Annotated Bibliography: Making Young Hamlet Harkins, Matthew. Making Young Hamlet. Matthew Harkins begins his article by proposing the vital role of youth, and its critical subordinate position in Hamlet. Rather than portray an archetypal contest between the young and the old or portray Hamlets developmental progression from youth to maturity, the play examines the production and application of these categories as political phenomena (333). Harkins tries to argue that in Hamlet, the mystery of his age raises questions about social constructions of youth, and that there are ideological assumptions about the propriety of age controlling youth (338). Harkins also tries to add that the age of Hamlet from the beginning of the play has the audience introduced to the young Hamlet, something he is referred to as in the first act, and his transition into an adult, as maturity plays an important role on the decisions he makes and the experiences he undergoes. Bloom would find Harkins thoughts to be critical, which he states in the beginning of his essay. Bloom found Hamlet to be completely matured by Act 5, showing a collected side of him, no longer bickering like an immature little boy. Hamlets age does make an impact on his character throughout the play, as we see an immature Hamlet during his famous To be or not to be soliloquy, contemplating suicide because he feels that he cannot handle the situation that is brought before him. Bloom would argue that this is the young, pre-critical Hamlet because he is looking for the easy way out instead of dealing with his problems. Hamlets situation may be overwhelming for any age group, but his behavior would constantly be changing by showing signs of erratic, irrational, and unstable actions cause other members of the play to persistently questioning him. These are all signs of a youthful Hamlet, still trying to figure out who he is and what represents himself. If the power of an ideology rests in its broad social acceptance, Hamlet focuses on local moments in which cultural stereotypes and assumptions fall apart (347). This statement by Harkins shows a critical thinking Hamlet, one who has already matured, and is ready to face the consequences of his actions. Hamlet is no longer judged for his behavior, which Bloom would argue that by act 5, we see the pre-critical, youthful Hamlet changed into a more mature, attuned to his surroundings. He is ready to finally avenge his father, which Harkins quotes If Old Hamlets commission sentenced Young Hamlet to death before he gave his own character life, we assumed that was because of the nature of revenge and the risks revengers run (802). It was clear throughout the play the toll that revenge took on the younger Hamlet, who was afraid of death. Bloom would argue that in the final act of the play, the mature Hamlet had experienced enough in his life that he had games knowledge of death and what represents him as a person, allowing death into his life. I believe that Harold Bloom would agree with Harkins point of view on Hamlet, and his transition from a younger, pre-critical Hamlet, to a mature critical Hamlet, who is actually ready to avenge his father, and accept the consequences that come with it. Bloom would use Harkins article to support his theory that in death, Hamlet learned to appreciate life.