13 vistas

Cargado por dinesh23cbe

EPE_2013112110290960

- Thermodynamics Problem Set With Solutions
- Steam Turbine
- Turbine
- Ch.1 What is Steam
- A Calculated Study of Wet Steam Flow in the Combined Exhaust
- Condensate and Feed
- Problem Sheet No 5
- Steam Turbines
- Condition Monitoring of Steam Turbines by Performance Analysis
- Admon Del Ries-Mod 1-2010
- IL IOF Steam Presentation (1)
- Cool Water Dispenser
- Export Outlook Vietnam
- 46 1086 Ejectors for Cpi
- Start_Up (1) - 250 Mw.pdf
- executive summary power plant
- Ammonia Plant analyse pinch
- Air Cooled Condenser - A Dry Cooling Tower
- Pid Notes
- iec61970cim15v33_iec61968cim11v13_iec62325cim01v07-changes

Está en la página 1de 4

doi:10.4236/epe.2013.54B279 Published Online July 2013 (http://www.scirp.org/journal/epe)

**Calculation of the Choked Back Pressure for Steam
**

Turbines with Air Cooled Condensers

Haisheng Yang, Shuping Chang, Ruitao Wu

Thermal Technology Department, Hebei Electric Power Research Institute, Shijiazhuang, Hebei PRC.

Email: haisheng.yang@gmail.com, hbdyycsp@163.com, hbdyywrt@163.com

Received September, 2012

ABSTRACT

The choked back pressure characteristic of the steam turbine unit with air cooled condenser is very different with the

unit with wet cooling technology, and the understanding of the choked back pressure performance change with operation load is important to guide the economic operation of the unit. One simplified Variable Operation Condition Analysis Method was put forward for calculation of the unit output-turbine back pressure characteristics. Based on this

method, the choked back pressure for each operation load can be determined. An example was given for a super-critical,

regenerative single-shaft, 2-casing with 2-exhaust steam turbine generation unit with air cooled condenser. The calculation result was provided and compared with the result of the unit with wet cooling technology.

Keywords: Air Cooled Condenser; Steam Turbine; Choked Back Pressure Characteristic; Calculation

1. Introduction

In the past years, many of the large capacity steam turbine generation units with air-cooled condensers (ACCs)

have been put into operation. It is shown that the safe

operation of the units has been solved based on the operation experiences of the built units. On the other hand,

very few attentions have been paid to the economic operation of the units with ACCs.

The major difference between the normal generation

units with wet cooling technology and the units with

ACCs is the steam turbine cold end design. For steam

turbines with ACCs, special designed LP last blading is

used, and the resulted characteristic of generator output

versus turbine back pressure is completely different with

the turbines using wet cooling technology. For choked

back pressure the steam turbines with ACCs, few calculation and testing results has been published except some

discussions on the theoretical principles of the choked

back pressure.

Analysis of the change of turbine choked back pressure with the operation load can provide direct guidance

on the economic operation of the generation units. This

paper will analyze this issue theoretically, and provide a

simplified method for calculation.

**2. Calculation Model of Choked Back
**

Pressure for Steam Turbine with

Air-cooled Condensers

The turbine choked back pressure refers to the back

Copyright © 2013 SciRes.

**pressure under which the steam flow speed at the exit of
**

the turbine last blade is close to the local sound speed

(Mach number around 0.95). The choked back pressure

is related to the turbine inlet steam flow, that is, with the

change of the inlet steam flow, the choked back pressure

also varies.

Under normal operation condition, to keep the unit

generator output stable and constant, the turbine inlet

steam flow decreases with the lowering down of the turbine back pressure. But if the decreasing of back pressure

exceeds a limit or the turbine choked back pressure, the

steam inlet flow increases to maintain the same generator

output.

For the units with ACCs, it is possible that the actual

operation turbine back pressure is controlled below the

choked back pressure limit, thus the unit performance

will deteriorate. This could be avoided by lowering down

of speed the ACC fans.

**2.1. The Calculation of the Steam Turbines
**

Choked Back Pressure

It can be deduced from the definition of the turbine

choked back pressure that under the constant turbine inlet

flow, the generator output will increase with the decreasing of the turbine back pressure until a critical back

pressure value is reached. If the back pressure is continuously decreased than this critical back pressure, the

unit power output will not increase but decrease. This

critical back pressure can be regarded as the turbine

choked back pressure.

EPE

The LP turbine expansion process is shown on Figure 1. It can be shown on Figure 1 that during normal operation. Many of the turbine last stages are curved and twisted. The new extraction parameters can be found using the corrected extraction pressure and the same LP turbine expansion line. the flow passage area of the control stages and thus the steam inlet flow is constant when the turbine back pressure has some variations. the solution of the turbine choked back pressure can be change into a problem of how to determine the turbine power output change as a function of the turbine back pressure change. In summary. 3. The only exception is the LP turbine last stage. The control stage efficiency can be regarded as constant. where the operation condition of the LP last stage will be influenced by the turbine back pressure change and the stage efficiency will be affected. This can’t guarantee the accuracy of the calculated results. YANG ET AL. condensing steam turbine with ACCs. There are totally EPE . Where the hlpi is the LP turbine inlet enthalpy under baseline condition. This Simplified Variable Operation Condition Analysis Method is used in [2] for analyzing the generator output change with the turbine back pressure. helep is the LP turbine expansion line end point enthalpy under baseline condition. Based on the LP turbine exhaust flow calculated in the above Simplified Variable Operation Condition Analysis. hid is the LP turbine ideal enthalpy drop under baseline condition. when the LP turbine inlet steam condition is stable. This Simplified Variable Operation Condition Analysis Method considers both the LP turbine last stage exhaust loss change and the extraction steam flow change of the LP heaters for turbine back pressure change conditions. which will lead to a smaller exhaust loss and thus a higher LP turbine efficiency UEEP (indicated by the slope of the dashed line on Figure 1). including: Many of the parameters related to the detailed variable operation analysis can’t be collected. and the efficiency of the following turbine pressure stages is unchanged under turbine operation change conditions. 2. S. The Application of the Simplified Variable Operation Condition Analysis Method When the turbine steam inlet control valves are set to a position and kept unchanged (such as under the boiler follow operation mode). Therefore.H. and calculate the new corrected extraction pressure. LP turbine expansion line under different LP turbine back pressure operation conditions. First calculate the extraction steam flow for the LP heaters. it can be reasonably assumed that the LP turbine expansion line shape and expansion process is unchanged except for the Copyright © 2013 SciRes. Yet many of the difficulties need to be solved for this method. The symbols with “’” represent the operation condition with changed turbine back pressure. the commonly used calculation method adopted is described in [1]. When the impact of the turbine back pressure on unit output is considered.2. hel is the LP turbine last stage exhaust loss under baseline condition. and the final generator output change can be calculated using the heat balance method. using the detailed variable operation analysis for the LP turbine last blading. the LP turbine exhaust volumetric flow will decrease with the rising of the turbine back pressure. For the LP turbine. the 660MW steam turbine is a critical. The calculation result matches the real situation for one 600MW sub-critical generation unit. and the last stage exhaust loss curve provided by the turbine manufacture. the LP turbine is the only part where the turbine back pressure change has impact on turbine work. This iteration process continues until the parameter difference of the two iterations is lower than certain error. Calculation Example of Turbine Choked Back Pressure for Steam Turbine with ACCs For one example generation unit. the LP turbine last stage exhaust loss and the LP turbine used energy end point enthalpy hUEEP can be calculated. pc is the LP turbine back pressure under baseline condition. two-casing two-exhaust Figure 1. Thus the new LP turbine expansion line end point enthalpy can be calculated by: helep ' h jq h jr ' elep (1) The steam parameters of the LP turbine extractions can be determined by similar method. 1475 expansion line end point. single-shaft. But many of the equations in the variable operation analysis for the last stage are still deduced from one dimension condition.

For each load condition. The steam flow into the four nozzle groups on the HP turbine is controlled by the four mail control valves. Item Unit THA TRL kW 660.2 Unit Output 3.38 Main Steam Temperature ℃ 566.13 Main Steam Flow t/h 1878.90 1701.35 Reheat Steam Flow t/h 1600. including 1 control stage and 9 pressure stages for the HP turbine.00 Hot Reheat Steam Temperature ℃ 566. YANG ET AL.78 1349.20 Hot Reheat Steam Pressure MPa(a) 3.01 660. The steam turbine is controlled by nozzles. The main design data of the steam turbine is summarized in Table 1. Copyright © 2013 SciRes. EPE . Main design data of the steam turbine. the generator output change with the back pressure is shown for various operation load conditions. the turbine exhaust steam used energy end point enthalpy and the exhaust loss and the final generator output are calculated for various turbine back pressure operation conditions. 1476 28 stages in the turbine. 6 pressure stages for the IP turbine.40 Makeup Water % 0 3 Final Feedwater Temperature ℃ 273 277.42 2013.67 2550. The turbine choked back pressure result is shown in Table 2 and Figure 3.00 566. S.00 566. and 2×6 pressure stages for the LP turbine.07 312. the turbine choked back pressures under different operation load conditions are calculated.31 8225. Table 1. The LP turbine last blade has a height of 939.00 HP Turbine Exhaust Temperature ℃ 305.94 HP Turbine Exhaust Pressure MPa(a) 4.48 Turbine Back Pressure kPa 16 33 kJ/kg 2454.8 mm. LP Turbine Exhaust Enthalpy 8 6 Unit Output Relative Change (% 4 2 0 THA 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 90%THA 40 75%THA -2 50%THA -4 -6 -8 -10 Turbine Back Pressure (kPa) Figure 2.20 24.71 3.0 LP Turbine Exhaust Flow t/h 1254. Using this method. The ACC system is the mechanically drafted direct air-cooled system produced by the domestic manufacture. the turbine back pressure corresponding to the maximum generator output can be regarded as the turbine choked back pressure. Performance curves of the unit output with turbine back pressure.00 Unit Heat Rate kJ/kWh 7778. The Calculation Result of the Steam Turbines Choked Back Pressure Based on the turbine last stage exhaust loss curve.81 Main Steam Pressure MPa(a) 24.1.H.12 4. On Figure 2.

Vol. Operation Load (%) Turbine Choked Back Pressure (kPa) 100 9. EPE . YANG ET AL. For the choked back pressure curves.” Turbine Technology.0 50 5.” Turbine Technology. These curves provide valuable guidance for the economic operation of the power plant units. Lin. the solution of the choked back pressure is changed into a problem of how to determine the turbine power output change as a function of the turbine back pressure change.0 90 8. 1. 1477 Turbine Choked Back Pressure (kPa) 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 Unit Load Rate (%) Sub-Critical 600MW Unit with Wet Cooling T echnology Super-Critical 600MW Unit with ACC 线性 (S b C i i l 600MW U i i h W C li T h l ) Figure 3. The performance curve of the power output versus the turbine back pressure under various operation loads is given. Conclusions Copyright © 2013 SciRes. 32-34. 49.0 For comparison purpose. The proposed simplified variable operation condition analysis method is adopted for one sub-critical generation unit with ACCs. S. 2007. and curve of the turbine choked back pressure under different loads is provided. the choked back pressure for 600 MW four-casing four-exhaust sub-critical generation unit with wet cooling technology is illustrated on Figure 3. pp. Performance curves of the turbine choked back pressure with unit load. 46 No. 4.2 75 7. pp. Vol. Harbin China. Calculation results of choked back pressure under various operation loads.H. S. Based on the clear definition of the turbine choked back pressure. 1. REFERENCES [1] H. Table 2. 2004. Harbin China. Yang. 18-21. “Calculation and Correction of the Impact of Turbine Back Pressure on Turbine Output. [2] H. No. there is a significant increasing of the chocked pressure values for the units with ACCs compared with the similar curve of the units with wet cooling technology. “Simplified Calculation Method of Turbine Back Pressure Correction Curves. It can be shown from the Table 2 and Figure 3 that the turbine choked back pressure is in nearly linear relationship with the operation loads.

- Thermodynamics Problem Set With SolutionsCargado porfrancis
- Steam TurbineCargado porAbhinav
- TurbineCargado porlavpandey8719
- Ch.1 What is SteamCargado porkhala1391@gmail.com
- A Calculated Study of Wet Steam Flow in the Combined ExhaustCargado pormehmacar
- Condensate and FeedCargado porefmaggio
- Problem Sheet No 5Cargado pormahad ashfaq
- Steam TurbinesCargado porAdriana S Silva
- Condition Monitoring of Steam Turbines by Performance AnalysisCargado porabuhurairaqazi
- Admon Del Ries-Mod 1-2010Cargado porcerpegar
- IL IOF Steam Presentation (1)Cargado porcvkalyan
- Cool Water DispenserCargado porDaphne Lorraine Chua
- Export Outlook VietnamCargado porProductForecasts
- 46 1086 Ejectors for CpiCargado porAji
- Start_Up (1) - 250 Mw.pdfCargado porPrabhat Kisku
- executive summary power plantCargado porBISMI1
- Ammonia Plant analyse pinchCargado pordalila AMMAR
- Air Cooled Condenser - A Dry Cooling TowerCargado porGmail44
- Pid NotesCargado porNguyen Thien Tung
- iec61970cim15v33_iec61968cim11v13_iec62325cim01v07-changesCargado porhayjoss
- Paper 2 SetA 090410 KeyCargado poraditya_0141
- Thermal Power PlantCargado porRaghu Krishnan
- GENERAL STANDARD FOR MACHINERYCargado porsorenarya
- Desuperheater StudyCargado porManeesh Dwivedi
- Boiler Clayton1Cargado porAHMAD ABDULKARIM SHARIFA

- 23Cargado pordinesh23cbe
- 10 Soar Ph2 Rcm4 [Repaired]Cargado pordinesh23cbe
- Thermal Engineering I MECH a 2Cargado pordinesh23cbe
- ejectormodeling 82-A563Cargado porjlcheefei9258
- CFD Analysis of Superheater in View of BoilerCargado porRajneesh Vachaspati
- Compression TestingCargado pordinesh23cbe
- steamjetejector.pdfCargado porTiến Mạnh Nguyễn

- AIEEE Sample Paper 26thCargado porRajeev Gangwar
- Earthworms Build Soil Fertility - Student Farm, UC Davis, CaliforniaCargado porPennsylvania Association for Sustainable Agriculture
- Concept Paper Dog HarnessCargado porChristopher Palma
- Questions Having One Mark EachCargado porAshok Pradhan
- PHYSICAL • PHENOMENON AND'ITS APPLICATIONS TO TELEGRAPHY, TELEPHONY_A JOHNSEN K RAHBEKCargado porMartin Johnson
- Exam03 FS2016v2 SolutionCargado porQuyền Phạm
- The Spirit of NE Power PointCargado pornebraskacapitol
- Ch6Cargado porWalid Ben Husein
- Solar Energy Part 1Cargado porRakesh Reddy
- Advanced simulation of biomass gasification in a fluidized bed reactor using ASPEN PLUS.pdfCargado porShahzadKhurram
- (eBook-PDF) - Islam - Which Relation Between the Islam and ScienceCargado poranon-982833
- Combined Cycle Power PlantsCargado porFaouzi Tlemcen
- TD1_0610Cargado porLew Chee Cheong
- Choke SizingCargado porsherviny
- 4) principles of ecology.pptCargado porSharie Ruíz
- coatings-04-00018.pdfCargado porVictor Daniel Waas
- PPE_Blow-Down Equipment BrochureCargado porSrikanth Anumala
- AD IICargado porSaravanan Ramasamy
- Hig h e Ffi Cien Cy Si Mu Ltan EousCargado porsebascian
- Cygni Inverterless RevA3Cargado porRaja Rao Kamarsu
- An experimental study on the development of a b-type Stirling engineCargado porpeetbog
- Diploma ProjectCargado porAmarjit Sankhua
- Fluid Character is at IonCargado porAmabipi Abby
- chemistry ncfe testing specifications revised 17-18Cargado porapi-270143895
- unit7-day3-ionic-covalentCargado porapi-261280967
- Management Concept & TheoriesCargado porP Narayan Murthy
- Micro Hydro-Electric Energy Generation- An OverviewCargado porAJER JOURNAL
- Stanjan NotesCargado porcosti_snc
- Class 4 TextbookCargado porNachammai Shanmugam
- 3 Process Integration for Efficient Use of Energy 1.pdfCargado porNiranjana Murthy P