Está en la página 1de 35

Automated Assembly Systems

Automated Assembly Systems

INTRODUCTION

Type III-A or I-A Manufacturing System


~ Designed to perform fixed sequence of assembly steps on a specific product
~ Used for high production of products that require limited number of parts to
be assembled
~ Stations are integrated with MH system
~ These are examples of fixed automation
Requirements
High product demand
Stable product design
Limited number of components
Product is designed for automated assembly
Comparison with transfer lines
Assembly operation vs processing operation
Smaller work units are produced
Less mechanical force is required and also the power
For the same number of stations AAS tend to be smaller in physical size
2

Automated Assembly Systems

Applications

Typical Products made by Automated Assembly:


~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~

Alarm Clocks
Ball Bearings
Ball Point Pens
Electrical Plugs and Sockets
Gear Boxes
Light Bulbs
Locks
PCB Assemblies
Small electric motors
Spark plugs
Wrist Watches

Automated Assembly Systems

Processes

Typical Assembly processes/activities performed in


Automated Assembly:
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~

Adhesive bonding
Insertion of components
Placement of components
Riveting
Screw Fastening
Snap Fitting
Soldering
Spot welding
Stapling
Stitching

Automated Assembly Systems

INTRODUCTION

Subsystems of AAS:
~ One or more assembly workstations
~ Parts feeding devices at individual workstation
~ Work handling system (Base part or partial assembly transfer)

Automated Assembly Systems

System Configurations

System Configurations:
~
~
~
~

In-line
Dial type Assembly Machine
Carousel Assembly System
Single station assembly machine

Automated Assembly Systems

System Configurations

System Configurations:
~
~
~
~

In-line
Dial type Assembly Machine
Carousel Assembly System
Single station assembly machine

Automated Assembly Systems

System Configurations

System Configurations:
~
~
~
~

In-line
Dial type Assembly Machine
Carousel Assembly System
Single station assembly machine

Automated Assembly Systems

System Configurations

System Configurations:
~
~
~
~

In-line
Dial type Assembly Machine
Carousel Assembly System
Single station assembly machine

Automated Assembly Systems

Workpart Transfer Systems:


~
~

Work part Transfer Systems

Synchronous
Asynchronous

Parts Delivery at Workstations:


Elements are:
~ Hopper
~ Parts Feeder
~ Selector and/or Orientor
~ Feed track
~ Escapement and placement device

10

Automated Assembly Systems

Workpart Transfer Systems:


~
~

Work part Transfer Systems

Synchronous
Asynchronous

Parts Delivery at Workstations:


Elements are:
~ Hopper
~ Parts Feeder
~ Selector and/or Orientor
~ Feed track
~ Escapement and placement device

11

Automated Assembly Systems

Vibratory Bowl Feeder

Most versatile of hopper feeders for small parts


Consists of bowl and helical track
Parts are poured into bowl
Helical track moves part from bottom of bowl to outlet
Vibration applied by electromagnetic base
Oscillation of bowl is constrained so that parts climb upward along
helical track

12

Automated Assembly Systems

Selector and/or Orientor

Purpose - to establish the proper


orientation of the components for the
assembly workhead
Selector
Acts as a filter
Only parts in proper orientation
are allowed to pass through to
feed track
Orientor
Allows properly oriented parts to
pass
Reorients parts that are not
properly oriented

13

Automated Assembly Systems

Feed Track

Moves parts from hopper to assembly workhead


Categories:
Gravity - hopper and feeder are located at higher elevation than workhead
Powered - uses air or vibration to move parts toward workhead

14

Automated Assembly Systems

Escapement and Placement Devices

Escapement device
Removes parts from feed track at time intervals that are consistent with the
cycle time of the assembly workhead

Placement device
Physically places the parts in the correct location at the assembly workstation
Escapement and placement devices are sometimes the same device,
sometimes different devices

15

Automated Assembly Systems

Escapement and Placement Devices

(a) Horizontal and (b) vertical devices for placement of parts onto dial-indexing
table

16

Automated Assembly Systems

Escapement and Placement Devices

Escapement of rivet-shaped parts actuated by work carriers

17

Automated Assembly Systems

Escapement and Placement Devices

Two types of pick-and-place mechanisms for transferring base parts from


feeders to work carriers

18

Automated Assembly Systems

Work part Transfer Systems

Parts Delivery at Workstations:


Elements are:
~ Hopper
~ Parts Feeder
~ Selector and/or Orientor
~ Feed track
~ Escapement and placement device

19

Automated Assembly Systems

~
~
~
~

Quantitative Analysis of
Assembly Systems

Parts Delivery System at Workstations


Multi-station Automated Assembly Systems
Single Station Automated Assembly Systems
Partial Automation

Parts Delivery System at Workstations:


Parts feeder feed rate
Probability of components passing through the selector
Effective rate of delivery of components from the hopper into the feed track
Delivery rate > Cycle rate
Low level sensor
High level sensor

20

Automated Assembly Systems

~
~
~
~

Quantitative Analysis of
Assembly Systems

Parts Delivery System at Workstations


Multi-station Automated Assembly Systems
Single Station Automated Assembly Systems
Partial Automation

Parts Delivery System at Workstations:


Example:
The cycle time for a given assembly workhead = 6 sec. The parts feeder has a
feed rate = 50 components per min. The probability that a given component fed
by the feeder will pass through the selector is 0.25. The number of parts in the
feed track corresponding to the low level sensor is 6. The capacity of the feed
track is 18 parts. Determine:
(a) How long it will take for the supply of parts in the feed track to go from high
level to low level? and
(b) How long it will take on average for the supply of parts to go from low level
to high level?

21

Automated Assembly Systems

~
~
~
~

Quantitative Analysis of
Assembly Systems

Parts Delivery System at Workstations


Multi-station Automated Assembly Systems
Single Station Automated Assembly Systems
Partial Automation

Parts Delivery System at Workstations:


Example:
A feeder-selector device at one of the stations of an automated assembly
machine has a feed rate of 25 parts per minute and provides a throughput of
one part in four. The ideal cycle time of the assembly machine is 10 sec. The
low level sensor on the feed track is set at 10 parts, and the high level sensor is
set at 20 parts.
(a) How long will it take for the supply of parts to be depleted from the high
level sensor to the low level sensor once the feeder-selector device is turned
off?
(b) How long will it take for the parts to be resupplied from the low level sensor
to the high level sensor, on average, after the feeder-selector device is turned
on?
(c) What proportion of the time that the assembly machine is operating will the
feeder-selector device be turned on? Turned off?
22

Automated Assembly Systems

~
~
~
~

Quantitative Analysis of
Assembly Systems

Parts Delivery System at Workstations:


Multi-station Automated Assembly Systems
Single Station Automated Assembly Systems
Partial Automation

Multi-station Automated Assembly Systems:


~ Synchronous transfer system
~ In-line, dial indexing, and carousel configuration
~ Constant element times, although the times are not necessarily equal at all
stations
~ No internal storage

23

Quantitative Analysis of
Assembly Systems

Automated Assembly Systems

Multi-station Automated Assembly Systems:


qi probability that the component to be added during current cycle is
defective
mi probability that a defect results in a jam at the station and consequent
stoppage of the line
Three events occur at a particular workstation:
The component is defective and causes a station jam, pi = qi*mi
The component is defective but does not cause a station jam = (1 mi)*qi
The component is not defective = (1 qi)
The probabilities of the three possible events must sum to unity for any
workstation
mi qi + (1 mi) qi + (1 - qi) = 1
For n station assembly line
n

q i (1 - m i ) q i (1 - q i ) 1

i 1

24

Automated Assembly Systems

Quantitative Analysis of
Assembly Systems

Multi-station Automated Assembly Systems:


Two of the three terms of earlier equation represent events in which a good
component is added at the given station.
miqi indicates that a station jam has occurred, and thus a defective component
has not been added to the existing assembly.
(1 - qi) means that a good component has been added at the station.
The sum of these two terms represents the probability that a defective
component is not added at station i.
Multiplying these probabilities for all stations, we get the proportion of
acceptable product coming off the line Pap.
n

Pap

1- q

mi qi

i 1

25

Automated Assembly Systems

Quantitative Analysis of
Assembly Systems

Multi-station Automated Assembly Systems:


The proportion of assemblies containing at least one defective component is
n
Pqp.
Pqp 1 - Pap 1 - 1 - q i m i q i
i 1

Other performances are:


machines production rate
proportion of uptime and downtime
F = Frequency of downtime occurrences per cycle
If each station jam results in a machine downtime occurrence, F can be
determined by taking the expected number of station jams per cycle
n

F pi mi q i
i 1

i 1

26

Quantitative Analysis of
Assembly Systems

Automated Assembly Systems

Example:
A ten-station in-line assembly machine has an ideal cycle time of 6 sec. The base part is
automatically loaded prior to the first station, and components are added at each of the
stations. The fraction defect rate at each of the ten stations is q = 0.01, and the
probability that a defect will jam is m = 0.5. When a jam occurs, the average downtime is
2 min. Cost to operate the assembly machine is Rs. 2500 /hr. Other costs areignored.
Determine:
(a) Average production rate of all assemblies
(b) Yield of good assemblies
(c) Average production rate of good products
(d) Uptime efficiency of the assembly machine, and
(e) Cost per unit

Rp(pc/hr)

Yield

Rap(pc/hr)

Cpc ($)

0.5

600

600

100%

0.07

0.01

0.5

300

0.951

285

50%

0.15

0.02

0.5

200

0.904

181

33.3%

0.23

0.01

600

0.904

543

100%

0.08

0.01

0.5

300

0.951

285

50%

0.15

0.01

1.0

200

200

33.3%

0.21
27

Automated Assembly Systems

Quantitative Analysis of
Assembly Systems

Keypoints:
As fraction defect rate increases, meaning that component quality gets worse,
all five measures of performance suffer.
The effect of m is less obvious.
At low values of m (m = 0) for the same component quality level q, production
rate and machine efficiency are high but the yield of good product i.e.
proportion of acceptable products, is low.
Instead of interrupting the assembly machine operation and causing downtime,
all defective components pass through the assembly process to become part of
the final product.
At m = 1, all defective components are removed before they become part of the
product. Therefore yield i.e. proportion of acceptable products, is 100% but
removing the defects takes time, adversely affecting production rate, efficiency
and cost per unit.

28

Automated Assembly Systems

Quantitative Analysis of
Assembly Systems

Instantaneous Control vs. Memory Control:


Memory control (m = 0) requires sorting station and instantaneous control
(m = 1) stops the machine when a defect occurs.
Memory control has to consider cost of additional sensors, controls and
sortation devices and will be more useful if sortation station is 100% effective.
Instantaneous control has to consider the cost of lost production time due to
stopping of the machines
The selection of control may be justified using the cost per unit factor.

29

Automated Assembly Systems

~
~
~
~

Quantitative Analysis of
Assembly Systems

Parts Delivery System at Workstations:


Multi-station Automated Assembly Systems
Single Station Automated Assembly Systems
Partial Automation

Single-station Automated Assembly Systems:


~ A single workstation with several components feeding into the station to be
assembled to a base part
~ Increasing the number of elements in the assembly machine cycle results
in a higher cycle time, decreasing the production rate of the machine

30

Automated Assembly Systems

Quantitative Analysis of
Assembly Systems

Single-station Automated Assembly Systems:


ne = number of distinct assembly elements that are performed on the machine
Tej = element time
Th = handling time (loading of base part and unloading of assembled product)
ne

Ideal cycle time Tc can be expressed as:

Tc Th Tej
j 1

ne

Tp Tc q j m j Td
j 1

Instead of component addition if certain activity is carried out (welding,


fastening) then pj can be used as the probability of station failure during
element j.

31

Automated Assembly Systems

Quantitative Analysis of
Assembly Systems

Example:
A single-station assembly machine performs five work elements to assemble four
components to a base part. The elements are listed in the table below, together with the
fraction defect rate (q) and probability of a station jam (m) for each of the components
added (NA means Not Applicable).
Time to load the base part is 3 sec and time to unload the completed assembly is 4 sec,
giving a total load/unload time of Th = 7 sec. When a jam occurs, it takes an average of
1.5 min. to clear the jam and restart the machine. Determine:
(a) Production rate of all products
(b) Yield of good product
(c) Production rate of good products
(d) Uptime efficiency of the assembly machine

Element

Operation

Time (sec)

Add gear

0.02

Add spacer

0.01

0.6

Add gear

0.015

0.8

Add gear and mesh

0.02

Fasten

NA

0.012
32

Automated Assembly Systems

~
~
~
~

Quantitative Analysis of
Assembly Systems

Parts Delivery System at Workstations:


Multi-station Automated Assembly Systems
Single Station Automated Assembly Systems
Partial Automation

Partial Automation:
~ Combination of automated and manual workstations
~ Reasons:
Automation is introduced gradually on an existing manual line
Certain manual operations are too difficult or too costly to automate

33

Automated Assembly Systems

Quantitative Analysis of
Assembly Systems

Partial Automation:
Assumptions:
~ workstations perform either processing or assembly operations
~ processing and assembly times at automated stations are constant,
though not necessarily equal at all stations
~ synchronous transfer of parts
~ no internal buffer storage
~ upper-bound approach is applicable
~ station breakdowns occur only at automated stations
~ human adaptability
~ Tc remains constant over time
The ideal cycle time is determined with the bottleneck station (manual)
Because of random variation in any repetitive human activity Tc will show
certain degree of variation

34

Automated Assembly Systems

Quantitative Analysis of
Assembly Systems

Partial Automation:
na = number of automated stations
nw = number of stations operated by manual workers
n = na + nw = total station count
Casi = Cost to operate automatic workstation, i (Rs/min)
Cwi = Cost to operate manual workstation, i (Rs/min)
Cat = Cost to operate the automatic transfer mechanism (Rs/min)
Co = total cost to operate the line
ne

Tp Tc

Td

ina

pi q i mi

C o C at

i na

C pc

asi

wi

inw

C m C o Tp C t
Pap
35

También podría gustarte