0 calificaciones0% encontró este documento útil (0 votos)
70 vistas1 página
The mayor has admitted publicly that once these officials' budgets were set they could spend them as they pleased. The city attorney, in violation of the city charter and the Georgia bar rules governing attorney conduct improperly refused to recognize this obvious conflict. The Plaintiffs had the city create a line item in their budget for attorneys' fees. When they requested checks to retain counsel the city illegally refused to issue them.
The mayor has admitted publicly that once these officials' budgets were set they could spend them as they pleased. The city attorney, in violation of the city charter and the Georgia bar rules governing attorney conduct improperly refused to recognize this obvious conflict. The Plaintiffs had the city create a line item in their budget for attorneys' fees. When they requested checks to retain counsel the city illegally refused to issue them.
The mayor has admitted publicly that once these officials' budgets were set they could spend them as they pleased. The city attorney, in violation of the city charter and the Georgia bar rules governing attorney conduct improperly refused to recognize this obvious conflict. The Plaintiffs had the city create a line item in their budget for attorneys' fees. When they requested checks to retain counsel the city illegally refused to issue them.
PRESS RELEASE FROM MARSHAL GREG COUNTRYMAN AND VIVIAN BISHOP
REGARDING CREDIT CARD CHARGES
NOVEMBER 14, 2014 A recent story concerning Marshal Countryman and Vivian Bishops use of credit cards to pay legal fees was misleading and omitted several critical facts. The reporter who ran this story did not seek out both sides but only printed that of the mayor and those under her control. The mayor has admitted publicly that once these officials budgets were set they could spend them as they pleased. This is consistent with Georgia law and written opinions from the city attorney and the city manager. When Marshal Countryman and Ms. Bishop realized that the mayor and others had violated the city charter and Georgia law regarding their budgets they sought assistance from the city attorney. They also specifically requested the city attorney advise them if he had a conflict and if so they would seek independent counsel. The city attorney, in violation of the city charter and the Georgia bar rules governing attorney conduct improperly refused to recognize this obvious conflict. Even worse he attempted to mislead Plaintiffs by telling them they had no legal claim. The Plaintiffs had the city create a line item in their budget for attorneys fees. This was consistent with the law. When they requested checks to retain counsel, however, the city illegally refused to issue them and then illegally deleted the line items from their budgets. The Plaintiffs repeatedly requested that this be corrected and that the city attorney properly and ethically perform his job. Presumably with the concurrence of Mayor Tomlinson the city and the city attorney refused to do so. As a result the Plaintiffs had no choice but to use their cards to retain counsel. These actions were made necessary by the continuing illegal actions of the city officials involved and were done in order to mitigate the damage such actions caused, and continue to cause. It is unfortunate that at a time when crime is running rampant, the courts and the law enforcement officials are overwhelmed, and the citizens of Columbus worry daily about their safety the mayor has decided the best use of her time is to play political games with these vital components of the citys public safety system. This type of pettiness and vengeful activity are an embarrassment to the city of Columbus and are beneath the dignity of the mayors office.