a lack of neural plasticity,
amblyopia is an untreatable pathology in adults. Environmental enrichment (EE) emerged as a strategy
highly effective in restoring plasticity in adult animals, eliciting recovery from amblyopia through
a reduction of intracortical inhibition. It is unknown whether single EE components are able to promote
plasticity in the adult brain, crucial information for designing new protocols of environmental stimulation suitable for amblyopic human subjects. Here, we assessed the effects of enhanced physical exercise, increased social interaction, visual enrichment or perceptual learning on visual function recovery in
adult amblyopic rats. We report a complete rescue of both visual acuity and ocular dominance in
exercised rats, in animals exposed to visual enrichment and in animals engaged in perceptual learning.
These effects were accompanied by a reduced inhibition/excitation balance in the visual cortex. In
contrast, we did not detect any sign of recovery in socially enriched rats or in animals practicing a purely
associative visual task. These ndings could have a bearing in orienting clinical research in the eld of
amblyopia therapy.
2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Amblyopia
Environmental stimulation
GABAergic inhibition
Perceptual learning
Plasticity
1. Introduction
Amblyopia is the most common impairment of visual function
affecting one eye in adults, with a prevalence of about 1e5% of the
total world population (Holmes and Clarke, 2002). This pathology is
caused by early abnormal visual experience with a functional
imbalance between the two eyes owing to anisometropia, strabismus or congenital cataract, resulting in a dramatic loss of visual
acuity in an apparently healthy eye and a broad range of other
perceptual abnormalities, including decits in contrast sensitivity
and in stereopsis (Lewis and Maurer, 2005; Levi, 2006). In animal
models, amblyopia can be articially caused by imposing a longterm reduction of inputs from one eye by lid suture (monocular
2389
2390
Fig. 1. Impact of motor, social and visual stimulation on visual acuity restoration in adult amblyopic animals. (A) Electrophysiological assessment (by VEPs) revealed that the visual
acuity of the formerly deprived eye was not statistically different with respect to that of the fellow eye in rats exposed to classic enrichment under normal light conditions (EE:
paired t-test, p 0.442), motor enrichment (ME: paired t-test, p 0.926), visual stimulation (VE: Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test, p 0.938) and visual perceptual learning (PL: paired ttest, p 0.06). In contrast, no recovery of visual acuity was observed in standard condition (SC: paired t-test, p < 0.01), social stimulation (SS: paired t-test, p < 0.001) and classic
enrichment combined with dark-rearing animals (DR-EE: paired t-test, p < 0.01). (B) KruskaleWallis One-Way ANOVA on ranks revealed a statistical difference in the mean values
of visual acuity for the long-term deprived eye among the various groups (p < 0.001); a multiple comparison procedure (Dunns Method) showed that visual acuity was not
signicantly different from that recorded in adult animals in EE, ME, VE and PL rats, but not in SC, SS and DR-EE animals. The gray box denotes the visual acuity range in nave adult
animals. Representative examples of electrophysiological visual acuity assessment for an amblyopic and a normal eye are reported on the right in the (B) panel: visual acuity is
obtained by extrapolation to zero amplitude of the linear regression through the data points in a curve where VEP amplitude is plotted against log spatial frequency. * p < 0.05; error
bars, s.e.m.
2391
Fig. 2. Impact of motor, social and visual stimulation on ocular dominance restoration in adult amblyopic animals. The graph shows the contralateral to ipsilateral eye (C/I) VEP ratio
mean values for all different groups. The gray box denotes the C/I VEP ratio range in nave adult animals. One-Way ANOVA revealed a statistical difference in the mean values among
the various groups (p < 0.001); a multiple comparison procedure (HolmeSidak method) showed that ocular dominance recovered to normal adult values in EE, ME, VE and PL
animals (p 0.829, 0.315, 0.105, 0.863, respectively), but not in SC, SS and DR-EE rats (p < 0.05). Typical VEPs recorded in response to the stimulation of either the contralateral or
the ipsilateral eye in amblyopic and normal animals are reported in the top inset. Calibration bars: 25 mV, 100 ms. * p < 0.05; error bars, s.e.m.
for data not normally distributed. The progressive reduction in the minimum
discriminable SF difference between the reference and the test grating across the
days of PL procedure was evaluated with a One-Way RM ANOVA. Behavioral visual
acuity measured through the amblyopic eye of PL rats immediately after RS, at the
end of the PL procedure and after a period of 15 further days was compared with
a One-Way RM ANOVA. Level of signicance was p < 0.05.
Fig. 3. Perceptual learning in adult amblyopic rats. (A) Schematic diagram of the
modied version of the visual water box used for perceptual learning (PL) in amblyopic
rats. (B) Improvement of discrimination threshold in adult amblyopic rats performing
the PL task. The threshold, calculated as the minimum spatial frequency difference
between the reference and the test gratings discriminated (MDSFD), decreased
signicantly with the training days (One-Way RM ANOVA, p < 0.001). The MDSFD
obtained in the sixth day of the PL task was statistically different from that obtained in
the rst day (HolmeSidak method, p < 0.01). Examples of the discriminative difference
between the reference and the test grating across the training days are also represented. Error bars, s.e.m.
3. Results
3.1. Physical activity induces amblyopia recovery in adult rats
We rst investigated whether enhanced levels of physical
exercise are able to promote recovery from amblyopia. A group of
rats rendered amblyopic by monocular deprivation (MD) carried
out at the peak of the critical period (postnatal day 21, P21) were
subjected to reverse suture (RS) in adulthood (>P60) and then
either transferred, for three weeks, in standard cages endowed
with a running wheel connected to an automatic wheel turn
recording device (n 5), or left in standard cages for control (n 6).
At the end of the differential rearing period, we measured VA of
both eyes using electrophysiological recordings of visual evoked
potentials (VEPs) from the binocular portion of the primary visual
cortex (V1). Visual acuity of animals subjected to motor enrichment
(ME rats) was completely restored, while that of animals left in
standard cage (SC rats) did not recover (Fig. 1A). Visual acuity
through the amblyopic eye for the ME group (1.02 0.08 cycles per
degree, c/deg) was not statistically different either from that of the
not deprived eye (1.03 0.10 c/deg; paired t-test, p 0.926; Fig. 1A)
or from that recorded in adult nave animals (never deprived)
(n 12, 0.92 0.02 c/deg; KruskaleWallis One-Way ANOVA on
Ranks, post hoc Dunns Method; Fig. 1B). On the contrary, VA for the
deprived eye in SC animals (0.62 0.05 c/deg) remained signicantly lower than that for the fellow undeprived eye (1.04 0.03,
paired t-test, t 6.421 with 5 degrees of freedom, p < 0.01;
Fig. 1A) and that in normal adult animals (KruskaleWallis One-Way
ANOVA on Ranks, H 38.265 with 7 degrees of freedom, p < 0.001;
post hoc Dunns Method, Q 3.571; Fig. 1B).
In the same animals, we also evaluated the ocular dominance
(OD) by calculating the contralateral to ipsilateral (C/I) VEP ratio. C/I
2392
2393
Fig. 5. Visual acuity recovery in PL rats is dependent on visual training. The histogram
shows behavioral visual acuity of both eyes measured in animals subjected to PL, in
associative learning rats (AL) and in animals trained only in the rst step of PL training
(1st step PL). Visual acuity of the previously deprived eye was different from that of the
other eye in AL and 1st step PL animals (p < 0.001), but not in the PL group (p 0.750)
(Two-Way RM ANOVA, HolmeSidak method). * p < 0.05; error bars, s.e.m.
2394
Fig. 7. Excitation-inhibition balance regulates plasticity in adult amblyopic rats. (A) Depolarization-evoked release of (3H)D-Asp from synaptosomes. 15 mM KCl evoked (3H)D-Asp
release from visual cortex synaptosomes of the various groups. One-Way ANOVA did not show a signicant difference among the group levels (p 0.232). (B) Depolarization-evoked
release of (3H)GABA from synaptosomes. 25 mM KCl evoked GABA release from visual cortex synaptosomes. One-Way ANOVA showed a signicant difference among the group
levels (p < 0.001); a multiple comparison procedure (HolmeSidak method) showed that levels of GABA were signicantly lower with respect to SC animals in EE, ME, DR-EE, VE and
PL animals (p < 0.05), while no statistical difference was present between SC animals and SS rats (p 0.06). * p < 0.05; error bars, s.e.m.
Fig. 8. Amblyopia recovery in enriched animals depends on the use of the impaired
eye. (A) Electrophysiological assessment revealed that the visual acuity of the formerly
deprived eye remained lower with respect to that of the other eye in rats exposed to
three weeks of EE without reopening of their long-term deprived eye (noRS-EE rats)
(paired t-test, p < 0.001). Moreover, in noRS-EE rats the visual acuity of the long-term
deprived eye was lower than that recorded in nave adult animals (t-test, p < 0.001).
The gray box denotes the visual acuity range in adult normal animals. For comparison,
data of visual acuity in long-term deprived rats exposed to either standard condition or
EE are also reported. (B) Contralateral to ipsilateral eye (C/I) VEP ratio mean values in
SC, EE and noRS-EE animals. One-Way ANOVA showed a statistical difference in the
mean values among the three groups (p < 0.05); a multiple comparison procedure
(HolmeSidak method) showed that ocular dominance was recovered to normal adult
values in EE animals (p 0.847), but not in SC and noRS-EE rats (p < 0.05). The gray
box denotes the C/I VEP ratio range in adult normal animals. * p < 0.05; error
bars, s.e.m.
noRS-EE animals the C/I VEP ratio (1.17 0.08) was signicantly
lower than that of adult nave rats (One-Way ANOVA, F 7.779
with 3 degrees of freedom, p < 0.01; HolmeSidak method,
t 2.929; Fig. 8B).
These results indicate that different environmental stimulation
procedures are able to reopen visual cortex plasticity through
a reduction of GABAergic inhibition levels and that this reduction is
effective in inducing visual function recovery in adult amblyopic
rats only if the animals have the opportunity to use their long-term
deprived eye.
4. Discussion
4.1. Effects elicited by motor, social and visual stimulation on
amblyopia recovery
It is widely held that the positive effects elicited by EE are due to
the combination of the various stimulating factors (motor, social,
sensory) included in this protocol. However, very few studies have
specically examined the contribution given by each EE component
in inducing plasticity in the adult brain. This analysis could be very
2395
helpful not only in a basic research perspective, but also for the
elaboration of novel protocols of environmental stimulations suitable to be applied to human patients. Here, we demonstrated that
procedures aimed at the potentiation of single components typically present in EE are able to reproduce the effect of recovery of
visual functions from amblyopia previously reported in classicallyenriched animals (Sale et al., 2007).
We rst focused our analysis on the characterization of the
effects elicited by a protocol aimed at stimulating voluntary physical activity, placing the animals in cages where they had free access
to a running wheel. Exercised rats fully recovered visual functions
both at level of VA and OD. The strong activation of the primary
motor cortex induced in ME animals by physical activity may
eventually result in the activation of cross-modal plasticity in V1.
Accordingly, it has been shown that the visually evoked ring rate
of V1 neurons is strongly enhanced, in awake mice, when the
animals transit from standing still to running (Niell and Stryker,
2010). In addition, the positive effects elicited by exercise on V1
plasticity might depend on the up-regulation of peripheral or
central growth factors and their relative intracellular cascades,
which may drive structural and functional changes in V1 circuitry.
For example, it is well known that IGF-1 levels increase both at
peripheral level (Schwarz et al., 1996) and in the brain (Carro et al.,
2000) in exercised rats.
In contrast, social enrichment per se was not able to induce
restoration of normal VA and OD in adult amblyopic rats. It has to
be underlined that, to analyze this component, we employed
a protocol in which two variables were changed compared to the
SC, i.e. rat number and cage size. Even if this rendered hard to
estimate the specic effects deriving from the social variable alone,
we point out that we used the protocol originally adopted in
literature for reproducing social enrichment (Rosenzweig et al.,
1978). Moreover, as the social stimulation group did not differ
from the controls, we consider unlikely an effect deriving from the
larger size cage. In agreement with our results, a recent study
pointed out a weak contribution of social stimulation on brain
plasticity, demonstrating that while the number of newly generated hippocampal neurons is increased in animals subjected to
enhanced social interactions, this augment is not reected by
positive effects on learning and memory abilities (Madroal et al.,
2010).
The animals exposed to the protocol of visual enrichment
showed a marked recovery from amblyopia. The apparatus that we
used for visual stimulation was specically designed to maximize
stimulation of V1 cortical neurons, which are particularly sensitive
to gratings of different spatial frequencies and to the orientation of
the stimuli (Maffei et al., 1977). This visual enrichment protocol was
not a passive stimulation paradigm, since the animals could choose
when and how much to watch the visual stimuli. We also
demonstrated that adult amblyopic animals placed under classic EE
conditions, but completely deprived from visual stimulation, failed
to recover normal visual functions. Quinlan and colleagues (He
et al., 2007) recently demonstrated that the loss of VA resulting
from chronic MD is reversible in animals reared in darkness in
adulthood. In this previous report, however, light deprivation
preceded the reopening of the deprived eye, which coincided with
the animals being returned to normal light conditions. Conversely,
in our experimental paradigm the animals were reverse-sutured
and placed in dark-rearing (and in EE) at the same moment.
In agreement with evidence on human subjects (for recent
reviews, see Levi and Li, 2009; Astle et al., 2011), a marked recovery
of visual functions was evident in amblyopic rats subjected to visual
PL. Electrophysiological and behavioral data concordantly documented a full recovery of VA in PL rats. The recovery outlasted the
end of the treatment, as is the case for EE (Sale et al., 2007),
2396
5. Conclusions
Conict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conicts of interest.
Acknowledgments
Work supported by the grant Progetto di Ateneo 2008 to AS
and a Scuola Normale Superiore grant to LM and LB.
References
Astle, A.T., McGraw, P.V., Webb, B.S., 2011. Can human amblyopia be treated in
adulthood? Strabismus 19, 99e109.
Baroncelli, L., Sale, A., Viegi, A., Maya Vetencourt, J.F., De Pasquale, R., Baldini, S.,
Maffei, L., 2010a. Experience-dependent reactivation of ocular dominance
plasticity in the adult visual cortex. Exp. Neurol. 226, 100e109.
Baroncelli, L., Braschi, C., Spolidoro, M., Begenisic, T., Sale, A., Maffei, L., 2010b.
Nurturing brain plasticity: impact of environmental enrichment. Cell Death
Differ. 17, 1092e1103.
Baroncelli, L., Maffei, L., Sale, A., 2011. New perspectives in amblyopia therapy on
adults: a critical role for the excitatory/inhibitory balance. Front. Cell. Neurosci.
5, 25e30.
Bavelier, D., Levi, D.M., Li, R.W., Dan, Y., Hensch, T.K., 2010. Removing brakes on
adult brain plasticity: from molecular to behavioral interventions. J. Neurosci.
30, 14964e14971.
Begenisic, T., Spolidoro, M., Braschi, C., Baroncelli, L., Milanese, M., Pietra, G.,
Fabbri, M.E., Bonanno, G., Cioni, G., Maffei, L., Sale, A., 2011. Environmental
enrichment decreases GABAergic inhibition and improves cognitive abilities,
synaptic plasticity, and visual functions in a mouse model of Down syndrome.
Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2011 (5), 29.
Carro, E., Nuez, A., Busiguina, S., Torres-Aleman, I., 2000. Circulating insulin-like
growth factor I mediates effects of exercise on the brain. J. Neurosci. 20,
2926e2933.
Cooke, S.F., Bear, M.F., 2010. Visual experience induces long-term potentiation in the
primary visual cortex. J. Neurosci. 30, 16304e16313.
Fernandez, F., Garner, C.C., 2007. Over-inhibition: a model for developmental
intellectual disability. Trends Neurosci. 30, 497e503.
Fischer, A., Sananbenesi, F., Wang, X., Dobbin, M., Tsai, L.H., 2007. Recovery of
learning and memory is associated with chromatin remodelling. Nature 447,
178e182.
Gu, Q., 2002. Neuromodulatory transmitter systems in the cortex and their role in
cortical plasticity. Neuroscience 111, 815e835.
Harauzov, A., Spolidoro, M., DiCristo, G., De Pasquale, R., Cancedda, L., Pizzorusso, T.,
Viegi, A., Berardi, N., Maffei, L., 2010. Reducing intracortical inhibition in the
adult visual cortex promotes ocular dominance plasticity. J. Neurosci. 30,
361e371.
Harwerth, R.S., Smith 3rd, E.L., Boltz, R.L., Crawford, M.L., von Noorden, G.K., 1983.
Behavioral studies on the effect of abnormal early visual experience in
monkeys: spatial modulation sensitivity. Vision Res. 23, 1501e1510.
He, H.Y., Ray, B., Dennis, K., Quinlan, E.M., 2007. Experience-dependent recovery of
vision following chronic deprivation amblyopia. Nat. Neurosci. 10, 1134e1136.
Holmes, J.M., Clarke, M.P., 2002. Amblyopia. Lancet 367, 1343e1351.
Ickes, B.R., Pham, T.M., Sanders, L.A., Albeck, D.S., Mohammed, A.H., Granholm, A.C.,
2000. Long-term environmental enrichment leads to regional increases in
neurotrophin levels in rat brain. Exp. Neurol. 164, 45e52.
Kaneko, M., Hanover, J.L., England, P.M., Stryker, M.P., 2008. TrkB kinase is required
for recovery, but not loss, of cortical responses following monocular deprivation. Nat. Neurosci. 11, 497e504.
Kasamatsu, T., 1982. Enhancement of neuronal plasticity by activating the norepinephrine system in the brain: a remedy for amblyopia. Hum. Neurobiol. 1,
49e54.
Kiorpes, L., Kiper, D.C., OKeefe, L.P., Cavanaugh, J.R., Movshon, J.A., 1998. Neuronal
correlates of amblyopia in the visual cortex of macaque monkeys with experimental strabismus and anisometropia. J. Neurosci. 18, 6411e6424.
Levi, D.M., 2006. Visual processing in amblyopia: human studies. Strabismus 14,11e19.
Levi, D.M., Li, R.W., 2009. Improving the performance of the amblyopic visual
system. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 364, 399e407.
Levi, D.M., Hariharan, S., Klein, S.A., 2002. Suppressive and facilitatory spatial
interactions in amblyopic vision. Vision Res. 42, 1379e1394.
Lewis, T.L., Maurer, D., 2005. Multiple sensitive periods in human visual development: evidence from visually deprived children. Dev. Psychobiol. 46, 163e183.
Li, R.W., Ngo, C., Nguyen, J., Levi, D.M., 2011. Video-game play induces plasticity in
the visual system of adults with amblyopia. PLoS Biol. 9, e1001135.
Madroal, N., Lpez-Aracil, C., Rangel, A., del Ro, J.A., Delgado-Garca, J.M.,
Gruart, A., 2010. Effects of enriched physical and social environments on motor
performance, associative learning, and hippocampal neurogenesis in mice. PLoS
One 5, 11130e11140.
2397
Maffei, L., Morrone, C., Pirchio, M., Sandini, G., 1977. Visual cortical cells as spatial
frequency analysers [proceedings]. J. Physiol. 272, 89Pe90P.
Maurer, D., Lewis, T.L., Brent, H.P., Levin, A.V., 1999. Rapid improvement in the acuity
of infants after visual input. Science 286, 108e110.
Maya Vetencourt, J.F., Sale, A., Viegi, A., Baroncelli, L., De Pasquale, R., OLeary, O.F.,
Castrn, E., Maffei, L., 2008. The antidepressant uoxetine restores plasticity in
the adult visual cortex. Science 320, 385e388.
Mitchell, D.E., Ruck, M., Kaye, M.G., Kirby, S., 1984. Immediate and long-term effects
on visual acuity of surgically induced strabismus in kittens. Exp. Brain Res. 55,
420e430.
Morishita, H., Hensch, T.K., 2008. Critical period revisited: impact on vision. Curr.
Opin. Neurobiol. 18, 101e107.
Morishita, H., Miwa, J.M., Heintz, N., Hensch, T.K., 2010. Lynx1, a cholinergic brake,
limits plasticity in adult visual cortex. Science 330, 1238e1240.
Niell, C.M., Stryker, M.P., 2010. Modulation of visual responses by behavioral state in
mouse visual cortex. Neuron 65, 472e479.
Nithianantharajah, J., Hannan, A.J., 2006. Enriched environments, experiencedependent plasticity and disorders of the nervous system. Nat. Rev. Neurosci.
7, 697e709.
Pizzorusso, T., Medini, P., Landi, S., Baldini, S., Berardi, N., Maffei, L., 2006. Structural
and functional recovery from early monocular deprivation in adult rats. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103, 8517e8522.
Polat, U., 1999. Functional architecture of long-range perceptual interactions. Spat.
Vis. 12, 143e162.
Porciatti, V., Pizzorusso, T., Maffei, L., 1999. The visual physiology of the wild type
mouse determined with pattern VEPs. Vision Res. 39, 3071e3081.
Prusky, G.T., West, P.W., Douglas, R.M., 2000a. Experience-dependent plasticity of
visual acuity in rats. Eur. J. Neurosci. 12, 3781e3786.
Prusky, G.T., West, P.W., Douglas, R.M., 2000b. Behavioral assessment of visual
acuity in mice and rats. Vision Res. 40, 2201e2209.
Putignano, E., Lonetti, G., Cancedda, L., Ratto, G., Costa, M., Maffei, L., Pizzorusso, T.,
2007. Developmental downregulation of histone posttranslational modications regulates visual cortical plasticity. Neuron 53, 747e759.
Reiteri, M., Bonanno, G., Marchi, M., Maura, G., 1984. Is there a functional linkage
between neurotransmitter uptake mechanisms and presynaptic receptors?
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 231, 671e677.
Rosenzweig, M.R., Bennett, E.L., Hebert, M., Morimoto, H., 1978. Social grouping
cannot account for cerebral effects of enriched environments. Brain Res. 153,
563e576.
Sale, A., Maya Vetencourt, J.F., Medini, P., Cenni, M.C., Baroncelli, L., De Pasquale, R.,
Maffei, L., 2007. Environmental enrichment in adulthood promotes amblyopia
recovery through a reduction of intracortical inhibition. Nat. Neurosci. 10,
679e681.
Sale, A., Berardi, N., Maffei, L., 2009. Enrich the environment to empower the brain.
Trends Neurosci. 32, 233e239.
Sale, A., Berardi, N., Spolidoro, M., Baroncelli, L., Maffei, L., 2010. GABAergic inhibition in visual cortical plasticity. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 4, 10e15.
Sale, A., De Pasquale, R., Bonaccorsi, J., Pietra, G., Olivieri, D., Berardi, N., Maffei, L.,
2011. Visual perceptual learning induces long-term potentiation in the visual
cortex. Neuroscience 172, 219e225.
Schwarz, A.J., Brasel, J.A., Hintz, R.L., Mohan, S., Cooper, D.M., 1996. Acute effect of
brief low- and high-intensity exercise on circulating insulin-like growth factor
(IGF) I, II, and IGF-binding protein-3 and its proteolysis in young healthy men.
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 81, 3492e3497.
Silingardi, D., Scali, M., Belluomini, G., Pizzorusso, T., 2010. Epigenetic treatments of
adult rats promote recovery from visual acuity decits induced by long-term
monocular deprivation. Eur. J. Neurosci. 31, 2185e2192.
Singer, W., von Grnau, M., Rauschecker, J., 1980. Functional amblyopia in kittens
with unilateral exotropia. I. Electrophysiological assessment. Exp. Brain Res. 40,
294e304.
Smith, D.C., 1981. Functional restoration of vision in the cat after long-term
monocular deprivation. Science 213, 1137e1139.
Spolidoro, M., Baroncelli, L., Putignano, E., Maya Vetencourt, J.F., Viegi, A., Maffei, L.,
2011. Food restriction enhances visual cortex plasticity in adulthood. Nat.
Commun. 2, 320e327.
Stigliani, S., Zappettino, S., Reiteri, L., Passalacqua, M., Melloni, E., Venturi, C.,
Tacchetti, C., Diaspro, A., Usai, C., Bonanno, G., 2006. Glia re-sealed particles
freshly prepared from adult rat brain are competent for exocytotic release of
glutamate. J. Neurochem. 96, 656e668.
Thompson, B., Mansouri, B., Koski, L., Hess, R.F., 2008. Brain plasticity in the adult:
modulation of function in amblyopia with rTMS. Curr. Biol. 18, 1067e1071.
Timney, B., 1983. The effects of early and late monocular deprivation on binocular
depth perception in cats. Brain Res. 283, 235e243.
van Praag, H., Kempermann, G., Gage, F.H., 2000. Neural consequences of environmental enrichment. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 1, 191e198.
Will, B., Galani, R., Kelche, C., Rosenzweig, M.R., 2004. Recovery from brain injury in
animals: relative efcacy of environmental enrichment, physical exercise or
formal training (1990e2002). Prog. Neurobiol. 72, 167e182.
Wong, E.H., Levi, D.M., McGraw, P.V., 2005. Spatial interactions reveal inhibitory
cortical networks in human amblyopia. Vision Res. 45, 2810e2819.