Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
The attached
copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research
and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution
and sharing with colleagues.
Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or
licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party
websites are prohibited.
In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the
article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or
institutional repository. Authors requiring further information
regarding Elseviers archiving and manuscript policies are
encouraged to visit:
http://www.elsevier.com/authorsrights
Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Suez Canal University, Ismailia 41522, Egypt
Department of Microbiology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 6 December 2013
Received in revised form 6 March 2014
Accepted 28 March 2014
Available online 6 April 2014
Keywords:
Protease
Halophilic
Alkalithermophilic
Wadi An Natrun
Alkalibacillus sp.
a b s t r a c t
An extracellular alkaline, halo- and thermostable protease (AbCP) produced by a novel Alkalibacillus sp.
NM-Fa4, isolated from the alkaline, hypersaline lakes of the Wadi An Natrun, was puried to homogeneity by precipitation with ethanol and anion-exchange chromatography. The molecular weight of the
puried protease was 19.7 kDa. AbCP retains proteolytic activity over broad sodium chloride, pH and
temperature ranges, with maximal activity at 1 M NaCl, pH45 C 9.5 and 5052 C. AbCP was resistant
to phenylmethylsulfonyl uoride (2 mM) and ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid (2 mM), stimulated by
the reducing agents dithiothreitol (2 mM) and -mercaptoethanol (1% v/v) and inhibited with iodoacetic
acid (5 mM), suggesting that AbCP is a cysteine protease. AbCP showed stability toward anionic surfactants (sodium dodecyl sulfate), oxidizing agents (H2 O2 ), chemical denaturants (urea), and retained most
of its activity in the presence of 1% v/v of the non-ionic surfactant Tween 80. The protease was stable
in 50% mixtures of ethanol and, to a lesser extent, methanol, and was stimulated by Mg2+ , Ca2+ , and
Fe2+ . AbCP shows a broad substrate specicity and hydrolyzes both natural and synthetic substrates.
Based on the LineweaverBurk plot, the Km with casein as substrate was 1.3 0.007 mg/mL and Vmax
was 1111 mg/ml/min. The stability of the enzyme under the combined extreme conditions of high salt
concentration, alkaline pH and high temperature, in addition to being resistant to chemical denaturants, oxidizing agents, surfactants as well as exhibiting broad substrate specicity makes this enzyme a
promising candidate for a variety of biotechnological applications.
2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
There has been a signicant increase in the use of enzymes as
industrial catalysts. The global market for enzymes was estimated
at $3.3 billion in 2010, and is expected to reach $4.4 billion by 2015,
with a compound annual growth rate of 6% over a 5-year period.
Proteases constitute the largest product segment in the industrial
enzymes market. Proteases (EC 3.4.21-24) are a large group of
hydrolytic enzymes that cleave peptide bonds and degrade proteins
into smaller peptides and amino acids. Proteases constitute a big
share of the enzyme market primarily as detergent additives, and
also in the food, organic synthesis and pharmaceutical industries
75
N.M. Mesbah, J. Wiegel / Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic 105 (2014) 7481
of 2.5 mL/min. Protein content (absorbance at 254 nm) and protease activity were determined. Fractions showing the highest
protease activity were pooled, desalted by dialyzing overnight
against 50 mM TrisCl buffer, pH 9.0, and concentrated by ultraltration (Vivaspin, Sartorius AG). Purity of the protein was checked
by SDS-PAGE.
2.5. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrlyamide gel electrophoresis
(SDS-PAGE) and zymography
SDS-PAGE was carried out for the control of the purity and
the determination of enzyme molecular weight as described by
Laemmli [25], in a discontinuous system made of a 4% stacking gel
and 12% separating gel. Samples were heated at 100 C for 3 min
in Laemmli sample buffer before electrophoresis. The molecular
weight of the enzyme was estimated using an EZ-Run TM Rec protein
ladder (Fisher Bioreagents).
Zymography was performed on SDS-PAGE by the method of
Schmidt et al. [26], with modications. Polyacrylamide gels (12%)
were copolymerized with 0.1% gelatin. Samples were mixed with
sample buffer without heat denaturation, and electrophoresed at
125 V. After electrophoresis, the gels were washed once in 50 mM
TrisCl buffer, pH 9.0, then immersed in the same buffer containing 2.5% (wt./vol.) Triton-X-100 at room temperature with shaking
for 30 min to remove SDS. Triton-X-100 was removed by washing the gels three times in 50 mM TrisCl, pH 9.0 (10 min each). The
gels were then incubated in 50 mM TrisCl buffer, pH 9.0 containing
1.7 M NaCl at 50 C for 30 min. Finally, the gels were stained with a
0.05% (wt./vol.) solution of Coomassie blue R (10% acetic acid, 50%
methanol) for 30 min, then destained (7% acetic acid, 5% methanol)
for 2 h. Proteolytic activity was observed as a clear band of lysis
against a uniformly blue background.
2.6. Biochemical properties of puried protease
2.6.1. Effect of [Na+ ] on enzyme activity
To determine the effect of [Na+ ] on protease activity, the rate of
casein degradation with puried enzyme was evaluated at different
NaCl concentrations ranging from 0 to 3.2 M.
2.6.2. Effect of pH on enzyme activity and stability
To determine the effect of pH on protease activity, protease
activity was tested over a pH range 7.012.0 (measured at 45 ). For
study of pH stability, the enzyme was incubated for 48 h at room
temperature in buffer adjusted to the test pH, and residual proteolytic activity was assayed using standard assay. The buffer system
used was 50 mM Tris (pH 7.09.0) and 50 mM glycineNaOH (pH
9.012.0).
2.6.3. Effect of temperature on enzyme activity and stability
Protease activity was tested at different temperatures ranging
from 30 to 80 C for 20 min at pH 9.0. Heat stability of the puried protease was determined after incubation at 35, 40, 45, 50,
55 and 65 C for 120 min. Residual proteolytic activity was determined using the standard assay at 50 C. Enzyme that had not been
incubated served as the 100% control.
100
100
77
73
68
66
Fig. 1. Neighbor-joining tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequences showing the position of strain NM-Fa4 in relation to the type species of the genus Alkalibacillus.
GenBank accession numbers for the sequences are shown in parentheses. The tree
was rooted with the 16S rRNA gene sequence of Bacillus subtilis DSM 10T as outgroup. Numbers at nodes denote bootstrap values based on 100 replicates. Bar, 1
nucleotide substitution per 100 bases.
Fig. 2. SDS PAGE of puried protease, AbCP. (A) Assessment of homogeneity and
molecular weight of AbCP by 12% SDS PAGE. Lanes 13 represent: molecular
weight marker, ethanol precipitated protein, AbCP (30 g). (B) Zymogram of AbCP.
(C) Zymogram of supernatant from Alkalibacillus sp. NM-Fa4 culture. The white,
unstained region in the gel shows hydrolysis of gelatin by the enzyme.
Fig. 3. Effect of NaCl on protease activity. Assays were performed at pH45 C 9.0 and
50 C. Activity at 1 M NaCl was taken as 100%, and was equivalent to 84 U/mg. Each
value represents the mean of three assays, bars denote standard error.
N.M. Mesbah, J. Wiegel / Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic 105 (2014) 7481
Table 1
Purication of protease from Alkalibacillus sp. NM-Fa4.
Purication step
Culture supernatant
Ethanol precipitate
Q-sepharose
1323
640
205
Fold purication
Yield (%)
9.5
42.7
93.2
1
4.5
9.8
100
48.4
15.5
Table 2
Stability and activity of protease in the presence of enzyme inhibitors.
Relative activity (%) standard errora
Inhibitor
Control
PMSF
EDTA
DTT
Iodoacetic acid
-ME
2 mM
5 mM
100 0.9
99 0.7
117 2.6
172 3.3
32 0.9
146 3.5(1% vol/vol)
100 1.4
94 2.2
94 2.3
130 3.8
30 0.5
167 4.6(5% vol/vol)
a
Assays were performed at 50 C, pH 9.0 in the presence of 1.7 M NaCl. One
hundred percent activity was equivalent to 81 U/mg.
Fig. 4. Effect of pH45 C on protease activity () and stability (), at 50 C in the pres
ence of 1.7 M NaCl. Activity at pH45 C 9.5 was taken as 100%, and was equivalent to
76 U/mg. For assays of pH stability, the enzyme was incubated at room temperature in buffer adjusted to the test pH for 48 h, then activity was assayed at 50 C
after addition of substrate. Each value represents mean of three assays, bars denote
standard error.
Table 3
Effect of metal ions on protease activity.
Metal Ion
Control
KCl
MgCl2
CaCl2
FeSO4
HgCl2
100
138
114
157
123
80
1 mM
1.5
4.4
4.5
5.0
3.8
2.9
5 mM
10 mM
100 2.2
69 1.4
119 2.3
119 4.2
155 2.6
No activity
100 2.5
64 1.3
165 1.8
74 1.6
82 3.2
No activity
a
Assays performed at 50 C, pH 9.0, in the presence of indicated concentration of
cation. Control was performed in the absence of cations. Protein preparations were
dialyzed before the assay. One hundred percent activity was equivalent to 86 U/mg.
of Zn2+ , Cs2+ , Ba2+ , Cu2+ , Sr2+ , Mn2+ , Ag+ , and Al3+ , retaining less
than 15% of its initial activity. However, MgCl2 had a stimulatory
effect, addition of 10 mM to the reaction mixture increased the protease activity by 65% compared with a control with no Mg2+ added
(Table 3).
3.6. Effect of surfactants and detergents
Fig. 5. Effect of temperature on protease activity () and stability () at pH45 C 9.0
and 1.7 M NaCl. Activity at 50 C was taken as 100%, and was equivalent to 90 U/mg.
For assays of temperature stability, the protein was incubated at the specic temper
ature at pH45 C in the presence of 1.7 M NaCl for 2 h, and then activity was assayed
at the respective temperature after addition of substrate. Each value represents the
mean of three assays, bars denote standard error.
Control
SDS
Triton-X-100
H2 O2
Tween 20
Tween 80
Urea
5%
100 2.2
166 3.3
112 0.6
112 3.3
53 2.1
94 3.4
100 2.3 (2 M)
100 1.7
197 4.5
No activity
134 2.4
44 2.0
55 2.2
144 3.2 (4 M)
a
Assays performed at 50 C, pH 9.0 in the presence of 1.7 M NaCl. One hundred
percent activity was equivalent to 82 U/mg.
79
Table 5
Effect of organic solvents on protease activity.
Solventa
Control
Ethanol
Methanol
Isopropanol
Butanol
100
123
74
47
37
3.2
2.6
2.1
0.6
1.3
regression
from
the
LineWeaver
Burke
plot
was
1.3 0.007 mg/mL. The protease had a Vmax of 1111 mg/ml/min.
3.10. Whole genome sequence analysis of Alkalibacillus sp.
NM-Fa4 and identication and analysis of putative protease gene
The genome of Alkalibacillus sp. NM-Fa4 has an estimated size
of 6 Mbp and contains 9202 putative coding sequences. Fortyone putative proteases were annotated in the Alkalibacillus sp.
NM-Fa4 genome, including 8 putative serine alkaline proteases,
5 putative metalloproteases, 2 putative cysteine proteases and
5 putative carboxyl-terminal proteases. The remaining putative
enzymes belonged either to the CAAX amino terminal protease
family, membrane bound zinc metalloprotease family (htpX), and
Lon-like proteases. Of the two putative cysteine proteases identied, one had a predicted molecular weight of 86.2 kDa, and the
other 19.7 kDa. Analysis of the puried protein by both native and
SDS-PAGE and experimental data, suggest that the latter protein
was AbCP. This conclusion was further supported by that the other
proteases annotated had estimated molecular weights greater than
30 kDa. The putative amino acid sequence of AbCP was 177 amino
acids long and has an estimated isoelectric point of 4.84 (estimated
by the Compute pI/Mw tool at www.expasy.org). BLAST analysis of
the amino acid sequence showed that it had 84% sequence identity with a putative cysteine protease from Alkalilimnicola ehrlichii
MLHE-1 (WP 0011628525) and 73% identity to putative cysteine
protease from Methylomonas methanica (WP 013819676). In addition, AbCP exhibited 70 and 60% sequence identity with cysteine
protease from Methylophilus methylotrophus (WP 01897339) and
Teredinibacter turnerae (WP 018274867), respectively. Catalytic
residues Gln42 , Cys79 , His112 , and Asp145 [31] are present in AbCP,
and are also found in other cysteine proteases analyzed (Fig. 7).
4. Discussion
Table 6
Substrate specicity of protease.
Substratea
Casein
Peptone
Skim milk
Casamino acids
Tryptone
BSA
Wheat gluten
Gelatin
88
95
81
60
2.2
95
95
182
a
b
1.4
1.1
0.5
0.4
0.9
0.6
1.4
3.2
N.M. Mesbah, J. Wiegel / Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic 105 (2014) 7481
AbCP
A. ehrlichii
Me. methanica
M. methylotrophus
T. turnerae
AbCP
A. ehrlichii
Me. methanica
M. methylotrophus
T. turnerae
*
20
*
40
*
60
*
MEVQDLPDDVLTYLLPSRYCESDRFMQMAWSIVGDARPGHDQVARITDWIRENVRFNPDSPHFQLSAVELNQARE
VEVQDLPDDALTYLLPSRYCESDRFLDMAWSIVGDAHPGYDQVARIEAWIREHVHFNPDSPHFQLSAVELNQARE
EEVQNLPNAVLTYLLPTRYCESDRFIDLARELVEHALPGYDQVAAINEWIRQNVRFNPDSPYFQMSAVEVNQARE
EEIQHLPPHVLTYLLPSRYCESDKFIDLSKEIVAHVQPGYDQVSAIEQWIRQNIRFNPDSPHFQLSAVEVNQQRE
ISVQNLPDSVLKYLLPSRYCESDCFNEMATEITQNQSPGYDQVAAVEHWLRQTIRFEPGSSSFPSSAIEVNKVRV
e6Q LP vLtYLLP3RYCESD F 6a 6v
PGyDQVa 6 W6R2 6rFnPdSp Fq SA6E6Nq Re
80
*
100
*
120
*
140
*
GVCREFAHLGIALCRGLCIPARMVVGFLHGLEPMDFHAWFEAYIGGRWVAFDATQPEDCGKRVTVACGRDAADVA
GVCREFAHLGIALCRALCVPARMAVGYLHGLQPMDFHAWFEAYVGGRWCVFDATQPPGRRGRVTVAYGRDAADVA
GVCRDLAHLGIALCRALCIPARMVVGYLHGLQPMDFHAWFEAYVGGRWYSFDPTQPEPRGGRVVVAYGHDAADVA
GVCRELAHLGIALCRGLCIPARMVVGYLHGLQPMDFHAWFEAYVNGRWYTFDPSQSESVGGRITVAYGRDAADVA
160
IFNQFGPPMYPTRIGVTVEEVEGPPAV
AbCP
IYNQFGPPMYPTRISVTVDRLEGPPAV
A. ehrlichii
IFTQFGPALSPIHMAVTVEALSGPPEMe. methanica
M. methylotrophus IFNQFGPALYPEVMQVRVTQLAAAPVIYNQFGPPVFPYEEAVQVTLSDSS--T. turnerae
Fig. 7. Multiple sequence alignment of the putative amino acid sequence of AbCP with those of putative cysteine proteases from Alkalilimnicola ehrlichii (WP 0011628525),
Methylomonas methanica (WP 013819676), Methylophilus methylotrophus (WP 01897339) and Teredinibacter turnerae (WP 018274867). Catalytic residues are highlighted in
black. Gray blocks denote highly conserved regions.
protease from Bacillus sp. 17N-1 was found to be active in the presence of dimethylsulfoxide and acetonitrile. However, this enzyme
was active only over the temperature range of 1433 C and the
NaCl range 0.20.8 M [41].
Proteases are the largest selling industrial enzymes, with
current applications in detergent formulations, and anticipated
applications in protein processing and peptide synthesis. However, the above applications require that the enzymes be stable in
salts and organic solvents [42]. Other industrial applications such
as food processing and environmental bioremediation also necessitate proteases that are not only salt stable, but also tolerant to
high temperatures and stable in the presence of organic solvents
[43]. In the food industry, salt and alkaline stable proteases have
potential applications in fermentation. During the processing of
soy sauce, proteolytic modication of soy proteins by proteases
results in production of soluble hydrolysates with low bitterness
[44]. Industries which include processes such as pickling as well
as oil and gas recovery processes lead to the production of wastewater brines [45]. Enzymes that retain activity in the presence of
high salt concentrations as well as a wide range of pH values can
facilitate remediation of these wastewaters in an environmentally
sound manner. Aerobic treatment systems for biological treatment
of industrial wastewaters with salt concentration up to 1.5 M have
been developed, but only produce satisfactory results at salt concentrations around 0.5 M [45,46]. Addition of enzyme preparations
that are both salt stable and temperature tolerant could increase
the efcacy of such bioreactors.
5. Conclusions
To conclude, the present study describes purication and
characterization of a new protease, named AbCP, produced by Alkalibacillus sp. NM-Fa4. AbCP shows many differences from other
described cysteine proteases in terms of maximal pH, temperature and salt concentration for activity, in addition to stability
in the presence of denaturants, surfactants, oxidizing agents and
metal ions. Activity of AbCP over a wide range of sodium chloride
concentrations, temperatures and alkaline pH values makes the
enzyme a potential efcient choice in chemical, pharmaceutical and
biotechnological industries where resistance to harsh conditions is
required.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the US-Egypt Science and Technology Joint Fund in cooperation with the Suez Canal University
(Egypt) under project number 1841 and the University of Georgia
(USA) under project number NSF-OISE-1132412.
References
[1] L. Rosenberg, O. Lapid, A. Bogdanov-Berezovsky, R. Glesinger, Y. Krieger, E.
Silberstein, A. Sagi, K. Judkins, A.J. Singer, Burns 8 (2004) 843850.
[2] I.F. Starley, P. Mohammed, G. Schneider, S.W. Bickler, Burns 25 (1999) 636639.
[3] Y. Guo, D. Pan, M. Tanokura, Food Chem. 114 (2009) 328333.
[4] C.L. Ma, X.M. Ni, Z.M. Chi, L.Y. Ma, L.M. Gao, Mar. Biotechnol. 9 (2007) 343351.
[5] M.W.W. Adams, F.B. Perler, R.M. Kelly, Nat. Biotechnol. 13 (1995) 662668.
[6] J. Gomes, W. Steiner, Food Technol. Biotechnol. 42 (2004) 223235.
[7] D.W. Hough, M.J. Danson, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 1 (1999) 3946.
[8] R. Karan, M.D. Capes, S. DasSarma, Aquat. Biosyst. 8 (2012) 4.
[9] M.P. Taylor, L. van Zyl, M. Tufn, D. Cowan, in: R.P. Anitori (Ed.), Extremophiles:
Microbiology and Biotechnology, Caister Academic Press, Norfolk, UK, 2012.
[10] F. Abidi, J.M. Chobert, T. Haertle, M.N. Marzouki, Process Biochem. 46 (2011)
23012310.
[11] S.D. Gohel, S.P. Singh, J. Chromatogr. B 889890 (2012) 6168.
[12] S.D. Gohel, S.P. Singh, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 56 (2013) 2027.
[13] A. Haddar, A. Bougatef, R. Agrebi, A. Sellami-Kamoun, M. Nasri, Process
Biochem. 44 (2009) 2935.
[14] M. Manikandan, L. Pasic, V. Kannan, World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 25 (2009)
22472256.
[15] T. Maruthiah, P. Esakkiraj, G. Prabakaran, A. Palavesam, G. Immanuel, Biocatal.
Agric. Biotechnol. 2 (2013) 116119.
[16] s. Pandey, K.D. Rakholiya, V.H. Raval, S.P. Singh, J. Biosci. Bioeng. 114 (2012)
251256.
[17] R.K. Patel, M.S. Dodia, R.H. Joshi, S.P. Singh, Process Biochem. 41 (2006)
20022009.
[18] S. Shankar, M. Rao, R.S. Laxman, Process Biochem. 46 (2011) 579585.
[19] Y. Toyokawa, H. Takahara, A. Reungsang, M. Fukuta, Y. Hachimine, S. Tachibana,
M. Yasuda, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 86 (2010) 18671875.
[20] M.B. Rao, A.M. Tanksale, M.S. Ghatge, V.V. Deshpande, Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
62 (1998) 597635.
[21] D. Jain, I. Pancha, S.K. Mishra, A. Shrivastav, S. Mishra, Bioresour. Technol. 115
(2012) 228236.
81
[22] K. Wilson, in: F.M. Ausubel, R. Brent, R.E. Kingston, D.D. Moore, J.G. Seidman,
J.A. Smith, K. Struhl (Eds.), Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, John Wiley
& Sons, Inc., New York, 1997, pp. 241245.
[23] M.L. Anson, J. Gen. Physiol. 22 (1938) 7989.
[24] M.M. Bradford, Anal. Biochem. 72 (1976) 248254.
[25] U.K. Laemmli, Nature 227 (1970) 680685.
[26] T.M. Schmidt, B. Bleakley, K.H. Nealson, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 54 (1988)
27932797.
[27] A. Tritt, J.A. Eisen, M.T. Facciotti, A.E. Darling, PLoS ONE 7 (2012) e42304.
[28] D.R. Zerbino, E. Birney, Genome Res. 2008 (2008) 821829.
[29] R.K. Aziz, D. Bartels, B.A.A.M. DeJongh, T. Disz, R.A. Edwards, K. Formsma, S.
Gerdes, E.M. Glass, M. Kubal, F. Meyer, G.J. Olsen, R. Olson, A.L. Osterman, R.A.
Overbeek, L.K. McNeil, D. Paarmann, T. Pacizian, B. Parrello, G.D. Pusch, C. Reich,
R. Stevens, O. Vassieva, V. Vonstein, A. Wilke, O. Zagnitko, BMC Genomics 9
(2008) 75.
[30] C.O. Jeon, J.-M. Lim, J.-M. Lee, L.-H. Xu, C.-L. Jiang, C.-J. Kim, Int. J. Syst. Evol.
Microbiol. 55 (2005) 18911896.
[31] N.D. Rawlings, F.R. Morton, C.Y. Kok, J. Kong, A.J. Barrett, Nucleic Acids Res. 36
(2006) D320D325.
[32] N.M. Mesbah, J. Wiegel, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78 (2012) 40744082.
[33] S.K. Singh, S.P. Singh, V.R. Tripathi, S.K. Garg, Process Biochem. 47 (2012)
14791487.
[34] R. Sinha, S.K. Khare, Bioresour. Technol. 145 (2013) 357361.
[35] S. Ma, L.S. Devi-Kesavan, J. Gao, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129 (2007)
1363313645.
[36] H.A. Chapman, R.J. Riese, G.-P. Shi, Annu. Rev. Physiol. 59 (1997) 6388.
[37] T. Ohbayashi, A. Irie, Y. Maurakami, M. Nowak, J. Potempa, Y. Nishimura, M.
Shinohara, T. Imamura, Microbiology 157 (2011) 786792.
[38] J.M. Kirby, H. Ahern, A.K. Roberts, V. Kumar, Z. Freeman, K.R. Acharya, C.C. Shone,
J. Biol. Chem. 284 (2009) 3466634673.
[39] G.J. Olsen, R. Dagil, L.M. Niclasen, O.E. Sorensen, B.B. Kragelund, J. Mol. Biol. 393
(2009) 693703.
[40] D. Ullmann, H. Jakubke, Eur. J. Biochem. 223 (1994) 865872.
[41] E.M. Papamichael, L.G. Tehodorou, A. Persynakis, A. Drainas, Environ. Technol.
31 (2010) 10731082.
[42] R. Gupta, Q.K. Beg, S. Khan, B. Chauhan, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 59 (2002)
1532.
[43] M. de Lourdes Moreno, D. Perez, M.T. Garcia, E. Mellado, Life 3 (2013)
3851.
[44] I.P. Sarethy, Y. Saxena, A. Kapoor, M. Sharma, S.K. Sharma, V. Gupta, S. Gupta, J.
Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 38 (2011) 769790.
[45] A. Oren, Environ. Technol. 31 (2010) 825834.
[46] O. Lefebvre, R. Moletta, Water Res. 40 (2006) 36713682.